Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Einstein's argument is wrong

Einstein's argument is wrong

The theory of relativity is based on one single argument: the behavior atomic clocks. These clocks are regarded to be so perfect that they can prove that time itself can change its own speed. This remarkable property is called dilation of time. So, we have a reason to ask if we really can trust these clocks to that extent. In this context an existent ether seems to be needed.

Einstein’s argument is wrong John-Erik Persson The theory of relativity is based on one single argument: the behavior atomic clocks. These clocks are regarded to be so perfect that they can prove that time itself can change its own speed. This remarkable property is called dilation of time. So, we have a reason to ask if we really can trust these clocks to that extent. In this context an existent ether seems to be needed. Atomic clocks Bound electrons are assumed to move with speed in relation to the ether around an atom moving with the speed in relation to the ether. For 2-way light we would have a reduction of orbiting frequency proportional to: But bound electrons move in 1 dimension of 2 in relation to the ether. So, we get instead: / So, we have found that the frequency of an atomic clock is not constant, but instead changing in a way that is approximately the same as the prediction (time dilation) by SRT: √(1-) Since This relation can be used for GRT also, if escape velocity is used instead of gravity potential. Conclusion Classical physical concepts explain how frequency in atomic clocks depends on the ether wind. This dependency has the right magnitude to create the illusion of time dilation.