
Julie Ren
Related Authors
Eugene Brennan
University of London
Ben Iaquinto
The University of Hong Kong
Nicole J Wilson
University of Manitoba
Teresa Montoya
University of Chicago
Alex A Moulton
Hunter College, CUNY
Universitas-XX1: Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanas
Universidad Politécnica Salesiana
Kim Snepvangers
Southern Cross University
Ola Söderström
University of Neuchâtel
Sobia Ahmad Kaker
Goldsmiths, University of London
Hanna Hilbrandt
The Open University
InterestsView All (19)
Uploads
Books by Julie Ren
Across vastly different contexts, where universal theories of modernity or development seem increasingly misplaced, she innovatively explores the ways that art spaces employ creative capital to sustain themselves in a competitive urban landscape.
She shows how these art spaces are embedded within a politics of aspiration and demonstrates that aspiration is an important lens through which to understand the nature of, and possibilities for, urban change.
Papers by Julie Ren
Across vastly different contexts, where universal theories of modernity or development seem increasingly misplaced, she innovatively explores the ways that art spaces employ creative capital to sustain themselves in a competitive urban landscape.
She shows how these art spaces are embedded within a politics of aspiration and demonstrates that aspiration is an important lens through which to understand the nature of, and possibilities for, urban change.
This SGM Panel invites research papers addressing these issues and related questions such as: to what extent do events create insular environments, removed from broader societal unrest? Are they bubbles of exclusivity or do they reflect changing attitudes towards travel, for instance in the adaptations of hybrid formats or online platforms? How do these adaptations affect ecosystems built around events in cities that were developed with in-person events in mind? Are they trying to learn the lessons from the previous crises? Who are the event participants, attendees and audiences and what does their constancy or change reflect about the nature of events? We explicitly encourage contributions from research conducted since 2020, investigating event geographies at different scales, in a range of geographical sites, and employing different creative or digital methods.
Abstracts submission: Please send your abstract of max 300 words to both David Gogishvili david.gogishvili@unil.ch and Julie Ren julie.ren@uzh.ch AND submit it through the SGM platform at https://geoscience-meeting.ch/sgm2023/abstracts/abstract-submission-form/
The pervasive nature of ongoing, perpetual crises seems to convert it from an event with a clear end towards a definitive condition of urban life. Distinctions between crisis and a broader sense of uncertainty are becoming increasingly blurred. The distribution of actually existing geographies of crisis complicates the dichotomous portrayal of extraordinary crisis as an event triggering action in some places and ordinary crisis that must be coped with in other places. Instead, inaction reigns, and the ubiquity of precarious life facilitates new epistemological possibilities by bringing distant/different cities into relational dialogue (Massey, 2011). With "everyday crisis" we aim to compile perspectives on the experience of this condition. Beyond the emerging scholarship on survivalism (See e.g., Tsing, 2015; Barker, 2020), we invite papers that address the question of how this condition is experienced, and explore what the inaction buries within it. For instance, how can coping be framed in terms of avoidance, disconnection, distanciation, anesthetization (Bissell, 2021), stuckedness (Hage, 2009) or diminishing expectations (Battacharyya, 2015)? What is the implication of these detachments for understanding the broader consequences of everyday crisis on crisis-shaped subjectivities (Berlant, 2011) or collective lives (Bhan et al., 2020)? How could these seemingly passive framings of coping that entail non-heroic, banal or less visible forms of agency facilitate a different reading of resistance? How is time segmented and punctuated, and how does the irregularity of events, these intermittent disruptions, shape experiences of temporality (i.e., presentness, ongoiness)? How do these experiences of temporality in turn shape feelings of crisis or crisis atmospheres? We welcome papers addressing any of these questions and hope to bring into dialogue a range of approaches: ethnographic, conceptual/theoretical, affective/psychoanalytic and creative/visual.