關於Robot的意思和用法的提問
包含"Robot"的句子的意思
Q:
fighting these robots is getting us no way是什麼意思
A:
이 로봇들과 싸우는 것은 우리에게 아무런 도움이 되지 않아: fighting these robots is getting us no way
Q:
A robot cleaner is very convenient.
It can reach where I can't reach like a tiny gap between objectives or under the sofas stuff like that.
1. it saves me a lot of trouble and time
2. It saves mea a lot of work and time是什麼意思
It can reach where I can't reach like a tiny gap between objectives or under the sofas stuff like that.
1. it saves me a lot of trouble and time
2. It saves mea a lot of work and time是什麼意思
A:
It saves me a lot of time and trouble.
That sounds the most natural.
That sounds the most natural.
Q:
robots designed of hazardous jobs, take their mission too far and too literally.是什麼意思
A:
危険な仕事のためのロボットが、自分の任務を従いすぎて、文字通り過ぎて行動します。
という感じだと思います。
という感じだと思います。
Q:
There already exists “autonomous” surgical robots that use radiation beams to treat cancers or those offering reduced human input for tasks involving rigid, fixed tissues (i.e., bones) for joint replacements.是什麼意思
A:
rigid (hard, stiff) - like bones
fixed tissues - tissues that are permanently attached to things - like tendons
joints - like knees, hips, elbows, 等
rigid (hard, stiff) - like bones
fixed tissues - tissues that are permanently attached to things - like tendons
joints - like knees, hips, elbows, 等
Q:
"it's more so a robot"是什麼意思
A:
@tjstkdn No, I do not agree. "It's more so a robot" is a more formal, perhaps stuffy, way to say "It's more like a robot." They are basically interchangeable.
"Robot" 的用法和例句
Q:
請提供關於 robot 的例句給我。
A:
The scientist makes a robot, but it has no emotions. It has a heart of steel.
She moved with no grace; she looked like a robot.
She moved with no grace; she looked like a robot.
Q:
請提供關於 autonomous robot 的例句給我。
A:
In the not too distant future, all robots will be completely autonomous (= on their own).
"Robot"的近義詞和區別
Q:
A robot toppled over and hurt a kid. 和 A robot collapsed over and hurt a kid. 的差別在哪裡?
A:
The first is fine. The second is not. Someone doesn’t “collapse over”. You could say, “A kid was hurt when a robot collapsed.”
Q:
The robot runs like a real dog. 和 The robot runs as a real dog. 的差別在哪裡?
A:
Both “like” and “as” are used to make similes which are essentially metaphors. You compare one thing to another thing fo show similarity. I agree “like” sounds better in this case. They have the same meaning but use “like”
I think the “such as” sounds a bit awkward so maybe you can say “the robot runs as if it’s a real dog”
I think the “such as” sounds a bit awkward so maybe you can say “the robot runs as if it’s a real dog”
Q:
for me, he was not a robot 和 he was not a robot for me 和 he was not a robot to me 的差別在哪裡?
A:
the first one is just your opinion
the second one sounds the same with the first one
the last one implies how he behaves in front of you. maybe they say he acts like a robot but when he talks with you, you don't feel he's like a robot
the second one sounds the same with the first one
the last one implies how he behaves in front of you. maybe they say he acts like a robot but when he talks with you, you don't feel he's like a robot
Q:
The robot helps us to wake up 和 The robot helps us to get up 的差別在哪裡?
A:
These are very similar, and can be used interchangeably in most contexts.
Technically, I'd say that "waking up" doesn't always mean getting up, because you can be awake and lie in bed. "Getting up", however, implies waking up and getting out of bed to start your day.
Also yes, your sentences are grammatically correct (:
Technically, I'd say that "waking up" doesn't always mean getting up, because you can be awake and lie in bed. "Getting up", however, implies waking up and getting out of bed to start your day.
Also yes, your sentences are grammatically correct (:
Q:
robot 和 droid 的差別在哪裡?
A:
Droid is short for android.
An android is a robot that is designed to look and act like a human being. In science fiction stories the characters often cannot tell when androids are not actually humans.
A robot is any machine that does human-like tasks, it does not have to look human. Most of the robots used in today's world are not androids.
An android is a robot that is designed to look and act like a human being. In science fiction stories the characters often cannot tell when androids are not actually humans.
A robot is any machine that does human-like tasks, it does not have to look human. Most of the robots used in today's world are not androids.
"Robot" 的翻譯
Q:
it was automatically robot用 英語 (美國) 要怎麼說?
A:
Automatic (adjective)
✅It was an automatic robot = adjective + noun
✅The robot moves automatically = noun + verb + adverb
❌automatically robot = adverb + noun
✅It was an automatic robot = adjective + noun
✅The robot moves automatically = noun + verb + adverb
❌automatically robot = adverb + noun
Q:
robot có thể sẽ vừa là người dọn dẹp nhà cửa, vừa là người giữ trẻ và chuẩn bị các bữa ăn.用 英語 (美國) 要怎麼說?
A:
the robot will probably just be cleaning the house, just Babysitting and cooking
Q:
What's wrong in "He wants to have a robot that can talk"用 英語 (美國) 要怎麼說?
A:
That sentence is correct!
Q:
The robot was designed for the purpose of hunting.用 英語 (美國) 要怎麼說?
A:
It sounds good 👍
"Robot"有關的其他問題
Q:
I think robots will help make life better in the future. I have two reasons. First, robots will convenient our life. Because robots are very smart, so they can work instead of humans. And we can take time. Second, robots can develop the unknown world. For example, they can research a mars. We can't research if there aren't robots. In short, robots will help make life better due to convenient our life and develop the unknown world. 聼起來自然嗎?
A:
I think robots will help make life better in the future. I have two reasons. First, robots will convenient our life. Because robots are very smart, so they can work instead of humans. And we can take time. Second, robots can develop the unknown world. For example, they can research a mars. We can't research if there aren't robots. In short, robots will help make life better due to convenient our life and develop the unknown world.
I am sorry but this is not natural at all.
Convenient is a word used to describe something, it can not be used on something.
“Our lives are convenient”
I think robots will help make life better in the future, because of two reasons. First, robots will make our lives more convenient. Robots are very smart there for they can work instead of us, and that will free up our time. Second, robots can develop the unknown world. For example, they can explore mars. Robots will help make life better due to making our lives more convenient, and exploring places we can not go.
I am sorry but this is not natural at all.
Convenient is a word used to describe something, it can not be used on something.
“Our lives are convenient”
I think robots will help make life better in the future, because of two reasons. First, robots will make our lives more convenient. Robots are very smart there for they can work instead of us, and that will free up our time. Second, robots can develop the unknown world. For example, they can explore mars. Robots will help make life better due to making our lives more convenient, and exploring places we can not go.
Q:
I don't think we will see robots teaching in the school, because teachers have to communicate with various children and handle a matter flexibly even in the unexpected. 聼起來自然嗎?
A:
I don't think we will see robots teaching in schools, because teachers have to communicate with various children and handle matters flexibly even in the event of the unexpected.
Q:
I disagree that robots will take the place of humans at work in the future. My opinion is based on the following considerations.
Firstly, robots cannot communicate with humans on a true meaning. Robots can react and respond to us based on what we say or write to them. However, it is important to understand or imagine why we say or write that so as to achieve a good communication, which robots cannot do yet.
Secondly, robots do not have creativity. They can do only the things that we tell them to do. In order to keep a company prospering in the society, it is important not only to do routine accurately but also to continue to generate new values.
I do believe that robots will play a big role at work. However, for these reasons stated above, I strongly think that robots cannot take our position in business completely in the future.
聼起來自然嗎?
Firstly, robots cannot communicate with humans on a true meaning. Robots can react and respond to us based on what we say or write to them. However, it is important to understand or imagine why we say or write that so as to achieve a good communication, which robots cannot do yet.
Secondly, robots do not have creativity. They can do only the things that we tell them to do. In order to keep a company prospering in the society, it is important not only to do routine accurately but also to continue to generate new values.
I do believe that robots will play a big role at work. However, for these reasons stated above, I strongly think that robots cannot take our position in business completely in the future.
聼起來自然嗎?
A:
I disagree with the premise that robots will take the place of human workers in the future. My opinion is based on the following considerations.
Firstly, robots cannot communicate with humans on a deep level. Robots can react and respond to us based on what we say or write to them. However, it is an important skill to use human emotion in order to understand or imagine the context of what we are conveying in order to achieve good communication. This is a skill that robots do not possess.
Secondly, robots do not have the ability to be creative. They can do only the things that we tell them to do. In order to keep a company prospering in society, it is important not only to do a routine accurately, but also to continue to generate new values.
I do believe that robots will play a big role in the working world. However, for these reasons stated above, I strongly think that robots cannot take our position in business completely in the future.
Firstly, robots cannot communicate with humans on a deep level. Robots can react and respond to us based on what we say or write to them. However, it is an important skill to use human emotion in order to understand or imagine the context of what we are conveying in order to achieve good communication. This is a skill that robots do not possess.
Secondly, robots do not have the ability to be creative. They can do only the things that we tell them to do. In order to keep a company prospering in society, it is important not only to do a routine accurately, but also to continue to generate new values.
I do believe that robots will play a big role in the working world. However, for these reasons stated above, I strongly think that robots cannot take our position in business completely in the future.
Q:
“A.I. robots also have information that difficult to know for foreigners like transportation.”
Is this sentence correct?
Is this sentence correct?
A:
A.I. is good at helping foreigners with things that are hard to understand like transportation.
Q:
What does "an obvious robot tell" mean in the text?
Thanks in advance.
Thanks in advance.
A:
A tell is a clue you can use to know when someone is lying, based on their behavior. It's a term often used in the game of poker, where a big part of the game is guessing whether players are bluffing.
有關單詞和短語的意思和用法
最新單字
robot
HiNative是用戶之前互相交換知識的問答平台。
最新問題
- 你能阅读我的论文导言并告诉我是否有任何错误或我可以改进的方法吗?谢谢你们! 台湾国立政治大学选举研究中心进行的《台湾人台湾/中国身份变化调查》清晰地呈现了台湾岛的身份状况。自1992年到2...
- 我正在翻譯一篇新聞文章,在下面的句子中,我不清楚「不就」是甚麼意思:「問題是接管加薩等於是將巴勒斯坦完全隔絕、甚至趕出,美以的算盤,不就是讓巴勒斯坦人自動離境,美軍進駐,等於保護以色列避免受到伊...
- 正在 和 现在 的差別在哪裡?
- すみません。 あなたは男性でしょうか?女性でしょうか? 名前の最後に〜先生、〜小姐と書きたいので教えて貰えないでしょうか?用 中文 (繁體,臺灣) 要怎麼說?
- (「現在我心情不好。」と言う友達に) 『どうしたの?私で良かったら話聞くよ。話すと楽になるかもよ。』 用 中文 (繁體,臺灣) 要怎麼說?
最新問題(HOT)
- 天仁茗茶用 中文 (繁體,臺灣) 要怎麼說?
- ちいかわがとても可愛いです用 中文 (繁體,臺灣) 要怎麼說?
- 麻煩可以幫我找店家嗎 和 可以麻煩幫我找店家嗎 的差別在哪裡?
- 【立春】 暦の上では春を迎えましたが、 まだまだ厳しい寒さが続いております。 お身体ご自愛下さい。用 中文 (繁體,臺灣) 要怎麼說?
- https://youtu.be/Cmdfbbe1WyQ?si=g83Wsu4BgJexlg4u&t=2770 這集影片上星巴克服務員受到點以後說了什麼? この動画のスタバの店員さんは注...
矚目的提問