ISSN 0020-1685, Inorganic Materials, 2016, Vol. 52, No. 7, pp. 643–649. © Pleiades Publishing, Ltd., 2016.
Original Russian Text © Khanh Cong Tran, E.N. Mozhevitina, K.A. Potapova, B.N. Levonovich, I.Ch. Avetissov, 2016, published in Neorganicheskie Materialy, 2016, Vol. 52, No. 7,
pp. 699–705.
Selenium Solubility in Solid Zinc Selenide
Khanh Cong Tran, E. N. Mozhevitina, K. A. Potapova, B. N. Levonovich, and I. Ch. Avetissov
Mendeleev University of Chemical Technology, Miusskaya pl. 9, Moscow, 125047 Russia
e-mail: aich@rctu.ru
Received May 5, 2015; in final form, November 12, 2015
Abstract—Selenium solubility in solid s-ZnSe ( F 43m ) under mono- and divariant equilibrium conditions has
been determined by a direct physicochemical method in the temperature range 850–1173 K. The maximum
concentration of excess selenium is 3.76 × 10–4 mol of excess Se per mole of ZnSe at 1173 K. The homogeneity range of the s-ZnSe phase has been shown to be characterized by retrograde solubility at its Se-rich
phase boundary. A model has been proposed for defect formation in nonstoichiometric s-ZnSe at temperatures in the range 963–1173 K and pSe 2 pressures in the range 1.05 × 10 4 to 5.01 × 105 Pa according to which
the dissolution of excess Se is accompanied by the formation of electrically neutral associated vacancy defects
in the zinc sublattice.
Keywords: zinc selenide, nonstoichiometry, selenium solubility, point defects
DOI: 10.1134/S0020168516070037
INTRODUCTION
Owing to its unique physicochemical properties,
zinc selenide has found wide application in optoelectronic devices, in particular as a substrate material for
blue light-emitting diodes (LEDs); in X-ray detectors;
and in the fabrication of optical components, such as
windows, lenses, mirrors, and prisms, operating in the
IR spectral region in specialized optical systems and
CO2 laser optics.
Structure-sensitive properties of the materials in
question are determined by both doping and native
point defects. The presence of native point defects,
due to thermal disorder and deviations of the composition of phases from stoichiometry [1], is thermodynamically unavoidable at temperatures above absolute
zero. Availability of reliable information about the pi–
T–x phase diagram of the Zn–Se system, including
information about the homogeneity range of zinc selenide, is a necessary condition for successful development of technologies of poly- and single crystals with
controlled composition.
Despite the extensive studies of zinc selenide due to
its practical importance, no consistent data on the
homogeneity range of ZnSe are available in the literature. The wurtzite–sphalerite (3C–2H) polymorphic
transformation, which occurs near the maximum
melting point of zinc selenide, is still unclear in a number of aspects [2]. A scheme of this transformation was
proposed by Okada and Kawanaka [3] based on differential thermal analysis (DTA) results.
In this study, we made an attempt to clarify the
question of selenium solubility in solid ZnSe and
locate the homogeneity range of zinc selenide by a
direct physicochemical method.
EXPERIMENTAL
Analysis of the purity of zinc selenide samples. To
study the nonstoichiometry of ZnSe, we used s-ZnSe
powder with an average particle size of 50 ± 20 μm.
The starting ZnSe powder (ELMA, 5N, sphalerite
structure) was further purified by vacuum resublimation. The impurity composition of the samples was
determined by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) with a NexION 300D ICP-MS
system (PerkinElmer, USA) and by secondary ion
mass spectrometry (SIMS) with a MiniSIMS system
(Millbrook, UK) under conditions meeting the
requirements of the Russian Federation State Standard GOST 12997-76. The samples were prepared in a
laboratory room that met the ISO 7 cleanroom
requirements. The measurements were performed by
the Total Quant method using a collision cell in
kinetic energy discrimination (KED) mode in order to
eliminate spectral interferences. According to the
measurement results, the purity of the resublimed
material (with allowance for gas-forming impurities)
was 99.9991+ wt % (Fig. 1).
Procedure for the synthesis of nonstoichiometric sZnSe samples. Nonstoichiometric s-ZnSe samples
were synthesized in silica glass ampules. The ampules
were produced using extrapure-grade silica tubes
643
644
KHANH CONG TRAN et al.
С, wt %
10–2
10–3
10–4
10–5
10–6
10–7
Resublimed s-ZnSe, 99.9991 wt %
Starting s-ZnSe powder, 99.997 wt %
Be C O Na Al P Cl Ca Ti Cr Fe Ni Ga As Rb Y NbRu Pd Cd Sn Te Cs La Pr SmGdDy Er Yb Hf W Os Pt Hg Pb Th
Fig. 1. Impurity analysis data for the s-ZnSe samples.
(Russian Federation Purity Standard TU 5932-0I400288679-01) having a smooth surface and free of visible flaws, 10–12 mm in inner diameter. To prevent
oxygen diffusion across the walls of the ampules at
synthesis temperatures above 1150 K, the inner surface
of the ampules was graphitized through the pyrolysis
of extrapure-grade acetone (Company Specification
STP TU COMP 2-001-06).
s-ZnSe powder samples and elemental selenium
(Russian Federation Purity Standard TU 6-09-252177) were loaded into an ampule through a silica funnel. Next, the ampules containing the s-ZnSe samples
were pumped down to a residual gas pressure of 10–2
Pa or lower and hermetically sealed.
High-temperature annealings of the s-ZnSe samples
were carried out under monovariant (Ss-ZnSeL(Se)V) and
divariant (Ss-ZnSeV) equilibrium conditions (Fig. 2) in a
two-zone resistance furnace with a controlled temperature profile and 1-K temperature stability, and
were followed by the “quenching” of the high-temperature equilibrium reached [4].
To prevent the liquid phase from reaching the sample being synthesized when the process was carried out
under Ss-ZnSeL(Se)V monovariant equilibrium conditions, the sample was spatially isolated from the heterophase mixture that determined the monovariant equilibrium conditions. Superheating the s-ZnSe sample
to 2–5 K above the temperature of the monovariant
system did not cause its composition to differ significantly from the true equilibrium value [4].
Under Ss-ZnSeV divariant equilibrium conditions, the
addition of an inert gas to a quasi-closed system helps
to equalize the selenium vapor partial pressure over the
pure Se component and that over the ZnSe compound
[1]. To evaluate the vapor pressure over solid s-ZnSe,
we proceeded from mechanical stability of a closed
system, used reference data on the composition and
vapor pressure of various selenium molecules [5] and
the dissociation constant of ZnSe, and solved Eq. (1)
for pSe 2 :
8
12
(ki pSe 2 ) 2/ i
k diss pSe 2 + pSe 2 +
i =1, i ≠ 2
T1
8
0l
pSe
=
,
i
i =1
T2
∑
(1)
∑
where kdiss is the dissociation constant of solid zinc selenide according to the reaction ZnSes → Zn v + 1 Sev2
2
0l
[6], pSe 2 is the partial pressure of the i-th molecular
selenium species in the vapor phase over pure liquid
selenium at temperature T2, and ki is the constant of
equilibrium between the i-th molecular selenium species and Se2 molecules in the vapor phase at temperature T1.
Determination of the excess component concentration. The concentration of excess components in the
“quenched” s-ZnSe samples was determined by an
extraction method. The basic physicochemical principles of the method were described in detail by Avetissov et al. [7]. The method builds on the vacuum
extraction of the excess component from solid ZnSe
into the vapor phase in a temperature gradient, transfer of the vapor into the “cold” part of the ampule,
vapor condensation on the ampule walls, and subsequent determination of the condensate composition
by chemical analysis. We experimentally determined
conditions that ensured a detection limit for excess
selenium at a level of 4 × 10–8 mol of excess Se per
mole of ZnSe: TZnSe = 773 K, Tcondensate = 500 K, and
extraction time of 65 h. After annealing, the ampule
was cooled and cut, the condensate was dissolved in
extrapure-grade nitric acid (Russian Federation Standard GOST 11125-84), and the composition of the
condensate was determined quantitatively by ICP-MS
with a selenium detection limit of 1 × 10–8 g/mL and
zinc detection limit of 2 × 10–8 g/mL.
INORGANIC MATERIALS
Vol. 52
No. 7
2016
SELENIUM SOLUBILITY IN SOLID ZINC SELENIDE
645
log pSe2
log pSe2
V
0l
pSe
2
sZn
Se L
-Z
nS
eL
V
0l
pSe
2
0s
pSe
2
S
Ss
0s
pSe
2
Ss
-Z
nS
e
Ss
=
-Z
nS
e
V
1/T
T1 T2
=
V
T1
T2
1/T
Ss-ZnSe + LSe
T
ZnSes
∆T ≃
5K
lg p
Sel
ptotal
рinert gas
pSe2
T2
T1
l
Ss-ZnSe
pZn
Fig. 2. Schematics illustrating the synthesis of a nonstoichiometric s-ZnSe phase under Ss-ZnSeL(Se)V monovariant (left panels)
and Ss-ZnSeV divariant (right panels) equilibrium conditions.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Nonstoichiometry can be quantified in a great
diversity of ways [7]. In this study, the superstoichiometric (excess) selenium content of s-ZnSe was calculated as
ex
X Se
=
mSe M Se − mZn M Zn
,
mZnSe M ZnSe
where MSe, MZn, and MZnSe are the molecular weights
of zinc, selenium, and zinc selenide, respectively;
mZnSe is the weight of the nonstoichiometric s-ZnSe
sample; and mZn and mSe are the weights of the zinc
and selenium in the condensate after the completion
of the extraction process, respectively.
The results obtained by determining the phase
boundaries of s-ZnSe under Ss-ZnSeL(Se)V monovariant
equilibrium conditions in the temperature range 850–
1173 K (Table 1) demonstrate that, as the temperature
is raised from 850 to 1173 K, the excess selenium concentration increases by more than a factor of 7: from
(5.29 ± 0.18) × 10–5 to (37.65 ± 0.87) × 10–5 mol of
excess Se per mole of ZnSe.
INORGANIC MATERIALS
Vol. 52
No. 7
2016
The homogeneity range of ZnSe was shown to
include its stoichiometric composition. The solidus
has a retrograde character at both the Zn-rich [2] and
Se-rich phase boundaries of zinc selenide (Fig. 3).
The solubility of excess selenium in zinc selenide
was studied as a function of selenium partial pressure, log XSe = f( pSe 2 ), using s-ZnSe samples synthesized under Ss-ZnSeV divariant equilibrium conditions at temperatures of 963, 1078, and 1173 K (Table 2).
m M Se − mZn M Zn
meas
calc
In Table 2, X Se
= Se
, and X Se
=
mZnSe M ZnSe
k
2n[(V 2n )×2n ] is the nonstoichiometry value calculated by Eq. (3) (see below).
In the isothermal solubility curves for Se in s-ZnSe
(Fig. 4), the data points at the maximum pressures
max
characterize the solubility of excess selenium
pSe
2
under Ss-ZnSeL(Se)V monovariant equilibrium conditions.
We failed to measure the concentration of free
charge carriers in “quenched” single-crystal samples
synthesized in parallel with the powder samples at a
∑
n =1
646
KHANH CONG TRAN et al.
Table 1. Deviation from stoichiometry in nonstoichiometric s-ZnSe samples synthesized under Ss-ZnSeL(Se)V monovariant
equilibrium conditions
T, K
Time, h
mZnSe, g
mZn, μg
synthesis
1173
1127
1078
977
879
850
120
120
144
144
144
144
mSe, μg
analysis
0.8626
1.4694
1.6167
0.7782
0.8429
1.2463
detection limit of 1012 cm–3 in our electrical measurements, which corresponds to an excess selenium concentration at a level of 10–11 mol of excess Se per mole
of ZnSe. This leads us to conclude that, at temperatures from 963 to 1173 K and selenium pressures pSe 2 =
1.05 × 10 4 to 5.01 × 105 Pa, Se dissolution in nonstoichiometric s-ZnSe results in predominant formation
of electrically neutral defects. This conclusion is consistent with current views of defect formation in
ex
X Se
× 10 5, mol of
excess Se per mole of
ZnSe
1.43 ± 0.03
179.36 ± 4.15
37.65 ± 0.87
0.38 ± 0.01
0.40 ± 0.03
0.11 ± 0.02
0.14 ± 0.04
0.10 ± 0.03
91.69 ± 2.27
84.08 ± 3.19
31.13 ± 0.95
29.21 ± 1.25
36.18 ± 1.53
11.40 ± 0.28
9.45 ± 0.36
7.28 ± 0.22
6.30 ± 0.26
5.29 ± 0.18
undoped zinc selenide [11]. By analogy with other II–
VI compounds [12], we assume that, in the case of
selenium dissolution in s-ZnSe, defect formation
most likely follows the vacancy mechanism represented by the reaction scheme
×
v
×
n Se 2 → 2n Se Se + (V Zn )2n,
K (V
×
Zn ) 2 n
=
[(V Zn )×2n ]
,
n
pSe
2
(2)
Temperature, K
w-ZnSe
1700
1700
1500
1500
1300
1300
s-ZnSe
1100
1100
900
900
1
700
2
3
4
10–3
10–4
10–5
10–6
10–7
XZn, mol of excess Zn per mole of ZnSe
δ=0
10–6
10–5
10–4
10–3
XSe, mol of excess Se per mole of ZnSe
700
Fig. 3. Homogeneity range of zinc selenide and assumed scheme of the 3C–2H polymorphic transformation [3]: (1) this work,
(2) [8], (3) [9], (4) [10].
INORGANIC MATERIALS
Vol. 52
No. 7
2016
Table 2. Solubility of excess selenium in s-ZnSe under Ss-ZnSeV divariant equilibrium conditions
meas
X Se
× 10 6
mZn, μg
calc
X Se
× 10 6
[(V Zn )×2 × 10 6 ] [(V Zn )×4 × 1011]
[(V Zn )×8 ]
mSe, μg
meas
X Se
calc
− X Se
calc
mol of excess Se per mole of ZnSe
Vol. 52
1.73
1.1275
0.29 ± 0.02
3.46 ± 0.19
5.04 ± 0.27
2.39
1.2317
0.44 ± 0.02
6.90 ± 0.41
9.45 ± 0.56
2.75
0.7147
0.33 ± 0.03
9.71 ± 0.69
23.8 ± 1.6
5.01
0.8626
1.43 ± 0.03 179.36 ± 4.15
376.5 ± 8.7
0.104
1.0123
2.70 ± 0.10
4.90 ± 0.50
2.96 ± 0.50
2.99
0.168
1.0561
3.57 ± 0.14
6.73 ± 0.51
4.19 ± 0.59
0.168
1.4674
3.35 ± 0.16
8.89 ± 1.62
6.04 ± 1.78
0.376
1.2174
2.91 ± 0.12
15.42 ± 0.91
17.9 ± 1.2
0.509
1.0954
3.28 ± 0.08
15.26 ± 1.14
1.610
1.6167
0.40 ± 0.03
0.117
1.0163
0.188
5.57 × 10–7
11.6
16.0
1.92
2.01 × 10–6
–69.9
28.1
2.54
3.52 × 10–6
–18.2
8.45
3.89 × 10–5
17.2
1.50
4.61 × 10–11
–1.06
4.82
2.41
3.11 × 10–10
–15.1
4.82
2.41
3.11 × 10–10
20.2
10.8
5.39
7.76 × 10–9
39.4
18.9 ± 1.7
14.8
7.29
2.60 × 10–8
21.6
84.08 ± 3.19
94.5 ± 3.6
66.7
2.30
2.59 × 10–6
29.4
0.12 ± 0.02
8.62 ± 0.50
15.2 ± 0.8
15.8
7.91
–3.83
1.2388
3.49 ± 0.28
21.80 ± 0.35
26.0 ± 0.2
25.4
12.7
2.07
0.266
1.0312
0.15 ± 0.02
21.45 ± 0.38
37.7 ± 0.6
36.0
18.0
4.70
0.298
1.1401
0.21 ± 0.05
28.95 ± 0.52
46.0 ± 0.7
40.3
20.1
12.4
0.557
0.7782
0.41 ± 0.04
30.48 ± 0.41
70.5 ± 0.9
75.3
37.7
–6.83
1173
No. 7
311
2016
1078
963
647
1.01
4.46
,%
X Se
SELENIUM SOLUBILITY IN SOLID ZINC SELENIDE
INORGANIC MATERIALS
TZnSe, K
pSe 2 ,
mZnSe, g
Pa × 10–5
log XSe [mol of excess Se per mole of ZnSe]
648
KHANH CONG TRAN et al.
associates of two, four, and eight vacancies. The
degree of vacancy association was found to rise with
increasing temperature and increasing selenium
vapor partial pressure. To ensure an adequate
description of a (V Zn )×2 defect associate, we determined basic values of the enthalpy and entropy of its
formation ( Δ H (V )× = –116.4 kJ/mol and Δ S (V )× =
Zn 2
Zn 2
290.6 J/(mol K)) and increments that determine the
increase in enthalpy and entropy with increasing associate size (δh = –116.4 kJ/mol and δs = 515.5 J/(mol K))
using the equations
–3.0
1173 K
1078 K
963 K
–3.5
–4.0
–4.5
–5.0
–5.5
–6.0
4.0 4.2
4.4
4.6
4.8 5.0 5.2
log pSe2 [Pа]
5.4
5.6
5.8
Fig. 4. Isothermal solubility of excess selenium in zinc selenide as a function of selenium partial pressure. The data
points represent the experimental data and the solid lines
represent calculation by Eq. (3).
where n is 1/2, 1, 2, 3, or 4 according to quasichemical
defect formation theory [13] and selenium vapor composition [5].
ex
The excess selenium concentration X Se
in s-ZnSe
is given by
k
ex
X Se
=
∑( p
ni
Se 2
exp
i =1
(ΔRTH + ΔRS )).
i
i
(3)
Each term on the right-hand side of Eq. (3) determines the concentration of vacancy defects with the i-th
degree of association. As a crystalline phase
approaches its maximum melting point, such vacancy
associates (clusters) lead to complete disintegration of
the crystal and, eventually, to its melting. This hypothesis was first put forward by Frenkel [14] and is supported by increasing experimental evidence provided
by studies of modern nonstoichiometric phases: a variety of phases have been reported to have an anomalously broad homogeneity range in the immediate
vicinity of their maximum melting point.
Analysis of the present data on selenium solubility
in ZnSe indicates that reaction (2) is exothermic. We
were able to adequately describe all of the data with a
17% average relative uncertainty in excess selenium
concentration by taking into account the formation of
+ δ h n − 1,
n
(4)
n
−
1.
Δ S n = Δ S (V )× + δ S
Zn 2
n
The increments are not directly proportional to the
associate size but follow an n − 1 law, with increasing
n
decrease as the degree of association, n, increases (see
Eq. (2)). The present experimental data can be adequately described under the assumption that, with
increasing temperature, the cluster size, or the degree
of vacancy association, increases (Fig. 4, Table 3).
This means that, with increasing temperature, the
degree of disorder in the crystals increases, which is
consistent with Frenkel’s hypothesis [14] that disordering of crystals follows a vacancy mechanism as
their melting point is approached. Note that an
approach to melting is here taken to mean not only a
rise in temperature but also a displacement of the system from divariant equilibrium to monovariant one.
This is particularly clear at T = 1173 K, where increasing the selenium vapor pressure and bringing the system closer to monovariant equilibrium causes associates of eight defects (n = 4) to prevail (see Table 3).
Δ H n = Δ H (V
×
Zn ) 2
CONCLUSIONS
The present results demonstrate that the homogeneity range of ZnSe includes its stoichiometric composition in the temperature range 850–1173 K. The
solidus line has a retrograde character at both the Znrich and Se-rich phase boundaries. Analysis of the
present experimental data on selenium solubility in
nonstoichiometric s-ZnSe in terms of quasichemical
defect formation theory indicates that they can be ade-
Table 3. Thermodynamic parameters of the reactions underlying the formation of (V Zn )×2n vacancy associates as a result of
Se dissolution in nonstoichiometric s-ZnSe at different temperatures
T, K
n1
∆H1, kJ/mol
∆S1, J/(mol K)
n2
∆H2, kJ/mol
∆S2, J/(mol K)
963
1078
1173
1
1
2
–116.4
–116.4
–174.6
290.6
290.6
548.4
–
4
4
–
–203.7
–203.7
–
677.2
677.2
ni is the degree of vacancy defect association according to Eq. (2).
INORGANIC MATERIALS
Vol. 52
No. 7
2016
SELENIUM SOLUBILITY IN SOLID ZINC SELENIDE
quately described by the sum of exothermic reactions
representing the formation of associates (clusters)
based on electrically neutral vacancies in the zinc sublattice. The enthalpies and entropies of the reactions
underlying the formation of vacancy associates can be
described by a simple expression of the form En = Emin +
δE n − 1, which takes into account the enthalpy or
n
entropy of formation of a minimum associate (Emin)
and the increment δ E n − 1 determined by the asson
ciate size (n). The degree of vacancy association
increases with increasing temperature and increasing
selenium vapor partial pressure.
(
)
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This research was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, grant no. 15-13-10028.
REFERENCES
1. Kröger, F.A., The Chemistry of Imperfect Crystals,
Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1964.
2. Rudolph, P., Schtifer, N., and Fukuda, T., Crystal
growth of ZnSe from the melt, Mater. Sci. Eng., 1995,
vol. 15, pp. 85–133.
3. Okada, H. and Kawanaka, T., Study on the ZnSe phase
diagram by differential thermal analysis, J. Cryst.
Growth, 1996, vol. 165, pp. 31–36.
4. Zlomanov, V.P. and Novoselova, A.V., P–T–x diagrammy sostoyaniya sistem metal–khal’kogen (P–T–x
Phase Diagrams of Metal–Chalcogen Systems), Moscow: Nauka, 1987.
5. Kulikov, I.S., Termodinamika oksidov: spravochnoe
izdanie (Thermodynamics of Oxides: A Handbook),
Moscow: Metallurgiya, 1986.
INORGANIC MATERIALS
Vol. 52
No. 7
2016
649
6. Flogel, P., Zur Kristallzüchtung von Cadmiumsulfid
und anderen II–IV-Verbindungen: III. Zum Gleichgewichtzwischen Selen und Wasserstoff bei 1000°C, Z.
Anorg. Allg. Chem., 1969, vol. 370, nos. 1–2, pp. 16–30.
7. Avetissov, I., Mozhevitina, E., Khomyakov, A., and
Tran Khanh, Universal approach for nonstoichiometry
determination in binary chemical compounds, Cryst.
Res. Technol., 2015, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 93–100.
8. Kareiva, A., Kharif, Ya.L., and Avetisov, I.Ch., Nonstoichiometry of zinc selenide, Solid State Chem., 1993,
vol. 102, pp. 1–3.
9. Smith, F.T.J., Evidence for a native donor in ZnSe from
high temperature electrical measurements, Solid State
Commun., 1969, vol. 7, no. 24, pp. 1757–1761.
10. Avetissov, I.Ch., Chang, K., Zhavoronkov, N.V.,
Davydov, A.A., Mozhevitina, E.N., Khomyakov, A.V.,
Kobeleva, S., and Neustroev, S., Nonstoichiometry
and luminescent properties of ZnSe crystals grown
from melt and vapor, J. Cryst. Growth, 2014, vol. 401,
pp. 686–690.
11. Avetissov, I.Ch., Mozhevitina, E.N., Khomyakov, A.V.,
Avetisov, R.I., Davydov, A.A., Chegnov, V.P., Chegnova, O.I., and Zhavoronkov, N.V., Homogeneity limits and nonstoichiometry of vapor grown ZnTe and
CdTe crystals, CrystEngComm, 2015, vol. 17, pp. 561–
568.
12. Frenkel, J., Kineticheskaya teoriya zhidkostei (Kinetic
Theory of Liquids), Leningrad: Nauka, 1975.
13. Kharif, Ya.L., Kovtunenko, P.V., and Maier, A.A.,
Thermodynamics of nonstoichiometric lead and cadmium chalcogenides, Termodinamika i materialovedenie poluprovodnikov (Semiconductor Materials Thermodynamics and Technology), Glazov, V.M., Ed.,
Moscow: Metallurgiya, 1982.
14. Kovtunenko, P.V., Fizicheskaya khimiya tverdogo tela.
Kristally s defektami (Physical Chemistry of Solids:
Imperfect Crystals), Moscow: Vysshaya Shkola, 1993.