Books by Stéphanie Adroit
2021, Actes des IVe rencontres doctorales Internationales de l'EEPB, tenues à Bibracte les 12-13 ... more 2021, Actes des IVe rencontres doctorales Internationales de l'EEPB, tenues à Bibracte les 12-13 mars 2018
HAL Id : halshs-03262380
https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-03262380v1
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
S. Adroit / R. Graells (Eds.), Arquitecturas funerarias y memoria: la gestión de las necrópolis e... more S. Adroit / R. Graells (Eds.), Arquitecturas funerarias y memoria: la gestión de las necrópolis en Europa occidental (ss. X-III a.C.), Actas del encuentro de la Casa de Velázquez 13-14 de marzo de 2014 (Madrid). Archeologia Nuova Serie 4, Osanna Edizioni (Venosa 2017), 426 pp. ISBN 9788881675227.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Papers by Stéphanie Adroit
HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe), Jan 27, 2021
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe), 2021
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bulletins et mémoires de la société d'anthropologie de Paris
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bibracte EPCC, 2021
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
La thématique des « interactions culturelles » est récurrente dans les études actuelles portant s... more La thématique des « interactions culturelles » est récurrente dans les études actuelles portant sur les échanges et les contacts entre les populations protohistoriques européen- nes, mais peu de spécialistes s’attachent à en définir le sens. Cet article s’applique à décrire les différentes manifestations, modalités et conséquences concrètes des interactions cultu- relles d’un point de vue socioculturel et comparatif. Il intro- duit plusieurs concepts attachés aux processus d’échanges dynamiques et aux modes de réception d’éléments exogè- nes au sein des cultures protohistoriques –transfert culturel, acculturation ou encore métissage – son principal objectif étant de faciliter la bonne compréhension du dossier théma- tique proposé ci-après auprès d’un large lectorat. Ce dos- sier, issu d’un séminaire doctoral tenu à Strasbourg le 23 novembre 2012, se compose de sept cas d’étude pour par- tie inédits portant sur des zones insulaires ou périphériques particulièrement favorables aux interactions culturelles. Les différents supports d’étude utilisés par de jeunes chercheurs − éléments architecturaux, céramiques, mobiliers métalli- ques, monnaies ou restes mortuaires − analysés au sein de leur contexte archéologique, apportent un éclairage nouveau sur les interactions entre les peuples européens protohistoriques et sur les nouveaux modèles cultu- rels qui en découlent.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
MARCIGNY C. et MORDANT C. (dir.), Bronze 2019. 20 ans de recherches, Actes du colloque international anniversaire de l’APRAB, Bayeux (19-22 juin 2019), Supplément n°7 au Bulletin de l’Association pour la Promotion des Recherches sur l’Âge du Bronze , OREP, Nonant., 2021
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
: Pierrevelcin G., Kysela J, Fichtl St. (dir.) Unité et diversité du monde celtique, 42e colloque international de l’Association Française pour l’Étude de l’Âge du Fer, (Prague 10 au 13 mai 2018). Afeaf 2, Paris, AFEAF/Prague, Charles University, Faculty of Arts, p. 263-269., 2020
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Aquitania, 2020
Introduction au dossier paru dans le numéro 36 de la revue Aquitania
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Organization meetings by Stéphanie Adroit
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Programme des IVe Rencontres Doctorales de l'Ecole Européenne de Protohistoire de Bibracte, 12-13... more Programme des IVe Rencontres Doctorales de l'Ecole Européenne de Protohistoire de Bibracte, 12-13 mars 2018
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Talks by Stéphanie Adroit
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Jeudi 17 Novembre 2016
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Journée d'étude TRACES (RHAdAMANTE)/UT2J en collaboration avec PLH-CRATA et Ausonius
Autour de l... more Journée d'étude TRACES (RHAdAMANTE)/UT2J en collaboration avec PLH-CRATA et Ausonius
Autour de la tombe princière de Lavau. De l'individu au collectif : Nouvelles données et nouvelles approches en archéologie funéraire de la Protohistoire.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Call for Papers by Stéphanie Adroit
Keywords:
identity, diachrony, methodology, material culture, conceptual approach, artefacts
Sub... more Keywords:
identity, diachrony, methodology, material culture, conceptual approach, artefacts
Submission:
https://eaa.klinkhamergroup.com/eaa2023/sessions/contribution/?clean=1
Abstract:
Identity is a concept continuously mobilised when dealing with archaeological remains and models. Nevertheless, the identity is characterised by a constellation of definitions. In a general sense, it can be understood as the subjective difference – and the mutual recognition of this difference – by two or several individuals (or groups of individuals). Therefore, the identity is above all characterised by abstract discourse, without objective material manifestations.
In such a framework, the archaeological sciences face a paradox dealing with “identity(ies)” with material proxies they select themselves. The archaeological markers used to talk about the identity are nonetheless numerous: languages, funerary practices, tools of the production and consumption, etc. But what evidence exactly brings these archaeological markers about identity? Are we talking about collective identity (ethnic groups, lineages, communities…) or individual identity (gender, social class, function in the society…). Moreover, are these concepts prevailing in ancient societies or just transpositions of our own identity classification in the past?
In this session, we would like to discuss the identity as an archaeological concept and tool, essential to our studies, but also its limitations. We aim to raise a methodological discussion on how to define and question the material culture and its link with archaeological markers. Namely, why and how specific archaeological data brings to talk about identity from a methodological point of view. In a diachronic approach, we want to interrogate the epistemological process that allows us to deal with identity in archaeology. The papers dealing with methodological and conceptual approaches will be given priority over simple case studies. The idea is to encourage speakers to come up with their own proposals, definitions or interrogations about identity, in order to create a benevolent open debate on doubts and methodological questions.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Uploads
Books by Stéphanie Adroit
HAL Id : halshs-03262380
https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-03262380v1
Papers by Stéphanie Adroit
Organization meetings by Stéphanie Adroit
Talks by Stéphanie Adroit
Autour de la tombe princière de Lavau. De l'individu au collectif : Nouvelles données et nouvelles approches en archéologie funéraire de la Protohistoire.
Call for Papers by Stéphanie Adroit
identity, diachrony, methodology, material culture, conceptual approach, artefacts
Submission:
https://eaa.klinkhamergroup.com/eaa2023/sessions/contribution/?clean=1
Abstract:
Identity is a concept continuously mobilised when dealing with archaeological remains and models. Nevertheless, the identity is characterised by a constellation of definitions. In a general sense, it can be understood as the subjective difference – and the mutual recognition of this difference – by two or several individuals (or groups of individuals). Therefore, the identity is above all characterised by abstract discourse, without objective material manifestations.
In such a framework, the archaeological sciences face a paradox dealing with “identity(ies)” with material proxies they select themselves. The archaeological markers used to talk about the identity are nonetheless numerous: languages, funerary practices, tools of the production and consumption, etc. But what evidence exactly brings these archaeological markers about identity? Are we talking about collective identity (ethnic groups, lineages, communities…) or individual identity (gender, social class, function in the society…). Moreover, are these concepts prevailing in ancient societies or just transpositions of our own identity classification in the past?
In this session, we would like to discuss the identity as an archaeological concept and tool, essential to our studies, but also its limitations. We aim to raise a methodological discussion on how to define and question the material culture and its link with archaeological markers. Namely, why and how specific archaeological data brings to talk about identity from a methodological point of view. In a diachronic approach, we want to interrogate the epistemological process that allows us to deal with identity in archaeology. The papers dealing with methodological and conceptual approaches will be given priority over simple case studies. The idea is to encourage speakers to come up with their own proposals, definitions or interrogations about identity, in order to create a benevolent open debate on doubts and methodological questions.
HAL Id : halshs-03262380
https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-03262380v1
Autour de la tombe princière de Lavau. De l'individu au collectif : Nouvelles données et nouvelles approches en archéologie funéraire de la Protohistoire.
identity, diachrony, methodology, material culture, conceptual approach, artefacts
Submission:
https://eaa.klinkhamergroup.com/eaa2023/sessions/contribution/?clean=1
Abstract:
Identity is a concept continuously mobilised when dealing with archaeological remains and models. Nevertheless, the identity is characterised by a constellation of definitions. In a general sense, it can be understood as the subjective difference – and the mutual recognition of this difference – by two or several individuals (or groups of individuals). Therefore, the identity is above all characterised by abstract discourse, without objective material manifestations.
In such a framework, the archaeological sciences face a paradox dealing with “identity(ies)” with material proxies they select themselves. The archaeological markers used to talk about the identity are nonetheless numerous: languages, funerary practices, tools of the production and consumption, etc. But what evidence exactly brings these archaeological markers about identity? Are we talking about collective identity (ethnic groups, lineages, communities…) or individual identity (gender, social class, function in the society…). Moreover, are these concepts prevailing in ancient societies or just transpositions of our own identity classification in the past?
In this session, we would like to discuss the identity as an archaeological concept and tool, essential to our studies, but also its limitations. We aim to raise a methodological discussion on how to define and question the material culture and its link with archaeological markers. Namely, why and how specific archaeological data brings to talk about identity from a methodological point of view. In a diachronic approach, we want to interrogate the epistemological process that allows us to deal with identity in archaeology. The papers dealing with methodological and conceptual approaches will be given priority over simple case studies. The idea is to encourage speakers to come up with their own proposals, definitions or interrogations about identity, in order to create a benevolent open debate on doubts and methodological questions.