Books by Ronald David Glass
The University of California Center for Collaborative Research (CCREC) has published an important... more The University of California Center for Collaborative Research (CCREC) has published an important groundbreaking report on the ethics of research: Unsettling Research Ethics. This freely available 120-page report (https://ccrec.ucsc.edu/node/768) addresses critical foundational issues in institutionalized approaches to research ethics.
CCREC (https://ccrec.ucsc.edu/) is a UC system-wide initiative that links university researchers, community-based organizations, and policymakers in projects that address the most pressing cross-sector issues in the economy, employment, environment, food systems, housing, pubic health, and education.
Unsettling Research Ethics presents a distinctive framework for grappling with the ethics of research in the domains of knowledge, relationality, and space and time. CCREC Director and report co-editor Ron Glass notes that the report “aims to strengthen professional formation and the ethical practice of researchers and their partners.” Sheeva Sabati, co-editor, explains that “the report’s learning tools, like innovative cases, games, heat maps, and other materials, are designed to cultivate deep engagement with fraught ethical matters.”
The Unsettling Research Ethics report is based on a February 2016 invitational conference hosted by CCREC in Santa Cruz, CA. The conference was an international and intergenerational gathering of scholars in anthropology, archaeology, critical race and ethnic studies, black studies, computer science, education, feminist studies, geography, public health, sociology, and philosophy. The participating scholars engage in work related to research ethics, community-based and collaborative approaches to research, and ethics policy at institutional, professional association, and national levels. Community leaders in attendance had partnered with scholars on projects addressing multiple domains of injustice, including issues related to labor, race, women, immigration, and youth development.
Unsettling Research Ethics provides background on CCREC’s conceptual and pedagogical approaches to ethics, including its notion of ‘dwelling’ within the ethics of research. Additional frameworks and provocative invitations for engaging the ethics of research are offered by Troy Richardson (Cornell University), Joyce E. King (Georgia State University), Rena Lederman (Princeton University), Diane Fujino (University of California, Santa Barbara), Kisha Supernant (University of Alberta), Richa Nagar (University of Minnesota), Caitlin Cahill (Pratt Institute), and George Lipsitz (University of California, Santa Barbara).
Natalie JK Baloy, lead editor of Unsettling Research Ethics, emphasizes that “the report is a resource for professional development for both early career and expert researchers and their collaborators, and offers materials to guide sustained ethical reflection during knowledge production practices.”
Papers by Ronald David Glass
SensePublishers eBooks, 2012
Equity-Oriented Collaborative Community-Based Research is an umbrella term for research methodolo... more Equity-Oriented Collaborative Community-Based Research is an umbrella term for research methodologies, like action research, that engage communities in research processes linked to social justice struggles. The relational character and equity orientation distinguish it from traditional research methodologies, giving rise to complex ethical and epistemic quandaries that are further complicated by the various subject positions and social formations among community and university partners. In this chapter, we especially draw from feminist and critical scholars who have long grappled with the kinds of ethical and epistemological questions that emerge from research rooted in social justice commitments. Our discussion focuses on three interconnected ethical spheres: (1) power and knowledge production, (2) advocacy and research, and (3) the foundations of research ethics—informed consent, confidentiality, and anonymity.
SAGE Publications, Inc. eBooks, Mar 7, 2014
Philosophy of Education, 2008
The March 2008 annual meeting of the Philosophy of Education Society was held in Cambridge, Massa... more The March 2008 annual meeting of the Philosophy of Education Society was held in Cambridge, Massachusetts, at a historical moment barely imaginable only a generation ago, let alone when the elders of the Society came of age in the period between the twentieth century's major World Wars. As we discussed philosophy, the Republican Party was presiding over the (un)intended consequences of its policies and ideology: a global war without end, a collapsing economy, a public education system eviscerated of meaning, a political culture fractured and subverted by lies and media manipulation, a public sphere undermined by privatization and narrowed self-interests, and a proliferation of work without significance or living wages. These realities extended worldwide, forcing their way into regional and local cultures increasingly transformed by the needs of capital. At the same time, the Democratic Party was providing only meek resistance, yet surprisingly was on its way to nominating the first African American to be a major party candidate for president of the United States.
Educational Administration Quarterly, 2021
Purpose: This paper conceptualizes a just leadership learning ecology through an analysis of one ... more Purpose: This paper conceptualizes a just leadership learning ecology through an analysis of one nontraditional site of leadership preparation: the Highlander Research and Education Center (originally founded as the Highlander Folk School). Methodology: Drawing on cultural historical activity theory (CHAT) and institutional theory (IT), we examine the core design and pedagogy of Highlander, which co-founder, Myles Horton, referred to as the “Highlander idea.” Findings: We illustrate how a residential learning and living environment, norms of epistemic humility and democratic decision making, and horizontal teaching and learning roles fostered social justice leadership. This just leadership learning ecology reflected institutions present at the time of Highlander's founding, including cultural scripts rooted in prophetic Christianity, class consciousness, and unfolding social movements in Appalachia and the South. Implications: Our analysis of Highlander extends recent efforts to...
The Palgrave International Handbook of Action Research, 2016
Equity-Oriented Collaborative Community-Based Research is an umbrella term for research methodolo... more Equity-Oriented Collaborative Community-Based Research is an umbrella term for research methodologies, like action research, that engage communities in research processes linked to social justice struggles. The relational character and equity orientation distinguish it from traditional research methodologies, giving rise to complex ethical and epistemic quandaries that are further complicated by the various subject positions and social formations among community and university partners. In this chapter, we especially draw from feminist and critical scholars who have long grappled with the kinds of ethical and epistemological questions that emerge from research rooted in social justice commitments. Our discussion focuses on three interconnected ethical spheres: (1) power and knowledge production, (2) advocacy and research, and (3) the foundations of research ethics—informed consent, confidentiality, and anonymity.
Encyclopedia of Educational Theory and Philosophy
The Multiracial Experience: Racial Borders as the New Frontier
Philosophy of Education
The daily news, from the mainstream journalism of record to that peddling the most disreputable d... more The daily news, from the mainstream journalism of record to that peddling the most disreputable distortions and lies, is filled with a struggle over race and schooling as intense and widespread as seen in decades. Armed rightwing formations of that struggle now threaten bodily harm against teachers, school leaders, and others hoping to teach the tangled truths of the aftermath of slavery and untangle the devastating impact on the lives of the least advantaged communities. Education Week has identified 37 states where Republican Party lawmakers have attempted to restrict how teachers and schools address race and racism in American history, and in 14 of those states they have achieved some success through law and direct imposition by executive or administrative authority-often specifically citing the "ill" effects of "critical race theory" or the "1619 Project" or "ethnic studies." 2 These battles occur alongside the history of how the normal and legitimate processes and ideologies of schooling contribute to the pervasive cultural and material formation of Black youth as dangerous criminals within a dominant society uniquely afraid of Black children. 3 Nearly 70 years after Brown v Board of Education and countless government reports and scholarly studies, most BIPOC youth still suffer the ongoing disinvestment in their school facilities and curricular resources, teacher quality, 4 and extended learning opportunities. 5 These schooling battles and histories also occur alongside the history of state sanctioned murder of Black people. In the year following the police murder of George Floyd in May 2020, U.S. police officers killed 229 Black people ranging in age from three months to 88 years, the majority being male. 6 Even with so many eyes upon them, police set a record in 2021 for fatal shootings
Philosophy of Education, 2017
In my response to Professor Kerdeman’s Presidential Essay, I will first offer a brief summary of ... more In my response to Professor Kerdeman’s Presidential Essay, I will first offer a brief summary of some of its key points about “being pulled up short,” and I will offer a critique that identifies the reach and limits of the position she elaborates by drawing inspiration from former PES President Maxine Greene, critical educator Paulo Freire, and Black Lives Matter activists who have breathed new meaning into the notion of being “woke.” I suggest that the gap between being “pulled up short” and being “woke” can be reduced only through a particular kind of praxis.
Teacher Education Quarterly, 2003
Over the past decade or more, educators and policymakers have sought to define new directions for... more Over the past decade or more, educators and policymakers have sought to define new directions for teacher education in order to ad ■■■■■■■ dress widely perceived failures to prepare teachers Ronald David Glass is an adequately for the challenges to be faced in schools, associate professor in the especially those serving the poor and English learners College of Education at (Clifford & Guthrie, 1988; Goodlad, Soder& Sirotnik, Arizona State University 1990; Holmes Group, 1995; Quartz et al, 2001). As West, Phoenix, Arizona; colleges of education and urban school districts have Pia Lindquist Wong is an established collaborative Professional Development associate professor and Schools (PDSs) to meet the particular needs of under director of the Equity resourced urban schools, they have discovered unex Network in the pected challenges that exacerbate the already difficult Department of Bilingual/ issues that they set out to address. This article investi Multicultural Education gates some...
Urban Education, 2018
This multivocal essay engages complex ethical issues raised in collaborative community-based rese... more This multivocal essay engages complex ethical issues raised in collaborative community-based research (CCBR). It critiques the fraught history and limiting conditions of current ethics codes and review processes, and engages persistent troubling questions about the ethicality of research practices and universities themselves. It cautions against positioning CCBR as a corrective that fully escapes these issues. The authors draw from a range of philosophic, African-centric, feminist, decolonial, Indigenous, and other critical theories to unsettle research ethics. Contributors point toward research ethics as a praxis of engagement with aggrieved communities in healing from and redressing historical trauma.
The University of California Center for Collaborative Research (CCREC) has published an important... more The University of California Center for Collaborative Research (CCREC) has published an important groundbreaking report on the ethics of research: Unsettling Research Ethics. This freely available 120-page report (https://ccrec.ucsc.edu/node/768) addresses critical foundational issues in institutionalized approaches to research ethics. CCREC (https://ccrec.ucsc.edu/) is a UC system-wide initiative that links university researchers, community-based organizations, and policymakers in projects that address the most pressing cross-sector issues in the economy, employment, environment, food systems, housing, pubic health, and education. Unsettling Research Ethics presents a distinctive framework for grappling with the ethics of research in the domains of knowledge, relationality, and space and time. CCREC Director and report co-editor Ron Glass notes that the report “aims to strengthen professional formation and the ethical practice of researchers and their partners.” Sheeva Sabati, co-editor, explains that “the report’s learning tools, like innovative cases, games, heat maps, and other materials, are designed to cultivate deep engagement with fraught ethical matters.” The Unsettling Research Ethics report is based on a February 2016 invitational conference hosted by CCREC in Santa Cruz, CA. The conference was an international and intergenerational gathering of scholars in anthropology, archaeology, critical race and ethnic studies, black studies, computer science, education, feminist studies, geography, public health, sociology, and philosophy. The participating scholars engage in work related to research ethics, community-based and collaborative approaches to research, and ethics policy at institutional, professional association, and national levels. Community leaders in attendance had partnered with scholars on projects addressing multiple domains of injustice, including issues related to labor, race, women, immigration, and youth development. Unsettling Research Ethics provides background on CCREC’s conceptual and pedagogical approaches to ethics, including its notion of ‘dwelling’ within the ethics of research. Additional frameworks and provocative invitations for engaging the ethics of research are offered by Troy Richardson (Cornell University), Joyce E. King (Georgia State University), Rena Lederman (Princeton University), Diane Fujino (University of California, Santa Barbara), Kisha Supernant (University of Alberta), Richa Nagar (University of Minnesota), Caitlin Cahill (Pratt Institute), and George Lipsitz (University of California, Santa Barbara). Natalie JK Baloy, lead editor of Unsettling Research Ethics, emphasizes that “the report is a resource for professional development for both early career and expert researchers and their collaborators, and offers materials to guide sustained ethical reflection during knowledge production practices.”
Uploads
Books by Ronald David Glass
CCREC (https://ccrec.ucsc.edu/) is a UC system-wide initiative that links university researchers, community-based organizations, and policymakers in projects that address the most pressing cross-sector issues in the economy, employment, environment, food systems, housing, pubic health, and education.
Unsettling Research Ethics presents a distinctive framework for grappling with the ethics of research in the domains of knowledge, relationality, and space and time. CCREC Director and report co-editor Ron Glass notes that the report “aims to strengthen professional formation and the ethical practice of researchers and their partners.” Sheeva Sabati, co-editor, explains that “the report’s learning tools, like innovative cases, games, heat maps, and other materials, are designed to cultivate deep engagement with fraught ethical matters.”
The Unsettling Research Ethics report is based on a February 2016 invitational conference hosted by CCREC in Santa Cruz, CA. The conference was an international and intergenerational gathering of scholars in anthropology, archaeology, critical race and ethnic studies, black studies, computer science, education, feminist studies, geography, public health, sociology, and philosophy. The participating scholars engage in work related to research ethics, community-based and collaborative approaches to research, and ethics policy at institutional, professional association, and national levels. Community leaders in attendance had partnered with scholars on projects addressing multiple domains of injustice, including issues related to labor, race, women, immigration, and youth development.
Unsettling Research Ethics provides background on CCREC’s conceptual and pedagogical approaches to ethics, including its notion of ‘dwelling’ within the ethics of research. Additional frameworks and provocative invitations for engaging the ethics of research are offered by Troy Richardson (Cornell University), Joyce E. King (Georgia State University), Rena Lederman (Princeton University), Diane Fujino (University of California, Santa Barbara), Kisha Supernant (University of Alberta), Richa Nagar (University of Minnesota), Caitlin Cahill (Pratt Institute), and George Lipsitz (University of California, Santa Barbara).
Natalie JK Baloy, lead editor of Unsettling Research Ethics, emphasizes that “the report is a resource for professional development for both early career and expert researchers and their collaborators, and offers materials to guide sustained ethical reflection during knowledge production practices.”
Papers by Ronald David Glass
CCREC (https://ccrec.ucsc.edu/) is a UC system-wide initiative that links university researchers, community-based organizations, and policymakers in projects that address the most pressing cross-sector issues in the economy, employment, environment, food systems, housing, pubic health, and education.
Unsettling Research Ethics presents a distinctive framework for grappling with the ethics of research in the domains of knowledge, relationality, and space and time. CCREC Director and report co-editor Ron Glass notes that the report “aims to strengthen professional formation and the ethical practice of researchers and their partners.” Sheeva Sabati, co-editor, explains that “the report’s learning tools, like innovative cases, games, heat maps, and other materials, are designed to cultivate deep engagement with fraught ethical matters.”
The Unsettling Research Ethics report is based on a February 2016 invitational conference hosted by CCREC in Santa Cruz, CA. The conference was an international and intergenerational gathering of scholars in anthropology, archaeology, critical race and ethnic studies, black studies, computer science, education, feminist studies, geography, public health, sociology, and philosophy. The participating scholars engage in work related to research ethics, community-based and collaborative approaches to research, and ethics policy at institutional, professional association, and national levels. Community leaders in attendance had partnered with scholars on projects addressing multiple domains of injustice, including issues related to labor, race, women, immigration, and youth development.
Unsettling Research Ethics provides background on CCREC’s conceptual and pedagogical approaches to ethics, including its notion of ‘dwelling’ within the ethics of research. Additional frameworks and provocative invitations for engaging the ethics of research are offered by Troy Richardson (Cornell University), Joyce E. King (Georgia State University), Rena Lederman (Princeton University), Diane Fujino (University of California, Santa Barbara), Kisha Supernant (University of Alberta), Richa Nagar (University of Minnesota), Caitlin Cahill (Pratt Institute), and George Lipsitz (University of California, Santa Barbara).
Natalie JK Baloy, lead editor of Unsettling Research Ethics, emphasizes that “the report is a resource for professional development for both early career and expert researchers and their collaborators, and offers materials to guide sustained ethical reflection during knowledge production practices.”