International Journal of Advanced Research in
Management and Social Sciences
ISSN: 2278-6236
Impact Factor: 5.313
TEACHING BEHAVIOR OF INSTRUCTORS/PROFESSORS OF KALINGA-APAYAO
STATE COLLEGE
Leo B. Roman*
Abstract: The study focused on the teaching behavior of instructors/professors of KalingaApayao State College.The respondents of the study were the five hundred forty seven (547)
graduating students of Kalinga-Apayao State College, Tabuk City, Kalinga.The questionnaire
was the primary instrument used in the gathering of the needed data and information in
response to the questions raised in the study. The descriptive method of research was used.
Likewise, the weighted mean and analysis of variance were the statistical tools used in the
study. The study found that as a whole, the instructors/professors manifest their teaching
behavior moderately along principles and methods of teaching .It follows that were no
significant differences in the perceptions of the respondents on the extent by which the
instructors/professors manifest their teaching behavior moderately along principles and
methods of teaching when grouped as to age, gender, and college affiliation.As shown on
the table, the instructors/professors manifest their teaching behavior moderately along the
aversive teacher behavior. It was observed that there were no significant differences in the
perceptions of the respondents on the extent by which the instructors/professors manifest
their teaching behavior along aversive teacher behavior when grouped as to age, gender
and college affiliation.As reflected in the table, the teachers manifest their teaching
behavior moderately along the knowledge of the subject matter .Likewise, there are no
significant differences in the perceptions of the respondents on the extent by which the
instructors/professors manifest their teaching behavior along knowledge of the subject
matters along variables of age, gender and college affiliation. As gleaned, the
instructors/professors manifests their teaching behavior moderately along the personal
teacher characteristics .However, there were no significant differences in the perceptions of
the respondents on the extent by which the instructors/professors manifest their teaching
behavior along personal teacher characteristics when grouped as to age, gender, and
college affiliation.The teacher manifests their teaching behavior moderately along the
motivational teacher behavior , there were no significant differences on the extent by which
the instructors/professors manifest their teaching behavior along the motivational teacher
behavior when grouped as to age, gender and college affiliation.
*Kalinga State University
Vol. 5 | No. 1 | January 2016
www.garph.co.uk
IJARMSS | 312
International Journal of Advanced Research in
Management and Social Sciences
ISSN: 2278-6236
Impact Factor: 5.313
INTRODUCTION
Behavior is anything that a living creature actually does. The word often refers to acts that
other persons can observe if they happen to be present. Actually, all responses and ways of
acting are behaviour. These include a person’s thoughts, emotions, feelings, needs, and a
behavior, and so is being inspired to high ideals by listening to a lovely song. Behavior that
can be observed is called explicit behavior, and the other type is known as implicit behavior.
Habits play a large part in all human behavior. People usually continue doing what they are
used to do as long as they possibly can. Habit training is particularly important to children.
Good behavior is very important to young children as they grow older, other factors help
determine their behavior. Their interests and their desires are especially important. Children
often find that two good habits if the father tells her to answer the door and say that he is
not home. A boy who has made a habit of thrift and has also made it a habit not to argue
with older people may be in trouble if a grocer short-changes him. For adults and children,
good behavior means choosing among behavior possibilities rather than merely being able
to behave. This involves learning a set of values to guide behavior. For such reasons, many
educators believe that the development of values, judgment, and intelligence in children is
most important to good behavior in the long run. (World Book Encyclopedia)
The Psychologist can change the behavior of human and animals’ process of training. If a
teacher or parent knows exactly how he wants a child to act in certain situations, he can
usually train the child to do what is wanted. A child can be trained to address his father as
“sin”, or never to interrupt when his father is talking. He can also be trained to respect his
father. Sometimes the child may fail to show an attitude of respect, but still feel respect.
Some educators think that behavior is less important that what goes on inside the person.
In order that there is an effective teaching-learning situation in the classroom,the teacher
requires competence and commitment. The teacher should academically prepared,
competent in both subject matter and classroom methodologies, and highly motivated to
keep on improving himself/herself.(Nadal&Battung)Effectiveness in directing learning
activities in the classroom depends on the type of a teacher, which states
“The teachers can go through their daily routine
or verbal expressive performatory behavior and
have a certain degree of success, but excellence
Vol. 5 | No. 1 | January 2016
www.garph.co.uk
IJARMSS | 313
International Journal of Advanced Research in
Management and Social Sciences
ISSN: 2278-6236
Impact Factor: 5.313
in teaching requires more than going through motions”(Rudyard).
The teacher as a professional is true scholar; he/she is serious and efficient in his/her work;
he/she is orderly, objective and human democratic (Gregorio). As a true scholar, he/she
demonstrates mastery of subject matter; he/she is being serious and efficient, and
competent in the presentation of his/her lessons because he will equip with appropriate
methods, techniques and teaching aids. The teacher also a model, a friend and a motivator
to his students.
And teacher must be dedicated and committed their works (stenson) points out that,
“Teachers who are dedicated can have a
lifelong, directed practice and word ...
these habitual powers of mind we call
“virtues”: sound judgment, is sense of
responsibility, preserving toughness,
self-mastery and moral respect for the
rights and responsibilities of everyone.”
With many responsibilities the teacher does in the development of the child, the teacher
should provide the needs of the teachers in attaining the goals of the teaching profession
which is quality education for all.
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
Competency has come toused to describe the attributes necessary for effective
performance. It can be highly specific as use specifically in a person, or it can be generic that
is general for in any organization. Some organizations use competence as the touchstone for
the whole human resources system so that recruitment, appraisal and trainings and
development are all based on a common standard of effective performance. It will become
apparent that the requirements for effective categories such as described in three
interdependent, overlapping categories such as knowledge, skills, and attitudes. For
example, the effectively performing teacher could be said to need knowledge of the lessons.
Competence in performance sometimes tends to be considered mainly in terms of
professional aspect. But the personal qualities that on employees brings to a job many make
all the difference between success and failure of what use to the administration, for
example, is the employee who is professionally most proficient member of the work group,
Vol. 5 | No. 1 | January 2016
www.garph.co.uk
IJARMSS | 314
International Journal of Advanced Research in
Management and Social Sciences
ISSN: 2278-6236
Impact Factor: 5.313
but at the same time has a disruptive influence because of an uncooperative attitudes and
surely demeanor and is constant source of friction with colleagues and clients?
The criteria for effective performance are established by the process known as job analysis.
The literature and practice of the subject indicates the use of variously named
specifications. Sometimes the same definition is known by different names. Semantic
distinctions are unimportant, however, is practice, two important specifications are
required: one to describe the job, its component task and circumstances; the other to
describe the requirements for effective performance. There are called the job description
and the other is specification.
The person specification may sometimes include “appearance” as a heading, whichhas
become much less important now than it was formerly. There are, however, some
occupations where the perceptions of clients about employees’ appearance. However,
biased and old-fashioned still need to be considered because of possible adverse effects on
business and relationships. Any requirements include heading “health” may vary
considerably from one organization to other. In some occupations, such as the armed
forces, police and teaching profession, the standards of health required are necessary
stringent and high.
The job description and the person specification are both necessary and complementary
definitions. Of the two, however, the person specification is especially important, since it
provides the criteria for assessing effective performance.
Because all jobs in various ways require knowledge, skills, appropriate attitudes and
personal attributes, it is sound practice to use this framework as the initial basis for
analyzing the job in terms of the person specification.(Tyson & York, 2010).
The task of the teacher is complex and many-sided and demands a variety of human traits,
abilities and competencies. It is task that calls for an assessment of one’s own personal
qualification and genuine desire to improve professionally (Lardizabal et. al.).
This study is based on the concept that effective teaching is made up of several factors like
knowledge of the students and familiarity with methods and techniques of teaching.
Effective teaching is made up of several factors like knowledge of the subject matter,
personal characteristics of the teacher, trainings and experiences, knowledge of the learners
and familiarity with methods and techniques of teaching-learning.
Vol. 5 | No. 1 | January 2016
www.garph.co.uk
IJARMSS | 315
International Journal of Advanced Research in
Management and Social Sciences
ISSN: 2278-6236
Impact Factor: 5.313
Knowing once ability of the learners help teacher to prepare his/her lessons carefully which
easily understand by the learners. In this case teacher becomes a facilitator in teachinglearning process in the classrooms which leads to quality education.
STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM
The study looks into the teaching behavior of Instructors/Professors of Kalinga-Apayao State
College.
1. To what extent do the faculty manifest their teaching behavior along:
a. Principles and method of teaching,
b. Aversive teacher behavior,
c. Knowledge of the subject matter,
d. Personal teacher behavior,
e. Motivational teacher behavior.
2. Are there significant differences in the perceptions of the respondents on the extent
by which teachers manifest their teaching behaviors as to age, gender, and institute
affiliation?
SCOPE AND DELIMITATION OF THE STUDY
The focus of the study is on the teaching behavior profile of the Instructors/professors of
the Kalinga-Apayao State College.
It is delimited only on the extent by which teachers manifest their teaching behavior along
principles and methods of teaching, aversive teacher behavior, knowledge of the subject
matter, personal teacher characteristics and motivational teacher behavior.
RESEARCH DESIGN
The descriptive method was used for the study gathered descriptive information about the
teaching behavior of the instructors/professors of Kalinga-Apayao State College, through the
teacher behavior inventory. It Analyzed and described the teaching behavior, knowledge of
the subject matter; personal teacher behavior and motivational teacher behavior.
POPULATION OF THE STUDY
The respondents of the study were the five hundred forty seven (547) graduating students
of the entire college which include the high school department.
Vol. 5 | No. 1 | January 2016
www.garph.co.uk
IJARMSS | 316
International Journal of Advanced Research in
Management and Social Sciences
ISSN: 2278-6236
Impact Factor: 5.313
Table 1 present the population of the study by age.
Age
Frequency
16 – 20
21 – 25
26 & above
Total
192
261
94
547
Percentage
(%)
35.11
47.71
17.18
100.00
Rank
2
1
3
The table shows that of the five hundred forty seven (547) respondents, the majority of
them belong to the age group to 21 to 25 years old. It is composed of two hundred sixty one
(261) students or 47.71. Second in the grouping of 16 to 20 years old which is one hundred
ninety two (192) or 35.11 percent. The least number of respondents is those ages are 26
years and above. There are ninety four (94) students or 17.88 of the total study population.
Table 2 presents the population of the study by Gender.
Age
Frequency
Male
Female
Total
195
352
547
Percentage
(%)
35.65
64.35
100.00
Rank
2
1
Among the five hundred forty seven (547) students. Three hundred fifty two (352) of them
are females or 64.35 percent. While one hundred ninety five (195) students are males or
35.65 percent.
Table 3 presents the population of the study by institute affiliation.
Age
Frequency
High School
Information, Engineering and Technology
Agriculture and Forestry
Teacher Education
Business Administration and Entrepreneurship
Liberal Arts
Total
90
25
55
100
117
167
547
Percentage
(%)
16.40
4.20
10.04
18.10
21.12
30.11
100.00
Rank
4
6
5
3
2
1
There is a total of five hundred forty seven (547) graduating students were chosen as
respondents of the study. Ninety (90) students or 16.40 percent belongs to the high school;
twenty-five (25) or 4.20 percent belong to the information engineering technology; fifty five
Vol. 5 | No. 1 | January 2016
www.garph.co.uk
IJARMSS | 317
International Journal of Advanced Research in
Management and Social Sciences
ISSN: 2278-6236
Impact Factor: 5.313
(55) or 10.04 percent belongs to the agriculture and forestry; one hundred (100) or 18.10
percent belong to the teacher education; one hundred seventeen (117) or 21.12 percent
belong to the business administration and entrepreneurship; one hundred ten (167) or
30.11 percent belong to the liberal arts.
RESEARCH INSTRUMENT
The questionnaire was the primary instrument in gathering data and information.The
questionnaire consisted two major parts:
Part I dealt with the extent by which the instructors/professors manifest their teaching
behavior along the principles and methods of teaching, aversive teacher, knowledge of the
subject matter, personal teacher characteristics, and motivational teacher behavior.
DATA GATHERING PROCEDURES
The researcher sought a written permit to conduct and gather data from the dean of the
different institutes. To gather accurate responses, he personally floated the inventory of the
teachers to the graduating students from one class to other and explained the items they
could not understand and after that the retrieval was done.
TREATMENT OF DATA
To quantify the responses of the respondents, the researcher used the five-Point Likert
Scale.
Scale
5
4
3
2
1
Limits
4.21-5.00
3.41-4.20
2.61-3.20
1.81-2.60
1.00-1.80
Description
Manifest Very Much
Manifest Much
Manifest Moderately
Manifest Less
Do not Manifest
Symbol
MVM
MM
MoM
ML
DNM
STATISTICAL TOOLS USED
The following statistical tools were used to measure the responses of respondents on the
teaching behavior of the instructors/Professors.Weighted Mean. This determined the
perceptions of the teachers and the students on the extent by which the instructors exhibit
the teaching behavior (Da leon). Analysis of Variance. (ANOVA) It will used to test the
significant differences in the perceptions of the respondents in the light of the moderator
variables (Sevilla).
Vol. 5 | No. 1 | January 2016
www.garph.co.uk
IJARMSS | 318
International Journal of Advanced Research in
Management and Social Sciences
ISSN: 2278-6236
Impact Factor: 5.313
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
The Extent by which the Teachers Manifest their Teaching Behavior along Principles and
Methods of Teaching. (N=547)
Principles and Methods of Teaching
MVM(5) MM(4) MoM(3) ML(2)
NM(1) Mean Description
1. The faculty make favorable or assuring 80(400) 115(460) 189(567) 82(164) 81(81) 3.05 Manifest
comments when students give correct
Moderately
answer of sensible ideas
2. The faculty present learning materials 80(400) 112(448) 190(570) 65(130) 100(100) 3.01 Manifest
in proper order which is understandable
Moderately
3. The faculty give example and 85(425) 112(448) 190(570) 65(130) 90(90) 3.04 Manifest
illustrations of the subject matter
Moderately
4. The Faculty show relation of the 100(500) 90(360) 100(300) 107(214) 150(150) 2.78 Manifest
subject matter of the present lesson to
Moderately
the previous lesson
5.The Faculty show relation of the 97(485) 105(420) 200(600) 65(130) 80(80) 3.13 Manifest
subject matter to real life or out of class
Moderately
situation
6. The faculty provide brief summary of 100(500) 160(640) 90(270) 82(164) 105(105) 3.06 Manifest
the lesson toward the end of the class
Moderately
period
7. The faculty provide clear instructional 135(675) 102(408) 107(321) 73(146) 130(130) 3.07 Manifest
objectives, the attainment of which can
Moderately
be observed and measured
8. The faculty adjust method of 100(500) 115(460) 101(303) 131(262) 100(100) 2.97 Manifest
instruction to student’s learning abilities
Moderately
9. The faculty stress important points or 90(450) 115(460) 100(300) 167(334) 75(75) 2.95 Manifest
aspects of the subject matter by
Moderately
repeating or underlining them or giving
them more time than less important one
10. The faculty try out if students have 100(500) 90(360) 115(345) 124(248) 118(118) 2.87 Manifest
learned the subject matter by making
Moderately
questions or encouraging students to ask
questions
11. The faculty use interesting teaching 97(485) 105(420) 110(330) 85(170) 150(150) 2.84 Manifest
technique
Moderately
12. The faculty crack appropriate or 90(450) 85(340) 200(600) 82(164) 90(90) 3.0 Manifest
relevant jokes
Moderately
Total Average Weighted Mean
2.98 Manifest
Moderately
The instructors/professors showed relation of the subject matters to real life or out of class
situation obtained the highest mean of 3.13 or interpreted as manifest moderately. It
implies that the instructors/professors site concrete examples to real life explaining the
lessons. The instructors/professors showed relation of the present lessons to the previous
lessons obtained the lowest mean of 2.78 or interpreted as manifestations moderately. It
implies that the instructors/professors go directly to the lessons without corroborating the
past lessons to the new lessons in their classes.
Vol. 5 | No. 1 | January 2016
www.garph.co.uk
IJARMSS | 319
International Journal of Advanced Research in
Management and Social Sciences
ISSN: 2278-6236
Impact Factor: 5.313
Rank third is the instructors/professors used interesting teaching techniques with an
obtained mean of 2.84 or interpreted as manifest moderately. It implies that the
instructors/professors sometimes do not change their techniques in delivering the lessons in
their classes.
The instructors/professors made favorable or assuring comments when students give
correct answers with sensible ideas obtained a mean of 3.05 or interpreted as moderately
manifest; the instructors/professors provide clear instructional objectives, the attainment of
which can be observed or measured obtained a mean of 3.07 or manifest moderately; the
instructors/professors adjust method of instruction to students learning abilities obtained a
mean of 2.97 or manifests moderately.
The instructors/professors stress important points or aspects of the subject matters by
repeating or underlining them or giving more time then less important ones obtained a
mean of 2.95 or interpreted as manifest moderately; the instructors/professors try out if
students have learned the subject matters by making questions or encouraging students to
ask questions obtained a mean of 2.87 – manifest moderately; the instructors/professors
crack appropriate or relevant jokes obtained a mean of 3.0 or manifest moderately.
The extent by which the instructors/professors manifest their teaching behavior along the
principles and methods of teaching as to moderator variables of age. The respondents who
belong to age brackets to 26 and above and 21 to 25 years perceived than those who belong
to 16 to 20 as shown by the means of 3.06, 2.98 and 2.90, respectively. Although all the
obtained means are interpreted as “manifests moderately”.
The summary of the ANOVA on the extent by which the instructors/professors manifest
their teaching behavior along the principles and methods of teaching as to age. Is the F-ratio
of 2.7586 is far below than the F-tabular value of 4.15 at .05 level of significance. This
indicates no significant differences in the perceptions of the respondents as to variable of
age. The null hypothesis than which states that there are significant differences in the
perceptions of the respondents on the extent by which the instructors/professors manifest
their teaching behavior along the principles and a method of teaching is accepted.In short,
the respondents, regardless of age, all behavior along the principles and methods of
teaching.
Vol. 5 | No. 1 | January 2016
www.garph.co.uk
IJARMSS | 320
International Journal of Advanced Research in
Management and Social Sciences
ISSN: 2278-6236
Impact Factor: 5.313
The extent by which instructors/professors manifest their teaching behavior along the
principles and methods of teaching as to gender. Both means obtained fall within similar
equivalent description of “manifest moderately”. However, the mean obtained for the
females which is 3.02 is slightly higher than the mean of 2.94 obtained by the male students.
This is attributed to the traits of male that they just keep quiet while females are so vocal in
expressing their feelings and emotions.
The summary of ANOVA on the extent by which the instructors/professors manifests the
teaching behavior along the principles and methods of teaching behavior along the
principles and methods of teaching as to gender. The F-ratio of 0.9819 is less than the Ftabled value of 4.20, therefore the null hypothesis which states that there are no significant
differences on the extent by which the instructors/professors manifests their teaching
behavior along the principles and methods of teaching as to gender, is accepted. In short,
gender does not affect the perceptions of the respondents on the extent by which the
teachers manifest their teaching behavior along the principles and methods of teaching.
The extent by which teachers manifest their instructors/professors behavior along the
principles and methods of teaching as to college affiliation. The College of Arts and Sciences
obtained a higher mean of 3.19 than the Colleges with a description of manifest moderately.
Second in rank is the College Teacher Education of obtained a mean of 3.16 with a
description of manifest moderately. Rank third is the College Entrepreneurial Arts have a
mean of 2.98 which a manifest moderately, Engineering and technology gave a mean of 2.80
or manifest moderately; College of Agriculture in Forestry gave a mean of 2.80 or manifest
moderately; and lastly the High School with a mean a 2.76 or manifest moderately.
The summary of ANOVA on the extent by which instructors/professors manifest their
teaching behavior along the principles and methods of teaching as to college affiliation.The
F-computed yielded a ratio of 0.9767, which is lower than the F-tabled value of 2.35 at .05
level of significance. This led the researcher to accept the null hypothesis which states that
there are no significant differences in the perceptions of the respondents on the extent by
which the instructors/professors manifest their teaching behavior along the principles and
methods of teaching as to College Affiliation.
The Extent by which the Teachers Manifest their Teaching Behavior along Aversive Teacher
Behavior. (N=547)
Vol. 5 | No. 1 | January 2016
www.garph.co.uk
IJARMSS | 321
International Journal of Advanced Research in
Management and Social Sciences
Aversive Teacher Behavior
MVM(5)
1. The faculty destructively criticize 31(155)
students for giving wrong answer
2. The faculty keep on reminding 29(145)
students about their undesirable
behavior
3. The faculty vary on change the 30(150)
tone of his voice when speaking
4. The faculty show mannerism or 28(140)
behavior which are distracting
5. The faculty lose temper in class as 27(135)
indicated by such behavior as
shouting or throwing
6. The faculty talk other people’s 38(190)
secret in class
7. The faculty embarrass or insult 31(155)
students
Total Average Weighted Mean
ISSN: 2278-6236
Impact Factor: 5.313
MM(4) MoM(3) ML(2)
NM(1) Mean Description
180(720) 135(405) 170(347) 31(31) 3.02 Manifest
Moderately
95(380) 208(624) 175(350) 40(40) 2.81 Manifest
Moderately
190(760) 116(348) 160(320) 51(51) 2.97
91(364) 156(468) 175(350) 97(97) 2.60
181(734) 130(390) 169(338) 50(50) 2.99
80(320) 167(501) 171(342) 91(91) 2.64
175(700) 102(348) 174(348) 65(65) 2.88
2.84
Manifest
Moderately
Manifest
Moderately
Manifest
Moderately
Manifest
Moderately
Manifest
Moderately
Manifest
Moderately
It implies that the instructors/professors of Kalinga-Apayao State College seldom possess
their mannerism inside the classrooms upon delivering their lessons to the students. The
instructors/professors vary on change the tone of their voice when speaking obtained a
mean of 2.97, interpreted as manifest moderately. However, what is important is when
instructors/professors lose temper in class as indicated by such behavior as shouting or
throwing things obtained a mean of 2.99 or manifest moderately; the instructors/professors
embarrass of insult students obtained a mean of 2.88 or manifest moderately; the
instructors/professors keep on reminding students about their undesirable behavior
obtained a mean of 2.81 or manifest moderately and lastly, the instructors/professors talks
about other people’s secrets in class obtained a mean of 2.64, interpreted as manifest
moderately.
The extent by which the Instructors/Professors manifest their Teaching Behavior along the
Aversive Teacher Behavior as to age. The respondents who belong to age brackets to 26 and
above and 21 to 25 years perceived higher than those belong to 16 to 20 as shown by the
means of 2.88, 2.84, and 2.80 respectively. Although all the means are interpreted as
“manifest moderately”.
The summary of ANOVA on the extent by which the instructors/professors manifest their
teaching behavior along the aversive teacher behavior as to age. The table shows that the Fratio of 2.3417 is far below the F-tabular value of 3.15 at .05 level of significance. This
Vol. 5 | No. 1 | January 2016
www.garph.co.uk
IJARMSS | 322
International Journal of Advanced Research in
Management and Social Sciences
ISSN: 2278-6236
Impact Factor: 5.313
indicates no significant differences in the perceptions of the respondents on the extent by
which the instructors/professors manifest their teaching behavior along the aversive
teacher behaviors are accepted. In short, the respondents, regardless of age, all agree that
instructors/professors manifest their teaching behavior along the aversive teacher behavior.
The extent by which instructors/professors manifest their teaching behavior along the
aversive teacher behavior as to gender. Both means obtained fall within the “manifest
moderately” description. However, the mean obtained for the females which is 2.88 is
slightly higher than the mean of 2.80 obtained the male students.
The summary of ANOVA as to gender is the F-ratio of 3.4308 is least than the F-tabled value
of 3.88, therefore the null hypothesis which states that there are no significant differences
on the extent by which the instructors/professors manifest their teaching behavior along
the aversive teacher behavior as to gender, is accepted. In short, gender does not affect the
perception of the respondents on the extent by which the instructors/professors manifest
their teaching behavior along the aversive teacher behavior.
The extent by which Instructors/Professors Manifest their Teaching Behavior along the
Aversive Teacher Behavior as to College Affiliation, College of Arts and Sciences garnered a
higher mean of 3.40 than the other Colleges with a description of manifest moderately.
Second in rank is the College of Teacher Education has a mean of 3.12 with a description of
manifest moderately. Rank third is the College of Entrepreneurial Arts garnered a mean of
2.96, interpreted as manifest moderately.
The College of Engineering and Technology have a mean of 2.80 – manifest moderately;
College of Agriculture and Forestry have a mean of 2.88, interpreted as manifest
moderately. Lastly, High School department with a mean of 2.54, interpreted as manifest
less.
The summary of ANOVA as to College Affiliation is yielded a ratio of 2.3826, which is lower
than the F-tabled value of 2.34 at .05 level of significance. This led the researcher to the
acceptance of the null hypothesis that there are no significant differences in the perceptions
of the respondents on the extent by which the instructors/professors manifest their
teaching behavior along the aversive teacher behavior as to College Affiliation.
The extent by which the Instructors/Professors Manifest their Teaching Behavior along
Knowledge of the subject matters. (N=547)
Vol. 5 | No. 1 | January 2016
www.garph.co.uk
IJARMSS | 323
International Journal of Advanced Research in
Management and Social Sciences
Knowledge of the Subject Matter MVM(5)
1. The faculty answer questions in 100(500)
an expert and knowledgeable
manner
2. The faculty explain the subject 55(275)
matter clearly
3. The faculty cite current or up- 115(575)
date information on the subject
matter
4. The faculty read explanation 80(400)
from the books
5. The faculty talk fluently and 75(375)
smoothly on the subject matter
6. The faculty talk about things 100(500)
which are clearly not related to the
subject matter
7. The faculty speak clearly
100(500)
ISSN: 2278-6236
Impact Factor: 5.313
MM(4) MoM(3) ML(2)
NM(1) Mean
110(440) 123(369) 94(188) 120(120) 2.95
Description
Manifest
Moderately
108(432) 190(570) 104(208) 90(90)
Manifest
Moderately
Manifest
Moderately
2.87
88(352) 120(360) 109(218) 115(115) 2.96
99(346) 200(600) 58(116) 110(110) 2.97
115(460) 200(600) 57(114) 100(100) 3.01
90(360) 190(570) 67(134) 100(100) 3.02
100(400) 200(600) 61(122) 86(86)
Total Average Weighted Mean
3.12
2.98
Manifest
Moderately
Manifest
Moderately
Manifest
Moderately
Manifest
Moderately
Manifest
Moderately
The instructors/professors talk about things which are clearly not related to the subject
matters obtained a mean of 3.02, interpreted as manifest moderately; the
instructors/professors talk fluently and smoothly on the subject matter obtained a mean of
3.01, interpreted as manifest moderately; the instructors/professors read explanation from
the books obtained a mean of 2.97 – manifest moderately.
The instructors/professors cite current or up-to-date information on the subject matters
obtained a mean of 2.96, or interpreted as manifest moderately, the instructors/professors
answer questions in an expert and knowledgeable manner obtained a mean of 2.95, or
interpreted as manifest moderately.
The extent by which the Instructors/Professors manifest their Teaching Behavior along the
Knowledgeable of the subject matters as to age. The respondents who belong to age
brackets to 26 and above and 21 to 25 years obtained higher mean than those belong to 16
to 20 as shown by the mean of 3.06, 2.98 and 2.90 respectively. Although means fall under
similar “manifest moderately” description.
The summary of the ANOVA as to age the F-ratio of 2.0292 is far below the F-tabular value
of 3.16 at .05 level of significance. This respondents as to the variable of age. The null
hypothesis then which states that there are no significant differences in the perceptions of
the respondents on the extent by which the instructors/professors manifest their teaching
Vol. 5 | No. 1 | January 2016
www.garph.co.uk
IJARMSS | 324
International Journal of Advanced Research in
Management and Social Sciences
ISSN: 2278-6236
Impact Factor: 5.313
behavior along the knowledge of the subject matter is accepted. In short, the
instructors/professors manifest their teaching behavior along the aversive teacher behavior.
The extent by which Instructors/Professors Manifests their Teaching Behavior along the
Knowledge of the subject matter as to gender both means obtained fall within “manifest
moderately” category. However, the mean obtained for the females which is 3.02 is slightly
higher than the mean of 2.94 obtained by the male students.
The summary of ANOVA on the extent by which the instructors/professors manifest the
teaching behavior along the knowledge of the subject matter as to gender is the F-ratio of
3.1720 is less than the F-tabled value of 3.88, therefore the null hypothesis which states that
there are no significant differences on the extent by which the instructors/professors
manifest their teaching behavior along the knowledge of the subject matters as to gender, is
accepted. In short, gender does not influence the perception of the respondents on the
extent by which the instructors/professors manifest their teaching behavior along the
knowledge of the subject matter.
The extent by which Instructors/Professors Manifest their Teaching Behavior along the
knowledge of the subject matter as to College Affiliation, College of Teacher Education
obtained a higher mean of 3.38 than the other Colleges with a description of manifest
moderately. Second in rank is the College of Entrepreneurial Arts and Sciences with a mean
of 3.02, interpreted as manifest moderately. The College of Engineering and Technology
gave a mean of 3.08 – “manifest moderately”; College of Agriculture and Forestry have a
mean 3.10, interpreted as manifest moderately. Lastly, High School Department has a mean
of 2.78, interpreted as manifest moderately.
The summary of ANOVA on the extent by which instructors/professors manifest their
teaching behavior along the knowledge of the subject matters as to College Affiliation, the
computed yielded a ratio of 2.6401, which is lower than the F-tabled value of 4.34 at .05
level of significance. This led the researcher to the acceptance of the null hypothesis that
there are no significant differences in the perceptions of the respondents on the extent by
which the instructors/professors manifest their teaching behavior along the knowledge of
the subject matter as to College Affiliation.
The extent by which the Instructors/Professors Manifest their Teaching Behavior along
Knowledge of the Personal Teacher Characteristics.
Vol. 5 | No. 1 | January 2016
www.garph.co.uk
IJARMSS | 325
ISSN: 2278-6236
International Journal of Advanced Research in
Management and Social Sciences
Personal Teacher Behavior
1. The faculty adapted,
effectively to changes in
classroom situations as
demanded
by
the
occasions
2. The faculty displays
behavior such as vigorous
and appropriate gestures
from voice, etc., which
indicated enthusiasm and
interest in the subject
matter
3. The faculty carries
himself/herself
well,
showing self-confidence
4. The faculty maintains
eye contact with students
when speaking
5. The faculty carries out
promises to students by
keeping individual or group
appointments
6. The faculty show
recognition of the students
be greeting, etc., when
he/she meets them outside
of the class
7. The faculty makes
himself or herself available
to
students
for
consultation or assistance.
Total Average Weighted
Mean
Impact Factor: 5.313
MVM(5)
80(400)
MM(4)
97(388)
MoM(3)
200(600)
ML(2)
55(110)
NM(1)
115(115)
Mean
2.94
Description
Manifest
Moderately
75(375)
111(444)
190(570)
81(162)
90(90)
3.0
Manifest
Moderately
100(500)
110(440)
151(453)
97(194)
89(89)
3.06
Manifest
Moderately
80(400)
115(460)
195(585)
62(124)
95(95)
3.04
Manifest
Moderately
95(475)
90(360)
180(540)
91(182)
91(91)
2.99
Manifest
Moderately
80(400)
108(432)
200(600)
69(138)
90(90)
3.03
Manifest
Moderately
100(500)
110(440)
90(270)
87(174)
160(160)
2.82
Manifest
Moderately
2.98
Manifest
Moderately
It implies that instructors/professors of Kalinga-Apayao State College seldom have met their
students for a consultation. However, these instructors/professors who do not have time for
consultation with his students have a full teaching load in the classroom.
The instructors/professors maintain eye contact with students when speaking, obtained a
mean of 3.04, interpreted as manifests moderately; the instructors/professors show
recognition of the students by greeting, etc., when he/she meets them outside of the class
obtained a mean of 3.03 or manifest moderately. The instructors/professors display
behavior such as vigorous and appropriate gestures from voice, etc. which indicate
enthusiasm and interest in the subject matters obtained a mean of 3.0 or manifest
moderately.
Vol. 5 | No. 1 | January 2016
www.garph.co.uk
IJARMSS | 326
International Journal of Advanced Research in
Management and Social Sciences
ISSN: 2278-6236
Impact Factor: 5.313
The instructors/professors adapt effectively to changes in classroom situations as demanded
by the occasion obtained a mean of 2.94, interpreted as manifest moderately; the
instructors/professors carry out promises to students by keeping individual or group
appointments obtained a mean of 2.99 or manifest moderately.
The extent by which the Instructors/Professors manifest their teaching behavior along the
personal teacher characteristics as to age, the respondents who belong to age brackets of
26 and above and 21 to 25 years perceived higher than those belong to 16 to 20 as shown
by the means of 3.06, 2.98 and 2.90 respectively. Although all the means fall under similar
as “manifest moderately” description.
The summary of ANOVA on the extent by which the instructors/professors manifest their
teaching behavior along the personal teacher characteristics as to age is there is no
significant differences in the perceptions of the respondents the null hypothesis then which
states that there are no significant differences in the perceptions of the respondents on the
extent by which the instructors/professors manifest their teaching behavior along the
personal teacher characteristics is accepted. In short, the respondents, regardless of age, all
agree that instructors/professors manifest their teaching behavior along the personal
teacher behavior.
The extent by which Instructors/Professors manifest their teaching behavior along the
personal teacher characteristics as to gender both means obtained fall within the “manifest
moderately” description. However, the mean obtained for the females which is 3.06 is
slightly higher than the mean of 2.90 obtained the male students.
The summary of ANOVA on the extent by which the instructors/professors manifests the
teaching behavior along the personal teacher characteristics as to gender, the F-ratio of
1.6466 is less than the F-tabled value of 3.88, therefore the null hypothesis which states that
there are no significant differences on the extent by which the instructors/professors
manifest their teaching behavior along the personal teacher characteristics as to gender, is
accepted. In short, gender does not influence the perception of the respondents on the
extent by which the instructors/professors manifest their teaching behavior along the
personal teacher characteristics.
The extent by which instructors/professors manifest their teaching behavior along the
personal teacher characteristics as to College Affiliation. The College of Arts and Sciences
Vol. 5 | No. 1 | January 2016
www.garph.co.uk
IJARMSS | 327
ISSN: 2278-6236
International Journal of Advanced Research in
Management and Social Sciences
Impact Factor: 5.313
obtained a higher mean of 3.50 than the other Institutes with a description of manifest
moderately. Second in rank is the College is the College of Entrepreneurial Arts with a mean
of 3.38 with description of manifest moderately. Rank third is the College of Teacher
Education with a mean of 3.26, interpreted as manifest moderately.
The College of Engineering and Technology gave a mean of 3.0 or manifest moderately;
College of Agriculture and Forestry have a mean 2.95, or interpreted as manifest
moderately. Lastly, High School department have a mean 2.76, interpreted as manifest
moderately.
The summary of ANOVA as to College Affiliation the computation yielded a ratio of 2.4074,
which is lower than the F-tabled value of 3.34at .05 level of significance. This led the
researcher to the acceptance of the null hypothesis which states that there are no
significant differences in the perceptions of the respondents on the extent by which the
instructors/professors manifest their teaching behavior along the personal teacher
characteristics as to College Affiliation.
The extent by which the Instructors/Professors Manifests their Teaching Behavior along the
Motivational Teacher. (N=547)
Motivational
Teacher
Behavior
1. The faculty give
students
challenging
learning task, problems or
assignments
2. The faculty provide
review of the subject
matter if test results show
poor learning by the
students
3. The faculty inform
students of the results of
written
test
and
assignments
4. The faculty promptly
inform students of the
results of written test and
assignment
5. The faculty clearly
explain his/her grading
system
6. The faculty point out
how to earn credits
acceptable
academic
performance
7. The faculty praise or
MVM(5)
MM(4)
MoM(3)
ML(2)
NM(1)
Mean
Description
90(450)
113(452)
180(540)
71(142)
93(93)
3.03
Manifest
Moderately
80(400)
75(300)
220(660)
72(144)
100(100)
2.93
Manifest
Moderately
95(475)
121(440)
180(540)
36(72)
115(115)
3.06
Manifest
Moderately
75(375)
111(444)
200(600)
102(204)
59(59)
3.04
Manifest
Moderately
100(500)
118(472)
150(450)
89(178)
90(90)
3.05
Manifest
Moderately
112(560)
90(360)
115(345)
115(230)
115(115)
2.99
Manifest
Moderately
100(500)
90(360)
200(600)
62(124)
105(105)
3.08
Manifest
Vol. 5 | No. 1 | January 2016
www.garph.co.uk
IJARMSS | 328
ISSN: 2278-6236
International Journal of Advanced Research in
Management and Social Sciences
give approval to desired
academic behavior such
as doing assignments
participating in class
discussions, etc.
8. The faculty not answer
questions in an expert
and
knowledgeable
manner
9. The faculty do not
explain the subject matter
clearly
Total Average Weighted
Mean
Impact Factor: 5.313
Moderately
90(450)
111(444)
190(570)
71(142)
85(85)
3.0
Manifest
Moderately
100(500)
103(412)
111(333)
133(266)
100(100)
2.94
Manifest
Moderately
3.01
Manifest
Moderately
The respondents claimed that the personal teacher characteristics obtained a total average
weighted mean of 3.01 which is interpreted as manifest moderately.
The instructors/professors praise or give approval to desire academic behavior such as doing
assignments participating in class discussions, etc., obtained the highest mean of 3.08 or
interpreted as manifest moderately. It implies that the teachers of Kalinga-Apayao State
College recognized their students when they participate in discussion and they act as role
model in the school most especially in the classroom.
The instructors/professors provide review of the subject matter if test results show poor
learning by the students obtained the lowest mean of 2.93, or interpreted as manifest
moderately. It implies that the instructors/professors of Kalinga-Apayao State College never
review
the
topics
when
their
students
got
poor
performance.
However,
instructors/professors make another set of test for re-examination, in this case, students are
force to study and understand the topics.
The instructors/professors inform students of the results of written test and assignments
obtained a mean of 3.06, or interpreted as manifest moderately; the instructors/professors
clearly explain the grading system obtained a mean of 3.05 or manifest moderately; the
instructors/professors promptly inform students of the results of written test and
assignments obtained a mean of 3.04 or manifest moderately.
The instructors/professors do not explain the subject matter clearly obtained a mean of
2.94, or interpreted as manifest moderately, the instructors/professors point out how to
earn credits acceptable academic performance obtained a mean of 2.99 or manifest
Vol. 5 | No. 1 | January 2016
www.garph.co.uk
IJARMSS | 329
International Journal of Advanced Research in
Management and Social Sciences
ISSN: 2278-6236
Impact Factor: 5.313
moderately; the instructors/professors do not answer questions in an expert and
knowledgeable manner obtained a mean of 3.0 or manifest moderately.
The extent by which the Instructors/Professors manifest their teaching behavior along the
motivational teacher behavior as to age, the respondents who belong to age brackets of 26
and above and 21 to 25 years perceived higher than those belong to 16 to 20 as shown by
the mean of 3.11, 3.01, and 2.91 respectively. Although all the means fall under similar
description of “manifest moderately”.
The summary of ANOVA on the extent by which the instructors/professors manifest their
teaching behavior along the motivational teacher behavior as to age, the F-ratio of 2.5358 is
far below the F-tabular value of 3.01 at .05 level of significance. This indicates no significant
differences in the perceptions of the respondents as to variable of age. The null hypothesis
which states that there are no significant differences in the perceptions of the respondents
on the extent by which the instructors/professors manifest their teaching behavior along
the motivational teacher behavior is accepted. In short, the respondents, regardless of age,
all agree that instructors/professors manifest their teaching behavior along the motivational
teacher behavior.
The extent by which Instructors/Professors manifests their teaching behavior along the
motivational teacher behavior as to gender, both means obtained fall within the “manifest
moderately” description. However, the mean obtained by the females of is 3.06 is slightly
higher than the mean of 2.96 obtained the male students.
The summary of ANOVA as to gender is the F-ratio of F-ratio of 3.1820 is less than the Ftabled value of 3.63, therefore the null hypothesis which states that there are no significant
differences on the extent by which the instructors/professors manifest their teaching
behavior along the motivational teacher behavior as to gender, is accepted. In short, gender
does not influence the perception of the respondents on the extent by which the
instructors/professors manifest their teaching behavior along the motivational teacher
behavior.
The extent by which Instructors/Professors manifest their teaching behavior along the
motivational teacher behavior as to College Affiliation. The College of Arts and Sciences
obtained a higher mean of 3.59 than the other College with a description of manifest
moderately. Second in rank is the College of Entrepreneurial Arts with a mean of 3.39 with a
Vol. 5 | No. 1 | January 2016
www.garph.co.uk
IJARMSS | 330
International Journal of Advanced Research in
Management and Social Sciences
ISSN: 2278-6236
Impact Factor: 5.313
description of manifest moderately. Rank third is the College of Agriculture and Forestry
with a mean of 3.26, or interpreted as manifest moderately. The College of Engineering and
Technology have mean of 3.16 or manifest moderately; College of Teacher Education have a
mean of 3.00, or interpreted as manifest moderately. Lastly, High School Department has a
mean of 2.84, interpreted as manifest moderately.
The summary of ANOVA as to College Affiliation, the computed yielded a ratio of 0.1932,
which is lower than the F-tabled value of 2.55 at .05 level of significance. This led the
researcher to the acceptance of the null hypothesis that there are no significant differences
in the perceptions of the respondents on the extent by which the instructors/professors
manifest their teaching behavior along the motivational teacher behavior as to college
affiliation.
CONCLUSIONS
Based from the findings the following conclusions were formulated:
1. The instructors/professors manifest their teaching behavior moderately along the
principles and methods of teaching.
1.1. There are no significant differences on the extent of teaching behavior of the
instructors/professors along the principles and methods of teaching when
grouped as to age, gender and college affiliation.
2. The instructors/professors manifest their teaching behavior moderately along the
aversive teacher behavior.
2.1. There are no significant differences on the extent of teaching behavior of the
instructors/professors along the aversive teacher behavior according to the
moderator variables of age, gender and college affiliation.
3. The instructors/professors manifest their teaching behavior moderately along the
knowledge of the subject matter.
3.1. There are no significant differences on the extent of teaching behavior of the
instructors/professors along the knowledge of the subject matter when grouped
as to moderator variables.
4. The instructors/professors manifest their teaching behavior moderately along the
personal teacher.
Vol. 5 | No. 1 | January 2016
www.garph.co.uk
IJARMSS | 331
International Journal of Advanced Research in
Management and Social Sciences
ISSN: 2278-6236
Impact Factor: 5.313
4.1. There are no significant differences on the extent of teaching behavior of the
instructors/professors along the personal teacher characteristics when grouped
as to moderator variables.
5. The instructors/professors manifest their teaching behavior moderately along the
motivational teacher behavior.
5.1. There are no significant differences on the extent of teaching behavior of the
instructors/professors along the motivational teacher behavior when grouped as
to moderator variables.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Based from the findings and conclusions, the following recommendations are offered.
1. The instructors/professors should strive to relate new lessons to the previous lessons.
1.1. Instructors/professors should use different appropriate teaching techniques in
order to motivate the interest of the students.
1.2. Instructors/professors should make follow-up measures to determine if students
understood the lessons.
2. Instructors/professors should refrain from giving destructive criticisms to students
giving wrong answers.
3. Instructors/professors should be readily available for student consultations.
4. Instructors/professors should provide class review for students who got poor rating
during the examinations.
5. Instructors/professors should strive remedial classes to the performance of slow
learners.
REFERENCES
1. Aquino, Gaudencio B. Et.al., Principles of Teaching and Educational Technology,
(Manila: National Bookstore, 2012)
2. Bustus, Alicia S. & Espiritu, Soccoro E. Psychological, Anthropological and Sociological
Foundation. (Quezon City: KATHA Publishing Co. Inc. 2010)
3. Dagoon, Jean C. &Dagoon, Nellie Joy, Fundamental of Good Teaching: Teaching
Strategies in Livelihood & Vocational Education Today, (Manila: Rex Bookstore, 2010)
4. Daleon, Sixto O. Et. al., Fundamental of Statistics. (Manila: National Bookstore, Inc.)
Vol. 5 | No. 1 | January 2016
www.garph.co.uk
IJARMSS | 332
International Journal of Advanced Research in
Management and Social Sciences
ISSN: 2278-6236
Impact Factor: 5.313
5. Gregorio, Herman C. School Administration and Supervision,( R.P. Garcia Publishing
Co., Quezon City)
6. Rudyard, Bent .Et. al., Principles of Secondary Education, 6th edition (New York:
McGraw Hill)
7. Afable, Luz A. “The Classroom Teacher & Mental Health,” The Modern Teacher,
Volume XXXV, No. 8, January 2010)
8. Siscar, Hernando B., “The Business of Teaching “ The Modern Teacher (Volume XXXVI
No. 8. December 2011)
9. Stenson, James, “Teacher Development; Teacher as Manager”, Speech Delivered at
the Regional Conference of Education, Santiago Hall, PCI Bank Tower 1, Metro
Manila, September 2012.
10. Battung, Cristina &Nadal, Leizel, “Teachers and students Perceptions of the Factors
that Affect Effective Teaching at Cagayan State university” (Unpublished master’s
thesis, Cagayan Colleges of Tuguegarao, Cagayan, 1997)
11. Tang, Kendal, “The Teacher Behavior Inventory”, De La Salle University.
12. www.worldbook.Encyclopedia.com
13. www.behavior.com
14. www.teacherbehavior.com
Vol. 5 | No. 1 | January 2016
www.garph.co.uk
IJARMSS | 333