Gerard B. Hawkins
Managing Director
•
The aim of this presentation is to
Give an understanding of
◦
◦
◦
◦
◦
Best practices
Sock Loading
Unidense
Pressure Drop Measurement
Common Problems
Use approved drum handling techniques
Do not roll drums
Do not lift on forks of fork lift truck
Do not stack more than 4 high - even on
pallets
Protect from rain and standing water
Keep lids on
Do not expose to temperature extremes
•
•
Before loading
Inspect vessel for stress damage
Check conditions of thermocouples
– Document their location
with respect to inlet flange or tangent line
•
•
Check support balls for breakage or
extraneous materials
Check support grids for condition (e.g.,
damaged clips; grid binding)
•
During charging
– Use appropriate personnel protection
•
•
Dust masks
Gloves
Full body coverage
Fresh air in vessels
Support workers in reactors with boards
Snow shoes
During charging
– Use hopper or supersack with attached sock
– Ensure uniform distribution by moving sock
– Maximum catalyst freefall 3ft (1m)
– Minimum catalyst freefall 1ft (.3m)
– Helps ensure dense loading
•
Aim is to achieve
Same flow through each tube
◦ No hot tubes
•
No bridging
◦ No hot spots
•
Ultimately
◦ Minimize methane slip
◦ Extends tube life
•
Inspection
Check tubes for defects using LOTISTM or eddy
current etc
•
Internal surfaces - Look smooth
•
Catalyst support grids are in place
•
Inlet and exit pigtails are not blocked
•
Procedure is
◦ Only have one type of catalyst on
the steam reformer at any one time
◦ Ensure sock “rope” is longer than
catalyst tube
◦ Anchor free and of rope, or fit object
• to prevent rope falling into tube
◦ One end sealed for attachment of
lowering rope
◦ Other end folded over - 10cm (4”)
flap
◦ Calculate weight per sock to give
whole number of socks per tube
•
•
•
•
•
Sock OD should be 20mm
(3/4”) smaller than tube ID
Filled sock length should be
around 150cm (5’)
Socks material is canvas,
polythene or similar
Fill socks with same known
weight
Label socks for different types
of catalyst
Folding Over
Attaching Rope
Filling Tubes
Jerking Rope
Topping Up
Checking Outage
Compressed air
Hand
valve
Inlet
pressure
Orifice
plate
Catalyst
pressure
drop
Cam and lever
to expand bung
Guide
ring
Catalyst
tube
Cam and lever
to expand bung
Developed by Hydro Agri of Norway
Proprietary technique available through a select number of
licensees
Widely practiced - more than 260 steam reformer charges
have been loaded using this technique
Leads to “denser” packing
– less pd variation
more uniform gas flows
– easier procedure
shorter loading time (70%)
– slightly higher pd
effect on throughput - marginal
Catalyst drum
Move rope upwards
Charging hopper
Inlet pigtail
Catalyst tube
Brushes
Outlet pigtail
Aim to pack catalyst to uniform voidage
Measure pd
– Not outage in tube at any one time
– Not weight per tube
– Not catalyst density
– After 50%
– After full loading
Use defined and consistent procedure
throughout
Fixed flow of air (choked flow through
orifice)
Mass flowrate through orifice function of
◦ upstream pressure
◦ orifice diameter (known)
◦ temperature (known)
Downstream pressure is measure of pd
P1
P2
Orifice
•
•
•
For air, the critical value of P2 is around 50%
of P1
If flow is sonic, then mass flow is constant
Resistance to flow downstream (pd) can be
read now as P2 value
Flow must be sonic to obtain meaningful
results
◦ requires a minimum upstream/downstream
pressure ratio
◦ check upstream pressure adequate
If using a shared air supply, monitor pressure carefully
- other users can lead to a drop in supply pressure.
PD rig
PD rig
PD rig
Inlet pigtail
Empty tube
catalyst
catalyst
Exit pigtail
4a. Exit pigtail
4b. Catalyst
4c. Inlet pigtail
If too high then
– suck out catalyst and recharge
If too low then
– Vibrate tube
– Use a soft faced hammer
– Top up if outage too great
Voids
Stacking
Voids
Voids
Voids
Broken Pellet
40
10
30
20
5
10
0
0
-10
-5
-20
-10
-15
-30
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
Pressure Drop Variation (%)
15
20
-40
Tube Temperature Variation (°C)
Flow Variation (%)
15
•
If loading is poor
• variety of flows in tubes
•
Each tube has different exit temperature
◦
◦
◦
◦
◦
◦
Each tube has a close approach
Mixture of all tubes far from equilibrium
Methane slip not linear with temperature
Methane slip higher than it should be
Tube temperature distribution
Some tubes will be hot
• Therefore fail sooner
◦ Operational costs - High Slip
◦ Maintenance costs - Failed tubes
Well
Balance
Poorly
Balance
Mixed Gas
Exit
Reformer
Process Gas Exit
Temp
(°C)
(°F)
870
1598
834 - 992
1533 - 1692
872
1602
Methane/Steam
Approach
(°C)
(°F)
2
3
1-3
1-5
9
16
3.6
1.6 - 6.5
3.9
891
1636
860 - 930
1580 - 1706
Methane Slip
Max twt
(% dry)
(°C)
(°F)
Charging tube
More larger particles
low pressure drop
high pressure drop
Catalyst Support
Support Grid
•
This means that there is
◦ A high voidage at the walls
◦ A low voidage in the center
•
This will cause flow mal-distribution
◦ More flow at walls
◦ Less in the centre
•
Will cause a shortened life
“Bridging”
Tiger
Tailing
Giraffe
Necking
Not enough
catalyst, or
overcompaction
and breakage
Settling
Overcompacted
Outage
(Pressure Drop)
Correctly
Settled
Amount of vibration or
hammering
Two methods:
– Vacuum from top
Most desirable form informational standpoint
Costly
Difficult if catalyst pyrophoric
– Bottom dump
Faster
Cheaper
Nickel containing catalyst
– Potential for nickel carbonyl
– Formed by CO reacting with Ni
– Stable below 200oC (390oF)
Use a device as illustrated below
15cms
Clip
Hose
Mesh
Vacuum
System