Andrea L . Baldini
As the Changjiang Scholar Distinguished Professor at Peking University, I specialize in interdisciplinary research that spans aesthetics, cultural studies, intellectual property law, and visual culture. My focus is on how creativity can infuse political and social value into everyday practices, particularly through street art, graffiti, and public art.
I am the founding Editor-in-Chief of the East Asian Journal of Philosophy (EAJP) and hold two doctorates—one in Philosophy from Temple University and another in Text Sciences from the University of Siena. I have authored three monographs, including A Philosophy Guide to Street Art and the Law (Brill), and my work is widely published in leading journals such as Philosophy Compass, Contemporary Aesthetics, Estetika, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, and The Journal of Visual Culture.
In addition to my own publications, I serve as a guest editor, scientific committee member, and sit on several editorial boards, including the Bloomsbury History of Modern Aesthetics series. Over the years, I have been recognized with multiple accolades, including the Top Paper in Urban Communication award from the National Communication Association (NCA) and the Nordev Prize from Temple University.
My career has taken me to various prestigious institutions, including roles as a Fulbright Fellow at Temple University, International Exchange Postdoctoral Fellow at the Institute for Advanced Studies of Nanjing University, and Visiting Scholar at both Padua University and CIEBA – School of Fine Arts at the University of Lisbon.
Supervisors: Susan Feagin and Joseph Margolis
I am the founding Editor-in-Chief of the East Asian Journal of Philosophy (EAJP) and hold two doctorates—one in Philosophy from Temple University and another in Text Sciences from the University of Siena. I have authored three monographs, including A Philosophy Guide to Street Art and the Law (Brill), and my work is widely published in leading journals such as Philosophy Compass, Contemporary Aesthetics, Estetika, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, and The Journal of Visual Culture.
In addition to my own publications, I serve as a guest editor, scientific committee member, and sit on several editorial boards, including the Bloomsbury History of Modern Aesthetics series. Over the years, I have been recognized with multiple accolades, including the Top Paper in Urban Communication award from the National Communication Association (NCA) and the Nordev Prize from Temple University.
My career has taken me to various prestigious institutions, including roles as a Fulbright Fellow at Temple University, International Exchange Postdoctoral Fellow at the Institute for Advanced Studies of Nanjing University, and Visiting Scholar at both Padua University and CIEBA – School of Fine Arts at the University of Lisbon.
Supervisors: Susan Feagin and Joseph Margolis
less
Related Authors
Nicholas J Crane
University of Wyoming
Dr. Sohaib Alam
Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University
Tyson Mitman
York St John University
INOPINATUM Study Center on Urban Creativity
Università degli Studi "La Sapienza" di Roma
Nouran El-Hawary
University of Otago
Karen Kurczynski
University of Massachusetts Amherst
InterestsView All (43)
Uploads
Videos by Andrea L . Baldini
Abstract:
This panel aims at deepening and building on the global aesthetics trend by considering both systematic discussions of aesthetics in the Chinese context and examples from Chinese art as salient to philosophical theorizing. The goal is to bring both contemporary Chinese theories of art and beauty as well as sustained analysis of Chinese art to the forefront of the studies of the arts.
In this talk, I take issue with AWE. By placing emphasis on the heretofore neglected relationship between art and work, I argue that, in principle, making art is in continuity with other forms of employment. I call this view artistic work normalism (AWN).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xFX-W6Gb2FM
Books by Andrea L . Baldini
scritto è che la street art ha una relazione costitutiva con la legge.
Un aspetto cruciale dell’identità di questo genere d’arte urbana
dipende dalla sua capacità di rovesciare gli usi dominanti degli spazi
pubblici. Gli artisti di street art sovvertono quelle leggi e norme sociali
che regolano la città. La street art non solo ha trasformato gli spazi
pubblici e le loro funzioni in materiale artistico, ma ha anche fatto
diventare la propria attitudine ribelle nei confronti della legge una risorsa
creativa. Questo saggio vuole chiarire e argomentare quest’idea,
traendo allo stesso momento importanti conseguenze per quanto riguarda
la metafisica della street art, il suo valore e la sua relazione con
la proprietà intellettuale, in particolare col diritto d’autore e i diritti
morali. All’estremo opposto rispetto all’arte contrattuale, la street art
è arte fuorilegge.
Unauthorized // Commissioned, through essays by Pietro Rivasi and Andrea Baldini, as well as with the images of Zelle Asphaltkultur, Fra32 and Egs among others, investigates the complex relationship between urban art and institutions, taking as an example the experiences of “Icone” and “1984. Evoluzione e rigenerazione del writing”
Thesis by Andrea L . Baldini
Papers by Andrea L . Baldini
Abstract:
This panel aims at deepening and building on the global aesthetics trend by considering both systematic discussions of aesthetics in the Chinese context and examples from Chinese art as salient to philosophical theorizing. The goal is to bring both contemporary Chinese theories of art and beauty as well as sustained analysis of Chinese art to the forefront of the studies of the arts.
In this talk, I take issue with AWE. By placing emphasis on the heretofore neglected relationship between art and work, I argue that, in principle, making art is in continuity with other forms of employment. I call this view artistic work normalism (AWN).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xFX-W6Gb2FM
scritto è che la street art ha una relazione costitutiva con la legge.
Un aspetto cruciale dell’identità di questo genere d’arte urbana
dipende dalla sua capacità di rovesciare gli usi dominanti degli spazi
pubblici. Gli artisti di street art sovvertono quelle leggi e norme sociali
che regolano la città. La street art non solo ha trasformato gli spazi
pubblici e le loro funzioni in materiale artistico, ma ha anche fatto
diventare la propria attitudine ribelle nei confronti della legge una risorsa
creativa. Questo saggio vuole chiarire e argomentare quest’idea,
traendo allo stesso momento importanti conseguenze per quanto riguarda
la metafisica della street art, il suo valore e la sua relazione con
la proprietà intellettuale, in particolare col diritto d’autore e i diritti
morali. All’estremo opposto rispetto all’arte contrattuale, la street art
è arte fuorilegge.
Unauthorized // Commissioned, through essays by Pietro Rivasi and Andrea Baldini, as well as with the images of Zelle Asphaltkultur, Fra32 and Egs among others, investigates the complex relationship between urban art and institutions, taking as an example the experiences of “Icone” and “1984. Evoluzione e rigenerazione del writing”
I reject pessimism about space travel by pointing out that its arguments suffer from significant conceptual problems.
By introducing colorful and witty unexpected forms in the desolation of the “red zone” and temporary housing units, street artworks in L’Aquila violated what one expected to see in those places of sorrow and loneliness. In other words, those artworks called into questions the “distribution of the sensible” (Rancière 2004) regulating visibility in that context. In the light of this understanding of street art, we conceptualize how street artworks brought back to life the crumbled walls of L’Aquila by opposing hierarchies of visibility in the aftermath of the 2009 earthquake.
By turning inside out the norms and rules regulating the use of visible surfaces in post-earthquake L’Aquila, artists “made strange” (Foucault 1988) the order imposing quarantine on the lives of the Aquilani. Introducing street artworks in key areas of the city, including the forbidden “red zone,” showed that the authoritarian decisions of closing down the city center were far from inevitable. But once the expected appears as a contingent artifact of human will, it is then open to change. By disrupting dominant uses of public spaces in post-earthquake L’Aquila, we show that those artworks fostered discussion among citizens, opening a space for imagining alternative ways of thinking about the city and its reconstruction.