Academia.eduAcademia.edu

CFP Emotion and Empathy ACHS Montreal 2016

We would like to propose a session, building on the one we ran at the 2014 CHS conference in Canberra, on how emotion and affect feature in the fields of heritage and museums studies, memory studies, public history, heritage tourism, studies of the built and urban environment, conservation, archives and any field of study that deals with the emotional impact and use of the past in the present.

Empathy and Indifference – emotional/affective routes to and away from compassion Gary Campbell and Laurajane Smith We would like to propose a session, building on the one we ran at the 2014 CHS conference in Canberra, on how emotion and affect feature in the fields of heritage and museums studies, memory studies, public history, heritage tourism, studies of the built and urban environment, conservation, archives and any field of study that deals with the emotional impact and use of the past in the present. There is an increasing interest in how emotion is a form of judgement on things that effect our lives, identity and wellbeing. This session focuses on the issue of empathy, the emotional and imaginative skill to place yourself in the subjective position of another. Significant debate has occurred within the wider social sciences that has dismissed empathy as simply a feel good way of belittling or dismissing social justice issues and thus maintain individual and societal indifference to the marginalised. Conversely, others have argued that empathy is key to overturning indifference and effecting political and social change. Overall, this session asks to what role can and does heritage, in its various forms, play in engendering empathy, and what might an examination of the ways in which heritage and empathy interact reveal about the utility or otherwise of forms and experiences of empathy? Equally, what may the study of the emotional content of heritage practices and performances tell us about the maintenance of indifference? This session calls for 20 minute papers, that explicitly address not just the emotional content of heritage practices, but clearly explores the ways in which heritage is used in a range of contexts to elicit or withhold empathy, and the consequences this has for social debates and individual and collective wellbeing. Papers may explore such things as: Critically explores the idea of empathy and its role in the expression of different forms of heritage; the way empathy, or its withholding, can be used to either facilitate or closedown the extension of social recognition in heritage and museum contexts; how forms of commemoration can re-assert or challenge dominant historical or heritage narratives; how people using heritage sites or museums, or debating issues of historical importance, mobilise particular suites of emotional and affective responses to the past; how communities or other groups who propose non-authorised versions of heritage/history utilise emotional and affective responses to challenge received narratives about the past; research which critically investigates the empathetic responses of ‘visitors’ to heritage sites, museums and other forms of heritage; research which investigates the role of empathy in the expression and transference of intangible heritage. Gary Campbell is a sociologist and political scientist who has worked in public sector, tertiary and trade union research roles, on economic and industrial relations issues, and more recently on projects examining the politics of heritage and museum visiting. He has published with L. Smith on issues of emotion and heritage and was co-editor with L Smith, and P Shackel Heritage, Labour and the Working Class (2011, Routledge). Laurajane Smith, Head of the Centre of Heritage and Museum Studies, Australian National University and professor within the school of archaeology and anthropology. I have a particular interest in theorizing heritage as an embodied cultural process/practice and examining the intersection between heritage theory and practice and cultural policy. For more than 10 years I have been researching the ways in which heritage sites and museums are used by their visitors. One of the key issues to emerge from this research is the ways in which emotion is used to facilitate heritage performances and, more particularly, the role of empathy and indifference in altering and maintaining particular historical and social narratives.