IQTISHODUNA: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam 13, no. 1 (April 1, 2024): 385-396
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54471/iqtishoduna.v13i1.2342
E-ISSN: 2443-0056, P-ISSN: 2252-5661
Accredited Sinta 2 Number 148/M/KPT/2020
The Role of Operational Efficiency on Islamic Commercial Banks
Faqih Nabhan 1* , Ayu Widyaningsih 2
1
Department of Sharia Business Management, Faculty of Islamic Economics and Business,
Institut Agama Islam Negeri Salatiga, Indonesia
2
Islamic Economic Society (MES) Salatiga City, Department of Studies, Training and Education,
Indonesia
* Corresponding author: faqihnabhan@uinsalatiga.ac.id
Article history: Received May 21, 2023 | Revised July 9, 2023 | Accepted 17 February, 2024 | Available online on April 1, 2024
To cite this article [Turabian of style 8th edition]: Nabhan, Faqih, and Ayu Widyaningsih. “The Role of Operational
Efficiency on Islamic Commercial Banks”. IQTISHODUNA: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam 13, no. 1 (April 1, 2024): 385-396.
Accessed April 1, 2024.
ABSTRACT
The study aims to analyze the effect of Fee-Based Income (non-interest income) and the Capital
Adequacy Ratio on Profitability with an Efficiency bank as an intervening variable. The research
object was a Sharia commercial bank registered in OJK from 2010 to 2019 with a sample of 11
banks. This type of research is quantitative research. Sampling was carried out by the purposive
sampling method. The analysis tool used is multiple linear regression and analysis path (path
analysis) using SPSS version 21 software. The study showed a positive and significant influence
on Fee-Based Income and profitability. While the Fee-Based Income has a substantial effect on
the operational efficiency ratio (OER), and the Capital Adequacy Ratio has a negative and
significant effect on OER. The results of the path analysis showed that the bank efficiency (OER)
was unable to mediate the influence of fee-based income on profitability but was able to
negotiate the impact of the capital adequacy ratio on profitability in Islamic commercial banks
from 2010 to 2019.
Keywords: fee-based income, capital adequacy ratio, profitability, bank efficiency
INTRODUCTION
Fee-based income, or non-interest income in banking, has become a
concern of many researchers. Fee-based income is an essential source of income
that can support the success of banking1,2. Furthermore, the researchers also pay
attention to fee-based income on banks' efficiency. In obtaining fee-based income,
1 Philip Segun Olowolaju, “Effect of Non-Interest Income on Profitability of Deposit Money
Banks in Nigeria,” Journal of Banking and Financial Dynamics 2 (2018): 1–8,
https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.525.2018.21.1.8.
2 M Mostak Ahamed, “Asset Quality , Non-Interest Income , And Bank Profitability :
Evidence
From
Indian
Banks,”
Economic
Modelling
63
(2017):
1–14,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2017.01.016.
|
© 2024, the author(s) Published by LP3M-IAI Syarifuddin. This is an open access article under the CC BY 4.0 license 385
IQTISHODUNA: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam
Volume 13 Issue 1, April 2024
ISSN (Print): 2252-5661, ISSN (Online): 2443-0056
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54471/iqtishoduna.v13i1.2342
it is necessary to develop an efficient infrastructure. This banking efficiency plays
a vital role in supporting profitability.3,4,5
Banking has the opportunity to increase profitability from fee-based
income.6 In the view of banking diversification, fee-based income or non-interest
income can encourage bank efficiency.7 However, there are differences in the
research results on the effect of fee-based or non-interest income on profitability.
Sun et al. and Lisnawati found that high fee-based income (non-interest income)
could not increase bank profitability8,9. This is because the increase in revenue
derived from fee-based income has not been able to cover the costs incurred to
obtain fee-based income. The high price of infrastructure that banks must pay to
receive fee-based income is one of the causes of the high costs. Based on this
research gap, this research was conducted. This research will answer fee-based
income so that it can increase banking profitability.
Based on the perspective of efficiency theory, in the long term, the output
of activity fluctuates in producing efficiency.10 Banks can achieve efficiency at
certain stages, but it is not necessarily the case at other stages. As a business
entity, banks are very interested in achieving efficiency.11 The operational
efficiency ratio in banking can be measured by the OER (ratio of operating costs
3 Gwahula Raphael, “Bank-Specific , Industry-Specific And Macroeconomic Determinants
Of Bank Efficiency In Tanzania : A Two Stage Analysis.,” European Journal of Business and
Management 5, no. 2 (2013): 142–55.
4 Anh-Tuan Doan, Kun-Li Lin, and Shuh-Chyi Doong, “What Drives Bank Efficiency? The
Interaction Of Bank Income Diversification And Ownership,” International Review of Economics
and Finance, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2017.07.019.
5 Abayomi Oredegbe, “Cost Efficiency Determinants : Evidence from the Canadian Banking
Industry,” International Journal of Business and Management 15, no. 1 (2020): 86–98,
https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v15n1p86.
6 Ming-lu Wu, “Examining the Internal Determinants of Profitability of Commercial Banks
in China: A Panel Data Modeling Based Empirical Study,” International Journal of Managerial
Studies and Research 8, no. 3 (2020): 1–12, https://doi.org/10.20431/2349-0349.0803001.
7 Thi Lam Anh Nguyen, “Diversification and Bank Efficiency in Six ASEAN Countries,”
Global
Finance
Journal
Journal
37,
no.
September
2017
(2018):
57–78,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2018.04.004.
8 Lisna Lisnawati, “Pengaruh Intellectual Capital Dan Non Interest Income Terhadap
Kesehatan Bank Syariah Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2015-2019,” International
Journal of Accounting, Taxation, and Business 1, no. 1 (2020): 45–67.
9 “Non Interest Income and Performance of Commercial Banking in China,” Hindawi
Scientific Programming 2017 (2017): 1–8.
10 Gatien Verley et al., “Universal Theory of Efficiency Fluctuations,” Physical Review E Statistical,
Nonlinear,
and
Soft
Matter
Physics
90,
no.
5
(2014):
1–10,
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.90.052145.
11 Hendrawan Raharjo, Anita Wijayanti, and Riana R Dewi, “Analisis Pengaruh Kinerja
Keuangan Dan Inflasi Terhadap Profitabilitas Bank Umum Syariah Di Indonesia (Tahun 20142018),” Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Dan Manajemen (JIAM) 16, no. 1 (2020): 15–26.
386
| © 2024, the author(s) Published by LP3M-IAI Syarifuddin. This is an open access article under the CC BY 4.0 license
Faqih Nabhan et al.; The Role of Operational Efficiency
to operating income).12 Fee-based income that can increase efficiency is expected
to increase profitability.13,14,15,16
Based on the report from the Financial Services Authority (OJK) (2021), the
operational efficiency ratio of banking in Indonesia from 2016 to early 2019
experienced a reasonably high increase. However, from mid-2019 to 2021, there
was a significant decline in the operational efficiency ratio for both conventional
and Islamic commercial banks. This condition occurs due to the COVID-19
pandemic, which has weakened the performance of banks, thereby reducing the
profits banks earn. This research was conducted on 14 Islamic commercial banks
for the period 2010 to the end of 2019. Islamic commercial banks were chosen as
the object of study because even though the number of assets was still small
compared to commercial banks and, in 2019, it experienced a decline, this decline
still showed positive and positive results. Conditions are still better than other
commercial banks.17
This study explores the effect of fee-based (non-interest) income in
increasing bank profitability. Banks that are successful in managing fee-based
income so that they can create efficiency can increase profitability. The capital
adequacy ratio (CAR) is the other component that affects profitability. Research
by Saif-alyousfi et al., and Margono et al., states that a large CAR illustrates the
more robust capital owned by banks. A high CAR value will further support the
achievement of bank profitability targets.18,19
Fee-based income, or non-interest income in banking, has been a concern
for many researchers. Fee-based revenue is an important source of revenue that
can support banking success. In addition, researchers also pay attention to the
effect of fee-based income on bank efficiency. To obtain cost-based revenue,
Nardi Sunardi, “Pengaruh Intellectual Capital ( Ib-Vaic Tm ), FDR Dan CAR Terhadap
Efisiensi Biaya Dan Implikasinya Pada Kinerja Perusahaan Bank Umum Syariah Indonesia,”
Jurnal Sekuritas Manajemen Keuangan 1, no. 1 (2017): 1–17.
13 Ahamed, “Asset Quality , Non-Interest Income , And Bank Profitability : Evidence From
Indian Banks.”
14 Wu, “Examining the Internal Determinants of Profitability of Commercial Banks in China:
A Panel Data Modeling Based Empirical Study.”
15 Nguyen, “Diversification and Bank Efficiency in Six ASEAN Countries.”
16 Harjum Muharam and Bianda Bellinda, “Diversifikasi Pendapatan, Kinerja Bank, Dan
Peran Moderasi Tipe Kepemilikan,” Jurnal Bisnis Strategi 29, no. 1 (2020).
17 Ihsan Effendi and Prawidya Hariani RS, “Dampak Covid 19 Terhadap Bank Syariah
Impact of Covid-19 On Islamic Banks,” Ekonomikawan: Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi Dan Studi
Pembangunan 20, no. 79 (2020): 221–30.
18 “Profitability of Saudi Commercial Banks : A Comparative Evaluation between Domestic
and Foreign Banks Using Capital Adequacy , Asset Quality , Management Quality , Earning
Ability and Liquidity Parameters,” International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues 7, no. 2
(2017): 477–84.
19 “Roles of Capital Adequacy and Liquidity to Improve Banking Performance,” Journal of
Asian
Finance,
Economics
and
Business
7,
no.
11
(2020):
75–81,
https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no11.075.
12
© 2024, the author(s) Published by LP3M-IAI Syarifuddin. This is an open access article under the CC BY 4.0 license
| 387
IQTISHODUNA: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam
Volume 13 Issue 1, April 2024
ISSN (Print): 2252-5661, ISSN (Online): 2443-0056
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54471/iqtishoduna.v13i1.2342
efficient infrastructure development is required. Banking efficiency plays an
important role in supporting profitability.
Based on this research gap, this study was conducted to answer how feebased income can increase banking profitability. In the perspective of efficiency
theory, in the long run, the output of the activity will fluctuate in producing
efficiency. Banks can achieve efficiency at some stage, but not always at others.
As a business entity, banks are very interested in achieving efficiency. The ratio
of operational efficiency in banking can be measured by OER (ratio of operating
expenses to operating income). Cost-based revenues that can improve efficiency
are expected to increase profitability.
This research explores the effect of fee-based (non-interest) income in
increasing bank profitability. Banks that successfully manage fee-based revenues
so as to create efficiencies can increase profitability. The capital adequacy ratio
(CAR) is another component that affects profitability. Research by Saif-alyousfi
et al. and Margono et al. states that a large CAR describes stronger capital held
by banks. A high CAR value will further support the achievement of the bank's
profitability targets. This research is expected to contribute to the literature by
filling in existing research gaps and providing a new understanding of fee-based
income management in Islamic banking in Indonesia, especially in the context of
efficiency and profitability.
METHODS
The study analyzes the effect of fee-based income (non-interest income)
and capital adequacy ratio on profitability with bank efficiency (OER) as the
intervening variable. This type of research is quantitative research. The data used
is secondary data with a population of all Islamic Commercial Banks registered
at OJK for 2010-2019. The selected research sample is 11 Islamic Commercial
Banks taken using purposive sampling with collection methods through indirect
observation and internet research on the OJK official website and each bank. Test
the hypothesis and it is done using multiple regression analysis techniques,
including the R2 determination Test, the F test, and T-test and path analysis tests
(path analysis) to test the effect of intervening variables. Data were analyzed
using the computer application E-views ten and SPSS version 21.
RESULT AND DISCUSSION
Stationarity testing in this study was carried out using the Unit Root Test
developed by Dickey-fuller. The results obtained are as follows:
Table 1. Result of Stationarity Test
Variable Prob* Level
Description
Prob* 1st different
NII
0.0804
Not Stationer
0.0001
CAR
0.0000
Stationer
0.0000
OER
0.0646
Not Stationer
0.0000
ROA
0.0381
Stationer
0.0000
Source: Secondary data, processed, 2021
388
Description
Stasioner
Stasioner
Stasioner
Stasioner
| © 2024, the author(s) Published by LP3M-IAI Syarifuddin. This is an open access article under the CC BY 4.0 license
Faqih Nabhan et al.; The Role of Operational Efficiency
From the description of the table above, it can be seen that all research
variables (NII, CAR, OER, and ROA) show the value of prob* < 0.05 at the first
different level so that it can be stated that all variables are stationary.
The classical assumption test was carried out in four stages: normality,
multicollinearity, autocorrelation, and heteroscedasticity. A good regression
model is a model that is free from the classical assumption test. The results of the
classical assumption test that has been carried out with the SPSS version 21 data
processing program are as follows:
Test
Normality
Table 2. Result of Classic Assumption Test
Results
Asymp. sig.(2-tailed) = 0.79, < 0.05.
Multicollinearity
Tolerance: NII=0.952, CAR= 0.741, OER=
0.766 > 0.10, VIF: NII= 1.051, CAR=
1,350, OER= 1.305 < 10
Autocorrelation
du < DW test < 4-du = 1.734 < 1.863 <
2.266
Heteroscedasticity
Significance value NII = 0.536, CAR =
0.180, OER = 0,768 > 0.05
Information
Normal
Distributed
Data
There are no
symptoms of
multicollinea
rity
There are no
indication of
autocorrelati
on
There is no
indication of
heteroscedast
icity
Source: Secondary data, processed, 2021
Based on the description of the table above, it can be concluded that the
regression model is free from classical assumption test deviations, and the data
used has been generally distributed so that the regression model of this study can
be continued to the stage of multiple regression analysis and path analysis.
Hypothesis Test
The results were obtained with two analytical models, including multiple
regression analysis and path analysis, to test the effect of intervening variables.
The results of multiple regression analysis are shown in Table 3, which explains
the partial effect of each independent variable on the dependent variable. While
Figure 1 and Table 4 illustrate the influence of the independent variable on the
dependent variable through the intervening variable.
© 2024, the author(s) Published by LP3M-IAI Syarifuddin. This is an open access article under the CC BY 4.0 license
| 389
IQTISHODUNA: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam
Volume 13 Issue 1, April 2024
ISSN (Print): 2252-5661, ISSN (Online): 2443-0056
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54471/iqtishoduna.v13i1.2342
Table 3. Regression Result
Model T value
sig
Conclusion
NII →
2.761 0.007
Significant
ROA
CAR → -0.239 0.811
Not
ROA
Significant
OER →
0.000
Significant
ROA
18.98
7
NII → -1.214 0.228
Not
OER
Significant
CAR → -5.830 0.000
Significant
OER
Noted: NII: Fee-Based Income, CAR: Capital Adequacy Ratio, OER: Bank
Efficiency, ROA: Profitability
Figure 1. Path Analysis
Table 4. Mediating Result Analysis
Model
t value
t table Conclusion
NII→OE 1.1972 1.989
Rejected
R→ROA
CAR→O 4.0286 1.989
Accepted
ER→RO
A
390
| © 2024, the author(s) Published by LP3M-IAI Syarifuddin. This is an open access article under the CC BY 4.0 license
Faqih Nabhan et al.; The Role of Operational Efficiency
Noted: NII: Fee-Based Income, CAR: Capital Adequacy Ratio, OER: Bank
Efficiency, ROA: Profitability
Based on the results of the analysis above, it is known that the NII variable
has a positive effect on profitability as indicated by its significance value of 0.007,
where this value is smaller than = 0.05, and the t arithmetic value is greater than
the t table, namely 2.761 > 1.989. so H1 is accepted. The increase in fee-based
income can increase bank profitability because the increase in fee-based income
can be used as additional margin income obtained by the bank, which has been
adjusted with minimal risk so that it will have a positive impact on profit growth
The results of the study are supported by Wu20, Ahamed21, and Olowolaju22.
Capital adequacy ratio (CAR) has no significant effect on profitability as
indicated by its significance value of 0.811 which is more critical than 0.05, and
the t arithmetic value, which is smaller than the t table, namely (-0.239) < 1.989,
so H2 is rejected. The Bank continually strives to keep the CAR value above the
minimum criteria required by Bank Indonesia regulations, a minimum of 8%.
However, this high CAR tends not to be managed effectively by banks to
generate profits, but banks invest them in the form of non-liquid assets so that
there is no effect on increasing ROA. The research is in line with Wibisono and
Prasanjaya & Ramantha, which state that CAR has no influence on bank
profitability23,24.
The analysis results in state that NII's effect on OER is insignificant,
indicated by a significance value of 0.228 which is more significant than = 0.05,
and the importance of t count (-1.214) < t table 1.988, so H3 is rejected. The results
identify the size of non-interest income does not necessarily affect the OER ratio.
This is because the NII level obtained by the bank is still relatively low, and most
of the bank's income is still dominated by revenue sharing. Revenue sharing
20 Wu, “Examining the
Internal Determinants of Profitability of Commercial Banks in China:
A Panel Data Modeling Based Empirical Study.”
21 Ahamed, “Asset Quality , Non-Interest Income , And Bank Profitability : Evidence From
Indian Banks.”
22 Olowolaju, “Effect of Non-Interest Income on Profitability of Deposit Money Banks in
Nigeria.”
23 “Pengaruh CAR, NPF, BOPO, FDR, Terhadap ROA Yang Dimediasi Oleh NOM,” Jurnal
Bisnis & Manajemen 17, no. 1 (2017): 41–62.
24 “Analisis Pengaruh Rasio CAR, BOPO, LDR Dan Ukuran Perusahaan Terhadap
Profitabilitas Bank Yang Terdaftar Di BEI,” E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana 1 (2013): 230–
45.
© 2024, the author(s) Published by LP3M-IAI Syarifuddin. This is an open access article under the CC BY 4.0 license
| 391
IQTISHODUNA: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam
Volume 13 Issue 1, April 2024
ISSN (Print): 2252-5661, ISSN (Online): 2443-0056
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54471/iqtishoduna.v13i1.2342
requires high operating costs, so most of the OER ratio is influenced by interest
income. Research is in line with Sufian et al.25 and Sahusilawane26.
Based on the study's results, the effect of CAR on OER is negative, which is
indicated by the significance value of 0.000, which is smaller than =0.05, and the
t-count (-5.380) <1.988, so H4 is accepted. This is because, in general, banks that
have high capital can finance risky assets and losses arising from operational
activities with their money. This will encourage a decrease in bank debt to
external parties so that the operating costs incurred by the bank will also
decrease. Decreased operational costs will impact the smaller OER value so that
the increase in CAR will reduce the level of OER owned by banks. Sunardi and
Miftahurrohman supported the research27.
From the results of the research conducted, it was found that OER had a
significant adverse effect on profitability, indicated by the significance value
0.000, which was smaller than =0.05, and the t-value, which was smaller than the
t-table value, namely (-18.987) <1.989, so H5 was accepted. A high OER value
indicates an increase in operational costs to be incurred by the bank, resulting in
inefficient bank operations. If the bank's condition is weak, the impact will reduce
the profitability growth that the bank will receive. Harahap and Ruslan et al.
support research,28.
Based on the results of the Sobel test, it was found that OER could not
mediate the effect of NII on profitability. This is shown by the results of the Sobel
test, which states that the t count is 1.1972, smaller than 1.989, so H6 is rejected.
This research is supported by Wu 29 , which says that non-interest income
positively affects profitability. A study by Sufian et al.30 also states that fee-based
income (non-interest income) does not affect efficiency.
However, the operational efficiency ratio was able to mediate the effect of
CAR on profitability. This is indicated by the t-value of 4.0286, more significant
than the t-table 1.989, so H7 is accepted. This research is supported by Ailiyah ,
which states that the capital adequacy ratio affects Profitability (ROA) through
“Globalization and Bank Efficiency Nexus: Empirical Evidence from the Malaysian
Banking
Sector,”
Benchmarking:
An
International
Journal
24,
no.
5
(2017),
https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-09-2014-0090.
26 “Pengaruh Likuiditas, Kualitas Aktiva, Sensitivitas Pasar, Fee Based Income, Dan Margin
Bunga Terhadap Efisiensi Pada Bank Pembangunan Daerah” (STIE Perbanas Surabaya, 2017).
27 Miftahurrohman, “Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Tingkat Efisiensi
Perbankan Syariah Dengan Pendekatan Data Envelopment Analysis (Studi Pada Bank Syariah
Negara-Negara ASEAN),” Jurnal Lentera Akuntansi 4, no. 1 (2019): 71–91.
28 “The Role Of Efficiency Mediation In The Effect Of Banks Size On Bank Profitability In
Indonesia,” Hasanuddin Economics and Business Review Vol. 3, no. 1 (2019): 49–58,
https://doi.org/10.26487/hebr.v3i1.1846.
29 Wu, “Examining the Internal Determinants of Profitability of Commercial Banks in China:
A Panel Data Modeling Based Empirical Study.”
30 Sufian, Kamarudin, and Nassir, “Globalization and Bank Efficiency Nexus: Empirical
Evidence from the Malaysian Banking Sector.”
25
392
| © 2024, the author(s) Published by LP3M-IAI Syarifuddin. This is an open access article under the CC BY 4.0 license
Faqih Nabhan et al.; The Role of Operational Efficiency
the OER ratio. High capital adequacy will reduce the OER value so that the lower
OER value will increase the profitability received by the bank.
CONCLUSION
Based on this study's results, Islamic commercial banks should focus on
improving fee-based income and CAR management to increase profitability.
Islamic banks that can manage fee-based income and CAR could increase
profitability. This study contributes to the theory of efficiency. OER failed to
mediate the effect of fee-based income on profitability. Based on efficiency
theory, increasing efficiency should be able to increase profitability. However,
this study found that increasing efficiency has not been able to encourage the role
of fee-based income in achieving profitability.
The limitations of the study lie in the research variables and indicators
used. The variables used are financial performance variables only and do not
include macroeconomic variables. The hands and references used are also less
than perfect and do not support the maximization of research results, so it is
hoped that further researchers can add to the literature and use relevant
indicators, especially regarding fee-based income, profitability, and bank
efficiency, so that they can obtain more accurate research results.
Author’s Contribution
Faqih Nabhan: Contribute to formulating research ideas, collecting data, processing data,
and interpreting data.
Ayu Widyaningsih: Contributing to writing systematics, research methods, and analyzing
interpretation results, the language proofread.
Acknowledgements
The author is grateful to those who helped in the completion of this article, especially during the
data collection process and article review.
Declaration of Competing Interest
The author declares that there is no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approvalx`
Ethical approval No patient-identifying parts in this paper were used or known to the authors.
Therefore, no ethical approval was requested.
REFERENCES
Ahamed, M Mostak. “Asset Quality , Non-Interest Income , And Bank
Profitability : Evidence From Indian Banks.” Economic Modelling 63
(2017): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2017.01.016.
Doan, Anh-Tuan, Kun-Li Lin, and Shuh-Chyi Doong. “What Drives Bank
Efficiency? The Interaction Of Bank Income Diversification And
Ownership.” International Review of Economics and Finance, 2017.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2017.07.019.
Effendi, Ihsan, and Prawidya Hariani RS. “Dampak Covid 19 Terhadap Bank
© 2024, the author(s) Published by LP3M-IAI Syarifuddin. This is an open access article under the CC BY 4.0 license
| 393
IQTISHODUNA: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam
Volume 13 Issue 1, April 2024
ISSN (Print): 2252-5661, ISSN (Online): 2443-0056
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54471/iqtishoduna.v13i1.2342
Syariah Impact of Covid-19 On Islamic Banks.” Ekonomikawan: Jurnal
Ilmu Ekonomi Dan Studi Pembangunan 20, no. 79 (2020): 221–30.
Harahap, Irwan Manggara. “Impact of Bank Performance on Profitability.”
Scholars Journal of Economics, Business and Management (SJEBM) 5, no. 8
(2018): 727–33. https://doi.org/10.21276/sjebm.2018.5.8.3.
Lisnawati, Lisna. “Pengaruh Intellectual Capital Dan Non Interest Income
Terhadap Kesehatan Bank Syariah Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek
Indonesia Periode 2015-2019.” International Journal of Accounting,
Taxation, and Business 1, no. 1 (2020): 45–67.
Margono, Hery, Mursida Kusuma Wardani, and Julia Safitri. “Roles of Capital
Adequacy and Liquidity to Improve Banking Performance.” Journal of
Asian Finance, Economics and Business 7, no. 11 (2020): 75–81.
https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no11.075.
Miftahurrohman. “Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Tingkat Efisiensi
Perbankan Syariah Dengan Pendekatan Data Envelopment Analysis
(Studi Pada Bank Syariah Negara-Negara ASEAN).” Jurnal Lentera
Akuntansi 4, no. 1 (2019): 71–91.
Ming-lu, Wu. “Examining the Internal Determinants of Profitability of
Commercial Banks in China: A Panel Data Modeling Based Empirical
Study,” International Journal of Managerial Studies and Research 8, no. 3
(2020): 1–12, https://doi.org/10.20431/2349-0349.0803001.
Muharam, Harjum, and Bianda Bellinda. “Diversifikasi Pendapatan, Kinerja
Bank, Dan Peran Moderasi Tipe Kepemilikan.” Jurnal Bisnis Strategi 29,
no. 1 (2020).
Nguyen, Thi Lam Anh. “Diversification and Bank Efficiency in Six ASEAN
Countries.” Global Finance Journal Journal 37, no. September 2017 (2018):
57–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2018.04.004.
Olowolaju, Philip Segun. “Effect of Non-Interest Income on Profitability of
Deposit Money Banks in Nigeria.” Journal of Banking and Financial
Dynamics
2
(2018):
1–8.
https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.525.2018.21.1.8.
Oredegbe, Abayomi. “Cost Efficiency Determinants : Evidence from the
Canadian Banking Industry.” International Journal of Business and
Management
15,
no.
1
(2020):
86–98.
https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v15n1p86.
Prasanjaya, A.A. Yogi, and I Wayan Ramantha. “Analisis Pengaruh Rasio CAR,
BOPO, LDR Dan Ukuran Perusahaan Terhadap Profitabilitas Bank Yang
Terdaftar Di BEI.” E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana 1 (2013): 230–
45.
394
| © 2024, the author(s) Published by LP3M-IAI Syarifuddin. This is an open access article under the CC BY 4.0 license
Faqih Nabhan et al.; The Role of Operational Efficiency
Raharjo, Hendrawan, Anita Wijayanti, and Riana R Dewi. “Analisis Pengaruh
Kinerja Keuangan Dan Inflasi Terhadap Profitabilitas Bank Umum
Syariah Di Indonesia (Tahun 2014-2018).” Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Dan
Manajemen (JIAM) 16, no. 1 (2020): 15–26.
Raphael, Gwahula. “Bank-Specific , Industry-Specific And Macroeconomic
Determinants Of Bank Efficiency In Tanzania : A Two Stage Analysis.”
European Journal of Business and Management 5, no. 2 (2013): 142–55.
Ruslan, Andi, Cepi Pahlevi, Syamsu Alam, and Mursalim Nohong. “The Role Of
Efficiency Mediation In The Effect Of Banks Size On Bank Profitability In
Indonesia.” Hasanuddin Economics and Business Review Vol. 3, no. 1 (2019):
49–58. https://doi.org/10.26487/hebr.v3i1.1846.
Sahusilawane, Alda Gabriella. “Pengaruh Likuiditas, Kualitas Aktiva,
Sensitivitas Pasar, Fee Based Income, Dan Margin Bunga Terhadap
Efisiensi Pada Bank Pembangunan Daerah.” STIE Perbanas Surabaya,
2017.
Saif-alyousfi, Abdulazeez Y H, Asish Saha, and Rohani Md-rus. “Profitability of
Saudi Commercial Banks : A Comparative Evaluation between Domestic
and Foreign Banks Using Capital Adequacy , Asset Quality ,
Management Quality , Earning Ability and Liquidity Parameters.”
International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues 7, no. 2 (2017): 477–
84.
Sufian, Fadzlan, Fakarudin Kamarudin, and Annuar Md. Nassir. “Globalization
and Bank Efficiency Nexus: Empirical Evidence from the Malaysian
Banking Sector.” Benchmarking: An International Journal 24, no. 5 (2017).
https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-09-2014-0090.
Sun, Limei, Siqin Wu, Zili Zhu, and Alec Stephenson. “Non Interest Income and
Performance of Commercial Banking in China.” Hindawi Scientific
Programming 2017 (2017): 1–8.
Sunardi, Nardi. “Pengaruh Intellectual Capital ( Ib-Vaic Tm ), FDR Dan CAR
Terhadap Efisiensi Biaya Dan Implikasinya Pada Kinerja Perusahaan
Bank Umum Syariah Indonesia.” Jurnal Sekuritas Manajemen Keuangan 1,
no. 1 (2017): 1–17.
Verley, Gatien, Tim Willaert, Christian Van Den Broeck, and Massimiliano
Esposito. “Universal Theory of Efficiency Fluctuations.” Physical Review
E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics 90, no. 5 (2014): 1–10.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.90.052145.
Wibisono, Muhammad Yusuf. “Pengaruh CAR, NPF, BOPO, FDR, Terhadap
ROA Yang Dimediasi Oleh NOM.” Jurnal Bisnis & Manajemen 17, no. 1
(2017): 41–62.
© 2024, the author(s) Published by LP3M-IAI Syarifuddin. This is an open access article under the CC BY 4.0 license
| 395
IQTISHODUNA: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam
Volume 13 Issue 1, April 2024
ISSN (Print): 2252-5661, ISSN (Online): 2443-0056
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54471/iqtishoduna.v13i1.2342
Wu, Ming-lu.“Examining the Internal Determinants of Profitability of
Commercial Banks in China: A Panel Data Modeling Based Empirical
Study.” International Journal of Managerial Studies and Research 8, no. 3
(2020): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.20431/2349-0349.0803001.
396
| © 2024, the author(s) Published by LP3M-IAI Syarifuddin. This is an open access article under the CC BY 4.0 license