Ben Fitzhugh
Related Authors
Ben Fitzhugh
University of Washington
Chris Lockwood
University of Washington
Colby Phillips
University of Washington
Jago Cooper
University of East Anglia
Mark Hudson
Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History
InterestsView All (17)
Uploads
Talks by Ben Fitzhugh
These samples can be used to investigate issues well beyond traditional social science, in fields like biology or paleoclimatology. New techniques make it possible to examine factors such as trophic levels, changes in stock structure, population bottlenecks, and movements of animal populations across both space and time.
It is possible not only to reconstruct ecosystems, but to see how they changed through time, and correlate those changes with possible drivers, such as climate change, changes in human exploitation, or natural catastrophes. This can provide critical information to those trying to manage fisheries or wildlife and to those whose food security depends on successful hunting and foraging.
Arctic sites have been considered stable. However, the changing climate has altered the situation. As the ground warms, factors leading to decay of organic materials (bacteria, mold and chemical processes) all are active for longer periods of the year, at much higher intensity. At a certain point, this becomes a positive feedback loop. Coastal sites are particularly threatened. Erosion rates have increased tremendously, due to warming permafrost, sea ice retreat and longer ice-free seasons. Loss rates of 10s of meters per year have been recorded in some places. These valuable paleoecological archives are disappearing before our eyes.
1) Loss of key elements of cultural heritage to environmental change
2) Loss of the rich paleoenvironmental records that form a “distributed long term observing network of the past”
In recent years archaeological sites with good organic preservation have been recognized as excellent paleoenvironmental archives which complement the proxy records recovered from ice sheets, bogs, lakes, and oceanic sediments. Data from archaeological sites can be used to address key questions in social science, conservation biology, oceanography, ecology, and climatology. It is possible not only to document human interactions with the environment, but also to see how they change through time, and then correlate those changes with possible drivers, such as climate change, patterns of human exploitation, natural catastrophes (volcanic eruptions, large-scale flooding, etc.). Archaeological deposits provide key data on changes in summer drift ice in the North Atlantic, of the distribution and population structure of sea mammals prior to modern industrial hunting, and the effects of large scale fishing prior to the disciplinary establishment of fisheries science.
The poster also covers emerging responses to this issue. The scale and urgency of the threat will require a large-scale response backed by significant sustained funding support. Existing structures for archaeological rescue and response are already overwhelmed, and conditions are worsening. It is clear that we cannot expect existing research-orientated local and national funding agencies to support the sort of response needed from already-strained social science budgets. New models for funding, education and recruitment of staff, engagement with the public and long term curation of rescued samples must be developed.
Papers by Ben Fitzhugh
These samples can be used to investigate issues well beyond traditional social science, in fields like biology or paleoclimatology. New techniques make it possible to examine factors such as trophic levels, changes in stock structure, population bottlenecks, and movements of animal populations across both space and time.
It is possible not only to reconstruct ecosystems, but to see how they changed through time, and correlate those changes with possible drivers, such as climate change, changes in human exploitation, or natural catastrophes. This can provide critical information to those trying to manage fisheries or wildlife and to those whose food security depends on successful hunting and foraging.
Arctic sites have been considered stable. However, the changing climate has altered the situation. As the ground warms, factors leading to decay of organic materials (bacteria, mold and chemical processes) all are active for longer periods of the year, at much higher intensity. At a certain point, this becomes a positive feedback loop. Coastal sites are particularly threatened. Erosion rates have increased tremendously, due to warming permafrost, sea ice retreat and longer ice-free seasons. Loss rates of 10s of meters per year have been recorded in some places. These valuable paleoecological archives are disappearing before our eyes.
1) Loss of key elements of cultural heritage to environmental change
2) Loss of the rich paleoenvironmental records that form a “distributed long term observing network of the past”
In recent years archaeological sites with good organic preservation have been recognized as excellent paleoenvironmental archives which complement the proxy records recovered from ice sheets, bogs, lakes, and oceanic sediments. Data from archaeological sites can be used to address key questions in social science, conservation biology, oceanography, ecology, and climatology. It is possible not only to document human interactions with the environment, but also to see how they change through time, and then correlate those changes with possible drivers, such as climate change, patterns of human exploitation, natural catastrophes (volcanic eruptions, large-scale flooding, etc.). Archaeological deposits provide key data on changes in summer drift ice in the North Atlantic, of the distribution and population structure of sea mammals prior to modern industrial hunting, and the effects of large scale fishing prior to the disciplinary establishment of fisheries science.
The poster also covers emerging responses to this issue. The scale and urgency of the threat will require a large-scale response backed by significant sustained funding support. Existing structures for archaeological rescue and response are already overwhelmed, and conditions are worsening. It is clear that we cannot expect existing research-orientated local and national funding agencies to support the sort of response needed from already-strained social science budgets. New models for funding, education and recruitment of staff, engagement with the public and long term curation of rescued samples must be developed.
(Saarbrücken: Lambert Academic Publishing, 2011)
The notion of evolution is not popular in contemporary Anthropology. Many researchers do not use it preferring to write about transformation,
transit, or change. Evolution for them is synonymous to dogmatic understanding of human history (Yoffee 2005; Pauketat 2008). However,
even critics of evolutionism do not appear to reject= the very fact of continuous social change. In prehistory people were hunters and gatherers and were integrated in small bands. Later some of them experienced sedentarization and transition to food production, began to found towns and invent complex tools. It would be ridiculous to reject such changes. Another point is that contemporary vision of cultural transformations differs greatly from the naïve ideas of the 19th century evolutionists (see, e.g., Earle 2002; Claessen 2000; Carneiro 2003, Marcus 2008; Hanks, Linduff 2009; Earle, Kristiansen 2010 etc.). Contemporary approaches are more flexible and are based on a much more considerable set of evidence. That is why it would be wrong to criticize the scholars of the past for their knowledge of something worse than ours. They ought to be estimated in comparison with their contemporaries. So, we believe that the notion of evolution has a right to exist, and for already several decades we have been elaborating the ideas that can be called “new wave evolutionism”, or multievolutionism (non-linear evolution theory).
The first edition of the present volume was published over ten years ago, in 2000, in two languages, English and Russian (under the Альтернативные пути к цивилизации [Alternative pathways to the civilization] title given by the publisher for commercial reasons). It was the response of the then young generation of post-Soviet anthropologists in league with prominent Western and Russian scholars to dogmatic Marxist interpretations of older, Soviet ethnologists and archaeologists (see also Korotayev, Chubarov 1991; Kradin, Lynsha 1995). Several other collective edited volumes (Bondarenko, Korotayev 2000; Kradin, Bondarenko, Barfield 2003; Grinin et al 2004; Bondarenko, Nemirovsky 2007; Grinin, Beliaev, Korotayev 2008 etc.), monographs (Korotayev 1995; 1996; 2003; Bondarenko 2001; 2006; Korotayev et al 2006; Kradin, Skrynnikova 2006; Grinin 2007; Kradin 2007; 2010; Grinin, Korotayev 2009) and journal articles (Beliaev, Bondarenko, Korotayev 2001; Kradin 2002; Bondarenko, Korotayev 2003; Bondarenko 2007a; 2007b) have appeared since then. Five “Hierarchy and Power in the History of Civilizations” international conferences held in Moscow and St. Petersburg between 2000 and 2009 turned out very important for elaboration of the non-linear sociocultural evolution theory. The Social Evolution & History English-language journal published in Russia since 2002 has become a venue for discussion of the non-linear evolution theory, ideas and evidence related to it. In particular, besides an impressive number of separate articles, the following special issues and sections, among others, have been published in it: Exploring the Horizons of Big History (2005, Vol. 4, No 1), Thirty Years of Early State Research (2008, Vol. 7, No1), The Early State in Anthropological Theory (2009, Vol. 8, No 1), Analyses of Cultural Evolution (2009, Vol. 8, No 2), Urbanization, Regional Diversity and the Problem of State Formation in Europe (2010, Vol. 9, No 2). One more discussion, Chiefdoms in the process of social evolution: theory, problems and comparative studies, is to appear in
the Journal soon (was published in 2011 as Vol.10, Iss. 1. - D.B.).
Alternatives of Social Evolution consists of five parts. The first part includes theoretical studies of non-linear evolution. Articles on the alternative pathways of the prehistoric societies’ evolution form the volume’s second part. The evolutionary pathways of complex societies and state origins are the topics of the volume’s third and forth parts. The closing part is devoted to nomadic societies. We hope that the book has not lost its relevance and will remain in demand by readers."