Himalaya, the Journal of the
Association for Nepal and
Himalayan Studies
Volume 35 | Number 2
Article 23
January 2016
Obituary: Philippe Sagant (1936-2015)
Stéphane Gros
Centre National de la Recherche Scientiique (C.N.R.S., France)
Grégoire Schlemmer
Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (I.R.D. France)
Follow this and additional works at: htp://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/himalaya
Recommended Citation
Gros, Stéphane and Schlemmer, Grégoire (2016) "Obituary: Philippe Sagant (1936-2015)," Himalaya, the Journal of the Association for
Nepal and Himalayan Studies: Vol. 35: No. 2, Article 23.
Available at: htp://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/himalaya/vol35/iss2/23
his Other is brought to you for free and open access by the
DigitalCommons@Macalester College at DigitalCommons@Macalester
College. It has been accepted for inclusion in Himalaya, the Journal of the
Association for Nepal and Himalayan Studies by an authorized
administrator of DigitalCommons@Macalester College. For more
information, please contact scholarpub@macalester.edu.
Obituary | Philippe Sagant (1936-2015)
Thoughts on Disappearing Worlds
Stéphane Gros
Grégoire Schlemmer
The ethnologist Philippe Sagant, a specialist of
the Himalayas, passed away on January 10, 2015,
following a long illness which brought his career
to an early end in 1996. A researcher at CNRS
(Centre National de la Recherche Scientiique,
France) since 1966, he leaves behind a
substantial yet litle-known body of scientiic
work, despite the English translation of a large
series of articles, published under the title The
Dozing Shaman (1996a).
The following pages pay tribute to the way
Sagant practiced ethnology while endeavoring
to highlight the main features of his work
through the three main research themes he
developed: 1) the socio-political changes that
afect people living on the margins of the State,
especially through processes of Hinduization
and Buddhicization; 2) the ‘shamanic cultural
background’ predating the arrival of these
great religions; and 3) a comparative approach
to the principles that structure a form of
politico-religious organization characteristic of
these societies. This description will reveal the
wealth of Sagant’s ethnography as well as the
originality of the narrative form of his writings.
The reader will therefore be able to fully
appreciate the unpublished text, “The Death of
a Headman or Shaman’s Logic” which appears in
the Perspectives section of this issue. Our only
regret is that the ideas outlined in this text have
not been taken any further due to the untimely
death of this great research scholar.
HIMALAYA Volume 35, Number 2 | 171
From the University to Himalayan Villages
Having irst shown an interest in literature, and then in
ethnology, Sagant became a student at the École Pratique
des Hautes Études (EPHE, Paris) in 1964. The courses run
by Lucien Bernot, his supervisor, and more generally the
intellectual milieu of the EPHE (6th section; he became a
member of the afiliated Centre d’Études Indiennes since its
founding in 1967) that was to become the École des Hautes
Études en Sciences Sociales (EHESS, Paris, 1975; the centre
was then renamed Centre d’Étude de l’Inde et de l’Asie du Sud),
had a great inluence on Sagant’s vision of ethnology.
Throughout his career, he cited some contemporaries but
almost no theorist, yet he identiied with the approach
of the orientalists and ethnologists who had preceded
him: Marcel Granet, Paul Mus, Evelyne Lot-Falk, Georges
Condominas or Alexander W. Macdonald (he was to pay
tribute to these two colleagues; see 1981b, 1997), among
others. With them he shared a taste for writing, for inegrained ethnography associated with wide-ranging views.
He also shared with them both the will to think the “great
civilizations” of India, China or Tibet and smaller societies
all together with their oral traditions, and the concern for
a diachronic, or even evolutionary, approach. This was the
kind of ethnology that was very dear to him, even though
he admitted that it was from quite another era.
Lucien Bernot has certainly had some inluence on Sagant’s interest for Tibeto-Burman speaking peoples living
on the border with India, Tibet, and Burma. It was, however, Corneille Jest (under whom he had conducted his irst
ethnographic study on a farm in France) who suggested
that Sagant work in the Himalayas. He was to devote his
whole career to this region.
Between 1966 and 1971 he spent two and a half years
in Nepal. This long experience of ieldwork, mainly in
Limbu country (or ‘Yakthumba’ according to their endoethnonym), in the far east of the country, provided him
with a wealth of ethnographic data. It was to provide the
ethnographic substance for all his later work on Limbu
(one book and more than 25 articles). He was never to
return.
Agrarian Changes and The End of a Culture
His doctoral dissertation (defended in 1973, which was the
basis for his irst book, 1976a) focused on the techniques
and the agrarian economy of Limbu society. This interest
was not an end in itself; he always situated these data in a
diachronic perspective because, in his view, they revealed
a slow transformation that he called the ‘Hinduization
process’ which was not to be understood in the religious
sense of the term but as a means of integrating society and
the Indo-Nepalese State (1982a).
172 | HIMALAYA Fall 2015
He put forward three processes of change that were subject to the Indo-Nepalese inluence: the control of landownership by immigrants, the progressive emigration of
Limbu people, and the monetization of the economy. First,
he showed how members of high castes, encouraged by
the Nepalese government, were able to gradually take over
Limbu land (primarily through usury), and that this relationship of dependence gradually led to political and cultural integration (‘The indebted tribal is almost a Hindu,’
1980: 247). Second, he argued that the money brought in
by emigration—and whose beneiciaries are largely dispossessed of it for the beneit of the whole community they
support—served as a kind of safety valve for these people
dispossessed of their land (1978a , b, c). Third, he emphasized that the monetization of the economy subverted the
relationships of mutual aid and inscribed households in
a broader ethnic universe in which the Limbu no longer
mastered the rules (1969a). These themes are in keeping
with the tradition of Marxist anthropology which inspired
Sagant at the time, providing him with the tools to address
the phenomena of state integration and the emergence
of a new multi-ethnic society with class differentiation in
which Limbu became a minority ‘nationality’ (1975b).
The way these themes intersect led Sagant to assert, in
the true spirit of Marcel Mauss, that a social fact is only
important when articulated with other social facts. With
his meticulous ethnographic presentations, he excelled
in showing this interdependence of the different social
registers. He sought institutions or ideas that were the
keystones supporting the whole cultural ediice and thus
found ‘the thread to unravel the round skein like a ball of
the multiple aspects’ of social life (1975a: 4). And his search
was to lead him to the realm of politics, in the broadest
sense of the term.
Among the Limbu, he was interested in the igure of
the headman and the problem of power and legitimacy
(1978d). He defended the idea that the Nepalese government had offered these headmen a set of prerogatives (to
raise taxes, administer justice, etc.) in order to make them
‘its’ local interlocutors and therefore better control them,
which had contributed to maintaining the political independence of the Limbu for a long period of time (1978d).
While Sagant noted that the Limbu had indeed been able
‘to preserve most of their customs,’ he realized that these
institutions had actually been eaten away from the inside
(1976b: 168). He described this process of disintegration by
showing the weight of economic and demographic changes
(1975a) but also how a certain form of political resistance
had maintained the tradition only as a facade (1978d).
It is perhaps partly the nostalgia he felt for ‘this old world
now leaving us’ (1996c: 422), made up of a society of free
Philippe Sagant in Libang
(Taplejung District, Nepal) with
Limbu friends, at end of the 1960s.
(Photographer unknown)
men (1988a), that was to prompt Sagant to focus on what
he called the ‘archaic character’ of institutions of power
and on ‘the survival of ancient traditions’ of the Limbu
(1987a). He believed he could ind traces of them in the
representations associated with the life cycle and in the
ideology of power (1970, 1988a, b). But it was above all in
studying the political and the religious realm (and in particular, shamanism) that he fully exploited this theme.
Local Religious Categories and Their Political Aspects
Parallel to his study on social change, Sagant sought to
highlight the categories of indigenous religions, whether,
for example, through a pragmatic forest-spirit approach
(1969b) or the mobilization of domestic categories as a
guide to think the duality of religious oficiants (‘priest’
versus ‘shaman’) which was preoccupying researchers at
the time (1973b). His work on shamanism led him to pay
special attention to the problem of the shamans’ cure and
their healing power. He brought to light the importance
of the role ‘laypeople’ play in inluencing the divination
diagnosis but also stressed the very ‘talent’ of the shaman
who, with lashes of real insight, knows how to associate
a natural disturbance with a social ban and a kinship issue
with a religious and political idea, legitimizing the rite that
would thus affect just as much sick persons as the maintenance of social order (1982b, 1987b). The body, society, and
the cosmos are nested worlds and, as the sinologist Marcel
Granet wrote: ‘no use acting on the outside if the inside is
not in order’ (a turn of phrase that Sagant loved to quote).
In ‘With head held high: The house, ritual and politics
in east Nepal’ (1981) Sagant focused on the relationship
between a domestic ritual and the political power of the
head of the household. Using ethnographic vignettes, he
showed the political and religious salience of ‘life force,’
which is a central notion among the Limbu, and the lived
implications of the ritual that allow one to hold one’s
‘head high.’ He developed this idea of a wild force linked
to hunting and war and which the gods bestow on those
who deserve it. Certain rituals help to obtain this, and
this gained life force creates the power to act (sometimes
linked to violence, which leads to alliance) and therefore
structures social life. This was a founding principle of the
political organization of the Limbu prior to their integration into Nepal.
This is a pivotal article in Sagant’s research because it
comes as a conclusion to his work on the Limbu. It was at
this time that he explicitly mentioned in his research reports that he had so far worked on the Indianization of the
Limbu, and that he next wanted to reconstruct the system
that predated this transformation (the ‘Asian base’ as Paul
Mus called it).
Comparing Political Formations
From then on, the guiding principle of Sagant’s work
became a holistic and resolutely comparative analysis of
political and religious formations, and of the indigenous
concepts on which they are based. For Sagant, old political
ideologies, some of which were still observable when he
HIMALAYA Volume 35, Number 2 | 173
was in the ield in the 1970-80s, were based on notions of
shame and honor as socio-religious concepts associated
with ‘great men’ and with representations of power which,
in his opinion, have been present throughout the Himalayas since times of old. For this reason he read extensively
about pre-Buddhist historical Tibet and ancient China,
and then went on two ield trips to document these topics
among the Tibetan population in the regions of Manang
and Nyishang (northern Nepal), and Sharwa country in
Amdo (an eastern province of Tibet, China).
The research he started in 1982 with Samten Karmay on
the Sharwa was largely based on discussions between
the two researchers and on a short ield trip in 1985. The
indings were published in the book The nine forces of man
in 1998, when Sagant had already been struck down by
his illness. In this work, the ‘headman elected by the gods’
associated with Sharwa cult of mountains comes across as
a key institution within which Sagant found constellation
of notions that he grouped under the theme of shame and
honor. He noted the importance of a charismatic type of
power linked to a heroic moral that he believed was rooted
in ancient pre-Buddhist Tibet. This power is based on the
life force that the god of the mountain grants and it manifests itself especially during ritual hunts for wild animals
which made up this deity’s herd. A successful hunt, the
transgression of a prohibition, was seen as a favor from
the god. Contrary to shame that causes a person to have a
‘hot face,’ the charisma of the one who is thus ‘elected’ by
the mountain god will decide the seat that will be allocated
to them in local assemblies. This ‘ranked position’ (1988c)
is therefore the expression of shifting social hierarchies
based on whether a person obtains the life force. This
set of institutions reveals an archaic conception of the
‘religion of men’ in which fame and the morality of the feat
give access to political role.
In a key article on the same themes, which was written after a ield trip to Nepal in the Nyishang-Manang region in
1986-1989, Sagant (1990) speciically developed the issue of
political centralization, showing how the King can divert,
for his own beneit, the life force using ritual manipulations, and thus legitimize his power. Then going back to
his Limbu ethnographic data, he examined a conlict of legitimacy between hereditary political leaders delegated by
the King and heads of households to bring out the concept
of ‘dual power’ (1996b).
Time, Space, and Force
Forever in search of general explanatory principles, Sagant
based his comparative analysis of politico-ritual forms of
legitimacy and the nature of power on three elements:
174 | HIMALAYA Fall 2015
time (cyclic), space (open and closed), and life force. He
saw these elements as being systematically mobilized in a
set of institutions and he tried to show their recurrence in
different societies: the head held high and the ranked position, mountain cult and the headman elected by the gods,
or else closing rituals and the law of silence and noise, ritual hunts and creative dismemberment, etc. (some of which
themes had been introduced by Alexander Macdonald).
These representations of power allowed him to detect
some ‘kinship of thought’ within the Himalayan region,
and even beyond. After undertaking substantial bibliographic research, he gradually extended his ield of
investigation to other cultures—from Turkish-Mongolian to Amerindian populations including the Sumerian
civilization—where he found the same system of representations. Very much inspired by Roberte Hamayon, Sagant
considered that these time-, space- and life force-related
notions appeared during the Neolithic period and persisted in some isolated societies to survive as relics. These
concepts correspond to a verticalization of the world,
with the emergence of mountain cult, which is typical of
agro-pastoral societies. It was in this context that the shaman, whose initial function was to obtain game, became a
healing specialist and sometimes served political purposes
(1996c).
According to Sagant, the headman and the shaman share
this life force when they receive the favor or the assistance
of the gods, which makes them ‘masters of the cosmos.’ It
is this force that renders them legitimate and enables them
to ensure some control, which is temporary and subject to
renewal, over causes of disorder, and which gives them the
power to restore internal order, that of the body or that of
the territory and community. Conversely, illness and the
loss of legitimacy are two parallel expressions of supernatural sanctions. These are the ideas which, in the form of a
broad diachronic cross-comparison, Sagant developped in
the following unpublished exploratory essay: ‘The death of
a headman, or shaman’s logic’.
Reading Sagant Today
The attention that Sagant devoted to indigenous logic never amounted to gratuitous efforts at theorizing. His indings about key notions at the heart of systems of thought
which he analyzed enabled him, on the contrary, to identify the relationship between the elements that structure
the whole social ediice. This is true of his thoughts about
space, time, and force, which, regardless of any anthropological current or trend, remain just as relevant today even
beyond the Himalayan region.
Sagant’s concern about accounting for the radical otherness of these disappearing worlds and their underlying
logics also explains his narrative choices. He attempted,
based on the stories told by the main actors, to render the
image that the population has of itself. Life stories, too, are
both a way of inputting ethnographic data and a discursive
tool. Firstly, they do not describe the institutions but show
how they are lived. Then they introduce ‘the cultural gap,
the relativeness, where the thesis, the article, the monograph, have something absolute, abstract’ (1981c: 25). This
is because, for Sagant, the beauty and the truth of a story
are intimately related. ‘What interests me,’ he wrote, ‘is
the quality of the story. If the story is good, very good,
then I am sure it is true. At least I would so much like it to
be!’ (1996d: 420).
This passion for telling stories characterized Sagant’s
choices of writing just as much as his method of teaching.
Throughout his career he strived to disseminate anthropology, as evidenced by how devoted he was to his teaching at the University of Rennes and then at the Laboratoire
d’ethnologie et de sociologie comparative at Nanterre University. Driven by the passion that is relected in his writing
but also by the cogency of the conceptual relationships he
proposed, he has managed to inluence the vision and the
research of those who knew him or read him and, we hope,
those who will continue to read his work.
Readers are advised that Phillipe Sagant’s work, “The Death
of a Headman,” is featured in the Perspectives section of this
issue.
Stéphane Gros is a social anthropologist and researcher
at the Centre for Himalayan Studies, Centre National de la
Recherche Scientiique (C.N.R.S., France). He has published a
monograph entitled La Part Manquante (Société d’ethnologie,
2012) on the Drung (Dulong) of Northwest Yunnan province,
China, and a number of articles on issues of interethnic
relations and ethnic classiication, representations of
ethnic minorities, poverty and categorization. He is Principal
Investigator for a European-Research-Council-funded project
on the Sino-Tibetan Borderlands (Starting Grant No. 283870,
2012-2016), and has served as Managing Editor (2011-2014),
and is now Editor-at-Large for the open-access anthropology
journal HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory.
Grégoire Schlemmer is a social anthropologist and researcher
at Migration and Society (URMIS), Institut de Recherche
pour le Développement (I.R.D. France). His research focuses
on ethnic minorities in two mountainous areas of Asia: the
Kulung Rai of eastern Nepal, and the populations of Phongsaly,
a Laotian province forming the transition between Indochina
and China. His work mainly focuses on religious phenomena
and forms of belonging. Through these topics, he tries to
understand how these populations think the world and, in
doing so, how they act on it. His publications are available on
<htps://ird.academia.edu/schlemmergrégoire>.
The two authors have contributed equally to this article. The
order of names is alphabetical. This text is based on Sagant’s
writings, a short but, for us, memorable personal experience
and on his archives (research reports, unpublished material,
bibliographical notes, etc.) which are housed at the library of the
CNRS research unit, Laboratoire d’éthnologie et de sociologie
comparative: <htp://www.mae.u-paris10.fr/dbtw-wpd/arch/
ar.aspx?archive=lesc&reference=fps>. We are grateful to Vanina
Bouté, Pascale Dollfus, Marc Gaborieau, and Guillaume Rozenberg
for their comments on previous versions of this text; and last but
not least, our thanks go to Bernadete Sellers for her help in turning
this text into proper English.
References
Sagant, Philippe. 1969a. Les marchés en pays limbu (notes
sur trois hat bajar des districts de Taplejung et de Terhathum). L’Ethnographie 20: 90-118. [English translation in
Sagant 1996a]
Sagant, Philippe. 1969b. Tampunma, divinité limbu de la
forêt. Objets et Mondes 9(1): 107-124. [English translation in
Sagant 1996a]
Sagant, Philippe. 1970. Mariage par enlèvement chez les
Limbu (Népal). Cahiers Internationaux de Sociologie 48: 71-98.
[English translation in Sagant 1996a]
HIMALAYA Volume 35, Number 2 | 175
Sagant, Philippe. 1973a. Les travaux et les jours dans un
village du Népal oriental. Objets et Mondes 13(4): 247-272.
[English translation in Sagant 1996a]
Sagant, Philippe. 1973b. Prêtres limbu et catégories domestiques. Kailash 1(1): 51-75. [English translation in Sagant
1996a]
Sagant, Philippe. 1975a. Nationalité et état-nation: L’exemple de l’intégration politique des Limbu du Népal. Pluriel 2:
3-20. [English translation in Sagant 1996a]
Gallissot, René and Philippe Sagant. 1975b. Les Limbu:
groupe ethnique ou nationalité ? Pluriel 2: 75-92.
Sagant, Philippe. 1976a. Le paysan Limbu, sa maison et ses
champs. Paris: Mouton.
Sagant, Philippe. 1976b. Les Limbu, population du Népal
oriental. L’Ethnographie 72: 146-173.
Sagant, Philippe. 1978a. Ampleur et profondeur historique
des migrations népalaises. L’Ethnographie 77-78: 93-119.
Sagant, Philippe. 1978b. Du village vers la ville et la plantation. L’Ethnographie 77-78: 11-33.
Sagant, Philippe. 1978c. “Quand le Gurkha revient de
guerre...”. L’Ethnographie 77-78: 155-184. [English translation
in Sagant 1996a]
Sagant, Philippe. 1978d. Les pouvoirs des chefs limbu au
Népal oriental. L’Homme 18(1-2): 69-107. [English translation
in Sagant 1996a]
Sagant, Philippe. 1980. Usuriers et chefs de clan: Ethnographie de la dette au Népal oriental. In La dette, edited by
Charles Malamoud, 227-277. Paris: Ecole des Hautes Etudes
en Sciences Sociales (collection Purusartha n° 4). [English
translation in Sagant 1996a]
Sagant, Philippe. 1981a. La tête haute: maison, rituel et politique au Népal oriental. In L’Homme et la maison en Himalaya:
Ecologie du Népal, edited by Gérard Tofin, Luc Barré and
Corneille Jest, 149-180. Paris: Centre National de la Recherche Scientiique. [English translations: 1985. With head held
high: The house, ritual and politics in east Nepal. Kailash
12(3-4): 161-222; and Sagant 1996a]
Sagant, Philippe. 1981b. Le ils des Quatre Orients. In Orients,
Hommage à Georges Condominas, edited by P. Sagant, 1-8. Paris:
Sud-Est Asie-Privat.
Sagant, Philippe. 1981c. Les gardiens de la banque. Histoires
de vie et autres histoires. In Tud Ha Bro, Sociétés bretonnes 6,
21-39. Rennes: Editions de l’Université de Haute Bretagne.
Sagant, Philippe. 1982a. L’hindouisation des Limbu. In
Les royaumes de l’Himalaya, histoire et civilisation, edited by
176 | HIMALAYA Fall 2015
Alexander MacDonald, 165-239. Paris: Imprimerie Nationale.
Sagant, Philippe. 1982b. Le chamane et la grêle. L’Ethnographie 78 (87-88): 163-174. [English translation in Sagant 1996a]
Sagant, Philippe. 1987a. Traditions enfantines: L’apprentissage des techniques au Népal oriental. In De la voûte céleste
au terroir, du jardin au foyer, edited by Bernard Koechlin,
François Sigaut, Jacqueline Thomas, and Gérard Tofin,
629-635. Paris: Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes en Sciences
Sociales. [English translation in Sagant 1996a]
Sagant, Philippe. 1987b. La cure du chamane et l’interprétation des laïcs. L’Ethnographie 83: 247-274. [English translations: 1988. The shaman’s cure and the layman’s interpretation. Kailash 14(1-2): 5-40; and Sagant 1996a]
Sagant, Philippe. 1988a. Le vol des connaissances. Autrement,
Hors série 28: 101-108.
Sagant, Philippe. 1988b. Le rapt d’une femme. Autrement,
Hors série 28: 113-121.
Karmay, Samten and Philippe Sagant. 1988c. La place du
rang dans la maison sharwa (Amdo ancien). In Architecture,
milieu et société en Himalaya, edited by Denis Blamont and
Gérard Tofin, 229-260. Paris: Editions du CNRS (Etudes
himalayennes n° 1).
Sagant, Philippe. 1990. Les tambours de Nyi-shang (Népal):
Rituel et centralisation politique. In Tibet: Civilisation et
société, edited by Fernand Meyer, 151-170. Paris: Fondation
Singer-Polignac, Maison des Sciences de l’Homme.
Sagant, Philippe. 1996a. The Dozing Shaman: The Limbus of eastern
Nepal, translated by Nora Scott. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Sagant, Philippe. 1996b. Dasai et le double pouvoir chez les
Yakthumba. In Célébrer le pouvoir: Dasai, une fête royale au
Népal, edited by Gisèle Krauskopff and Marie Lecomte-Tilouine, 283-314. Paris: Editions du CNRS, Maison des Sciences de
l’Homme.
Sagant, Philippe. 1996c. De la chasse à l’élevage. A propos de
La chasse à l’âme. Esquisse d’une théorie du chamanisme sibérien,
by Roberte Hamayon. L’Homme 36(138): 127-135.
Sagant, Philippe. 1996d. Les récits du chasseur. In Traditions
orales dans le monde indien, edited by Catherine Champion,
419-428. Paris: Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales
(collection Purusartha n° 18).
Karmay, Samten and Philippe Sagant, eds. 1997. Les habitants
du toit du monde. Etudes recueillies en hommage à Alexander W.
Macdonald. Nanterre: Société d’Ethnologie.
Karmay, Samten and Philippe Sagant. 1998. Les neuf forces
de l’homme. Récits des conins du Tibet. Nanterre: Société
d’Ethnologie.