Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Comparative evaluation of vibrocompression and bag squeezing: A randomized study

2012, European Respiratory Journal

European Respiratory Society Annual Congress 2012 Abstract Number: 1951 Publication Number: P1177 Abstract Group: 9.2. Physiotherapists Keyword 1: Intensive care Keyword 2: Children Keyword 3: Physiotherapy care Title: Comparative evaluation of vibrocompression and bag squeezing: A randomized study Ms. Letícia 10465 Matins leticiaqm.fisio@hotmail.com.br , Ms. Livia 10466 Freitas livita2003@hotmail.com , Ms. Suzilaine 10467 Bacci sll.santos@bol.com.br , Dr. Lilian 10468 Abreu lilianrabreu@hotmail.com , Prof. Dr Lucio 10469 Araújo lucio@famat.ufu.br and Prof. Dr Célia 10470 Lopes celialopesfisio@gmail.com . 1 Physiotherapy Department, Clinical Hospital of Federal University of Uberlandia, MG, Brazil, 38400000 ; 2 Physiotherapy Department, Clinical Hospital of Federal University of Uberlandia, MG, Brazil, 38400000 ; 3 Physiotherapy Department, Clinical Hospital of Federal University of Uberlandia, MG, Brazil, 38400000 ; 4 Physiotherapy Department, Clinical Hospital of Federal University of Uberlandia, MG, Brazil, 38400000 ; 5 Mathematic Department, Federal University of Uberlandia, MG, Brazil, 38400000 and 6 Phisical Education and Physiotherapy Department of Federal University of Uberlandia, Federal University of Uberlandia, Uberlandia, MG, Brazil, 38400000 . Body: INTRODUCTION:Few scientific evidence has demonstrated the effects of respiratory physiotherapy in intubated children. The clearance maneuvers in mechanical ventilation in this population require further investigation.OBJECTIVES:Analyze and compare the hemodynamic effects, ventilation and respiratory mechanics of two techniques in intubated children with respiratory failure.METHOD:Eleven children with mean age of 28.42±15.42 month were randomized into two groups according to the technique used: (1) Bag Squeezing (BS; n=5) and (2) vibrocompression thoracic (VCT; n=6). All variables were studied before, immediately and 30, 60 and 120min after the maneuvers (p<.05).RESULTS:for both groups were found similar results, no significant differences. Heart rate and mean blood pressure presented higher in BS group in the post maneuver (p=.04, p=.43) compared with pre maneuver. The HR, ETCO2, plateau pressure and static compliance were also higher in the post-maneuver in VCT group. There was no significant difference in the other respiratory variables or respiratory mechanics. Significant negative correlation between Rst e Cst was observed in the BS at all the times evaluated (R=.97,p=.00;R=.89,p=.04;R=.75,p=.00) The same results were observed for VC and ETCO2 post maneuvers (R=.90,p=.03). In the VCT was found positive correlation between the Rst and the Pp before maneuver (R=.97,p=.01),30(R=.94,p=.00) and 120min post (R=.66,p=.00) and between VC and ETCO2. There was also a positive correlation between VC and ETCO2 immediately after maneuver (R=.82,p=.04) and 30 min post (R=.87,p=.02).CONCLUSION:Both techniques didn't present changes in hemodynamic and ventilatory responses, even in the respiratory mechanic.