May Peyron Spangler
Paris in Architecture,
Literature, and Art
PETER LANG
New York y Bern y Berlin
Brussels y Vienna y Oxford y Warsaw
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Names: Spangler, May.
Title: Paris in architecture, literature and art / May Peyron Spangler.
Description: New York: Peter Lang, 2018.
Includes bibliographical references.
Identifiers: LCCN 2016043874 | ISBN 978-1-4331-3958-1 (hardback: alk. paper)
ISBN 978-1-4331-3535-4 (paperback: alk. paper) | ISBN 978-1-4331-3959-8 (ebook pdf)
ISBN 978-1-4331-3960-4 (epub) | ISBN 978-1-4331-3961-1 (mobi)
Subjects: LCSH: Paris (France)-----Intellectual life. | Paris (France)-----Description and travel.
French literature-----France-----Paris. | Architecture-----France-----Paris.
Art, French-----France-----Paris. | Historic buildings-----France-----Paris.
Paris (France)-----Buildings, structures, etc. | Paris (France)-----History.
Classification: LCC DC715 .S673 2017 | DDC 700/.45844361-----dc23
LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2016043874
DOI 10.3726/978-1-4331-3959-8
Bibliographic information published by Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek.
Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the ‘‘Deutsche
Nationalbibliografie’’; detailed bibliographic data are available
on the Internet at http://dnb.d-nb.de/.
The paper in this book meets the guidelines for permanence and durability
of the Committee on Production Guidelines for Book Longevity
of the Council of Library Resources.
© 2018 Peter Lang Publishing, Inc., New York
29 Broadway, 18th floor, New York, NY 10006
www.peterlang.com
All rights reserved.
Reprint or reproduction, even partially, in all forms such as microfilm,
xerography, microfiche, microcard, and offset strictly prohibited.
Printed in the United States of America
Contents
Illustrations
1
Walls of Paris
1.1 Rive Droite and Rive Gauche: Anthony Sutcliffe,
The Autumn of Central Paris, 1970
1.2 Gallo-Roman Lutetia, 52 BC–4C
1.2.1 River and Marsh of Lutetia: Gaius Julius Caesar,
The Conquest of Gaul, 59–44 BC
1.2.2 Cardo Maximus in Orthogonal Lutetia, 2–4C
1.2.3 Roman and Gallic Cohabitation:
Lutetia in Astérix, 1962–1972
1.3 Christianity in Paris: Figuring the Invisible
1.3.1 Saint Denis the Cephalophore:
Jacobus de Voragine, The Golden Legend or
Lives of the Saints, 1275
1.3.2 Literal and Figural Walls: Moine Yves,
Life of Saint Denis, 1317
1.4 Barbarian Invasions: Geneviève, Clotilde and Clovis, c. 500
1.4.1 Geneviève, Guardian of the Walls:
Life of Sainte Geneviève, 520
1.4.2 Clovis, First Catholic King of France
xiii
1
4
6
6
8
11
12
12
14
17
17
20
vi
| Paris in Architecture, Literature, and Art
1.5
2
Medieval Paris: Philippe Auguste and Charles V Walls,
1213 and 1383
1.5.1 The New King Enters the City
1.5.2 Allegories of the Garden Wall: Guillaume de
Lorris, The Romance of the Rose, 1237–75
1.6 Classical and Modern Paris: From Walls to Boulevards
and Périphérique
1.6.1 Expanding to the West: Louis XIII Wall of the
Fossés Jaunes, 1634; Mathieu Merian,
Le Plan de la Ville, 1615
1.6.2 Unpopular 18C Farmers-General Wall, 1784–91:
Maurice-Antoine Moithey, Plan des enceintes
de Paris, 1787
1.6.3 Haussmann’s 19C Restructuration of Paris:
Edouard Dumas Vorzet, Paris and
Its Surroundings, 1878
1.6.4 Modern Paris and Beyond
Gothic Paris: Notre-Dame and the Île de la Cité
2.1 The Gothic Experience of Light
2.1.1 What Is an Esthetic Experience?
2.1.2 The Anagogical Path to Light: Abbot Suger,
On What Was Done During His Administration,
1144–48
2.1.3 Flexible Gothic Arch: Sir Banister Fletcher,
A History of Architecture on the
Comparative Method, 1896
2.2 Île de la Cité, East Side: Religious Power
2.2.1 Gothic Notre-Dame, 1163–1245
2.2.2 Comparison of Romanesque
Saint-Germain-des-Prés, 990–1014,
and Gothic Notre-Dame, 1163–1245
2.2.3 Notre-Dame’s Portal of the Last Judgment:
Hoffbauer, Paris à travers les âges, 1998
2.2.4 Rose Windows at Notre-Dame
2.3 Abélard and Héloïse: To Teach and Punish
2.4 Île de la Cité, West Side: Political Power
2.5 Pissing the Parisians Off: François Rabelais,
Gargantua, 1534
24
24
29
32
32
32
34
36
43
47
47
48
52
56
58
62
64
71
76
80
85
Contents |
3
4
Renaissance Paris: Wars of Religion and the Louvre
3.1 Learning from Antiquity
3.1.1 Perfected Beauty: Leone Battista Alberti,
Ten Books on Architecture, 1452
3.1.2 The Human Body, Model of Proportion:
Leonardo da Vinci, The Vitruvian Man, 1487
3.2 Renaissance Architecture: The Louvre, 13–20C
3.2.1 Medieval Louvre: From Fortress to Castle, 13–14C
3.2.2 From Medieval Castle to Renaissance Palace
3.2.3 Henri IV and His Grand Dessein for the Louvre
3.2.4 Louvre Outline, 13–20C
3.3 Renaissance Literature: The Pléiade Poets
3.3.1 Pierre de Ronsard, “Ode to Cassandre,” 1552
3.3.2 Portrait of Ronsard and Cassandre, 1552
3.3.3 Pierre de Ronsard, “On the Death of Marie,” 1578
3.4 Wars of Religion: The Saint-Bartholomew Massacre,
August 24, 1572
3.4.1 Margot’s Dissolution: Patrice Chéreau,
Queen Margot, 1994
3.4.2 Architectural, Political and Anatomical
Fragmentation: François Dubois,
The Saint-Bartholomew Massacre, 1575–84
3.4.3 Protestant and Catholic Reversible Bodies:
Agrippa d’Aubigné, Les Tragiques, 1577–1616
3.5 Henri IV and the Freedom of Conscience
3.5.1 Le Bon Roi Henri
3.5.2 Henri IV’s Program for a Renaissance Paris
Classical Paris: Louis XIV and Versailles
4.1 The Cogito in Perspective
4.1.1 Clouds in Brunelleschi’s Experiment:
Antonio Manetti, The Life of Brunelleschi, 1480
4.1.2 Rationalism and Subjectivity: René Descartes,
Discourse on Method, 1637
4.2 Louis XIV and Absolutism
4.2.1 Constructing the Image of a King: Roberto
Rossellini, The Taking of Power by Louis XIV, 1966
4.2.2 Louis XIV as the Sun King: Louis XIV,
Memoirs for the Instruction of the Dauphin, 1662
vii
89
94
94
99
103
103
105
109
110
113
113
117
118
120
121
122
125
127
127
132
137
141
141
145
148
148
150
viii
| Paris in Architecture, Literature, and Art
4.2.3
5
The King’s Two Bodies: Hyacinthe Rigaud,
Louis XIV in Coronation Dress, 1701
4.3 Louis XIV in Paris
4.3.1 Perrault’s Colonnade, Model of French Classicism
4.3.2 Unstable Center: Jules Hardouin-Mansart,
Place Vendôme, 1699
4.3.3 For His Veteran Soldiers: Libéral Bruant, Les
Invalides, 1671–91, and Jules Hardouin Mansart,
Dôme, 1708
4.3.4 Gossiping as a Form of Knowledge: Madame
de Sévigné, Letters, July 17, 1676
4.4 Perspective on Versailles
4.4.1 Enveloping a Hunting Castle: Louis Le Vau,
Versailles, 1661–78
4.4.2 Rationalist Baroque Lanscaping: André Le Nôtre,
Versailles Gardens, 1661–70
4.4.3 Lavish Baroque Palace within: Jules HardouinMansart, Expansion of Versailles, 1678–1715
4.4.4 The Disastrous Addition of Prestigious
Hall of Mirrors
4.4.5 The Crumbling Image of an Aging King:
Jean de La Bruyère, The Characters, 1688–96
Romantic Paris: Napoléon and the Arc de Triomphe
5.1 The Empire of Napoléon I
5.1.1 Napoléon and Joséphine: Abel Gance,
Napoléon, 1927
5.1.2 Napoléon and His Siblings
5.1.3 Legitimizing a French Emperor: Jacques-Louis
David, The Coronation of Napoléon, 1805–08
5.1.4 Napoléon’s Cruciform Perspective: Anthony
Sutcliffe, Paris, an Architectural History, 1993
5.2 The Exalted and Melancholy Romantic Soul:
Madame de Staël, Of Literature, 1800
5.3 Romantic Art: The Call to Freedom. Eugène Delacroix,
Liberty Leading the People, 1830
5.4 Romantic Architecture: Ambition of Glory
5.4.1 For the Grande Armée: Jean-Arnaud Raymond
and Jean-François Chalgrin, Arc de Triomphe,
1806–36
152
152
154
155
158
160
161
161
164
168
172
175
179
181
181
182
185
187
194
195
197
197
Contents |
5.4.2
5.4.3
6
7
Aux Armes: François Rude, The Marseillaise, 1836
The Anti-Hero: Eric Rohmer, “Place de l’Étoile”
in Six à Paris, 1965
5.5 Romantic Literature: Gavroche Jumping Over Walls.
Victor Hugo, Les Misérables, 1862
Realism in Haussmann’s Paris
6.1 The Second Empire
6.1.1 Napoléon III and Efficacious Baron Haussmann
6.1.2 Implementing an Emperor’s Vision:
Baron Haussmann, Mémoires, 1890
6.2 Realism in Literature: A Misery without Poetry.
Honoré de Balzac, Old Goriot, 1834
6.3 Realism in Art: Turning One’s Back on a Nude.
Gustave Courbet, The Painter’s Studio, 1855
6.4 Eclectic and Rationalist Architecture during the
Second Empire
6.4.1 For a Truthful Architecture: Eugène-Emmanuel
Viollet-le-Duc, Dictionnaire raisonné, 1854
6.4.2 A Frankly Revealed Structure: Henri Labrouste,
the Bibliothèque Nationale, 1862–68
6.4.3 Eclectic Architecture: Charles Garnier,
the Opéra Garnier, 1861–74
6.5 Paris under Construction
6.5.1 Haussmann’s Ruthless Restructuration of Paris
6.5.2 The Naturalist School: Paris Under Attack.
Emile Zola, The Kill, 1872
6.5.3 Paris as a Recumbent Bourgeoise:
Edmond Morin, The City of Paris Invaded by
Demolition Workers, 19C
6.5.4 Artificial, yet Charming, Bois de Boulogne
Impressionism and the Tour Eiffel
7.1 Impressionism in Art: Modern Life in the Plein Air
7.1.1 The Dismissed Message: Edouard Manet,
The Luncheon on the Grass, 1863
7.1.2 Incognito Flâneur at the Gare Saint-Lazare:
Gustave Caillebotte, On the Pont de l’Europe,
1880
7.1.3 Shapeless Strokes and Extreme Perspective:
Claude Monet, Impression, Sunrise, 1874
ix
198
200
200
223
225
225
226
230
237
238
238
242
246
249
249
254
257
257
263
267
267
268
274
x
| Paris in Architecture, Literature, and Art
7.1.4
8
In the Deluge of the Plein Air:
Stéphane Mallarmé, “The Impressionists and
Edouard Manet,” 1876
7.2 Impressionist Literature: The Beholder’s Individual
Impression
7.2.1 Literary Tableaux: Emile Zola,
The Human Beast, 1890
7.2.2 Machine-Produced Clouds: Jean Renoir,
La Bête humaine, 1938
7.3 Universal Expositions
7.3.1 The Committee of the Three Hundred:
Norma Evenson, Paris: A Century of Change,
1878–1978, 1979
7.3.2 Promenade along the Seine: Universal Expositions
7.3.3 Art Nouveau’s Dragonflies and Lilies:
Hector Guimard, Metro Stations Entrances, 1900
7.4 Impressionist Architecture: The Ultimate
Plein Air Building
7.4.1 Elusive and Scandalous Tour Eiffel:
Roland Barthes, The Eiffel Tower and
Other Mythologies, 1957
7.4.2 A Bridge to the Sky: Georges Seurat,
The Eiffel Tower, 1889
Cubism and Modern Architecture in Paris
8.1 Cubism in Art: Incorporating Time
8.1.1 An Art of Conception: Guillaume Apollinaire,
“Modern Painting,” 1913
8.1.2 Unfolding Geometric Surfaces and Shifting
Perspectives: Pablo Picasso, Portrait of
AmbroiseVollard, 1910, and Violin, 1914
8.1.3 Clouds Descending on the City:
Robert Delaunay, The City of Paris, 1912
8.2 Cubism in Literature: Disregarding Boundaries
8.2.1 Guillaume Apollinaire, Windows, 1912
8.2.2 Guillaume Apollinaire, Calligram of the
Tour Eiffel, 1918
278
283
283
286
287
288
291
292
294
294
296
299
303
303
304
307
310
310
312
Contents |
8.3
9
Modern Architecture: From Masonry Wall to
Reinforced Concrete Frame
8.3.1 Exposing Concrete: Auguste Perret,
Apartments at 25b, Rue Franklin, 1904
8.3.2 The Power to Move: Le Corbusier,
Towards a New Architecture, 1927
8.3.3 Free Plan and Free Facade: Le Corbusier,
“The Five Points of a New Architecture,” 1926
8.3.4 Cubist Man in Movement: Le Corbusier,
The Modulor, 1938–48
8.3.5 Architectural Promenade: Le Corbusier,
Villas La Roche-Jeanneret, 1923–25
8.4 Cubist Architecture: Le Corbusier, The Villa Savoye,
1928–31
Beaubourg and Postmodern Paris
9.1 What Is Postmodernism? Jean-François Lyotard,
The Postmodern Condition, 1979
9.2 Sixties and Seventies: Disillusion with Modernism
9.2.1 Reaffirming France’s Prestige: Charles de Gaulle,
Complete War Memoirs, 1940–1946, 1954
9.2.2 Against a Manhattanization of Paris:
Louis Chevalier, The Assassination of Paris, 1977
9.2.3 The Tired Hero of Modern Life: Jean Rouch,
“Gare du Nord,” in Six à Paris, 1965
9.2.4 Surrealist Siren of the Seine: André Breton,
“Pont Neuf,” 1950
9.2.5 Nostalgia for a Pre-modern Paris: Woody Allen,
Midnight in Paris, 2011
9.3 Postmodern Paris: The Beaubourg Provocation
9.3.1 Architecture as a Language: Charles Jencks,
The Language of Post-Modern Architecture, 1977
9.3.2 Postmodernism in Beaubourg: Renzo Piano and
Richard Rogers, Beaubourg/Pompidou Center,
1977
9.3.3 Beaubourg the Cyborg: Sergio Birga,
Main Basse sur la ville, 1976
xi
313
313
316
318
321
322
327
337
341
345
345
347
350
351
355
357
357
360
365
xii
| Paris in Architecture, Literature, and Art
9.3.4
10
Beaubourg the Extra-terrestrial: Georges Pérec,
“Tout autour de Beaubourg,” 1981
Grands Travaux and Beyond
10.1 The Mitterrand Years: Reviving the
Monarch-Builder Tradition
10.2 Grands Travaux on the Axe historique:
Neomodern Monumentality
10.2.1 Cube and Clouds: Johan Otto von Spreckelsen,
Grande Arche de la Défense, 1989
10.2.2 The Grande Arche Paradigm:
Seloua Luste Boulbina, Grands Travaux à Paris:
1981–1995, 2007
10.2.3 From Palace to Museum: The Grand Louvre, 1989
10.2.4 A Sovereign Act: Jack Lang, Dictionnaire
amoureux de François Mitterrand, 2015
10.2.5 An Archaic Novelty: Ieoh Ming Pei,
Pyramide du Louvre, 1989
10.3 Grands Travaux at the East: Spreading Culture
10.3.1 A Monument for Paris Rive Gauche:
Dominique Perrault, Bibliothèque Nationale
de France, 1997
10.3.2 Transparency in Question: Anthony Vidler,
The Architectural Uncanny, 1999
10.3.3 Promenade: The Bercy Quarter
10.4 On the Margin
10.4.1 Underprivileged Banlieue
10.4.2 Inhospitable Périphérique: Parc de la Villette,
1986–2015
10.4.3 Angry with No Job and a Gun:
Mathieu Kassovitz, Hate, 1995
10.4.4 For a Beurette Literature: Faïza Guène,
Kiffe Kiffe Tomorrow, 2004
Illustration Credits
367
369
373
377
377
379
382
384
386
387
387
390
392
393
393
395
401
403
407
Illustrations
Chapter 1: Walls of Paris
Fig. 1.1.
Fig. 1.2.
Fig. 1.3.
Fig. 1.4.
Fig. 1.5.
Fig. 1.6.
Fig. 1.7.
Fig. 1.8.
Fig. 1.9.
Fig. 1.10.
Fig. 1.11.
Fig. 1.12.
Fig. 1.13.
Fig. 1.14.
Gallo-Roman Lutetia, 2–4C
Goscinny and Uderzo, Lutetia in La Serpe d’or, 1962
Goscinny and Uderzo, Lutetia in Les Lauriers de
César, 1972
Moine Yves, The Conversion of Lisbius, in Life of SaintDenis, 1317
Baptism of Clovis, in Grandes Chroniques de France, 1380
De la Mare, Lutèce conquise par les François, 1705
Braun, View of Paris in 1530, 1572
Fouquet, John the Good Entering the Capital in 1350, 1460
Fouquet, Charles V Entering the Capital in 1364, 1460
Merian, Le Plan de la ville, 1615
Moithey, Plan des enceintes de Paris, 1787
APUR, Enquête sur les tissus urbains, 2001
Concentric Boulevards on the former city walls
New Loops bypassing Paris: Super-Périphérique and
Francilienne
8
12
12
15
21
23
26
27
28
33
35
38
40
42
xiv
| Paris in Architecture, Literature, and Art
Chapter 2: Gothic Paris: Notre-Dame and
the Île de la Cité
Fig. 2.1.
Fig. 2.2.
Fig. 2.3.
Fig. 2.4.
Fig. 2.5.
Fig. 2.6.
Fig. 2.7.
Fig. 2.8.
Fig. 2.9.
Fig. 2.10.
Fig. 2.11.
Fig. 2.12.
Fig. 2.13.
Fig. 2.14.
Fig. 2.15.
Fig. 2.16.
Fig. 2.17.
Fig. 2.18.
Fig. 2.19.
Fig. 2.20.
Fig. 2.21.
Fig. 2.22.
Fig. 2.23.
Fig. 2.24.
Fig. 2.25.
Fig. 2.26.
Fig. 2.27.
Saint-Julien-le-Pauvre, 1170
Hôtel de Cluny, 1485–98
Thermes de Cluny, 3C, and Hôtel de Cluny, 1485–98: plan
Tour Saint-Jacques, 1523
Suger’s partial transformation of the Carolingian Saint-Denis
Basilica, 1135–44
Suger, Saint-Denis Basilica: doors at the west
Suger, Saint-Denis Basilica: ribbed vaults in double ambulatory
Suger, Saint-Denis Basilica: nave and stained-glass windows
Suger, Saint-Denis Basilica: Paul unveils Moses’ law
Notre-Dame: section through the nave
Romanesque and Gothic vaulting systems
Île de la Cité, 14C
Fouquet, Right Hand of God Driving Out Demons,
in Hours of Étienne Chevalier, 1452–60
Notre-Dame, west facade, 1200–50
Saint-Germain-des-Prés, 990–1014, and Notre-Dame,
1163–1245
Notre-Dame: central portal of the Last Judgment,
west facade, 1225
Notre-Dame central portal, embrasure: vices and virtues
Notre-Dame central portal, trumeau: teaching Jesus
Notre-Dame central portal, archivolt to the left:
Heaven with the three patriarchs
Notre-Dame central portal, archivolt to the right: Hell
Notre-Dame central portal, apex of tympanum: Christ in glory
Notre-Dame central portal, middle lintel of tympanum: the trial
Notre-Dame central portal, lower lintel of tympanum:
call to judgment
Detail of the trial: Notre-Dame Woman in the scale
Saint-Michel, Lacroix, Voillat, The Golden Moments of
Notre-Dame de Paris, 2006
Notre-Dame west rose window, outside view
Notre-Dame west rose window, inside view
45
45
45
45
50
51
51
51
51
55
55
57
59
61
63
66
68
68
68
68
70
70
70
71
73
74
75
Illustrations |
Fig. 2.28. Abélard and Héloïse, illumination from a 14C
manuscript of Le Roman de la Rose
Fig. 2.29. Sainte-Chapelle, 1248: lower and upper chapel plans
Fig. 2.30. Sainte-Chapelle: outside view
Fig. 2.31. Sainte Chapelle: inside view
Fig. 2.32. Philippe le Bel, plan of Palais de la Cité, 1313
Fig. 2.33. Conciergerie today
Fig. 2.34. Limbourg Brothers, Month of June, in The Very Rich
Hours of the Duke of Berry, ca. 1440
xv
79
82
82
82
84
84
86
Chapter 3: Renaissance Paris: Wars of Religion
and the Louvre
Fig. 3.1.
Fig. 3.2.
Fig. 3.3.
Fig. 3.4.
Fig. 3.5.
Fig. 3.6.
Fig. 3.7.
Fig. 3.8.
Fig. 3.9.
Fig. 3.10.
Fig. 3.11.
Fig. 3.12.
Fig. 3.13.
Fig. 3.14.
Fig. 3.15.
Fig. 3.16.
Fig. 3.17.
Fig. 3.18.
Fig. 3.19.
Fig. 3.20.
Fig. 3.21.
Fig. 3.22.
Boccador, Hôtel de Ville, 1533, additions 1835, rebuilt 1892
Saint-Eustache Church, 1540
Du Cerceau, Hôtel de Sully, 1625–29
De Brosse, Palais du Luxembourg, 1615–30
Lemercier, Palais-Royal, 1639
The Three Orders of Architecture
Da Vinci, The Vitruvian Man, ca. 1490
Louvre Fortress of Philippe Auguste, 1190–1202
Louvre Castle of Charles V, 1380
Lescot, southwest wing of the Cour Carrée, 1546–51
Lescot, southwest wing of the Cour Carrée, 1546–51
Lescot and Goujon, Fontaine des Innocents, 1550
Lescot and Goujon, detail of the Fontaine des Innocents
The Louvre under Henri IV
Plan of 21C Louvre
Mellan, Ronsard and Cassandra Salviati, 1552
Dubois, The Saint-Bartholomew Massacre, 1575–84
Place des Vosges, 1612: King Pavilion
Place des Vosges, 1612: houses of four bays each
Place des Vosges, 1612: steep roof with black slates
Pont Neuf and round refuges, 1607
Place Dauphine: careless renovation of original 1607 houses
92
92
92
92
92
99
102
104
105
106
108
108
108
110
112
117
123
133
135
135
135
135
xvi
| Paris in Architecture, Literature, and Art
Chapter 4: Classical Paris: Louis XIV and Versailles
Fig. 4.1.
Fig. 4.2.
Fig. 4.3.
Fig. 4.4.
Fig. 4.5.
Fig. 4.6.
Fig. 4.7.
Fig. 4.8.
Fig. 4.9.
Fig. 4.10.
Fig. 4.11.
Fig. 4.12.
Fig. 4.13.
Fig. 4.14.
Fig. 4.15.
Fig. 4.16.
Fig. 4.17.
Fig. 4.18.
Fig. 4.19.
Fig. 4.20.
Fig. 4.21.
Fig. 4.22.
Fig. 4.23.
Blondel, Porte Saint-Denis, 1674
Hardouin-Mansart, Place des Victoires, 1685
Soufflot, Panthéon, 1757–90
Ledoux, Parc Monceau Tollhouse, 1785–91
Brunelleschi’s perspective experiment, 1415
Adaptation of Da Vinci’s The Last Supper, 1498:
one-point perspective
Rigaud, Louis XIV in Coronation Dress, 1701
Perrault, Colonnade du Louvre, east facade, 1670
Hardouin-Mansart, octagonal Place Vendôme, 1699
Hardouin-Mansart, tripartite facade on the
Place Vendôme, 1699
Axonometric view of the Invalides by Bruant, 1671–91,
with Hardouin-Mansart’s dome behind, 1708
Le Vau, Versailles addition of 1662
Le Vau, Versailles envelope, 1669
Palais de Versailles: Marble courtyard
Palais de Versailles: Apollo Fountain
Palais de Versailles: Le Nôtre classical garden
Le Nôtre, Versailles Gardens, 1705: plan
Hardouin-Mansart, Versailles, addition of the Hall of
Mirrors, 1680
Palais de Versailles: balustrade in the king’s bedroom
Palais de Versailles: Queen Staircase trompe-l’œil panel
Palais de Versailles: Salon of Plenty
Palais de Versailles: Hall of Mirrors
Hardouin-Mansart, addition of the Hall of Mirrors, 1687
140
140
140
140
143
143
153
154
157
157
159
163
163
165
165
165
167
169
173
173
173
173
175
Chapter 5: Romantic Paris: Napoleon and
the Arc de Triomphe
Fig. 5.1.
Fig. 5.2.
Fig. 5.3.
Fig. 5.4.
David, The Coronation of Napoleon, 1805–08
186
Map of Paris: Napoléon’s Cruciform Perspective
189
Place de la Concorde: Hôtel de la Marine, 1775, and Obélisque 189
Percier and Fontaine, Arc du Carrousel, 1806
190
Illustrations |
Fig. 5.5.
Fig. 5.6.
Fig. 5.7.
Fig. 5.8.
Fig. 5.9.
Raymond and Chalgrin, Arc de Triomphe, 1806–36
Vignon, La Madeleine, 1806–42
Poyet, Assemblée Nationale, 1807
Delacroix, Liberty Leading the People, 1830
Rude, La Marseillaise, 1836
xvii
190
190
190
196
199
Chapter 6: Realism in Haussmann’s Paris
Fig. 6.1.
Fig. 6.2.
Courbet, The Painter’s Studio, 1855
Labrouste, Bibliothèque Nationale, 1868, plan of the
reading room
Fig. 6.3. Labrouste, Bibliothèque Nationale, inside view of the
reading room
Fig. 6.4. Baltard, Les Halles, 1852–66
Fig. 6.5. Garnier, Opéra, 1861–74: plan
Fig. 6.6. Garnier, Opéra, 1861–74: facade
Fig. 6.7. Diagram of Haussmann’s networks of roads and plazas
Fig. 6.8. Hittorff, Place de l’Étoile in the shape of a star
Fig. 6.9. Map of the administrative limits of Paris after 1859,
with Haussmann’s division into twenty arrondissements
Fig. 6.10. Morin, The City of Paris Invaded by Demolition Workers, 19C
Fig. 6.11. Alphand, Bois de Boulogne, 1852–58
239
244
244
245
247
248
252
252
253
258
260
Chapter 7: Impressionism and the Tour Eiffel
Fig. 7.1
Fig. 7.2
Fig. 7.3.
Fig. 7.4.
Fig. 7.5.
Abadie, Sacré-Cœur, 1875–1919: facade
Abadie, Sacré-Cœur: plan
Eiffel, Tour Eiffel, 1889
Résal and Alby, Pont Alexandre III, 1900
Deglane, Louvet and Thomas, Grand Palais,
and Girault, Petit Palais, 1900
Fig. 7.6. Manet, The Luncheon on the Grass, 1863
Fig. 7.7. Manet, The Railway, 1872
Fig. 7.8. View of the Gare Saint-Lazare and Pont de l’Europe in 1868
Fig. 7.9. Caillebotte, On the Pont de l’Europe, 1876–80
Fig. 7.10. Monet, Impression, Sunrise, 1874
265
265
265
265
265
269
269
271
273
273
xviii
| Paris in Architecture, Literature, and Art
Fig. 7.11. Caillebotte, Paris Street, Rainy Day, 1877
Fig. 7.12. Monet, Interior View of the Gare Saint-Lazare:
The Auteuil Line, 1877
Fig. 7.13. Guimard, Châtelet Pavilion, 1900
Fig. 7.14. Guimard, Porte Dauphine Pavilion, 1900
Fig. 7.15. Guimard, Louvre metro entrance, 1900
Fig. 7.16. Guimard, Saint-Michel metro entrance, 1900
Fig. 7.17. Seurat, The Eiffel Tower, 1889
277
282
293
293
293
293
297
Chapter 8: Cubism and Modern
Architecture in Paris
Fig. 8.1.
Fig. 8.2.
Fig. 8.3.
Fig. 8.4.
Fig. 8.5.
Fig. 8.6.
Fig. 8.7.
Fig. 8.8.
Fig. 8.9.
Fig. 8.10.
Fig. 8.11.
Fig. 8.12.
Fig. 8.13.
Fig. 8.14.
Fig. 8.15.
Fig. 8.16.
Fig. 8.17.
Fig. 8.18.
Fig. 8.19.
Fig. 8.20.
Fig. 8.21.
Fig. 8.22.
Fig. 8.23.
Fig. 8.24.
Sauvage, Rue des Amiraux, 1922: section through pool
Mallet-Stevens, Villa Martel on Rue Mallet-Stevens, 1927
Boileau, Carlu and Azéma, Palais de Chaillot, 1937
Picasso, Portrait of Ambroise Vollard, 1910
Picasso, Violin, 1913–14
Rousseau, Myself, Portrait-paysage, 1890
Delaunay, The City of Paris, 1912
Apollinaire, Calligram of the Tour Eiffel, 1918
Perret, Apartments at 25b, Rue Franklin, 1904: facade
Perret, 25b, Rue Franklin, 1904: plan
Perret, structural plan of the Apartments at 25b,
Rue Franklin, 1904
Le Corbusier, Dom-Ino prototype, 1922
Le Corbusier, Villa Savoye, 1928–31
Adaptation of a drawing of Le Corbusier’s The Modulor, 1948
Adaptation of a drawing of Le Corbusier’s The Modulor, 1946
Le Corbusier, Villas La Roche-Jeanneret, 1923–25: plan
Le Corbusier, Villas La Roche-Jeanneret: no clear entrance
Le Corbusier, Villa La Roche: art gallery curved wall
Le Corbusier, Villa La Roche: great hall on three levels
Le Corbusier, Villa La Roche: art gallery and ramp
Le Corbusier, Villa Savoye, 1928–31: axonometric view
Le Corbusier, Villa Savoye: ground floor plan
Le Corbusier, Villa Savoye: roof solarium plan
Le Corbusier, Villa Savoye: main floor plan
301
301
301
306
307
309
309
313
315
315
316
320
320
322
322
324
325
325
325
325
328
330
330
330
Illustrations |
Fig. 8.25. Le Corbusier, Villa Savoye: a box on pilotis
Fig. 8.26. Le Corbusier, Villa Savoye: helicoidal stairs on ground floor
Fig. 8.27. Le Corbusier, Villa Savoye: curved wall, pilotis and
entrance at back
Fig. 8.28. Le Corbusier, Villa Savoye: ramp and stairs inside
Fig. 8.29. Le Corbusier, Villa Savoye: ramp and stairs outside
Fig. 8.30. Le Corbusier, Villa Savoye: “I compose with light”
Fig. 8.31. Le Corbusier, Villa Savoye: master bedroom master bath
xix
332
332
332
333
333
333
333
Chapter 9: Beaubourg and Postmodern Paris
Fig. 9.1.
Fig. 9.2.
Fig. 9.3.
Fig. 9.4.
Mailly, Zehrfuss and Prouvé, Cnit, la Défense, 1958
Italie 13, Les Olympiades, 1960s
Bernard, Maison de l’ORTF, 1963
Baudoin, Cassan, Hoym de Marien and Saubot,
Tour Montparnasse, 1973
Fig. 9.5. The Manhattanization of Paris: Front de Seine, 1970s
Fig. 9.6. Pencreac’h and Vasconi, Forum des Halles, 1979
Fig. 9.7. Piano and Rogers, Beaubourg: west facade, escalator
and plaza
Fig. 9.8. Piano and Rogers, Beaubourg: 48 m long trusses
and gerberettes
Fig. 9.9. Piano and Rogers, Beaubourg: east facade, blue cooling pipes
Fig. 9.10. Piano and Rogers, Beaubourg: east facade, yellow electrical
conduits and red lifts
Fig. 9.11. Birga, Main basse sur la ville, 1976
340
340
340
340
350
361
363
363
363
363
366
Chapter 10: Grands Travaux and Beyond
Fig. 10.1.
Fig. 10.2.
Fig. 10.3.
Fig. 10.4.
Fig. 10.5.
Fig. 10.6.
Nouvel, Musée du quai Branly, 2006
Jakob and MacFarlane, Cité de la mode, 2010
Gehry, Fondation Louis Vuitton, 2014
Berger and Anziutti, La Canopée, 2016
Aulenti, Musée d’Orsay, 1986
Nouvel, Lezenes, Soria and Architecture Studio,
Institut du Monde Arabe (IMA), 1987
371
371
371
371
377
377
xx
| Paris in Architecture, Literature, and Art
Fig. 10.7. Chemetov and Huidobro, Ministère de l’Économie et
des Finances, 1988
Fig. 10.8. Ott, Opéra Bastille, 1989
Fig. 10.9. Spreckelsen, Grande Arche, 1989: open cube
Fig. 10.10. Spreckelsen, Grande Arche: insect-like people
Fig. 10.11. Spreckelsen, Grande Arche: Axe historique
Fig. 10.12. Spreckelsen, Grande Arche: hovering clouds
Fig. 10.13. Axonometric view of the Grand Louvre with the
Pyramide by Ieoh Ming Pei, 1989
Fig. 10.14. Pei, Pyramide du Louvre: fragmentation of the old Louvre
Fig. 10.15. Pei, Pyramide du Louvre: moving reflections
Fig. 10.16. Pei, Pyramide du Louvre: running clouds
Fig. 10.17. Pei, Pyramide du Louvre: a heart of glass
Fig. 10.18. Perrault, Bibliothèque Nationale de France, 1997
Fig. 10.19. Map of annual median income in Paris and the banlieue
Fig. 10.20. Map of Parc de la Villette in the 19th arrondissement,
1986–2015
Fig. 10.21. Parc de la Villette: Fainsilber, Cité des sciences et de
l’industrie, 1986
Fig. 10.22. Parc de la Villette: Tschumi, Prairie du Triangle 1991
Fig. 10.23. Parc de la Villette: Tschumi, Folie Café “Goûtu,” 1991
Fig. 10.24. Parc de la Villette: Nouvel, Philharmonie de Paris, 2015
377
377
380
380
380
380
383
388
388
388
388
390
395
397
400
400
400
400
2
Gothic Paris
Notre-Dame and the Île de la Cité
11–12C Hugues Capet assigns Abbot Morard to rebuild Saint-Germaindes-Prés (1014, fig. 2.15), one of the few Romanesque churches in
Paris Napoléon did not tear down. Saint-Julien-le-Pauvre Church
(1170, fig. 2.1), also in the Romanesque style and with its square
facing Notre-Dame, is the best place to picnic in the shadow of the
oldest tree in Paris, a locust tree that crossed the ocean in a basket
from young America in 1602.
1132
Pierre Abélard, one of the greatest 12C intellectuals, writes Historia Calamitatum (1132), where he describes his love story with sixteen-year-old Héloïse, and his subsequent castration by her uncle
Fulbert, canon of Notre-Dame Cathedral.
1144
Abbot Suger rebuilds the Basilica of Saint-Denis, creates the
Gothic style, and writes On What Was Done under his Administration (1148, figs. 2.5–9).
12–13C Maurice de Sully, Bishop of Paris, starts the construction of Gothic
Notre-Dame (1163–1245, figs. 2.10, 2.13–27).
12–13C Philippe Auguste (1180–1223) defeats his coalesced enemies in
Bouvine in 1214, creates a permanent royal army, reorganizes the
finances and the judiciary system, and founds the university of
44
| Paris in Architecture, Literature, and Art
Paris in 1200. He builds the first wall of Paris, the Louvre Fortress (1190–1202, fig. 3.8), and continues the construction of
Notre-Dame.
13C
Louis IX (1226–70), grandson of Philippe Auguste and canonized as Saint-Louis after his death, buys the Christ relics from the
Emperor of Constantinople and gives them a sanctuary in the
Sainte-Chapelle (1241–48, figs. 2.29–31).
14C
Philippe le Bel (1285–1314), grandson of Saint-Louis, rebuilds the
Conciergerie (1313, figs. 2.32–33), the palace of the kings with
four towers and now the home of the judicial center of France.
14–15C The Black Plague (1348) and the one hundred years war (1337–
1453) bring the Paris population down to 100,000 inhabitants in
1450.
14C
During the regency and reign of Charles V (1364–80), called the
Wise, Paris knows twenty years of wealth and security. Charles V
enlarges the wall of Paris to the north to enclose the Louvre and
small isolated cities. He also transforms the Louvre into a royal
residence and builds the Bastille at the east.
15C
Joan of Arc is burnt in Rouen May 10, 1431. The reign of Louis
XI (1461–83) marks the end of the Middle Ages.
15–16C Among other constructions at the end of the Gothic period, the
Hôtel de Cluny (1485–98, fig. 2.3) leans against the remnants
of the Gallo-Roman Thermes de Cluny (chapter 1), using the
frigidarium as a barn. Originally a town house for the abbots of
Cluny and now a medieval museum (with the famous “La Dame
à la Licorne” tapestries), it features a service courtyard at the
front of a main wing, with flamboyant decorations in its ogival
arches, balustrade, gargoyles, semi-embedded octagonal tower
and dormers. The 52 m high Tour Saint-Jacques (1509–23, fig.
2.4) with its heavily decorated upper parts is a late example of
flamboyant style before the Renaissance asserts itself. The tower
is all that remains of the Saint-Jacques-la-Boucherie church
demolished during the French Revolution, which Haussmann
isolated to mark his Grande Croisée (see chapter 6). It stands
skinny and clumsy as if on the verge of falling, orphaned from its
mother church and adrift as an arcane and delightful dream of
conquering the sky.
Gothic Paris |
Fig. 2.1. Saint-Julien-le-Pauvre, 1170.
Fig. 2.3. Thermes de Cluny, 3C, and Hôtel de
Cluny, 1485–98: plan.
45
Fig. 2.2. Hôtel de Cluny,
1485–98.
Fig. 2.4. Tour Saint-Jacques,
1523.
By the year 1000 Barbarian Invasions cease, along with their pillaging, killing
and burning. Improvement in all aspects of life can be achieved and in architecture Romanesque Abbeys flourish, providing places of meditation within the
protective darkness of their thick walls to a mostly itinerant society. In time, rural
prosperity brings a movement of urbanization, with the church taking the central
place in a city surrounded by walls.
46
| Paris in Architecture, Literature, and Art
The Saint-Denis Basilica at the north of Paris is the most opulent: started on
the burial grounds of Saint Denis by Sainte Geneviève, it becomes the burial place
for the kings of France, beginning with Dagobert, and is lavished with generous
royal gifts. In 1144, Abbot Suger revolutionizes architecture by transforming the
basilica into the very first Gothic structure. In Suger’s theology, light serves as
a vehicle of spiritual ascension from material to immaterial, which he embodies in the openness and accentuated verticality inside his church. Suger’s masons
replace the massive Romanesque walls with a lighter structure of piers, ribbed
vaulting and pointed arches, and as a result large windows can be opened in the
non-structural parts of walls, allowing light to pervade the building through their
magnificent painted glass. Stained-glass windows act like a filter, hiding outside
reality while letting light pass through, making the experience of the divine more
palpable and immediate.
Notre-Dame embodies a perfected mastering of Suger’s Gothic verticality,
with the flexible pointed arch bringing a unified plan in the image of God as one,
and its facade displaying a harmonious tension in its tripartite horizontal and
vertical composition, as a way of relating mortal existence to divine creation. In
the sculpture of Last Judgment Portal, Archangel Saint Michel weighs the souls
of two small people just emerged from the dead. One of them will soon join the
damned souls on their way to Hell where he will fuse with monsters in a mass
of deformed and rotting flesh. On the other side of the balance, a small woman
kneels into an intercessory prayer directed to Christ in the Apex of the tympanum, who holds his hands up and shows that even resurrected he can still hurt
along with us from his wounds.
Literary works reflects the same vertical axis emphasizing the need for a mediated communication between Earth and Heaven. In his Historia Calamitatum,
Pierre Abélard presents himself as a sinful lover who abused the younger Héloïse
and asks her to take the role of mediator and intercede for him to the divine world
through her prayers. The Very Rich Hours of the Duke of Berry (Pol de Limbourg,
1415) presents the western side of the Île de la Cité with the Gothic Conciergerie
and its Sainte-Chapelle. While Gothic cathedrals use stones at their upmost, the
Sainte-Chapelle appears to be built in spite of stones. The windows take up most of
the wall space, and the experience of verticality and light is brought to its apogee.
Finally, Rabelais’s Gargantua shows the passage from a Gothic to a Renaissance humanist conception of the world that favors individual thinking over religious indoctrination. Standing at the top of the Notre-Dame towers, Gargantua
punishes the Parisians’ lack of enlightenment by urinating and drowning them in
a flow as powerful as the Seine.
Gothic Paris |
47
2.1 The Gothic Experience of Light
2.1.1 What Is an Esthetic Experience?
For architects such as Alberti (chapter 3) and Le Corbusier (chapter 8), beauty in a
building is based on its emotive capability—we think a building beautiful when it
has the power to move us. While modern man can often narrow the scope of his life
to a visible “reality,” Middle Ages man has such a precarious life he cannot ignore the
immaterial world beyond. The question for him centers on how to make the invisible
visible, and Abbot Suger brings an answer. For him, God is light, and architecture is
the medium to make His presence palpable on earth. Suger describes his experience
of light and architecture in terms that may not be familiar to us, but many of us had
“esthetic experiences” in which the role of light has been instrumental.
Kant, The Critique of Judgment, 1790
In his 1750 Aesthetica, German philosopher Alexander Baumgarten proposes
the esthetic value of a work of art can be determined by its ability to produce vivid experiences in its audience. In 1781, Immanuel Kant introduces
a third element: for judging something to be “beautiful,” sensation gives rise
to pleasure by engaging our capacities of reflective contemplation. In this
sense, which we use here, judgments of beauty are sensorial, emotional and
intellectual all at once.
Note: For Kant, the esthetic experience takes place with something not
given in nature and in comparison with which all else is small (for instance,
Asterix’s reaction when seeing Lutetia and exclaiming, “LUTÈCE! …”). Beauty
is not to be looked for in the things themselves, but in our own ideas about
them. Finally, esthetic judgments may give a reaction of awe, possibly embodied
in our physical reactions—which in turn may be constitutive of our judgment.
Interaction: Experiencing Light
In groups of two, reflect on times where you were touched by light. Share the
results with the class, writing answers on the board, and classifying them in the
following Kantian categories:
t Physical/sensorial (the experience is based on seeing a work of art—not
something given in nature. It can be light on a building, or sunset on a
skyline, etc.)
t Emotional (the experience produces a “vivid experience,” it “touches” us).
48
| Paris in Architecture, Literature, and Art
t Intellectual/spiritual (the experience engages a “reflective contemplation”
of an intellectual/spiritual nature).
2.1.2 The Anagogical Path to Light: Abbot Suger, On What Was
Done During His Administration, 1144–48
Abbot Suger bases his Theology of Light on the Theologia mystica written by Dionysius the Aeropagite, wrongly thought at the time to be Saint Denis himself.
Suger takes from his treaty the idea that God is absolute light, and created the
universe in a downward burst of luminosity flowing down into the universe. Each
creature receives the divine light, but also reflects it back to the invisible God from
which it all proceeds. In that sense, light serves as a vehicle of spiritual ascension
from material below to immaterial above.
Suger himself writes two treatises, On his Administration and On Consecration,
explaining the role played by light in esthetics and spirituality. In the excerpts
below, he guides the reader in a processional path through his Gothic church,
starting at the front door, through the nave and chancel, and up to the high altar,
as well as in an “anagogical” path from the material to the immaterial, expressing
the correspondence between the physical space of the church and its spiritual aim.
XXVII Of the Cast and Gilded Doors (48–49)
[…] The verses on the door, further, are these:
“Whoever thou art, if thou seekest to extol the glory of these doors,
Marvel not at the gold and the expense but at the craftsmanship of the work.
Bright is the noble work; but being nobly bright, the work
Should brighten the minds, so that they may travel, through the true lights,
To the True Light where Christ is the true door.
In what manner it be inherent in this world the golden door defines:
The dull mind rises to truth through that which is material
And, in seeing this light, is resurrected from its former submersion.”
XXVIII Of the Enlargement of the Upper Choir (51)
[…] To these verses of the inscription we choose the following ones to be added:
“Once the new rear part is joined to the part in front,
The church shines with its middle part brightened.
For bright is that which is brightly coupled with the bright,
And bright is the noble edifice which is pervaded by the new light;
Which stands enlarged in our time,
I, who was Suger, being the leader while it was being accomplished.”
XXXIV [On Stained-glass windows] (73–75)
Moreover, we caused to be painted, by the exquisite hands of many masters from different
regions, a splendid variety of new windows, both below and above; from that first one
Gothic Paris |
49
which begins [the series] with the Tree of Jesse in the chevet of the church to that which
is installed above the principal door in the church’s entrance. One of these, urging us
onward from the material to the immaterial, represents the Apostle Paul turning a mill,
and the Prophets carrying sacks to the mill. The accompanying verse says,
By working the mill, Paul, you take the flour from the bran.
You make known the inner meaning of Moses’ law.
From so many grains is made the true bread without bran,
The perpetual food of men and angels.
In the same window, where the veil is removed from Moses’ face, it says,
What Moses veils, the doctrine of Christ unveils.
Those who despoil Moses bare the Law.
XXXIII Concerning the Golden Cross (63–65)
[…] To those who know the properties of precious stones it becomes evident, to their
utter astonishment, that none is absent from the number of these (with the only exception of the carbuncle), but that they abound most copiously. Thus, when—out of my
delight in the beauty of the house of God—the loveliness of the many-colored gems has
called me away from external cares, and worthy meditation has induced me to reflect,
transferring that which is material to that which is immaterial, on the diversity of the
sacred virtues: then it seems to me that I see myself dwelling, as it were, in some strange
region of the universe which neither exists entirely in the slime of the earth nor entirely
in the purity of Heaven; and that, by the grace of God, I can be transported from this
inferior to that higher world in an anagogical manner.
Abbot Suger, On What was Done during his Administration, ed. and trans. Erwin
Panofsky (New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1946, 1979), 48–75. First written in 1144–48.
Observation: The Religious Experience of Beauty
XXVII Of the Cast and Gilded Doors
The renovation of the Saint-Denis basilica starts with the porch at the west,
which, like Notre-Dame, has three portals representing the Trinity. The central
portal depicts the Passion and Resurrection of the Christ, emphasizing the Christ
of the Gospels rather than the abstract God of the Old Testament (fig. 2.6). This
new vision of a humanized God is brought by Crusaders who have seen the actual
places of the New Testament, whether the Christ’s birthplace in Bethlehem, the
mount of Olives, or the sites of his crucifixion and entombment in Jerusalem.
Crusades also play a crucial role in Suger’s life, as Louis VII makes him regent
during his absence.
t What do “bright” and “light” each designate?
t Which aspect of the Trinity is emphasized when the Christ is said to be the
“true door”?
50
| Paris in Architecture, Literature, and Art
XXVIII Of the Enlargement of the Upper Choir
The “new rear part” is the part at the west of the Basilica, with the door described
above in XXVII. The “part in front” is the double ambulatory at the east side, which
has just been renovated to include large stained-glass windows (see figs. 2.5 and 2.7).
t What is the effect of the new light on the church?
t How does the “new light” differ from the “True Light” in XXVI?
Fig. 2.5. Abbot Suger’s partial transformation of the Carolingian Saint-Denis Basilica,
1135–44.
XXXIV [On Stained-glass windows]
The “splendid variety of new windows” are the stained-glass windows Suger uses in an
innovative way as they take the whole space in between the stone structure (fig. 2.8).
t How does Paul “unveil” Moses’ law (see also fig. 2.9)?
t How may stained-glass windows participate in this process of unveiling?
For example, how may they “sift” the outside reality away, and what do
they replace it with?
XXXIII Concerning the Golden Cross
The processional path ends at the Golden Cross located in the chancel of the new
church, and this is where Suger’s spiritual experience takes place.
t How is the “worthy meditation” induced?
t What do you make of the “strange region” Suger sees himself dwelling in?
t Describe Suger’s “anagogical” transportation, and the role light plays in it.
Gothic Paris |
51
Fig. 2.6. Doors at the west.
Fig. 2.7. Ribbed vaults in double ambulatory.
Fig. 2.8. Nave and stained-glass windows.
Fig. 2.9. Paul unveils Moses’ law.
Figs. 2.6–9. Abbot Suger, Saint-Denis Basilica, 1135–44.
52
| Paris in Architecture, Literature, and Art
2.1.3 Flexible Gothic Arch: Sir Banister Fletcher, A History of
Architecture on the Comparative Method, 1896
Fletcher’s text is by far the most technical of the textbook, yet still one of the best
to present the radically innovative Gothic architecture, with its structural skeleton
of piers, pointed arches, ribbed vaults and flying buttresses.
[1] The Gothic of the thirteenth century throughout Europe was slowly evolved from
Romanesque architecture and is mainly distinguished by the introduction and general
use of the pointed arch, whose original home was Mesopotamia; from Assyria (p. 86) it
passed to Sassanian Persia; when the Muslims conquered Persia (c. 641) it became part
of their stock-in-trade. The adventurous Normans found it well established when they
wrested Sicily from the Muslims (1061–90) and in Syria it was in frequent use at the
opening of the Crusades (1096). This feature, in conjunction with buttresses and lofty
pinnacles, gives to the style the aspiring tendency, which has been regarded as symbolic
of the religious aspirations of the period. Romanesque architects had begun to recognize
the differing functions performed by the respective parts of vaulted buildings and to
provide for them more economically than the Romans had done. Gothic architects further extended the application of the principles of counterpoise, and by employing small
stones laid in shallow courses with thick mortar joints, endeavored to secure the greatest
amount of elasticity compatible with stability. The Gothic masons, throwing the rein on
the neck of experiment, utilized stone to its utmost capacity. They heaped up stone in
towers that, rising above the lofty roofs of nave and transepts, tapered upwards in slender spires embroidered with lace-like tracery. They suspended it overhead in ponderous
vaults, ornamented so as to seem mere gossamer webs pierced by cunning pendants,
which pleased the fancy of the fifteenth century, and which in reality sustain the very
vaults from which they appear to hang. Finally, emboldened by success, they even ventured to cut granular stone as thin as fibrous wood.
[2] The stability of a Gothic cathedral depends upon the proper adjustment of thrust
and counter-thrust. The collected pressures of the nave vaulting, which are downward
owing to their weight and oblique owing to the arched form of the vault, are counteracted
partially by the dead weight of the outer roof loaded upon the upward extension of the
clear-story walls, and for the rest by arches carried above the aisle roofs to press against
the nave wall, these arches being retained by an outer line of massive buttresses weighted
by pinnacles. Whereas in Roman buildings the buttressing system is often an integral
part of the enormously thick walls, which rise up to weight the haunches of barrel vaults
or domes, in a Gothic building the wall system consists of pieces of wall, or buttresses,
at right angles to the building, to take the collected pressures of the ribbed vault. This
structural contrivance of transmitting the accumulated pressures to the ground is known
as a “flying buttress.” The entire structure consists of a skeleton of piers, buttresses, arches,
and ribbed vaulting, all held in equilibrium by the combination of oblique and vertical
forces neutralizing each other, as is clearly shown by the illustrations which explain the
constructive principles. The walls were thus merely required to enclose and not to support
Gothic Paris |
53
the structure, and indeed they principally consisted of glazed windows with vertical mullions and traceried heads. […]
[3] Gothic architecture, in common with Greek, relies on the evident truthfulness of its
structural features, which in both styles are component parts of the artistic scheme. The
self-contained Greek temple, however, is reposeful in the repetition of its columns and
the severity of its horizontal entablatures, whereas the Gothic cathedral is a complex,
virile structure composed of many vertical features, to which unity was given by a due
observance of relative proportions. Thus in Gothic architecture the features were not left
to mere artistic caprice, but were in the main determined by stern structural utility, as
exemplified in the novel shape of a capital specially designed to support a novel superstructure, and in the ribs of vaults which accurately express their function as sinews to
support the vaulting panels. Although most of the forms were founded primarily on
structural necessity, others were the expression of artistic invention; thus the spire fulfilled
no structural requirement, but it served as a symbol and formed an outward and visible
expression of the religious aspirations of the time and directed the thoughts of men heavenwards. Compared with Greek or Roman monumental construction in masonry, the
Gothic was an architecture of small stones, for easy transport; for fine material was not
usually so immediate to the sites as in Greece, nor was there such a well-developed road
system as the Roman. […]
[4] As a result of the development of the Gothic system of buttresses, walls became less
necessary as supports; but were naturally retained to enclose the building and protect it
against the elements. Another step in the evolution of the style was made possible by the
invention of painted glass, which was forthwith used to form brilliant transparent pictures in the ever-recurring windows which were enclosed under the pointed vaults, which
had, as already explained, been originally adopted for constructive reasons.
Sir Banister Fletcher, A History of Architecture on the Comparative Method (New
York: Scribner’s, 1961, first published 1896), 367–71.
Interaction: Gothic Architecture
Divide into groups of two, each working on a different paragraph and filling in
the key words in the following extracts of Fletcher’s text. Each group then reports
to the class, explaining in their own words features of Gothic architecture that
strike them as important.
[1] The Gothic of the thirteenth century throughout Europe was slowly
evolved from Romanesque architecture and is mainly distinguished by
the introduction and general use of the ______________ […]. This feature, in conjunction with ___________________________________,
gives to the style the ___________ tendency, which has been regarded as
symbolic of the _____________ ____________ of the period.
54
| Paris in Architecture, Literature, and Art
t <(PUIJD BSDIJUFDUT> CZ FNQMPZJOH @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ MBJE JO
shallow courses with thick mortar joints, endeavored to secure the greatest amount of _________________________________. The Gothic
masons, throwing the rein on the neck of experiment, ___________
_________________________. They heaped up stone in towers that,
rising above the lofty roofs of nave and transepts, tapered upwards in
________________________ _____________________________.
[2] The stability of a Gothic cathedral depends upon the proper adjustment
of ____________ ____________________ […] This structural contrivance of transmitting the accumulated pressures to the ground is known
as a “_________________________.” The entire structure consists of a
skeleton of ________________________________________, all held
in equilibrium by the combination of oblique and vertical forces neutralizing each other, as is clearly shown by the illustrations which explain the
constructive principles.
[3] Gothic architecture, in common with Greek, relies on the ___________
____________________________________________, which in both
styles are component parts of the artistic scheme.
t "MUIPVHINPTUPGUIFGPSNTXFSFGPVOEFEQSJNBSJMZPO@@@@@@@@@@@
others were the expression of artistic invention; thus the spire fulfilled no
structural requirement, but it served as a symbol and formed an outward
and visible expression of the ____________________ of the time and
directed the thoughts of men _______________________.
[4] As a result of the development of the Gothic system of buttresses,
walls became less necessary as _____________; but were naturally
retained to ____________________________ and ______________
_______________________. Another step in the evolution of the style
was made possible by the invention of _________________________,
which was forthwith used to form brilliant transparent pictures in the
ever-recurring windows which were enclosed under the pointed vaults,
which had, as already explained, been originally adopted for constructive
reasons.
Observation: Flying Buttresses at Notre-Dame
While Romanesque churches use massive walls around their periphery to counter
the weight of its building, Gothic cathedrals use buttresses perpendicular to the
periphery of the building to serve the same purpose in a much more effective way.
To provide an even lighter and more cost-effective structure, Gothic cathedrals
Gothic Paris |
55
also use flying buttresses extending to a massive pier far from the wall. In the
section through the nave of Notre-Dame (fig. 2.10):
t Color the structure outside the cathedral: buttress walls (filled with side
chapels later on), buttress piers above, flying buttresses in the form of a
semi-arch, and the pyramidal-shaped pinnacles on top of the buttress piers,
that add weight to counteract the lateral thrust of the vault.
t Circle the eight gargoyles. What is their function?
t Draw a 6ft tall person inside the nave, by the scale.
Fig. 2.10. Notre-Dame, section through the nave showing the outside structure of buttresses.
Fig. 2.11. Romanesque and Gothic vaulting systems: (A) A Roman groin vault works well
on a square plan as the semi-circular arches match. (B) Romanesque groin vault (on a rectangular plan): the semi-circular arches do not match in height. (C) Gothic rib vault: pointed
arches can be made any height, for any span, and are the most flexible to fit any plans.
56
| Paris in Architecture, Literature, and Art
Observation: Romanesque and Gothic Vaulting Systems
Look at the drawings figure 2.11 to understand the problem of the Romanesque
vault and how it was solved with the Gothic arch.
t First, notice that a problem occurs when arches are configured to produce
a vault covering a rectangular plan. When the plan is square, like in the
first drawing, the semi-circular arches match in height and width. This
type of vault, a groin vault, was first employed by Romans to cover halls of
great dimensions. But not having rectangular plans posed too much of a
constraint when designing a church, and many solutions were found, none
of which fully satisfying.
t The second drawing with a rectangular plan shows a solution often used
in Romanesque churches: both arches are semi-circular, the crowns of the
intersecting vaults are level, but the arches are not the same height and the
upper part of the smaller arch is raised in a stilted arch.
t The third drawing shows a Gothic vault over a rectangular plan. The pointed
arch can be adjusted in height to fit any span, making the transition from
one space to another imperceptible. To appreciate how much more flexible
the Gothic structure is, we will compare the plans of Saint-Germain-desPrés and Notre-Dame, and see how in Notre-Dame all the elements are
fused to form one continuous space.
Recap: Principles of Gothic Architecture
Using the main ideas above, describe in your own terms the following principles
of Gothic Architecture.
t Materials:
t Structure:
t Relationship between form and structure:
t Walls and windows:
t Esthetic experience:
Underline aspects that strike you as specific to Gothic architecture, and use them
to analyze Gothic Notre-Dame, Sainte-Chapelle and Conciergerie below.
2.2 Île de la Cité, East Side: Religious Power
During the 19C Second Empire, the Île de la Cité loses most of its medieval streets,
considered prone to foment and sustain Parisian insurrections. Baron Haussmann
Gothic Paris |
57
turns the central part of the island into a compound of administrative buildings,
easily accessible to Napoléon III’s horsemen but with little architectural appeal.
However, both tips of the island remain untouched to this day. The eastern end
privately owned by the church, has kept its religious vocation with Gothic NotreDame, along with its urbanism of medieval streets surrounding it. The western
end has kept its governmental vocation, with the Gothic Conciergerie still acting
as the judicial center of France.
Observation: 14C Île de la Cité
Label the 14C plan figure 2.12 with the following:
t (1) Seine, (2) Right Bank (North) and (3) Left Bank (South).
t The 1C Roman Cardo Maximus that has become (4) Rue Saint-Martin
and (5) Rue Saint-Jacques.
t (6) Rue Saint-Denis (right bank).
t Bridges: (7) Pont au Change, (8) Pont Notre-Dame and (9) Petit-Pont.
t (10) Conciergerie (or King’s Palace) with (11) Bonbec Tower, (12)
Tour d’Argent and Tour de César, (13) Clock Tower and (14) King’s
garden.
t (15) Gothic Notre-Dame Cathedral and (16) Sainte-Chapelle.
t (17) House of Héloïse’s Uncle Fulbert, Canon of Notre-Dame (see Letters
of Abélard and Héloïse below).
Fig. 2.12. Île de la Cité, 14C.
58
| Paris in Architecture, Literature, and Art
2.2.1 Gothic Notre-Dame (1163–1245)
Notre-Dame occupies the site of the Temple of Jupiter, built in 1C by Emperor
Tibere. The Nautes column, erected outside the temple and now displayed in
the Cluny Roman Baths, depicts both Roman and Gallic deities, showing the
Romans’ religious tolerance for other beliefs. Saint-Étienne takes the place of the
Temple of Jupiter in the 6C as the first cathedral of Paris, and in 1163, Bishop
Maurice de Sully founds Notre-Dame.
Its construction spans over two centuries (1163–1245), with “change orders”
along the way that bring creative solutions such as flying buttresses. While still
in construction, Notre-Dame is already the site of major religious and political
events. Rarely a place of royal sacraments (except Napoléon’s as we will see in
chapter 5), or royal marriages (with the exception of the wedding of Marguerite
de Valois with Henri de Navarre as we will see in chapter 3), Notre-Dame rather
celebrates victories with the Te Deum (such as for the liberation of Paris during
World War Two) and houses Requiem messes (such as for the funeral service of
de Gaulle and Mitterrand).
Observation: Jean Fouquet, Leaf from the Hours of Etienne Chevalier, Right Hand of God Driving Out Demons, ca. 1452–60
Right Hand of God Driving Out Demons shows a view of Paris in spring, with men
kneeling in an intercessory prayer, answered by God’s hand boring through the
sky dome to chase demons away (fig. 2.13).
t Identify the buildings: in the foreground, the gate in the Philippe Auguste
Wall and the Tower of Nesle parapet (where the men are kneeling). In
the middle ground: the Pont Saint Michel and the Petit Châtelet Fortress
behind, the roof of the Hôtel-Dieu, the tower of the Evêché and NotreDame. In the background, the Saint-Geneviève Mount. On which bank
are the praying men located?
t Describe the scene with men in the front kneeling in an intercessory prayer.
What is God’s answer? How is His presence made visible?
t Compare with the 1317 illumination of Moine Yves, Life of Saint Denis in
chapter 1: the view of Paris, the role of the praying people, and the vaulted
sky with Heaven and Hell.
Victor Hugo, The Hunchback of Notre-Dame, 1831
In the 1790s, the French Revolution extensively damages Notre-Dame along with
any other buildings that had to do with royalty and religion. Victor Hugo, leader
Gothic Paris |
59
Fig. 2.13. Jean Fouquet, Right Hand of God Driving Out Demons, in Hours of Étienne
Chevalier, 1452–60. © The Metropolitan Museum of Art / Art Resource, NY.
60
| Paris in Architecture, Literature, and Art
of the 19C romantic movement (see chapter 5), writes his novel to help inspire a
renewed appreciation for pre-Renaissance buildings and promote the urgent need
to save them. As a result, an extensive and sometimes controversial restoration
takes place in 1845, supervised by Viollet-le-Duc (see chapter 6).
We all know the characters of Quasimodo (“almost made”) and Esmeralda,
although less their tragic story, which has nothing to do with the happy Hollywood
Disney version. In Hugo’s novel, Esmeralda is abandoned by Phaebus, hung at the
Place de Grève, and left in the vault of Montfaucon where Quasimodo embraces
her to his own death. Yet the true heroine of the novel is Notre-Dame herself, with
Book 3 dedicated to her description and the view of Paris from her towers. Here is
Hugo’s description of the main facade and its “vast symphony of stone.”
[1] In the first place, to mention only some of the most important examples, there are
assuredly few more beautiful specimens of architecture than that facade, with the three
doorways with their pointed arches; the border embroidered and fretted with twenty-eight royal niches; the immense central stained-glass window, flanked by its two lateral
windows, like the priest by the deacon and subdeacon; the lofty and light gallery of openwork clover arcades supporting a heavy platform on its slender pillars; last, the two dark
and massive towers with their slate porches—harmonious parts of a magnificent whole,
placed one above the other in five gigantic stories—present themselves to the eye as a
mass yet without confusion, with their innumerable details of statuary, sculpture, and
carving powerfully contributing to the tranquil grandeur of the whole—a vast symphony
of stone, if we may be allowed the expression. It is the colossal work of a people and one
man, like the Iliad or the Romanceros, of which it is a sibling. It is the prodigious product of the forces of the age in which the fancy of the workman, chastened by the genius
of the artist, is seen surging forth in a hundred ways on every stone. In short, it is a sort
of human Creation, powerful and fertile as the Divine Creation, from which it seems to
have borrowed its twofold character of variety and eternity.
Victor Hugo, The Hunchback of Notre-Dame, trans. Catherine Liu (New York:
The Modern Library, 2002), 97–98. Written 1831.
Drawing: Notre-Dame West Facade
With the help of the drawing in figure 2.14, sketch the facade of Notre-Dame,
starting with a square, adding the towers above, and respecting its tripartite composition. Label it with elements given in Victor Hugo’s text:
t “Three doorways with their pointed arches.”
t “The border embroidered and fretted with twenty-eight royal niches,”
which is the Gallery of the Kings. Why does Victor Hugo speak of “niches”
instead of statues of kings?
Gothic Paris |
61
t “The immense central stained-glass window, flanked by its two lateral windows, like the priest by the deacon and subdeacon,” which is the west rose
window. Look for other circular shapes at that level that tie the rose window with the other pointed windows.
t “The lofty and light gallery of open-work clover arcades supporting a
heavy platform on its slender pillars,” which is the Great Gallery. Notice
how the central part of this gallery is open to the sky, and brings an ambiguous reading of the facade, as a square with towers above, or two equal
rectangles.
t “The two dark and massive towers with their slate porches.” Notice that
those towers have no spires or steeples. How would having those change the
facade? Label the twin towers and the spire Viollet-le-Duc placed instead at
the transept crossing in the 19C.
Fig. 2.14. Notre-Dame, west facade, 1200–50.
62
| Paris in Architecture, Literature, and Art
t “A magnificent whole, placed one above the other in five gigantic stories.”
How does this emphasis on horizontals create a tension with the verticals
of the facade?
t Look at the composition of the facade, and explain in which way it is a
“symphony of stone” as expressed by Hugo.
2.2.2 Comparison of Romanesque Saint-Germain-des-Prés,
990–1014, and Gothic Notre-Dame, 1163–1245
Hugues Capet (987–996) founds the Capetian dynasty, at the same time Abbot
Morard rebuilds Saint-Germain-des-Prés (990–1014), one of the very few Romanesque churches left in Paris. Napoléon did not care much for these old churches
and had them torn down at the beginning of the 19C, causing more damage to
the Parisian patrimony than the whole French Revolution.
Observation: Romanesque Saint-Germain-des-Prés and Gothic
Notre-Dame
Although the two structures contain the same elements, notice how Notre-Dame
is twice the size of Saint-Germain. Label the plans in figure 2.15:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Porch
Narthex
Buttress
Side ailes (sometimes double)
Nave
Transept arm
Side chapel
Chancel
Ambulatory
Radiating chapel
Interaction: Comparing Romanesque Saint-Germain-des-Prés
and Gothic Notre-Dame
In groups of two or as a class, consider the following:
t Identify the wall systems in each plan (fig. 2.15): massive walls around the
periphery of Saint-Germain, buttresses perpendicular to the periphery in
Notre-Dame.
Gothic Paris |
Fig. 2.15. Saint-Germain-des-Prés, 990–1014, and Notre-Dame, 1163–1245.
63
64
| Paris in Architecture, Literature, and Art
t Examine how in the Notre-Dame plan, the different components are more
connected and integrated with each other, especially the porch, side-aisles
and transept crossing.
t Compare the outside aspect of the edifices (fig. 2.15). How unified are the
different elements, such as the bell towers and windows?
2.2.3 Notre-Dame’s Portal of the Last Judgment:
Hoffbauer, Paris à travers les âges, 1998
In contrast with the neatly composed west facade, the portals are packed with
sculptures of saints and monsters engaged in all sorts of disorderly actions. In
the Last Judgment portal, man is brought to trial, and goat-like demons lead the
damned to torture in a terrifying vision of Hell.
[1] The Portal of the Judgment, mutilated in the 18C by Soufflot, has been rehabilitated
in its original state; the trumeau that divided the door in two parts has been rebuilt; and
a handsome Christ blessing and holding a closed book, by de Chaume, has replaced the
Christ that Soufflot had removed. The teaching Christ is the very center of this composition, which would be incomprehensible without him. The twelve Apostles are aligned
to the right and to the left, and each one of them, with the precision of this age of faith
when the priests themselves directed the constructions of churches, carries the attribute
that distinguishes him, the sign that gives him a characteristic physiognomy among the
saints, and the instruments of his martyrdom.
[2] Two rows, each composed of six bas-reliefs, put in the presence of each other Vices
and Virtues, which are going to fight over the human heart: although enlightened by the
Revelation of the Gospel held by the Christ, he nevertheless retains through his free will
the power of choosing between good and evil. Grave and noble in his representation of
sacred characters, the Middle Ages artist has treated these episodes of human life with a
natural verve and a realism that make of it as many little tableau de genre. The cathedral,
one must not tire of repeating, was a book where each person was to read and meet a
teaching; art was to conform to this rule, and while contemplating this portal, the least
lettered of our ancestors found the materialized lesson of a scene intelligible to all.
[3] That is how Avarice is represented in the form of a miser, holding a purse and piling
up money in a chest; a knight, who struggles on his horse and spurs it, but will be thrown
to the ground, personifies Temerity. Cowardice has thrown his swords, and runs away
frantic with terror, unaware that only a rabbit purses him. A monk who has left his abbey
symbolizes Indiscipline; he turns back one last time to look for the peaceful cell where he
has left, along with his robe, his happiness and his honor.
[4] Virtues are sitting down, and their movements although calmer are no less expressed
with a rare eloquence. Hope, eyes raised to the sky, waves a standard; Courage, a woman
Gothic Paris |
65
dressed in a coat of mail, holds a sword in her right hand, and in her left hand an écu
on which a lion is distinguishable. Those twelve Virtues and twelve Vices, occupying the
superior zone, are adjoined in a witty dispute and look like the two sides of a human
medal.
[5] At the same height as the allegorical figures, but outside the embrasures, two square
bas-reliefs, alas mutilated, seem to take over the same motif under another form. Abraham, listening to the angel who speaks to him in a cloud, would be the personification
of Obedience; Job laying on his manure, would be the Resignation to testing; a warrior,
who attempts to throw an arrow to the sun, Nemrod, the Ambition wanting to fight the
sky itself.
[6] The first lintel immediately above recalls the terrible scene of the last judgment. At
the call of the trumpet, the dead come out of their tomb; in the middle, Saint Michel
weighs the souls. To the right of the archangel, the elected souls look at the sky, which will
be their sojourn for eternity; to the left, the damned are in the hands of demons. Here
again shines forth the freedom that asserts itself in the Middle Ages churches. Among the
miserable souls whose faces express despair can be seen more than one of the powerful of
the world, more than one of the high personages whom we will meet later in the macabre
dances: a bishop, kings, knights. The crowd, while contemplating these gripping images,
had a new promise of the equality that was to reign beyond Earth, in the regions of definitive justice, where each one would be judged according to his or her merits.
[7] In the lintel above, the Christ again, judging human beings and condemning those
who did not obey to his words. Angels standing by him hold the instruments of Passion;
behind the Christ, the Virgin, John the Baptist and angels, appeal to his mercy.
[8] The six archivolts, admirably restored by Toussaint and de Chaume, work to make
complete the signification of the composition. On the right, elected souls, patriarchs,
prophets, doctors and martyrs complete the assembly of the triumphant Church; on the
left, demons offering all varieties of the dreadful, the antichrist whom Death carries and
lets fall down—all the reproved are agitated by appalling convulsions in the midst of Hell.
M. F. Hoffbauer, Paris à travers les âges (Tours: Bibliothèque de l’Image, 1998),
263–6. Trans. May Spangler.
Observation: Last Judgment Portal
With the help of Hoffbauer’s text, label the drawing of the Last Judgment Portal,
starting from the bottom (fig. 2.16):
t In the embrasures (side of the doors): bas-relief carvings of allegories of
Vices (round medallion) and Virtues (above it).
t Just above the medallions: the Apostles, six on each side of the doors.
66
| Paris in Architecture, Literature, and Art
Fig. 2.16. Notre-Dame: central portal of the Last Judgment, west facade, 1225.
Gothic Paris |
67
t At the same level as his Apostles and as a trumeau figure: the teaching Jesus.
The trumeau is the stone mullion between the two doors.
t Above the doors, the tympanum depicts the last judgment. In the lower
lintel, the dead emerge from their tomb at the blow of trumpets. Among
them, warriors and royalty.
t In the lintel above (still in the tympanum), Saint Michel weighs the souls
(on the right, the damned are enchained and lead to Hell; on the left the
righteous are sent to Heaven).
t At the Apex of the tympanum: another Christ flanked by his mother and
John, who are intervening for the lost souls.
t In the archivolts, on the left side the saved souls in the “lap of Abraham”—a
medieval symbol of Heaven, and on the right side the damned in Hell.
Observation: The Way to Salvation
The Last Judgment presents the way to Salvation, showing each step toward that
goal. First, man has to be told which actions in his daily life make him a sinner.
Look at the level of the embrasures on the two sides of the doors:
t See how Virtues are shown with sitting women holding a medallion of an
animal or an object symbolizing a Virtue, and Vices appear in little scenes
where a person reenacts a vice in an allegory (fig. 2.17). How does it differentiate men from animals? Compare with the allegories of The Romance
of the Rose.
t Describe the Teaching Christ, situated between the two doors (fig. 2.18).
In which way is he more human than divine? What is the Apostles’
role?
t In the archivolts to the left of the call to judgment lintel, identify the patriarchs: Isaac, Jacob and Abraham holding three small souls on their laps (fig.
2.19). Also identify the rewards of Heaven in the new Jerusalem and the
way people act.
t Identify terrors of Hell represented in the archivolts to the right of the
call to judgment lintel (fig. 2.20): cauldron of boiling oil (Revelation
21:8), Death riding a horse (Revelation 6), demons carrying souls away,
black horse rider (Revelation 6)? Can you make out the last two arches,
with punishment for sexual perversion and then a fusion between monsters and damned souls? What is the message given to the beholder at
this point?
68
| Paris in Architecture, Literature, and Art
Fig. 2.17. Embrasure: vices and virtues.
Fig. 2.18. Trumeau: teaching Jesus.
Fig. 2.19. Archivolt to the left: Heaven with the three patriarchs, Isaac, Jacob and Abraham.
Fig. 2.20. Archivolt to the right: Hell with cauldron, blindfolded death, black horse rider, lust.
Figs. 2.17–20. Notre-Dame: central portal of the Last Judgment, 1225.
Gothic Paris |
69
Then the viewer has to understand that all will be judged, and how the judgment will operate. Look at the lower and top lintels:
t When and how are men called to judgment (fig. 2.23)? Who is called to
judgment? Why are there no babies?
t The trial (fig. 2.22): identify and describe Saint Michel weighing souls.
What makes the demon to the right of the scale a monster? What about
the two small people being judged? Does the trial seem fair? How are the
ten elected people acting? What about the ten chained-up damned souls?
t Finally, the viewer is given a message of hope. Examine the sitting Jesus in
the apex (fig. 2.21): clothes, hair, expression, hands and halo. What is his
role in the last judgment?
Interaction: The Notre-Dame Woman
The word anthropomorphism derives from the Greek ἄνθρωπος (ánthrōpos),
“human,” and µορφή (morphē), “shape” or “form.” It is generally defined as the
attribution of human form (or other human characteristics) to what is non-human (a god, an animal or an object). In this study, we will focus on the attribution of human form to architecture. Such anthropomorphism is famously
visible in Leonardo de Vinci’s Vitruvian Man, whose ideal proportions are to
be used by architects in the design of their Renaissance facades (as we will see
in chapter 3).
Since the conception of man vastly differs from one time period to
another, so does its depiction and its reflection into architecture. We therefore
consider depictions of man at different time periods, starting with the
Notre-Dame Woman for the Gothic period in this chapter, the Vitruvian Man
for the Renaissance and classical period, the Monet Man for the impressionist period, the Modulor for the cubist period, and the Halles Woman for the
postmodern period.
However small and humble she may appear to be, the woman in the scale
of Saint Michel holds the very unique central position of the tympanum of the
central portal of Notre-Dame, on the vertical between the teaching Jesus and the
sitting Jesus. She is also at the liminal moment of her judgment: the balance is still
in equilibrium between sending her to Hell or Heaven. Finally, she is kneeling in
an intercessory prayer, and as such a mediator between Earth and Heaven.
Consider the following in the Notre-Dame Woman (fig. 2.24):
t Describe her body, hair, face and expression. How can you tell it is a
woman? What does she do?
70
| Paris in Architecture, Literature, and Art
Fig. 2.21. Apex of tympanum: Christ in Glory with Mary, John, and angels holding nails
and cross.
Fig. 2.22. Middle lintel of tympanum: the trial with Saint Michel weighing souls.
Fig. 2.23. Lower lintel of tympanum: call to judgment.
Figs. 2.21–23. Notre-Dame, Last Judgment Tympanum, 1225.
Gothic Paris |
71
Fig. 2.24. Detail of the trial: Notre-Dame Woman in the scale.
t Look at the geometrical composition of the balance and Notre-Dame
Woman. How many triangles and circles can you find? Why would the top
part of her body be emphasized?
t Examine how the Notre-Dame Woman may embody a Gothic esthetic of
vertical thrust.
2.2.4 Rose Windows at Notre-Dame
When the grandiose South Rose window of Notre-Dame goes up in 1270, it
is such a great event that Saint Louis waits to see it in place before leaving on
72
| Paris in Architecture, Literature, and Art
his second crusade—and the last one since he dies in Tunis. Thomas Aquinas,
professor at the University of Paris and one of the main thinkers of all times,
often visits the building site of Notre-Dame. Here he is portrayed in The Golden
Moments of Notre-Dame de Paris checking out the construction of the South
Rose Window.
Interaction: Thomas Aquinas and the South Rose Window
Going through the portal of the Last Judgment is to be reminded that we eventually will be judged for our sins. Monsters are waiting to grab us, chain us, boil us
and give us the most possible misery. On the other hand, stained-glass windows
bring a radically different message to people: the glorious light triumphs over substance, heightening a spiritual experience that promotes a more direct communication with God. In groups of two, study one panel each of the following aspects
of the BD (bande dessinée or comic book) of The Golden Moments of Notre-Dame
de Paris (fig. 2.25). Then share your results with the class:
t The picture: the location, the people and what they do.
t The text: who is talking to whom, and what they are talking about.
t How do picture and text interact? Which medium gives the most
information?
t Which do you look at first, picture or text?
t Do you feel the information to be trustworthy in both cases?
t Which specific values might BDs have over another form of art? Does it
deserve the appellation of “ninth art”?
Project: Inside and Outside the West Rose
Until Crusaders bring some roses back from the Middle East, they are unknown
in 12C France but for the small version of wild roses. The Notre-Dame 1225 west
rose is built at the time Guillaume de Lorris writes The Romance of the Rose in
1230 (see chapter 1), and while poets celebrate their ephemeral beauty as a symbol of courtly love, in architecture their round pattern represents God’s eternal
and perfect nature. Rose windows in architecture also have the particularity of
combining two mutually dependent parts, the stone tracery mostly visible from
the outside, and the stained glass mostly visible from the inside. On the other
hand, stained-glass windows in general do not have an outside stone tracery of
particular interest and are conceived to only be seen from inside. This distinction brings a special status to rose windows in our study, as analogical operators
between the inside/outside as well as material/immaterial entities.
Gothic Paris |
73
Fig. 2.25. Serge Saint-Michel, Claude Lacroix, and Nadine Voillat, The Golden Moments
of Notre-Dame de Paris, 2006. Reprinted by permission of the publisher: Éditions du
Signe, 2006.
74
| Paris in Architecture, Literature, and Art
Divide into three groups and look for images of the Notre-Dame west rose:
one group from outside, another from inside, and the last group a detail of the
inner quatrefoil showing the month of December (type “west rose segment
BAR800” or look at Paradoxplace.com to find this rose segment).
t Describe the outside view of the west rose window (fig. 2.26): the combination of a circle and a square in its composition, the stone tracery with
the least possible amount of stone, its division in twelve petals for twelve
months, and the way it radiates like the spokes of a wheel. Which feature
of the west rose is the most striking from outside? What message does it
convey?
t Describe the inside view of the west rose window (fig. 2.27): what happened to the stone tracery and colonnettes? How about the petals: how
many, and what may each now represent? Which feature of the west rose
window is the most striking from inside?
Fig. 2.26. Notre-Dame west rose window, outside view.
Gothic Paris |
75
Fig. 2.27. Notre-Dame west rose window, inside view.
t In the inner quatrefoil of the December month, identify a prophet, the vice
of Cowardice, the zodiac sign of the Capricorn, the virtue of Fortitude and
a footsie game. What is the role of humor in it?
t Report to the class and discuss the following:
! How inside and outside views offer radically different experiences, one
of the material world, the other of the immaterial world.
! When a small child, Viollet-le-Duc looking at the rose window of NotreDame would see it turn—which scared him. How could this happen,
and what kind of spiritual experience would it provide?
Observation: “God Help the Outcast,” in Walt Disney’s
The Hunchback of Notre-Dame, 1996
God Help the Outcasts is a soft ballad written by composer Alan Menken and
lyricist Stephen Schwartz, and recorded by American singer and actress Heidi
Mollenhauer as the singing voice of Esmeralda. Esmeralda just took refuge in
Notre-Dame after coming to help of Quasimodo, maltreated by the crowd of
76
| Paris in Architecture, Literature, and Art
people for his deformities. Describe Esmeralda’s physical and spiritual journey as
she walks through the Cathedral:
t Esmeralda starts at the 14C statue of the Virgin and child: how are Mary
and Jesus depicted? Which aspect of the Christ does she relate to?
t When Esmeralda walks in the side-aisle, whom does she pray for? Compare
the parishioners’ prayer with her intercessory prayer.
t She finally gets to the great south rose window in the transept. What is
the effect of light on her? Compare with Abbot Suger’s “anagogical”
transport.
t Which aspect of Esmeralda’s journey, from the statue of the Virgin and
child to the South Rose window, strikes you the most?
2.3 Abélard and Héloïse: To Teach and Punish
Pierre Abélard (1079–1142), one of the greatest 12C intellectuals, makes an especially important contribution in the field of logic. Middle Ages logicians deconstruct declarative statements to discern flawed reasoning in an opponent, through
verbal battles that provide much entertainment to fellow scholars and student
audiences. Abélard’s wit, memory and arrogance make him unbeatable in debate
and earn him much fame and many enemies. His tendency to disputation is
demonstrated in his book Sic et Non, a list of 158 philosophical and theological questions with opposite sides developed for each and no resolution offered.
Although Abélard is repeatedly charged with heresy, his dialectical method
becomes an important feature of western education. Héloïse (1101–1164) receives
her education at Argenteuil, becoming fluent in Latin, Greek and Hebrew, and
achieving renown of her own in the fields of grammar and rhetoric, the two other
branches of classical philosophy.
When they meet in 1117, sixteen-year-old Héloïse lives in the house of
her uncle Fulbert, canon of Notre-Dame Cathedral and a man of influence
in their parish neighborhood, and thirty-eight-year-old Abélard is a renowned
scholar at the Cloister School of Notre-Dame, attracting students from all over
Europe. Their affair results in a son (called Astrolabe, an anagram of “Abélard”),
a secret marriage, Abélard’s tragic castration by Canon Fulbert, and their retreat
to monastic life. Abélard writes Historia Calamitatum as a letter to a friend, and
supposedly not meant for Héloïse, whom he has not seen or contacted in over
ten years.
Gothic Paris |
77
Héloïse’s house on the Île de la Cité has been torn down, but its location is
indicated at the Quai aux Fleurs, and the tomb of Abélard and Héloïse can be
visited in the Père Lachaise cemetery in Paris.
[1] There was in Paris at the time a young girl named Héloïse, the niece of Fulbert, one
of the canons, and so much loved by him that he had done everything in his power to
advance her education in letters. In looks she did not rank lowest, while in the extent of
her learning she stood supreme. A gift for letters is so rare in women that it added greatly
to her charm and had won her renown throughout the realm. I considered all the usual
attractions for a lover and decided she was the one to bring to my bed, confident that I
should have an easy success; for at that time I had youth and exceptional good looks as
well as my great reputation to recommend me, and feared no rebuff from any woman I
might choose to honour with my love. Knowing the girl’s knowledge and love of letters
I thought she would be all the more ready to consent, and that even when separated we
could enjoy each other’s presence by exchange of written messages in which we could
speak more openly than in person, and so need never lack the pleasures of conversation.
[2] All on fire with desire for this girl I sought an opportunity of getting to know her
through private daily meetings and so more easily winning her over; and with this end in
view I came to an arrangement with her uncle, with the help of some of his friends, whereby
he should take me into his house, which was very near my school, for whatever sum he
liked to ask. As a pretext I said that my household cares were hindering my studies and
the expense was more than I could afford. Fulbert dearly loved money, and was moreover
always ambitious to further his niece’s education in letters, two weaknesses which made it
easy for me to gain his consent and obtain my desire: he was all eagerness for my money and
confident that his niece would profit from my teaching. This led him to make an urgent
request which furthered my love and fell in with my wishes more than I had dared to hope;
he gave me complete charge over the girl, so that I could devote all the leisure time left me
by my school to teaching her by day and night, and if I found her idle I was to punish her
severely. I was amazed by his simplicity—if he had entrusted a tender lamb to a ravening
wolf it would not have surprised me more. In handing her over to me to punish as well as
to teach, what else was he doing but giving me complete freedom to realize my desires, and
providing an opportunity, even if I did not make use of it, for me to bend her to my will
by threats and blows if persuasion failed? But there were two special reasons for his freedom
from base suspicion: his love for his niece and my previous reputation for continence.
[3] Need I say more? We were united, first under one roof, then in heart; and so with our
lessons as a pretext we abandoned ourselves entirely to love. Her studies allowed us to
withdraw in private, as love desired, and then with our books open before us, more words
of love than of our reading passed between us, and more kissing than teaching. My hands
strayed oftener to her bosom than to the pages; love drew our eyes to look on each other
more than reading kept them on our texts. To avert suspicion I sometimes struck her, but
these blows were prompted by love and tender feeling rather than anger and irritation, and
were sweeter than any balm could be. In short, our desires left no stage of love-making
78
| Paris in Architecture, Literature, and Art
untried, and if love could devise something new, we welcomed it. We entered on each joy
the more eagerly for our previous inexperience, and were the less easily sated.
Letter 4, Abélard to Héloïse
Héloïse receives Abélard’s “Historia Calamitatum,” and a correspondence follows
between the two that displays their tragic passion as well as their exceptional
scholarly talent. Letter 4 is the last of the Personal Letters exchanged between them
and in response to her complaints of neglect (admirably written and proving her
to be a formidable adversary in verbal battles). Abélard points out that instead
of resenting him, she should pray for him. Like the woman in the scale of Saint
Michel praying for the souls being judged, Abélard asks Héloïse to take the role of
mediator, interceding for him in the eyes of God.
[4] But no crown is waiting for me, because no cause for striving remains. The matter for
strife is lacking in him from whom the thorn of desire is pulled out.
Yet I think it is something, even though I may receive no crown, if I can escape further punishment, and by the pain of a single momentary punishment may perhaps be let
off much that would be eternal. For it is written of the men, or rather, the beasts of this
wretched life, “the beasts have rotten in their dung.” Then too, I complain less that my
own merit is diminished when I am confident that yours is increasing; for we are one in
Christ, one flesh according to the law of matrimony. Whatever is yours cannot, I think,
fail to be mine, and Christ is yours because you have become his bride. Now, as I said
before, you have as a servant me whom in the past you recognized as your master, more
your own now when bound to you by spiritual love than one subjected by fear. And so I
have increasing confidence that you will plead for us both before him and, through your
prayer, I may be granted what I cannot obtain through my own […].
Pierre Abélard, The Letters of Abélard and Héloïse, trans. Betty Radice (London:
Penguin Book, 1974), 66–68 and 154. Writtten in 1132.
Observation: Abélard, Historia Calamitatum, 1132
t [1] How does Abélard describe Héloïse? How about himself? What does
the last sentence of the first paragraph might foresee?
t [2] How does Abélard manipulate Héloïse’s uncle? Is it very astute of him
when you know her uncle will eventually castrate him?
t “To punish as well as to teach”: which aspect of a teacher-student relationship does Abélard emphasize?
t [3] Examine how studying and lovemaking are intertwined, and how
Abélard and Héloïse put the same curiosity in love as they would in any
intellectual subject.
Gothic Paris |
79
t [4] Explain why Abélard cannot make up for his sins of the flesh. What
does he ask Héloïse to do for him?
Observation: Illumination of Abélard and Héloïse, 14C
After a separation of twelve years, Abélard and Héloïse meet again when she gets
expelled with other nuns from the Argenteuil Abbey. He hands the Paraclete
over to her, an oratory he has founded near Troyes and where she becomes the
Abbess. Little more than a few rough buildings, she turns the Paraclete into one
of the most distinguished religious houses of France. Look at the illumination of
Héloïse, now an Abbess, meeting and debating with Abélard (fig. 2.28).
t Describe their general aspect, as well as elements of symmetry and dissymmetry in the composition of the illumination.
Fig. 2.28. Abélard and Héloïse, illumination from a 14C manuscript of Le Roman de la
Rose. © RMN-Grand Palais / Art Resource, NY.
80
| Paris in Architecture, Literature, and Art
t Describe the emotions displayed on their face. Why may they differ?
t Examine their hand gestures. What kind of triangle do their two open
hands form? What do they both point to? How about their two other
hands: what do they each point to? How does this triangle differ from the
first one?
t Examine Abélard’s crossed leg. Given his castration, what may it stand for?
On the other hand, what is he doing with his right foot?
2.4 Île de la Cité, West Side: Political Power
The Conciergerie and Sainte-Chapelle are part of what is today the Palais de
Justice, taking up the west side of the Île de la Cité. During the Roman occupation, we saw how the east side of the island is already established as religious with
the temple of Mercury. Likewise, the west side already houses the Roman administrative and military headquarters, as well as the governor’s residence. In the 5C,
Clovis makes it his royal palace, and the early Capetian kings fortify the Palais
de la Cité and add a keep. When Charles V moves to the Louvre in the 14C, he
installs in the palace the headquarters of the French treasury, the judicial system
and the Parliament of Paris, an assembly of nobles.
Observation: Saint-Louis, Gothic Sainte-Chapelle, 1242–48
Louis IX (1226–70), who waited for the Notre-Dame south rose to be set up
before leaving for his second crusade, is such a popular king he is canonized SaintLouis after his death. He is remembered in particular for changing the justice
system by forbidding duels (where the loser was considered condemned by God),
and by requiring judges to hear the exposition of the event as well as the witnesses’
deposition. Saint-Louis himself renders justice in the royal garden of his palace, or
under an oak tree in Vincennes as the tradition goes.
During his first crusade, Saint Louis buys the relics of the Christ from the
Emperor of Constantinople, which he believes to be the thorn crown and a
piece of the cross. Notre-Dame is not finished yet, and he gives them a sanctuary in the Sainte-Chapelle built in the record time of thirty-three months, and
for less than a third of the price paid for the relics. During the French Revolution, the shrine is melted down, and some of the saved relics are now in NotreDame. The Sainte-Chapelle is the most extravagantly daring piece of Gothic
architecture. The stone structure is bared to slender piers, leaving space for the
glorious beauty of giant stained-glass windows.
Gothic Paris |
81
t With the help of the Notre-Dame plan, label the components of the
Sainte-Chapelle upper chapel plan (fig. 2.29): porch, narthex, nave, transept, chancel, high altar, buttresses, side aisles, side-chapels, radiating chapels and ambulatory.
t Which elements are missing in the Sainte-Chapelle, and how would it
affect the inside appearance of the nave and chancel in comparison with
Notre-Dame?
t Looking at the outside view of the Sainte-Chapelle on figure 2.30, how do
you explain that the armature of slender piers is not reinforced by flying
buttresses, as is the case in Notre-Dame?
t Compare the lower chapel and upper chapel plans (fig. 2.29).
Observation: Philippe le Bel, Gothic Conciergerie, 1313
King Philippe le Bel (English: Philip the Fair), with “bel” being the masculine
form of “belle” in old French, has nothing beautiful about him. He is remembered for unjustly fighting the Templars, an order founded in Jerusalem in 1119
to protect the pilgrims traveling to Palestine, torturing and burning them sometimes without a trial. The location is indicated with a sign in the Vert-Galant
Square at the west tip of the island, as we will see in André Breton’s Free Rein in
chapter 9.
Philippe le Bel considerably modifies the Palais de la Cité, making it a Gothic
Palace with large parts surviving today in the Conciergerie. Designed to embody
his power in a magnificent palace, the Palais de la Cité has, however, mostly been
used throughout history as a place of imprisonment, torture and death—which
seems befitted to Philippe le Bel’s ruthless personal style. The Conciergerie is controlled by the concierge, a noble entrusted with an extensive legal and police
authority. It serves as a prison from the 14C, and during the French Revolution,
there are as many as 1,200 people imprisoned at the same time, with most of
them ending up at the guillotine. Identify the following buildings in the 1313
plan of the Palais de la Cité (fig. 2.32):
t (1) The Tour Bonbec, the western-most and oldest of the four medieval
towers, built by Saint-Louis along with the Sainte-Chapelle. “Bonbec”
means “good beak”: prisoners were interrogated and tortured until they
would talk.
t (2) The twin Tour d’Argent (English: Silver Tower, where the royal treasure
was kept) and Tour de César (built on Roman foundation), which flanked
82
| Paris in Architecture, Literature, and Art
Fig. 2.29. Sainte-Chapelle, 1248: lower and upper chapel plans.
Fig. 2.30. Sainte-Chapelle: outside view.
Fig. 2.31. Sainte Chapelle: inside view.
Gothic Paris |
83
the entrance to the Palace until the ground level was raised twenty-three
feet higher to accommodate the Quai de l’Horloge.
t (3) The square Tour de l’Horloge (English: Clock Tower) that has housed
since 1370 the first public clock and never ceased to work since.
t (4) The Conciergerie courtyard where the concierge kept track of
prisoners.
t The three surviving 14C Gothic halls of the Conciergerie: (5) the Salle
des Gardes (Hall of the Guards) behind the twin towers entrance, leading
to (6) the huge colonnaded Salle des Gens d’Armes (Hall of the Men at
Arms), 69 m long and 27 m wide, with a four aisles stone vaulted ceiling
supported by 25 round piers. Erected for the soldiers who protected the
king as well as a refectory for his household, it was used as a communal
jail during the Revolution. (7) The Saint-Louis kitchen with its four corner
fireplaces, each large enough to roast an entire ox.
t Other buildings that have been replaced include (8) the Palais de SaintLouis, (9) the Jardin du Roi (King’s Garden) with its arched walkways, (10)
the Cour des Comptes with the treasury of the kingdom, and (11) the keep
of the Grosse Tour built in the 12C and demolished in 1776.
t (12) The Sainte-Chapelle, built in 1248.
Observation: The Conciergerie Today
Identify the following elements in figure 2.33 of the northern facade of the Palais
de Justice today:
t The western-most Tour Bonbec, the twin Tour d’Argent and Tour de César
and the square Tour de l’Horloge.
t The buildings between the towers are from the 19C rebuilding of the Palace, with facades dressed-up as medieval. The facade at the west of the Tour
Bonbec follows the classical architecture of the Louvre with an avant-corps
pavilion in the middle.
t Identify the steeple of the Sainte-Chapelle emerging above the Palais de
Justice.
Observation: Limbourg Brothers, The Very Rich Hours of
the Duke of Berry, 1440
The Duke of Berry, known for taking his swans and bears along while traveling
from castle to castle, is a great art collector who commissions The Very Rich Hours
in 1416. Books of hours contain prayers for specific hours of the day, days of the
84
| Paris in Architecture, Literature, and Art
Fig. 2.32. Philippe le Bel, plan of Palais de la Cité in 1313, with the Conciergerie.
Fig. 2.33. Conciergerie today, with its four towers and the Sainte-Chapelle steeple behind.
Gothic Paris |
85
week, months and seasons, and are usually beautifully illuminated with some of
the finest works of medieval art. Consider the following in figure 2.34:
t Where is the scene located? How does the point of view differ from 1460
Fouquet’s Right Hand of God Driving out Demons?
t Describe the foreground scene. How is the month of June depicted?
t Identify the royal residence in the middle with the Grosse Tour behind,
both destroyed.
t Describe the Conciergerie: name the four towers facing the other branch of
the Seine that still remain today. Identify the Grande Salle covered by two
parallel pointed wooden barrel vaults, rebuilt as the Salle des Pas Perdus in
1618. The original colonnaded Salle des Gens d’Armes lies underneath.
t Identify the crenelated wall, the garden of the king behind, and the small
pavilion on the Seine with stairs leading to a low island where the Templars
were burnt.
t Describe the Sainte-Chapelle: piers, pinnacles, rose window and spire.
Compare its proportions with Notre-Dame’s. What is the effect of its
verticality?
t Describe the vaulted sky, with the stars in the greater sphere, the path of the
moon, and the path of the sun at the center. How does this cosmic clock
differ from the vaulted sky in Right Hand of God Driving out Demons and
Life of Saint-Denis?
2.5 Pissing the Parisians Off:
François Rabelais, Gargantua, 1534
The 16C is a time of innovation for the French language as it transitions from
Latin. The first grammar book is published in 1530, the first dictionary in 1539,
and we will see in the next chapter how the Pleiade group in 1549 launches modern poetry. Meanwhile, Rabelais belongs to a period when French is not yet codified, and he enriches the French language through his astoundingly creative use of
Greek, Latin, Italian and French dialect—although at times with a crudeness that
may shock a modern reader.
Rabelais also writes from a Christian humanist perspective, considering that
knowledge and wisdom come from the study of Latin and Greek authors. He
eventually leaves the Benedictine order to study medicine, and as a medical doctor, he admires the mechanisms of the human body in all its forms, as we will see
below.
86
| Paris in Architecture, Literature, and Art
Fig. 2.34. Limbourg Brothers, Month of June, in The Very Rich Hours of the Duke of Berry,
ca. 1440. © RMN-Grand Palais / Art Resource, NY.
Gothic Paris |
Chapter XVII
How Gargantua paid his welcome to the Parisians, and how he took away the great Bells
of our Lady’s Church.
[1] Some few days after that they had refreshed themselves, he went to see the city, and
was beheld of every body there with great admiration; for the people of Paris are so
sottish, so badot, so foolish and fond by nature, that a juggler, a carrier of indulgences,
a sumpter-horse, or mule with cymbals, or tinkling bells, a blind fiddler in the middle
of a cross lane, shall draw a greater confluence of people together, than an Evangelical
preacher. And they pressed so hard upon him, that he was constrained to rest himself
upon the towers of Our Lady’s Church. At which place, seeing so many about him, he
said with a loud voice, “I believe that these buzzards will have me to pay them here my
welcome hither, and my Proficiat. It is but good reason. I will now give them their wine,
but it shall be only in sport.” Then smiling, he untied his fair braguette, and drawing out
his mentul into the open air, he so bitterly all-to-be-pissed them, that he drowned two
hundred and sixty thousand four hundred and eighteen, besides the women and little
children. Some, nevertheless, of the company escaped this piss-flood by mere speed of
foot, who, when they were at the higher end of the university, sweating, coughing, spitting and out of breath, they began to swear and curse, some in good earnest, and others
in jest. “Carimari, carimara : golynoly, golynolo. By my sweet Sanctesse, we are washed in
sport,” a sport truly to laugh at; in French, Par ris, for which that city hath been ever since
called Paris, whose name formerly was Leucotia, as Strabo testifieth, lib. quarto, from
the Greek word LEVKORNS, whiteness,—because of the white thighs of the ladies of
that place. And forasmuch as, at this imposition of a new name, all the people that were
there swore everyone by the Sancts of his parish, the Parisians, which are patched up of
all nations, and all pieces of countries, are by nature both good jurors, and good jurists,
and somewhat overweening; whereupon Joanninus de Baurrauco, libro de copiositate
reverentiarum, thinks that they are called Parisians, from the Greek word PARRNSIA
which signifies boldness and liberty of speech.
[2] This done, he considered the great bells, which were in the said towers, and made
them sound very harmoniously. Which whilst he was doing, it came into his mind, that
they would serve very well for tingling Tantans, and ringing Campanels, to hang about
his mare’s neck, when she should be sent back to his father, as he intended to do, loaded
with Brie cheese, and fresh herring. And indeed he forthwith carried them to his lodging.
In the mean while there came a master beggar of the friars of St. Anthony, to demand
in his canting way the usual benevolence of some hoggish stuff, who, that he might be
heard afar off, and to make the bacon he was in quest of shake in the very chimnies, made
account to filch them away privily. Nevertheless, he left them behind very honestly, not
for that they were too hot, but that they were somewhat too heavy for his carriage. This
was not he of Bourg, for he was too good a friend of mine.
[3] All the city was risen up in sedition, they being, as you know, upon any slight occasion, so ready to uproars and insurrections, that foreign nations wonder at the patience
87
88
| Paris in Architecture, Literature, and Art
of the kings of France, who do not by good justice restrain them from such tumultuous
courses, seeing the manifold inconveniences which thence arise from day to day. Would
to God, I knew the shop wherein are forged these divisions and factious combinations,
that I might bring them to light in the confraternities of my parish! Believe for a truth,
that the place wherein the people gathered together, were thus sulphured, hopurymated,
moiled, and be-pissed, was called Nesle, where then was, but now is no more, the Oracle
of Leucetia. There was the case proposed, and the inconvenience showed of the transporting of the bells. After they had well ergoted pro and con, they concluded in baralipton,
that they should send the oldest and most sufficient of the faculty unto Gargantua, to
signify unto him the great and horrible prejudice they sustained by the want of those
bells. And notwithstanding the good reasons given by some of the university, why this
charge was fitter for an orator than a sophister, there was chosen for this purpose our
Master Janotus de Bragmardo.
François Rabelais, The Works of Francis Rabelais, trans. Sir Thomas Urquhart and
Motteux (London: H. G. Bohn, 1854), 153–56. Written in 1534.
Observation: Rabelais Paris
t [1] Describe Rabelais’ Paris. What critique does he make of the Catholic
Church when writing that a “carrier of indulgences” attracts Parisians more
than an “Evangelical” preacher?
t [1] What happens on the towers of Notre-Dame? Analyze the comic aspect
of the passage.
t [1] Is the etymological explanation of the name of Paris convincing?
Explain.
t [2–3] Look at how Parisians are presented in the episode of the stolen bells.
t What are some particularities of Rabelais’ language? Give an example that
strikes you.
Interaction: Rabelais’ Testament
Rabelais wrote the following one sentence testament: “I have nothing, I owe a
great deal, and the rest I leave to the poor.” What would your one sentence testament be? Share with the class.
Illustration Credits
All illustrations and photos are by May Spangler: © May Spangler, except the
following:
Cover
Photo by Stuart Spangler; design by Ben Spangler, brightfoxagency.com.
Chapter 1
Fig. 1.2–3: Astérix®-Obélix® / © 2016 Les Editions Albert René / Goscinny—Uderzo
Fig. 1.4: HIP / Art Resource, NY.
Fig. 1.5: Bridgeman-Giraudon / Art Resource, NY.
Fig. 1.6: BnF.
Fig. 1.7: © RMN-Grand Palais / Art Resource, NY.
Fig. 1.8–9: © BnF, Dist. RMN-Grand Palais / Art Resource, NY.
Fig. 1.10: The Image Works.
Fig. 1.11: The Image Works.
Fig. 1.12: Le Paysage urbain © Apur.
408
| Paris in Architecture, Literature, and Art
Chapter 2
Fig. 2.13: © The Metropolitan Museum of Art / Art Resource, NY.
Fig. 2.25: C. Lacroix, S. St Michel, Editions du Signe.
Fig. 2.28: © RMN-Grand Palais / Art Resource, NY.
Fig. 2.34: © RMN-Grand Palais / Art Resource, NY.
Chapter 3
Fig. 3.7: Scala / Art Resource, NY.
Fig. 3.16: The Image Works.
Fig. 3.17: Scala / White Images / Art Resource, NY.
Chapter 4
Fig. 4.7: © RMN-Grand Palais / Art Resource, NY.
Chapter 5
Fig. 5.1: © RMN-Grand Palais / Art Resource, NY.
Fig. 5.8: © RMN-Grand Palais / Art Resource, NY.
Chapter 6
Fig. 6.1: © RMN-Grand Palais / Art Resource, NY.
Fig. 6.10: Private Collection / Bridgeman Images.
Chapter 7
Fig. 7.6: © RMN-Grand Palais / Art Resource, NY.
Fig. 7.7: Art Resource, NY.
Fig. 7.9: Kimbell Art Museum, Fort Worth, Texas / Art Resource, NY.
Fig. 7.10: HIP / Art Resource, NY.
Fig. 7.11: The Art Institute of Chicago / Art Resource, NY.
Fig. 7.12: © RMN-Grand Palais / Art Resource, NY.
Illustration Credits |
409
Fig. 7.17: Oil on panel, 9 ½ u 6 (24.1 u 15.2 cm). Museum purchase, William H.
Noble Bequest Fund, 1979.48. Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco.
Chapter 8
Fig. 8.4: Pablo Picasso: © 2016 Estate of Pablo Picasso / Artists Rights Society
(ARS), New York. Scala / Art Resource, NY.
Fig. 8.5: Picasso, Violin, 1914. Pablo Picasso: © 2016 Estate of Pablo Picasso /
Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York © CNAC/MNAM/Dist. RMNGrand Palais / Art Resource, NY
Fig. 8.6: Erich Lessing / Art Resource, NY.
Fig. 8.7: Photo: Jean-Claude Planchet. © CNAC/MNAM/Dist. RMN-Grand
Palais / Art Resource, NY.
Fig. 8.14–15: © F.L.C. / ADAGP, Paris / Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York
2017.
Chapter 9
Fig. 9.9–10: Albin Spangler.
Fig. 9.11: © 2017 Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York / ADAGP, Paris, and
The Image Works.
Chapter 10
Fig. 10.2: Thibault Peyron.
Fig. 10.3: Ondine Peyron.