Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
…
8 pages
1 file
Modern economic development sometimes disrupts nature’s delicate balance. The extent of environmental pollution caused by humans is already so great that some scientist question whether the Earth can continue to support life unless immediate corrective action is taken. If left undisturbed, natural environmental systems tend to achieve balance or stability among the various species of plants and animals. Much of the world’s air, water and land are now partially poisoned by chemical wastes. Some places have become inhabitable. These pollution exposes people all around the globe to new risks from disease. As a result of these developments, governments have passed laws to limit or reverse the threat of environmental pollution. The 19th century, industrial revolution placed greater pressures on the environment. Although industrial development through the control of nature and development of new products improved the standard of living of humans, this was at a great environmental cost.
Anu Books, 2022
The Earth's environment lends the most favourable conditions for different forms of life to exist. In our environment, there is a very delicate balance between all the elements like breathing air in the form of oxygen, clean water, cultivable land which produces food items for us etc. Unfortunately, this delicate balance is getting terribly disturbed by the contamination of natural resources like air, water, soil etc. Our environment is eroding very fast due to reckless pollution caused by mankind in the name of development. We all have knowingly or unknowingly contributed to pollution in some way or the other. A single family living in a metropolitan city dumps more than a ton of garbage every year. Most of this is plastic waste which is not recycled at all like mineral water bottles or soft drink bottles. At this moment, we are posing the greatest threat to our sustaining environment. Degrading our environment at this speed is like marching on a suicide mission. The global warming, ozone layer degradation, contamination of our water bodies, pollution of the air and excessive noise pollution are the things that are affecting and deep impacting to our surrounding and environment.
International Journal of Innovative Scientific Research, 2024
When examining the impact of civilization on the environment, it becomes evident that technology has significantly altered natural ecosystems. As societies moved from farming to industrial economies, the need for resources grew, causing significant harm to the environment. This shift led to more people moving into cities and increased use of nearby natural resources. According to research by Iwona Czerwińska Pawluk and her team, the results of these changes are serious, showing up as habitat destruction, pollution, and climate issues (E A. et al. Pleshko). The use of new technologies has not only made productivity better but has also worsened the ecological effects of human actions, highlighting a major conflict between development and sustainable practices. Moreover, research shows that the link between economic growth and its environmental impact is not straightforward but rather circular. Although progress often brings short-term improvements in environmental quality—like better waste management systems and renewable energy—over time they tend to follow old patterns of overusing resources and damaging ecosystems. Studies reveal that, despite increased awareness and attempts to address issues, the lasting effects of years of industrialization still endanger biodiversity and the health of ecosystems (A. V. et al., Meshcheryakova). This complicated relationship calls for a rethink of how we measure growth, leading to a push for more sustainable methods and rules that value conservation as well as human advancement. The key issue is striking a balance between meeting the needs of a growing global population and protecting the environment. Development often prioritizes immediate benefits over the long-term health of ecosystems, which can lead to unfavorable outcomes. To lessen the negative impacts shown in recent studies, communities need to create comprehensive plans that include environmental factors in their economic and social systems. This means revising how we consume resources, encouraging sustainable tech, and building a sense of environmental responsibility throughout society. As emphasized in these studies, only by understanding the connections between civilization and nature can humanity move toward a future where both can prosper sustainably.
Routledge Handbook of Political Ecology (HOPE), 2015
Industrialization is one of the great markers for periodizing socio-ecological relations. It describes the second major ecological transition in the history of humankind, the first being the shift from hunting and gathering to agriculture that occurred in the Neolithic . Industrialization is credited with driving the emergence of the 'Anthropocene', a term which likens the past 250 years to a geological era characterized by the ability of humans to alter geo-ecological processes on a global scale, and exemplified by the anthropogenic forcing of atmospheric CO 2 from 280 to 400 ppm . Such readings of industrialization, however, highlight material transformations at the world-scale, and overlook equally significant processes of geographical and social differentiation. Since its inception in the second half of the eighteenth century in the English countryside, industrialization has been a continuous process of socio-ecological transformation and differentiation that has simultaneously pulverized and re-constituted social and geographical relations across all spatial scales. By accelerating the appropriation of raw materials and generation of wastes , commodifying labour and land, and remaking human bodies through the consumption of industrial goods (Chapter 43, this volume) and exposure to radioactive, metal and persistent organic pollutants (Boudia and Jas 2014, Higgins 2010, , industrialization may be considered a form of 'slow violence' (Nixon 2011) that both reproduces and transforms inequalities in economic and political power. Given industrialization's wrenching socioecological transformations -and the complex narratives, norms and subjectivities that variously sustain and query the social relations of which it is productive -it is somewhat surprising that political ecology has paid industry only limited attention. For the most part, political ecology has approached industrialization obliquely, and one needs to look to the field's fluid borderlands with environmental history, environmental sociology and ecological economics to find a more sustained engagement.
For the past several centuries, humanity has been increasingly polluting air and water, altering Earth’s climate, eroding the soil, fragmenting and eliminating the habitat of plants and animals, and depleting the natural bank account of nonrenewable resources. Of especially great long-term concern, we are as a consequence simultaneously degrading the capacity of natural ecosystems to regenerate or maintain renewable resources and ecosystem services, such as the provision of clean air and water, the control of flooding, the maintenance of a tolerable climate, the conservation and regeneration of fertile soil, and the preservation of genetic and other forms of biological diversity. The significance of environmental factors to the health and well-being of human populations’ is increasingly apparent (Rosenstock 2003; World Health Organization, 2010b). Environment pollution is a worldwide problem and its potential to influence the health of human populations is great (Fereidoun et al, 2007; Progressive Insurance, 2005.). Pollution reaches its most serious proportions in the densely settled urban-industrial centers of the more developed countries (Kromm, 1973). In poor countries of the world more than 80% polluted water have been used for irrigation with only seventy to eighty percent food and living security in industrial urban and semi urban areas. (Mara & Cairncross, 1989).
2020
Environment and mankind are interdependent and inter-related branches that have been understood by the man from different angles at different times. What our forefathers deciphered about the environment is not what we understand about the environment in the present era. The environment is never static and the studies on the environment also have taken meandering turns. There are several recognized scientific bodies that monitor and studies the environment. These organizations bring out regular reports revealing the status of our environment in all corners of the world. The present chapter is an endeavour to highlight the changes in our environment over the decades through the works of writers and activists topped up with a brief knowledge on documented reports that throw light on the environmental aspects. These reports can be well analyzed opening new vistas for further research.
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2015
An interesting problem is the analysis of effects of the predominant impact of technological change on the health of societies. This study considers technological change as the human activity that generates a huge impact on societies and causes environmental disorders affecting the health of population. In particular, technical innovations support the industrialisation and human development, which by a social change based on population growth, mass production and consumption, and resources depletion, engenders pollution and several environmental carcinogens. This study shows that a main effect of the critical impact of technological change on societies is the high cancer incidence of population living in industrialised areas of opulent and advanced countries. Vital empirical evidence and linkages between observed facts endeavour to explain the major relationships concerning the interactions among technology, ecosystems and the health of societies.
Economic and Business Trends Shaping the Future, 2022
Man, as a natural being, modifies the ecosystems of which he is an integral part, but this does not diminish his obligation to leave the environment to his descendants, at least in the state in which he "got it for use" from his ancestors. The growth trend observed in the field of extraction of natural resources, global population, gross domestic product and waste disposal is the basis for the development of the global environmental crisis, which is caused by unreasonable and irresponsible human behavior towards nature and its resources. The ecological crisis, as a disturbance and threat to the balance of the natural and social components of the environment and consequently human existence, is a trend that is intensively influencing the shaping of life in the 21st century. Unsustainable use of natural resources in combination with continuous increase in waste causes concern for human survival and requires immediate transformation and transition from dominant economic models based on linear patterns of production, consumption and disposal, to closed-loop models-circular models. The process of harmonization of technological progress and economic growth and development, with the goals of preserving the quality of the environment, has developed the need to build the innovative potential of the economy and apply the principles of sustainable development, as a strategic commitment of almost all countries in the 21st century. In this regard, a change in worldview-the development of environmental knowledge is necessary and is the primary goal in establishing the optimal, interaction of man and nature. The aim of the work is to point out the negative consequences of irresponsible behavior towards the environment and natural resources.
International Refereed Research Journal ■ w ww ww w. .r re es se ea ar rc ch he er rs sw wo or rl ld d. .c co om m ■ Vol.