Britta Ohm
Precarious researcher
less
Related Authors
Manjur Ali
Giri Institute of Development Studies (GIDS)
Ram Puniyani
Center for Study of Society and Secularism
Khalid Anis Ansari
Glocal University
Zaheer Baber
University of Toronto
Shamsher Alam
Jawaharlal Nehru University
Yasmeen Jahan
Jawaharlal Nehru University,New Delhi,India
Sanober Umar
York University
Shrey Kapoor
Cornell University
Pushpendra Kumar
Tata Institute of Social Sciences
InterestsView All (82)
Uploads
Books by Britta Ohm
Researched under this impression of mediated real violence, this thesis provides, firstly, an analysis of the interplay of transnational media corporations, particularly Rupert Murdoch's Star TV, in their pursuit of creating profitable national consumer markets, preferably in a democracy like India, with the anti-minority politics, modes of popular/populist mobilisation and discursive strategies of Hindu nationalism. It looks at the economic, technological, medial, political, social, visual/iconographic and legal aspects of this interplay and delineates their concrete manifestations in news as well as in entertainment programming of everyday television (particularly in very popular shows and channels at the time). These aspects are set into the larger framework of globalisation, privatisation, commercialisation and neo-liberal policies, the related thrusts of social upward mobility (especially in the new middle classes), ‘good governance’ (instead of socio-economic justice) and shifting class-, caste-, majority-minority and national-regional relations in the context of a re-formulation of nation and state that defines and legitimises new logics of inclusion and exclusion.
Secondly, this work is a study of "Indianisation" and lingual/representational politics in the context of the growing precariousness of the liberal-secular discourse and of democratic, independent mass media in India. Especially English-language journalists, whose largely critical coverage of the anti-Muslim violence experienced an hitherto unknown rejection on the part of TV audiences (and consequently produced a slump in advertising revenues), turned with the Gujarat crisis out to epitomise the ambivalence of challenging the definitional power of a privileged postcolonial class: its rightful critique carries the danger of vindicating and naturalising anti-minority cultural nationalism. The study follows and examines, before the background of a normative construction of a Hindi-speaking, ‘authentic’ media consumer, the changing position of both English and Hindi-producing journalists and producers, their respective perceptions of alienation, speechlessness and empowerment, their unwanted role as activists in the context of shifting meanings of 'neutrality' and 'objectivity', their difficulties or agility in assessing their options and maintaining, changing or even developing their convictions, and the strategies they find or reject for adapting to the circumstances.
In this context, thirdly, this book engages in a critical debate of anthropological assessments of globalisation and media change and theories of postcolonialism on the one hand and conventional modes of ethnography on the other hand. It attempts to show the 'blind spot' of the mutual linkage between Hindu nationalism and economic liberalisation in the approaches specifically of Arjun Appadurai and the Subaltern Studies Group and argues for a stronger reflection and consideration in anthropological research on the cooperation between ‘the global’ and ‘the local’ in terms of disabling and anti-emancipatory mechanisms rather than focussing mainly on aspects of empowerment and negotiation of identity. At the same time it proposes, by introducing an ‘ethnographic moment’ instead of the ‘ethnographic present’, a flexibility in ethnography that is aware of its increasingly ephemeral character and that takes account of the pace of change in the media as well as of the grown likelihood, in a global era of post-traditional wars and genocidal politics, of the field researcher to be confronted with incalculable situations of conflict and violence.
Papers by Britta Ohm
While academic freedom has been a top agenda point for the global scientific community in recent years, the public and academic discourse has often been marked by a negative interpretation of the term understood merely as exemption from state intervention and censorship. The contributions in this edited volume demonstrate, however, that this is not where the story ends: the ability to exercise academic freedom not only involves the freedom of expression in its abstract sense but should involve the capability to determine research agendas and curricula independently from market pressures or threats of career sabotage, and to resist workplace misconduct without fear of losing future career chances.
Providing a differentiated picture of contemporary structural limits to academic freedom in advanced democracies, this volume will be of great interest for not only scholars of higher education, but for the entire academic community.
and political lives of populations ( Foucault 1997 ), rather than outright agitating against them, Modi resorted to a neoliberal ‘biopolitics of disposability’ ( Giroux 2008 ) that rendered Muslims, lower castes, and the poor superfluous.
Veröffentlichungstitel: "Exzellente Entqualifizierung: Das neue akademische Prekariat"
https://www.blaetter.de/archiv/jahrgaenge/2016/august/exzellente-entqualifizierung-das-neue-akademische-prekariat
Keywords: anthropology, media contents, social change, technology, time
https://www.westminsterpapers.org/25/volume/9/issue/3/
Researched under this impression of mediated real violence, this thesis provides, firstly, an analysis of the interplay of transnational media corporations, particularly Rupert Murdoch's Star TV, in their pursuit of creating profitable national consumer markets, preferably in a democracy like India, with the anti-minority politics, modes of popular/populist mobilisation and discursive strategies of Hindu nationalism. It looks at the economic, technological, medial, political, social, visual/iconographic and legal aspects of this interplay and delineates their concrete manifestations in news as well as in entertainment programming of everyday television (particularly in very popular shows and channels at the time). These aspects are set into the larger framework of globalisation, privatisation, commercialisation and neo-liberal policies, the related thrusts of social upward mobility (especially in the new middle classes), ‘good governance’ (instead of socio-economic justice) and shifting class-, caste-, majority-minority and national-regional relations in the context of a re-formulation of nation and state that defines and legitimises new logics of inclusion and exclusion.
Secondly, this work is a study of "Indianisation" and lingual/representational politics in the context of the growing precariousness of the liberal-secular discourse and of democratic, independent mass media in India. Especially English-language journalists, whose largely critical coverage of the anti-Muslim violence experienced an hitherto unknown rejection on the part of TV audiences (and consequently produced a slump in advertising revenues), turned with the Gujarat crisis out to epitomise the ambivalence of challenging the definitional power of a privileged postcolonial class: its rightful critique carries the danger of vindicating and naturalising anti-minority cultural nationalism. The study follows and examines, before the background of a normative construction of a Hindi-speaking, ‘authentic’ media consumer, the changing position of both English and Hindi-producing journalists and producers, their respective perceptions of alienation, speechlessness and empowerment, their unwanted role as activists in the context of shifting meanings of 'neutrality' and 'objectivity', their difficulties or agility in assessing their options and maintaining, changing or even developing their convictions, and the strategies they find or reject for adapting to the circumstances.
In this context, thirdly, this book engages in a critical debate of anthropological assessments of globalisation and media change and theories of postcolonialism on the one hand and conventional modes of ethnography on the other hand. It attempts to show the 'blind spot' of the mutual linkage between Hindu nationalism and economic liberalisation in the approaches specifically of Arjun Appadurai and the Subaltern Studies Group and argues for a stronger reflection and consideration in anthropological research on the cooperation between ‘the global’ and ‘the local’ in terms of disabling and anti-emancipatory mechanisms rather than focussing mainly on aspects of empowerment and negotiation of identity. At the same time it proposes, by introducing an ‘ethnographic moment’ instead of the ‘ethnographic present’, a flexibility in ethnography that is aware of its increasingly ephemeral character and that takes account of the pace of change in the media as well as of the grown likelihood, in a global era of post-traditional wars and genocidal politics, of the field researcher to be confronted with incalculable situations of conflict and violence.
While academic freedom has been a top agenda point for the global scientific community in recent years, the public and academic discourse has often been marked by a negative interpretation of the term understood merely as exemption from state intervention and censorship. The contributions in this edited volume demonstrate, however, that this is not where the story ends: the ability to exercise academic freedom not only involves the freedom of expression in its abstract sense but should involve the capability to determine research agendas and curricula independently from market pressures or threats of career sabotage, and to resist workplace misconduct without fear of losing future career chances.
Providing a differentiated picture of contemporary structural limits to academic freedom in advanced democracies, this volume will be of great interest for not only scholars of higher education, but for the entire academic community.
and political lives of populations ( Foucault 1997 ), rather than outright agitating against them, Modi resorted to a neoliberal ‘biopolitics of disposability’ ( Giroux 2008 ) that rendered Muslims, lower castes, and the poor superfluous.
Veröffentlichungstitel: "Exzellente Entqualifizierung: Das neue akademische Prekariat"
https://www.blaetter.de/archiv/jahrgaenge/2016/august/exzellente-entqualifizierung-das-neue-akademische-prekariat
Keywords: anthropology, media contents, social change, technology, time
https://www.westminsterpapers.org/25/volume/9/issue/3/
The article critically and in global perspective elaborates on the intrinsic linkages between the fixation on the professorship as the single permanent post in the German university system, the tragic fallouts of the state-initiated program of scientific excellence, and the refusal to pay salaries to university teachers. It argues that the thwarting of solidarity and unionism amongst scholars, the discouragement of unpredictable (open, 'risky') research (especially in the arts, humanities and social sciences) and the eventual enforced de-qualification of mass produced underemployed academics have become the indispensable and unconstitutional underbelly of the German government's rhetoric of the 'international battle for the best brains'. It is because academia is under attack on a global scale - for different reasons in different contexts - that the advertising machinery of the the German government is able to sell a sorry state for a viable option.
16-19 July 2019, University of Leiden, Netherlands
https://icas.asia
16-19 July 2019, University of Leiden, Netherlands
https://icas.asia
https://www.sasnet.lu.se/conferences/modern-matters-negotiating-the-future-in-everyday-life-in-south-asia-2016/accepted-panels
"Many of us have made and continue to make disenchanting experiences, to say the least, in the German academic system. While it markets itself as a world of excellence, liberal egalitarianism, cosmopolitanism, freedom and generosity towards scholars at risk, the reality of its structural labour conditions and culture of ignorance betray this image to be a grotesque misrepresentation. German academia is characterised by an ingrained and almost cultivated lack of consciousness towards multiple forms of discrimination (based on race, class, gender, age, etc.) and by related modalities of exclusion as well as paternalistic and infantilizing norms and practices particularly vis-à-vis international and non-naturalized scholars and students. [...]
As a part of this effort, this workshop wants to bring together scholars, unionists and activists with different histories of mobility and migration to discuss and refect on the intersection between precarious labour conditions and different forms of discrimination in the German academic system. We want to come together and learn from each other in order to come to a better analysis of the different problems and challenges faced by differently positioned scholars and activists, but also to exchange experiences and knowledges over struggles for academic freedoms and labour conditions in different contexts. The aim is both to position the question of labour in academia within broader societal struggles in Germany and to link it up to related struggles in other countries."
Vollständige Verwendung der Hochschulpaktmittel für Dauerstellen!
http://frististfrust.net/?fbclid=IwAR0eBird8C9siwdALxOBwL_8TKjIigIknBMDYqG30HZFDEI4WZO6FjSkk1w
Zeichnet die Petition hier (ab 01. März 2019):
https://www.openpetition.de/petition/online/frist-ist-frust-entfristungspakt-2019
Ein Podcast der Theologischen Fakultät der Universität Zürich. Produziert in Zusammenarbeit mit der Podcastschmiede.