Giuma Fellah
Interested in exergy and thermoeconomic analysis of thermal systems
less
Related Authors
Hassan Soroush Rabbani
University of Tehran
HAITHAM ELHEJAJI
Universty Of Tripoli
Sandra Vaiciulyte
City, University of London
InterestsView All (27)
Uploads
Papers by Giuma Fellah
The total exergy destruction is not only due the deficiency of that component, but also occurs by the deficiencies of the remaining components. The endogenous exergy destruction takes place when the other components of the system work perfectly without any exergy destruction, and the considered component works with its normal condition. Splitting the total exergy destruction into endogenous and exogenous parts must be considered when decision is made to enhance the thermodynamic performance of a system. The exergy destruction can be split into an avoidable and unavoidable exergy destruction, each of them can be split into an endogenous and exogenous exergy destruction. Only part of the exergy destruction can be avoided, the remaining cannot be avoided due to economic issues and technological limit.
The results show that for the compressor, 82% of the exergy destruction is endogenous and 18% is exogenous exergy destruction, for the gas turbine, 96.6% of the exergy destruction is endogenous and 3.4% is exogenous exergy destruction and for the combustion chamber, 69.60% of the exergy destruction is endogenous and 30.40% is exogenous exergy destruction. That is, 75.82 MW of the exergy destruction in the combustion chamber is exogenous, hence the performance of the other two components (compressor and turbine) must be improved or replaced to elevate the thermodynamic performance of the combustion chamber. The later finding cannot be recognized without splitting the total exergy destruction into endogenous and exogenous exergy destruction.
emitted to the atmosphere. The aim of this work is to reduce this amount and contribute to the clean environment issues. According to this study, the rate of the emitted CO2 is reduced to 0.3888 kg/s, and to 0.4085 kg/s, when CO2 removal cycle is connected to the simple gas turbine cycle and to the combined gas-steam cycle, respectively.
compared with the corresponding conventional effectiveness and exergoeconomic factor. A simple gas turbine cycle is taken as an example to explore the advantages of such approach to give a rational judgment of the performance of thermal systems. The results show that, for the whole plant the conventional exergoeconomic factor is calculated as 16.15% and the conventional effectiveness as 24.67%, while the modified exergoeconomic factor is calculated as 36.85%, and the modified effectiveness as 40.14%
The total exergy destruction is not only due the deficiency of that component, but also occurs by the deficiencies of the remaining components. The endogenous exergy destruction takes place when the other components of the system work perfectly without any exergy destruction, and the considered component works with its normal condition. Splitting the total exergy destruction into endogenous and exogenous parts must be considered when decision is made to enhance the thermodynamic performance of a system. The exergy destruction can be split into an avoidable and unavoidable exergy destruction, each of them can be split into an endogenous and exogenous exergy destruction. Only part of the exergy destruction can be avoided, the remaining cannot be avoided due to economic issues and technological limit.
The results show that for the compressor, 82% of the exergy destruction is endogenous and 18% is exogenous exergy destruction, for the gas turbine, 96.6% of the exergy destruction is endogenous and 3.4% is exogenous exergy destruction and for the combustion chamber, 69.60% of the exergy destruction is endogenous and 30.40% is exogenous exergy destruction. That is, 75.82 MW of the exergy destruction in the combustion chamber is exogenous, hence the performance of the other two components (compressor and turbine) must be improved or replaced to elevate the thermodynamic performance of the combustion chamber. The later finding cannot be recognized without splitting the total exergy destruction into endogenous and exogenous exergy destruction.
emitted to the atmosphere. The aim of this work is to reduce this amount and contribute to the clean environment issues. According to this study, the rate of the emitted CO2 is reduced to 0.3888 kg/s, and to 0.4085 kg/s, when CO2 removal cycle is connected to the simple gas turbine cycle and to the combined gas-steam cycle, respectively.
compared with the corresponding conventional effectiveness and exergoeconomic factor. A simple gas turbine cycle is taken as an example to explore the advantages of such approach to give a rational judgment of the performance of thermal systems. The results show that, for the whole plant the conventional exergoeconomic factor is calculated as 16.15% and the conventional effectiveness as 24.67%, while the modified exergoeconomic factor is calculated as 36.85%, and the modified effectiveness as 40.14%