Ben McKay
Assistant Professor of Development and Sustainability at the University of Calgary
less
Related Authors
Daniela Andrade
Institute of Social Studies, The Hague
Valdemar J. Wesz Junior
Universidade Federal da Integração Latino-Americana
Shaohua Zhan
Nanyang Technological University
Zhang Hongzhou
Nanyang Technological University
Mindi Schneider
Brown University
Gustavo de L. T. Oliveira
University of California, Irvine
Benjamin Creutzfeldt
Universität Leipzig
Jiayi Zhou
University of California, Berkeley
Maria Jose Haro Sly
Renmin University of China
Uploads
Papers by Ben McKay
influencing the global economy and trade relations. Of particular
importance for agrarian change is China’s increased demand for (agro)
commodities which has led to new partnerships abroad in order to
secure natural resource access. This paper analyses the increasing
economic and political relations between China and Latin America
and raises questions concerning new trajectories of agrarian change
and resource access, asking whether, how and to what extent a new
consensus has emerged in reaction to the Washington Consensus
which ushered in neoliberal policies to the region from the 1970s
onward.
distribution infrastructure and conditions of land conversion, each prompting political interventions by the state. The paper then suggests how this same process is taking place, albeit shaped by different contexts, in Southern Africa and Cambodia. It concludes with some key questions for further research: is flexing eroding the distinction between crop regimes? How do primary processors decide what their product mix will be? And on what basis do state actors support flexing between
agricultural products and investments in so-called bio-refineries?
‘food sovereignty’ might entail. At the forefront of this movement are the countries of the so-called ‘pink tide’ of Latin America – chiefly Venezuela, Ecuador and Bolivia. This paper examines how state commitments to food sovereignty have been put into practice in these three countries, asking if and how efforts by the state contribute to significant transformation or if they simply serve the political purposes of elites. Understanding the state as a complex arena of class struggle, we suggest that state efforts around food sovereignty open up new political spaces in an ongoing struggle around control over food systems at different scales. Embedded in food sovereignty is a contradictory notion of sovereignty, requiring simultaneously a strong developmentalist state and the redistribution of power to facilitate direct control over
food systems in ways that may threaten the state. State-society relations, particularly across scales, are therefore a central problematic of food sovereignty projects.
production model which has considerably diminished the need for labour. This paper explores mechanisms and processes of ‘productive exclusion’ in the soy producing zones of Santa Cruz in relation to the expansion, concentration and mechanization of the ‘soy complex’. We provide an analysis of how the agrarian
structure has developed since soy was adopted – from ‘putting land into production’ to ‘expanding the agricultural frontier’ and ‘controlling the agro-industrial chain’. We explore how and the extent to which the penetration of new capital is leading to new
processes of agrarian change which exclude the rural majority from accessing the means of production. While a process of ‘foreignization’ of land began to take shape in the early 1990s, new processes of capital accumulation are eroding the ability of
small farmers to engage in productive activity, potentially leading to ‘surplus’ populations no longer needed for capital accumulation.
influencing the global economy and trade relations. Of particular
importance for agrarian change is China’s increased demand for (agro)
commodities which has led to new partnerships abroad in order to
secure natural resource access. This paper analyses the increasing
economic and political relations between China and Latin America
and raises questions concerning new trajectories of agrarian change
and resource access, asking whether, how and to what extent a new
consensus has emerged in reaction to the Washington Consensus
which ushered in neoliberal policies to the region from the 1970s
onward.
distribution infrastructure and conditions of land conversion, each prompting political interventions by the state. The paper then suggests how this same process is taking place, albeit shaped by different contexts, in Southern Africa and Cambodia. It concludes with some key questions for further research: is flexing eroding the distinction between crop regimes? How do primary processors decide what their product mix will be? And on what basis do state actors support flexing between
agricultural products and investments in so-called bio-refineries?
‘food sovereignty’ might entail. At the forefront of this movement are the countries of the so-called ‘pink tide’ of Latin America – chiefly Venezuela, Ecuador and Bolivia. This paper examines how state commitments to food sovereignty have been put into practice in these three countries, asking if and how efforts by the state contribute to significant transformation or if they simply serve the political purposes of elites. Understanding the state as a complex arena of class struggle, we suggest that state efforts around food sovereignty open up new political spaces in an ongoing struggle around control over food systems at different scales. Embedded in food sovereignty is a contradictory notion of sovereignty, requiring simultaneously a strong developmentalist state and the redistribution of power to facilitate direct control over
food systems in ways that may threaten the state. State-society relations, particularly across scales, are therefore a central problematic of food sovereignty projects.
production model which has considerably diminished the need for labour. This paper explores mechanisms and processes of ‘productive exclusion’ in the soy producing zones of Santa Cruz in relation to the expansion, concentration and mechanization of the ‘soy complex’. We provide an analysis of how the agrarian
structure has developed since soy was adopted – from ‘putting land into production’ to ‘expanding the agricultural frontier’ and ‘controlling the agro-industrial chain’. We explore how and the extent to which the penetration of new capital is leading to new
processes of agrarian change which exclude the rural majority from accessing the means of production. While a process of ‘foreignization’ of land began to take shape in the early 1990s, new processes of capital accumulation are eroding the ability of
small farmers to engage in productive activity, potentially leading to ‘surplus’ populations no longer needed for capital accumulation.