SIKKIM UNIVERSITY
Geology
This Paper is very good for fundamental understanding.
- by Pinaki Sahoo
- •
- Ore
A fter learning about how the earth was born, how it evolved its crust and other inner layers, how its crustal plates moved and are moving, and other information on earthquakes, the forms of volcanism and about the rocks and minerals the... more
A fter learning about how the earth was born, how it evolved its crust and other inner layers, how its crustal plates moved and are moving, and other information on earthquakes, the forms of volcanism and about the rocks and minerals the crust is composed of, it is time to know in detail about the surface of the earth on which we live. Let us start with this question. Why is the surface of the earth uneven? First of all, the earth's crust is dynamic. You are well aware that it has moved and moves vertically and horizontally. Of course, it moved a bit faster in the past than the rate at which it is moving now. The differences in the internal forces operating from within the earth which built up the crust have been responsible for the variations in the outer surface of the crust. The earth's surface is being continuously subjected to external forces induced basically by energy (sunlight). Of course, the internal forces are still active though with different intensities. That means, the earth's surface is being continuously subjected to by external forces originating within the earth's atmosphere and by internal forces from within the earth. The external forces are known as exogenic forces and the internal forces are known as endogenic forces. The actions of exogenic forces result in wearing down (degradation) of relief/elevations and filling up (aggradation) of basins/depressions, on the earth's surface. The phenomenon of wearing down of relief variations of the surface of the earth through erosion is known as gradation. The endogenic forces continuously elevate or build up parts of the earth's surface and hence the exogenic processes fail to even out the relief variations of the surface of the earth. So, variations remain as long as the opposing actions of exogenic and endogenic forces continue. In general terms, the endogenic forces are mainly land building forces and the exogenic processes are mainly land wearing forces. The surface of the earth is sensitive. Humans depend on it for their sustenance and have been using it extensively and intensively. So, it is essential to understand its nature in order to use it effectively without disturbing its balance and diminishing its potential for the future. Almost all organisms contribute to sustain the earth's environment. However, humans have caused over use of resources. Use we must, but must also leave it potential enough to sustain life through the future. Most of the surface of the earth had and has been shaped over very long periods of time (hundreds and thousands of years) and because of its use and misuse by humans its potential is being diminished at a fast rate. If the processes which shaped and are shaping the surface of the earth into varieties of forms (shapes) and the nature of materials of which it is composed of, are understood, precautions can be taken to minimise the detrimental effects of human use and to preserve it for posterity.
- by Pinaki Sahoo
- •
Metal contamination in drinking water has drawn attention since it gravely jeopardizes human health. This study was conducted in pre- and post-monsoon season in 2021 at Dhemaji, Assam, India. It characterized metal pollutants in... more
Metal contamination in drinking water has drawn attention since it gravely jeopardizes human health. This study was conducted in pre- and post-monsoon season in 2021 at Dhemaji, Assam, India. It characterized metal pollutants in groundwater, their distribution, possible sources, and evaluated the potential toxicity and associated health risk assessment. The seasonal mean concentration of Fe in both seasons is observed highest followed by Mn, Zn, Cu, As, and Ni. Furthermore, the metal concentrations during pre-monsoon are comparatively higher. The geogenic processes and agricultural practices are the major sources of groundwater metal contamination as evident from the statistical analysis. The different pollution indices viz. Heavy-metal Pollution Index (HPI),
Heavy-metal Evaluation Index (HEI) and Degree of Contamination (Cd) suggested that groundwater is not suitable for drinking uses. The Heavy Metal Toxicity Load (HMTL) suggesting As, Co, Mn and Hg should be
removed from the groundwater to ensure safety. Water pollution indices (WPI) suggest that Fe, Mn, As and Ni are the main pollution-causing metals in the study area which may be restored under the BIS and WHO limit by diluting the water. The human health risk has been calculated by carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risk assessment. The non-carcinogenic risk for adults and children is within the threshold limit. The carcinogenic risk shows that continuous exposure of As and Ni may give rise to cancer among adults and children in the region. Therefore, comprehensive groundwater quality monitoring with well-planned treatment should be needed to provide safe and clean drinking water in the studied area.
Heavy-metal Evaluation Index (HEI) and Degree of Contamination (Cd) suggested that groundwater is not suitable for drinking uses. The Heavy Metal Toxicity Load (HMTL) suggesting As, Co, Mn and Hg should be
removed from the groundwater to ensure safety. Water pollution indices (WPI) suggest that Fe, Mn, As and Ni are the main pollution-causing metals in the study area which may be restored under the BIS and WHO limit by diluting the water. The human health risk has been calculated by carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risk assessment. The non-carcinogenic risk for adults and children is within the threshold limit. The carcinogenic risk shows that continuous exposure of As and Ni may give rise to cancer among adults and children in the region. Therefore, comprehensive groundwater quality monitoring with well-planned treatment should be needed to provide safe and clean drinking water in the studied area.
- by Shailesh K Yadav and +1
- •
Arsenic and uranium in the aquatic environment are recognized as a major catastrophic problem worldwide and have natural as well as human-made sources such as mining, industry and agriculture. The severity of this problem is further... more
Arsenic and uranium in the aquatic environment are recognized as a major catastrophic problem worldwide and have natural as well as human-made sources such as mining, industry and agriculture. The severity of this problem is further accelerated by in-situ physio-chemical factors in the fluvial environment which enhances the concentration of arsenic and uranium in groundwater that feeds millions of people in Central Gangetic Plain in India. This study aims to establish a better understanding of the processes responsible for the co-occurrence of arsenic and uranium along with the factors controlling their solubility and mobility in the groundwater of central Gangetic plain. This study is an attempt to bring out the (a) the spatial distribution pattern of arsenic and uranium, (b) insight into the hydrogeochemical characteristics of aquifers that are controlling their co-occurrence and provides (c) information of their source which are validated by statistical tools. Silicate weathering controls U mobilization and distribution whereas carbonate dissolution and ion exchange process controls As in groundwater. The land use and land cover pattern of the Northeastern (NE) part of the study area is agriculture dominated and is composed of Holocene older alluvium. However, the South and Southwestern areas which are closer to the river are formed by the deposition of river born newer alluvial. Newer alluvium in the SW part has unoxidized organic-rich clay that enhances arsenic mobilization by reductive dissolution of Fe-oxyhydroxide. In the NE region, the abundance of fertilizers in the subsurface oxidizing environment augments the solubility and mobility of uranium.
- by Shailesh K Yadav and +1
- •
- Environmental Science, Geology, Arsenic, Groundwater
The hydro-geochemistry and isotopic variations in groundwater, coupled with sediment geochemistry, were investigated in the Middle Gangetic Plain, India, to better understand the aquifer dynamics that influence the arsenic (As) evolution... more
The hydro-geochemistry and isotopic variations in groundwater, coupled with sediment geochemistry, were investigated in the Middle Gangetic Plain, India, to better understand the aquifer dynamics that influence the arsenic (As) evolution and mobilization. Eighty-four groundwater samples, thirteen River water samples, and two sediment cores (33 mbgl) were studied. The samples were analyzed for major ions and trace metals, including As and stable isotopic variability (d 2 H, d 18 O, and d 13 C). The study area was categorized into older and younger alluvium based on existing geomorphological differences. Younger alluvium exhibits higher As enrichment in sediment and groundwater, ranging of 2.59-31.52 mg/kg and bdl to 0.62 mg/L. Groundwater samples were thermodynamically more stable with As(OH) 3 species ranging from 88.5% to 91.4% and FeOOH from 69% to 81%, respectively. PHREEQC and mineralogical analysis suggested goethite and siderite act as a source and sink for As. However, statistical analysis suggested reductive dissolution as the primary mechanism for As mobilization in the study area. Spatio-temporal analysis revealed elevated concentrations of As in the central and northeastern regions of the study area. Stable isotope (d 2 H and d 18 O) analysis inferred active recharge conditions primarily driven by precipitation. The depleted d-excess value and enriched d 18 O in the groundwater of younger alluvium indicate the effect of groundwater recharge with significant evaporation enrichment. Groundwater recharge potentially decreased the quantity of arsenic in groundwater, whereas evaporation enrichment increased it. Rainwater infiltration during recharge introduces oxygenated water into the aquifer, leading to changes in the redox conditions and facilitating biogeochemical reactions. The carbon isotope (d 13 C) results suggest that high microbial activity in younger alluvium promotes As leaching from sediment into the groundwater.
- by Shailesh K Yadav and +1
- •
- Hydrology, Stable Isotopes, Hydrogeochemistry
Metal contamination in drinking water has drawn attention since it gravely jeopardizes human health. This study was conducted in pre- and post-monsoon season in 2021 at Dhemaji, Assam, India. It characterized metal pollutants in... more
Metal contamination in drinking water has drawn attention since it gravely jeopardizes human health. This study was conducted in pre- and post-monsoon season in 2021 at Dhemaji, Assam, India. It characterized metal pollutants in groundwater, their distribution, possible sources, and evaluated the potential toxicity and associated health risk assessment. The seasonal mean concentration of Fe in both seasons is observed highest followed by Mn, Zn, Cu, As, and Ni. Furthermore, the metal concentrations during pre-monsoon are comparatively higher. The geogenic processes and agricultural practices are the major sources of groundwater metal contamination as evident from the statistical analysis. The different pollution indices viz. Heavy-metal Pollution Index (HPI),
Heavy-metal Evaluation Index (HEI) and Degree of Contamination (Cd) suggested that groundwater is not suitable for drinking uses. The Heavy Metal Toxicity Load (HMTL) suggesting As, Co, Mn and Hg should be
removed from the groundwater to ensure safety. Water pollution indices (WPI) suggest that Fe, Mn, As and Ni are the main pollution-causing metals in the study area which may be restored under the BIS and WHO limit by diluting the water. The human health risk has been calculated by carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risk assessment. The non-carcinogenic risk for adults and children is within the threshold limit. The carcinogenic risk shows that continuous exposure of As and Ni may give rise to cancer among adults and children in the region. Therefore, comprehensive groundwater quality monitoring with well-planned treatment should be needed to provide safe and clean drinking water in the studied area.
Heavy-metal Evaluation Index (HEI) and Degree of Contamination (Cd) suggested that groundwater is not suitable for drinking uses. The Heavy Metal Toxicity Load (HMTL) suggesting As, Co, Mn and Hg should be
removed from the groundwater to ensure safety. Water pollution indices (WPI) suggest that Fe, Mn, As and Ni are the main pollution-causing metals in the study area which may be restored under the BIS and WHO limit by diluting the water. The human health risk has been calculated by carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risk assessment. The non-carcinogenic risk for adults and children is within the threshold limit. The carcinogenic risk shows that continuous exposure of As and Ni may give rise to cancer among adults and children in the region. Therefore, comprehensive groundwater quality monitoring with well-planned treatment should be needed to provide safe and clean drinking water in the studied area.
- by Shailesh K Yadav and +1
- •
Water quality degradation exerts immense pressure on the availability of suitable freshwater resources. Deterioration in water quality has led to a decrease in the available water for consumption purposes. The excess concentration of... more
Water quality degradation exerts immense pressure on the availability of suitable freshwater resources. Deterioration in water quality has led to a decrease in the available water for consumption purposes. The excess concentration of heavy metals and faecal contamination in water pose a risk to human health. This study looks at heavy metal contamination and microbial contamination in different water samples of the east and south districts of Sikkim. The sampling extended for tap water, springs, and river water samples across monsoon, post-monsoon, and pre-monsoon seasons. The concentrations of heavy metals in most samples, except for some river water samples were under permissible limits set by the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) and World Health Organisation (WHO). Indices such as Heavy Metal Pollution Index (HPI), Heavy Metal Evaluation Index (HEI), and Contamination Index (C d) show a higher proportion of contamination in the river water samples than in tap and spring water samples and during monsoon season. Sources apportionment of metal concentration show geogenic as well as anthropological sources. For microbial contamination Most Probable Number (MPN) index was used showing possible faecal contamination in all water samples rendering them unsuitable for drinking purposes without appropriate treatment. The study also highlights the urgent need for effective measures to address faecal contamination in the water sources of the study area.
Black carbon (BC) and brown carbon (BrC) have versatile nature, and they have apparent role 13 in the climate variability and changes. As the anthropogenic activity is surging, the BC and 14 BrC are also reportedly increasing. So, the... more
Black carbon (BC) and brown carbon (BrC) have versatile nature, and they have apparent role 13 in the climate variability and changes. As the anthropogenic activity is surging, the BC and 14 BrC are also reportedly increasing. So, the monitoring of BC/BrC and observation of land use 15 land cover changes (LULCC) at regional level are necessary for the various interconnected 16 meteorological phenomenal changes. The current study investigates BC, BrC, CO2, BC from 17 fossil fuels (BCff), BC from biomass burning (BCbb), LULCC, and their relationship to the 18 corresponding meteorological conditions over Gangtok in Sikkim Himalayan region. The 19 concentration of BC (BrC) 43.5 μg/m 3 (32.0 μg/m 3) is found to be highest during the March-20 2022 (April-2021). Surface pressure has been found to have a significant positive correlation 21 with BC, BCff, BCbb and BrC. The boundary layer is calmer and more stable when the surface 22 pressure is higher, which keeps contaminants deposited there. The wind, on the other hand, 23 appears to represent the dispersion of pollutants with a strong negative correlation. The fact 24 that all pollutants and precipitation have been shown to behave similarly points to moist 25 scavenging of the pollutants. Despite the dense cloud cover, it is clear that the area is not 26 receiving convective precipitation, implying that orographic precipitation is occurring over the 27 region. Most of Sikkim receives convective rain from May to September, indicating that the 28 region has significant convective activity contributed from the Bay of Bengal during monsoon 29 season. Furthermore, monsoon months have the lowest concentrations of BC, BCbb, BCff, and 30 BrC, suggesting the potential of convective rain (as rain out scavenging) to remove most of 31 the pollutants. Moreover, BC and BrC show positive radiative feedback.