Liza Cirolia
Related Authors
Brandon M Finn
University of Michigan
Stephen Berrisford
University of Cape Town
Meine Pieter van Dijk
Erasmus University Rotterdam
Edgar Pieterse
University of Cape Town
Anton Cartwright
University of Cape Town
Sylvia Croese
University of California, Irvine
Uploads
Articles by Liza Cirolia
groups, academics, artists, international funders, built-environment professionals and entrepreneurs all
find the challenge of informality an important project and intriguing frontier for practical and conceptual
intervention. This paper unpacks four discourses which frame understandings of informal settlements and
how they should be addressed. Technology and design discourses, institutional discourses, rights-based
discourses and structural discourses all come to bear on the framing of the debate and the propositions
for change. Within the sector, the various actors and stakeholders continually struggle to acknowledge
the contributions of other discourses. This paper unpacks these discourses and identifies the possible
contributions and limitations each has to offer. The paper draws on empirical evidence from South Africa,
providing insights relevant both to and beyond this context. In conclusion, it is argued that a generous,
multi-scale, interdisciplinary discourse is needed in South Africa and beyond.
foncier à M’Bour (Sénégal) et à Kisumu (Kenya.) Il part du constat que
les autorités fiscales s’abstiennent parfois de prélever cet impôt, alors
qu’elles ont l’obligation légale et l’autorisation de le faire. Dans cet
article, nous questionnerons deux pratiques d’exceptions informelles
à la loi, ainsi que la manière dont elles sont justifiées. À M’Bour,
les administrateurs fiscaux s’abstiennent de prélever l’impôt chez les
propriétaires terriens qu’ils perçoivent comme pauvres. À Kisumu,
les autorités municipales ne prélèvent pas l’impôt foncier dans les zones
de la ville qui ne leur paraissent pas suffisamment bien équipées en
routes, en électricité et en marchés urbains. Ces exceptions sont des
formes de contournement, pratiques par le biais desquelles des agents
de l’État évitent à dessein d’accomplir leurs tâches officielles de service
public dans des endroits spécifiques du paysage urbain. Nous
défendons l’idée que ce contournement constitue en fait une
reconfiguration de l’autorité fiscale de l’État, tant dans sa forme que
dans son inscription spatiale, et que cette reconfiguration concourt
parfois, de manière inattendue, à rendre la fiscalité plus progressive.
come back on the agenda driven by both public and private interests. This paper explores the WesCape Development (WD), a proposed satellite suburb to be located north-west of Cape Town, South Africa. Situating the WD in a longer lineage of utopian and new city planning approaches, I argue that the proposal is deeply flawed. Rather than being the solution to the urban ills facing Cape Town, it is an ‘anti-urban’ strategy which supports suburbanisation and assumes a particular and problematic urban growth scenario. It relies on ‘environmentally deterministic’ assumptions and depoliticised and deinstitutionalised designs. Ultimately, it tries to escape, rather than confront, the operational, political and social challenges of the city leading to the devaluation of planning instruments and citizenship engagement. The WD highlights the importance and power of radical and utopian thinking as well as the necessity of grounding and situating these impulses in the specificities and complexities of the city.
Papers by Liza Cirolia
groups, academics, artists, international funders, built-environment professionals and entrepreneurs all
find the challenge of informality an important project and intriguing frontier for practical and conceptual
intervention. This paper unpacks four discourses which frame understandings of informal settlements and
how they should be addressed. Technology and design discourses, institutional discourses, rights-based
discourses and structural discourses all come to bear on the framing of the debate and the propositions
for change. Within the sector, the various actors and stakeholders continually struggle to acknowledge
the contributions of other discourses. This paper unpacks these discourses and identifies the possible
contributions and limitations each has to offer. The paper draws on empirical evidence from South Africa,
providing insights relevant both to and beyond this context. In conclusion, it is argued that a generous,
multi-scale, interdisciplinary discourse is needed in South Africa and beyond.
foncier à M’Bour (Sénégal) et à Kisumu (Kenya.) Il part du constat que
les autorités fiscales s’abstiennent parfois de prélever cet impôt, alors
qu’elles ont l’obligation légale et l’autorisation de le faire. Dans cet
article, nous questionnerons deux pratiques d’exceptions informelles
à la loi, ainsi que la manière dont elles sont justifiées. À M’Bour,
les administrateurs fiscaux s’abstiennent de prélever l’impôt chez les
propriétaires terriens qu’ils perçoivent comme pauvres. À Kisumu,
les autorités municipales ne prélèvent pas l’impôt foncier dans les zones
de la ville qui ne leur paraissent pas suffisamment bien équipées en
routes, en électricité et en marchés urbains. Ces exceptions sont des
formes de contournement, pratiques par le biais desquelles des agents
de l’État évitent à dessein d’accomplir leurs tâches officielles de service
public dans des endroits spécifiques du paysage urbain. Nous
défendons l’idée que ce contournement constitue en fait une
reconfiguration de l’autorité fiscale de l’État, tant dans sa forme que
dans son inscription spatiale, et que cette reconfiguration concourt
parfois, de manière inattendue, à rendre la fiscalité plus progressive.
come back on the agenda driven by both public and private interests. This paper explores the WesCape Development (WD), a proposed satellite suburb to be located north-west of Cape Town, South Africa. Situating the WD in a longer lineage of utopian and new city planning approaches, I argue that the proposal is deeply flawed. Rather than being the solution to the urban ills facing Cape Town, it is an ‘anti-urban’ strategy which supports suburbanisation and assumes a particular and problematic urban growth scenario. It relies on ‘environmentally deterministic’ assumptions and depoliticised and deinstitutionalised designs. Ultimately, it tries to escape, rather than confront, the operational, political and social challenges of the city leading to the devaluation of planning instruments and citizenship engagement. The WD highlights the importance and power of radical and utopian thinking as well as the necessity of grounding and situating these impulses in the specificities and complexities of the city.
made, interventions to improve the functioning of land markets and address urban poverty should recast the politics of informality and identity as an opportunity for the urban poor to use various forms of capital and association to incrementally and progressively build pathways to urban citizenship. In this process, one should seek to develop tools that support locally contingent negotiation processes and diverse modalities of rights-claiming as a means by which to build more inclusive markets.