SURFACE ACOUSTIC WAVE STREAMING IN
A MICROFLUIDIC SYSTEM
Mansuor Mohamed Alghane
A dissertation submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy
Heriot-Watt University
School of Engineering and Physical Sciences
April 2013
This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is
understood to recognise that the copyright rests with its author and that no quotation
from the thesis and no information derived from it may be published without the prior
written consent of the author or of the University (as may be appropriate).
Abstract
This study focuses on the investigation of interaction mechanism between surface
acoustic wave (SAW) and micro-droplets of volumes (1-30µl) by means of experiments
and numerical simulations, and reports the achievements on three-dimensional acoustic
streaming and mixing dynamics.
Quantitative evidence was provided for the existence of strong nonlinear nature of flow
inertia in this SAW-driven flow when the strength of the acoustic force is larger than
0.01 time of surface tension. A new parameter
⁄
was defined to characterise
this nature, where F is the acoustic body force, λ the SAW wavelength, σ the surface
tension, and Rd the droplet radius. In contrast to the widely used Stokes model of
acoustic streaming which generally ignores such a nonlinearity, it was identified that the
full Navier-Stokes equation must be applied when FNA > 0.01 to avoid errors up to 93 %
between the computed streaming velocities and those from experiments as in the
nonlinear case. It is suggested that the Stokes model is valid when < 0.002. For an
FNA ranges between 0.002 and 0.01, the errors were found to be 5% and 20%,
respectively. Furthermore, it was demonstrated that the increase of > 0.45 induces
not only strong nonlinear internal streaming, but also the deformation of droplets.
Effect of SAW excitation frequency on streaming and mixing in the droplets is also
investigated in this study. It has been shown that SAW excitation frequency influences
the SAW attenuation length, lSAW, and hence the acoustic energy to be absorbed by the
droplet. It has been observed that the ratio of droplet radius to SAW attenuation length
(Rd /lSAW) plays an important role on SAW streaming. When Rd / lSAW ≤ 1, fast and
efficient mixing process can be achieved, even at the lowest RF power of 0.05 mW
supplied. However, when Rd /lSAW exceeds a critical value of 1, weaker acoustic
streaming was observed, which leads to a less effective acoustic mixing.
An investigation on the scaling effects in the flow hydrodynamic by SAWs in confined
microdroplets between a LiNbO3 substrate and a top glass plate showed that, the ratio of
the gap height to SAW attenuation length, (H /lSAW), is an important parameter affecting
the streaming flow induced in this confined microdroplet. At a given SAW power and
frequency, the results showed that, an increase in H /lSAW results in an increase of
streaming velocity; however, if H /lSAW exceeds 0.7, the streaming velocity decreases.
ii
Dedication
IN THE NAME OF ALLAH, THE ENTIRELY MERCIFUL, THE
ESPECIALLY MERCIFUL
My Lord, enable me to be grateful for your favour which you have bestowed
upon me and to do righteousness of which you approve
To my wonderful parents
`É{tÅxw TÄz{tÇx? ftÄ|Åt \uÜt{|Å
And lovely wife
at}tà UxÜÜtá TÄ|
iii
Acknowledgements
I have been very fortunate to receive a great deal of support throughout the course of my
research and I wish to express my gratitude for the help given by of my two supervisors,
Dr. Richard Fu and Dr. Baixin Chen, I would like to take this opportunity to thank them
for their kindness, advice, support, encouragement and friendship in the past exciting and
fruitful four years. I would like to thank my lovely mom, Salima Ibrahim for her great
support and encouragement during my research work.
I acknowledge support from the Innovative electronic Manufacturing Research Centre
(IeMRC) through the EPSRC funded flagship project SMART MICROSYSTEMS
(FS/01/02/10). Financial support from the Royal Society-Research Grant (RG090609),
Carnegie Trust Funding, Royal Society of Edinburgh, and China-Scotland Higher
Education Partnership, Royal Academy of Engineering-Research Exchanges with China
and India Awards is also acknowledged.
Finally, I would like thank Dr. Y. Li for his kind help and support during my project;
also I would like to express my deep appreciations to both Prof. A. J. Walton and Prof.
M. P. Y. Desmulliez for their valuable suggestions and recommendations during my
period of research.
iv
ACADEMIC REGISTRY
Research Thesis Submission
Name:
Mansuor Mohamed Alghane
School/PGI:
School of Engineering and Physical Sciences
Version: (i.e.
First,
Resubmission,
Final)
Final
Degree Sought
(Award and
Subject area)
PhD Mechanical Engineering
Declaration
In accordance with the appropriate regulations I hereby submit my thesis and I declare that:
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
*
the thesis embodies the results of my own work and has been composed by myself
where appropriate, I have made acknowledgement of the work of others and have made
reference to work carried out in collaboration with other persons
the thesis is the correct version of the thesis for submission and is the same version as
any electronic versions submitted*.
my thesis for the award referred to, deposited in the Heriot-Watt University Library, should
be made available for loan or photocopying and be available via the Institutional
Repository, subject to such conditions as the Librarian may require
I understand that as a student of the University I am required to abide by the Regulations
of the University and to conform to its discipline.
Please note that it is the responsibility of the candidate to ensure that the correct version
of the thesis is submitted.
Signature of
Candidate:
Date:
Submission
Submitted By (name in capitals):
MANSUOR MOHAMED ALGHANE
Signature of Individual Submitting:
Date Submitted:
/ 4 / 2013
For Completion in the Student Service Centre (SSC)
Received in the SSC by (name in capitals):
Method of Submission (handed in to SSC;
Posted through internal/external mail):
E-thesis Submitted (mandatory for final
theses)
Signature:
Date:
v
/ 4 / 2013
Nomenclature and Abbreviations
a
̀
The normal componet of the particle displacement amplitude of
m
the surface wave
The tangential componet of the particle displacement amplitude
m
of the surface wave
Amplitude of surface acoustic wave at the entrance point to the
m
liquid
Ac
Clustered starch area
m2
At
Droplet substrate contact area
m2
Width of the solid substrate
µm
Velocity of compressional waves in fluid
m/s
dV
Da
dx
Elastic coefficients or stiffness tensor
N/m2
Elastic constant
m3
Infinitesimal volume element
The diffusion coefficient
m2/s
Electric displacement
C/m2
Degree of arc
degree
Acoustic energy emitted by the Rayleigh wave into the adjacent
W
fluid
Dissipated acoustic energy by the viscous forces at the
W
adjacent fluid layer
Initial droplet diameter
m
Identified parameter of the centre axis of rotation in the x axes
m
direction
dy
Identified parameter of the centre axis of rotation in the y axes
m
direction
d
Interdigitated transducer finger’s spacing or width
m
Confined droplet diameter,
m
Electrical field strength
J/m
The energy transferred per second through the surface element by
W
the Rayleigh wave
The shear energy flow in the Rayleigh wave
Piezoelectric tensor
vi
W
Piezoelectric constant
C/m2
Excitation frequency of surface acoustic wave device
MHz
Fj
Steady force due Reynolds’ stress
N/m3
fL
Geometric focal length
!
m
N/m3
Streaming force
Normalized acoustic force
Tangential component of streaming force
N/m3
Normal component of streaming force
N/m3
Initial droplet height
m
!
Droplet height after acoustic wave application
m
H
Separation gap height
m
Critical gap height
m
"#
$%
&
&
&'
&
Electromechanical coupling coefficient
Wave number
1/m
Wave number of Rayleigh wave
1/m
Wave number of leaky surface acoustic wave
1/m
Real component of leaky wave number
1/m
&
Imaginary component of leaky wave number
m
Lx
Identified parameter of centre axis of rotation in the x axes
m
direction
Lz
()*
+
+,-
+,.-/
Identified parameter of centre axis of rotation in the z axes
m
direction
Damping length of the surface acoustic wave
m
Mass fraction of mixing species
Maximum initial mass fraction of dye species
Mean mass fraction
n
Indication to the wave propagation direction
N
Total number of computation cells
P
Periodicity of the interdigitated transducers
m
Pressure, where subscripts 0, 1, and 2 refer to the steady
Pa
0 , 02 , 0%
(ambient), first-order and second-order terms
PD
Radio frequency power applied to the SAW device
Pn
Normalized radio frequency power applied to the SAW device
PDr
Reference power frequency power applied to the SAW device
vii
W
W
3
Streaming pressure
Pa
r
Particle radius
m
Re
Reynolds number
45
Droplet radius
Rel
Reynolds number of linearized solution
Renl
Reynolds number of nonlinearzed solution
6
6
7
7
m
Mechanical strain
Symmetrical strain tensor, i, j =1, 2, 3
N/m2
Mechanical stress
Symmetrical stress tensor, i, j =1, 2, 3
8
Displacement component along the corresponding Cartesian
m
82
Longitudinal component of particle displacement of the Rayleigh
m
8:
8;2
8;:
??????
<= <>
<
8
axes 9
wave
Transverse component of particle displacement of the Rayleigh
m
wave
Displacement amplitude of the longitudinal component
m
Displacement amplitude of the transverse component
m
The mean value of the fluctuation fluid velocities product, i.e., <
and <
Streaming velocity
m2/s2
m/s
Longitudinal component of leaky SAW displacement
m
8
Transverse component of leaky SAW displacement
m
Ux
Streaming velocity in the x axes direction
m/s
Uxr
Reference streaming velocity in the x axes direction
m/s
Uxn
Normalized streaming velocity in the x axes direction
@
@
Propagation velocity of the Rayleigh wave
m/s
The tangential particle velocity at the surface-liquid interface
m/s
@'
Leaky surface acoustic wave velocity
Vi
Localized cell volume of droplet mesh
m3
Total droplet volume initially occupied by the dye species
m3
Droplet volume
m3
First-order or acoustic velocity
m/s
Second-order or streaming velocity
m/s
@
@ABA
v2
v%
viii
D)*
92 , 9% , 9:
9
E'
EF
E
G
H
I
I
J
K
L
LM
L , L2 , L%
N
NO
λ
PM
Ө
Q
R
R
S T
Width of the surface acoustic wave
Cartesian coordinates in the x, y and z axes respectively
Cartesian axes, where i =1, 2, 3
Absorption coefficient of the Rayleigh wave due to emission of
1/m
longitudinal waves
Absorption coefficient of the Rayleigh wave due to viscous
1/m
forces
Attenuation constant of leaky surface acoustic wave
Angular frequency of an applied electrical signal
The viscous penetration depth
Rad/sec
m
Permittivity tensor
Dielectric permittivity
Error parameter
Electric potential
J
Solid substrate density
kg/m3
Fluid density
kg/m3
Fluid density, where subscripts 0, 1, and 2 refer to the steady
kg/m3
(ambient), first order and second order terms
Fluid shear viscosity
N·s/m2
Fluid bulk viscosity
N·s/m2
Wavelength of the Rayleigh wave
m
Wavelenght of longitudinal waves in the fluid
m
SAW-droplet interaction angle
degree
Rayleigh angle
degree
Reynolds’ stress
N/m2
Surface tension
N/m
Time-averaging of fast harmonic oscillations of the Rayleigh
wave
2D
Two dimensional
3D
Three dimensional
µTAS
Micro total analysis system
CFD
Computational fluid dynamic
DI
m
Deionized water
ix
Exp.
Experimental
FE
Finite element
FVM
Finite volume method
FIDTs
Focused interdigitated transducers
FPW
Flexural plate wave
GPL
General public license
IDTs
Interdigitated transducers
LOC
Lab-on-Chip
LiNbO3
Lithium Niobate
LSAW
Leaky surface acoustic wave
MIP
Mixing index parameter
N-S
Navier-Stokes
Num.
RF
Numerical
Radio frequency
SAW
Surface acoustic wave
SSAW
standing surface acoustic wave
PDMS
Poly Dimethyl Siloxan
PDF
Probability distribution function
PZT
Piezoelectric zirconium titanate ceramic plate
VOF
Volume of fluid
x
Table of Contents
Abstract .......................................................................................................................... ii
Dedication .....................................................................................................................iii
Acknowledgements....................................................................................................... iv
Nomenclature and Abbreviations ................................................................................. vi
Table of Contents .......................................................................................................... xi
List of Publications ...................................................................................................... xv
List of Tables ............................................................................................................. xvii
List of Figures ...........................................................................................................xviii
Chapter 1 ......................................................................................................................... 1
INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1
1.1
General Introduction ......................................................................................... 1
1.2
Research Objectives .......................................................................................... 3
1.3
Thesis Outline ................................................................................................... 3
Chapter 2 ......................................................................................................................... 5
WAVE GENERATION AND PROPAGATION BACKGROUND ........................... 5
2.1
Introduction ....................................................................................................... 5
2.2
Bulk Waves in Elastic Solids ............................................................................ 6
2.2.1
Wave equation in a non-piezoelectric solid .................................................. 6
2.2.2
Wave equation in a piezoelectric solid.......................................................... 8
2.3
Rayleigh Surface Acoustic Wave.................................................................... 10
2.3.1
Introduction ................................................................................................. 10
2.3.2
Propagation characteristics of Rayleigh wave ............................................ 10
2.3.3
Rayleigh wave excitation ............................................................................ 12
2.4
2.4.1
Raleigh Wave with Liquid Loading ................................................................ 14
Attenuation by ambient media .................................................................... 14
2.5
Internal Streaming ........................................................................................... 18
2.6
Summary ......................................................................................................... 19
Chapter 3 ....................................................................................................................... 20
LITERATURE REVIEW............................................................................................. 20
3.1
Experimental Study of SAW-Based Microfluidics ......................................... 20
3.1.1
SAW for acoustic mixing ............................................................................ 20
3.1.2
SAW for particles concentration ................................................................. 25
3.1.3
SAW for particle focusing and sorting........................................................ 26
xi
3.1.4
SAW for fluid pumping .............................................................................. 28
3.1.5
SAW for fluid jetting and atomization ........................................................ 33
3.2
Numerical Analysis of SAW-Liquid Interaction ............................................ 37
3.2.1
Streaming phenomena ................................................................................. 37
3.2.2
Droplet deformation .................................................................................... 41
3.3
Software for SAW Steaming Simulation ........................................................ 43
3.3.1
Commercial codes ....................................................................................... 43
3.3.2
Free codes.................................................................................................... 44
3.3.3
Software selection ....................................................................................... 45
3.4
Summary ......................................................................................................... 46
Chapter 4 ....................................................................................................................... 48
STREAMING PHENOMENON.................................................................................. 48
4.1
Introduction ..................................................................................................... 48
4.2
Experimental Details ....................................................................................... 50
4.2.1
Experimental apparatus and signal measurement ....................................... 50
4.2.2
Streaming velocity measurement ................................................................ 52
4.3
4.3.1
4.4
Modeling Details ............................................................................................. 55
Governing equations ................................................................................... 55
Results and Discussions .................................................................................. 61
4.4.1
Symmetric SAW streaming-mixing effect .................................................. 61
4.4.2
Concentration of particles using asymmetric SAW streaming ................... 65
4.5
Summary ......................................................................................................... 74
Chapter 5 ....................................................................................................................... 75
ACOUSTIC STREAMING AND HYDRODYNAMIC NONLINEARITY ............ 75
5.1
Introduction ..................................................................................................... 75
5.2
Methods ........................................................................................................... 76
5.2.1
Experimental ............................................................................................... 76
5.2.2
Modeling Details ......................................................................................... 76
5.3
Results and Discussions .................................................................................. 76
5.3.1
Dimensionless parameters........................................................................... 76
5.3.2
Influences of fluid inertia on streaming phenomena ................................... 77
5.3.3
Droplet Deformation ................................................................................... 83
5.4
Summary ......................................................................................................... 84
Chapter 6 ....................................................................................................................... 85
xii
INFLUENCES OF CONFIGURATION PARAMETERS ON STREAMING
PHENOMENON .......................................................................................................... 85
6.1
Introduction ..................................................................................................... 85
6.2
Experimental ................................................................................................... 85
6.3
Modeling Details ............................................................................................. 85
6.4
Results and Discussions .................................................................................. 86
6.4.1
Acoustic streaming vs. power ..................................................................... 86
6.4.2
Streaming vs. SAW aperture ....................................................................... 90
6.4.3
Streaming patterns vs. droplet volume ........................................................ 95
6.5
Summary ......................................................................................................... 98
Chapter 7 ....................................................................................................................... 99
FREQUENCY EEFECT ON MIXING PERFORMANCE ...................................... 99
OF A RAYLEIGH SAW .............................................................................................. 99
7.1
Introduction ..................................................................................................... 99
7.2
Numerical Analysis ....................................................................................... 100
7.2.1
Computational experiment setup............................................................... 100
7.2.2
Streaming model ....................................................................................... 100
7.2.3
Mixing model ............................................................................................ 100
7.2.4
Boundary conditions and solution............................................................. 101
7.2.5
Mixing index ............................................................................................. 102
7.3
Experimental ................................................................................................. 102
7.4
Comparison and Discussion .......................................................................... 103
7.4.1
Acoustic mixing process ........................................................................... 103
7.4.2
Mixing efficiency versus SAW excitation frequency ............................... 107
7.4.3
Acoustic streaming versus SAW wavelength ........................................... 116
7.5
Summary ....................................................................................................... 120
Chapter 8 ..................................................................................................................... 122
SCALLING EFFECTS IN SAW STREAMING...................................................... 122
8.1
Introduction ................................................................................................... 122
8.2
Experimental and Numerical Details ............................................................ 123
8.3
Results and Discussions ................................................................................ 125
8.3.1
Streaming velocity versus RF power and gap height ................................ 125
8.3.2
Physical mechanism .................................................................................. 129
8.4
Summary ....................................................................................................... 135
Chapter 9 ..................................................................................................................... 137
xiii
CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE WORK............................................................... 137
9.1
Conclusions ................................................................................................... 137
9.2
Future Work .................................................................................................. 138
References .............................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined.140
xiv
List of Publications
Journal papers:
1. Alghane, M., Chen, B. X., Fu, Y. Q., Li, Y., Luo, J. K and Walton, A. J.,
Experimental and numerical investigation of acoustic streaming excited by using
a surface acoustic wave device on a 128º YX-LiNbO3 substrate. J. Micromech.
Microeng., 2011. 21: p. 015005. DOI:10.1088/0960-1317/21/1/015005
2. Alghane, M., Fu, Y. Q., Chen, B. X., Li, Y., Desmulliez, M. P. Y., and Walton,
A. J., Streaming phenomena in microdroplets induced by Rayleigh surface
acoustic wave. J. Appl. Phys., 2011. 109: p. 114901. DOI:10.1063/1.3586040
3. Brodie, D.S., Fu, Y. Q., Li, Y., Alghane, M., Reuben, R. L. and Walton, A. J.
Shear horizontal surface acoustic wave induced microfluidic flow. Appl. Phys.
Lett., 2011. 99: p. 153704. DOI:10.1063/1.3651487
4. Li, Y., Fu, Y. Q., Brodie, D.S., Alghane, M. and Walton, A. J. Integrated microfluidics system using surface acoustic wave (SAW) and electrowetting on
dielectrics (EWOD) technology. Biomicrofluidics, 2012. 6: p. 012812.
DOI:10.1063/1.3660198
5. Alghane, M., Fu, Y. Q., Chen, B. X., Li, Y., Desmulliez, M. P. Y., and Walton,
A. J., Scaling effects on flow hydrodynamics of confined microdroplets induced
by Rayleigh surface acoustic wave. Microfluid. Nanofluid., 2012. 13: p.1-9.
DOI: 10.1007/s10404-012-1010-y
6. Alghane, M., Fu, Y. Q., Chen, B. X., Li, Y., Desmulliez, M. P. Y., and Walton,
A. J., Frequency effect on streaming phenomenon induced by Rayleigh surface
acoustic wave in microdroplets. J. Appl. Phys., 2012. 112: p. 084902-12. DOI:
10.1063/1.4758282
7. Alghane, M., Chen, B. X., Fu, Y. Q., Li, Y., Desmulliez, M. P. Y., Mohamed,
M. I and Walton, A. J., Nonlinear hydrodynamic effects induced by Rayleigh
surface acoustic wave in sessile droplets. Phys. Rev. E, 2012. 86(5): p. 056304.
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.86.056304
8. Alghane, M., Fu, Y. Q., Chen, B. X., Li, Y., Desmulliez, M. P. Y., and Walton,
A. J., A review of a Rayleigh wave based microfluidic. (To be submitted)
xv
Conference papers:
1. Aghane, M., Fu, Y. Q. et al, 2Annual Workshop on Institue of Intgrated Sysyems,
Feb, 2010, University of edinburgh, Eidniburgh, UK. (Poster)
2. Aghane, M., Fu, Y. Q.*, Chen, B. X., Desmulliez, M., Acoustic streaming behavior
excited by Rayleigh surface acoustic wave. 1st International conference on fluid
problems in process engineering, 6-8th September 2010, Leeds, UK. (Oral & Paper
presented)
3. Aghane, M., Fu, Y. Q. and Chen, B. X., Surface acoustic wave streaming in
microfluidic system. IMAPS-UK “Making MEMS Work”, 2010, Edinburgh, UK.
(Poster)
4. Aghane, M., Fu, Y. Q. and Chen, B.X., Finite volume analysis of acoustic wave
streaming using various interdigital transducers. 2nd International Conference on
Bio-Sensing Technology, 10-12th October 2011, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, P073.
(Poster)
5. Li, Y., Fu, Y. Q., Brodie, D.S., Alghane, M. and Walton, A. J., Enhanced microdroplet splitting, concentration, sensing and ejection by integrating ElectroWettingOn-Dielectrics and Surface Acoustic Wave technologies. in Solid-State Sensors,
Actuators
and
Microsystems
Conference
(TRANSDUCERS),
International. 05-019 Oral Presentation, June 5
th
2011
16th
th
to 9 , 2011, Beijing. (Paper
presented) DOI: 10.1109/TRANSDUCERS.2011.5969406
6. Y.Q. Fu, J. K. Luo, S. Brodie, A. Mansuor, Highly efficient digital microfluidics
and Biosensing devices based on ZnO thin films, in 2nd International Conference on
Biosensing Technology, Amsterdam, Netherlands, Oct 9th to 12th 2011. (Poster)
7. Fu, Y.Q., Alghane, M., Luo, J. K., Chen, B.X., Li, Y. and Walton A., Invited
paper: Lab-on-chip based on Surface Acoustic Wave devices of piezoelectric
ceramic LiNbO3, International Conference on Electroceramics 2011, 12-16th
December 2011, Sydney, Australia (Paper presented)
xvi
List of Tables
Table 2.1 Parameters of some typical piezoelectric substrates for SAW devices [40] ... 13
Table 4.1 Leaky SAW parameters calculated based on Campbell and Jones [46, 123] . 57
Table 7.1 Characteristic flow parameters for numerical simulation of 5.0 µl droplet at
RF power 0.5 mW. ........................................................................................................ 118
xvii
List of Figures
Figure 1.1 Example of biochip for Lab-on-chip [4].......................................................... 1
Figure 2.1 Illustration of mechanical energy transformation into an electrical energy
[40] .................................................................................................................................... 8
Figure 2.2 A sketch of Rayleigh wave showing its propagation in an elastic solids [43]
......................................................................................................................................... 10
Figure 2.3 Coordinate system for surface waves showing propagation direction, where
n indicates the wave propagation direction ..................................................................... 11
Figure 2.4 Characteristics of a Rayleigh wave in an isotropic half-space elastic solid
(e.g., piezoelectric substrate); (a) Displacement field of the wave particles; (b) Decay of
displacement amplitudes UV and UW as a function of solid depth [44] ........................ 12
Figure 2.5 Surface acoustic wave device [27]............................................................... 13
Figure 2.6 Schematic illustration of the IDTs on the substrate surface for; (a) parallel
IDTs of a conventional SAW device; (b) curved IDTs of focused SAW device, where
Da is the degree of arc and fL the geometric focal length [46] ........................................ 14
Figure 2.7 An illustration of (a) Rayleigh wave attenuation by radiating longitudinal
waves from the substrate into the adjacent liquid at an angle X of XY; (b) an element of
the solid surface showing the leakage of Rayleigh wave energy into the fluid [50]. ..... 16
Figure 2.8 Sketch of SAW stream acting on liquid droplet [58] .................................... 19
Figure 3.1 Snapshots of SAW-induced internal streaming in a 50 nl droplet, showing
the dissolving process of a dye spot deposited on a SAW device surface [16] .............. 21
Figure 3.2 Photo of a ~ 40 nl droplet on the surface of SAW device that was used during
a chemical reaction experiment [63] ............................................................................... 21
Figure 3.3 Top view series images of the mixing experiments of beads in a confined
water droplet taken about 105 s after applying the SAW power, using an 128º Y-cut
LiNbO3 piezoelectric substrate for different modulation frequencies; The SAW device
was operated at a constant power in (a), and (b)-(f) modulated at frequencies 0.042,
0.083, 0.17, 0.34, and 0.68 Hz, respectively [64] ........................................................... 22
Figure 3.4 Fluid streaming induced by an IDT fitted at the bottom of the cell, the solid
white arrows indicate to the source points, where the higher driving frequency is, the
smaller distance between the two sources [65] ............................................................... 22
Figure 3.5 (a) Schematic illustration of experimental setup; (b) Tracked trajectories of
fluorescence particles in a microfluidic well induced after SAW-fluid coupling [22] ... 23
xviii
Figure 3.6 Sketch and illustration of a microchannel used in the investigation of SAW
induced mixing; (a) Sketch showing the setup used during experiment; (b) Image
showing the distribution of the fluorescence bead at Y-junction; (c) Image of the
channel flow when the SAW was not operated; (d) Image of the channel flow with
SAW excited from underneath the channel [58] ............................................................. 23
Figure 3.7 Characteristics of SAW-induce mixing in a Y-type PDMS microchannel; (a)
Illustration showing the position of F-IDTs with the bonded microchannel; (b) No
mixing was induced without a SAW ; (c) Mixing observed after the SAW was excited;
(d) and (e) Normalized concentration of fluorescent particles measured along the width
of channel for no-SAW and SAW cases, respectively [67] ............................................ 24
Figure 3.8 Schematic illustration for breaking the symmetry of SAW propagation; (a) A
droplet positioned asymmetrically in the SAW propagation path; (b) Piezoelectric
substrate with a diagonal cut[68] .................................................................................... 25
Figure 3.9 Snapshots showing the concentration process in a 5µl liquid droplets, using
a SAW device of 128º YX-LiNbO3 substrate with straight fingers pattern of a 1200 µm
aperture and ~ 8.6 MHz signal frequency at an RF power of 330 mW; (a) Images
showing accumulation sequence of fluorescent particles at the droplet centre of 1µm in
diameter ; (b) of live yeast cells that quickly concentrated at the centre of the droplet, in
2 s [68] ............................................................................................................................ 26
Figure 3.10 Sequence images of blood cell concentration using a diluted blood sample
of a 10 µl droplet volume, based on 128º YX-LiNbO3 SAW device with a straight IDTs
aperture of 1 mm at power of 103 mW, with phononic crystal structures [72] .............. 26
Figure 3.11 (a) Schematic illustration of a SSAW device inducing particle focusing
with demonstration showing its working mechanism; (b) Focusing of polystyrene beads
in the centre of a PDMS microchannel, which was monitored at different position [73]
......................................................................................................................................... 27
Figure 3.12 The top sketch indicates the monitored sections (I-III) of particles
separation in a PDMS channel measuring 150 µm width and 80 µm height bonded on a
128º YX-LiNbO3 piezoelectric substrate; the bottom image shows the fluorescent
images at the sections (I-III), where the green colour indicates polystyrene beads of 4.17
µm in diameter and red colour indicates the 0.87 µm beads, where the beads were
separated in ~360 ms [75] ............................................................................................... 28
Figure 3.13 Deformation and pumping of a 50 nl water droplet on the surface of a
LiNbO3 SAW device. In pictures 2 and 5, the droplet is under an intensive pulsed SAW.
xix
In pictures 3 and 6 the droplet returns to its original shape after the SAW is turned off
[16] .................................................................................................................................. 29
Figure 3.14 Snapshots of a SAW-driven microfluidic process for three droplets of ~ 100
nl in volume each; (a) initial state; (b)-(d) a series of images presents the movement of
droplets and the occurrence of a chemical reaction (e.g., colour change) after the
droplets were merged [16] .............................................................................................. 29
Figure 3.15 Periodical distortion of a 2 µl water droplet; (a) Subsequence images taken
at time steps 0, 0.0028, 0.0056 and 0.0084 s, respectively using a high-speed camera;
(b) Evaluated changes in droplet height h0 and d0 [80].................................................. 30
Figure 3.16 Sliding velocity of water droplets as a function of applied voltage for a
LiNbO3 treated with Octadecyltrichlorosilane [17] ........................................................ 31
Figure 3.17 Sketch of a SAW-driven guided droplet system; (a) Side view; (b) Top
view[61] .......................................................................................................................... 31
Figure 3.18 Experimental configuration of SAW-induced pumping in a microchannel;
(a)-(b) demonstrating the placement of the PDMS channel on a LiNbO3 substrate, and a
2 µl water droplet; (d)-(e) Withdrawing of the droplet after applying the electric signal
[82] .................................................................................................................................. 32
Figure 3.19 (a) Top view image showing the whole microfluidic chip that contains multi
IDT’s; (b) Side view sketch showing the water droplet placed at the channel entrance
[84] .................................................................................................................................. 33
Figure 3.20 (a) Image of jet streams that formed during experiment by a SAW from the
water layer on a hydrophobic surface of a 128º YX-LiNbO3 piezoelectric substrate [85];
(b) Jet without surface treatment (hydrophilic), and (c) for a hydrophobically treated
surface, in which the water jet is more directional than that without treatment [87] ...... 34
Figure 3.21 Jetting phenomenon of a water droplet initiated by focused SAW, using
a
128º YX-LiNbO3 piezoelectric substrate; (a) Subsequent images showing the early
stages of the jet initiation for water droplet placed at the focal point of focused IDT’s;
(b) Images showing the process of jet breakup and droplets formation by increasing of
the applied power above a certain threshold value, which enables the acoustic and
inertial forces to overcome the interfacial forces of droplet surface tension[20] .......... 34
Figure 3.22 Schematic illustration of atomization principle; (a) Oscillation effect of a
Rayleigh wave motion on an adjacent fluid layer, which was vacillated accordingly; (b)
Atomization of adjacent liquid film by a strong destabilization of capillary wave,
showing the mist formation [88] ..................................................................................... 35
xx
Figure 3.23 (a) Schematic illustration of SAW atomizer; (b)-(c) Side view images using
a high speed camera showing a droplet translation, distortion, thin film formation and
atomization;(d) Side view of formulated polymer patterns using a 20 MHz excitation
frequency; (e)-(f) Sequent images from top view showing the depiction of a thin film
atomisation and polymer particles patterning. The needle in images was used to deliver
the polymer solution onto the substrate surface but was not touching it [90]................. 36
Figure 3.24 Comparison for streaming results between an experimental data (a) and
numerical simulations (b), based on 2D computations of water loaded a 128º YXLiNbO3 piezoelectric substrate at an excitation frequency of 100 MHz [94] ................. 39
Figure 3.25 SAW streaming patterns in different SAW positions (depicted by narrows):
(a) Centre, (b) Side and (c) Outer part. The upper pictures represent the particles
trajectory and the bottom pictures represent ray-tracing stream simulation [25] ........... 40
Figure 3.26 Numerical streaming patterns generated in water on a YZ-LiNbO3 SAW
device, at an excitation frequency of 100 MHz and an applied voltage of 10 V; The
calculated velocities are in µm/s [103] ........................................................................... 40
Figure 3.27 Numerical calculations of the droplet deformation and acoustic streaming
by a SAW; (a) streaming velocity and flow patterns; (b) FE computational grid [105]. 42
Figure 3.28 Finite element numerical results of SAW-induced streaming for the free
boundary domains (sessile droplets); (a) and (b) the droplet shape before and after the
SAW turned on in, respectively. [106]. .......................................................................... 42
Figure 4.1 Illustration of SAW propagation into droplet ................................................ 48
Figure 4.2 Water droplets on LiNbO3 (a) untreated surface (b) hydrophobic surface
treated with CYTOP. ....................................................................................................... 50
Figure 4.3 Photograph of the experimental apparatus used for of SAW induced
streaming experiments. ................................................................................................... 51
Figure 4.4 The reflection signal of a 128o YX- black LiNbO3 SAW device with IDTs
periodicity of 64 µm, measured using a network analyzer; the red arrow indicates to the
peak resonant frequency of the SAW device .................................................................. 51
Figure 4.5 Output reading of an MI TF2175 RF power amplifier measured using a
Racal 9104 RF power metre for a moderate range on input power and excitation
frequencies, using a 128o YX- black LiNbO3 SAW device. ........................................... 52
Figure 4.6 Photograph showing a high speed camera experimental setup of a streaming
velocity measurement...................................................................................................... 53
Figure 4.7 (a) and (b) schematic illustration of a water droplet with seeded particles on
the SAW device, showing the focal region of High Speed Camera from top and side
xxi
view respectively; (c) and (d) captured images of droplet from top and side views during
the experiment. ................................................................................................................ 54
Figure 4.8 An experimental snapshots using high speed camera showing the particle
trajectory. ........................................................................................................................ 55
Figure 4.9 (a) Illustration of a droplet positioned symmetrically on surface of a SAW
device; (b) asymmetric positioning of water droplet on the SAW device. ..................... 58
Figure 4.10 Computational curvilinear grid meshing of sessile droplet from side view 59
Figure 4.11 Streaming velocity at top centre of 30 µl droplet positioned symmetry
within a SAW propagation direction at f = 62 MHz (SAW device has an aperture of 2
mm); Solid lines represent numerical results at different RF powers; the markers denote
experimentally measured data. ........................................................................................ 60
Figure 4.12 Effect of driving RF power on the normalised SAW amplitude, A / λ at the
interaction point. From this study, a Numerical-Experimental correlation results were
presented, where a 30µl droplet positioned symmetry within SAW propagation on a
128º YX-LiNbO3 SAW device at 62 MHz. Along with the experimental measurements
of SAW amplitude available in the literature [1, 2] ........................................................ 61
Figure 4.13 Flow normalized streaming velocity as a function of normalised RF power
for a 30 µl droplet size using a 128º YX-LiNbO3 SAW device (IDT with 60 fingers). . 62
Figure 4.14 Numerical 3D illustration showing the droplet SAW interaction leading to
3D complex flow patterns due to SAW energy attenuation and Reynolds stresses
formation which in turn produces an effective steady force acting in the fluid body (30
µl droplet at an RF power of 15.89 mW); (a) tilted view, (b) direct view focusing
through droplet centre ..................................................................................................... 63
Figure 4.15 Numerical results showing the progress of flow field after applying the RF
power and SAW propagation (30 µl droplet at an RF power of 2.75 mW) .................... 63
Figure 4.16 SAW numerical streaming patterns for 30 µl droplet at different SAW
forces. The streaming velocity increases from zero (sky blue) to higher velocity (light
red); (a) RF power of 2.75 mW; (b) RF power of 46.56 mW. The white stars indicate
the circulation centres ..................................................................................................... 64
Figure 4.17 Comparison of experimental and numerical modeling for a 30 µl droplet
positioned at the centre with the SAW propagation direction; the upper row shows
pictures of particles trajectories; the bottom row shows the corresponding streaming
patterns from numerical simulations. The red arrow indicates the SAW propagation
direction........................................................................................................................... 65
xxii
Figure 4.18 Captured video images illustrating the rapid concentration process for a
30µl water droplet with starch particles at an RF power of 79.43 mW, frequency 62
MHz and SAW width 2 mm; the first row shows a side view of the droplet, while the
second row shows a top view of the starch being concentrated. The yellow arrow
indicates the SAW propagation direction ....................................................................... 66
Figure 4.19 (a) Illustration of numerical result of streaming velocities for a 30 µl droplet
at the RF power of 24.39 mW; the vectors indicate the flow circulation direction at the
droplet surface. (b) Side view snapshot of a corresponding experiment shows particles
trajectories after SAW application, as indicated by the black arrow .............................. 67
Figure 4.20 Streaming velocity distributions across the centre of a 30 µl droplet at the
RF power of 46.56 mW. These curves represent numerical results along with x-axis as
depicted by the red line through the droplet centre for different heights from the
substrate surface (droplet-surface contact area) .............................................................. 67
Figure 4.21 Experimental and numerical illustrations of a secondary recirculation for a
10 µl water droplet ; (a) the captured video image during the concentration process of
starch particles at the RF power of 79.43 mW; (b) the corresponding numerical
streaming patterns focusing through the droplet volume; (c) streaming patterns
illustrates the column of secondary and the swirl motion; (d) a cross-sectional plan view
seen from the bottom of the droplet, which illustrates the swirling motion towards the
centre of rotation. ............................................................................................................ 69
Figure 4.22 Radial streaming velocity components from numerical results at different
heights from the droplet bottom for a 30 µl droplet at an RF power of 79.43 mW. ....... 69
Figure 4.23 Effect of RF power and droplet size on the particle concentration time (time
for particle accumulation to change from its initial to the final steady state for moderate
range of droplet size)....................................................................................................... 71
Figure 4.24 Radial streaming velocities from numerical results at 200 µm height from
the droplet bottom for 30 µl droplet at different RF powers ........................................... 71
Figure 4.25 Experimental time-RF power concentration curve for a 30 µl droplet size in
asymmetric position with a SAW device at 62 MHz. ..................................................... 73
Figure 4.26 The area concentration ratio A c/ At
(the ratio between the concentrated
starch area Ac and the whole droplet area At viewed from top) as a function of the
droplet size and RF power............................................................................................... 73
Figure 5.1 Effects of hydrodynamic nonlinearity in the relationship between the steady
state Reynolds numbers, Re and FNA, using 128º YX-LiNbO3 SAW device with 0.5 mm
aperture excited by a frequency of 60.4 MHz; (a) results for 1 and 10 µl droplets; and
xxiii
(b) results for 2.5 and 5 µl droplets. Solid and broken lines represent the nonlinear and
linear numerical results, respectively. The markers denote the experimental data ......... 78
Figure 5.2 Hydrodynamic nonlinearity effects on; (a) the transient streaming velocity of
a 30 µl droplet measured at point B, using 128º YX-LiNbO3 SAW device with 62 MHz
frequency, 2 mm aperture at different Z[\; (b) the streaming velocity as a function of
Z[\ for a 10 µl droplet using a 0.5 mm aperture SAW device driven at 60.4 MHz.
Solid and broken lines represent the nonlinear and linear numerical results, respectively.
The markers are the experimental measurements ........................................................... 80
Figure 5.3 Simulated streaming velocity profiles for a 20 µl droplet, using SAW device
with 2.5 mm aperture, 62 MHz frequency and Z[\ of 0.366; (a) along the y axis ;(b)
along the z axis at a 1,200 µm height from the droplet bottom. Solid and broken lines
represent the nonlinear and linear cases, respectively .................................................... 82
Figure 5.4 Simulated streaming patterns for 20 µl droplet, using SAW device with 2.5
mm aperture, 62 MHz frequency and Z[\ of 0.366. The upper and lower row
represents the nonlinear and linear cases, respectively. Broken lines represents axis of
rotation ............................................................................................................................ 83
Figure 5.5 Normalized droplet height as a function of the normalized driving force
(FNA), for different droplet volumes, using 128º YX-LiNbO3 SAW devices with 0.5 mm
aperture excited by a frequency of 60.4 MHz; dashed line stands for trendline............. 84
Figure 6.1 SAW streaming patterns for a 30 µl droplet from top (a) and (b), side (c) and
(d), front (e) and (f), and back view (g) and (h) using a 128º YX-LiNbO3 SAW device
(60 IDT fingers, 2 mm aperture and 50 mW RF power). The left column photos of 6 µm
polystyrene particles trajectories, while the right column represents the corresponding
simulated streaming patterns. The red arrow in the first row indicates to the SAW
propagation direction ...................................................................................................... 87
Figure 6.2 Numerical results showing the changes in the position of the axis of rotation
with the increase in the RF power for a 30 µl droplet using 2 mm wide IDT. The upper
row focuses on the droplet top surface, where the centre of the double vortex can be
easily seen; the lower row shows the side view focusing through the droplet centre
(middle position with the droplet volume), where the position of the axis of rotation at
the middle of the droplet volume is clearly indicated. The parameters Lx and Lz indicate
to the positions of the centre of double vortex, while dx and dy indicate the positions of
the central axis of rotation through the droplet centre .................................................... 88
xxiv
Figure 6.3 Numerical results representing the changes in the parameters of the central
axis of rotation with the RF power for a 30 µl droplet using 2 mm IDT width and
excitation frequency of 60 MHz. .................................................................................... 89
Figure 6.4 Simulated vector field streaming velocity distribution for a 30 µl at its centre
along with the y axis depicted by the solid red line through the droplet centre. Different
RF powers (e.g., SAW amplitudes) have been computed for the 128o YX- black LiNbO3
SAW device with 60 MHz with 60 pairs of IDTs and a 2 mm SAW aperture. .............. 90
Figure 6.5 Numerical results showing the changes in the axis of rotation position for a
30 µl droplet excited by different IDT apertures with an RF power of 15.85 mW. The
first row shows a top view of the double vorticity; the second row shows the side view
focusing through the droplet centre, and the third row views the droplet centre from the
front. The yellow arrow in the first row indicates the SAW direction and the dot red line
represents the axis of rotation ......................................................................................... 91
Figure 6.6 Numerical results presenting the axis of rotation parameters as a function of
the IDTs aperture value for a 30 µl droplet with 15.85 mW and 60 MHz excitation
frequency ......................................................................................................................... 91
Figure 6.7 Comparison of experimental and numerical results of the x-component
streaming velocity measured at the top centre of the droplets at different RF powers
using a 128º YX-LiNbO3 SAW device with a range of SAW apertures (60 MHz and
pairs of IDTs with 30 fingers) for 2.5, and 5 µl droplet sizes ......................................... 92
Figure 6.8 Numerical simulations of the streaming velocity as a function of SAW
apertures for a 30 µl droplet excited using 12.59 mW RF; (a) and (b) scalar values of
streaming velocity measured at a height of 1,000 µm from the droplet bottom in the
SAW direction and droplet diameter as indicated by the solid red line in the droplet
illustrations; (c) scalar values of streaming velocity measured at the droplet centre
through its height; (d) vector values of radial streaming velocity components measured
at 1,000 µm height from the droplet bottom and 800 µm from the SAW-droplet
interaction area as depicted by the red line through the droplet illustration ................... 95
Figure 6.9 Numerical results showing the changes in the centre line (axis of rotation)
position for different droplets sizes at RF power 15.85 mW. The first row represents the
two vortices as seen from the top; the second represents the side view through the
droplet centre; the third represents the droplet centre from droplet front (away from the
IDTs); the fourth focuses into the droplet centre as seen at the back of the droplet (near
the IDTs). The yellow arrow in the first row indicates to the SAW direction and the dot
red line represents the central line of circulation. ........................................................... 96
xxv
Figure 6.10 Numerical results represent the changes in the parameters of the axis of
rotation with the droplet volume using 0.5 mm IDT width and 15.85 mW RF power ... 97
Figure 6.11 Dimensionless numerical values of the axis of rotation position as a
function the droplet volume for a 0.5 mm IDT width and 15.85 mW RF power ........... 97
Figure 7.1 Illustration showing the initial mass fraction used in this study with a value
of m = 1.0 (dyed water) at the droplet base for a 70 µm height from its base in the y
direction, and value of 0.0 elsewhere (pure water) ....................................................... 102
Figure 7.2 Three dimensional images of the simulated mixing process for a 5 µl water
droplet, using 128 º YX-LiNbO3 SAW devices with 0.5 mm SAW aperture and excited
by a frequency of 39.92 MHz at an RF power of 0.5 mW. The first row shows different
illustrations of the droplet at different views and mass fraction ranges; Column (a): the
mixing process in 3D volume images using mass fraction range 0.0 ≤ m ≤ 1, and the
black arrows indicate the velocity vectors of the flow field; Column (b): 3D images of
the mixing process looking through the droplet by cutting slices into it, as shown in the
first row, using smaller range of mass fraction 0.0 ≤ m ≤ 0.5 ; column (c) similar to
column (b) but covers the largest mass fraction range of 0.5 ≤ m ≤ 0.1. ...................... 107
Figure 7.3 Side view snapshots of SAW-induced internal streaming in a 5 µl water
droplet, where dried particles of food dye were placed underneath the droplets. After the
SAW excitation, the dye colour quickly fills the whole droplet volume. The black arrow
with dash line shows the fluid flow inside the droplet and the red arrow indicates the
direction of the SAW propagation. ............................................................................... 107
Figure 7.4 Normalised mixing intensity results for a 5 µl droplet, using 500 µm aperture
SAW device at a RF power of 0.5mW, and with an initial mass dye particles
concentration of m =1 for a 70 µm high layer from the droplet base and m = 0 elsewhere
(pure water); (a) deviation in the steady state mixing intensity as a function of Rd / lSAW
for different mass fraction ratios (b) 3D captured clips of the droplet showing the effect
of Rd / lSAW ratio on mixing efficiency ........................................................................... 109
Figure 7.5 Variation of mixing efficiency for 2.5 µl droplets as a function of Rd / lSAW for
different RF power, using 500 µm apertures SAW devices. ........................................ 110
Figure 7.6 Probability distribution function (PDF) quantifying the distributions of the
dye particles for different Rd / lSAW ratios at 0.5 mW RF power; (a) for a 2.5 µl droplet;
(b) for a 5 µl droplet. The probability values of the histogram were obtained through
normalising the total mixing volume ]^ by a total droplet volume ]_`_ ..................... 112
xxvi
Figure 7.7 Variation of mixing efficiency, and streaming velocity (both from
experiment and simulation) as a function of droplets radius, using 500 µm apertures
SAW devices with Rd / lSAW ≈ 1.1 and 0.5 mW RF power ............................................ 113
Figure 7.8 Mixing efficiency (MIP % for mmen) as a function of time for (a) 2.5 µl
water droplets - RF power of 0.5 mW (b) 5 µl water droplets - RF power of 0.5 mW,
(c) of 2.5 µl water droplets at Rd / lSAW = 0.56 for different RF powers of 0.015, 0.05
and 0.5 mW. .................................................................................................................. 115
Figure 7.9 Simulated streaming velocity profiles measured along two different axes into
a 2.5 µl droplet for a range of Rd / lSAW ratios, using 500 µm aperture SAW device with
an RF power of 0.5 mW; (a) measured along the z axis at 500 µm height from the
droplet bottom; (b) radial distribution measured along the y axis at the droplet centre 117
Figure 7.10 Measurements of acoustic streaming force at SAW interaction point and
along the propagation direction of the longitudinal wave towards the top centre of 5.0 µl
droplet, and for Rd / lSAW ratios; the black line in the droplet show the measuring path of
acoustic streaming force ................................................................................................ 119
Figure 7.11 Simulated results showing the changes in the streaming patterns with
Rd / lSAW ratio, and for 2.5 µl droplet using 0.5 mm aperture SAW device and 0.5 mW
RF power. The first row shows a top view of the double vorticity; the second row shows
the side view focusing through the droplet centre, and the third row views the droplet
from the front. The yellow arrow indicates the SAW direction and the red broken lines
the axis of rotation......................................................................................................... 120
Figure 8.1 Photograph of an experimental setup used for height effect measurements 124
Figure 8.2 Schematic illustration of experimental and numerical setups; (a) Top view;
(b) Cross sectional view; (c) Captured Cross-section image of 4 µl droplet from side
view during the experiment with a gap height (H) of 1,113 µm ................................... 125
Figure 8.3 Experimental measurements of maximum streaming velocity as a function of
RF power for a ~3 mm droplet diameter and different gap heights, using a 128º YXLiNbO3 SAW device with a 1.5 mm aperture excited by a frequency of 60 MHz ....... 126
Figure 8.4 Experimental results of streaming velocity at the top of a droplet as a
function of gap height for different RF power levels using 128º YX-LiNbO3 SAW
device with a 1.5 mm aperture excited by a frequency of a 60 MHz; (a) Droplet
diameter of 3.0 mm; (b) Droplet diameter of 2.2 mm................................................ 128
Figure 8.5 Numerical results showing the maximum streaming velocity at the top centre
of the droplet as a function of gap height for a 2mm droplet diameter and different RF
xxvii
power levels, using a 128º YX-LiNbO3 SAW device with an excitation frequency of 60
MHz. ............................................................................................................................. 129
Figure 8.6 Leaky SAW induces body (streaming) force; (a) illustration shows
attenuation of leaky SAW by liquid coupling and the propagation direction of an
induced longitudinal wave; (b) calculated streaming force at SAW interaction point and
along the propagation direction of the longitudinal wave towards the upper glass slide
....................................................................................................................................... 131
Figure 8.7 Numerical results of Reynolds number as a function of normalized gap
height for 2 mm droplet diameter excited by a range of RF powers using a 128º YXLiNbO3 SAW device with 1.5 mm aperture and excitation frequency of a 60 MHz .... 132
Figure 8.8 Experimental captured images of a droplet located on a 128º YX-LiNbO3
substrate in line with a SAW device with 1.5 mm aperture and gap height of a 65 µm
(top view) (a) Before applying the RF power; (b) after application of a 20 W RF power
and excitation frequency of 60 MHz, showing the heating and evaporation ................ 133
Figure 8.9 Numerical simulation results of the velocity profile for a 2 mm droplet
diameter with different gap heights and measured at the droplet centre through its
height, using a 128º YX-LiNbO3 SAW device with a 1.5 mm aperture excited by a
frequency of 60 MHz; (a) at an RF power of 5 mW; (b) at an RF power of 100 mW . 134
Figure 8.10 Cross-sectional numerical simulation results of velocity vectors values of
2mm droplet at gap height of 1,000 µm and measured at the centre of the droplet
through its height; using a 128º YX-LiNbO3 SAW device excited by a frequency of 60
MHz ; (a) at an RF power of 5 mW; (b) at an RF power of 100 mW. Coloured vectors
show flow direction and velocity value ........................................................................ 135
xxviii
Chapter 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1
General Introduction
Over the past few years, life sciences in parallel with microfluidic technology have
shown significant advances and resulted in the establishment of a new field of research
known as a micro total analysis system (µTAS) [3]. In a µTAS, the whole laboratory
processes of chemical analysis of small amount of fluids are integrated on very small
surface of a microfluidic chip, similar to that presented in Fig.1.1 [4]. This process of
integration is also known as Lab-on-Chip (LOC) [4-6], which involves shrinking of
different microfluidic processes to very small and accurate micro devices and the
miniaturisation of chemical and biological systems. There are different considerations
for scaling down the size of micro devices; for example, the small volumes of reagents
can be efficiently treated in the micro devices. Consequently, the cost of expensive
reagents is reduced and less processing energy is needed in the biological and chemical
labs [7, 8]. Also, the processing time is reduced and more homogenous reaction
conditions can be achieved [5, 9].
Figure 1.1 Example of biochip for Lab-on-chip [4]
Decrease the volume of fluid in some technical problems associated with microscale
volumes. For example, pumping of very small amount of materials (liquids and
components) in such microscale dimensions becomes difficult, due to the significant
increase in viscous and capillary forces with significant reduction in the dimension of
characterised system [10, 11]. Additionally, in chemical and biological micro-devices,
moving of fluids in small scale channels like capillaries must be laminar flow due to
the small values of Reynolds number [12]. In such microscale systems, effective mixing
1
by diffusion is difficult and the efficiency is low because it needs large length scales and
long duration, which are quite limited in many microfluidic applications, such as
biochemical and biological analysis [13, 14], where a fast and efficient mixing process
is normally essential. In addition to the above problems, there is no conventional
pumping system that can work effectively with small quantities of fluids such as sessile
droplets, neither in closed channels nor on free surfaces.
In order to produce microfluidic devices for LOC technology, the above mentioned
technical problems must to be addressed. Recently, surface acoustic waves (SAW) have
been demonstrated as a novel pumping technique that can be fully integrated in the
microfluidic devices without mechanical or moving parts [15]. It is known that when a
liquid layer (either in bulk or droplet form) lies in the propagation path of the SAW, the
wave energy couples into the liquid medium [16], inducing mixing [17, 18], pumping
[19], jetting or atomisation [20, 21] of the microdroplets, depending on the SAW
applied power. The main characteristic feature that make the SAW devices an attractive
technology for different microfluidic applications is that it can handle both discrete
droplets on a free flat surface or continuous flow microchannel with an effective mixing
strategy for a fast and homogenous mixing process [22]. Furthermore, it is easily
fabricated and integrated into microfluidic systems, which makes it an excellent
solution for the portability and miniaturization approaches of the LOC systems.
SAW-driven microfluidics have been classified in the literature [23] according to the
geometrical boundaries of the fluid under the SAW application: i.e., SAW-based
microdroplets (sessile droplets) and SAW-based microchannels (continuous flow). To
the best knowledge of the author, the SAW-fluid coupling mechanism is not yet fully
understood and the current studies reported in the literature provide insufficient theories
to quantitatively describe the influences of different design parameters (e.g., SAW
excitation frequency, etc) on the efficiency of the SAW devices as an actuation
technology for microfluidic systems. This is because most of the experimental and
theoretical studies were based on two dimensional (2D) observations [24, 25]. Whereas,
the streaming flow induced by the SAW-droplet coupling is mainly a three dimensional
(3D) phenomena. In order to design an efficient SAW device for driving the LOC
systems, the induced flow phenomenon of SAW streaming must be thoroughly
understood.
2
1.2
Research Objectives
This thesis focuses on the understanding of the interaction mechanisms between SAWs
and microdroplets. To study the hydrodynamics behaviours of the induced streaming
phenomena, a 3D numerical model has been developed for this system of SAW-droplet
coupling. The 3D model has been applied for a comprehensive and systematic analysis
of SAW-induced droplet streaming, with the aim of developing an efficient SAW
device for LOC systems. To achieve the objective of this research, the different
parameters of SAW system configurations have been investigated by conducting 3D
numerical simulations with experimental validations.
1.3
Thesis Outline
This thesis has been divided into eight chapters as described below:
Chapter 1: Introduction. This chapter gives a brief introduction background of the
present work and provides an overview of the research objectives.
Chapter 2: Wave Generation and Propagation Background. This chapter gives a basic
background of an elastic wave generation and propagation followed by a general
description of the SAW devices, including the effect of surrounded medium on the
characteristic behaviours of SAW propagation.
Chapter 3: Literature Review. This chapter gives a review of the research work that has
been done on SAW-based microfluidics, considering both the experimental and
theoretical studies, and then introduces the current problems needed to be addressed.
Chapter 4: Streaming Phenomenon. This chapter gives an introduction to the acoustic
streaming theory and describes the experimental apparatus, materials and methods used
in this study. It provides an overall description of the numerical theory, technique and
computational fluid dynamic (CFD) code used in this research. It also explains the
physical mechanisms of the different streaming phenomena induced by the interaction
between the SAW and liquids.
Chapter 5: Acoustic Streaming and Hydrodynamic Nonlinearity. This chapter reports a
systematic experimental and numerical investigation on the role that flow inertia played
3
in the development of acoustic streaming induced by a Rayleigh SAW in a sessile
droplet.
Chapter 6: Influences of Configuration Parameters on Streaming Phenomenon. This
chapter presents experimental and numerical results for the effects of characteristic
parameters on the performance of the streaming phenomenon of liquid droplets, such as
liquid volume, applied power and aperture of the SAW device.
Chapter 7: Frequency Effect on Mixing Performance of Rayleigh SAW. In this chapter,
the effects of SAW excitation frequency, on acoustic streaming of ink particles inside
microdroplets generated by a SAW have been studied; their affect on the mixing
efficiency of the SAW devices has been investigated, using 3D numerical simulations
with experimental verification.
Chapter 8: Scaling Effects in SAW Streaming. This chapter reports an experimental and
numerical investigation of the scaling affects in the flow hydrodynamics for confined
microdroplets induced by surface acoustic waves. The characteristic parameters of the
flow hydrodynamics were studied as a function of the separation height, H, between the
LiNbO3 substrate and a top glass plate, for various droplets volumes and RF powers.
Chapter 9: Conclusions and Future Work. This chapter provides overall concluding
remarks and suggestions for the future work.
Contribution to knowledge:
The novel contribution of this study can be briefly summarized as: (1) identified the role
of hydrodynamic nonlinearity on the development of SAW acoustic streaming and
found a new dimensionless parameter, , the ratio of acoustic force to surface tension
that characterises the linear and nonlinear streaming, and the deformation of droplets;
(2) enhanced the understanding of the streaming mechanisms including microparticles
concentration and mixing process by SAW in microdroplets through the 3D numerical
simulations, for which the CFD models were calibrated by Lab experiments.
4
Chapter 2
WAVE GENERATION AND PROPAGATION BACKGROUND
This chapter provides a basic background and theory of a SAW generation and
propagation in an elastic piezoelectric solid, including the effect of surrounded medium
type on the characteristic behaviours of SAW propagation.
2.1
Introduction
SAW devices have been used since the 1940’s [26], for example, in many applications
including signal processing, such as filters and oscillators [27]. In addition to this, they
have been applied in other areas as sensors [28]. Furthermore, a new aspect has been
directed toward the applicability of SAW devices in microfluidic systems [29]. The
notion of microfluidics emerged during the 1970’s, when the first system of
miniaturised gas chromatograph was developed [30], in which the microchannels were
fabricated on the surface of a silicon wafer. Later in the 1990’s, considerable progress
and advances in microfluidic systems have been made towards producing miniaturised
devices for many scientific applications, including chemical and biological laboratory
processes, such as integrated devices for DNA analysis [31]. These systems were
essentially enabling the analysis of small volumes of liquid ranging from the micro to
nano litre scale. In this context, the term of LOC emerged, showing the possible
application of such microfluidic systems in life sciences [8]. For liquids to be analysed,
there are several components required, even for a simple microfluidic system. This
includes a pumping device and the structure within which the liquid can travel.
Generally, the geometry and diameter of microchannels, through which the liquids or
reagents are transported, are in the range of 10 to 500 µm [32]. Typically, these
channels are fabricated on the surface of an appropriate substrate material such as
quarts, silicon, glass, or a piezoelectric crystal, where in most cases the chip-size is
about 1cm3 or even less [33, 34]. Currently, due to the progress in production
approaches, complicated and reliable chips for chemical and biological applications can
be produced [35]. The main advantages of micro devices include the compactness,
portability, and lack of moving parts. This allows for the running of massive numbers of
experiments with huge data delivery, with less consumption of expensive substances
such as chemical and biological materials, and also the possibility of integrating
multiple micro-processes on one chip.
5
For pumping fluids in microfluidic systems, different pumping techniques have been
reported in the literature, such as diaphragm displacement, electrohydrodynamic and
electro-osmotic micropumps [36]. Generally, such techniques do not allow handling
discrete reagents and need the microchannel to be completely filled with fluids to work
efficiently. Recently, a novel approach utilising a SAW as an actuation force has been
proposed; this can handle continuous or discrete reagents not only in microchannels, but
also on the free surfaces [23].
The aim of this thesis is to analyze acoustic streaming induced by the SAW in
microfluidics. Therefore, this chapter introduces the basic concepts and theories that are
necessary to understand the principle of SAW propagation and its excitation. The
influence of a fluid on the substrate surface on the behaviour and mode of an excited
SAW is also shown.
2.2
Bulk Waves in Elastic Solids
In this section, the wave equation of a non-piezoelectric, homogenous and isotropic
elastic solid is derived, using Newton’s second law and Hook’s law of elastic
deformation. The later considers the relation between the mechanical stress, T, and
strain, S of small elastic distortions. Later, to emphasize the mechanical characteristics
of piezoelectric solids, the piezoelectricity is introduced into the wave equation, which
is an important effect that couples the mechanical waves with the electrical field
applied to the piezoelectric substrate [37].
2.2.1
Wave equation in a non-piezoelectric solid
An elastic solid is a material which returns to its original state when the external forces
responsible for its deformation are removed, and in which all internal stresses and
strains become zero. For an infinitesimal volume element dV = dx1 dx2 dx3, or a point
under distortion within an isotropic homogenous substrate, in the absence of external
forces and piezoelectricity, the equation of displacement neglecting gravity can be
described using Newton’s law by [37]:
a
bc U^ bd^e
b_c
bfe
6
2.1
Here, L is the mass density of solid substrate, 8 is the displacement component along
the corresponding Cartesian axes 9 . The exerted forces on an infinitesimal volume dV,
are those raised from interactions of neighbouring volumes, as described by the
symmetrical stress tensor 7 that indicates to nine quantities, corresponding to i, j =1,
2, 3 [37]. Here, 7 represents the components of the forces per unite area that are
exerted by the material on one side of the surface in 9 direction. If j k, 7 describes
the stress forces, and if j l k, 7 describes the shear forces. However, the real
distortion of an infinitesimal volume dV of the rigid solid body undergoes the
displacement can be expressed by a symmetrical strain tensor of 6 [38].
mno
V bUn bUo
p
q
r , ^, e, n, o V, c, W
c bfo bfn
2.2
Usually, the relationship between the stress and strain of an elastic solid links via the
elastic coefficients (or stiffness tensor) using Hooke’s law of elastic deformation
[37-39]:
d^e s^eno mno
2.3
Due to the symmetry of tensors 6 and 7 , an interchangeable in the order of either the
first two or the last two indices of the stiffness tensor , defined in the above
equation of Hooke’s law, and does not affect the elastic constants [37].
s^eno se^no , and s^eno s^eon
Then, substituting Eq. (2.2) into Eq. (2.3) gives:
d^e
V
bUn V
bUo
s^eno
q s^eno
c
bfo c
bfn
2.4
Since on the right side of above equation, so that it leads to the following
three-dimensional version of Hooke’s law [39]:
d^e s^eno
bUo
bfn
2.5
7
The wave equation in a non-piezoelectric solid can be obtained by combining the
Newton’s second law of motion (Eq. 2.1) and the Hooke’s law of elasticity (Eq. 2.5):
a
2.2.2
bc U ^
bc U o
s
^eno
b_c
bfe bfn
2.6
Wave equation in a piezoelectric solid
It is known that a piezoelectric effect, is one of existing methods that widely used for
the excitation of ultrasonic acoustic waves on a solid crystal [37]. The piezoelectricity
physics can be demonstrated by considering a piezoelectric crystal that placed between
two parallel metallic plates that act as electrodes, as shown in Fig. 2.1 [40]. If the crystal
is not stressed, the centres of positive and negative charges of the crystal atoms are
symmetrical (see Fig. 2.1), indicating no polarisation is initiated. However, if an
alternating compressive or tensile stress is applied to the opposite faces of the
piezoelectric crystal, unsymmetrical distribution of positive and negative charges is
induced (i.e., a molecular dipole), where the centres of the both charges becomes nonidentical [40]. This process of mechanical distortion, leads to the accumulation of
electrical charges on the electrode surfaces and hence to the generation of an electrical
potential difference across the electrodes. In this case, the mechanical energy is
transformed to an electrical energy. Alternatively, this process of a piezoelectric crystal
distortion can be reversed if an electrical potential is applied to the electrodes. This is
results in a mechanical distortion of crystal lattice, due to molecular polarization [40]. In
this second case, the electrical energy applied to the crystal is transformed into a
mechanical distortion. Thus, piezoelectric crystal is a solid material that can be
mechanically deformed when an alternating electric field is applied or vice versa.
Figure 2.1 Illustration of mechanical energy transformation into an electrical energy
[40]
8
Therefore, piezoelectricity means that, if a stress is applied to a piezoelectric crystal, not
only the strain is produced, but also a potential difference between the opposite faces of
the piezoelectric solid, is generated. So far, the above equation, (i.e., Eq. (2.6)) of wave
motion describes the elastic deformation of isotropic solids in the absence of a
piezoelectric effect. Since the interest of this thesis work is the acoustic wave induced
by a piezoelectricity, this effect must be introduced in the above equation of motion.
Thus, Hooke’s law of strain is extended to include an additional term , representing
the strength of an electric field. The constitutive equations which can be used to
describe the electric displacement for the piezoelectric solids are expressed as [37]:
d^e s^eno mno x yeno zn
2.7
|e yeno mno q }en zn
2.7
here, the strength of electrical field is approximated by a gradient of scalar electrical
~
potential K as; x
, where is the piezoelectric tensor that relates the
~
electrical potential to the equation of elastic wave displacement. The relation between
the electric displacement and electric field is linked via the dielectric permittivity tensor,
I , measured at constant strain [37]. By using an electrical field approximation in
equations 2.7(a) and (b) and substituting the results into the equation of displacement,
Eq. (2.1) and into the Poisson’s equation;(
~
~
0), with the definition of stain tensor,
(i.e., Eq. (2.3) and Eq. (2.5)) gives the following equations [37, 39]:
bc U o
bc
bc U ^
a c x s^eno
x yeno
bfe bfn
b_
bfe bfn
2.8
yeno
2.8b
bc U o
bc
x }en
bfe bfn
bfe bfn
Generally, these equations describe the motions of different types of bulk wave modes,
depending on the properties and the crystal cut of a piezoelectric material used to
transform an electric field into a mechanical deformation.
9
2.3
2.3.1
Rayleigh Surface Acoustic Wave
Introduction
Since the early 1990’s, SAW technology has become an interesting area of research
[41], especially in the development of microfluidic systems [18]. The propagation mode
of SAWs on an isotropic elastic solids was first described theoretically by Lord
Rayleigh in 1885, in which he described the energy of acoustic wave was restricted near
the free surface of an elastic substrate, thus this type of the wave is often called a
Rayleigh wave [42]. In the Rayleigh wave mode shown in Fig. 2.2, the motion of
particles in a solid substrate have two components in the sagittal plane of the substrate;
a surface-normal component and a surface-tangential component with respect to the
wave propagation direction
[42].
Mainly, this type of surface acoustic wave is
generated on
piezoelectric substrates after applying an alternating electric field via a
coupling with
interdigitated transducers (IDTs) [39], as detailed in the following
sections.
Propagation
Figure 2.2 A sketch of Rayleigh wave showing its propagation in an elastic solids [43]
2.3.2
Propagation characteristics of Rayleigh wave
The Cartesian coordinate system within an isotropic half-space piezoelectric structure
used for the discussion of a surface acoustic wave is illustrated in Fig. 2.3. This acoustic
wave is also known as a Rayleigh wave [39], in which the particle displacement of an
elastic medium has only two components, one is a longitudinal component, 82 , of the
tangential displacement to the SAW propagation, and the other is a transverse
component of the vertical displacement, 8: , with no variations in the direction of the 9%
axis.
10
Figure 2.3 Coordinate system for surface waves showing propagation direction, where
n indicates the wave propagation direction
As shown in Fig. 2.3, the origin of the coordinate system is at the surface of an isotropic
solid with the 9: axis is perpendicular to the free surface. The mechanical stresses at
traction-free boundary (9: = 0) are expressed as [37, 40]:
dVW dcW dWW
2.9
Thus, the solution of the wave equation, using the constitutive equations (2.8) that
satisfies the above boundary condition Eq. (2.9), which describes the displacements of
an existing Rayleigh wave induced on an isotropic half-space solid that propagates
along the 92 axis, is given by [37]:
V nfV x _ ,
UV U
W &fV x _
and UW U
2.10
Here, 8;2 and 8;: are the displacement amplitudes of the longitudinal and transverse
components, respectively, G is the angular frequency of an applied electrical signal, and
& is the wave number. The results demonstrated that the motions of wave particles at
any solid depth are elliptical, as shown in Fig. 2.4(a). For a typical isotropic material,
the amplitudes of wave displacement, 8;2 and 8;: , decay with the depth inside the
substrate, which become negligible values in a few wavelengths from the surface [37,
39, 44], as shown in Fig. 2.4(b).
11
(a)
(b)
Figure 2.4 Characteristics of a Rayleigh wave in an isotropic half-space elastic solid
(e.g., piezoelectric substrate); (a) Displacement field of the wave particles; (b) Decay of
V and U
W as a function of solid depth [44]
displacement amplitudes U
2.3.3 Rayleigh wave excitation
The basic structure of a SAW device consists of an Interdigital Transducer (IDT) and a
piezoelectric substrate. An example of a SAW device is shown in Fig. 2.5. It contains
interdigitated electrodes of a metallic material like aluminium deposited on the surface
of a piezoelectric substrate, such as lithium niobate (LiNbO3) or quartz [27]. These
substances convert the electric field into a mechanical stress and vice versa.
A complete surface acoustic wave device consists of two sets of comb-shaped IDTs, one
acting as transmitter (electric energy → mechanical energy), which is connected to an
excitation source, seen in Fig.2.5, and the other as transducer (mechanical energy →
electric energy). However, in many microfluidic applications, only the first set is used.
An application of an alternating signal to the IDTs induces a mechanical vibration and
periodic deformation, which is defined as a small earthquake wave on the piezoelectric
substrate, as shown in Fig. 2.4 (a). This in turn, results in an elastic SAW that
propagates away from the transducer with wavefronts parallel to the IDTs, as shown in
Fig.2.5. For the special type of wave mode of a SAW being discussed here, the
efficiency of a given piezoelectric material in converting the electric field into an
associated mechanical wave is typically measured using an electromechanical coupling
coefficient, $ %, which is defined in terms of the piezoelectric constant , elastic constant
and dielectric permittivity I as $ %
.
#
[45]. Also, this characteristic coefficient can
be measured experimentally [38]; to be:
12
c x
c∆]
]Y
2.11
Here, |∆@| denotes the difference in wave velocity of a free (e.g., unperturbed surface)
and a shortened surface (i.e., thin high conducting metal film deposited on the surface,
between the two set of the device IDTs, shown in Fig. 2.5) of piezoelectric substrate,
and @ is the unperturbed SAW velocity. Usually, the values of $ % in most piezoelectric
materials are small (a few percent) as shown in Table 2.1 for some typical piezoelectric
substrates.
Figure 2.5 Surface acoustic wave device [27]
Table 2.1 Parameters of some typical piezoelectric substrates for SAW devices [40]
Material
Crystal Cut
SAW Axis
Velocity, ]Y (m/s)
c %
Quartz
Y
X
4990
1.89
LiNbO3
Y
Z
3158
4.5
LiNbO3
128º
X
3992
5.3
There are different designs for the SAW device electrodes or IDTs according to the
purpose of the application. This includes a straight interdigital transducer of a
conventional SAW device, and focused interdigital transducer of a focused SAW
device, which concentrates the acoustic wave in a single point on the substrate surface
[46], as shown in Fig.2.6. For research purposes, the first design of parallel IDTs has
been considered in this thesis, for which the SAW devices could be efficiently excited if
13
the wavelength of a SAW, λ, matches the periodicity, P, of the IDTs (e.g., λ ≈ P)[40], as
sketched in Fig. 2.6(a). This is achieved when the IDTs of the SAW device excited by a
design frequency, f, defined by the following equation [40, 47]:
]Y
2.12
where, @ denotes the propagation velocity of the Rayleigh wave in the substrate, as
listed in Table 2.1. Normally, the SAW wavelengths are in a micrometer range, and the
wave amplitudes (e.g., the normal displacement of the surface, seen in Fig. 2.4(a)), are
in a nanometre range [1, 48].
Figure 2.6 Schematic illustration of the IDTs on the substrate surface for; (a) parallel
IDTs of a conventional SAW device; (b) curved IDTs of focused SAW device, where
Da is the degree of arc and fL the geometric focal length [46]
2.4
Raleigh Wave with Liquid Loading
So far, the characteristic behaviours of a Rayleigh surface acoustic wave propagating
along a free surface of the piezoelectric elastic crystals have been explored [49]. In this
section, a Rayleigh wave propagating on a surface of liquid-loaded piezoelectric crystals
is considered, and the basic theoretical ideas are discussed, describing the influences of
an adjacent fluid to the solid surface on the characteristics associated with Rayleigh
wave propagation.
2.4.1 Attenuation by ambient media
Earlier in this chapter (e.g., Sect. 2.3.2), it was indicated that the elliptical motion of the
surface particle in a Rayleigh wave has two components, one is normal to the surface 8:
and the other is tangential 82 . When a liquid medium is loaded on the free surface of
the piezoelectric crystal, the normal component couples with a liquid layer, causing
14
changes in the density of an adjacent fluid layer [50]. This leads to the emission of
compressional (longitudinal) waves into the fluid medium. In the same time, the
tangential component is coupled to the adjacent fluid via the liquid viscosity N [50],
which leads to frictional losses. However, any matter exposed to the surface of the
substrate along the SAW propagation, especially liquids absorbs a certain part of the
SAW energy, causing a strong interaction between the liquid and SAW [47]. Both the
emission of longitudinal waves and friction losses would contribute to the attenuation of
a Rayleigh wave, inducing a new wave mode, know as a Leaky Rayleigh wave [51]. In
the following sections, the attenuation of the Rayleigh wave due to the emission of
longitudinal compressional waves will be discussed first, followed by the attenuation
due to frictional loss.
2.4.1.1 Attenuation by emission of compressional waves
As indicated previously, when a liquid layer lying on the free surface of a piezoelectric
substrate, the normal component of the particle motion associated with the surface
waves couples with the adjacent liquid, resulting in an emission of longitudinal waves
into the liquid, as illustrated in Fig. 2.7(a). Because the velocity @M of longitudinal sound
waves in the liquid is less than that of a Rayleigh wave in solids, @ , these waves will be
radiated into the fluid at an angle Q, known as Rayleigh angle Q [50]:
XY
]
1
]Y
2.13
Where, PM is the wavelength of longitudinal waves in the fluid and P the wavelength of
a Rayleigh wave or SAW, as shown in Fig. 2.7(a). The value of Rayleigh angle Q , is
about 23º, for 128o YX-LiNbO3 substrate [52]. The portions of acoustic energy leaked
into the adjacent fluid and the attenuation of the associated Rayleigh wave were given in
details by Dransfeld and Salzmann [50]. For a surface layer element with a thickness of
P and a solid substrate of width , as shown in Fig. 2.7 (b), the energy E transferred per
second through the surface element by the Rayleigh wave can be expresed as [50]:
z c
c
a]WY ⁄ c
15
cc a]WY c
2.14
where, ρ is the desnsity of the solid substrate and a is the amplitude of the Rayleigh
wave using the normal componet of the particle displacement [50]. As both the
amplitude of the longitudinal wave in the adjacent fluid layer and the amplitude of the
Rayleigh wave at the substrate surface are similar, the acoustic energy dE emitted by
the substrate surface into the adjacent fluid is expressed as [50]:
z cc f a ]W ⁄
c
cc f a ] ]cY ⁄
c
2.15
Here, LM is the fluid density. The emission of an acoustic energy into the fluid medium
results in an energy loss of the Rayleigh wave with an absorption coefficient E' , which
was estimated to be [50]:
¡
V⁄z z⁄f a ] ⁄a]Y
2.16
Typically, the amplitude of the Leaky (damped) Rayleigh wave attenuates to 1/e of its
initial value over a distance of a few wavelengths from its coupling with the fluid [50].
Figure 2.7 An illustration of (a) Rayleigh wave attenuation by radiating longitudinal
waves from the substrate into the adjacent liquid at an angle X of XY ; (b) an element of
the solid surface showing the leakage of Rayleigh wave energy into the fluid [50].
16
2.4.1.2
Attenuation by viscous friction
The energy loss due to the coupling of the tangential component of the surface particles
of associated Rayleigh wave into the adjacent liquid layer was studied in detail by
Dransfeld and Salzmann [50], using the same surface element shown in Fig. 2.7(b). If ̀
is the tangential componet of the particle displacement amplitude of the surface wave,
the dissipated acoustic energy, by viscous forces at the adjacent fluid layer to the
surface area 9 of the substrate element (see Fig. 2.7(b)) can be expressed as [50]:
V
z ¢⁄£ ]c f
2.17
c
Here, @ is the tangential particle velocity at the surface-liquid interface, and µ is the
fluid viscosity. The term δ is the decay length for the adjacent liquid velocity due to the
viscous coupling of the shear wave component to the adjacent fluid (i.e., a measure of
effective thickness of the boundary layer driven by the shear wave) [50],
£ cc¢⁄a
2.18
V⁄c
From Eq. (2.14) using ̀ @⁄G , the shear energy flow in the Rayleigh wave along the
substrate surface can be given as [50]:
V a]Y ]c
z
c
2.19
Therefore, the corresponding energy loss of the Rayleigh wave due to the presence of
frictional viscous forces can be described by the absorption coefficient EF , which is
estimated to be [50]:
¥
¦V⁄z§ z⁄f
a ¢W /c
©c a]cY
V⁄c
2.20
Typically, the contribution of the viscous losses in the attenuation of the Rayleigh wave
is negligible in comparison with the contribution of the longitudinal waves, i.e.,
EF ª E' [50, 53].
17
2.5
Internal Streaming
So far, it has been shown that when a liquid layer (e.g., liquid droplet shown in Fig. 2.8)
lies on the free surface of the SAW device, the Rayleigh wave establishes an emission
of longitudinal pressure waves upon its arrival at the boundary between the solid
(substrate) and the liquid. Due to the mismatch in the sound velocities between the solid
and the liquid medium, these waves were diffracted into the liquid by an angle known
as a Rayleigh angle θR, as shown in Fig. 2.8. In addition to this, the emission of
longitudinal waves into the fluid results in the attenuation and damping of the Rayleigh
wave within a few wavelengths underneath the liquid, which changes its mode into a
Leaky SAW (LSAW) [52], as seen in Fig.2.8. This interaction between the fluid and the
SAW results in the body force acting on the fluid volume, known as the acoustic
streaming force [54]. These forces are referred to the action of Reynolds’ stress of the
fluctuating flow due to sound wave propagation into the liquid medium, which can be
expressed as [55, 56]:
??????
«^e a ¬
¨
2.21
where, the symbols of i and j = 1, 2, 3 are the fluctuating components of the flow
velocity, <, in the three coordinates x, y and z, respectively, while the upper bar
indicates the mean value of these velocities products [55]. The spatial gradient of the
Reynolds’ stress due to velocity fluctuations results in a steady force Fj acting in the
body of fluid medium within the propagation distance, which can be written as :
W
Ze x ¯
^°V
??????????
ba
¬ ¬®
bf^
2.22
These forces can induce an internal circulation into the liquid droplet, known as acoustic
streaming [29, 57], if the acoustic power is high enough (see Fig. 2.8 for more details).
18
Figure 2.8 Sketch of SAW stream acting on liquid droplet [58]
Furthermore, an increase in the applied power can cause movement of the droplet in the
SAW propagation direction, depending on the droplet volume and substrate surface
treatment [17]. Moreover, if the intensity of SAW power is increased further, the droplet
will be atomised [21]. According to Uchida et al. [59], these SAW induced longitudinal
waves are significantly influenced by the viscosity of the liquid, and their attenuations
are much higher than those excited by any conventional ultrasonic resonator. The
transformation from a SAW into a LSAW depends on the viscosity and density of the
fluid loaded on the substrate surface. An analytical formula for the streaming force of a
LSAW has been derived based on Nyborg’s theory of acoustic streaming [54]. Both
experimental and theoretical studies showed that the SAW streaming force is strong
enough to induce internal streaming inside the droplets or eject small liquid particles
from liquid layers in contact with the SAW. It has been concluded that SAW streaming
depends on the frequency, power and aperture of the SAW in addition to substrate
surface, fluid volume and viscosity [60-62].
2.6
Summary
In this chapter, some basic background of the concepts and the theories that are
necessary for understanding the principle of the SAW generation, propagation and
excitation using the piezoelectric materials, were introduced. The influence of liquids
loading on the characteristic behaviours and mode of an excited SAW is also shown.
19
Chapter 3
LITERATURE REVIEW
This chapter gives a review of the research work that has been achieved on surface
acoustic waves based microfluidics; focussing on the relevant studies that have been
previously conducted using SAW in the different LOC applications. This is divided into
two main section; experimental studies and numerical studies.
3.1
Experimental Study of SAW-Based Microfluidics
Recently, there have been many approaches utilising the streaming phenomenon of
SAW liquids coupling in numerous engineering applications for digital microfluidics
[49]. In the following sections, a review on SAW technology and their current microfluidic applications is presented.
3.1.1
SAW for acoustic mixing
Mixing of reagents inside small liquid volumes is an essential process in many chemical
and biological applications. However, this is a difficult task due to the small dimensions
of fluids being considered, especially when sessile droplets are used [22]. In this
context, SAW-induced streaming (see Fig. 2.8) can be utilised to overcome such
microfluidic limitations. The experimental work of Wixforth (see Fig. 3.1) [16] showed
that a small amount of fluorescent dye spot deposited on the substrate surface just
before a 50 nl water droplet was placed on top of it, was quickly dissolved and
distributed into the whole droplet volume after applying the SAW; this is due to the
internal acoustic streaming induced inside the droplet. Figure 3.1 shows two snapshots
of this mixing process, which were taken half a second apart[16]. As can be seen from
Fig. 3.1, the induced acoustic streaming can be used to mix the dye particles inside the
droplet effectively, a phenomenon which is a good indication towards the possibility of
dissolving chemical species in small droplets using the SAW technique [16].
20
Figure 3.1 Snapshots of SAW-induced internal streaming in a 50 nl droplet, showing
the dissolving process of a dye spot deposited on a SAW device surface [16]
Kulkarni et al.[63] has introduced a new approach for chemical synthesis on small scale
droplets (of about 40 nl), utilising the surface of a piezoelectric substrate as a reactor
and the SAW as an actuation technique and energy source at high applied powers, as
shown in Fig. 3.2. In general, the authors have demonstrated a new approach for
enhancing chemical reactions in droplets volumes utilising SAW energy, where fast
reactions and clean chemical products can be achieved.
Figure 3.2 Photo of a ~ 40 nl droplet on the surface of SAW device that was used
during a chemical reaction experiment [63]
The SAW induced mixing works not only in an open geometry like sessile droplets, but
also in closed fluid geometries. For example, Frommelt et al. [64] reported that after
applying a SAW, the fluorescent beads in a water droplet (~ 0.35 µl) confined by a gap
space (~ 240 µm) between a top glass slide and a substrate surface, were effectively
mixed in a short time period in comparison with the time that the pure diffusion would
take. Figure 3.3 shows experimental images of mixing snapshots taken at a certain time
after applying the SAW power. As can be seen from the images, the frequency
modulation plays an essential role in the characteristic behaviours of a SAW induced
mixing. Maezawa et al. [65] has expressed a similar view, where he demonstrated that
the sweep in the driving frequency resulted in changes in the flow profiles, showing an
improvement in the mixing performance and time in which a SAW was coupled to the
fluid through the bottom of a cell cavity, as shown in Fig. 3.4.
21
Figure 3.3 Top view series images of the mixing experiments of beads in a confined
water droplet taken about 105 s after applying the SAW power, using an 128º Y-cut
LiNbO3 piezoelectric substrate for different modulation frequencies; The SAW device
was operated at a constant power in (a), and (b)-(f) modulated at frequencies 0.042,
0.083, 0.17, 0.34, and 0.68 Hz, respectively [64]
Figure 3.4 Fluid streaming induced by an IDT fitted at the bottom of the cell, the solid
white arrows indicate to the source points, where the higher driving frequency is, the
smaller distance between the two sources [65]
According to Frommelt et al. [64] and Maezawa et al. [65], the modulation of signal
frequency contributes to the chaotic advection, which in turn results in mixing of the
system in an effective manner. Recently, the work of Shilton et al. [22] provides
evidence of such chaotic advection in the SAW system by comparing the flow
trajectories of fluorescence particles inside microfluidic wells (see Fig. 3.5(a)) with
other new trajectories over the time, as shown in Fig. 3.5(b). Their results showed that
the strength of chaotic advection was increased with an increase in the SAW applied
power, and hence the mixing performance of SAW induced streaming. This was
attributed to the increase in streaming velocity of the particles that resulted in an
intensification of the disturbances in the fluid [22]. In addition to this, it was observed
that the viscosity of the fluid also influences the strength of a chaotic advection, which
is decreased for an increased fluid viscosity. This increase in the fluid viscosity
suppresses the flow velocity that gives rise to the disturbances in the fluid, which are
necessary for the a chaotic advection to induce effective acoustic mixing [22].
22
(a)
(b)
Figure 3.5 (a) Schematic illustration of experimental setup; (b) Tracked trajectories of
fluorescence particles in a microfluidic well induced after SAW-fluid coupling [22]
Furthermore, SAW induced mixing in closed channels have also been demonstrated [58,
66]. Sritharan et al. [58] has investigated the mixing performance of SAW-induced
streaming in a simple Y-shaped microchannel, where the IDT of the SAW device was
fitted underneath the channel and near the Y-junction, as depicted in Fig. 3.6 (a). The
channel was fabricated using Poly Dimethyl Siloxan (PDMS) with a height of 75 µm
and a width of 100 µm. The channel contains two water inlets, with one of them
containing fluorescent beads, as shown in Fig. 3.6 (a) and (b). Figure 3.6 (c) shows that
before applying the SAW power, the flow in the microchannel was completely laminar,
where the separation line between the two fluids can be easily distinguished. Whereas,
coupling of a SAW with the fluids through the bottom of the channel induced effective
mixing in the channel flows, as shown in Fig. 3.6 (d). The detailed results of the
evaluated mixing efficiency suggested that a higher SAW amplitude is, the more
efficient mixing was achieved with decreasing distance from the channel entries [58].
Figure 3.6 Sketch and illustration of a microchannel used in the investigation of SAW
induced mixing; (a) Sketch showing the setup used during experiment; (b) Image
23
showing the distribution of the fluorescence bead at Y-junction; (c) Image of the
channel flow when the SAW was not operated; (d) Image of the channel flow with
SAW excited from underneath the channel [58]
More recently, Zeng et al. [67] also reported an investigation of SAW induced mixing
in a Y-type microchannel. In his study, the launched SAW coupled transversally to the
flowing fluid into the bonded PDMS microchannel, using focused IDTs, as shown in
Fig. 3.7 (a). The dimensions of the fabricated microchannel were 240 µm in width and
85 µm in height, and the microchannel was bonded to the top surface of a LiNbO3
piezoelectric substrate. Deionized (DI) water and fluorescent dye solution were injected
inside the microchannel during the experiments. It was observed that when a SAW was
excited, the fluorescent dyes were quickly mixed with the water inside the channel. It
can be easily observed from the images of Figs. 3.7 (b) and (c) that the fluids were
homogenously mixed in the presence of a SAW. The mixing performance was
characterised through measurement of the variations in the intensity of florescence dye
that extracted from the images of mixing process at a specific region, as shown in Figs.
3.7 (c)-(e). The normalized dye concentrations were obtained by comparing the
obtained fluorescent intensities with the peak intensity of an original dye [67]. These
profiles in Figs. 3.7 (d) and (e) indicate that a nearly uniform distribution of fluorescent
dye was observed across the width of the channel after the SAW was launched, showing
the effectiveness of the proposed technique in mixing these two fluids.
Figure 3.7 Characteristics of SAW-induce mixing in a Y-type PDMS microchannel; (a)
Illustration showing the position of F-IDTs with the bonded microchannel; (b) No
mixing was induced without a SAW ; (c) Mixing observed after the SAW was excited;
24
(d) and (e) Normalized concentration of fluorescent particles measured along the width
of channel for no-SAW and SAW cases, respectively [67]
3.1.2
SAW for particles concentration
A study by Li et al. [68] revealed that the phenomenon of SAW induced streaming can
also be used to concentrate microparticles distributed in a liquid droplet. It has been
demonstrated that asymmetric positioning of the droplets in the SAW propagation path
(see Fig. 3.8(a)), or making a diagonal cut in the substrate (see Fig. 3.8 (b)), results in an
asymmetric distribution of a SAW radiated across the substrate surface and coupled to
the liquid, which is in turn induces an azimuthal flow circulation in the droplet [68].
Monitoring of the fluorescent particles and live yeast cells inside the liquid droplets
after applying the SAW power showed that the induced flow circulation causes
migration of particles or cells towards the centre of the droplet and clustering at its base
within time period ranging from two to twenty seconds, depending on particles type,
size, and applied power to the SAW device (see Fig. 3.9). The concentration time was
decreased with an increase of the applied power, due to increased an inward radial force
of shear gradient that drives the particles towards the droplet centre [68]. A study by
Shilton et al. [69] reported that the internal flow circulation was enhanced when the
excited SAW on a 128º YX-LiNbO3 substrate was focused through using curved IDT
patterns (see Fig. 2.6(b)), which is attributed to the increased wave amplitude.
Consequently, a concentration of fluorescent particles suspended in a 5 µl water droplet
was achieved quickly in a shorter time than that of the straight IDTs.
Figure 3.8 Schematic illustration for breaking the symmetry of SAW propagation; (a) A
droplet positioned asymmetrically in the SAW propagation path; (b) Piezoelectric
substrate with a diagonal cut[68]
25
Figure 3.9 Snapshots showing the concentration process in a 5µl liquid droplets, using
a SAW device of 128º YX-LiNbO3 substrate with straight fingers pattern of a 1200 µm
aperture and ~ 8.6 MHz signal frequency at an RF power of 330 mW; (a) Images
showing accumulation sequence of fluorescent particles at the droplet centre of 1µm in
diameter ; (b) of live yeast cells that quickly concentrated at the centre of the droplet, in
2 s [68]
So far, many studies have been reported utilising SAW-induced streaming for particle
concentration [15, 24, 70-72]. For example, Wilson et al. [72] has demonstrated that it is
possible to concentrate blood cells into small samples of diluted blood using SAW
together with a phononic structure. Figure 3.10 shows the rapid concentration of the
blood cells in a 10 µl droplet within a short time, which was dependent on the SAW
frequency and power [72].
Figure 3.10 Sequence images of blood cell concentration using a diluted blood sample
of a 10 µl droplet volume, based on 128º YX-LiNbO3 SAW device with a straight IDTs
aperture of 1 mm at power of 103 mW, with phononic crystal structures [72]
3.1.3
SAW for particle focusing and sorting
Recent advances in biological studies have drawn attention of many researchers to
develop an effective, compact, and non-destructive actuation system that can treat
particle and cells individually for Lab-on-Chip technology. Shi et al. [73] proposed a
novel method for focusing microparticles in microfluidic channels utilizing a standing
surface acoustic wave (SSAW). SSAW can be launched by using a SAW device with
26
pairs of IDTs that are aligned on either sides of the microchannel, as shown by the
schematic illustration of device in Fig. 3.11(a). The interaction of two excited waves
from both the IDTs results in the generation of a standing wave, which in turn induces a
periodic distribution of pressure nodes and anti-nodes in the fluid medium inside the
microchannel [73]. Thus, the induced acoustic radiation forces by a fluctuating pressure
cause the suspended particles in the fluid to move towards the pressure nodes or antinodes, depending on its density and fluid property [73]. However, if the channel width
is designed to have only one pressure node, the particles will be focused in the centre of
channel, as shown in Fig. 3.11(a). Using a PDMS microchannel measuring 50 µm wide
and 1.3 cm long bonded to the surface of a 128º YX-LiNbO3 SAW device, polystyrene
particles of 1.9 µm in diameter were focused in the channel centre after the SSAW
interacted with the fluid [74], and the subsequent tracking images showed that the
trapped particles were distributed uniformly across the channel width, as demonstrated
in Fig. 3.11(b).
Shi et al. [75, 76] also found that the SSAW device was capable of separating particles
of similar density in a microfluidic channel based on its size, where the particles were
aligned separately into the channel, as shown in Fig. 3.12. This is because the acoustic
radiation force exerted on a particle is proportional to its volume (r3), whereas the
viscous force is only proportional to the particle radius (r) [75]. The particles with larger
volumes will move towards the pressure nodes in the microchannel faster than the
smaller particles. Therefore, the particles in the microfluidic channel can be separated
based on size, as shown in Fig. 3.12.
Figure 3.11 (a) Schematic illustration of a SSAW device inducing particle focusing
with demonstration showing its working mechanism; (b) Focusing of polystyrene beads
in the centre of a PDMS microchannel, which was monitored at different position [73]
27
Figure 3.12 The top sketch indicates the monitored sections (I-III) of particles
separation in a PDMS channel measuring 150 µm width and 80 µm height bonded on a
128º YX-LiNbO3 piezoelectric substrate; the bottom image shows the fluorescent
images at the sections (I-III), where the green colour indicates polystyrene beads of 4.17
µm in diameter and red colour indicates the 0.87 µm beads, where the beads were
separated in ~360 ms [75]
Meng et al. [77] demonstrated that the position of particles within the microfluidic
channels can be changed by a phase-shifting between the two input signals of opposite
IDTs, which results in changes in the position of pressure nodes of the SSAW.
Accordingly, the acoustic radiation forces exerted on these particles will be changed
also [77]. Therefore, the particles will move to a new position, depending on a phase
deviation. Similar work has been reported by [78] and [79].
3.1.4
SAW for fluid pumping
As discussed before, a SAW-fluid interaction at relatively small acoustic powers
induces acoustic streaming within small droplets, a phenomenon which can be used to
mix different chemical or biological species. However, if the applied SAW power is
increased to some extent, the streaming phenomenon can cause a deformation to the
droplet free-surface, which eventually leads to the movement of the droplet into the
direction of SAW propagation, if the substrate surface is chemically t pre-treated (e.g.,
hydrophobic surfaces). Wixforth [16] reported an experimental work in which a water
droplet was placed on the surface of a piezoelectric substrate against the propagation
direction of an intensive pulsed SAW, i.e., coming from the left side in Fig. 2.20. Once
the SAW interacts with the droplet, an internal acoustic streaming was observed inside
28
the droplet, which causes the droplet deformation and droplet shooting, as depicted in
Fig. 3.13.
Figure 3.13 Deformation and pumping of a 50 nl water droplet on the surface of a
LiNbO3 SAW device. In pictures 2 and 5, the droplet is under an intensive pulsed SAW.
In pictures 3 and 6 the droplet returns to its original shape after the SAW is turned off
[16]
Figure 3.14 depicts snapshots of series of images taken during the experiments, showing
the programmable movement of three droplets on the surface of a microfluidic chip that
contains multi-programmable IDTs. Three droplets were moved individually on this
chip using a SAW-induced streaming. The author reported that after the droplets were
merged, acoustic streaming within the new droplet led to a faster chemical reaction than
that of the normal diffusion process [16].
Figure 3.14 Snapshots of a SAW-driven microfluidic process for three droplets of ~
100 nl in volume each; (a) initial state; (b)-(d) a series of images presents the movement
of droplets and the occurrence of a chemical reaction (e.g., colour change) after the
droplets were merged [16]
29
Beyssen et al. [80] experimentally studied the motion of different types of liquid
droplets, ranging from 2 to 20 µl in volume on the surface of a 128º YX-LiNbO3
piezoelectric substrate. An IDT of a 5 mm aperture and an excitation frequency of ~ 40
MHz were used for experiments. Results showed that the fluid viscosity strongly
influences the pumping speed of droplets. The speed of a water droplet decreased from
40 mm/s to 2 mm/s when a mixture of water/glycerol was used instead of water.
Tracking of the droplet motion using a high-speed camera revealed a periodic
vibration/pumping phenomenon of droplets during their motion, as shown in Fig. 3.15.
Du et al. [17] has conducted an experimental study investigating SAW-induced
streaming and actuation (pumping) of liquid droplets. Results demonstrated that both
the droplet size and applied voltage have significant influences on the pumping speed of
droplets, which was increased with an increase in the signal voltage, as demonstrated in
Fig. 3.16. It can be shown that the droplets with smaller volumes moved at a speed
faster than those of larger volumes, and a maximum velocity of ~140 mm/s for a 1 µl
water droplet at an applied signal of 40 V. However, when the surface of a piezoelectric
substrate was not hydrophobically treated, a signal voltage of up to a 45 V was not
enough to cause the droplets to move on this chip, and only droplet deformation was
observed. In contrast, significant pumping can be realised easily after the substrate
surface was treated with Octadecyltrichlorosilane [17, 19, 81].
Figure 3.15 Periodical distortion of a 2 µl water droplet; (a) Subsequence images taken
at time steps 0, 0.0028, 0.0056 and 0.0084 s, respectively using a high-speed camera;
(b) Evaluated changes in droplet height h0 and d0 [80]
30
Figure 3.16 Sliding velocity of water droplets as a function of applied voltage for a
LiNbO3 treated with Octadecyltrichlorosilane [17]
SAW technology has also been demonstrated to pump fluids in closed microfluidic
systems. Renaudin et al. [61] reported the squeezing of 1.5µl water droplets through a
gap of 300 µm in height between a top plate and a LiNbO3 piezoelectric substrate, as
sketched in Fig. 3.17(a). When a hydrophobic guided layer was used, the droplet was
moved faster in a straight trajectory. Otherwise, the droplets moved in a wavy trajectory
on a hydrophilic area, as shown in Fig. 3.17(b).
hydrophobic track
Figure 3.17 Sketch of a SAW-driven guided droplet system; (a) Side view; (b) Top
view[61]
Girardo et al. [82] also reported SAW-induced pumping for fluids in a closed
microchannel. PDMS microfluidic channels of lateral dimensions between 210 and 520
µm are deposited on a LiNbO3 substrate, which was aligned along the propagation path
31
of a SAW, as shown in Figs. 3.18 (a) and (b). A water droplet of ~ 2 µl was placed at
the opposite end to the IDTs (see Fig. 3.18 (c)). When an RF signal was applied to the
SAW device, the droplet was extracted into the channel towards the other channel end
due to atomisation and condensation of water drops within the microchannel. During the
experiments, the speed of forced water into the microchannel reached up to 2.6 mm/s, as
shown in Figs. 3.18 (d)-(f). Although a high power up to 1 W was needed to induce an
efficient pumping, a SAW-driven fluid extraction demonstrated an attractive method for
withdrawing fluids in LOC systems of biological applications. Similar work has been
reported by Cecchini et al. [83], where a counter-flow of fluid into a PDMS microchannel was induced by a SAW.
More recently, Masini et al. [84] demonstrated that the SAW-induced counter-flow
mechanism is capable of withdrawing fluids in a complex web of microfluidic channels.
Figure 3.19 shows geometrical configuration of a PDMS microfluidic network that was
mounted onto a LiNbO3 SAW chip. As can be seen, multiple IDTs were patterned onto
the chip for a programmable fluid driving. The widths of the channels ranged from 200
to 300 µm, with a width/height ration of 10:1. The results showed that a water droplet
of about 0.5 µl was successfully extracted into the network, and the speed of droplet in
each microfluidic path is dependent on the power applied to the active IDTs and the
distance between them and the droplet [84].
Figure 3.18 Experimental configuration of SAW-induced pumping in a microchannel;
(a)-(b) demonstrating the placement of the PDMS channel on a LiNbO3 substrate, and a
2 µl water droplet; (d)-(e) Withdrawing of the droplet after applying the electric signal
[82]
32
Figure 3.19 (a) Top view image showing the whole microfluidic chip that contains
multi IDT’s; (b) Side view sketch showing the water droplet placed at the channel
entrance [84]
3.1.5 SAW for fluid jetting and atomization
More than twenty years ago, Shiokawa et al. [52, 85, 86] reported a jetting phenomenon
of a liquid layer coupled with a SAW. When the applied power to the SAW device
exceeded a certain peak value, discrete particles were ejected from the liquid layer at an
ejection angle equivalent to a Rayleigh angle Q , forming jet streams [85], as shown in
Fig. 3.20 (a). The wave was excited using a classical straight IDT design, which was
patterned on a 128º YX-LiNbO3 substrate with an aperture of 2 mm, using an excitation
frequency of 50 MHz. Bennes et al. [87] found that the jetting phenomenon is strongly
dependent on the hydrophobic nature of a substrate surface. On a hydrophobic surface,
narrow bands of water jet were observed. In contrast, multi water jets with an increased
number of unidirectional droplets were observed for a hydrophilic surface, as seen in
Fig. 3.20 (b) and (c).
More recently, research by Tan et al. [20] suggested a new approach for a SAW-induced
jetting phenomenon utilising a couple of opposite focused IDTs (FIDTs), similar to
what has been sketched in Fig. 2.6 (b). The FIDTs were fabricated on a 128º YXLiNbO3 piezoelectric substrate with a wavelength of ~ 200 µm. The radiation of surface
acoustic waves at Rayleigh angles from both sides into a water droplet placed on the
IDT’s focal point resulted in a deformation of water droplet, which was elongated
vertically forming a coherent cylindrical liquid beam, as shown in Fig. 3.21 (a). Near to
the finishing of jetting process, the elongated jet suffered from the classical RayleighPlateau instability and breaking up of small droplets. Depending on the liquid volume,
properties and SAW wavelength, when the acoustic power was increased above a
33
certain threshold value, break-up of small droplets from the tip of the liquid column
were observed [20], as shown in Fig. 3.21 (b). However, at low applied powers, which
were smaller than the threshold value, only droplet vibration was observed with an
amplitude height dependent on the SAW power and surface tension. Due to increased
demand of droplet generation technology, the direct jetting capability of the SAW
devices could find many innovated applications in inkjet printers or other biological
analysis, etc.
Figure 3.20 (a) Image of jet streams that formed during experiment by a SAW from the
water layer on a hydrophobic surface of a 128º YX-LiNbO3 piezoelectric substrate [85];
(b) Jet without surface treatment (hydrophilic), and (c) for a hydrophobically treated
surface, in which the water jet is more directional than that without treatment [87]
Figure 3.21 Jetting phenomenon of a water droplet initiated by focused SAW, using
a 128º YX-LiNbO3 piezoelectric substrate; (a) Subsequent images showing the early
stages of the jet initiation for water droplet placed at the focal point of focused IDT’s;
(b) Images showing the process of jet breakup and droplets formation by increasing of
the applied power above a certain threshold value, which enables the acoustic and
inertial forces to overcome the interfacial forces of droplet surface tension[20]
34
Furthermore, atomization is another microfluidic process, which was reported utilizing
a SAW technology. A SAW atomiser was proposed for the first time in the early
1990’s by Kurosawa et al. [88]. At a relatively high input power, for a thin liquid film
of about 10 µm in height was coupled with a Rayleigh wave, the displacement velocities
of the vibrating surface was transferred to the liquid layer, inducing capillary waves at
the free surface of thin film, as shown in Fig. 3.22 (a). When the intensity of Rayleigh
wave is high enough, a fine mist of liquid particles was observed, as seen in Fig. 3.22
(b). This is due to a strong destabilisation of liquid interface, which leads to the
atomisation of the thin film [88]. The measured atomisation rate was about 0.1 ml/min
at an applied power of a 2.5 W and an excitation frequency of ~ 10 MHz, using a 128º
YX-LiNbO3 SAW device with an IDT aperture of a 10 mm. Chano et al. [1]
demonstrated that the atomisation characteristics, such as the mist direction and height,
were dependent on the SAW input power.
More recently, SAW atomisation using high frequencies (e.g., ranging from 50 to 95
MHz) were reported by Ju et al.[89] indicating that the minimum input power required
for the atomisation process as influenced by the excitation frequency of a SAW device.
For example, the minimum atomization power was about 4 W for a frequency of 50
MHz, while it was about 24 W for 95 MHz. Similarly, the atomisation speed was also
influenced by the SAW frequency. Furthermore, the results showed that there is a
considerable drop in the mean measured diameter of atomised droplets with the increase
of frequency, where the estimated diameters of nebulised droplets were about 5.7 µm
and 2.7 µm at 50 MHz and 95 MHz, respectively [89].
Figure 3.22 Schematic illustration of atomization principle; (a) Oscillation effect of a
Rayleigh wave motion on an adjacent fluid layer, which was vacillated accordingly; (b)
Atomization of adjacent liquid film by a strong destabilization of capillary wave,
showing the mist formation [88]
35
In many cases, the SAW atomisers have provided a simple and fast technique for the
atomisation processes over a range of engineering and scientific applications. For
instance, Alvarez et al. [90] have used this technique for the generation a polymer
nanoparticles, which were spatially ordered in regular patterns onto the chip surface by
SAW-induced atomisation. During the experiments, a droplet of polymer solution was
loaded on the surface of a 127.68º YX-LiNbO3 piezoelectric substrate, on which straight
aluminium IDTs were deposited, as shown in Fig. 3.23 (a). When an input power was
sufficiently high, the radiated SAW translated the droplet into its propagation path (Fig.
3.23 (b)), leading to the formation of a thin film fluid layer, about 10 µm thick, as seen
in Fig. 3.23 (c). High surface acceleration (about 107 m/s2) inside the liquid layer by a
propagated Rayleigh wave contributes to strong destabilisation of the film interface,
leading to atomisation of the thin film. Finally, the thin film was atomised, leaving
behind spot patterns of polymer particles with a spatial periodicity depending on the
SAW wavelength [90], as seen in Fig. 3.23 (d). The sequences of droplet evaporation
and polymer pattern formation can be observed in Figs. 3.23 (e)-(h). Research by Friend
et al.[91] has achieved a similar result of polymer patterning, utilising this technique.
More recently, Qi et al. [92] has reported the extraction of liquid, protein molecules, and
yeast cells utilising the SAW atomiser, describing it as a promising technique for the
applications of drug delivery and medical diagnostics.
Figure 3.23 (a) Schematic illustration of SAW atomizer; (b)-(c) Side view images
using a high speed camera showing a droplet translation, distortion, thin film formation
36
and atomization;(d) Side view of formulated polymer patterns using a 20 MHz
excitation frequency; (e)-(f) Sequent images from top view showing the depiction of a
thin film atomisation and polymer particles patterning. The needle in images was used
to deliver the polymer solution onto the substrate surface but was not touching it [90]
3.2
Numerical Analysis of SAW-Liquid Interaction
Recent experimental studies have demonstrated that the SAW induced streaming can be
used for mixing, pumping, jetting and atomization of microfluidics, besides focusing,
patterning and sorting of microparticle [23, 49, 93]. However, an efficient utilisation of
these phenomena requires a full understanding of the hydrodynamic behaviours and
mechanisms in these SAW microfluidic systems. Computational modelling is one of the
methods that can be used for an in-depth analysis of the streaming phenomena induced
by the SAWs.
3.2.1
Streaming phenomena
To date, many attempts have been made to model the streaming phenomenon of a
SAW-fluid interaction investigating the characteristic behaviours of fluid dynamics.
Köster and Antil et al. [94-96] have provided a mathematical model for the case of fluid
movement in microchannels placed on top of a piezoelectric biochip. Generally, the
model approach was based on the coupling of piezoelectric and microfluidic equations
through two sets of governing equations, following a perturbation expansion method
presented in Eqs. (3.1). This enabled the containment of the two different time scales,
the sound field (nanoseconds) and streaming field (milliseconds) [54]. The first set of
equations, i.e., Eqs. (3.2), governs the sound field, and the second set, i.e., Eqs. (3.3),
governs the acoustic streaming. [94].
± ± q ±V q ±c q ²
W. V³
´ ´V q ´c q ²
3.1c
a a q aV q ac q ²
3.1b
Where 0, L and v denote the pressure, density, and velocity, respectively, while the
subscripts 0, 1, and 2 refer to the steady (ambient), first-order and second-order terms,
respectively. Based on the first-order approximation [54, 97-100], which treats the
37
coupled acoustic wave into fluid as a first-order perturbation, the developed governing
equations of wave propagation were stated as:
ba,V
q a, ¶. ´V
b_
W. c
a,
3.2b
b´V
¢
x¶±V q ¢¶ c ´V q ·¢¸ q ¹ ¶¶ · ´V
b_
W
bU
±V sc a,V , ´V
b_
3.2c
Where, v2 is the acoustic wave velocity, 8 82 , 8% , 8: the mechanical displacements
of a Rayleigh wave using Eqs. (2.8), 02 is the acoustic wave pressure, is the velocity
of compressional waves in the fluid, and LM , N, NO are the density, shear viscosity, and
bulk viscosity of the fluid, respectively. Following the assumption of Nyborg and
others [54, 97-100], which treated the acoustic streaming of ultrasonic waves as a
second-order effect, the governing equations of induced streaming flow involving
second-order terms were given as:
a, ¶ · ´c q S¶ · ¦a,V ´V §T
W. W³
Sa,V
3.3b
b´V
¢
T q a, S´V · ¶ ´V T x¶±c q ¢¶ c ´c q ·¢» q ¹ ¶¶ · ´c
b_
W
where, v% is the streaming velocity, and the brackets S . T in the above system stand for a
time-averaging of fast harmonic oscillations of the Rayleigh wave that interrupted the
A ¿À
steady-state flow, ST 1Á7 ¼A ¾
¾
½ [94]. This set of equations, i.e., Eqs. 3.3 (a) and
(c) describe the acoustic streaming as a stationary compressible flow problem (e.g.,
Stokes system). These equation were solved numerically in 2D using finite element
(FE) method for a water filled microchannel based on a 128º YX-LiNbO3 SAW device
[94]. Figure 3.24 shows a comparison between the flow patterns of the experimental
fluorescence images and that obtained from the numerical computation at an excitation
frequency of 100 MHz. As can be seen from Fig. 3.24, results for both experiment and
simulation are not in good agreement, where the simulation showed a single vortex,
whereas double vortices were produced in experiments. In the studies by Tan et al. [34,
101] for SAW streaming phenomena, a similar approach has been used for the case of
acoustic streaming induced in a rectangular groove type microchannel patterned through
38
the propagation path of Rayleigh wave onto a 128º YX-LiNbO3 SAW device. However,
it should be clearly noted that the above approach is only applicable for a creeping flow,
where the flow inertia is negligible [95].
Figure 3.24 Comparison for streaming results between an experimental data (a) and
numerical simulations (b), based on 2D computations of water loaded a 128º YXLiNbO3 piezoelectric substrate at an excitation frequency of 100 MHz [94]
More recently, Frommelt et al. [25] presented a new approach for determining the
acoustic streaming pattern that was induced by a SAW in a confined droplet between a
top glass slide and substrate surface, using finite element (FE) numerical method.
According to this study, the streaming phenomenon of a SAW-fluid coupling can be
modelled using the stationary Stocks equation, i.e., Eq. 3.4 of an incompressible flow,
where  · < 0. The SAW streaming was assumed driven by an external body force,
, which was generated in the fluid by SAW coupling [54].
x¶Ã q ¢¶ c ¬ q Z
3.4
In this equation, < represents the acoustic streaming velocity, and 3 is the streaming
pressure. According to Nyborg’s theory of acoustic streaming [54], radiation of a high
frequency ultrasound beam into fluids gives rise to steady body forces into the fluid
volume. This body force acts on a long-time scale of flow, leading to a steady state
fluidic flow, known as acoustic streaming. In Frommelt’s study, the body force was
calculated by developing a ray-tracing algorithm with the aid of experimental readings.
Frommelt’s study shows that the huge effort of using conventional finite element
method, (e.g., Eqs. (3.2) and (3.4)) for SAW streaming simulation can be decreased,
where good agreement between the experimental and numerical results was obtained, as
depicted in Fig. 3.25. A similar approach has been reported in a study of SAW-induced
microchannel flow by Schindler et al. [102]. However, it should be emphasised here
39
that the above model also assumes that the inertia effects of a streaming flow are small
and can be ignored [25, 64].
Figure 3.25 SAW streaming patterns in different SAW positions (depicted by narrows):
(a) Centre, (b) Side and (c) Outer part. The upper pictures represent the particles
trajectory and the bottom pictures represent ray-tracing stream simulation [25]
Further to the previous attempts, Sankaranarayanan et al.[48, 103] has developed a
coupled field fluid-structure interaction finite element model to investigate acoustic
streaming that is induced by a SAW on a fluid layer loaded SAW device. The fluid
flow was modelled using the transient incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. For
coupling proposes at the fluid-solid interface (e.g., between the piezoelectric substrate
and fluid layer), displacements and stresses have been assumed to be of equilibrium
conditions, (i.e., v% v2
ÄÅ
ÄÆ
) where the surface displacement of the piezoelectric
material, 8 was obtained by solving the equations of a Rayleigh wave motion, i.e., Eqs.
(2.8) simultaneously. Figure 3.26 shows an example of a streaming pattern that is
formed in a fluid domain of water, due to a SAW-fluid interaction.
Figure 3.26 Numerical streaming patterns generated in water on a YZ-LiNbO3 SAW
device, at an excitation frequency of 100 MHz and an applied voltage of 10 V; The
calculated velocities are in µm/s [103]
40
3.2.2
Droplet deformation
It has been shown earlier in this chapter (Sect. 3.1) that an increase in the applied RF
power above certain levels for the case of SAW-driven droplets, pumping, jetting and
atomization of the droplets could be induced. Understanding the physics behind these
phenomena using experimental measurements is extremely challenging because of the
difficulties in capturing the temporal, fine and complex dynamic behaviours of droplets
at high SAW frequencies [104]. Consequently, attention has been drawn towards the
theoretical investigations using numerical techniques. For example, Schindler et al.
[105] and Köster [95] studied a SAW-driven sessile droplets confined between the
liquid/air interface and the substrate surface in order to understand the physical
mechanisms lying behind the deformation of a droplet’s free surface. This explained the
internal fluidic flow by the surface acoustic wave, such as that presented in Fig. 3.15(a).
However, having a droplet deformed at its free surface along with its internal streaming
has added more complexity to the problem, because of the involvement of two phase
systems (e.g., water/air interface).
Schindler et al. [105] presented a finite element algorithm for computing the flows of
the free surface of a stationary droplet driven by arbitrary SAW body forces. It should
be noted here that Schindler’s algorithm was designed based on a certain fluidic
assumptions. For example, the fluidic flow should be an incompressible steady state
flow, and the inertial effect must be negligible (i.e., Eq. 3.4). Besides, a fixed SAW
body force was assumed, and its real distribution into the fluid domain was ignored.
Nevertheless, Schindler’s algorithm was capable of capturing the apparent free-surface
deformation by a SAW, and the simulation results matched the experimental results
presented by Wixforth et al.[16] (i.e., Fig. 3.13), as seen in Fig. 3.27(a). Schindler’s
work suggested that a free-surface deformation was due to the contribution of a large
acoustic pressure, regardless of the weak viscose forces. The problem was solved
numerically in two steps: (1) solving the previously prescribed microfluidic problem
(e.g., stationary droplet domain), by using the Stocks equation, i.e., Eq. (3.4), and
assuming a slip boundary condition at the droplet free-surface, (2) using these flow
results to solve a geometric equation, which is a consecutive update of the droplet
domain. Accordingly, the droplet free-surface boundary located by the finite elements
(i.e., Fig. 3.27(b)), moves by the applied fluidic stresses behind its surface, and then the
surface adjusts its curvature to balance the normal stresses on it by its tenacity to
minimize its free energy.
41
Figure 3.27 Numerical calculations of the droplet deformation and acoustic streaming
by a SAW; (a) streaming velocity and flow patterns; (b) FE computational grid [105]
Köster [106] extended the perturbation expansion model of compressible Stokes system,
i.e., Eqs.(3.3) for fixed geometries, in order to compute the free capillary motions at the
droplet interface induced by a SAW. The Köster technique for capturing the freesurface deformation was based on an arbitrary Lagrangian Eulerian approach, in which
the droplet domain follows the fluid motion [107]. Although the Köster’s model was
not able to capture or predict the initiation of capillary waves at the droplet free-surface,
it was able to predict the deformed droplet shape induced by the surface acoustic wave,
which matched the experimental results of the SAW-induced droplet distortion, as
shown in Fig. 3.28.
More recently, the work from Tan et al. [104] provided a clear insight into the capillary
wave dynamics in a two dimensional analysis, through the incorporation of additional
analytical equations together with the above perturbation fluidic model, supported with
experimental measurements. Their results suggested that at a low power regime, the
capillary wave amplitude and frequency are comparable to that of the Rayleigh wave at
the substrate surface. However, the amplitude of the free-surface displacement is much
higher than that of the substrate surface, inducing a low vibration frequency.
Figure 3.28 Finite element numerical results of SAW-induced streaming for the free
boundary domains (sessile droplets); (a) and (b) the droplet shape before and after the
SAW turned on in, respectively. [106].
42
3.3
Software for SAW Steaming Simulation
In the following, overviews for different available computational fluid dynamic (CFD)
softwares which were potentially proposed for a SAW simulation are summarised.
3.3.1
3.3.1.1
Commercial codes
ANSYS CFX
ANSYS CFX software is flexible and general purpose CFD package that is used in
academic and industrial environments for different levels of engineering simulations
using finite element analysis. It offers a lot of physical models that can be applied for
wide range of engineering applications [108].
3.3.1.2
ANSYS FLUENT®
FLUENT is a powerful ANSYS CFD packages for complex flow regimes from an
incompressible subsonic flow to highly compressible hypersonic flow. It is provided
with multi choice solvers for a wide range of engineering applications with the ability of
using flexible, deformable and moving meshes. Moreover, it has the function that
enables the user to define, added and implement of new model [109].
3.3.1.3
ANSYS Multiphysics
ANSYS Multiphysics represents a comprehensive CFD software for coupling different
applied physics like structures, thermal, fluid dynamics and electromagnetic simulation,
all in a single engineering package [110].
3.3.1.4
FLOW-3D
FLOW-3D software specialises in transient fluid dynamic and micro-fluidic flow for
confined and free surface flow in two and three dimensions, but is also able to handle
steady state problems [111].
3.3.1.5
COMSOL Multiphysics
COMSOL Multiphysics is easy-to-use software package. This package has already
predefined many of common physical problems. In COMSOL, the user can choose one
of these predefined problems and combine it with another one according to his defined
problem or he can implement his own partial differential equation and combine them
with other predefined physical equations. The user can also couple and define any
43
number of partial differential equations as he needs. Moreover, in COMSOL
Multiphysics, the interface with any CAD package is possible. The most sophisticated
modelling in COMSOL Multiphysics is the modelling of Microelectromechanical
Systems, which are usually a Multiphysics problem [112].
3.3.2
Free codes
This section contains the codes that are in public domain, which are available under
General public license (GPL) or under similar licenses.
3.3.2.1
MFIX Code
MFIX Code is a general purpose computer FORTRAN code based for finite volume
methods. This code has been developed to describe hydrodynamics, heat transfer and
chemical reaction. In general, it is a multiphase 3D flow code with interphase exchange.
This code is provided with full documentation, starting from the theory and numerical
guides to run available tutorials [113].
3.3.2.2
OpenFVM
OpenFVM code is one of the GPL computational fluid dynamic solvers. This code is
developed for 3D flow simulation on complex geometry by using finite element
method. It is capable to built unstructured meshes for arbitrary shapes and is able to
solve non isothermal multiphase equations. However, this code is still in its first steps
towards the developing process and there is no more information about its features, and
it does not come with any documentation [114].
3.3.2.3
Elmer
Elmer is an open CFD source code for Multiphysics problems. It uses finite element
methods for solving the partial differential equations. The source code is written in
FOTRTRAN 90, C and C++ programming languages. In Elmer, the user is able to
modify the predefined solvers or develop a new solver according to the user demand.
Elmer comes with a number of predefined models for fluid dynamics and coupled
physics. However, Elmer is not restricted with this predefined coupling models because
it can be coupled with other different physics [115].
44
3.3.2.4
OpenFOAM
OpenFOAM is an open source CFD software for the simulation of different physical
and engineering applications, starting from fluid dynamics with heat transfer, chemical
reactions and turbulent flow for single or multiphase flows to solid dynamics and
electromagnetic. The source codes in OpenFOAM are written in C++ programming
language. For the solution of partial differential equations, the finite volume numerical
method is developed. OpenFOAM can be used as any typical CFD code because it
contains a lot of predefined solvers for the different flow cases. It provides C++ libraries
that can be used in different models and it can be used as a 2D or 3D solver according to
the neediness of the user. In OpenFOAM different discretization schemes can be used.
Moreover, it provides structured and unstructured grids with uniform and non-uniform
meshing. However, OpenFOAM is not like any another GPL software because its utility
and library are fully accessible and extendable. OpenFOAM is provided with full
documentation for both the users and programmers [116].
3.3.2.5
OOFEM
OOFEM code is a free finite element CFD software released under GPL. This code is
suitable for transient incompressible flow and it provides semi implicit algorithm.
However, it can be used for the simulation of a two-phase flow in 2D for free and closed
surface flows. It provides volume of fluid (VOF) based on an interface tracking
algorithm. This code is provided with online documentation [117].
3.3.3
Software selection
In brief, according to the list of commercial codes, COMSOL Multiphysics is the best
one because as it was mentioned before the user also has the option of choosing
different models from the Multiphysics menu of the code and defining the
interdependencies himself. The user can specify his/her own partial differential
equations, and couple them with other equations and physics. On the other hand,
OpenFOAM is the best one from the free code list, and it is based on FVM and is
written using C++. OpenFOAM code is fully open for the development and changes
with complete accessibility to the source code, which allows the user to implement new
partial differential equations for further extension and improvement of available solvers.
This code is provided free with full documentation and a free discussion group on line
for any bugs occurring during the use of code. The other important thing is that the code
45
provides a huge list of physical libraries that can be used without adding any coding or
even needs some small modification to meet the user demands. OpenFOAM can be
used for Multiphysics applications with different grid structures. Besides, in
OpenFOAM, code solvers can run in parallel simultaneously on several distributed
processors of cluster systems, with applicability of mapping the course mesh results
onto the fine mesh. These features all contribute to improve the running time of huge
mesh cases, and help to move towards fast research progression. The use of commercial
codes is restricted by its blocked design, which limits the accessibility of the source
codes and existing libraries, and high licensing costs, while free OpenFOAM code is
completely extendable even in its C++ library. This lack in the freedom of research
work using commercial codes, could contribute to the delay in the researcher progress.
Therefore, in this research work, OpenFOAM code has been chosen to be used in the
modelling development of a SAW-fluid interaction.
3.4
Summary
In recent years, SAW devices and their microfluidic applications have drawn the
attention of many researchers extensively. The basic principles of the SAW, such as the
wave propagation, generation and its characteristic behaviours in solids and fluids, have
been introduced in this chapter. The acoustic streaming induced by the SAW in coupled
fluids is an important phenomenon with wide potential applications, especially when the
SAW device as a miniaturised and compact actuation part in MEMS devices for LOC
systems. Although the acoustic streaming phenomenon and its related microfluidic
studies have shown extensive progress in recent years, there is still much in-depth work
to be done and SAW induced fluidic behaviours to be explored, which could enhance
the understanding of this actuation mechanism. Currently, to the best of the author’s
knowledge, almost all the available experimental and numerical studies were generally
based on a two dimensional analysis. An efficient utilization of the different streaming
phenomena needs the hydrodynamics to be understood in three dimensions. For
example, the detail of a SAW-fluid coupling problem is still under consideration and the
three dimensional streaming phenomenon of SAW-driven sessile droplets has not been
truly understood. Also the inertial effects of flow hydrodynamics have been widely
ignored in literature, without clear justification. Therefore, this research work focuses
on the investigation of SAW streaming behaviour and wave/fluid coupling, using both
the experimental and numerical methods. This systematic study gives more in-depth
46
insight into the flow hydrodynamics generated by the SAW, which could significantly
help in designing efficient SAW parameters, towards system optimisation.
47
Chapter 4
STREAMING PHENOMENON
In this chapter the numerical and experimental methodologies developed to investigate
the acoustic streaming motion generated by a SAW in microdroplets are introduced.
The numerical results are validated through a comparison with an experimental data of
similar set up. The different streaming phenomena induced by a SAW into the liquid
droplets were explained using experimental observations and 3D numerical simulations.
4.1
Introduction
As shown in Fig. 4.1, SAW can be launched by applying an alternating electric field to
the IDT, which then propagates along the interface between the solid surface and gas
(air), and changes its mode to leaky SAW when it reaches a boundary between the solid
and liquids. As discussed in Chapter 2, this leaky SAW produces a longitudinal wave
that attenuates within a few micrometers depending on the liquid density and substrate
material property, which in turn establishes an effective body (streaming) force acting
into the fluid medium [86]. The longitudinal waves propagate into the fluid with the
Rayleigh angle ӨR [118], as shown in Fig. 4.1. The generated body force can create
significant acoustic streaming in the liquid and facilitate liquid mixing, stirring,
vibrating, pumping, ejection and atomization [119].
Figure 4.1 Illustration of SAW propagation into droplet
Acoustic streaming is known as an inherent fluid motion due to acoustic energy
attenuation of intensive ultrasound waves propagating through a fluid medium. This
48
phenomenon was first studied by Lord Rayleigh [120] then followed by Nyborg [54,
97] and Westervelt [121]. These authors calculated the flow motion due to ultrasound
propagation via the momentum equation of steady incompressible laminar flow driven
by an external body force :
a ¬ · ¶ ¬ Z x ¶Ã q ¢¶ c ¬
4.1
where U is the acoustic streaming velocity, P the pressure, LM and µ are the fluid density
and dynamic viscosity, respectively, is the acoustic body or streaming force term due
to ultrasound propagation, and the left side of Eq. (4.1) represents the hydrodynamic
nonlinear term.
Currently, most studies of SAW streaming are based on Nyborg’s assumption [54, 97].
He claimed that the acoustic streaming is a second-order effect and streaming velocity is
a second-order quantity. Therefore, the hydrodynamic nonlinear term i.e., LM < · Â <
in the above equation is a fourth-order quantity, which can be easily ignored. Later,
Lighthill [55, 56] argued that ignoring the hydrodynamic nonlinear term should be
dependent on its numerical value, but not on its mathematical order. He pointed out that
the second- order approximation for acoustic streaming is only valid for very slow fluid
motion, i.e., creeping motion of Reynolds number, Re smaller than one [56]. Kamakura
and Mitome [74, 122] showed that the hydrodynamic nonlinear term played a major
role in the generation of acoustic streaming, especially for a strong focused ultrasound
beam. However, during the studies of SAW streaming, the hydrodynamic nonlinear
term has been frequently neglected or ignored even at very high SAW powers and the
so-called linearised momentum equation used, (i.e., Eq.(3.4)) [25, 34, 41, 46, 48, 105,
123, 124].
SAW acoustic streaming in a microdroplet is a 3D phenomenon, whereas currently
SAW acoustic streaming numerical modelling is normally performed in a 2D mode,
largely due to the complication in developing a 3D model for the a nonlinear body force
term of the SAW-fluid coupling [25, 64]. Hence, a few of studies have been extended
into three dimensions for SAW microdroplet streaming [70]. To fully understand the
effects of the SAW streaming mechanism, it is important to be able to model the
mechanism in 3D in order to design efficient microfluidic SAW devices for
microfluidic application.
49
This chapter presents the numerical model and experimental methodology developed in
this study for the investigations of SAW-based microfluidics in a 3D, and focuses on the
physical mechanism of the different streaming phenomena induced by SAWs in the
microdroplets, such as a particle concentration in a water droplet using asymmetrical
SAW position.
4.2
4.2.1
Experimental Details
Experimental apparatus and signal measurement
The SAW devices were fabricated on 128o YX- black LiNbO3 substrates by sputtering
200 nm thick Aluminium to form the IDTs. The surface of the LiNbO3 wafers is
hydrophilic with a water contact angle of about 35o as can be observed in Fig. 4.2(a). In
this study, a spin-coated CYTOP® (Asahi Glass Co., Ltd., Tokyo., Japan) layer was
prepared to make the surface hydrophobic and increase the contact angle from about 35o
to 110o, as shown in Fig. 4.2 (b). The details of the SAW device fabrication have been
documented [17]. The finger width of the IDT electrodes determines the resonant
frequency of the SAW device[125]. In this study, an IDT with a finger width of 16 µm
was used, and an IDT aperture of 2,000 µm. The fundamental frequency, of the SAW
device was measured using an HP 8752A Network Analyzer, as shown in Fig. 4.3.
Using a network analyzer, the excitation frequency of the SAW device was swept over
arrange of signal frequencies, until the corresponding resonant frequency of the SAW
device was measured from the reflected signals. This is found in this study to be 62 ±
0.5 MHz, as indicated in Fig. 4.4.
Figure 4.2 Water droplets on LiNbO3 (a) untreated surface (b) hydrophobic surface
treated with CYTOP.
50
Figure 4.3 Photograph of the experimental apparatus used for of SAW induced
streaming experiments.
Figure 4.4 The reflection signal of a 128o YX- black LiNbO3 SAW device with IDTs
periodicity of 64 µm, measured using a network analyzer; the red arrow indicates to the
peak resonant frequency of the SAW device
To agitate the liquid droplets, the SAW was generated on the surface by applying an RF
signal to the IDTs using a standard signal generator MI 2019A, which was amplified by
an MI TF2175 RF power amplifier. The exact output reading PD applied to the SAW
device from the power amplifier was measured as a function of variable input powers,
Pin of the signal generator at a moderate range of excitation frequencies, ranging from
20 to 100 MHz, as presented in Fig. 4.5. This reading of the power amplifier was
calibrated using a Racal 9104 RF power metre. For flow behaviours, the resulted flow
patterns within the liquid droplet were captured using a standard digital CCD camera, as
illustrated in Fig. 4.3.
51
Figure 4.5 Output reading of an MI TF2175 RF power amplifier measured using a
Racal 9104 RF power metre for a moderate range on input power and excitation
frequencies, using a 128o YX- black LiNbO3 SAW device.
4.2.2
4.2.2.1
Streaming velocity measurement
Experimental setup
A high speed tracking technique was used for the visualisation and investigation of the
flow behaviours induced by SAWs in the water microdroplets (2.5 to 30 µl), as shown
in Fig. 4.1. The droplets were loaded at the centre of the SAW propagation path by
using a micro-volume Kit micropipette. For high speed videos recording, a high speed
camera (Kodak Motion Corder Analyzer with 600 frames per second) was placed above
the SAW device, directly above the test droplet, as shown in Fig. 4.6. In order to
measure the time variation of a SAW streaming velocity, polystyrene particles with
average diameters of 6 µm were placed inside the water droplets, which were
illuminated using a source of AmScope 150 W Haloids Light Microscope Illuminator,
and their motion was recorded (see Fig. 4.6). The specific gravity of the polystyrene
particles is 1.05. Using the video records, it was observed during the experiment that
when the SAW power was turned off, the tracer particles were suspended inside the
droplets and no motions were induced. This suggests that the polystyrene particle used
in this study does not subject to the relative motion of the flow inside the droplets, if the
acoustic power is turned on. Thus, these particles were treated as passive tracers that
52
move with the same streaming velocity and follow the stream paths of fluid flow, in a
similar manner to that assumed in [25, 64]; see also footnote 1.
Figure 4.6 Photograph showing a high speed camera experimental setup of a streaming
velocity measurement.
4.2.2.2
Measurement procedure
During the measurement of streaming flow, the high speed camera used in this study
was adjusted to a 240 frame per second with a resolution of 480 × 720 pixels. For
magnification, a Cosmicar lens was used, which provides 0.7 to 22 magnifications. The
measurement of streaming velocity was initiated after the SAW power was turned on
and the streaming flow of tracer particles was diminished, as shown in Fig. 4.7(a).
Then, the zoom and height of the High Speed Camera located directly above the droplet
were adjusted to achieve high quality images of the streaming particles within the focal
region (i.e., the specified area at the top centre of the droplet), as illustrated in Fig.
4.7(b)-(d). After locating the tracer particles in the foal region, the SAW power was
turned off. After the desired power of the signal generator was adjusted, the SAW
power, PD was turned on and the initiated streaming flow in the droplet was allowed to
reach a steady-state. Numerical results of this study suggested that the streaming flow
1
See EPAPS document no E-PRLATAO-100-082802 for the experimental methods for the dual-jet flow
patterns and other operation modes. For more information on EPAPS, see
http://www.aip.org/pubservs/epaps.html.
53
reaches a steady-state in 1~2 s, depending on the applied power and liquid volume.
Thus, after ~ 10 s the High Speed Camera was triggered to catch the images of the
streaming flow, as shown in Fig. 4.8(a).
Figure 4.7 (a) and (b) schematic illustration of a water droplet with seeded particles on
the SAW device, showing the focal region of High Speed Camera from top and side
view respectively; (c) and (d) captured images of droplet from top and side views during
the experiment.
In order to measure the streaming velocity of the tracer particles at the top centre of
droplets, a single pair streaming images was captured at different time periods, using a
high speed camera, such as in Figs. 4.8 (a) and (b). Using a reference scale i.e., width
of the device IDT, the distance ∆x that particle travelled during the time period ∆t
within focal region can be estimated, where x denotes the particle position, as shown in
Fig. 4.8(c). Thus, the streaming velocities were calculated from processed images
using <
Ç
ÇA
, where the precision of measurement using direct particle tracking is 0.06
mm ± 0.04 mm. However, to avoid large random errors in velocity measurements, 15
image pairs were taken in 10 s duration. Then, an average streaming velocity of a tracer
particle was calculated, using these image pairs. The standard deviation in streaming
velocity from an average value for the 15 mage pairs was estimated to be between ~ ± 2
% and ± 50 %, depending on the SAW applied power. This is attributed to an increased
54
blurring image of the tracer particle at higher powers i.e., 16 mW, besides the
uncertainty in the position and number of the tracer particles in focal region, see Fig. 4.8
(c)
2 mm
Figure 4.8 An experimental snapshots using high speed camera showing the particle
trajectory.
4.3
Modeling Details
4.3.1
4.3.1.1
Governing equations
Acoustic streaming
The generated streaming motion due to SAW energy attenuation in the liquid droplet is
assumed to be governed by the continuity equation, Eq.(4.2a) and the full laminar
incompressible Navier-Stokes equation (i.e., momentum equation), Eq. (4.2b) that is
driven by an effective SAW body (or streaming) force [122, 126]:
¶·¬
ba ¬
q a ¬ · ¶ ¬ x¶Ã q ¢¶ c ¬ q Z
b_
55
4.2a
4.2
The governing equation of the acoustic streaming force has been derived by Nyborg
[54], for an incompressible fluid, which is given by the following equation:
xZ a S´V · ¶ ´V q ´V ¶ · ´V T
4.3
where v2 represents the velocity of Rayleigh wave in the fluid, and the brackets S·T
indicate the time averaged (mean) value [54, 97]. Therefore, the nonlinear acoustic
streaming force can be calculated, once the wave velocity is known.
4.3.1.2
Leaky Rayleigh waves
As indicated earlier (see Section 2.4.1), the SAW changes its mode to a leaky SAW
once it interacts with the liquid volume. This leaky SAW establishes a longitudinal
wave within the liquid medium and propagates with a Rayleigh angle ӨR, as depicted in
Fig.4.1. Considering the surface displacements to be independent on the z coordinate
[127], the leaky SAW displacements are considered; ¦8 , 8 §, which can be expressed
by [52]:
Uf É yf±e_ · yf±xen¡ f · yf±x n¡ Ê
UÊ xe É yf±e_ · yf±xen¡ f · yf±x n¡ Ê
4.4
4.4
Here,E represents the attenuation constant,
c
c
]¡
VxË Ì
]
4.5
and @' and @M are the Leaky SAW velocity and the sound velocity in the liquid,
respectively. is equivalent to the SAW wave amplitude at the entrance point to the
liquid and the angular frequency G 2Í. The SAW number & 2Í⁄P is a real
number, where λ is the wave length, and the leaky SAW number &' & q k& is a
complex number with the imaginary part representing the SAW energy dissipation
within the liquid medium [48]. The leaky SAW number &' can be obtained be
extending the method of Campbell and Jones [86, 127, 128] to
structures
assuming
both
stress and displacement
condition at y = 0 ,(see Table 4.1), and @M =1 500 m/s.
56
to
the
solid-liquid
be continuous boundary
Table 4.1 Leaky SAW parameters calculated based on Campbell and Jones [46, 123]
Crystal
Rayleigh
Water loaded
Leaky SAW
Attenuation
Orientation
SAW
leaky SAW
wave number
Coefficient
Velocity
V
(m )
]¡
3994
3931+j68.1
]Y
4.3.1.3
velocity
(m s )
-1
128º YX-LiNbO3
-1
ki
-2768
2.47
Streaming force
If the wave displacements (ux, uy ) are replaced by the first-order wave velocities using
vÎ ∂uÎ ⁄∂t and substituting these values into equation (4.3), the two components of
streaming force are given, for an incompressible fluid, by [86]:
Zf xa ¦V q
ZÊ xa ¦V q
c
c c
V §É n^
· yf±cn^ f q
c
c c
V §É n^ V
V n^ Ê
· yf±cn^ f q
V n^ Ê
4.6
4.6
where E kE2 . The total SAW streaming force F can be calculated by Ò% q %
[86] , which is then given by Eq. (4.7). The force direction in the fluid is similar as the
Rayleigh angle Q [41](i.e., Eq. (2.13)) of the longitudinal wave radiation into the fluid
(see Fig. 4.1).
Z xa ¦V q
c W⁄c c c
É n^
V§
· yf±cn^ f q
V n^ Ê
4.7
The SAW force F acts in the main fluid volume as a body force, but the exponential
decay of the leaky SAW limits the influence of this force within the fluid volume. This
leads to a complete diminishing within a few microns from the interaction point
between the SAW and a liquid droplet. Therefore, substituting equations (4.6a) and
(4.6b) into equation (4.2b) and numerically solving Eqs. (4.2a) (4.2b) with suitable
boundary conditions can be used to predict acoustic streaming patterns induced by
SAW.
57
4.3.1.4
Boundary conditions and solution method
In this study, the case setup is based on a LiNbO3 SAW device with a wavelength of 64
µm and a resonant frequency of 62 MHz was used in the experiments, which was
indicated earlier in this chapter. Water droplets with different volume ranges were
loaded on the central and asymmetric positions on the SAW propagating path, as shown
in Figs. 3.9 (a) and (b).
(a)
(b)
Figure 4.9 (a) Illustration of a droplet positioned symmetrically on surface of a SAW
device; (b) asymmetric positioning of water droplet on the SAW device.
In all the streaming tests in this study, the RF powers for SAW streaming were low and
no apparent deformation in the droplet’s shape was observed during the experiment.
Therefore, the fluid can be assumed to form its equilibrium shape, and the small free
surface instability due to SAW microdroplet interaction was ignored in the simulation,
and the droplet was assumed to be confined within a stress-free boundary. A slip
boundary condition is assumed at the gas/liquid interface boundary and non-slip
boundary condition is assumed at the substrate (liquid-surface contact area). The droplet
domain in this numerical model was built using a curvilinear grid structure with grid
number of 90 × 45 × 90 in x, y and z direction, receptively, as shown in Fig. 4.10. For
droplets loaded on the substrate surface in this study, experimental measurements of
droplets contact angles showed that the standard deviation in the contact angle from an
58
average estimated value of 90º to be ± 20º, depending on the surface energy of the
substrate surface (i.e., hydrophobic nature of the substrate surface) .Thus, the droplet
was assumed to form a hemispherical shape (contact angle of 90º), and small deviations
from the actual three phase contact angle were ignored (see Fig. 4.10). The governing
equations of a SAW streaming; the continuity equation (4.2a), the momentum equation
(4.2b) and streaming force equation (4.7), were implemented and programmed in the
OpenFOAM-1.6 CFD code (OpenCFD LTD), which has been chosen as a basis for the
development of SAW streaming model (see Section 3.3.3). These equations were solved
over the entire droplet domain in three dimensions using a finite volume numerical
method (FVM) [129, 130]. A linear upwind differencing scheme [121] was used for the
discretization of the nonlinear convective term in Eq. (4.2b).
Figure 4.10 Computational curvilinear grid meshing of sessile droplet from side view
4.3.1.5
Measurement of SAW amplitude
The exact magnitude of the SAW amplitude at the entrance point, A, is required for
calculating the SAW streaming force and solving the Navier-Stokes equation.
Therefore, the numerically calculated relationship between time and streaming velocity
was used to correlate with the experimentally measured data, and then the SAW
amplitudes at different RF powers were estimated to have a good match of streaming
velocities from both experiments (see Figs. 4.11 and 4.12).
59
Figure 4.11 Streaming velocity at top centre of 30 µl droplet positioned symmetry
within a SAW propagation direction at f = 62 MHz (SAW device has an aperture of 2
mm); Solid lines represent numerical results at different RF powers; the markers denote
experimentally measured data.
Figure 4.12 shows the variation of the normalised wave amplitude by the wavelength of
a Rayleigh wave as a function of applied RF power to the SAW device. Both, the
current study results and the experimental measurements available in [1, 2], show that
the normalised wave amplitude exhibit similar values at different excitation frequencies.
The wave amplitude A, which is a parameter directly related to the RF power, is
illustrated in Fig. 4.12. The normalised SAW amplitude ⁄P was identified by the
following an empirical correlation that fits most of the results:
É
Ó. VÔ ×V
ÕÖ
Ã|.ccÔ q Ô ×V
ÕÖ
Ã|.Ó
4.8
where PD is the radio frequency (RF) power applied to the SAW device in Watts, and λ
is the SAW wavelength. This relationship was used to predict the exact value of the
wave amplitude in order to calculate the SAW streaming force. Among the range of the
RF power applied in this study (i.e., PD < 5 Vp-p), using this correlation showed that the
standard deviation in the wave amplitude from the extrapolated data are ≤ ± 8%. This is
the range of RF power in this study. This correlation was extended to a higher power
range that available in [1, 2] (i.e., PD ≥ 5 Vp-p) for further studies. In spite of the
60
increased deviation in the wave amplitude from the experimental measurements [1, 2],
the both results are generally in the same trends.
[2] at 30 MHz
[2] at 50 MHz
[1] at 50 MHz
Figure 4.12 Effect of driving RF power on the normalised SAW amplitude, A / λ at the
interaction point. From this study, a Numerical-Experimental correlation results were
presented, where a 30µl droplet positioned symmetry within SAW propagation on a
128º YX-LiNbO3 SAW device at 62 MHz. Along with the experimental measurements
of SAW amplitude available in the literature [1, 2]
4.4
4.4.1
Results and Discussions
Symmetric SAW streaming-mixing effect
Droplets with a volume of 30 µl were loaded on the central axis of the path taken by a
SAW propagating during this experiment, as depicted in Fig. 4.9(a). Figure 4.11
compares experimental and numerical results of streaming velocities at different RF
powers measured at the centre of the top surface of the droplet in the x direction, as
illustrated in Fig. 4.8. These results show that the streaming velocity approaches a
constant value within a time period less than 1 s, as the viscous resistance prevents any
further increase in flow velocity [56].
The velocities from experiments and the
simulations have similar values when the flow reaches a steady state, but these are less
similar during the starting period due to the complicated interaction between the
polystyrene solid particles and liquid. Figure 4.12 shows numerical results of the
normalised steady-state streaming velocity in the x direction, Uxn
61
=
Ux/Uxr, with the
corresponding normalized power Pn =PD / PDr, where Ux represents a streaming velocity
at the RF power PD, and Uxr represents reference streaming velocity at the reference
power PDr (the highest power in this series of experiments). In general, it can be
observed that the calculated and measured streaming velocities are in good agreement.
The error bars represent the standard deviation in streaming velocity from average
values measured during experiment.
Figure 4.13 Flow normalized streaming velocity as a function of normalised RF power
for a 30 µl droplet size using a 128º YX-LiNbO3 SAW device (IDT with 60 fingers).
Figure 4.14 shows the simulated streamlines of the SAW streaming with 3D circular
flow patterns for a 30 µl water droplet at an RF power of 15.89 mW. The simulation
results show that the highest value of streaming velocity is located at the interaction area
between the droplet and SAW because a higher momentum is delivered near the
substrate surface (SAW-droplet interaction area), where the source of SAW force is
more intense. This momentum source at the SAW-droplet interaction area establishes a
flow field that drives the flow with a Rayleigh angle, resulting in a continuous flow
within the droplet. Indeed, experimental observation using a high-speed camera
revealed that the particles inside the droplet started to move from the bottom to the
centre of the top surface of the droplet after SAW application, and this phenomenon of
flow development has been predicted by current model numerical simulation results
presented in Fig. 4.15.
62
(a)
(b)
Figure 4.14 Numerical 3D illustration showing the droplet SAW interaction leading to
3D complex flow patterns due to SAW energy attenuation and Reynolds stresses
formation which in turn produces an effective steady force acting in the fluid body (30
µl droplet at an RF power of 15.89 mW); (a) tilted view, (b) direct view focusing
through droplet centre
t=0.0s
t=0.05s
t=0.1s
t=0.2s
Figure 4.15 Numerical results showing the progress of flow field after applying the RF
power and SAW propagation (30 µl droplet at an RF power of 2.75 mW)
63
When the moving liquid reaches the droplet boundary, the interaction between the
liquid and the solid boundary induces a reverse flow at both sides of the droplet and the
bottom liquid-solid boundary. When this reverse flow goes back towards the IDTs, the
driving flow due to a SAW force drives the reverse flows upwards to the top of the
droplet. Eventually, the interaction between the reverse flow and the SAW driving flow
produces a double vortex flow pattern that reaches a steady state within a few seconds,
depending on the applied RF power, droplet size and fluid viscosity, as shown in Fig.
4.14. The interaction between the two flows contributes to a decrease in the streaming
velocity, especially at a high RF power (i.e., high wave amplitude), where the
progression flow is accelerated to a higher velocity and then decelerated to a steady
velocity afterwards as can be observed by the velocity profiles in Fig. 4.11. Figure
4.14(b) shows a streaming vortex centre line is generated inside the liquid droplet.
Figures 4.16(a) and (b) indicate that increasing the SAW force results in an increase of
the streaming velocity and a change in the position of the vortex central line. The same
phenomenon has been confirmed by experimental observations.
Figure 4.16 SAW numerical streaming patterns for 30 µl droplet at different SAW
forces. The streaming velocity increases from zero (sky blue) to higher velocity (light
red); (a) RF power of 2.75 mW; (b) RF power of 46.56 mW. The white stars indicate
the circulation centres
The streaming patterns obtained from solving the continuity equation, Eq. (4.2a) and the
Navier-Stokes equation, Eq. (4.2b) and those from the captured trajectory pictures of
6µl polystyrene particles were compared at the same SAW setup and droplet size.
Figure 4.17 shows good agreement has been obtained from different elevations. These
figures present comprehensive views of SAW streaming patterns within microdroplet64
positioned centre on the SAW propagation direction, and the driving flow and reverse
flow are clearly visible.
Figure 4.17 Comparison of experimental and numerical modeling for a 30 µl droplet
positioned at the centre with the SAW propagation direction; the upper row shows
pictures of particles trajectories; the bottom row shows the corresponding streaming
patterns from numerical simulations. The red arrow indicates the SAW propagation
direction.
4.4.2
Concentration of particles using asymmetric SAW streaming
It has been well documented that an acoustic radiation force can cause microparticles to
migrate towards the pressure nodes, or antinodes, depending on their mechanical
properties, and that particles can also be fractionised (according to their size and
density), and thus concentrated and/or separated within the liquid [68, 69, 131, 132]. A
simple method to concentrate the particles within a droplet is to use an asymmetric
distribution of SAW radiation along the width of the droplet as shown in Fig. 4.9(b),
and this has been well documented in [70]. Figure 4.18 shows the captured images of
the starch particle concentration process within a 30 µl droplet at an input RF power of
79.34 mW. The induced flow circulation in the droplet due to acoustic streaming rapidly
establishes a circulation pattern, and particles clustering near the droplet centre in the
form of conical shape as can be observed in Fig.4.18.
65
Figure 4.18 Captured video images illustrating the rapid concentration process for a
30µl water droplet with starch particles at an RF power of 79.43 mW, frequency 62
MHz and SAW width 2 mm; the first row shows a side view of the droplet, while the
second row shows a top view of the starch being concentrated. The yellow arrow
indicates the SAW propagation direction
Raghavan et al. [70] reported that the flow phenomenon within liquid droplets due to
the asymmetric positioning of SAW is similar to that obtained by the flow field between
stationary and rotating disks, which is known as Batchelor flow [133]. From the side
view of the movies, the fluid was observed to be pushed upward just above the SAW
propagation area which results in the primary azimuthal rotation within the droplet
periphery, where the same flow feature has been reported in [70]. This flow
phenomenon can be seen clearly in Fig. 4.19(a), which gives a numerical illustration of
three dimension velocity vectors on the droplet surface. Figure 4.19(b) depicts the
corresponding experimental snapshot of such flow phenomena. After applying the SAW
power, the starch particles are quickly follow the azimuthal fluid flow within the
droplet, which agree well with the numerical results presented in Fig. 4.19(a).
Therefore, the starch particles follow the flow field in a helical manner around the
surface periphery of the droplet to the upper position from the droplet bottom. The
numerical results show that the streaming velocity of the flow field at upper levels is
much higher than the lower one, as shown in Fig.4.20.
66
(a)
(b)
Figure 4.19 (a) Illustration of numerical result of streaming velocities for a 30 µl
droplet at the RF power of 24.39 mW; the vectors indicate the flow circulation direction
at the droplet surface. (b) Side view snapshot of a corresponding experiment shows
particles trajectories after SAW application, as indicated by the black arrow
Figure 4.20 Streaming velocity distributions across the centre of a 30 µl droplet at the
RF power of 46.56 mW. These curves represent numerical results along with x-axis as
depicted by the red line through the droplet centre for different heights from the
substrate surface (droplet-surface contact area)
67
During the experiment, it has been noted that particles were directed downwards, i.e.,
towards the substrate surface near the SAW interaction area, where they move closer to
the half rear of the droplet and are then forced upwards again when they reach the SAW
interaction area. Figures 4.19(a) and 4.20, shows the numerical simulation results for
the flow phenomenon, where the streaming velocities at the back side (e.g., away from
SAW source) of the droplet are smaller than the front (e.g., near the SAW) for a given
horizontal cross section. Velocity vectors in Fig. 4.19(a) shows how the flow is directed
down near the SAW propagation area before it is forced upward again along the droplet
periphery, which is in consistent with the experimental observations (see Fig. 4.20(b)).
The streaming velocity at the droplet bottom is zero due to surface friction, as shown in
Fig. 4.20. Consequently, the primary azimuthal rotation flow around the droplet
periphery produces a secondary bulk circulation flow [134-137], as illustrated in Figs.
4.21(a) and (b). This secondary circulation flow exists due to the net inward radial
velocity field close to the bottom of the droplet, which gives rise to a swirl like flow at
the bottom of the droplet. Therefore, the fluid close to the droplet bottom moves toward
the centre stagnation point and takes the starch particles along with it. This swirling
along the bottom of the droplet can be easily seen in Figs. 4.21(c) and (d). As a result of
mass conservation (continuity), the flow swirls back upward towards the top of the
droplet (secondary circulation flow), as illustrated in Fig. 4.21(b).
The experimental results show that starch particles are clustered closely to the SAW
propagation area, as shown in the rightmost panel of the second row in Fig. 4.18, and
this is attributed to a higher inward radial velocity on the right bottom side of the
droplet (opposite side to the SAW-droplet propagation area) than the left bottom side of
the droplet (the SAW-droplet propagation area). This is illustrated by the numerical
simulation results of radial velocity component in Fig. 4.22. The negative radial velocity
component in the left side of Fig. 4.22 represents inward radial velocity towards the
central stagnation point, while the positive radial velocity represents the outward
velocity (away from centre line). In the right-hand side, the positive velocity represents
inward velocity, while the negative one represents the outward velocity. Figure 4.22
shows that the radial inward velocity component near the bottom of the droplet is larger
than that in the upper regions, which explains the existence of a strong swirl motion at
the bottom of the droplet during the measurements, as depicted by the numerical results
in Fig. 4.21(d).
68
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Figure 4.21 Experimental and numerical illustrations of a secondary recirculation for a
10 µl water droplet ; (a) the captured video image during the concentration process of
starch particles at the RF power of 79.43 mW; (b) the corresponding numerical
streaming patterns focusing through the droplet volume; (c) streaming patterns
illustrates the column of secondary and the swirl motion; (d) a cross-sectional plan view
seen from the bottom of the droplet, which illustrates the swirling motion towards the
centre of rotation.
Figure 4.22 Radial streaming velocity components from numerical results at different
heights from the droplet bottom for a 30 µl droplet at an RF power of 79.43 mW.
69
Even though the flow swirls upward through a secondary circulation central column of
flow, the starch particles cluster at the centre of the column, in a conical shape, as
shown in Fig.4.18. Raghavan et al. [70] found that if the streaming velocity U is low
enough near the stagnation area, the particles will be concentrated near the stagnation
area due to the sedimentation force. Numerical results in Fig. 4.20 clearly show that the
streaming velocity near the stagnation point at substrate surface is smaller than in other
regions. However, the experimental measurement also shows that the tip height of the
clustered starch particles is ~ 850 µm in the case of 79.43 mW RF power. The
numerical simulation results for the equivalent RF power case showed that the tip height
corresponds to the numerical height in which the radial velocity becomes zero near the
droplet centre, as depicted in Fig. 4.22, at cross sectional height 800 µm.
The required time for the particles to accumulate in a conical shape has been recorded
for different RF powers. In this study, the concentration time is defined as the time
needed for the clustered particles to accumulate and form the final steady state (i.e.,
when the area Ac occupied by the clustered particles on the substrate surface changes
by less than 5 % in 30 s duration) conical shape starting from the initial application of
the RF power. Figure 4.23 shows the effect of the RF power on the starch particle
concentration time within the water droplets for a moderate range of droplet sizes. This
shows that the concentration time decreases with increasing RF power, which is
attributed to the increase in the inward radial velocity (Ur), near the bottom of the
droplets. This results in a stronger swirl motion near the bottom of the droplet, which
collects the particles within the droplet. Figure 4.24 shows results from numerical
simulations of the radial streaming velocities 200 µm above the bottom of a 30 µl
droplet for different RF powers. The figure clearly shows that radial streaming velocity
increases with increasing the RF power; a factor which directly influences the wave
amplitude (A). Above a certain RF power, the central streaming velocities are so high
that the particles cease to be concentrated and flow away with streams towards the
droplet top through the central column, as depicted in Fig. 4.21(a).
70
Figure 4.23 Effect of RF power and droplet size on the particle concentration time
(time for particle accumulation to change from its initial to the final steady state for
moderate range of droplet size)
Figure 4.24 Radial streaming velocities from numerical results at 200 µm height from
the droplet bottom for 30 µl droplet at different RF powers
To investigate the effect of a droplet’s asymmetric position in the SAW propagation
direction, numerical simulations have been carried out at different SAW interaction
angles, as indicated by the droplet illustration in Fig. 4.24. The results show that the
71
suitable interaction angles of SAW with the liquid droplet should be in the range 22.5º≤
Ө ≤ 90º, in order to achieve larger inward radial velocity and shorter concentration
times. For interaction angles >110º, the circulation flow pattern becomes a double
vortex circulation pattern, similar to that shown in Fig. 4.16, and the range 90 º ≤ Ө ≤
110 º could be named as transition zone between circulation flow pattern and double
vortex flow pattern. Therefore, the concentration effect is dependent on a SAW input
power as well as the droplet position.
The simulation and experimental results show that there is a range of RF power within
which the concentration of starch particles can be achieved, as shown in Fig. 4.25. This
can be described by four regions according to the RF power and concentration time. The
lower region in Fig. 4.25 (zone 1) represents the region within which there is no bulk
circulation for the flow field. The SAW force is not zero, but it is balanced by the
pressure term in Eq. (4.2b), which represents hydrostatic solution [55, 56]. The adjacent
zone to the particle concentration curve (zone2) represents the region within which a
weak bulk circulation occurs, but it is not large enough to drive the particles towards the
circulation centre. The lower threshold RF power for the particles to be concentrated
lies directly above the upper limit of zone 2. Thus, for particle concentration, an
efficient inward radial velocity must be obtained, and that can be achieved within zone
3.
The concentration is enhanced with increasing applied RF power up to a critical
value (the upper limit of zone3). Above this the redispersion of the particles becomes
dominant (zone 4). This is attributed to the increase in the streaming velocity near the
stagnation point which in turn starts to overcome the sedimentation force and drives the
particles away from the concentration cone through the central column as illustrated in
Figs. 4.21(a) and (b). The droplet size as well as the magnitude of the RF power sets
the upper limit threshold (i.e., the highest power that can be applied to achieve the
particle process), as can be observed in Fig. 4.23. This value can be seen to increase
with larger droplet sizes, which is due to lower streaming velocities for bigger droplets
at the same RF power, i.e., higher power is required for larger droplets to achieve the
same concentration time. In a similar manner to the concentration upper threshold RF
power, the lower threshold RF power is also affected by the droplet size.
Figure 4.26 show the area concentration ratio Ac / At (i.e., the ratio between the clustered
starch area Ac and the droplet substrate contact area At
viewed from the top) as a
function of the RF power and droplet size. Lower ratios are obtained at higher RF
72
power, which is attributed to the corresponding increase in streaming velocity. This in
turn produces higher inward radial velocity that drives more particles towards the
stagnation point and results in a smaller concentration area. Streaming with low inward
radial velocities (weak swirl motion) results in larger concentration area, and low
concentration ratios.
Figure 4.25 Experimental time-RF power concentration curve for a 30 µl droplet size in
asymmetric position with a SAW device at 62 MHz.
Figure 4.26 The area concentration ratio A c/ At (the ratio between the concentrated
starch area Ac and the whole droplet area At viewed from top) as a function of the
droplet size and RF power
73
4.5
Summary
In this chapter surface acoustic waves generated by 128o YX- black LiNbO3 SAW
devices have been characterised for microfluidic mixing and concentrating particles,
and a 3D numerical model of SAW acoustic streaming in microfluidic applications has
been developed.
A SAW acoustic streaming model has been calibrated using
experimental results, which predicted the SAW streaming phenomena for different
experimental setups. The concentration of suspended particles within a droplet can be
obtained when the droplet is located asymmetrically on the SAW propagation direction.
The applied RF power, droplet size and droplet position have been identified as factors
affecting the concentration process, with the concentration rate being enhanced with
increased applied RF power until a critical value is reached above which the dispersion
of the particles becomes dominant. The magnitude of the critical values is also
influenced by the droplet size. The 3D model which has been developed captures the
physics behind the mechanism of suspended particles concentration by placing the
SAW-driven microdroplet in an asymmetric position.
74
Chapter 5
ACOUSTIC STREAMING AND HYDRODYNAMIC
NONLINEARITY
Since the numerical model of a SAW-induced streaming field was developed using the
full nonlinear Navier-Stokes equation (i.e., Eq. (4.2b)), and its results were verified and
compared with the corresponding experimental data, where good agreement between
the two results is obtained (discussed in Chapter 4). This chapter investigates the effect
of hydrodynamic nonlinearity on the development of acoustic streaming induced by a
Rayleigh SAW, and discusses its significance on the generation of a streaming field,
using both the experiments and 3D computations.
5.1
Introduction
As introduced in Chapter 4 (Sect. 4.1), many studies have been done to provide
numerical solutions for the SAW-driven microfluidics, most studies of the SAW-driven
fluids used the acoustic body force approach based on the Stokes model of Nyborg’s
theory [54]. For instance, Franke et al. [93] reported that the nonlinearity (inertial)
effects arising from a SAW propagation in a fluid medium were nearly negligible and
the Stokes model, i.e., Eq. (3.4) is applicable, due to the small geometries of droplets.
However, only a few studies have been reported on the effects of hydrodynamics
nonlinearity in acoustic streaming [74, 138, 139], and even these studies were limited to
ultrasonic standing waves, rather than SAW. For example, Lighthill [55, 56] discussed
the effects of hydrodynamic nonlinearity on acoustic streaming of standing wave
generated by a cylindrical resonator in an unbounded fluid medium, and concluded that
the nonlinearity effects of fluid inertia were significant in all noticeable acoustic
streaming examples. Nevertheless, the nonlinear term of flow inertia in the SAW
studies was normally ignored [104], even for very high SAW powers up to 6×104 µW
[46, 48, 103, 123]. To the best of author’s knowledge, in this chapter, a systematic
experimental and numerical investigation concerning the effects of the hydrodynamic
nonlinearity on the SAW-driven fluids is presented for the first time.
75
5.2
5.2.1
Methods
Experimental
The IDT of a SAW device used in this investigation has a wavelength of λ = 64 µm and
a fundamental frequency f ≈ 60 MHz. Water droplets (1-30 µl) were loaded
symmetrically with the SAW propagation path (see Fig. 4.7 (a)), using a micropipette.
For the measurements of the streaming velocities, the same experimental setup
presented in Chapter 4 was used (see Section 4.2.2).
5.2.2
Modeling Details
The induced flow streaming in the liquid droplet was assumed to be governed by the
continuity and laminar incompressible 3D Navier-Stokes equations, i.e., Eqs. 4.2(a) and
(b), respectively that driven by an external acoustic body force [122]. The numerical
method and boundary conditions used in this study was presented in Sect. 4.3.1.4.
In this numerical analysis, RF powers were applied in range of PD ≤ 16 mW, to keep the
droplet in its original shape without inducing significant distortion. Consequently,
stress-free boundary conditions can be applied at the droplet/air interface.
The
preliminary results and calibration of our code have been reported in Chapter 4. Only
for the analysis of linearised hydrodynamic model, the nonlinear term, LM < · Â < in
Eq. 4.2(b) was ignored, which gives a transient version of the Stokes model, Eq. (3.4).
In this study, all the numerical cases were run to a steady state, and these results are
discussed in the following sections.
5.3
5.3.1
Results and Discussions
Dimensionless parameters
The main parameters that govern the system of SAW-driven droplets are those of the
flow field of the droplet hydrodynamics, and those of the sound field that generates
either a flow inside the droplets or distortion of droplets shape. The hydrodynamics
parameters include the streaming velocity < (m/s), the fluid viscosity × (m2/s), and the
droplet radius 45 (m), as characterised by the Reynolds number Re <45 ⁄× . Another
parameter is the surface tension R (N/m), a force that plays significant role against the
SAW force to retain the original shape of the droplet. The characteristic parameters of
the sound field; are the SAW wave amplitude (m), Eq. (4.8), the SAW wavelength,
76
P (m) that measures the propagation depth of SAW into the droplet fluid [53]. These
two parameters are involved in Eq. (4.7) of the acoustic body force (N/m3).
In this study, it has been found from both the experimental and numerical simulation
results, that the driving SAW characteristics can be described by a dimensionless
parameter of normalised acoustic force ÚÛ , as defined by:
Z[\
Z
«⁄Y
5.1
The proposed parameter of ÚÛ represents the ratio of the acoustic force (e.g., measured
at a point where the SAW enters the droplet) per unit area, Fλ, to the surface tension per
unit length, σ / Rd. The new dimensionless parameter of the ÚÛ proposed in this study
can be used to describe not only the characteristics of the acoustic wave field, but also
the hydrodynamics of the SAW-driven droplets including the deformation mechanism.
These two dimensionless parameters, i.e., ÚÛ and Re, are used in the analysis and
discussion of hydrodynamics of droplets induced by a Rayleigh SAW in this chapter.
5.3.2
5.3.2.1
Influences of fluid inertia on streaming phenomena
Reynolds number
Effects of hydrodynamic nonlinearity on the streaming phenomenon are discussed in
terms of the steady-state Re of an induced internal flow dynamics by a SAW-droplet
coupling, using a moderate range of the normalized acoustic force, ÚÛ (i.e., Eq. (5.1)),
as shown in Fig. 5.1. As can be seen in Figs. 5.1(a) and (b) by the relationship between
the Reynolds number and ÚÛ parameter in log-log scale, when ÚÛ Ü 0.002 (PD ≤ 1
µW), the results from the Stokes model, Eq. (3.4), and the full N-S model, Eq. (4.2b)
give very good agreement in comparison with experimental measurements. This is
Þß
based on an error analysis using defined deviation of J Ý1 x Þß à Ý Ü 5.0x10-2, where
áà
Rel and Renl are the Reynolds number of linearised and non-linearized cases,
respectively.
This means that the linearization assumption is valid only for the
simulation of acoustic streaming at very low SAW powers of the microwatts range. This
validation can also be identified by the associated Reynolds number with Re < 1, if and
only if, the droplets size is small enough, such as for the droplet volumes of 1.0 or 2.5
µl used in this study, as illustrated in Figs. 5.1(a) and (b) respectively. It should be
77
noted that the condition of Re < 1 that has been imposed in most studies of employing
the linear assumption [104], is not applicable for larger droplet volumes, such as 5 or 10
µl in this study.
100
Re
10
1
1µl-Expt.
1µl-Nonlin-Num.
1µl-Lin- Num.
0.1
10µl-Expt.
10µl-Nonlin-Num.
10µl-Lin-Num.
0.01
0.0004
0.004
FNA
0.04
0.4
(a)
100
Re
10
2.5µl-Expt.
2.5µl-Nonlin-Num.
2.5µl-Lin- Num.
5µl-Expt.
5µl-Nonlin-Num.
5µl-Lin-Num.
1
0.1
0.01
0.0004
0.004
0.04
0.4
FNA
(b)
Figure 5.1 Effects of hydrodynamic nonlinearity in the relationship between the steady
state Reynolds numbers, Re and FNA, using 128º YX-LiNbO3 SAW device with 0.5 mm
aperture excited by a frequency of 60.4 MHz; (a) results for 1 and 10 µl droplets; and
(b) results for 2.5 and 5 µl droplets. Solid and broken lines represent the nonlinear and
linear numerical results, respectively. The markers denote the experimental data
78
The results in Fig. 5.1 show that the flow inertia does appear, and becomes negligible
only at a condition of Re <<1. However, when the SAW power increases, ÚÛ â 0.01
(or PD ≥ 20 µW), the difference between the Stokes model results and the experimental
data becomes significant, and can be as high as 90%, especially for the larger droplets.
Meanwhile, this difference is only about 10% for the N-S model, as shown in Figs.
5.1(a) and (b). This closer agreement of the N-S model results with experimental data is
due to the contribution of flow inertia, where the increase in the ÚÛ (or SAW power)
enhances the role of the hydrodynamic nonlinearity term in the nonlinear N-S model, in
Eq. 4.2(b); which becomes too large to be ignored.
Additionally, in the nonlinear region, it is clearly visible from the experimental and the
nonlinear N-S modeling results in Figs. 5.1(a) and (b) that the differences in the value of
Re for the two droplets sizes decrease gradually with an increase of the acoustic power,
and becomes considerably smaller as long as ÚÛ > 0.05. In contrast, the Stokes model
results show a fixed difference in the value of Re with variation in the drops volumes
for the whole range of ÚÛ values, a situation not confirmed by the experimental data.
5.3.2.2
Flow development and streaming velocity
In order to identify the role of the nonlinear term in SAW acoustic streaming, the
transient streaming velocities of the N-S model presented in Fig. 4.11 for a 30 µl
droplet, and those of the Stokes model were examined in Fig. 5.2(a) by comparing both
simulation and experimental results. Results show that the droplet internal flow has
been accelerated quickly to a steady velocity within one second, with higher ÚÛ of a
0.419. Increasing of ÚÛ (or RF power) reduces this initial time due to the increase in
the SAW momentum delivered to the fluid. As shown in Fig. 5.2(a), the values of
streaming velocities from the nonlinear N-S model are in good agreement with the
experimental data. On the other hand, the Stokes model results are one order of
magnitude less than those from experiments. Furthermore, the discrepancy between the
steady state experimental and numerical results for ÚÛ of 0.248 is 87.4%, and becomes
92.5% for ÚÛ of 0.419, when flow inertia (hydrodynamic nonlinearity) is ignored.
Conversely this discrepancy is only 0.47% and 1.37%, respectively, when the
hydrodynamics nonlinearity is taken into account. Also, at a steady state stage, the
deviation of the velocity for the two power cases is ~16 mm/s, both from the
experimental and nonlinear numerical results using the N-S model, compared with only
~0.846 mm/s in the linear case, i.e., using Stokes model.
79
Streaming velocity U (m/s)
30µl
0.03
0.025
0.02
0.015
FNA= 0.419
0.01
0.005
FNA= 0.248
0
0
0.5
1
Time (s)
1.5
2
(a)
(b)
Figure 5.2 Hydrodynamic nonlinearity effects on; (a) the transient streaming velocity of
a 30 µl droplet measured at point B, using 128º YX-LiNbO3 SAW device with 62 MHz
frequency, 2 mm aperture at different Z[\ ; (b) the streaming velocity as a function of
Z[\ for a 10 µl droplet using a 0.5 mm aperture SAW device driven at 60.4 MHz.
Solid and broken lines represent the nonlinear and linear numerical results, respectively.
The markers are the experimental measurements
Figure 5.2(b) shows both experimental and simulations results of the streaming velocity
as a function of FNA for a 10 µl droplet at three observation points; i.e., point A is close
to the SAW source, point B at the top centre of the droplet, and point C far away from
80
the SAW source. However, due to the difficulties and challenges with capturing the
flow field near the SAW source during the experiments, only the numerical results are
presented for point A. It can be observed once again that the importance of the fluidhydrodynamics nonlinearity becomes more significant with the increase of the SAW
power, due to the increase of the streaming velocity, where the inertial forces become
dominant. The linear approximation using the Stokes model results in a higher
streaming velocity near the SAW source (point A) and a much lower reading at regions
away from the SAW source ( B and C).
The role of the nonlinear term on the droplet-acoustic streaming can be further
illustrated by taking the case of a 20 µl droplet and examining the velocity distribution
in three dimensions. The velocity distribution was measured along two axes through the
droplet, i.e., the vertical y axis shown in Fig. 5.3(a), and the horizontal z axis at a height
of 1200 µm from the bottom of the droplet shown in Fig. 5.3(b). Figure 5.3(a) shows
that at an early stage (i.e., t = 0.1 s), both the nonlinear and linear approximations have
similar velocity profiles. However, as the flow develops, the differences between the
two profiles become significant. This is also true for the velocity profiles along the
horizontal z axis, as can be observed in Fig. 5.3(b). Fig. 5.3(a) shows that the value of
the steady-state streaming velocity using the Stokes model is less than that using the NS model by about 93% at the top of droplet, and about 60% less at the centre of the
droplet, as shown in Fig. 5.3(b). These results clearly show the consequences of
ignoring the hydrodynamic nonlinearity of flow inertia in the predictions of SAW
acoustic streaming, from both qualitative and quantitative points of view.
5.3.2.3
Flow patterns of acoustic streaming
For qualitative illustration, the simulated flow patterns inside the droplet from the two
models are presented in Fig. 5.4, i.e., the Stokes and the N-S model. The top row in Fig.
5.4 shows that the butterfly flow pattern rotates around one elliptical axis of rotation
through the droplet centre when the N-S model is applied, which have been verified by
experimental observations [62, 140]. In contrast, when the Stokes model is used for the
simulations, the flow pattern only rotates around the double vertical axis with two small
vortices near the SAW source, as shown in the lower row in Fig. 5.4, which does not
agree with the experimental observations.
81
(a)
(b)
Figure 5.3 Simulated streaming velocity profiles for a 20 µl droplet, using SAW device
with 2.5 mm aperture, 62 MHz frequency and Z[\ of 0.366; (a) along the y axis ;(b)
along the z axis at a 1,200 µm height from the droplet bottom. Solid and broken lines
represent the nonlinear and linear cases, respectively
82
The precise identification of the acoustic streaming patterns is required when designing
efficient Lab-on-Chip SAW-mixing devices with a minimal applied RF power. For
instance, applying the Stokes model (ignoring the non-linear term) to model SAWmixing of bio-particles inside a relatively larger droplets (such as 20 µl simulated in this
study) will predict that a very large power is needed to get the uniform butterfly flow
pattern with efficient flow rotation, as shown in the first row of Fig. 5.4. Such a large
recommended power is not necessary as evidenced by experiments carried out from this
paper. It is also well-known that the application of high acoustic powers would cause
significant acoustic heating effects, which would be detrimental to the biosensing
process or could potentially destroy temperature sensitive biological samples [141,
142].
Figure 5.4 Simulated streaming patterns for 20 µl droplet, using SAW device with 2.5
mm aperture, 62 MHz frequency and Z[\ of 0.366. The upper and lower row represents
the nonlinear and linear cases, respectively. Broken lines represents axis of rotation
5.3.3
Droplet Deformation
Additionally, it is demonstrated here that the new ÚÛ parameter can also be employed
to identify the induced droplets deformation by SAW. The detailed experimental
measurements of the droplet height ratio h / h0 as a function of the ÚÛ , seen in Fig. 5.5,
show that the droplet deformation with a significant change in its height h from initial
height h0 can be clearly predicted at ÚÛ > 0.45. Although the detailed mechanism of
SAW-induced droplet deformation is beyond the scope of this study, the author would
like to give a brief explanation. As it has been suggested earlier, the acoustic power
emitted by the SAW into the droplets is dominated by the balance between the SAW
acoustic force and surface tension force, as characterized by the values of the ÚÛ .
83
When the FNA > 0.45, SAW-droplet
SAW droplet coupling induces hydrodynamic forces and pressure
[105, 143],, which cannot be balanced by surface tension, and thus results in droplet
distortion into an asymmetrical shape, as shown in Fig. 5.5.
1.03
1.025
h/h0
1.02
1.015
1.0 µl
2.5 µl
5.0 µl
10 µl
30 µl
1.01
1.005
1
0.0
0.1
1.0
10.0
FNA
Figure 5.5 Normalized droplet height as a function of the normalized
normaliz driving force
(FNA), for different
rent droplet volumes, using 128º
128 YX-LiNbO3 SAW devices with 0.5 mm
aperture excited by a frequency of 60.4 MHz;
MHz; dashed line stands for trendline
5.4
Summary
In summary,, by introducing a new dimensionless acoustic force parameter FNA in the
current analysis for the SAW-induced
SAW induced acoustic streaming inside the droplets (1-30
(1
µl),
this study was able for the first time to present qualitative and quantitative comparisons
between the experimental data and numerical simulation results.
results. This provides strong
evidence of the existence of significant hydrodynamics nonlinearity in this system, over
a range of the values of FNA. Therefore, the flow within droplets has been classified into
three flow regimes or modes: (1) viscous dominant
dominan mode, when the FNA ≤ 0.002, where
the widely reported Stokes model of Nyborg’s theory [54] is applicable; (2) inertia
dominant mode, when the FNA ≥ 0.01, where the full 3D N-S
S equations must be applied
in order not to cause large error in streaming velocity predictions, which could be as
large as ~93% ; (3) droplet deformation or movement mode, with a threshold FNA ≈
0.45, above which the droplet deforms. In brief, it is demonstrated that the
hydrodynamic nonlinearity plays a significant role in most noticeable SAW acoustic
streaming of droplets
roplets actuation (e.g.,
(e.g. Re ≥1).
84
Chapter 6
INFLUENCES OF CONFIGURATION PARAMETERS ON
STREAMING PHENOMENON
This chapter reports the numerical simulation and experimental characterisation of 3D
acoustic streaming behavior of a liquid droplet subjected to a Rayleigh surface acoustic
wave. The streaming behavior into the droplet was studied in depth as a function of
radio-frequency (RF) power, aperture of the interdigitated transducer, and the volume of
the liquid droplet.
6.1
Introduction
As explained in Chapter 3, if a liquid droplet lies in the path of a SAW, the wave creates
a significant acoustic streaming in the liquid that facilitates mixing, stirring, vibrating,
pumping, ejection and atomization [81, 144-148]. However, to the best of the author’s
knowledge, few studies have reported the variations of the 3D SAW streaming patterns
within the liquid droplets as a function of the RF powers, droplet sizes and SAW
aperture widths as well as their effects on flow velocity, liquid agitation and mixing
efficiency [70, 148]. Understanding the influence of these parameters on the flow
streaming will allow for efficient design and control of SAW mixing/pumping for
microfluidic applications. This chapter provides a systematic analysis of the SAW
streaming in a microdroplet based on both experimental characterisation and 3D
numerical simulation of the hydrodynamic flow patterns within the droplet.
6.2
Experimental
The experimental setup and measurement methods applied in this study were presented
in Chapter 4 (i.e., Sec. 4.2). The RF power applied to the IDTs was only restricted to
inducing acoustic streaming within the liquid droplets by ensuring that neither droplet
deformation nor movement was induced.
6.3
Modeling Details
As indicated in Chapter 2, an OpenFOAM-1.6 CFD code (OpenCFD Ltd) was used for
the development of the SAW liquid coupling model [140]. The governing equations of
85
the streaming model, computational techniques and the boundary conditions were
presented in Chapter 4 (i.e., Sec. 4.3).
6.4
6.4.1
Results and Discussions
Acoustic streaming vs. power
With a 30 µl water droplet loaded symmetrically on the SAW propagation path, the
SAW-fluid coupling provides a source of momentum at the SAW-droplet interaction
area that drives the fluid with a Rayleigh angle, resulting in a continuous flow within
the droplet. When the moving liquid reaches the droplet boundary, the interaction
between the liquid and solid boundary induces a reverse flow on both sides of the
droplet and the bottom liquid-solid boundary as shown in Figs. 6.1(a)-(f). When this
reverse flow goes back towards the IDTs, the flow due to the SAW force drives the
reverse flows upwards to the top of the droplet, as can be observed in Figs. 6.1(g) and
(h). Eventually, the interaction between the reverse flow and the SAW driving flow
produces a double vortex (butterfly) flow pattern as shown in Fig. 6.1. The vortex
reaches a steady state within seconds, depending on the applied RF power, droplet size
and fluid viscosity.
The usage of a high speed camera for the creation of Figs. 6.1(a)-(g) has provided a
thorough understanding of the 3D liquid streaming patterns inside the liquid droplet,
which is difficult to observe with the naked eye, even from different angles. There is a
clear vortex central line (axis of rotation), where the flow velocity is minimal, as can be
observed in Fig. 6.1(f). Figure 6.2 presents the simulation results of a range RF powers
(0.5 to ~16 mW) for a 30 µl droplet using a 2 mm wide IDT, and it can be observed that
increasing power modifies the position of the axis of rotation. The location of the
central axis of rotation at the droplet surface and its path through the droplet centre
(centre line) have been tracked and characterised, as illustrated in Fig. 6.2. The path and
position of this central line and the distances between the double vortices will indicate
the shear velocity gradients and nature of the streaming patterns, thus showing the
mixing efficiency. Hence these positions and the streaming velocity have been
measured in the next sections as functions of RF power, SAW aperture and droplet
volumes.
86
Figure 6.1 SAW streaming patterns for a 30 µl droplet from top (a) and (b), side (c) and
(d), front (e) and (f), and back view (g) and (h) using a 128º YX-LiNbO3 SAW device
(60 IDT fingers, 2 mm aperture and 50 mW RF power). The left column photos of 6 µm
polystyrene particles trajectories, while the right column represents the corresponding
simulated streaming patterns. The red arrow in the first row indicates to the SAW
propagation direction
87
Figure 6.2 Numerical results showing the changes in the position of the axis of
rotation with the increase in the RF power for a 30 µl droplet using 2 mm wide IDT.
The upper row focuses on the droplet top surface, where the centre of the double vortex
can be easily seen; the lower row shows the side view focusing through the droplet
centre (middle position with the droplet volume), where the position of the axis of
rotation at the middle of the droplet volume is clearly indicated. The parameters Lx and
Lz indicate to the positions of the centre of double vortex, while dx and dy indicate the
positions of the central axis of rotation through the droplet centre
Figure 6.3 presents the changes in the positions of the central axis as a function of
different RF powers, derived using the simulation results shown in Fig. 6.2. As the RF
power increases, the double vortices at the droplet top surface move towards the front of
the droplet. This movement can be attributed to an increase in the momentum delivered
to the fluid, as identified by the parameter Lx in Figs. 6.2 and 6.3. As the centres of the
double vortices move forward, the distance between the double vortices, Lz, is also
increases in a similar manner to Lx. It can be observed that the central line positions
into the droplet centre, dx and dy, did not change significantly with increasing the RF
power up to a critical value of RF power. The range within which a weak bulk
circulation occurs near the SAW fluid interaction area (e.g., near the IDT), as shown in
the first column of Fig. 6.2. However, a further increase in the RF power provides a
SAW force that is large enough to overcome the high viscous resistance of the bulk
liquid and move the centre of rotation further towards the droplet front. Figure 6.3
shows that the central axis of rotation is pushed towards the droplet front, as can be
observed in the second row of Fig. 6.2. The same phenomenon has also been observed
in the values of Lx and Lz, but this is not strong as the parameters dx and dy, perhaps
88
due to the restricted space within the 3D shape of the droplet and its outer surface as the
double vortex movement is restricted by the droplet outer surface.
Figure 6.3 Numerical results representing the changes in the parameters of the central
axis of rotation with the RF power for a 30 µl droplet using 2 mm IDT width and
excitation frequency of 60 MHz.
Figure 6.4 presents the vector field distribution of the streaming velocity through the
centre of a 30 µl droplet as a function of the RF power, which directly affects the wave
amplitude, as presented by Eq. (4.8). Negative values of the velocity represent
backward streaming towards the SAW device. Figure 6.4 clearly reveals that the
streaming velocities near the droplet bottom are smaller than those in the upper regions,
near the droplet surface, due to the surface friction at the substrate surface where the
SAW is attenuated (e.g., away from the interaction point). A lower velocity is also
observed near the centre of circulation, as can be observed in Figs. 6.1(c)-(d), and 6.4.
Figure 6.4 also shows that the streaming velocity increases with the RF power (e.g.,
SAW amplitude) as a result of increased momentum force delivered to the fluid within
the SAW-droplet interaction area.
89
Figure 6.4 Simulated vector field streaming velocity distribution for a 30 µl at its centre
along with the y axis depicted by the solid red line through the droplet centre. Different
RF powers (e.g., SAW amplitudes) have been computed for the 128o YX- black LiNbO3
SAW device with 60 MHz with 60 pairs of IDTs and a 2 mm SAW aperture.
6.4.2
Streaming vs. SAW aperture
Figure 6.5 shows the butterfly-shape streaming patterns and the location of the axis of
rotation for a 30 µl droplet for a range of different SAW apertures and an RF power of
15.85 mW. It can be observed these do not show a dramatic change in the streaming
patterns for the different SAW apertures. The detailed results in Figs. 6.5 and 6.6 show
that the previously defined axis of rotation parameters, Lx, Lz, dx and dy increase
slightly with the IDT aperture up to a critical value, above which they decrease. This
critical value of the IDT aperture is estimated to be about half of the droplet radius.
Figure 6.5 also shows that the curvature of the central axis of rotation reduces as the RF
power is increased.
90
Figure 6.5 Numerical results showing the changes in the axis of rotation position for a
30 µl droplet excited by different IDT apertures with an RF power of 15.85 mW. The
first row shows a top view of the double vorticity; the second row shows the side view
focusing through the droplet centre, and the third row views the droplet centre from the
front. The yellow arrow in the first row indicates the SAW direction and the dot red line
represents the axis of rotation
Figure 6.6 Numerical results presenting the axis of rotation parameters as a function of
the IDTs aperture value for a 30 µl droplet with 15.85 mW and 60 MHz excitation
frequency
91
Experiments have also been performed to investigate the effects of the width of the
SAW aperture on the streaming velocities for a range of SAW apertures and droplet
sizes. Figure 6.7 shows that increasing the SAW aperture results in a higher streaming
velocity until a critical SAW aperture size is reached, which is also dependent on the
droplet size. The simulation results show a similar trend to those observed
experimentally. In general, both results are in good agreement with slight deviation at
higher powers; this is attributed to the inaccuracy in capturing the fast speed of the
polystyrene particles at high RF powers.
Figure 6.7 Comparison of experimental and numerical results of the x-component
streaming velocity measured at the top centre of the droplets at different RF powers
using a 128º YX-LiNbO3 SAW device with a range of SAW apertures (60 MHz and
pairs of IDTs with 30 fingers) for 2.5, and 5 µl droplet sizes
The experimental results presented in Fig. 6.7 show measurements at the top centre of
the microdroplets. Although it would be possible to make further measurements in other
positions, 3D SAW streaming patterns and detailed streaming velocities at any point for
the whole droplets at the different SAW apertures can be more readily obtained using
simulation.
Figures 6.8(a)-(c) show the simulated velocity distribution in a 30 µl
droplet for different sections through the droplet domain for a range of the SAW
apertures. This shows the streaming velocity is enhanced as the SAW aperture increases
up to a peak value (see Fig. 6.7), above which the streaming velocity decreases. This
can be attributed to an increase in the radial component of the streaming velocity Uz,
92
near the SAW source, as shown in Fig. 6.8(d). The positive values of Uz in the left hand
side of Fig. 6.8(d) indicates the inward radial velocity towards the droplet centre,
whereas on the right hand side, the negative values indicate an inward radial velocity
towards the droplet centre. The increase in Uz on both sides of the droplet results in a
decrease in the streaming velocity near the SAW source as can be observed in
Fig. 6.8(a). Thus, the momentum delivered to drive the fluid upward is decreased,
which explains the trends shown in Figs. 6.5-6.7. However, these critical values of the
SAW aperture for the change in streaming velocities are also affected by the droplet size
as indicated by the experimental and numerical results presented in Fig. 6.7. Both the
experimental and numerical results show that the maximum streaming/mixing velocity
is achieved when the ratio of SAW aperture to droplet radius, D)* ⁄45 is about 0.5.
(a)
93
(b)
(c)
94
(d)
Figure 6.8 Numerical simulations of the streaming velocity as a function of SAW
apertures for a 30 µl droplet excited using 12.59 mW RF; (a) and (b) scalar values of
streaming velocity measured at a height of 1,000 µm from the droplet bottom in the
SAW direction and droplet diameter as indicated by the solid red line in the droplet
illustrations; (c) scalar values of streaming velocity measured at the droplet centre
through its height; (d) vector values of radial streaming velocity components measured
at 1,000 µm height from the droplet bottom and 800 µm from the SAW-droplet
interaction area as depicted by the red line through the droplet illustration
6.4.3
Streaming patterns vs. droplet volume
Figure 6.9 shows the 3D streaming patterns for a range of droplet sizes with a fixed RF
power of 15.85 mW and a SAW aperture of 0.5 mm. The butterfly streaming pattern
does not change much with volume, and the elliptical shape of the central axis of
rotation remains nearly constant for all droplet volumes, as can be observed from the
dotted lines in Fig. 6.9. However, the detailed measurements of the parameters defining
the location of the axis of rotation in Fig. 6.10 show some dramatic increases as the
droplet’s volume is increased, which is predictable. Figure 6.11 also shows the changes
of the central line parameter ratio as a function of droplet radius. The results indicate
that the central-line parameters through the droplet centre, (dx/Rd) and (dy/Rd) are
nearly constant ~ 1.15 and 0.52, respectively. Figure 6.11 shows slight differences of
less than 12% and 10% for the central line parameter ratios (Lx/Rd) and (Lz/Rd),
95
respectively, as the size of the droplet changes. Therefore, the central line parameters
ratios can be reasonably assumed constant over a moderate range of droplet volumes.
Figure 6.9 Numerical results showing the changes in the centre line (axis of rotation)
position for different droplets sizes at RF power 15.85 mW. The first row represents the
two vortices as seen from the top; the second represents the side view through the
droplet centre; the third represents the droplet centre from droplet front (away from the
IDTs); the fourth focuses into the droplet centre as seen at the back of the droplet (near
the IDTs). The yellow arrow in the first row indicates to the SAW direction and the dot
red line represents the central line of circulation.
96
Figure 6.10 Numerical results represent the changes in the parameters of the axis of
rotation with the droplet volume using 0.5 mm IDT width and 15.85 mW RF power
Figure 6.11 Dimensionless numerical values of the axis of rotation position as a
function the droplet volume for a 0.5 mm IDT width and 15.85 mW RF power
97
6.5
Summary
Experimental and numerical studies of SAW acoustic streaming within a microdroplet
have been conducted to investigate the effects of parameters such as droplet size, RF
power, and SAW aperture. It has been shown that a higher RF power and a decreased
droplet size result in an increase in the SAW streaming velocity. The spatial position of
the central-line of rotation (axis of rotation) is directly affected by the droplet volume,
RF power and the SAW device aperture. The dimensionless parameter values of the
central line position as a function of droplet volume remain nearly constant with a
percentage increment of not more than 12% at the droplet surface and 10% through the
centre as the droplet volume increases. The SAW aperture has been identified as the
main factor influencing the mixing (streaming) velocities, which increase with the SAW
aperture up to a critical value, above which a decrease in velocity is observed. The
magnitude of the velocity is determined by the droplet size with a maximum mixing
velocity when the ratio of the SAW aperture to droplet radius is 0.5.
98
Chapter 7
FREQUENCY EEFECT ON MIXING PERFORMANCE
OF A RAYLEIGH SAW
In this chapter, a streaming phenomenon of ink particles inside a water microdroplet
generated by a surface acoustic wave (SAW) has been studied numerically using a finite
volume numerical method. These results have been verified using experimental
measurements.
Effects of SAW excitation frequency, droplet volume and radio-
frequency (RF) power were investigated.
7.1
Introduction
As explained before, when liquid (either in bulk or droplet form) lies in the propagation
path of the SAW emitted by the IDT, it attenuates and changes its mode to a Leaky
Surface Acoustic Wave (LSAW) upon its arrival at the boundary between solid
(substrate) and liquid, due to acoustic velocity mismatch between the solid and the
liquid medium [149].
This leakage of the SAW inside the droplet leads to the
generation of longitudinal pressure waves that propagates at a Rayleigh angle into the
fluid [118]. Although it is well known that the leakage of acoustic energy into the fluid
medium is responsible for the SAW streaming phenomena, and the wavelength of the
Rayleigh wave λ (as a part of the absorption coefficient, E' ., i.e., Eq. 2.16) determines
the portion of acoustic energy absorbed by the fluid, few studies have been conducted
concerning the effects of wavelength (or excitation frequency) on SAW acoustic
streaming [20]. For example, Tan et al. [101, 150, 151] reported that when the width of
a grooved microchannel fabricated on the substrate surface was increased beyond an
acoustic wavelength, the induced fluid flow in the microchannel by SAW excitation
changed from an axially symmetric laminar flow to a vortical mixing flow, and became
more chaotic with further increases in the channel width. However, there was no report
on a systematic study of its mixing performance. Maezawa et al. [65] reported that
modulation of the frequencies of a SAW device improved mixing efficiency of liquids
contained inside a liquid cell driven by a SAW, but there was no discussion of the effect
of cell volume on the mixing performance. Strobl et al. [18] studied SAW-driven flow
inside microdroplets, and experimental observations showed that a laminar flow within
99
a 5 µl droplet was disturbed by switching the device frequency between 114 and 340
MHz, which resulted in effective mixing for dye particles placed in water droplet.
Clearly, apart from applied SAW power that plays an important role in SAW induced
mixing, the excitation frequency applied to the SAW devices represents another key
parameter for enhancing the streaming phenomenon and mixing performance.
Nevertheless, current literature does not provide sufficient information to quantitatively
describe the influence of excitation frequency on the efficiency of mixing in SAWbased microdroplet systems. This chapter investigates the effects of different flow
parameters, including SAW excitation frequency, droplet volume and applied power,
using a 3D systematic simulation with experimental verification. The results provide
good guidance for the selection of an optimal excitation frequency for an effective
mixing device, with a minimized applied SAW power for reducing acoustic heating.
7.2
7.2.1
Numerical Analysis
Computational experiment setup
For the simulations, water droplets with volumes of 2.5, 5.0, 7.5 and 10 µl, were
positioned on the SAW propagation path, as schematically illustrated in Fig. 4.9(a) and
excited using 128º YX-LiNbO3 SAW devices with an IDT aperture of 500 µm. Given a
uniform finger spacing and SAW width, [47] the resonant frequency for each design
IDT layout can be calculated by @ ⁄P @ ⁄4 , where @ 3992 m/s [152], where
d is the IDT finger spacing or width. In this study wavelengths ranging from 32 to 1,061
µm were used.
7.2.2
Streaming model
In order to simulate the internal fluid flow of acoustic streaming for SAW-droplet
coupling, the continuity equation Eq. (4.2a) and the Navier-Stokes equation (momentum
equation) Eq. (4.2b) were used for the laminar incompressible flow driven by an
external SAW body or streaming force (see Sect. 4.3). The verification and preliminary
results of this model have been reported previously [62, 140].
7.2.3
Mixing model
In order to evaluate the mixing performance of SAW-induced streaming in
microdroplets, the conservation equation of mixing species was used [129]:
100
bã
q ¬ · ¶ã |¶ c ã
b_
7.1
where < represents the acoustic streaming velocity, m denotes the mass fraction of
mixing species (such as dye particles in this study), which is defined as the ratio of the
mass of the mixing species in a given volume to the total mass of the mixture contained
in the same volume. The diffusion coefficient D (diffusivity of dye in water in our case)
was assumed to be 1×10-20 m2/s, and the viscosity of the dye/water solution was
estimated the same as that of pure water [8]. Thus, the mass fraction function (or colour
indicator) for an incompressible fluid can be given as:
ã (Volume occupied by dye species) / (total volume of the mixture)
7.2
The values of the mass fraction m in Eq. (7.2) should be 0 ≤ m ≤1, where, zero
corresponds to water with no dye, and a value of 1 corresponds to a volume that consists
only of the dye species. Any values between 0 and 1 represent a mixture of water and
dye species. By calculating the distributed values of the mass fraction, m, inside the
droplet, it is possible to evaluate the mixing performance of SAW-driven microdrops.
7.2.4
Boundary conditions and solution
The maximum RF power applied to the SAW device was limited to 0.5 mW, a value
which is large enough to induce efficient acoustic streaming, but without any induced
droplets deformation or pumping [62, 140]. In this case, the water droplet can be
considered as a hemispherical body, as depicted in Fig. 7.1. The droplet domain was
constructed using a curvilinear mesh with a grid resolution depending on the SAW
wavelength, to ensure the capture of any high energy dissipation [149]. For the flow
model, a non-slip boundary condition was assumed at the droplet/substrate interface,
while a stress free boundary condition was applied at the interface of the droplet and air.
For the mixing model, zero gradient mass fractions were assumed at all the droplet
boundaries. In order to visualise the whole mixing process inside the microdroplets and
to evaluate the mixing performance of the SAW devices for different design parameters,
the water droplets were initially (at time t = 0 s) assumed to have dissolvable dye
particles on the droplet base with a 70 µm height from its base and with a mass fraction
of m = 1 (the red colour base as shown in Fig. 7.1).
101
Figure 7.1 Illustration showing the initial mass fraction used in this study with a value
of m = 1.0 (dyed water) at the droplet base for a 70 µm height from its base in the y
direction, and value of 0.0 elsewhere (pure water)
7.2.5
Mixing index
In order to quantify the mixing performance of such dye within the water droplet under
the excitation of SAW, a mixing index parameter (MIP) has been used, which can be
determined from the analysis of mass fraction intensity extracted from the simulation
results:
∑ç
^°V ]^ ã^
äåÃ
] ããf
è. W
where N is the total number of computation cells in the droplet mesh, Vi is the localised
cell volume, @ is the total droplet volume initially occupied by the dye species
(+=1.0), as shown in Fig. 7.1, +,- is the maximum initial mass fraction of dye
species (set to 1 in this study). Here, the value of MIP varies between 0 (unmixed) and
1 (complete mixed). Eq. (7.3) represents the percentage of the initial dye particles at the
bottom of the droplet (i.e., seen Fig. 7.1) that have been propelled by the internal
acoustic streaming into the pure water, or driven away from the bottom of the droplet
after a SAW excitation. Thus, the defined mixing index parameter, MIP, can be used as
a measure for describing mixing performance across the different simulated regimes.
7.3
Experimental
For experimental verification, the SAW devices were fabricated on a 128o YX- black
LiNbO3 substrates by sputtering 200 nm thick aluminium to form the IDTs, with an IDT
102
aperture of 500 µm. The details of the SAW device fabrication have been documented
elsewhere [17]. The surface of the LiNbO3 wafers is hydrophilic with a water contact
angle of about 35o as can be observed. In this study, a spin-coated CYTOP® (Asahi
Glass Co., Ltd., Tokyo., Japan) layer was also prepared to make the surface
hydrophobic. Experimental instruments and measurement method were presented in
Chapter 4 (i.e., see Sec. 4.2). Water droplets with volumes ranging from 2.5 to 10 µl
were loaded at the centre of the SAW propagation path by using a Micro-Volume Kit
micropipette, similar to that illustrated in Fig. 4.9(a). In addition to droplet volume and
SAW wavelength, the effect of a moderate range of applied RF powers from 0.05 to 0.5
mW, were evaluated. These were selected to ensure that the droplet would not be
dramatically deformed but sufficient energy would be available to induce internal
streaming and mixing inside the droplets. In order to determine the streaming velocity,
polystyrene particles with average diameters of 6 µm were placed inside the water
droplets and their motion was recorded using a high speed camera (Kodak Motion
Corder Analyzer - 600 frames per second). In order to experimentally visualise the
whole mixing process inside the microdroplets and to evaluate the mixing performance
of the SAW devices for different design parameters, dried particles of food dye were
initially placed underneath the droplets (at time t = 0 s), and their mixing process inside
the droplets after the SAW power was tracked.
7.4
7.4.1
Comparison and Discussion
Acoustic mixing process
The characteristic mixing process of SAW-induced microdroplets mixing will be
discussed first. Figure 7.2 presents sequential images of the simulated mixing process of
the dye in a 5 µl droplet. Here, an RF power of 0.5 mW was applied to the SAW
device, and an excitation frequency of f = 39.92 MHz (corresponding wavelength, λ =
100 µm) was used. The first column (a) in Fig. 7.2 shows 3D volume images of the
changes of dye concentration with the time period after the SAW excitation. After
applying an RF power to the IDTs of the SAW device, a SAW was launched and
coupled with the water droplet. Its energy is radiated into the droplet at a Rayleigh
angle, inducing an effective acoustic momentum (body force) that decays exponentially
away from the SAW interaction region. This momentum source at the SAW-droplet
interaction region establishes a flow field that drives the fluid upwards at a Rayleigh
angle, resulting in build-up of a progressive flow within the droplet, as seen in the left
103
hand column of Fig. 7.2, after 0.03 s. It can be observed that in Fig. 7.2 (column (a)),
the streaming velocities are the highest near the SAW source, especially during the early
stages of flow development.
Simultaneously, the generated flow in the droplet induces advection for the dye particles
at the bottom of the droplet towards the top of the droplet at the same Rayleigh angle of
longitudinal pressure wave. This is clearly observed in the early stage images presented
in column (a) of Fig. 7.2. The flow is guided by the curved droplet/air interface back
down towards the droplet base where it is then directed back towards the SAW
excitation source along the base of the droplet. When this reverse flow reaches the
region near the SAW source, the SAW drives the reverse flow upwards again, causing
an advection for more dye particles that travels away from the droplet bottom into the
droplet volume. Finally, after a few seconds, the developed flow reaches a steady stage
of the double vortex (butterfly) flow patterns [14], as shown by the velocity vectors in
the latest stages of column (a) (time = 7 s) in Fig. 7.2. This steady flow pattern is
dependent on the excitation frequency, the applied SAW power, the droplet size and the
fluid properties [48, 62, 140].
For further analysis, the mass fraction data were divided into two groups; with the first
group covering the mass fraction range of 0-0.5 and the second one from 0.5 to 1.0. The
second column (b) in Fig. 7.2 shows the simulated contours of mass fraction ranging
from 0 to 0.5 using 3D clips (e.g., 3D droplet volume images with cutting planes along
the y and z axis showing half of the hemispherical body). These results show that the
dye particles follow the fluid flow in similar patterns with an increasing dye mixing
volume inside the whole droplet. The dye mixing volume increases continually as the
dye is fed from the dye particles at the droplet bottom, through streaming-induced
advection. This advection of the dye particles results in a decrease in the volume of the
high concentration zone (m ≥ 0.5) with the development of a streaming flow, as shown
in the third column (c) of Fig. 7.2 that covers a higher mass fraction range of 0.5-1.0.
Also, it can be observed from Fig. 7.2(c) that the quantity of dye particles driven from
the droplet base decreases with the duration of streaming flow. Eventually, the
concentration of the dye particles that dissolved in the water droplet reaches a steady
state value and the solution nearly becomes homogeneous.
104
Figure 7.3 shows that the simulation results are identical to our experimental
observations as well as those from literature [18, 93]. For comparison, dried particles of
food dye were deposited underneath a 5µl water droplet before applying RF power.
Figure 7.3 depicts four snapshots of such mixing experiments of SAW-induced
streaming. After applying the RF power, the dye is quickly mixed in the droplet in a few
seconds. As can be observed from the snapshots of the dye mixing in droplet, the
coupled SAW from the bottom of the droplet induces acoustic streaming that leads to
advection for the food dye particles at the bottom of the droplet (blue colour) towards
the top of the droplet at the Rayleigh angle of longitudinal pressure wave, as indicated
by the black dashed arrow in Fig. 7.3 at a time of 1 s, which agrees well with the results
presented in Fig. 7.2 at the same duration time. Finally, the dissolving process of the
dye particles reaches a steady state distribution inside the droplet volume, as can been
seen from both the numerical and experimental observations presented in Figs. (7.2) and
(7.3), respectively, at a duration of 7 s.
(a) 3D Volume
(b)
3D clip
(c)
3D clip
0.0 ≤ m ≤ 1
0.0 ≤ m ≤ 0.5
Time = 0 s
Time = 0 s
Time = 0 s
Time = 0.03 s
Time = 0.03 s
Time = 0.03 s
105
0.5 ≤ m ≤ 1.0
Time = 0.05 s
Time = 0.05 s
Time = 0.05 s
Time = 0.1 s
Time = 0.1 s
Time = 0.1 s
Time = 0.3 s
Time = 0.3 s
Time = 0.3 s
Time = 1.0 s
Time = 1.0 s
Time = 1.0 s
Time = 1.5 s
Time = 1.5 s
Time = 1.5 s
Time = 3.0 s
Time = 3.0 s
106
Time = 3.0 s
Time = 7.0 s
Time = 7.0 s
Time = 7.0 s
Figure 7.2 Three dimensional images of the simulated mixing process for a 5 µl water
droplet, using 128 º YX-LiNbO3
YX LiNbO3 SAW devices with 0.5 mm SAW aperture and excited
by a frequency of 39.92 MHz at an RF power of 0.5 mW.. The first row shows different
illustrations of the droplet at different views and mass fraction ranges;
range Column (a): the
mixing process in 3D volume images using mass fraction range 0.0 ≤ m ≤ 1, and the
black
ck arrows indicate the velocity vectors of the flow field; Column (b): 3D images of
the mixing process looking through the droplet by cutting slices into it, as shown in the
first row, using smaller range of mass fraction 0.0 ≤ m ≤ 0.5 ; column (c) similar
simila to
column (b) but covers the largest mass fraction range of 0.5 ≤ m ≤ 0.1.
0.1
Time = 0 s
1s
2s
7s
Figure 7.3 Side view snapshots of SAW-induced
SAW induced internal streaming in a 5 µl water
droplet, where dried particles of food dye were placed underneath the droplets. After the
SAW excitation, the dye colour quickly fills the whole droplet volume. The black arrow
with dash line shows the fluid flow inside the droplet and the red arrow indicates the
direction of the SAW propagation.
propagation
7.4.2
Mixing efficiency versus SAW excitation frequency
The relationship between the mixing efficiency and excitation frequency (or
wavelength) was studied and the values of the mixing index parameter MIP were
investigated as functions of droplet volume, wavelength and RF power. Figure 7.4(a)
shows the derived mixing efficiency
efficiency as a function of a dimensionless ratio between the
droplet radius, Rd, and the estimated attenuation length of a Rayleigh wave, lSAW [149,
153] , i.e., Rd / lSAW. In this case, a 5 µll water droplet was used, and a 500 µm aperture
107
SAW device was excited with an applied RF power of 0.5 mW. This damping length,
lSAW, of the SAW can be estimated using [50, 53, 153]:
omÉé VÁ
¡
a ]
a]Y
7.4
Where, @M is the velocity of longitudinal waves in the fluid, @ the velocity of Rayleigh
wave in solids, λ the wavelength of a Rayleigh wave, ρf and ρ is the density of the fluid
and substrate material, respectively. In order to derive more information about the
effectiveness of SAW-induced convective mixing, the relationship between MIP and Rd
/ lSAW was studied for different ranges of mass fraction. As can be observed in Fig.
7.4(a), the MIP profile that covers the whole range of mass fraction (m ≤ 1.0) shows
only minimal variation with Rd / lSAW and gives little insight into the effectiveness of the
value of Rd / lSAW on the mixing efficiency of SAW devices. Comparing these results
with other mass fraction ranges in Fig. 7.4(a), the trends for both the profiles for m ≤ 0.1
and m ≤ 0.5 are similar and show clearly that there is a critical value of Rd / lSAW = 0.92,
beyond which there is a considerable decrease in the mixing efficiency (e.g., reducing
lSAW as an increase in the excitation frequency or a decrease in wavelength). With the
acoustic energy loss being the dominant mechanism for the generation of acoustic
streaming, coupled with minimal acoustic heating resulting from the low RF power and
fluid viscosity [55, 141], this flow phenomenon can only be explained by the acoustic
energy that is absorbed by the liquid layer. Based on the results presented in Fig. 7.4(a),
the MIP profile has more sensitivity to the variation of the Rd / lSAW ratio when the mass
fraction of m ≤ 0.1 (a value that corresponds to mean mass fraction, +,.-/ = 0.1).
Hence, the mass fraction range of + ≤ +,.-/ was used in this study to quantify the
SAW mixing efficiency, where +,.-/ is the mass fraction of homogenous mixing,
which can be calculated by the ratio of initial dye volume to total droplet volume and
the maximum initial mass fraction, +,.-/ +,- @ /@ABA .
Figure 7.4(b) presents the simulated steady state (the time after which there is no
changes in the dye concentration) results of 3D clip images, showing the effect of Rd /
lSAW ratio on the dye homogeneity (or mixing efficiency). From the image of first
column (corresponding to Rd / lSAW = 0.92), the droplet mixture is shown to be extremely
homogeneous and the dye particles are distributed uniformly across the whole droplet
volume, with a mass fraction value of m ≈ 0.1 everywhere inside the droplet. In
108
contrast, when the Rd / lSAW ratio iss larger than one, such as 1.43 in Fig. 7.4(b), an
inhomogeneous mixture is obtained with less dye particles transported into the droplet
volume, due to the weakness of acoustic streaming flow, which can be seen from the
results of m ≤ 0.1 shown in Fig. 7.4(a).
(a). This flow becomes much slower with further
increases in the Rd / lSAW ratio. For example, a value of 3.35 in Fig. 7.4(b) resulted in
larger area of the dye particles that clustered at the droplet bottom,
bottom with high
concentrations (e.g., m ≥ 0.5). This can also be verified by mixing efficiency shown in
Fig. 7.4(a)
(a) for the curve of m ≥ 0.5. When the value of Rd / lSAW exceeds unity, the
percentage of the droplet volume that contains a high concentration of dye particles
significantly increases, and reaches up to 60% with further increases in Rd / lSAW,
indicated by the case of m > 0.5, show in Fig. 7.4(a).
(a). This clearly shows that the SAW
mixing becomes poorer at high frequencies.
frequencies
(a)
Rd/lSAW = 0.92
Rd/lSAW = 3.39
Rd/lSAW = 1.43
(b)
Figure 7.4 Normalised mixing intensity results for a 5 µll droplet, using 500 µm
aperture SAW device at a RF power of 0.5mW, and with an initial mass dye particles
concentration of m =1 for a 70 µm high layer from the droplet base and m = 0 elsewhere
(pure water); (a) deviation in the steady state mixing intensity as a function of Rd / lSAW
109
for different mass fraction ratios
ratio (b) 3D captured clips of the droplet showing the effect
of Rd / lSAW ratio on mixing efficiency
Figure 7.5 presents the MIP as a function of Rd / lSAW ratio at three different RF powers
power
(0.05, 0.15 and 0.50 mW) using a 2.5 µll droplet with an initial dye concentration similar
to that shown in Fig. 7.1.. Generally, the relationship for each power in Fig. 7.5 shows a
similar trend to that of 5 µl droplet in Fig. 7.4(a)
(a) for equal mass fraction range of m ≤
0.1. This indicates that the mechanism of the dye mass transported by a bulk liquid
circulation of SAW excitation is similar. However, beyond a critical Rd / lSAW ratio
which is dependent upon RF power, further increase in this ratio results in a
considerable decrease in the mixing
mixing efficiency. The results show that, the critical ratio
of Rd / lSAW decreases from 0.86 at an RF power of 0.5 mW to about 0.6, when a lower
RF power of 0.05 mW is applied to the SAW device. This could be the result of less
acoustic energy being absorbed by the water droplet with the same fluid inertia, causing
a slow streaming flow, and thus a less mixing efficiency [62].. It is also interesting to
note from the results that when the Rd / lSAW ratios are much smaller than one, a mixing
efficiency of 100% can be obtained even with a small value of SAW powers of 0.05
mW. This reveals that if the condition of mean critical ratio of Rd / lSAW ≤ 1.0 has been
reached, the devices with a lower frequency
frequency could induce efficient mixing, even with
low SAW powers.
Figure 7.5 Variation of mixing efficiency for 2.5 µll droplets as a function of Rd / lSAW
for different RF power, using 500 µm apertures SAW devices.
110
In order to further clarify the role of the Rd / lSAW ratio (e.g., acoustic wavelength or
frequency) in the SAW-droplet based mixing system, a probability distribution function
(PDF) of the dye particles concentration, m, was calculated at three different Rd / lSAW
ratios for two droplets of 2.5 and 5.0 µl, and at a duration time of steady state mixing
(no variation in the dye concentration in droplets with further increase in duration time).
The PDFs were obtained through calculating the total mixture (e.g., dye/water) volume
contained in the droplet,@ for a set of mass fraction groups, mi, which were further
normalized by the total volume of the droplet @ABA . The mass fractions were classified
into 10 groups ranging from 0 to 1.0, in order to distinguish and quantify the mixing
performance for each Rd / lSAW ratio, as shown in Fig. 7.6, using a log-scale.
Figure 7.6(a) shows that for a 2.5 µl droplet, the value of PDF initially is about 10%
(with mass fraction of one). Under SAW excitation, the dye particles distribute across
the volume of water droplet and reach a steady state distribution in a few seconds.
However, the mixing behavior depends strongly on the value of the Rd / lSAW ratio. For
the ratios smaller than a mean value of 1.0, such as Rd /lSAW =0.43 presented in Fig.
7.6(a), the histogram of PDF has only one component at a mass fraction of mi = 0.1,
indicating a homogeneous mixture, and effective SAW-induced mixing. In contrast, for
larger Rd /lSAW ratios, such as 1.37 and 2.47 presented in Fig. 7.6 (a), non-uniform
distributions of the dye particles inside the water droplet are obtained. With further
increases in the Rd / lSAW ratio above one, clustering of high concentration dye particles
of m ≥ 0.5 at the droplet bottom is observed, as shown in Fig. 7.4(b), indicating that
mixing is inefficient. In general, the data in Fig. 7.6(b) for a 5 µl water droplet show
similar behaviours to those in Fig. 7.6(a) where good mixing is achieved when the Rd /
lSAW ratios are less than 1.0.
111
2.5µl-0.5mW
100
0.43
(∑Vi/Vtot ) %
1.37
2.47
10
Intial
1
0.1
0.1 0.2
0.3 0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
mi
(a)
5µl-0.5mW
100
0.92
(∑Vi/Vtot ) %
1.94
3.39
10
Intial
1
0.1
0.01
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
mi
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
(b)
Figure 7.6 Probability distribution function (PDF) quantifying the distributions of the
dye particles for different Rd / lSAW ratios at 0.5 mW RF power; (a) for a 2.5 µl droplet;
(b) for a 5 µll droplet. The probability values of the histogram were
we obtained through
normalising the total mixing volume by a total droplet volume
However, results show that the SAW-induced
induced mixing within a small droplet is more
homogeneous than that of larger volumes with the same Rd / lSAW ratios. Figure 7.7
shows the variation of the MIP as a function of droplet radius Rd at an RF power of 0.5
112
mW with an Rd / lSAW ratio of ~1.1. As can be seen clearly, an increase in the droplet
radius (or size) results in a decrease in the mixing efficiency. This can be explained by
the increase of liquid inertia for a larger droplet, resulting in a slower streaming velocity
(e.g., measured at the top centre of droplets) as shown in Fig. 7.7. This has been verified
based on both simulations and experimental observations using a high speed camera
(Kodak Motion Corder Analyzer - 600 frames per second).
100
0.014
Rd /lSAW ≈ 1.1
∑Vimi / V0mmax (%)
0.012
U-Exp.
90
U-Num.
0.01
80
0.008
70
0.006
60
0.004
50
Streaming velocity U (m/s)
MIP
0.002
40
0
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
Rd (mm)
Figure 7.7 Variation of mixing efficiency, and streaming velocity (both from
experiment and simulation) as a function of droplets radius, using 500 µm apertures
SAW devices with Rd / lSAW ≈ 1.1 and 0.5 mW RF power
Effects of the Rd / lSAW ratios on variations of MIP as a function of time were also
investigated for different droplet volumes and RF powers. Figures 7.8(a) and (b) show
the development of dye particles mixing inside water droplets of 2.5 and 5.0 µl
volumes, respectively, with an applied SAW power of 0.5 mW. After an RF power is
applied to the SAW device, a non-zero MIP value is obtained, which increases
gradually and finally approaches a steady-state value, depending on the SAW power,
excitation frequency and droplet volume. As clearly shown in Figs. 7.8(a) and (b), the
mixing rate and efficiency are determined by the values of Rd / lSAW ratios (or SAW
frequencies). Fast mixing processes are obtained when the Rd / lSAW ratios are smaller
than one. In contrast, when Rd / lSAW ratios are larger than one, lower mixing rates and
efficiencies are induced, as shown in Figs. 7.8(a) and (b). For instance, from data in Fig.
7.8(b), the values of mixing rate and mixing efficiency for the Rd / lSAW ratio of 0.54 are
113
~ 48 s-1 and ~ 79 %, respectively, whereas these are only ~18 s-1 and ~37 % for an Rd /
lSAW ratio of 1.74. From the profiles in Figs. 7.8(a) and (b), the mixing efficiencies for
the Rd / lSAW ratios less than unity are similar for the same droplet volumes and are about
100 % for of 2.5 µl and 80 % for of 5 µl droplet, even though the mixing rate was
different for the different ratios. These results confirm that SAW-driven convective
mixing is inefficient when the Rd / lSAW >> 1.0.
Figure 7.8(c) shows the variation of the MIP as a function of time for three different
applied RF powers of 0.05, 0.15 and 0.5 mW for a 2.5 µl droplet with the Rd / lSAW ratio
fixed at 0.56. This shows that the mixing rate is enhanced and mixing time is reduced
with an increase in the RF power. For example, the mixing duration is only 4 s at an RF
power of 0.5 mW, while it is 61 s at 0.05 mW. Nevertheless, the steady-state value of
mixing efficiency is not influenced significantly by the applied RF power, whereas the
results presented in Figs. 7.8(a) and (b) clearly show that the mixing efficiency changes
significantly with the Rd / lSAW ratio (e.g., SAW excitation frequency).
2.5µl at 0.5 mW
∑Vimi / V0mmax (%)
100
80
60
0.56
0.86
1.46
2.69
Rd /lSAW
40
20
0
0
2
4
6
Time (s)
(a)
114
8
10
5µl at 0.5 mW
90
∑Vimi / V0mmax (%)
80
70
0.54
60
Rd /lSAW
50
0.92
1.74
3.39
40
30
20
10
0
0
2
4
6
8
Time (s)
(b)
(c)
Figure 7.8 Mixing efficiency (MIP % for mmen) as a function of time for (a) 2.5 µl
water droplets - RF power of 0.5 mW (b) 5 µl water droplets - RF power of 0.5 mW,
(c) of 2.5 µl water droplets at Rd / lSAW = 0.56 for different RF powers of 0.015, 0.05
and 0.5 mW.
115
7.4.3
Acoustic streaming versus SAW wavelength
The effects of a droplet volume and applied power on the streaming flow have been
reported [62]. In this section, acoustic streaming phenomena and flow patterns were
investigated for different Rd / lSAW ratios. Figures 7.9(a) and (b) present the distribution
of simulated streaming velocities for a 2.5 µl water droplet with different Rd / lSAW ratios,
measured along the z and y axis of the droplet. Clearly, a decrease in the Rd / lSAW ratio
results in an enhancement in the streaming velocities. When the Rd / lSAW ratio is less
than one, higher velocity gradients are observed inside the droplet, whereas smaller
gradients are seen for Rd / lSAW ratios larger than one, indicating a weakness of flow
circulation by SAW excitation. These results support those in Figs. 7.4 and 7.5, i.e.,
with the higher the velocity gradient in the droplet, the better the mixing process, due to
a stronger streaming-driven convection being produced. Therefore, the larger the shear
velocity gradients across the droplet axis, the faster the convective velocities that
transport the dye particles into the bulk droplet, resulting in a more efficient mixing
process.
(a)
116
(b)
Figure 7.9 Simulated streaming velocity profiles measured along two different axes
into a 2.5 µl droplet for a range of Rd / lSAW ratios, using 500 µm aperture SAW device
with an RF power of 0.5 mW; (a) measured along the z axis at 500 µm height from the
droplet bottom; (b) radial distribution measured along the y axis at the droplet centre
To clarify the physics behind the effects of the Rd / lSAW ratio, the characteristic flow
parameters of a 5.0 µl droplet with an applied power of 0.5 mW were calculated, and
the results are listed in Table 7.1. This shows that although the streaming force is
enhanced, the increase in the excitation frequency (or decrease in wavelength) offsets
the increase of streaming velocity (measured at the top centre of droplet).
These
conflicting mechanisms can be attributed to the decrease in the SAW attenuation length,
lSAW [50, 149], due to the increase in the excitation frequency, which causes the SAW
acoustic energy to be strongly absorbed by the liquid, and hence the higher rate of
energy dissipation. Consequently, the more rapid the acoustic energy dissipation, the
smaller the energy to be reach the droplet top free surface, which in turn results in a
slower flow circulation due to a large fluid inertia, and less effective mixing.
117
Table 7.1 Characteristic flow parameters for numerical simulation of 5.0 µl droplet at
RF power 0.5 mW.
Wavelength
Excitation
λ
frequency
(µm)
200
117.888
Rd /lSAW
f
SAW
Streaming
Streaming
MIP
amplitude
force, F
velocity
%
A
-3
U
3
(ms-1)
(Nm )
(MHz)
lSAW, Eq.
(Aº)
× 10
Eq. (2.12)
(7.4)
Eq. (4.8)
Eq.(4.7)
19.96
0.543743
2.971
14.524
0.032573
78.61178
0.922474
1.752
24.641
0.021347
78.42174
33.862
Eq.(7.3)
100
39.92
1.087486
1.485
29.012
0.016342
75.35968
75.7857
52.6748
1.434949
1.125
38.288
0.008128
57.87846
58.944
67.7274
1.844947
0.875
49.282
0.00312
30.50193
32
124.75
3.398393
0.4755
90.778
0.00027
7.487235
Figure 7.10 shows the simulated distribution profiles of SAW streaming force along the
propagation path of the longitudinal wave starting from the SAW interaction point (near
SAW source) towards the top centre of a 5.0 µl water droplet and for different Rd / lSAW
ratios, using a 500 µm aperture SAW device at an applied RF power of 0.5 mW.
Figure 7.10 shows that the streaming forces decrease with the distance from the
interaction region of SAW, which indicates damping of the wave. Comparing results for
the different Rd /lSAW ratios, the value of streaming force at the interaction region (near
the SAW source) is enhanced by increasing the ratio of Rd / lSAW. Nevertheless, the
momentum of acoustic energy (streaming force) that is transferred away from the SAW
interaction region decreases significantly with an increase in the Rd / lSAW ratio,
especially when the Rd / lSAW ratio is larger than one. This is attributed to an increase in
attenuation rate with increasing SAW excitation frequency as listed in Table 7.1.
Figure 7.11 presents the simulation results of the flow streaming patterns induced by
SAW excitation in a 2.5 µl droplet with an applied RF power of a 0.5 mW for a range of
Rd / lSAW ratios. These results show that the flow patterns are strongly affected by the
frequency, especially for a high excitation frequency, or the Rd / lSAW ratios larger than
unity. Therefore, the streaming patterns can be classified into two groups based upon
the shape of the flow axis of rotation. The first group is associated with the ratio of Rd /
lSAW ≤ 1.0 and the regular butterfly patterns are observed, where the fluid flow rotates
118
about one elliptical axis of rotation through the droplet centre in a similar manner to
those shown in the first and second column in Fig. 7.11. In the second group, when the
ratio of Rd / lSAW >> 1.0, such as 1.41 and 2.93, an irregular (weak) streaming pattern
results, where the fluid flow rotates about two individual axes of rotation, as shown in
the third and forth column in Fig. 7.11. When the regular butterfly patterns are induced
by the SAW with a ratio of Rd / lSAW ≤ 1.0, the strong interaction between the driving
flow and back flow contributes to the mixing efficiency. This is confirmed by results of
different mixing index parameters presented in Figs. (7.4) to (7.7) showing an effective
mixing and better homogeneity for the solution mixture. In contrast, an ineffective
mixing were induced for an Rd / lSAW >> 1.0, where the longitudinal pressure wave
arriving at the droplet free surface is strongly attenuated thus resulting in a weak
acoustic streaming force. This demonstrates that the streaming velocity, flow profiles
and mixing efficiency all are influenced by the SAW excitation frequency.
3
×10
Figure 7.10 Measurements of acoustic streaming force at SAW interaction point and
along the propagation direction of the longitudinal wave towards the top centre of 5.0 µl
droplet, and for Rd / lSAW ratios; the black line in the droplet show the measuring path of
acoustic streaming force
119
0.83
1.09
1.41
2.93
Figure 7.11 Simulated results showing the changes in the streaming patterns with
Rd / lSAW ratio, and for 2.5 µl droplet using 0.5 mm aperture SAW device and 0.5 mW
RF power. The first row shows a top view of the double vorticity; the second row shows
the side view focusing through the droplet centre, and the third row views the droplet
from the front. The yellow arrow indicates the SAW direction and the red broken lines
the axis of rotation.
7.5
Summary
In summary, a SAW-driven mixing process of the dye particles inside microdroplets has
been simulated numerically and verified experimentally, in order to investigate the
effect of SAW excitation frequency (or wavelength) in the flow streaming and mixing
process for a range of droplet volumes and RF powers. It has been shown that a higher
RF power and a decreased droplet size results in an increase in the streaming velocity
and mixing efficiency, whereas a higher excitation frequency can result in less effective
mixing with a slower mixing rate, due to weakness of streaming flow. The SAW
attenuation length, lSAW, (a factor directly related to the SAW excitation frequency and
wavelength) has been identified as a parameter indicating the efficiency of SAWinducing convective mixing. A fast and effective mixing process results until lSAW
reaches a critical value, beyond which a significant decrease in streaming velocity and
mixing efficiency is observed. The magnitude of streaming velocity, mixing rate and
efficiency were determined by the droplet size to be a highest when the ratio of the
droplet radius to SAW attenuation length Rd / lSAW ≤ 1.0, even at small SAW powers,
120
such as 0.05 mW. In contrast, inhomogeneous mixtures with slower mixing rates were
obtained when Rd / lSAW >> 1.0, due to the higher attenuation rate of acoustic energy and
minimisation of energy reaching the droplet free surface. As a high power results in a
significant heating effect, this mean critical ratio, i.e., (Rd / lSAW ≤ 1) can be used as a
guideline in the SAW device design for microfluidic applications that include
temperature sensitive biological samples inside the microdroplet [141, 142].
121
Chapter 8
SCALLING EFFECTS IN SAW STREAMING
This chapter reports an experimental and numerical investigation on the scaling effects
in the flow hydrodynamics for confined microdroplets induced by a Rayleigh surface
acoustic wave. The characteristic parameters of the flow hydrodynamics were studied
as a function of the separation height, H, between the LiNbO3 substrate and a top glass
plate, for various droplets volumes and radio-frequency (RF) powers.
8.1
Introduction
Although SAW-induced streaming has been studied extensively in digital microfluidics
[16, 62], fewer studies have been reported for SAW microfluidics in confined spaces or
microchannels [151]. In some recent work [34, 150, 151], a top-open microchannel was
fabricated on the substrate surface of a LiNbO3 SAW device using laser
micromachining. These studies showed that the changes in the SAW excitation
frequencies switch the flow pattern from uniform (parallel) to mixing (vortical) flow,
depending on the ratio of wavelength to microchannel width. Gu et al. [154] studied the
performance of a non-contact linear motor driven by a SAW through a thin liquid layer
on which the slider was suspended. The motor was contained within a top-open glass
cell located at the SAW device surface. Results showed that the velocity of the slider is
proportional to the power applied to the SAW device, and is also dependant on the
thickness of the liquid layer.
For semi-closed microfluidic systems, Shiokawa et al. [52] reported that placing a guide
plate on the top of a liquid layer is an effective method to control the flow of the liquid
in the propagation path of a SAW, but the flow velocities were slower than that of liquid
without a top plate, due to the resultant shear gradient induced at the surface of the top
plate. A similar experimental set up has also been used in many SAW-mixing studies
[25, 64], and results showed that the flow patterns in the droplets with a top plate
enhanced the mixing efficiency of the contained micro-particles.
For closed microchannels, Schmid et al. [153] observed that the scattering of SAW
energy which was leaked through a liquid layer into the upper glass slide generated an
122
acoustic power, which was able to drive and pump biological substances in a
rectangular Polydimethylsioxane (PDMS) microchannel located on the glass slide.
SAW-induced streaming has been reported to be one of the more efficient techniques to
enhance mixing efficiency in a continuous microchannel flow [67, 142].
Microchannel design (i.e., shape and geometry) has also been reported to influence the
flow characteristics inside the microchannels [11]. For example, microchannel height
has been reported to have significant influences on the characteristic flow parameters of
streaming phenomena induced by a flexural plate wave (FPW) [155-157]. Min-Chien
and Tzong-Shyng [158] showed that, within a microchannel with a height < 100 µm, the
induced shear stress from the side walls causes a significant effect on the streaming
velocity profiles. Guo et al. [159] theoretically studied the acoustic streaming generated
by a lead zirconium titanate (PZT) piezoelectric ceramic plate attached to the bottom of
micro-machined silicon microchannel. Their results showed that acoustic streaming
velocity was dependent not only on the acoustic power, but also on the channel height,
and a maximum streaming velocity was increased from 0.16 to 0.2 m/s by increasing
the channel height from 0.5 to 1 mm.
Clearly all these studies exhibit apparent significant scaling effects of height on the
streaming flow induced by acoustic waves in confined microdroplets or microchannels.
However, it should be noted that most studies of height effects induced by SAW
streaming were based on the microdroplet or open microchannels with no top-plate. So
far, to the best of author’s knowledge, there have been no systematic studies of the
height scaling effect on SAW streaming in a confined microdroplet. Clearly, a simple
but an efficient method is needed to evaluate this scaling effect in confined
microfluidics. In this chapter experimental and numerical investigations for the height
scaling effects on the characteristic flow hydrodynamics were carried out for confined
microdroplets actuated with a SAW technology.
8.2
Experimental and Numerical Details
The configuration of the experimental setup includes a glass slide and a LiNbO3
substrate, the latter of which generates the SAW. The slide and substrate are separated
by a distance H and a water microdroplet placed between them, as shown in Fig. 8.1.
The microfluidic experiments were carried out using a 128º YX-LiNbO3 SAW devices
123
with an aperture of 1.5 mm, a finger width of 16 µm and a wavelength of 64 µm. The
measured excitation frequency of the SAW device is ~ 60 MHz. In this study, a
CYTOP®(Asahi Glass Co., Ltd., Tokyo Japan) layer was spin-coated on both the top
glass slide and LiNbO3 SAW substrate surface to make the surfaces hydrophobic, as
hydrophilic surface have been reported to suppress the streaming velocity [52, 86]. The
space between the top glass plate and substrate, defined in this study as the gap height
H, were set to 65, 102, 271, 548 and 1,113 µm by using specially designed spacers, as
illustrated in Figs. 8.1 and 8.2(a). The droplet volumes were adjusted in order to
maintain a constant droplet diameter of either ~ 2.2 or ~ 3 mm. In order to determine the
streaming velocity, polystyrene particles with average diameters of 6 µm were placed
inside the water droplets and their motions were recorded using a high speed camera
(Kodak Motion Corder Analyzer - 600 frames per second), as demonstrated in Fig. 8.1.
High Speed Camera
Confined Droplet
SAW device setup
SAW device setup
Top Glass Cover
Spacer
Figure 8.1 Photograph of an experimental setup used for height effect measurements
For the flow hydrodynamic simulations, the laminar incompressible Navier-Stokes
equation of SAW-liquid coupling [140], driven by an external body force, F (i.e., see
Sect. 4.3), was solved numerically in three-dimension using a finite volume numerical
method [129]. The meshing of the confined droplet domain was built using a curvilinear
grid structure with a grid size of 50 x 25 x 50 cell nodes, in x, y and z axis, respectively.
124
As can be observed from Fig. 8.2(c), the interface curvature of the droplet is small and
can be reasonably approximated by a straight line with a wetting angle of ~ 90º. Hence
in the simulation, the droplet contact angle at the solid surface was assumed to be 90º
and the small deviation from the actual contact angle was ignored. In all the
experimental tests of this study, no significant deformation at the droplet/air interface
was observed due to the low SAW power used during the streaming process, therefore,
a slip (or stress free) boundary condition on the droplet/air interface, and a non-slip
boundary condition on the droplet/solid surface (glass slide and substrate surface) were
assumed, as indicated in Fig. 8.2. The streaming simulations were carried out using a
SAW device with an excitation frequency of 60 MHz. As mentioned above, the droplet
volumes were set by fixing the droplet diameter at 2 mm with gap heights of 50, 100,
250, 333, 400, 500, 600, 750 and 1,000 µm. RF powers ranging from 0.5 to 50 mW
were applied in the simulations.
Figure 8.2 Schematic illustration of experimental and numerical setups; (a) Top view;
(b) Cross sectional view; (c) Captured Cross-section image of 4 µl droplet from side
view during the experiment with a gap height (H) of 1,113 µm
8.3
8.3.1
Results and Discussions
Streaming velocity versus RF power and gap height
Variations of the streaming velocity as a function of the RF power and gap height were
studied both experimentally and theoretically. From the results, the streaming velocity
is dependent not only on the RF power and liquid volume (or droplet diameter, ), but
also on the separation between the top plate and substrate (or gap height, H). Figure 8.3
shows the experimental results of the streaming velocities measured at the top centre of
125
the droplets (point A as shown in Fig. 8.2) as a function of the RF powers for different
droplet volumes and gap heights. These results show that the streaming velocity
increases with increase of the RF power, because at high powers, a higher acoustic
pressure or momentum will be delivered to the liquid layer due to the increased SAW
amplitude. A linear relationship between the streaming velocity and RF power is
observed for smaller gap heights such as of 271 and 102 µm in Fig. 8.3. This linearity is
reasonable because of higher shear gradient of flow at the solid wall (e.g., top plate)
with such small gap heights [74]. This, in turn results in a slower flow motion in the
droplet when Reynolds number values approach unity. In this study, the droplet
diameter is used as a length scale in the calculation of Reynolds number. With such a
small value of Reynolds number or creeping flow, inertial effects (hydrodynamics
nonlinearity) do not play a significant role in comparison with the viscous effects [56].
In contrast, a nonlinear variation of streaming velocity with the RF power is obtained
for a larger gap height of 548 µm. High speed camera observations revealed that the
speed of polystyrene beads inside the droplets was only 0.9 mm/s for a small gap height
of a 271 µm, whereas it was a 4.6 mm/s with larger gap height of a 548 µm, at the same
RF power of ~ 0.03 W. Results in Fig. 8.4 clearly show the influence of gap height on
the SAW streaming flow.
Figure 8.3 Experimental measurements of maximum streaming velocity as a function
of RF power for a ~3 mm droplet diameter and different gap heights, using a 128º YXLiNbO3 SAW device with a 1.5 mm aperture excited by a frequency of 60 MHz
126
Figure 8.4 shows the variation of streaming velocity data measured at point A, as shown
in Fig. 8.2, as a function of gap height, H, for droplets with nominal diameters of ~2.2
and ~3 mm, and SAW excitation powers of 0.01, 0.03 and 0.1 W. From results of a ~3
mm droplet diameter
iameter shown in Fig. 8.4(a),
), the streaming velocity is suppressed as the
gap height decreases, due to the increase in shear force gradient.
Generally, the
variation of streaming velocities with the gap height is nearly linear due to the lower
value of inertial
ertial forces in comparison with viscous forces at lower velocities.
In general, the
he data in Fig. 8.4(b) for a droplet with a diameter of ~ 2.2 mm shows a
similar phenomenon to those in Fig. 8.4(a)
(a) where the streaming velocity is enhanced as
the gap height increases. However, beyond a critical gap height of ~ 550 µm, any
further increase in the separation results in a decrease in the streaming velocity. As the
acoustic energy loss is the only mechanism for the generation of acoustic streaming, and
acoustic
ustic heating is also minimal at small applied power and fluid viscosity [141, 142],
this flow phenomenon can only be explained by the acoustic energy that was leaked into
the liquid layer, a phenomenon which will be explained in detail in Sect.
Sec 8.3.2.
(a)
127
(b)
Figure 8.4 Experimental results of streaming velocity at the top of a droplet as a
function of gap height for different RF power levels using 128º YX-LiNbO
YX
3 SAW
device with a 1.5 mm aperture excited by a frequency of a 60 MHz; (a) Droplet
diameter of 3.0 mm; (b) Droplet diameter of 2.2 mm
Figure 8.5 shows numerical simulations of the detailed
etailed flow characteristics at various
RF powers and gap heights. These results show that the streaming velocity (measured at
point A in Fig. 8.2) increases with the gap height until reaching a critical value for the
gap height, Hcr, of 500 µm,, above which the streaming velocity decreases. Considering
the uncertainty associated with the experimental measurements, the critical value
obtained from the simulation agrees well with the critical gap height of ~ 550 µm
obtained from the experimental measurements. However, when H is < 500 µm, the
streaming velocity decreases
decrease as the gap height decreases, which could be attributed to
the increase in the dragging forces at the top and bottom solid boundaries
boundar (e.g., top glass
plate) [11]. With further reduction in the gap height to 50 µm,
m, the simulated streaming
velocity almost approaches
approache zero, especially with RF powers < 0.05 W.
Indeed, our observations using a high speed camera showed that when the gap height
was reduced to ~ 65 µm,
µm the velocity of polystyrene particles in the droplets was almost
zero, and the liquid inside the droplet did not show any apparent flow patterns over the
range of RF power used in this study, as can be observed in Fig. 8.4(b). In general, the
experimental results in Fig. 8.4 are in good agreement with those obtained from the
numerical simulations shown in Fig. 8.5.
128
ê c ãã
Figure 8.5 Numerical results showing the maximum streaming velocity at the top centre
of the droplet as a function of gap height for a 2mm droplet diameter and different RF
power levels, using a 128º YX-LiNbO3 SAW device with an excitation frequency of 60
MHz.
8.3.2
Physical mechanism
In order to explain the observed flow phenomena at various gap heights, the mechanism
of SAW acoustic streaming and the SAW attenuation in the liquid layer should include
a consideration of flow parameters, such as Reynolds number. As explained in Chapter
2, the emission of this compressional (longitudinal) waves leads to an attenuation of
SAW, within an absorption coefficient of E' , i.e., Eq. (2.16), which damps
exponentially within an attenuation length of lSAW, causing a change in its mode to a
Leaky SAW (LSAW) [86], as show in Fig. 8.6(a). This damping length, lSAW, of the
SAW can be estimated using Eq. (7.4).
In this study, a wavelength of λ = 64 µm and an excitation frequency of f = 60 MHz
were used, and the liquid (water) density is taken as LM = 1,000 kg/m3. The density of
the SAW device substrate (128º YX-LiNbO3 material) is 4,630 kg/m3 [152]. The
calculated velocity of the SAW, @ , is 3,840 m/s, based on @ P [47], and the sound
velocity in the fluid, @M , is 1,500 m/s. It should be noted that the parallel component of
the particle motion of a Rayleigh SAW at substrate surface leads to frictional losses,
which can be calculated using the viscosity of liquid layer, µ, using Eq. (2.20). The
calculation based on Eqs. (2.16) and (2.20) shows that EF ª E' . Therefore, in
129
comparison with the contribution of longitudinal wave, the attenuation due to viscous
losses can be neglected in this study, [86].
Thus, the SAW attenuation length in this study was calculated using Eq. (7.4) with a
value of lSAW ≈ 750 µm, i.e., a length required for the acoustic energy to be completed
absorbed by the droplet liquid. The leakage of acoustic energy by SAW into the liquid
droplet results in a net body force, F, (force per unit volume) [41, 48], which can be
calculated using Eq. (4.7).
Both the experimental and numerical results show that, when the gap height is less than
~ 500 µm, the streaming velocity is enhanced with increasing gap height. In this regime,
the acoustic energy absorbed by the liquid layer due to the emission of longitudinal
waves induces an acoustic streaming flow. If these waves propagate through a liquid
layer of gap heights less than its damping length, a part of the longitudinal waves will
be refracted from the liquid layer into the upper glass slide, which means that less
energy will be coupled into the liquid layer. Indeed, the distribution profile of streaming
force presented in Fig. 8.6(b) shows that the portion of acoustic momentum delivered to
the liquid by the SAW per unit area (i.e., area under curve) at small gap heights such as
100 µm is smaller than that of larger heights. Therefore, with a smaller gap, less energy
will be delivered from the SAW. Also the corresponding increase in the wall shear
resistance from the top plate will contribute to a decrease in the streaming velocity.
Therefore, any increase in the gap height will enhance the SAW momentum, and hence
the streaming velocity.
130
Figure 8.6 Leaky SAW induces body (streaming) force; (a) illustration shows
attenuation of leaky SAW by liquid coupling and the propagation direction of an
induced longitudinal wave; (b) calculated streaming force at SAW interaction point and
along the propagation direction of the longitudinal wave towards the upper glass slide
However, it has been shown earlier in this chapter that if the gap height is increased
beyond a critical value of ~ 500 µm, the streaming velocity will drop gradually, as
shown in Figs. 8.4 and 8.5. This reduction in the value of streaming velocity with gap
heights larger than ~ 500 µm can also be explained from Fig. 8.6(b). An increase in the
gap height beyond a 500 µm will induce a negligible increase in the SAW momentum
delivered to the fluid, where the most of the acoustic momentum is already coupled into
the fluid. On the other hand, there is a large increase in the mass inertia of the droplet
volume with increased gap height, which could explain the decrease of the streaming
velocities as the gap heights larger than ~ 500 µm.
Figure 8.7 shows simulation results of Reynolds number (using the value of the
streaming velocity at point A, shown in Fig. 8.2) as a function of the normalised gap
height, " ⁄()* for a range of acoustic powers (the droplet diameter is 2 mm). This
reveals that if the gap height, ", exceeds a critical percent of the attenuation length of
the Rayleigh SAW, lSAW, which has been identified as" ⁄()* ë 0.7, the Reynolds
number decreases dramatically with further increases in the gap height, especially at
excitation RF powers larger than 1 mW, which corresponds to a critical gap height of
131
500 µm,
m, in which the amplitude
amplitude of the LSAW nearly attenuates to ~ 1/e, as
shown by the value of streaming force in Fig. 8.6(b).
Figure 8.7 Numerical results of Reynolds number as a function of normalized gap
height for 2 mm droplet diameter excited
excit by a range of RF powers using a 128º YXLiNbO3 SAW device with 1.5 mm aperture and excitation
tation frequency of a 60 MHz
For smaller gap heights, as the dimensionless gap height ratio, H/lSAW < 0.067
(equivalent to H < 50 µm),
m), the momentum of the SAW produces a slower
slow flow motion
(with Re ≤ 1) even at the highest RF power of 0.05 W in this study (see Fig. 8.7). From
experiments, the motion of polystyrene particles becomes undetectable for gap heights
< 100 µm, and the polystyrene
olystyrene particles quickly adhered to the substrate surface due to
t
the large shear gradients generated near the solid surfaces at small gap heights [11], as
shown in Fig. 8.7. During the experiments with gap height of 65 µm, there was no
apparent streaming effect or motion of the polystyrene particles even when the applied
RF power was increased up to 20 W. However, these higher powers induce a significant
heating effect, causing the severe evaporation of the liquid,
liquid as shown in Fig. 8.8.
Weilin et al. [160] have also reported a similar significant increase in the viscous
friction in the case of liquid flows in trapezoidal
trapezoidal silicon microchannel when the channel
height was changed from 111 to 28 µm.
132
(a)
(b)
Figure 8.8 Experimental captured images of a droplet located on a 128º YX-LiNbO3
substrate in line with a SAW device with 1.5 mm aperture and gap height of a 65 µm
(top view) (a) Before applying the RF power; (b) after application of a 20 W RF power
and excitation frequency of 60 MHz, showing the heating and evaporation
Figure 8.9 shows the simulated streaming velocity profiles as a function of distance
above the substrate for a range of gap heights and RF powers measured at the droplet
centre through its height. Figure 8.10 shows the corresponding velocity vectors values
at a gap height of 1,000 µm and measured at the centre of the droplet through its height.
Figure 8.9(a), shows that when the gap height exceeds 500 µm at an excitation RF
power of 5 mW, there is a gradual decrease in the streaming velocity. Below this value
the velocity also reduces and when the gap height < 100 µm, the streaming velocity
decreases to < 20 % of the peak value. For gap heights of 50 µm, the induced streaming
is actually a creeping motion with a very low Reynolds number of Re ≤ 1. Figure 8.9(b)
shows results for an RF power of 100mW, and similarly the streaming velocity is
strongly suppressed as long as the gap height is < 100 µm (or " ⁄()* < 0.13), with a
minor difference in velocity profiles for a gap height of 1,000 µm compared with Fig.
8.9 (a). This is mainly due to the significant increase in velocity at the top of the droplet,
resulting from increasing the RF power from 5 mW to 100 mW. These can be clearly
revealed from the differences in the velocity vectors illustrated in Fig. 8.10 for the two
different RF powers. Besides, the results in Fig. 8.9 show that the flow symmetry along
the gap height is broken (e.g., asymmetry velocity profile), for gap heights beyond "# ,
of a 500 µm.
133
(a)
(b)
Figure 8.9 Numerical simulation results of the velocity profile for a 2 mm droplet
diameter with different gap heights and measured at the droplet centre through its
height, using a 128º YX-LiNbO3 SAW device with a 1.5 mm aperture excited by a
frequency of 60 MHz; (a) at an RF power of 5 mW; (b) at an RF power of 100 mW
134
2 mm
(a)
(b)
Figure 8.10 Cross-sectional numerical simulation results of velocity vectors values of
2mm droplet at gap height of 1,000 µm and measured at the centre of the droplet
through its height; using a 128º YX-LiNbO3 SAW device excited by a frequency of 60
MHz ; (a) at an RF power of 5 mW; (b) at an RF power of 100 mW. Coloured vectors
show flow direction and velocity value
8.4
Summary
This study presents an experimental and numerical investigation for the scaling effects
on the characteristic flow hydrodynamics in a confined microdroplet induced by SAW.
The configuration of the study set-up includes a top glass slide and LiNbO3 substrate on
the propagation path of a SAW, between which a liquid microdroplet was placed. The
microfluidic experiments were carried out using 128º YX-LiNbO3 SAW devices excited
with a frequency of 60 MHz. Analysis from both the experimental and numerical
results showed that, compared with freestanding droplets, there is a significant scaling
effect that influences the streaming behaviour of flow hydrodynamics in the
microdroplets confined between the two plates. For example, if the gap height, H, is <
135
100 µm, the characteristic streaming velocity reduces considerably with a decrease in
the gap height, and approaches zero at a gap height of 50 µm. Therefore, the ability of
using the SAW momentum to drive the fluids into confined spaces or microchannels at
smaller gap heights will be problematic, due to the increased wall shear gradient at
smaller gap heights [11]. Furthermore, it has been observed that there is a critical value
for the gap height, above which the streaming velocity decreases. This critical value
have been characterised by a dimensionless ratio of the gap height, H, and the
attenuation length of the Rayleigh SAW, ()* where the detailed experimental and
numerical results have revealed this critical value to be " ⁄()*
136
#
ë 0.7.
Chapter 9
CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE WORK
Microscale mixing and pumping are essential elements in a variety of microfluidic
applications such as biochemical analysis and drug delivery [161-163]. However,
effective mixing and pumping of liquids in microlitre volumes or smaller is extremely
challenging due to the inherently low Reynolds number flow conditions [12, 164]. One
approach to addressing this problem is to employ surface acoustic waves (SAW) as an
efficient actuation technology for both micromixing and micropumping [165]. In this
study, experimental and numerical investigations of an acoustic streaming generated in
sessile microdroplets by the Rayleigh SAWs were conducted. The main conclusions
deduced from this study are given below, followed by a recommendation for future
work.
9.1
Conclusions
A 3D numerical model of SAW acoustic streaming in microfluidic applications has
been developed. The acoustic streaming model has been calibrated using experimental
results, where a good agreement between the two results was obtained. The 3D model
which has been developed captures the physics behind the mechanism of different
streaming phenomena, such as the concentration of suspended particles by placing the
SAW driven microdroplet in an asymmetric position.
By introducing a new dimensionless acoustic force parameter of ÚÛ
⁄
in the
current study analysis for the SAW-induced streaming inside sessile droplets (1-30µl), it
has been possible for the first time to present qualitative and quantitative comparisons
between the experimental data and numerical simulation results. The results provide a
strong evidence of the existence of significant hydrodynamics nonlinearity in this
system, over a range of the values of ÚÛ . The results suggest that when ÚÛ â 0.01;
the full 3D Navier-Stokes equations must be applied in order to avoid errors during the
predictions of streaming velocities which could be as large as ~ 93%. Besides, droplet
deformation or movement has been observed when ÚÛ â 0.45. In brief, it has been
demonstrated that the hydrodynamic nonlinearity plays a significant role in most
noticeable SAW acoustic streaming of droplets actuation (e.g., Re ≥ 1).
137
The SAW attenuation length, lSAW, (a factor directly related to the SAW excitation
frequency and wavelength) has been identified as a parameter indicating the efficiency
of SAW-inducing convective mixing. A fast and effective mixing process is induced
until a SAW attenuation length, lSAW reaches a critical value, beyond which a significant
decrease in streaming velocity and mixing efficiency was observed. The magnitude of
streaming velocity, mixing rate and efficiency were determined by the droplet size to be
a highest when the ratio of the droplet radius to SAW attenuation length Rd /lSAW ≤ 1.0,
even at small SAW powers, such as 0.05 mW. In contrast, inhomogeneous mixtures
with slower mixing rates were obtained when Rd / lSAW
>> 1.0, due to the higher
attenuation rate of acoustic energy and minimisation of energy reaching the droplet free
surface. As a high power results in a significant heating effect, this means the critical
ratio
(Rd /lSAW ≤ 1) can be used as a guideline in the SAW device design for
microfluidic applications that include temperature sensitive biological samples inside
the microdroplet [141, 142].
Analysis from both the experimental and numerical results showed that, compared with
freestanding droplets, there is a significant scaling effect that influences the streaming
behaviour of flow hydrodynamics in the microdroplets confined between the two plates.
For example, a considerable decrease in characteristic streaming velocity has been
observed, when the gap height between the two plates, H, is < 100 µm. Thus, the ability
of using the SAW momentum to drive the fluids into confined spaces or microchannels
at smaller gap heights will be problematic, due to the increased wall shear gradient at
smaller gap heights [11]. Furthermore, it has been also observed that further increase in
the gab height above a higher critical value, will induce a decrease in the streaming
velocity. This critical value has been characterised by a new dimensionless ratio
between the gap height and penetration distance of the Rayleigh wave into the fluid,
which has been identified to be "⁄()*
9.2
#
ë 0.7.
Future Work
Although the acoustic streaming phenomena of sessile droplets at different design
parameters have been fully explored, the present 3D model is limited to the low power
regimes, where neither droplets deformation nor transportation by the actuation of the
Rayleigh wave was induced. There is also heating effects unconsidered, and during the
experiments it has been observed that the application of SAW at high power levels
138
induces heat generations and liquids evaporation. Therefore, future work should be
aimed at extend the investigations carried out during this project in the following
directions:
•
In order to study the droplets dynamics and particle formation at high RF powers
in 3D dimension, which has not been fully explored, a suitable two-phase model
that can capture the interface tension and distortions must be implemented in the
current streaming model, such as volume of fluid method (VOF) [166].
•
Whereas, the current available studies on heating effects inside droplet generated
by a Rayleigh wave are quite limited and based only on the experimental
observations [141, 167-169]. Besides, a mechanism of which this phenomenon
was generated has not been explored yet. Thus, the present 3D streaming model
could be extended to understand the physics behind a heat generation and
temperature increase inside the liquid droplet by a high power source of a
Rayleigh wave.
•
The devolved mixing model in this study was used successfully for the
characterisation of SAW mixing performance of two different species. The
mixing model could be extended to include the chemical reactions for LOC
systems, where the influences of the SAW streaming on the characteristics of
chemical species generation and reaction efficiency could be thoroughly
investigated.
However, SAW-based Microfluidics has drawn much attention for lab-on-chip research,
where many streaming phenomena are still under study and a 3D modeling has not been
fully provided. Future work can also be extended to streaming phenomenon generated
by the shear type surface acoustic wave [170], or that generated by a standing surface
acoustic wave [77].
139
References
[1] K. Chono, N. Shimizu, Y. Matsui, J. Kondoh, S. Shiokawa, Development of novel
atomization system based on SAW streaming, Jap. J. Appl. Phys, 43 (2004 ) 2987-2991.
[2] A. Sano, Y. Rlatsui, S. Shiokawa, A new manipulator based on surface acoustic
wave streaming, in: Ultrasonics Symposium, 1997. Proceedings., 1997 IEEE, Toronto,
Ont, 1997, pp. 467-470.
[3] A. Manz, N. Graber, H.M. Widmer, Miniaturized total chemical analysis systems: A
novel concept for chemical sensing, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 1 (1990) 244–
248.
[4] F. Zhang, B. Liu, W. Liu, Q. Zhang, DNA computing model based on lab-on-a-chip
and its application on solving the timetabling problem, Progress in Natural Science 18
(2008) 633-637.
[5] C. Zhang, D. Xing, Y. Li, Micropumps, microvalves, and micromixers within PCR
microfluidic chips: Advances and trends, Biotechnology Advances, 25 (2007) 483-514.
[6] S. Haeberle, R. Zengerle, Microfluidic platforms for lab-on-a-chip applications, Lab
on a chip, 7 (2007) 1094-1110.
[7] G.H.W. Sanders, A. Manz, Chip-based microsystems for genomic and proteomic
analysis, TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 19 (2000) 364-378.
[8] B.H. Weigl, R.L. Bardell, C.R. Cabrera, Lab-on-a-chip for drug development,
Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 55 (2003) 349-377.
[9] M.B. Elman, M. Sternheim, R. Rosen, S. Krylov, Y. Shacham, Towrds Toxity
Detection Using Lab-on-Chip Based on the Integration of MEMS and Whole-Cell
Sensors, Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 23 (2008 ).
[10] L.-J. Yang, T.-J. Yao, Y.-C. Tai, The marching velocity of the capillary meniscus
in a microchannel, J. Micromech. Microeng. , 14 (2004) 220–225.
[11] K. Kang, L.J. Lee, K.W. Koelling, High shear microfluidics and its application in
rheological measurement, Experiments in Fluids, 38 (2005) 222-232.
[12] K. Strobl, M.F. Schneider, A. Wixforth, Acoustic Mixing at Low Reynolds
Number, Applied Physics Letters, 88 (2006) 054102.
[13] K.A. Shaikh, K.S. Ryu, E.D. Goluch, J.-M. Nam, J. Liu, C.S. Thaxton, A modular
microfluidic architecture for integrated biochemical analysis, 102 (2005) 9745-9750.
[14] C.K. Fredrickson, Z.H. Fan, Macro-to-micro interfaces for microfluidic devices,
Lab on a chip, 4 (2004) 526-533.
140
[15] Y. Li, Y.Q. Fu, S.D. Brodie, M. Alghane, A.J. Walton, Integrated microfluidics
system using surface acoustic wave and electrowetting on dielectrics technology,
Biomicrofluidics, 6 (2012) 012812-012819.
[16] A. Wixforth, Acoustically driven planar microfluidics, Superlattices and
Microstructures, 33 (2003) 389–396.
[17] X.Y. Du, M.E. Swanwick, Y.Q. Fu, J.K. Luo, A.J. Flewitt, D.S. Lee, S. Maeng,
W.I. Milne, Surface acoustic wave induced streaming and pumping in 128° Y-cut
LiNbO3 for microfluidic applications Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering
19 (2009) 035016.
[18] C.J. Strobl, A. Rathgeber, A. Wixforth, C. Gauer, J. Scriba, Planar microfluidic
processors, in: Ultrasonics Symposium, 2002. Proceedings. 2002 IEEE, 2002, pp. 255258 vol.251.
[19] X.Y. Du, Y.Q. Fu, J.K. Luo, A.J. Flewitt, W.I. Milne, Microfluidic pumps
employing surface acoustic waves generated in ZnO thin films, Journal of Applied
Physics, 105 (2009) 024508-024508-024507.
[20] M.K. Tan, J.R. Friend, L.Y. Yeo, Interfacial Jetting Phenomena Induced by
Focused Surface Vibrations, Physical Review Letters, 103 (2009) 024501.
[21] A. Qi, L.Y. Yeo, J.R. Friend, Interfacial destabilization and atomization driven by
surface acoustic waves, Physics of Fluids, 20 (2008) 074103-074114.
[22] R.J. Shilton, L.Y. Yeo, J.R. Friend, Quantification of surface acoustic wave
induced chaotic mixing-flows in microfluidic wells, Sensors and Actuators B:
Chemical, 160 (2011) 1565-1572.
[23] L. Yeo, J.R. Friend, Ultrafast microfluidics using surface acoustic waves,
Biomicrofluidics, 3 (2009) 012002.
[24] P.R. Rogers, J.R. Friend, L.Y. Yeo, Exploitation of surface acoustic waves to drive
size-dependent microparticle concentration within a droplet, Lab on a chip, 10 (2010)
2979-2985.
[25] T. Frommelt, T.D. Gogel, M. Kostur, P. Talkner, P. Hanggi, Flow patterns and
transport in Rayleigh surface acoustic wave streaming, IEEE Transaction on Ultrasonics
55 (2008 ) 2298-2305.
[26] J.V. Atanasoff, P.J. Hart, Dynamical Determinitation of the Elastic Constants and
Their Temperature Coefficients for Quartz, Physical Review, 59 (1941) 85-96.
[27] S. Datta, Surface Acoustic Wave Devices, A Division of Simimon and
Schuster,Inc, New Jersy 1986
141
[28] M.J. Fernandez, J.L. Fotecha, I. Sayago, M. Aleixander, J. Lozano, Discrimination
of Volatile Copmounds Through an Electric Nose Based on Zno SAW Sensors, Sensors
and Actuators B, 127 (2007) 277-283.
[29] H. Li, J.R. Friend, L.Y. Yeo, A scaffold cell seeding method driven by surface
acoustic waves, Biomaterials, 28 (2007) 4098-4104.
[30] S.C. Terry, J.H. Jerman, J.B. Angell, A gas chromatographic air analyzer fabricated
on a silicon wafer, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, ED-26 (1979) 1880-1885.
[31] M.A. Burns, B.N. Johnson, S.N. Brahmasandra, K. Handique, J.R. Webster, M.
Krishnan, T.S. Sammarco, P.M. Man, D. Jones, D. Heldsinger, C.H. Mastrangelo, D.T.
Burke, An Integrated Nanoliter DNA Analysis Device, Science, 282 (1998) 484-487.
[32] George Karniadakis, Ali Beşkök, N.R. Aluru, Microflows And Nanoflows:
Fundamentals And Simulation in: S.S. Antman, J.E. Marsden, L. Sirovich (Eds.),
Springer Science+Business Media, Inc., New York, 2005.
[33] D.R. Reyes, D. Iossifidis, P.A. Auroux, A. Manz, Micro total analysis systems. 1.
Introduction, theory, and technology, Anal Chem., 74 (2002) 2623-2636.
[34] M. Tan, J. Friend, L. Yeo, Surface Acoustic Wave Driven Microchannel Flow, in:
Proc 16th Australasian Fluid Mech Conf, Gold Coast, Australia, 2007, pp. 790–793
[35] K. Sollier, C. Mandon, K. Heyries, L. Blum, C. Marquette, "Print-n-Shrink"
technology for the rapid production of microfluidic chips and protein microarrays, Lab
Chip, 9 (2009) 3489-3494.
[36] D.J. Laser, J.G. Santiago, A review of micropumps, Journal of Micromechanics
and Microengineering, 14 (2004) R35.
[37] A.A. Oliner, Acoustic surface waves, in: Topics in applied physics SpringerVerlag, New York, 1978.
[38] D.S. Ballantine, R.M. White, S.J. Martin, A.J. Ricco, E.T. Zellers, G.C. Frye, H.
Wohltjen, Acoustic Wave Sensors: Theory, Design, and Physico-Chemical Applications
in: M. Levy, R. Stern (Eds.), Academic Press, 1997.
[39] D. Royer, E. Dieulesaint, Elastic Waves in Solids I: Free and Guided Propagation
(Advanced Texts in Physics), Springer, 2000.
[40] J.W. Gardner, V.K. Varadan, O.O. Awadelkarim, Microsensors, MEMS and Smart
Devices, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York, 2001.
[41] S. Shiokawa, Y. Matsui, T. Ueda, Study on acoustic streaming and its application
to fluid devices, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics 29 (1990 ) 137-139.
[42] L. Rayleigh, On Waves Propagated along the Plane Surface of an Elastic Solid,
Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, s1-17 (1885) 4-11.
142
[43] A. Müller, A. Darga, A. Wixforth, Surface Acoustic Wave Studies for Chemical
and Biological Sensors
Nanoscale Devices - Fundamentals and Applications, in: R. Gross, A. Sidorenko, L.
Tagirov (Eds.), Springer Netherlands, 2006, pp. 3-13.
[44] P.J. Feenstra, Modeling and control of surface acoustic wave motors, University of
Twente [Host], Enschede, 2005.
[45] J. David, N. Cheeke, , Fundamentals and Applications of Ultrasonic Waves
CRC Press LLC., Florida, 2002.
[46] S.K.R.S. Sankaranarayanan, V.R. Bhethanabotla, Design of efficient focused
surface acoustic wave devices for potential microfluidic applications, Journal of
Applied Physics, 103 (2008) 064518-064518-064517.
[47] J. Berthier, Microdrops and Digital Microfluidic, William Andrew Inc., Norwich,
USA, 2008.
[48] S.K.R.S. Sankaranarayanan, S. Cular, V.R. Bhethanabotla, B. Joseph, Flow
induced by acoustic streaming on surface-acoustic-wave devices and its application in
biofouling removal: A computational study and comparisons to experiment, Physical
Review E, 77 (2008) 066308.
[49] J. Friend, L.Y. Yeo, Microscale acoustofluidics: Microfluidics driven via acoustics
and ultrasonics, Reviews of Modern Physics, 83 (2011) 647-704.
[50] K. Dransfeld, E. Salzmann, Excitation, detection and attenuation of high-frequency
elastic surface waves, in: W.P. Mason, R.N. Thurston (Eds.) Physical Acoustics,
Academic press, New York, 1970, pp. 219-272.
[51] J.D.N. Cheeke, P. Morisseau, Attenuation of Rayleigh waves on a LiNbO3 crystal
in contact with a liquid4He bath, J Low Temp Phys, 46 (1982) 319-330.
[52] S. Shiokawa, Y. Matsui, T. Moriizumi, Experimental Study on Liquid Streaming
by SAW Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 28 (1989) 126-128.
[53] R.M. Arzt, E. Salzmann, K. Dransfeld, ELASTIC SURFACE WAVES IN
QUARTZ AT 316 MHz Appl. Phys. Lett., 10 (1967) 165-167.
[54] W.L. Nyborg, Acoustic streaming, in: e. W.P Mason (Ed.) Physical Acoustics,
Academic press, 1965 pp. 265-331.
[55] J. Lighthill, Acoustic streaming J. Sound Vib, 61 (1978 ) 391-418.
[56] J. Lighthill, Internal waves in fluids, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,
1978.
[57] M.k. Tan, J.R. Friend, L.Y. Yeo, Surface Acoustic Wave Driven Microchannel
Flow, in, ScienceDirect, Crown Plaza,Gold Coast,Australi 2007.
143
[58] K. Sritharan, C.J. Strobl, M.F. Schneider, A. Wixforth, Z. Guttenberg, Acoustic
mixing at low Reynold's numbers, Applied Physics Letters, 88 (2006) 054102-054103.
[59] T. Uchida, T. Suzukki, T. Shiokawa, Investigation of Acoustic Streaming Excited
by Surface Acoustic Waves, IEEE Ultrasonic Symposium, 2 (1995) 1081-1084.
[60] S. Shiokawa, Y. Matsui, T. Ueda, Liquid streaming and droplet formation caused
by leaky Rayleigh waves, Ultrasonics Symposium Proceedings, 1 (1989) 643-646.
[61] A. Renaudin, P. Tabourier, V. Zhang, J.C. Camart, C. Druon, SAW nanopump for
handling droplets in view of biological applications, Sensors and Actuators B:
Chemical, 113 (2006) 389-397.
[62] M. Alghane, Y.Q. Fu, B.X. Chen, Y. Li, M.P.Y. Desmulliez, A.J. Walton,
Streaming phenomena in microdroplets induced by Rayleigh surface acoustic wave,
Journal of Applied Physics, 109 (2011) 114901-114908.
[63] K. Kulkarni, J. Friend, L. Yeo, P. Perlmutter, Surface acoustic waves as an energy
source for drop scale synthetic chemistry, Lab on a chip, 9 (2009) 754-755.
[64] T. Frommelt, M. Kostur, S. Wenzel, auml, M. fer, P. Talkner, auml, P. nggi, A.
Wixforth, Microfluidic Mixing via Acoustically Driven Chaotic Advection, Physical
Review Letters, 100 (2008) 034502.
[65] M. Maezawa, R. Kamada, T. Suda, T. Kamakura, Liquid Mixing using Streaming
in Frequency-Modulated Ultrasonic Beams Radiated from SAW Devices, in:
Proceedings of 20th International Congress on Acoustics, Sydney, Australia, 2010.
[66] W. Tseng, J. Lin, W. Sung, S. Chen, G. Lee, Active micro-mixers using surface
acoustic waves on Y-cut 128 LiNbO3, J. Micromech. Microeng 16 (2006 ) 539-548.
[67] Q. Zeng, F. Guo, L. Yao, H.W. Zhu, L. Zheng, Z.X. Guo, W. Liu, Y. Chen, S.S.
Guo, X.Z. Zhao, Milliseconds mixing in microfluidic channel using focused surface
acoustic wave, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 160 (2011) 1552-1556.
[68] H. Li, J. Friend, L. Yeo, Surface acoustic wave concentration of particle and
bioparticle suspensions, Biomedical Microdevices, 9 (2007) 647-656.
[69] R. Shilton, M.K. Tan, L.Y. Yeo, J.R. Friend, Particle concentration and mixing in
microdrops driven by focused surface acoustic waves, Journal of Applied Physics, 104
(2008) 014910-014911-014919.
[70] R. Raghavan, J. Friend, L. Yeo, Particle concentration via acoustically driven
microcentrifugation: microPIV flow visualization and numerical modelling studies,
Microfluidics and Nanofluidics, 8 (2010) 73-84.
[71] A. Zhang, W. Liu, Z. Jiang, J. Fei, Rapid concentration of particle and bioparticle
suspension based on surface acoustic wave, Applied Acoustics, 70 (2009) 1137-1142.
144
[72] R. Wilson, J. Reboud, Y. Bourquin, S. Neale, Y. Zhang, J. Cooper, Phononic
crystal structures for acoustically driven microfluidic manipulations, Lab on a chip, 11
(2011) 323-328.
[73] J. Shi, X. Mao, D. Ahmed, A. Colletti, T.J. Huang, Focusing microparticles in a
microfluidic channel with standing surface acoustic waves (SSAW), Lab on a chip, 8
(2008) 221-223.
[74] T. Kamakura, K. Matsuda, Y. Kumamoto, M.A. Breazeale, Acoustic streaming
induced in focused Gaussian beams, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,
97 (1995) 2740-2746.
[75] J. Shi, H. Huang, Z. Stratton, Y. Huang, T.J. Huang, Continuous particle separation
in a microfluidic channel via standing surface acoustic waves (SSAW), Lab on a chip, 9
(2009) 3354-3359.
[76] J. Shi, D. Ahmed, X. Mao, S.-C.S. Lin, A. Lawit, T.J. Huang, Acoustic tweezers:
patterning cells and microparticles using standing surface acoustic waves (SSAW), Lab
on a chip, 9 (2009) 2890-2895.
[77] L. Meng, F. Cai, Z. Zhang, L. Niu, Q. Jin, F. Yan, J. Wu, Z. Wang, H. Zheng,
Transportation of single cell and microbubbles by phase-shift introduced to standing
leaky surface acoustic waves, Biomicrofluidics, 5 (2011) 44104-4410410.
[78] X. Ding, J. Shi, S.-C.S. Lin, S. Yazdi, B. Kiraly, T.J. Huang, Tunable patterning of
microparticles and cells using standing surface acoustic waves, Lab on a chip, 12 (2012)
2491-2497.
[79] L. Meng, F. Cai, J. Chen, L. Niu, Y. Li, J. Wu, H. Zheng, Precise and
programmable manipulation of microbubbles by two-dimensional standing surface
acoustic waves, Applied Physics Letters, 100 (2012) 173701-173701-173704.
[80] D. Beyssen, L. Le Brizoual, O. Elmazria, P. Alnot, Microfluidic device based on
surface acoustic wave, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 118 (2006) 380-385.
[81] J.K. Luo, Y.Q. Fu, Y. Li, X.Y. Du, A.J. Flewitt, A. Walton, W.I. Milne, Movingpart-free microfluidic systems for lab-on-a-chip, Journal of Micromechanics and
Microengineering, 19 (2009) 054001.
[82]
S.
Girardo,
M.
Cecchini,
F.
Beltram,
R.
Cingolani,
D.
Pisignano,
Polydimethylsiloxane-LiNbO3 surface acoustic wave micropump devices for fluid
control into microchannels, Lab on a chip, 8 (2008) 1557-1563.
[83] M. Cecchini, S. Girardo, D. Pisignano, R. Cingolani, F. Beltram, Acousticcounterflow microfluidics by surface acoustic waves, Applied Physics Letters, 92
(2008) 104103-104103-104103.
145
[84] L. Masini, M. Cecchini, S. Girardo, R. Cingolani, D. Pisignano, F. Beltram,
Surface-acoustic-wave counterflow micropumps for on-chip liquid motion control in
two-dimensional microchannel arrays, Lab on a chip, 10 (2010) 1997-2000.
[85] S. Shiokawa, Y. Matsui, T. Ueda, Study on SAW Streaming and its Application to
Fluid Devices, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 29S1 (1990) 137-139.
[86] S. Shiokawa, Y. Matsui, T. Ueda, Liquid streaming and droplet formation caused
by leaky Rayleigh waves, in: Ultrasonics Symposium, 1989. Proceedings., IEEE
Montreal, Que, 1989, pp. 643-646
[87] J. Bennes, S. Alzuaga, S. Ballandras, F. Cherioux, F. Bastien, J.F. Manceau,
Droplet ejector using surface acoustic waves, in: Ultrasonics Symposium, 2005 IEEE,
2005, pp. 823-826.
[88] M. Kurosawa, T. Watanabe, A. Futami, T. Higuchi, Surface acoustic wave
atomizer, Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 50 (1995) 69-74.
[89] J. Ju, Y. Yamagata, H. Ohmori, T. Higuchi, High-frequency surface acoustic wave
atomizer, Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 145–146 (2008) 437-441.
[90] M. Alvarez, J. Friend, L. Yeo, Surface vibration induced spatial ordering of
periodic polymer patterns on a substrate, Langmuir, 24 (2008) 10629-10632.
[91] J. Friend, L. Yeo, D. Arifin, A. Mechler, Evaporative self-assembly assisted
synthesis of polymeric nanoparticles by surface acoustic wave atomization,
Nanotechnology, 19 (2008) 145301.
[92] A. Qi, L. Yeo, J. Friend, J. Ho, The extraction of liquid, protein molecules and
yeast cells from paper through surface acoustic wave atomization, Lab on a chip, 10
(2010) 470-476.
[93] T.A. Franke, A. Wixforth Microfluidics for Miniaturized Laboratories on a Chip,
ChemPhysChem, 9 (2008) 2140–2156.
[94] H. Antil, A. Gantner, R.H.W. Hoppe, D. K¨oster, K. Siebert, A. Wixforth,
Modeling and Simulation of Piezoelectrically Agitated Acoustic Streaming of
Microfluidic Biochips, Licture Notes in Computation Science, 60 (2008) 305-312.
[95] D. Köster, Numerical Simulation of Acoustic Streaming on Surface Acoustic
Wave-driven Biochips SIAM J. on Scientific Computing, 29 (2007).
[96] R.G. Harbir Antil, Ronald H.W. Hoppe, Christopher Linsenmann, Tsorng-Whay
Pan, Achim Wixforth, MODELING, SIMULATION, AND OPTIMIZATION OF
SURFACE ACOUSTIC WAVE DRIVEN MICROFLUIDIC BIOCHIPS, Journal of
Computational Mathematics, 28 (2010) 149-169.
146
[97] W.L. Nyborg, Acoustic streaming, in: M.F. Hamilton (Ed.) Nonlinear acoustics,
Academic Press, New York, 1998, pp. 207-331.
[98] C.E. Bradley, Acoustic streaming field structure: The influence of the radiator, The
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 100 (1996) 1399-1408.
[99] W.L. Nyborg, Acoustic Streaming due to Attenuated Plane Waves, The Journal of
the Acoustical Society of America, 25 (1953) 68-75.
[100] W.L. Nyborg, Acoustic Streaming near a Boundary, The Journal of the Acoustical
Society of America, 30 (1958) 329-339.
[101] M.K. Tan, L.Y. Yeo, J.R. Friend, Rapid fluid flow and mixing induced in
microchannels using surface acoustic waves, EPL (Europhysics Letters), 87 (2009)
47003.
[102] M. Schindler, P. Talkner, M. Kostur, P. Hänggi, Accumulating particles at the
boundaries of a laminar flow, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications,
385 (2007) 46-58.
[103] S.K.R.S. Sankaranarayanan, R. Singh, V.R. Bhethanabotla, Acoustic streaming
induced elimination of nonspecifically bound proteins from a surface acoustic wave
biosensor: Mechanism prediction using fluid-structure interaction models, Journal of
Applied Physics, 108 (2010) 104507-104511.
[104] M.K. Tan, J.R. Friend, O.K. Matar, L.Y. Yeo, Capillary wave motion excited by
high frequency surface acoustic waves, Physics of Fluids, 22 (2010) 112112-112122.
[105] M. Schindler, P. Talkner, P. Hanggi, Computing stationary free-surface shapes in
microfluidics, Physics of Fluids, 18 (2006) 103303-103316.
[106] D. Koster, Numerical Simulation of Acoustic Streaming on Surface Acoustic
Wave-Driven Biochips, SIAM J SCI, 6 (2007) 2352-2380.
[107] A. Huerta, W.K. Liu, Viscous flow with large free surface motion, Computer
Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 69 (1988) 277-324.
[108] ANSYS, [online] available at http://www.ansys.com/products/cfx.asp, (accessed
on December 2008).
[109] ANSYS, online] available at http://www.fluent.com/software/fluent/index.htm,
(accessed December 2008).
[110] ANSYS, [online] availabe at http://www.ansys.com/products/multiphysics.asp,
(accessed December 2008).
[111] FLOW-3D, [online] available at http://www.flow3d.com/, (accessed January
2009).
147
[112] COMSOL, [online] availabe at http://www.euro.comsol.com/, (accessed January
2009).
[113] MFiX, [online] available at https://mfix.netl.doe.gov/index.php, (accessed January
2009).
[114] OpenFVM, [online] availabe at http://openfvm.sourceforge.net/, (accessed
January 2009).
[115] Elmer, [online] available at
http://www.ann.jussieu.fr/~lehyaric/stats/link.php?from=http:%2f%2fwww.ann.jussieu.
fr%2ffree.htm&to=http:%2f%2fwww.csc.fi%2felmer%2f&subject=Elmer&version=07
0702 (accessed january 2009).
[116] OpenFOAM, [online] available at
http://www.ann.jussieu.fr/~lehyaric/stats/link.php?from=http:%2f%2fwww.ann.jussieu.
fr%2ffree.htm&to=http:%2f%2fwww.opencfd.co.uk%2fopenfoam%2f&subject=OpenF
OAM&version=070702, (accessed January 2009).
[117] OOFEM, [online] available at http://www.oofem.org/en/oofem.html, (accessed
January 2009).
[118] M.K. Kurosawa, State-of-the-art surface acoustic wave linear motor and its future
applications, Ultrasonics 38 (2000) 15-19.
[119] M.K.B. M. I. Newton, T. K. H. Starke, S. M. Bowan, G. McHale, Sensor &
Actuat, 76 (1999) 89.
[120] L. Rayleigh, On the Circulation of Air Observed in Kundt's Tubes, and on Some
Allied Acoustical Problems, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of
London, 175 (1884) 1-21.
[121] OpenFOAM user guide, in, OpenCFD Ltd, 2008.
[122] H. Mitome, The mechanism of generation of acoustic streaming, Electronics and
Communications in Japan (Part III: Fundamental Electronic Science), 81 (1998) 1-8.
[123] S.K.R.S. Sankaranarayanan, V.R. Bhethanabotla, Numerical analysis of wave
generation and propagation in a focused surface acoustic wave device for potential
microfluidics applications, IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control., 56 (2009)
631-643.
[124] T. Uchida, T. Suzuki, S. Shiokawa, Investigation of acoustic streaming excited by
surface acoustic wave, IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium 2 (1995 ) 1081-1084.
[125] T. Franke, A.R. Abate, D.A. Weizt, A. Wixforth, Surface acoustic wave (SAW)
directed droplet flow in microfluidics for PDMS devices, Lab on a chip 9 ( 2009 ) 26252627.
148
[126] K. Matsuda, T. Kamakura , Y. Kumamoto, Acoustic streaming by a focused
sound source, in: H. Hobxk (Ed.) Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on
Nonlinear Acoustics, World Scientific, Bergen, 1993, pp. 595–600.
[127] J.C. Campbell, W.R. Jones, A method for estimating optimal crystal cuts and
propagation direction for excitation of piezoelectric surface waves, IEEE Transactions
on sonic and ultrasonics 15 (1968) 209
[128] J.C. Campbell, W.R. Jones, propagation of surface waves at the boundary
between a piezoelectric crystal and a fluid medium, IEEE Transactions on sonic and
ultrasonics 17 (1970) 71-76.
[129] S.V. Patankar, Numerical heat transfer and fluid flow, Hemisphere Publishing
Corporation, New York, 1980.
[130] H.K. Versteeg, W. Malalasekera, An Introduction to Computational Fluid
Dynamics; The Finite Volume Method longman Group Ltd, London, 1995.
[131] S. Oberti, A. Neild, R. Quach, J. Dual, The use of acoustic radiation forces to
position particles within fluid droplets, Ultrasonics, 49 (2009) 47-52.
[132] J. Friend, H. Li, L. Yeo, Surface Acoustic Wave Concentration of Microparticle
and Nanoparticle Suspensions, in: Proc 16th Australasian Fluid Mech Conf., Gold
Coast, Australia, 2008, pp. 1038–1041.
[133] G.K. Batchelor, NOTE ON A CLASS OF SOLUTIONS OF THE NAVIERSTOKES
EQUATIONS
REPRESENTING
STEADY
ROTATIONALLY-
SYMMETRIC FLOW, in, Oxford University Press, 1951.
[134] L.Y. Yeo, J.R. Friend, D.R. Arifin, Electric tempest in a teacup: The tea leaf
analogy to microfluidic blood plasma separation, Applied Physics Letters, 89 (2006)
103516-103513.
[135] D.R. Arifin, L.Y. Yeo, J.R. Friend, Microfluidic blood plasma separation via bulk
electrohydrodynamic flows, Biomicrofluidics, 1 (2007) 014103-014113.
[136] A. Einstein, Die Ursache der Mäanderbildung der Flußläufe und des sogenannten
Baerschen Gesetzes, Naturwissenschaften, 14 (1926) 223-224.
[137] A. Tandon, J. Marshall, Einstein's Tea Leaves and Pressure Systems in the
Atmosphere, The Physics Teacher, 48 (2010) 292-295.
[138] R.M. Moroney, R.M. White, R.T. Howe, Microtransport induced by ultrasonic
Lamb waves, Applied Physics Letters, 59 (1991) 774-776.
[139] M.W. Thompson, A.A. Atchley, M.J. Maccarone, Influences of a temperature
gradient and fluid inertia on acoustic streaming in a standing wave, The Journal of the
Acoustical Society of America, 117 (2005) 1839-1849.
149
[140] M. Alghane, B.X. Chen, Y.Q. Fu, Y. Li, J.K. Luo, A.J. Walton, Experimental and
numerical investigation of acoustic streaming excited by using a surface acoustic wave
device on a 128° YX-LiNbO 3 substrate, Journal of Micromechanics and
Microengineering, 21 (2011) 015005.
[141] J. Kondoh, N. Shimizu, Y. Matsui, M. Sugimoto, S. Shiokawa, Temperaturecontrol system for small droplet using surface acoustic wave device, in: Sensors, 2005
IEEE, Irvine, CA, 2005, pp. 4 pp.
[142] T.-D. Luong, V.-N. Phan, N.-T. Nguyen, High-throughput micromixers based on
acoustic streaming induced by surface acoustic wave, Microfluidics and Nanofluidics,
10 (2011) 619-625.
[143] P. Brunet, M. Baudoin, O.B. Matar, F. Zoueshtiagh, Droplet displacements and
oscillations induced by ultrasonic surface acoustic waves: A quantitative study, Physical
Review E, 81 (2010) 036315.
[144] N.I. Newton, M.K. Banerjee, T.K.H. Starke, S.M. Bowan, G. McHale, Surface
acoustic wave-liquid drop interactions, Sensors & Actuators, 76 ( 1999 ) 89-92.
[145] Y.Q. Fu, J.K. Luo, X. Du, A.J. Flewitt, Y. Li, A. Walton, W.I. Milne, Recent
developments in ZnO films for acoustic wave based bio-sensing and microfluidic
applications, Sens. Actuat. B., 143 (2010) 606-619.
[146] X.Y. Du, M.E. Swanwick, Y.Q. Fu, J.K. Luo, A.J. Flewitt, D.S. Lee, S. Maeng,
W.I. Milne, Surface acoustic wave induced streaming and pumping in 128° Y-cut
LiNbO
3
for
microfluidic
applications,
Journal
of
Micromechanics
and
Microengineering, 19 (2009) 035016.
[147] A. Wixforth, Acoustically Driven Programmable Microfluidics for Biological and
Chemical Applications, J. Assoc. Lab. Autom, 11 (2006) 399-405
[148] A. Wixforth, C. Strobl, C. Gaue, A. Toegl, C. Scriba, Z.V. Guttenberg, Acoustic
Manipolation of Small Droplets, Anal. Bional. Chem., (2004) 982-991.
[149] R.M. Arzt, E. Salzmann, K. Dransfeld, ELASTIC SURFACE WAVES IN
QUARTZ AT 316 MHz Appl. Phys. Lett. , 10 (1967) 165-167.
[150] M.K. Tan, L.L. Yeo, J.R. Friend, Inducing rapid fluid flows in microchannels
with surface acoustic waves, in:
Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS), 2009 IEEE
International, 2009, pp. 609-612.
[151] M.K. Tan, L.Y. Yeo, J.R. Friend, Unique flow transitions and particle collection
switching phenomena in a microchannel induced by surface acoustic waves, Applied
Physics Letters, 97 (2010) 234106-234103.
150
[152] A. Gantner, R.H.W. Hoppe, D. Köster, K. Siebert, A. Wixforth, Numerical
simulation of piezoelectrically agitated surface acoustic waves on microfluidic biochips,
Comput. Vis. Sci., 10 (2007) 145-161.
[153] L. Schmid, A. Wixforth, D. Weitz, T. Franke, Novel surface acoustic wave
(SAW)-driven closed PDMS flow chamber, Microfluidics and Nanofluidics, 12 (2011)
1-7.
[154] H.h. Gu, S.y. Zhang, L.p. Cheng, D. Ma, F.m. Zhou, Z.j. Chen, X.j. Shui, Study
on non-contact linear motors driven by surface acoustic waves Sensors & Actuators: A,
155 (2009) 163-167.
[155] L. Tzong-Shyng, S. Horng-Jiann, New pumping mechanism by surface waves in a
microchannel, in: Nano/Micro Engineered and Molecular Systems, 2009. NEMS 2009.
4th IEEE International Conference on, 2009, pp. 747-750.
[156] N. Nam-Trung, R.M. White, Acoustic streaming in micromachined flexural plate
wave devices: numerical simulation and experimental verification, Ultrasonics,
Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, IEEE Transactions on, 47 (2000) 1463-1471.
[157] N.T. Nguyen, R.M. White, Design and optimization of an ultrasonic flexural plate
wave micropump using numerical simulation, Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 77
(1999) 229-236.
[158] T. Min-Chien, L. Tzong-Shyng, The Study of Flexible Plate Wave Device for
Micro Pumping System, in: Nano/Micro Engineered and Molecular Systems, 2007.
NEMS '07. 2nd IEEE International Conference on, 2007, pp. 452-457.
[159] H. Guo, H. Sun, P.-T. Sah, Theoretical study of acoustic streaming induced
cooling effect in the microscale, IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium
Proceedings, (2008) 934-937.
[160] Q. Weilin, G. Mohiuddin Mala, L. Dongqing, Pressure-driven water flows in
trapezoidal silicon microchannels, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 43
(2000) 353-364.
[161] W. Achim, Acoustically Driven Programmable Microfluidics for Biological and
Chemical Applications, j.jala, 11 (2006) 399-405.
[162] F. Josse, F. Bender, R.W. Cernosek, Guided Shear Horizontal Surface Acoustic
Wave Sensors for Chemical and Biochemical Detection in Liquids, Analytical
Chemistry, 73 (2001) 5937-5944.
[163] J K Luo, Y Q Fu, Y Li, X Y Du, A J Flewitt, A J Walton, W.I. Milne, Movingpart-free microfluidic systems for lab-on-a-chip, J. Micromech. Microeng, 19 (2009)
054001.
151
[164] V. Singhal, S.V. Garimella, J.Y. Murthy, Low Reynolds number flow through
nozzle-diffuser elements in valveless micropumps, Sensors and Actuators A: Physical,
113 (2004) 226-235.
[165] N.S. K. Chono, Y. Matsu, J. Kondoh, S. Shiokawa, Jap. J. Appl. Phys. 43 (2004)
2987.
[166] J.P. Wang, A.G.L. Borthwick, R.E. Taylor, Finite-volume-type VOF method on
dynamically adaptive quadtree grids, International Journal for Numerical Methods in
Fluids, 45 (2004) 485-508.
[167] J. Kondoh, N. Shimizu, Y. Matsui, M. Sugimoto, S. Shiokawa, Development of
temperature-control system for liquid droplet using surface Acoustic wave devices,
Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 149 (2009) 292-297.
[168] D. Beyssen, L. Le Brizoual, O. Elmazria, P. Alnot, I. Perry, D. Maillet, 6I-2
Droplet Heating System Based on SAW/Liquid Interaction, in:
Ultrasonics
Symposium, 2006. IEEE, 2006, pp. 949-952.
[169] I. Shihoko, S. Mitsunori, M. Yoshikazu, K. Jun, Study of Surface Acoustic Wave
Streaming Phenomenon Based on Temperature Measurement and Observation of
Streaming in Liquids,Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 46 (2007) 4718-4722.
[170] D.S. Brodie, Y.Q.F. Fu, Y. Li , M. Alghane , R.L. Reuben, A.J. Walton Shear
horizontal surface acoustic wave induced microfluidic flow, Appl. Phys. Lett., 99
(2011) 153704
152