Bibliography on Metaethical Constructivism, almost complete

Bibliography Ethical Constructivism, almost complete carla.bagnoli@gmail.com updated 7.1.2023 Allison, Henry E. (2006). Kant’s Transcendental Idealism. In Graham. Bird, ed., Companion to Kant. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 111–24. Ameriks, Karl. (2003). On Two Non-Realist Interpretations of Kant’s Ethics. In Karl Ameriks, Interpreting Kant’s Critiques. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 263–82. Archard, David, Monique Deveaux, Neil Manson, and Daniel Weinstock, eds. (2013). Reading Onora O’Neill. London: Routledge. Arruda, Caroline T. (2017a). The Varieties of Moral Improvement, Or Why Metaethical Constructivism Must Explain Moral Progress. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 20(1): 17–38. Arruda, Caroline T. (2017b). Why Care About Being an Agent. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 95(3): 488–504. Arruda, Caroline T. (2018). Why Moral Status Matters for Metaethics. Journal of the American Philosophical Association, 4(4): 471–90. Bacin, Stefano, Bagnoli, Carla. Eds. (forthcoming) Reason, Agency, and Ethics: Kantian themes in contemporary debates, Oxford University Press, under contract Bagnoli, Carla. (2000). “La pretesa di oggettività in etica”, Modi dell’oggettività, G. Usberti Ed., Milano: Bompiani, 7-22 Bagnoli, Carla. (2002). Moral Constructivism: A Phenomenological Argument. Topoi, 21: 125–38. Bagnoli, Carla. (2004). “Costruttivismo kantiano”, in Le ragioni dell’etica, Pisa: ETS, 63-84 Bagnoli, Carla. (2007). “Costruttivismo kantiano” in Oggettività in etica, G. Bongiovanni ed., Milano: Mondadori, 257-276 Bagnoli, Carla. (2009). “Review of C.M. Korsgaard, The Constitution of Agency”, Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 06/2009 Bagnoli, Carla. (2009). “Review of Charles Larmore, The Autonomy of Morality”, The Philosophical Review, 118/4: 536-540. Bagnoli, Carla. (2009). “The Appeal of Kantian Intuitionism. Critical Notice on Robert Audi”, European Journal of Philosophy, 17/1: 152-158 Bagnoli, Carla. (2012). “Review of Stephen Engstrom, The Form of Practical Knowledge”, European Journal of Philosophy, 20/2 (2012): 340-345. Bagnoli, Carla. (2013). Constructivism About Practical Knowledge. In Bagnoli 2013, pp. 153–82. Bagnoli, Carla. (2014). “L’argomento costruttivista contro l’empirismo”, Bollettino Filosofico, 29 (2014) Bagnoli, Carla. (2015). Review of David Archard, Monique Deveaux, Neil Manson, and Daniel Weinstock (eds.), Reading Onora O’Neill”, Ethics, 125/4: 1184-1189. Bagnoli, Carla. (2017a). Constructivism in Metaethics. In Edward N. Zalta, ed., Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/ win2017/entries/constructivism-metaethics/. Bagnoli, Carla. (2017b). Constructivism and the Moral Problem. Philosophia, 44(4): 1229–46. Bagnoli, Carla. (2017c). Kant in Metaethics: The Paradox of Autonomy, Solved by Publicity. In Matthew Altman, ed., The Palgrave Kant Handbook/Palgrave Handbooks in German Idealism. London: Palgrave Macmillan: 355–77. Bagnoli, Carla. (2018). Defeaters and Practical Knowledge. Synthese, 195(7): 2855–75. Bagnoli, Carla. (2019a). Ethical objectivity: The test of time. Ratio 32 (4):325-338. Bagnoli, Carla. (2019b). Authority as a Contingency Plan. Philosophical Explorations, 22(2): 130–45. Bagnoli, Carla. (2020a). “Equal Standing and Proper Reliance on Others”, Theoria, 86/6 (2020): 821-425 Bagnoli, Carla. (2020b). “Sidgwick and Kant on Practical Knowledge and Rational Action”, in Tyler Paytas & Tim Henning Eds. Kantian and Sidgwickian Ethics: The Cosmos of Duty Above and the Moral Law Within London: Routledge, 61-83 1 Bagnoli, Carla. (2021a). “Respect and the Dynamics of Finitude”, in Richard Dean & Oliver Sensen (eds.), Respect Oxford: Oxford University Press: 121-139 Bagnoli, Carla. (2021b). The Practical Significance of the Categorical Imperative. Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics, 11: 178–99. Bagnoli, Carla. (2022a). “Il metodo costruttivista”, in R. Lanfredini (ed.), Metodi, stili e orientamenti della filosofia, Roma: Carocci, 81-97. Bagnoli, Carla. (2022b). “Kantian Constructivism and the naturalist constraint”, Routledge Handbook on Liberal Naturalism, ed. by Mario De Caro, chapt. 27. Bagnoli, Carla. (2022c). “The Form of Practical Thought”, in Thinking and Calculating, F. Ademollo, F. Amerini, & V. De Risi Eds. Springer, 2022, 433-450. Bagnoli, Carla. (2022d). Ethical Constructivism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Bagnoli, Carla. (forthcoming). “The Ekstatic View of the Will: A critical notice of Tamar Schapiro, Feeling Like It: A Theory of Inclination and the Will”, Analysis Reviews, forthcoming 2023 Bagnoli, Carla. (forthcoming). “The Predicament of Temporality: Williams’ challenge to Kant’s conception of practical reason”, M. Queloz and M. van Ackeren, eds. Williams and the History of Philosophy, Oxford University Press, forthcoming 2023. Bagnoli, Carla. (forthcoming). The Burden of History: a challenge to Kantian Constitutivism solved by appealing to practical attitudes, in Bacin and Bagnoli Eds., Reason, Agency, and Ethics: Kantian themes in contemporary debates, Oxford University Press. Bagnoli, Carla, Ed. (2013). Constructivism in Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Baiasu, Sorin. (2016). Constitutivism and Transcendental Practical Philosophy: How to Pull the Rabbit Out of the Hat. Philosophia, 44(4): 1185–208. Baiasu Sorin. (2020). Staying Philosophically on the Surface: Constitutivist and Naturalist Quests for Normativity. In Reason, Normativity and Law: New Essays in Kantian Philosophy. University of Wales Press Baldwin, Thomas. (2013). Constructive Complaints. In Bagnoli 2013, pp. 201–20. Barry, Melissa. (2013). Constructivist Practical Reasoning and Objectivity. In Archard et al. 2013, pp. 17–36. Besch, Thomas M. (2008). Constructing Practical Reason: O’Neill On the Grounds of Kantian Constructivism. Journal of Value Inquiry, 42(1): 55–76. Besch, Thomas M. (2011). Kantian Constructivism, the Issue of Scope, And Perfectionism: O’Neill On Ethical Standing. European Journal of Philosophy, 19(1): 1–20. Bird-Pollan, Stephan (2011). Some Normative Implications of Korsgaard’s Theory of the Intersubjectivity of Reason. Metaphilosophy, 42(4): 376–80. Bratman, Michael E. (1998). The Sources of Normativity. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 58(3): 699– 709. Bratman, Michael E. (2012). Constructivism, Agency, and the Problem of Alignment. In Lenman and Shemmer 2012. Brennan, Geoffrey, Eriksson, Lina, Goodin, Robert E. and Southwood, Nicholas. (2013). Explaining Norms. New York: Oxford University Press. Brink, David O. (1989). Moral Realism and the Foundations of Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Brink, David O. (1992). A Puzzle about the Rational Authority of Morality. Philosophical Perspectives 6:1-26. Broome, John. (2005). Does Rationality Give Us Reasons? Philosophical Issues, 15: 321–37. Cholbi, Michael J. (1999). Egoism and the Publicity of Reason: A Reply to Korsgaard. Social Theory and Practice, 25(3): 491–517. Cohen, Gerald A. (1996). Reason, Humanity, and the Moral Law. In Gerald A. Cohen, Raymond Geuss, Thomas Nagel, and Bernard Williams, eds., The Sources of Normativity. Cambridge University Press, pp. 167–88. Cokelet, Bradford. (2008). Ideal Agency and the Possibility of Error. Ethics, 118(2): 315–23. Copp, David. (1995). Morality, Normativity, and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Copp, David. (2005). “A Skeptical Challenge to Moral Non-Naturalism and a Defense of Constructivist Naturalism”, Philosophical Studies, 126(2): 269–283. 2 Copp, David. (2008). Darwinian Skepticism About Moral Realism. Philosophical Issues, 18(1): 186–206. Copp, David (2015). Rationality and Moral Authority. Oxford Studies in Metaethics 10: 134-159 Cullity, Garrett and Berys Gaut eds., 1997, Ethics and Practical Reason, Oxford: Clarendon Press. Darwall, Stephen. (2006). The Second Person Standpoint: Morality, Respect, and Accountability. Harvard University Press Darwall, Stephen, Gibbard, Allan, and Railton, Peter. (1992). Toward fin de siècle Ethics: Some Trends. The Philosophical Review, 101: 115–89. Reprinted in Stephen Darwall, Allan Gibbard, and Peter Railton, eds. (1997). Moral Discourse and Practice. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–47. Dorsey, Dale. (2018). A Perfectionist Humean Constructivism. Ethics, 128(3): 574–602. Driver, Julia. (2017). Contingency and Constructivism. In Simon Kirchin, ed., Reading Parfit. London: Routledge, pp. 172–88. Engstrom, Stephen. (2009). The Form of Practical Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Engstrom, Stephen. (2013). Constructivism and Practical Knowledge. In Bagnoli 2013, pp. 133–52. Enoch, David. (2006). Agency, Shmagency: Why Normativity Won’t Come from What Is Constitutive of Agency. Philosophical Review, 115: 169–98. Enoch, David. (2009).Can ThereBe a Global, Interesting, Coherent Constructivism About Practical Reason? Philosophical Explorations, 12: 319–39. Enoch, David. (2011). Shmagency revisited. In Michael Brady (ed.), New Waves in Metaethics. Palgrave-Macmillan Ferrero, Luca. (2009). Constitutivism and the Inescapability of Agency. Oxford Studies in Metaethics, 4: 303–33. Ferrero, Luca. (2019). The Simple Constitutivist Move. Philosophical Explorations, 22(2): 146–62. Fitzpatrick, William J. (2005). The Practical Turn in Ethical Theory: Korsgaard’s Constructivism, Realism and the Nature of Normativity. Ethics, 115: 651–91. FitzPatrick, William J. (2013). How Not to Be an Ethical Constructivist: A Critique of Korsgaard’s Neo-Kantian Constitutivism. In Bagnoli 2013, pp. 41–62. Fix, Jeremy David. (2020). The Error Condition. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 50(1): 34–48. Fix, Jeremy David. (2021). Two Sorts of Constitutivism. Analytic Philosophy, 62(1): 1–20. Foot, Philippa. (1972). Morality as a system of hypothetical imperatives. Philosophical Review, 81 (3):305-316. Frankfurt, Harry G. (2004). Reasons of Love. NJ: Princeton University Press. Frankfurt, Harry G. (2006). Taking Ourselves Seriously and Getting It Right. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Galvin, Richard. (2011). Rounding Up the Usual Suspects: Varieties of Kantian Constructivism in Ethics. The Philosophical Quarterly, 61(242): 16–36. Gaut, Berys. (1997). The Structure of Practical Reason. In Garrett Cullity and Berys Gaut, eds., Ethics and Practical Reason. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp.161–88. Gauthier, David. (1986). Morals by Agreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Gibbard, Allan. (1990). Wise Choices, Apt Feelings: A Theory of Normative Judgement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Gibbard, Allan. (1999). Morality as Consistency in Living. Ethics, 110: 140–64. Gledhill, James and Sebastian Stein, eds. (2020). Hegel and Contemporary Practical Philosophy: Beyond Kantian Constructivism. London: Routledge. Gobsch,Wolfram. (2019). Autonomy and Radical Evil: A Kantian Challenge to Constitutivism. Philosophical Explorations, 22(2): 194–207. Gowans, Christopher W. (2002). Practical Identities and Autonomy: Korsgaard’s Reformation of Kant’s Moral Philosophy. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 64(3): 546–70. Guyer, Paul. (2013). Constructivism and Self-Constitution. In Mark Timmons and Sorin Baiasu, eds., Kant on Practical Justification: Interpretive Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 176–200. Guyer, Paul. (2017) The Virtues of Freedom, Oxford University Press. Herman, Barbara. (2008). Moral Literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 3 Herman, Barbara. (2000). Editor’s Forward, in John Rawls, Lectures on the History of Moral Philosophy. Harvard University Press, pp. x-xix. Hill, Thomas Jr. E. (1989). Kantian Constructivism in Ethics. Ethics, 99: 752–70. Hill, Thomas Jr. E. (1994). Respect for Humanity. Tanner Lectures on Human Values. CA: Stanford University Press. Hill, Thomas Jr. E. (2001). Hypothetical Consent in Kantian Constructivism. Social Philosophy and Policy, 18: 300– 29. Reprinted in Hill, Thomas.Jr. E. (2002). Human Welfare and Moral Worth: Kantian Perspectives. Oxford University Press, pp. 61–95. Hill, Thomas Jr. E. (2008). Moral Construction as a Task: Sources and Limits. Social Philosophy and Policy, 25(1): 214–36. Hussain, Nadeem and Shah, Nishi. (2006). Misunderstanding Metaethics: Korsgaard’s Rejection of Realism. Oxford Studies in Metaethics, 1: 265–94. James, Aaron. (2007). Constructivism About Practical Reasons. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 74(2): 302–25. James, Aaron. (2012). Constructing Protagoreon Objectivity. In Lenman and Shemmer 2012, pp. 60–80. Katsafanas, Paul. (2018). Constitutivism About Practical Reasons. In Daniel Star, ed., The Oxford Handbook of Reasons and Normativity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 367–94. Korsgaard, Christine M. (1989). Personal Identity and the Unity of Agency: A Kantian Response to Parfit. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 18(2): 103–31. Korsgaard, Christine M. (1996a). Sources of Normativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Korsgaard, Christine M. (1996b). Creating the Kingdom of Ends. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Korsgaard, Christine M. (1997). The Normativity of Instrumental Reason. In G. Cullity and B. Gaut eds., Ethics and Practical Reason. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Reprinted in Korsgaard 2008, pp. 27–68. Korsgaard, Christine M. (1998). Motivation, Metaphysics, and the Value of Self. Ethics, 109: 49–66. Korsgaard, Christine M. (2003). Realism and Constructivism in Twentieth-Century Moral Philosophy. The Journal of Philosophical Research, APA Centennial Supplement, Philosophy in America at the End of the Century, 2003: 99–122. Korsgaard, Christine M. (2008). The Constitution of Agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Korsgaard, Christine M. (2008). The General Point of View: Love and Moral Approval in Hume’s Ethics. In Korsgaard 2009, pp.263–301. Korsgaard, Christine M. (2009). Self-Constitution: Action, Identity and Integrity. Oxford University Press. Korsgaard, Christine M. (2011). Natural Goodness, Rightness, and the Intersubjectivity of Reason: Reply to Arroyo, Cummiskey, Moland, and Bird-Pollan. Metaphilosophy, 42(4): 381–94. Korsgaard, Christine M. (2019). Constitutivism and the Virtues. Philosophical Explorations, 22(2): 98–116. Krasnoff, Larry. (1999). How Kantian Is Constructivism? Kant-Studien, 90 (90): 385–409. Laitinen, Arto. (2020). Finding by Making: The Mediating Role of Social Constructions, Commitments, and Resonance in Hegelian Normative Realism. In Gledhill and Stein 2020, chapter 8. Lavin, Douglas. (2004). Practical Reason and the Possibility of Error. Ethics, 114: 424–57. LeBar, Mark. (2005). Eudaimonist Autonomy. American Philosophical Quarterly, 42(3): 171–83. Lebar, Mark. (2008). Aristotelian Constructivism. Social Philosophy and Policy, 25(1): 182–213. Lebar, Mark. (2013). Constructivism and Particularism. In Bagnoli 2013, pp.183–200. Leffler, Olof. (2019). New Shmagency Worries. Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy, 15(2): 121–45. Lenman, James. (1998). Review of Korsgaard's Creating the Kingdom of Ends.Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 1 (4):487-8. Lenman, James. (2010). “Humean Constructivism in Moral Theory”, Oxford Studies in Metaethics, 5: 175–193. Lenman, James. (2012). “Expressivism and Contructivism”. In Lenman & Shemmer 2012: 213–25. Lenman, James and Shemmer, Yonatan. (2012). Constructivism in Practical Philosophy. Oxford University Press. Moland, Lydia. (2011). Agency and Practical Identity: A Hegelian Response to Korsgaard. Metaphilosophy, 42(4): 368–75. 4 Nagel, Thomas. (1996). Universality and the reflective self. In C. Korsgaard, The Sources of Normativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 200-209. O’Neill, Onora. (1975). Acting on Principle. NY: Columbia University Press. O’Neill, Onora. (1989). Constructions of Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. O’Neill, Onora. (1996). Toward Justice and Virtue: A Constructivist Account of Practical Reasoning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. O’Neill, Onora. (1999). “Kantian Constructivisms”, in Rationalität, Realismus, Revision. Vorträge des 3. internationalen Kongresses der Gesellschaft für Analytische Philosophie vom 15. bis zum 18. September 1997 in München, Julian Nida-Rümelin, ed., Berlin, New York: De Gruyter, pp. 3–16. O’Neill, Onora. (2003). Constructivism in Rawls and Kant. In Samuel. Freeman, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Rawls. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 347–67. O’Neill, Onora. (2015). Constructing Authorities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. O’Shea, James. (2006). Conceptual Connections: Kant and the Twentieth- Century Analytic Tradition. In Graham. Bird, ed., Companion to Kant. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 513–26. Ostritsch, Sebastian. (2020). Hegel’s Metaethical Non-Constructivism. In Gledhill and Stein 2020, chapter 4. Pollok, Konstantin. (2017). Kant’s Farewell to Perfectionism. In Pollok, Kant’s Theory of Normativity: Exploring the Space of Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 27–57. Rawls, John. (1951). Outline of a Decision Procedure for Ethics. Philosophical Review, 60(2): 177–97. Reprinted in Samuel. Freeman, ed. (1999). Collected Papers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–19. Rawls, John (1955). Two Concepts of Rules. Philosophical Review 64 (1):3-32. Rawls, John. (1980). Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory. Journal of Philosophy, 77: 515–72. Reprinted in Samuel. Freeman, ed. (1999). Collected Papers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 303–58. Rawls, John. (1989). Themes in Kant’s Moral Philosophy. Reprinted in Samuel. Freeman, ed. (1999). Collected Papers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 497–528. Rawls, John. (1993). Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press. Rawls, John. (2000). Lectures on the History of Moral Philosophy. Edited by Barbara Herman, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Reath, Andrews. (2006). Agency and Autonomy in Kant’s Moral Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Richardson, Henry. (2013). Revising Moral Norms: Pragmatism and the Problem of Perspicuous Description. In Bagnoli 2013, pp. 221–42. Richardson, Henry. (2018). Articulating the Moral Community. New York: Oxford University Press. Ridge, Michael. (2012). Kantian constructivism: something old, something new. In James Lenman & Yonatan Shemmer eds., Constructivism in Practical Philosophy. Oxford University Press. Ronzoni, Miriam. (2010). Constructivism and Practical Reason: On Intersubjectivity, Abstraction, and Judgement. The Journal of Moral Philosophy, 4: 74–104. Saemi, Amir. (2016). The Form of Practical Knowledge and Implicit Cognition: A Critique of Kantian Constitutivism. Social Theory and Practice, 42(4): 733–47. Scanlon, Thomas M. (1998). What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge, MA: Bellknap Press. Scanlon, Thomas M. (2002). Rawls on Justification. In Samuel. Freeman, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Rawls. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 139–67. Scanlon, Thomas M. (2003). Metaphysics and Morals. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 77(2): 7–22. Scanlon, Thomas M. (2007). Structural Irrationality. In Geoffrey Brennan, Robert E. Goodin, Frank Jackson, and Michael Smith, eds., Common Minds: Themes from the Philosophy of Philip Pettit. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 84–103. Scanlon, Thomas M. (2012). “The Appeal and Limits of Constructivism”, in Lenman and Shemmer 2012a: 226–42. Scanlon, Thomas M. (2014). Being Realistic About Reasons. New York: Oxford University Press. Schafer, Karl. (forthcoming). Practical Cognition and Knowledge of Things-in-Themselves. In Evan Tiffany and Dai Heide, eds., Kantian Freedom.New York: Oxford University Press. 5 Schafer, Karl. (2014). Constructivism and Three Forms of Perspective-Dependence in Metaethics. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 89(1): 68–101. Schafer, Karl. (2015a). Realism and Constructivism in Kantian Metaethics 1: Realism and Constructivism in a Kantian Context. Philosophy Compass, 10: 690–701. Schafer, Karl. (2015b). Realism and Constructivism in Kantian Metaethics 2: The Kantian Conception of Rationality and Rationalist Constructivism. Philosophy Compass, 10: 702–13. Schafer, Karl. (2018). A Kantian Virtue Epistemology: Rational Capacities and Transcendental Arguments. Synthese, 198(Suppl 13): 3113–36. Schafer, Karl. (2019a). Kant: Constitutivism as Capacities-First Philosophy. Philosophical Explorations, 22(2): 177– 93. Shafer-Landau, Russ. (2003). Moral Realism. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Skorupski, John. (1998). Rescuing moral obligation. European Journal of Philosophy 6 (3): 335–355. Skorupski, John. (2010). The Domain of Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Smith, Michael. (1994). The Moral Problem. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Smith, Michael. (1999). Search for the Source. The Philosophical Quarterly, 49: 384–94. Smith, Michael. (2013). A Constitutivist Theory of Reasons: Its Promise and Parts. Law, Ethics and Philosophy, 1: 9–30. Smith, Michael. (2015). The Magic of Constitutivism. American Philosophical Quarterly, 52(2): 187–200. Southwood, Nicholas. (2008). Vindicating the Normativity of Rationality. Ethics, 119: 9–30. Southwood, Nicholas. (2018). Constructivism About Reason. In Daniel Star, ed., The Oxford Handbook of Reasons and Normativity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 342–66. Stein, Sebastian. (2020). Choosing to Do the Right Thing: Aristotle, Kant, and Hegel on Practical Normativity and the Realism-Constructivism Debate. In Gledhill and Stein 2020, chapter 2. Stern, Robert. (2000). Transcendental Arguments: Answering the Question of Justification. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 75-94. Stern, Robert. (2011). The Value of Humanity: Reflections on Korsgaard’s Transcendental Argument. In J. Smith and P. Sullivan, eds., Transcendental Philosophy and Naturalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 74– 95. Stern, Robert. (2012). Understanding Moral Obligation: Kant, Hegel, Kierkegaard. Cambridge University Press. Stern, Robert. (2013). Moral Skepticism, Constructivism and the Value of Humanity. In Bagnoli 2013, pp. 22–40. Stevenson, Charles Leslie. (1937). The emotive meaning of ethical terms. Mind 46 (181):14-31. Street, Sharon. (2006). A Darwinian Dilemma for Realist Theories of Value. Philosophical Studies, 127(1): 109−66. Street, Sharon. (2008a). Constructivism About Reasons. Oxford Studies in Metaethics, 3: 207–45. Street, Sharon. (2008b). Reply to Copp: Naturalism, Normativity, and the Varieties of Realism Worth Worrying About. Philosophical Issues, 18(1): 207–28. Street, Sharon. (2009). In Defense of Future Tuesday’ Indifference: Ideally Coherent Eccentrics and the Contingency of What Matters. Philosophical Issues, 19(1): 273–98. Street, Sharon. (2010). What is Constructivism in Ethics and Metaethics? Philosophy Compass, 5: 363–84. Street, Sharon. (2011). Mind-Independence without the Mystery: Why Quasi-Realists Can’t Have It Both Ways. In Russ Shafer-Landau, ed., Oxford Studies in Metaethics, Volume 6. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1– 32. Street, Sharon. (2012). “Coming to Terms with Contingency: Humean Constructivism about Practical Reason”, Lenman and Shemmer 2012, pp. 40–59. Tenenbaum, Sergio. (2019). Formalism and Constitutivism in Kantian Practical Philosophy. Philosophical Explorations, 22(2): 163–76. Thompson, Michael J. (2020). Critical Agency in Hegelian Ethics: Social Metaphysics versus Moral Constructivism. In Gledhill and Stein 2020, chapter 10. Tiffany, Evan. (2006). How Kantian Must Kantian Constructivists Be? Inquiry, 49: 524–46. Timmons, Mark. (2003). The Limits of Moral Constructivism. Ratio, 16(4): 391–423. 6 Timmons, Mark ed. (2015). Reason, Value, and Respect: Kantian Themes from the Philosophy of Thomas E. Hill, Jr. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Timmons, Mark. (2017). Significance and System: Essays on Kant’s Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Tropman, Elizabeth (2014). Evolutionary debunking arguments: moral realism, constructivism, and explaining moral knowledge. Philosophical Explorations 17 (2):126-140. Tubert, Ariela (2010). Constitutive arguments. Philosophy Compass 5 (8):656-666. Walden, Kenneth. (2012). Laws of Nature, Laws of Freedom, and the Social Construction of Normativity. In Russ Shafer-Landau, ed., Oxford Studies in Metaethics, 7: 37–79. Walden, Kenneth. (2018). Practical Reason Not as Such. Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy, 2: 127–52. Wallace, R. Jay. (2019). The Moral Nexus. NJ: Princeton University Press. Watkins, Eric and Fitzpatrick, William. (2002). O’Neill and Korsgaard on the Construction of Normativity. Journal of Value Inquiry, 36: 349–67. Westphal, Kenneth R. (2016). How Hume and Kant Reconstruct Natural Law: Justifying Strict Objectivity without Debating Moral Realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Westphal, Kenneth R. (2017). Hegel’s Natural Law Constructivism: Progress in Principle and in Practice. In T. Brooks and S. Stein, eds., Hegel’s Political Philosophy: On the Normative Significance of Method and System. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 253–79. Williams, Bernard A.O. (1996). History, Morality, and the Test of Reflection. In Christine M. Korsgaard and Onora O’Neill, eds., The Sources of Normativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 210–18. Wong, David. (2008). Constructing Normative Objectivity in Ethics. Social Philosophy and Policy, 25(1): 237–66. Wood, Allen W. (1995). Attacking Morality: A Metaethical Project. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 25: 221–49. Wood, Allen W. (1999). Kant’s Ethical Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Wood, Allen W. (2017). How a Kantian Decides What to Do. In Matthew Altman, ed., The Palgrave Kant Handbook/Palgrave Handbooks in German Idealism. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 263–84. Wretzel, Joshua I. (2020). Constraint and the Ethical Agent: Hegel Between Constructivism and Realism. In Gledhill and Stein 2020, chapter 3. Yeomans, Christopher. (2020). Historical Constructivism. In Gledhill and Stein 2020, chapter 9. 7