not only are there no bad languages there are also no bad or annoying dialects
Every dialect you don’t like is a friend you haven’t yet made
If you find yourself disliking a dialect, that’s a little string you can pull on to unlearn some bullshit. There’s a very good chance that you’ll find that dialect is associated with
- a racial minority
- the queer subculture of a racial minority
- poor people
- poor rural people
- yes, especially those poor rural people you’ve also been taught to associate with right wing politics. Rethink that shit.
- a colonized people
- a very old religious divide that was used as an excuse for colonization and resource extraction from poor and/or colonized people
- teenagers
- teenagers of color
- all of the above somehow
There is one bad language. Which is contemporary Hebrew. And it’s bad because it was deliberately used to wipe out Yiddish and Ladino, which are now both endangered. It’s not even the same as biblical Hebrew.
This would be like if the vatican decided that every italian language, every local italian dialect, should be scrubbed in order for every single italian to be forced to learn Latin, but not the original Latin, a newer version of Latin influenced by modern languages. And also in this metaphor Venetian was seen as the language of the people among Trotsky-ite communists in the soviet union.
The promotion of Hebrew at the expense of Yiddish and Ladino is a very interesting topic but this is absolutely not the only language which does/did that.
Pretty much EVERY state has whipped out regional languages, dialects and minority languages in their effort to increase their control over their population. It’s what states do.
And pretty much EVERY colonial project has whipped out languages in their effort to eradicate the cultures they were colonizing. It’s what colonists do.
You wanna talk about a language that was pushed into dominance at the expense of other languages? Motherfucking English wins the gold medal.
Also, be careful not to apply that historical - and current - political knowledge to the individual speakers of a language. Most people don’t have a lot of options in what language they speak.
They acquire one language at birth, maybe get one of two other languages taught to them when they’re kids - and they don’t get to choose which ones - and never after that do they have the very considerable time and resources that they would need to learn another language as an adult. Only a very lucky talented few people can acquire extra languages as a hobby. Most of us can’t.
So judging people solely based on the language they speak is pretty much always still bullshit even if they speak a colonialist language. Which doesn’t mean they can’t experience privilege from the language they speak or that they can’t wield their knowledge of a dominant language in a colonial, or otherwise oppressive way, over those who speak an oppressed language. But that’s a specific behavior.