MBS TEXTE 34
2. Jahrgang
M ARTIN
BUCER
S EMINAR
2005
Thomas K. Johnson
Interpreting the Ten
Commandments:
A Study in Special
Hermeneutics
R
2
MINA
SE
MARTI
BUCER
N
EPH 4 :1
Theological
Accents
Theologische Akzente
Table
of Contents
Inhaltsverzeichnis
1Thenegativeimpliesthepositive........................................... 5
2Adirectprohibitionofanactionmakesimproper
moralrationalizingmoredifficult......................................... 5
3Ifweinterpretthecommandmentsproperly,
wewillbeconfrontedinoursinfulness................................. 6
4TheDecalogueisasharpeningandclarificationof
thegeneralrevelationofGod‘slawthroughcreation............ 7
5TheTenCommandmentseachbuildonandprotect
animportantdimensionofthecreationorder....................... 7
6TheTenCommandmentsweregiventousin
aparticularorganicorder...................................................... 9
7TheTenCommandmentscontainadynamic
dialoguebetweenlawandgrace.......................................... 10
8Reflections.......................................................................... 11
Furtherreading...................................................................... 12
TheAuthor............................................................................ 13
Impressum............................................................................. 14
ThisstudyisbroadlyinformedbyacoursesyllabuswrittenbyLambertPonsteinforstudentsat
HopeCollegeandalsobythelecturesofGeorgeForellattheUniversityofIowa.
1.Aufl.2005
Interpreting the Ten Commandments ...
Interpreting the Ten Commandments:
A Study in Special Hermeneutics
Thomas K. Johnson
People often have strong feelings
about the Ten Commandments. Just
acoupleyearsagoAmericansobserved
thestrangespectacleofanationaljudge
orderingastatejudgetoremoveanartisticportrayaloftheDecaloguefromthe
courthouse. But then a large group of
citizens gather-ed to protest the removal.Boththoseinpowerandthoseon
thestreetshadstrongandopposedfeelingsaboutGod‘slaw,whichmayserve
as a good illustration about how our
world feels about the rules written in
stone:somelovethem,somehatethem,
and many love and hate them at the
sametime.
Possibly the intensely contradictory
feelings about the Decalogue, and
especiallythehatredofthecommandments,couldarisefromseriousmisinterpretations. Surely there are serious
misunderstandingsofeachofthecommandments, but there are also serious
misinterpretations of the Decalogue
asawhole.Infifteenyearsofteaching
philosophyandreligioninsecularuniversities, I have repeated heard two
misunderstandings of God‘s law as a
whole. The first says that these commandmentsarearbitraryandirrational,
thattheyhavenoconnectiontohuman
MBS TEXTE 34
nature or human well-being, and that
theydonotcontributetohumanhappiness. Though it is seldom said so
directly,someseemtothinkthatifyou
wanttohaveamiserableandmessedup
life, you just have to follow these old
fashioned, irrational rules. This first
misunderstanding makes it important
to emphasize the organic connection
betweentheDecalogueandthenatural
morallaworcreatedmoralorder.The
second misinterpretation says that the
main purpose of the Ten Commandmentsisthatpeopleneedtoknowhow
toearnGod‘sfavor.Ifyouwanttogo
toheaven,ifyouwanttobesureyouare
acceptedbyGod,ifyouwanttoovercomeyourguiltandsin,itissaid,you
mustkeepthecommandments.Thisis
themostcommonmisinterpretationof
the Decalogue as a whole, and it is so
commonbecauseitissodeeplyrooted
in our sinful nature, the nature that
keepsonwhispering,„Ifweneedtobe
saved,wecandoitourselves.“Because
ofthissecond,standardmisunderstandingofthepurposeofthelaw,wemust
alwaysemphasizethecontrastbetween
Law and Gospel. The gospel tells us
that we are justified by faith alone, a
faiththattrustsinthepromiseofGod
3
Thomas K. Johnson
of forgiveness based on the death and
resurrectionofChrist.Thegospeltells
usthattheproperpurposesofthelaw
mustbesomethingotherthantellingus
howtoearnGod‘sfavor.
So what are the proper purposes
of God‘s law, if not to earn salvation?
Thereareatleastthreeproperpurposes
or uses of the moral law that seem to
standuptocriticalscrutiny,andnoneof
themhavetodowithearningsalvation.
1.God‘slawshowsusoursinandneed
forthegospel.Thisiscommonlycalled
the„theologicaluse“or„convertinguse“
ofGod‘slaw.Whetheratthebeginning
of our life of faith or on a continuing
basisovermanyyearsoflivingbyfaith,
God‘slawdrivesustocryout,„God,be
merciful to me, a sinner.“ By showing
usoursin,thelawdrivesustolovethe
gospel ever more strongly, for in the
gospel we learn about forgiveness, justification,andadoptionasGod‘schildren. 2. The law also restrains our sin,
so we do not act out all of the sinful
tendenciesinourhearts.Thisissometimescalledthe„political“useofthelaw,
usingtheancientmeaningoftheword
„polis“,whichiscommunity.Oursinis
sopowerfulthatifitisnotrestrained,
thecommunitiesforwhichGodcreated
usareeasilyturnedintothetotalchaos
ofthe„warofallagainstall“.ButGod‘s
lawcomestousawidevarietyofways,
somenotsopure,includingconscience,
reason,civillaw,family,andscripture,
withtheeffectofnormallyrestraining
oursinatleastpartially.Inthiswayit
is a primary means of God‘s common
orcivilizinggrace,whichmakeslifein
4
society possible most of the time. For
thisreason,thisisalsocalledthe„civil“
useofthemorallaw.3.ThelawofGod
also provides a norm or standard for
thelifeofgratitude.Becauseofthetremendous grace we have been given in
the gospel, our entire lives should be
an expression of thankfulness to God,
butthisgratitudeneedssomestructure
anddirection.Thiswefindinthecommandsinthescriptures,whicharenot
only the condemning law but also, by
the Spirit, the empowering directives
anddescriptionsofthenewpossibilities
forbelievers.Thelawdescribestherestored life which God wants us to live
forhisglory.
We must notice and say over and
over again that none of the proper
usesofGod‘slawhaveanythingtodo
with earning God‘s favor or salvation.
Therearemultiplevalidandgooduses
ofGod‘slaw,andinlifeexperiencethe
varioususesmaytendtoslidetogether,
butearningourwaytoheavenisnota
properuseofGod‘slaw.
If very strong feelings about God‘s
lawareoftenconnectedwithmistaken
interpretations as well as with mistakenusesofGod‘slaw,weshouldtryto
articulate clear principles of interpretation and application. The following
seven principles have been developed
byarangeoftheologians,ethicists,and
biblescholars.Theyarepresentedhere
asakindofcompendiumorshortstudy
forthosewhomaynotbeabletoread
extensively in Christian ethics or hermeneutics. Serious students will want
toreadmuchfarther.
THEOLOGISCHE AKZENTE
Interpreting the Ten Commandments ...
I The negative implies the
positive
Many of the commandments are
phrased in the negative, „you shall
not...“ From that starting point a
mature, morally sensitive reader can
normally see the positive expectation
ofaparticularcommandment,whatwe
shoulddo.SinceGoddidnotmakeus
to be robots or computers, apparently
hewantsustoengageintheprocessof
considering the positive demand implied by the negative prohibition. For
example, Commandment 6 says, „You
shall not murder“. If you are able to
readthisarticle,youprobablyalsohave
the ability to think out the positive
demandofCommandment6,thatGod
wantsustoprotectandcareforthelives
ofpeople.Evenifnomurderdetective
is hot on your trail, you are not finishedwiththiscommandment.Weare
requiredtotreatthepeoplewemeetas
imagesorreflectionsoftheLordhimself. But even that does not complete
ourobligations.Wehavetothinkabout
society very generally. What is there
that we could do to protect and care
forthelivesofotherpeopleinourcity,
our country, and beyond? Obedience
tothiscommandmentgoesfarbeyond
avoiding murder. It should make us
considerlongandhardwhatweneedto
do to protect people’s lives and safety.
Thereisadirectspirituallinefromthis
commandmenttoactionslikeworking
to abolish slavery, starting orphanages, providing disaster assistance, and
endingabortion.Ifthenegativeprohi-
MBS TEXTE 34
bitionimpliesandassumesthepositive
demand, we can spend a lifetime learningtoobeythewillofGod.
Ifwearemorallysensitivereadersof
theDecalogue,wemustdosomething
likethiswithmostoftheten.Wewill
beginaprocessofthinking,consideration, and action that can change our
lives,families,andcommunities.
2 A direct prohibition of an
action makes improper
moral rationalizing more
difficult
Thisisamoralconsiderationthatalso
hastodowiththenegativephrasingof
the commandments. One can understandthisbycontrastingaverygeneral
moral principle like „private property“
with God‘s commandment, „You
shall not steal“. Of course the general
moral principle is very good and has
much value in life and society. But in
amomentofweaknessortemptationit
is much more powerful for us sinners
tohavetheexplicitnegativecommand
echoinginthebackofourminds.The
commandment confronts us precisely
at the point of our weakness. It puts
a name on the sinful act we might
otherwise prefer to leave unnamed
and unnoticed, and we sinners would
prefer to leave our sins unnamed and
unnoticed.Ofcoursethenegativeconfrontationisuncomfortableforus,but
preciselythismoraldiscomfortmaybe
whatisnecessarytorestrainsomeofour
destructiveinstincts.Manyofthecom-
5
Thomas K. Johnson
mandments can be rephrased as positive, general moral principles, and as
suggestedabove,thisisagoodthingto
do.Ifdoneproperly,thiswillbeextremely challenging, even life changing.
But this must never replace the negative, confrontational format in which
God chose to give the commands. All
toooftenoursinfulnaturewouldseek
tofindgoodsoundingrational/ethical
reasonsfordoingwhatissimplywrong.
Thenweneedtobeconfrontedbythe
divine„Youshallnot“!
3 If we interpret the
commandments properly,
we will be confronted in our
sinfulness
IfGodhadgiventhecommandments
toAdamandEvepriortothefallinto
sin,thedisturbingword„NOT“might
havebeenavoided.Butsincethefall,all
ofus,thesonsanddaughtersofAdam
and Eve, need to be continually confronted with our sin. One could say
we need to get to know ourselves as
God sees us, and that means getting
toknowourselvesassinners.Thisself
knowledge is not something that one
learnssimplyandquickly,likeabitof
information;itisacontinualprocessof
learningthatlastsalifetime,something
like the process of learning wisdom.
The commandment says „You shall
not“,towhichadarkvoiceinoursouls
sometimesstillreplies,„ButIwantto“.
Inthisexperienceweencounteroneof
the darkest sides of sin: sometimes we
6
wanttodosomethingsimplybecauseit
iswrong.Thisleadstotheunpleasant
collisionwiththelittleword„not“.
Thisexperienceisakeythathelpsus
understand the continually recurring
controversyaboutthepublicdisplayof
theTenCommandments.Ifonereads
theAmericanlegaldocumentssurroundingthiscontroversy,onewillprobably
findcompetingtheoriesabouttheseparationofchurchandstate.Someofus
thinkthataslongasthestatedoesnot
fund or directly promote a particular
church, and as long as no church is
controlling the state, we have enough
separationofchurchandstate.Others
seem to want almost no contact between any state agency and anything
vaguely religious, even symbols or terminology, perhaps an impossible goal.
Butthisdisagreementmightbeaquiet
debateamongscholars,wereitnotfor
the intense reactions people have to
the Ten Commandments. The law of
God makes us feel guilty because we
are guilty; there is no escaping this
unpleasanttruth.Ifwearebelievers,it
pushesustomoredeeplyappreciatethe
gospelofforgivenessinChrist.Butthe
personwhodoesnotacceptforgiveness
in Christ may simply become angry,
and this anger may be taken out on
peoplewhohaveadifferentreactionto
God‘slaw.
THEOLOGISCHE AKZENTE
Interpreting the Ten Commandments ...
4 The Decalogue is a
sharpening and clarification
of the general revelation of
God‘s law through creation
We should normally speak of two
revelationsfromGod,hisspecialrevelationthroughChristandScriptureand
hisgeneralrevelationthroughcreation.
Thereareverysignificantdifferencesin
content between the two revelations:
special revelation has Christ and the
gospelatitsverycenter,whereasgeneralrevelationcontainsonlyvaguehints
about grace; general revelation gives
us a sense of God‘s majesty and holiness,whereasspecialrevelationgivesus
much more specific information about
God‘s character and also explains his
mercy;byspecialrevelationGod‘slaw
was specifically written on stone at
Sinai,whereasbygeneralrevelationhis
law was partly written in the human
heartandmind.Thismeansthateven
if people do not acknowledge it and
do not like it, they know something
aboutthedemandsofGod‘slaw.This
knowledge comes through conscience,
throughfeelingsfortheneedsofothers,
throughthinkingaboutwhatisrational
forpeopletodo,throughrelationships,
and through the everyday demands of
life. We could call it an unrecognized
demand, because some do not want
to recognize that the demand comes
from the Almighty. It is this unrecognizeddemandthatisaprimarymeans
ofGod‘scommon,civilizinggracethat
helps keep life in society somewhat
humane, and which also can prepare
MBS TEXTE 34
peopletoseetheirneedforthegospel.
Because of this general revelation of
God‘slaw,alsocalledthenaturalmoral
law, the Ten Commandments are not
exactly „new“ or „news“. Reading or
hearing the Decalogue is more like
taking passive knowledge and making
it active or like taking subconscious
knowledge and making it conscious.
Forsomeitmaybelikerememberinga
pleasantdream,forothersitismorelike
being pushed back into a frightening
nightmare because of the demanding
LawGivertheyhopedtoavoid.
People just know that murder, stealing, lying, and adultery are wrong,
even when they try to defend their
foolish actions. People just know we
should practice love, justice, honesty,
faithfulnessandcourage,evenifsome
maynotwanttoadmitthatweknow.
This is because of God‘s general revelation. We should not talk as if the
TenCommandmentsprimarilygiveus
newinformationthatwedidnothave
before. The written law of God takes
the demand that may have previously
been unrecognized and makes it more
clear,conscious,andprecise,whilealso
emphasizing that this demand comes
fromourCreator.
5 The Ten Commandments
each build on and protect an
important dimension of the
creation order
Each of the commandments makes
certain assumptions about human life
7
Thomas K. Johnson
andthecreatedmoralorder.Becauseof
therealityofthiscreatedorder,itispossibleforpeopletoabusethisorderorgo
the wrong direction within this order.
Someexampleswillmakethisclear.
We are commanded, „You shall not
bear false witness against your neighbor“.Acrucialassumptionofthiscommandment is that words are powerful
and play a large role in relationships
andinsociety.Thisisadistinctdimension or structure of the created moral
order. Part of the image of God in us
isthatourwordsmakethingshappen;
after all, God created the whole universe by speaking. We also create by
meansofwords,includingplans,policies,goals,reports,andeventhewords
wespeakonlytoourselves.Ofcourse,
relationships are created largely by
meansofwords.Thisisenoughonthe
topicofspeechtoillustratethewaythis
commandment builds on and protects
a particular dimension of the created
moral order. Or maybe we should say
thecommandmentrequiresustogothe
right direction within a created structure.
Asecondillustrationusingadifferent
commandmentmaybeinorder.Weare
told in the first commandment, „You
shall have no other gods before me.“
Of course, this commandment confrontsidolatry,whichiscommon.This
commandmentisnecessarybecauseof
at least two dimensions of the created
moralorder.First,peopleareincurably
religious. Even if people do not worshipthetrueGod,theycanhardlystop
themselvesfromlookingsomewherefor
8
theirhope,comfort,andmeaning.And
as soon as people turn somewhere for
hopeandcomfort,theyturnsomething
created,somecreatedgood,intoagodsubstitute,hopingthisidolwillprovide
what they need. This dimension of
human life moved the atheist philosopherLudwigFeuerbachtosaythatthe
main difference between humans and
animals is that people are religious.
Idolatrywouldnotbepossibleasasin
if people were not created as religious
beings.Thisfirstcommandmentbuilds
on and directs this dimension of the
createdmoralorder.
The first commandment also builds
on and directs a second dimension of
thecreatedmoralorder.Thishastodo
withtheroleofreligioninpersonaland
cultural life. False religion, idolatry, is
important not only because it insults
Godbutalsobecausereligionplayssuch
alargeroleinshapingpersonalandculturallife.Ifweworshippersonalpeace
and affluence, our lives will take one
shape; if we worship our Creator and
Redeemer, our lives will take another
shape. The philosopher Paul Tillich
summarized some of the better sociological and anthropological insights
when he said, „Culture is the form of
religion;religionisthesubstanceofculture.“ This observation may not be as
penetratingandcriticalastheOldTestamentassessmentofwhyidolatryisso
dreadful. About idols we read, „Those
whomakethemwillbelikethem,and
so will all who trust in them“. (Psalm
135:18)Thefirstcommandmentbuilds
on a crucial dimension of how God
THEOLOGISCHE AKZENTE
Interpreting the Ten Commandments ...
created human life: Our choice of an
object of worship will play a massive
roleinshapingourpersonalandculturallife.Thisrelationshipbetweenworshipandtheshapeofhumanlifeispart
ofthecreationorder.
Thesecommentsontwoofthecommandmentsmustbeseenasillustrative
ofaprincipleofinterpretation.Eachof
thetenbuildson,protects,anddirects
our actions in relation to a particular
dimension or structure of the created
orderthatisatriskbecauseofsin.The
commandments teach us how to use
the different dimensions of creation
properlyandhowtomoveintheright
directionwithinthevariousstructures
ofcreation.
6 The Ten Commandments
were given to us in a
particular organic order
The Decalogue does not begin with
theprohibitionofadultery,notdoesit
end with the rule against lying. Even
if you have not thought about it, you
probably sense a certain order of presentation.Somereflectiononthisorder
canteachusmuchaboutmorallifeand
experience. The first commandment
addresses the deepest motives of our
hearts, the choice of an object for our
worship.Thiscommandmentseemsto
beinthefirstpositionbecausealloflife
flows from our choice of an object of
worship.Withalittleexaggerationone
mightsaythatourresponsetothefirst
commandmentdecidesourresponseto
MBS TEXTE 34
theothercommandments.Thesecond
andthirdcommandmentsbuildonthe
basic principles of the first commandment,givingalotmoredefinitionand
contenttoourworship,whilealsospeaking to the problems of our worship
becomingmixedwithidolatryorunbalancedfromanimproperviewofGod.
The fourth commandment (Sabbath)
requires that our worship include the
public institutional expression of our
faith.Itisnotonlyaboutadaybutalso
about public worship, which requires
having a time, place, plan, facilities,
andsoon.Itisvaluabletoseethatthe
Sabbathcommandmentstandsbetween
thecommandmentsthatmaybelargely
hidden matters of the heart (the first
three) and the commandments that
addresspublicsocietymatters,suchas
stealing,lying,murder,etc.Thisorder
closely parallels an important characteristic of life: a person’s faith begins
to effectively transform a person’s life
partlybymeansparticipationinpublic
worship with a worshipping community. People can claim to have a deep
faith without that faith having much
effect on their life and habits. Participation in worship, Bible study, prayer,
giving,serving,andwitnessinginareal
communitywithalivingcongregation
turnsahiddenfaithintoatransformed
life.Thefourthcommandmentmakes
ahiddenfaithpublicandequipsapersonforthecommandsthatfollow.
Thefifthcommandment,abouthonoringparents,isinsomewayssimilarto
the Sabbath command. People who
haveintactrelationswiththeirparents
9
Thomas K. Johnson
andwhoalsokeeptheSabbathwillbe
largelyequippedtokeepthefollowing
commandments.Phraseddifferently,it
isbymeansofchurchandfamilythata
realfaithbecomesapowerthatchanges
life and culture. And even those peoplewhodonotshareinthelifeoffaith
inthechurch,butwhodohaveintact
relations with their parents, are much
betterabletokeepthefollowingcommandmentsandhaveahumanelifein
society.Evenwithoutaproperfaith,an
intactfamilyismeansofcommongrace
thathelpskeephumanlifehumane.
Commandments six through nine
aretheprimarysocialcommandments.
Theyareintendedtoprotectlife,marriage, property, and truth. Though
mostsocietieshavesomerulesonthese
topics because these topics are central
to the natural moral law (revealed by
God through creation), these commandmentsremindusthatGodisvery
interestedinthesematters.Ouractions
in all these areas are either glorifying
or dishonoring to God. They are the
majorareasofconcerninthestudyof
appliedethics.
The last commandment says, „You
shall not covet“. As the apostle Paul
discovered(Romans7:7),thisisacommandment that is different from the
previousfour.Wecannoteasilydeceive
ourselves into thinking we have fulfilledit.Allofuscovetinsomewayat
sometime.Butcovetingisnotreallya
specificsinsomuchasadesiretocommitsomeothersinfulaction.Thecommandment says we are not to covet a
neighbor’shouseorwife,referringback
10
to the commandments about stealing
and adultery, in this way illustrating
God‘sexpectationofarightattitudeor
desireinrelationtoallthecommandments. So the last commandment is a
principle of interpreting all the commandments: all the commandments
require not only the right actions but
alsotherightdesiresandintentions.All
thecommandmentsaddresstheattitudesofthehumanheart.
If we encounter the last commandmentproperlyitforcesustoourknees
to confess our sin, and then it drives
usbacktothebeginningoftheDecalogue, to learn that our God is a God
whodeliversfrombondage.Thismeans
thattheorderofthecommandmentsis
notexactlyaline;itismorelikeacircle. Once we have discovered that our
heartsarefilledwithcoveting,thenwe
arereadytoproperlyconsiderthequestionofapurefaith,whichisdemanded
bythefirstthreecommandments.
7 The Ten Commandments
contain a dynamic dialogue
between law and grace
ThroughouttheBibleweareconfrontedbyboththeGospel,asetofpromisesofGod‘sgrace,andtheLaw,which
is a set of commands to obey. For the
lifeoffaithtostayinbalance,wemust
be continually responding to both the
law and the Gospel. Distortions arise
when either is neglected or misconstrued.Whatwemightmissisthewayin
whichtheDecalogueitselfpointstothe
THEOLOGISCHE AKZENTE
Interpreting the Ten Commandments ...
lifeoffaithasadynamicdialoguewith
boththeLawandtheGospel.
Of course the Ten Commandments
are primarily law, the outline of all of
God‘slaw.Wheredoweseethegospel
of grace in the Decalogue? The first
place is the preamble: „I am the Lord
your God who brought you out of
Egypt,outofthelandofslavery“.For
Old Testament believers, the Exodus
outofEgyptwasthegreatactofGod
torescueandsavethem.Intheirfaith,
theExodusplayedaroleverysimilarto
theroleplayedbythedeathandresurrection of Jesus for New Testament
believers.Itwasthekeyhistoricalevent
whichformedabasisfortheirredemption, faith, and identity. As New Testament believers we could almost substitute that says something like, „I am
the Lord your God who sent Jesus to
payforallyoursins.“Ofcoursethissets
theTenCommandmentsintoacontext
or framework of a life of response to
grace,alifeofgratitude.Itwouldbea
bigmistakeforustoneglectreadingthe
preamblewhenwereadtheDecalogue.
A second place we see the dynamic
dialogue between law and gospel is in
the third commandment, „You shall
notmisusethenameoftheLordyour
God“. In parts of the Old Testament,
and especially in the book of Exodus,
the phrase „name of God“ had a very
particularmeaning.ItreferredtoaproperrecognitionofbothGod‘sholiness
andwrath,ontheonehand,butalsohis
graceandmercy,ontheotherhand.In
Exodus34:6&7Godproclaimedhis
ownnametoMosessaying,„TheLord,
MBS TEXTE 34
the Lord, the compassionate and graciousGod,slowtoanger,aboundingin
loveandfaithfulness,maintaininglove
tothousands,andforgivingwickedness,
rebellion,andsin.Yethedoesnotleave
theguiltyunpunished;hepunishesthe
children and their children for the sin
of the fathers to the third and fourth
generation“. This description of God
explains what his „name“ means: the
carefully balanced understanding of
bothGod‘sgraceandhiswrathonsin.
InthisbalanceddescriptionofGodwe
seethebasisforboththepromiseofforgivenessinthegospelandthedemand
forobediencetohislaw.Tonotmisuse
thenameofGod,tospeakofhimproperly,requireswethatkeepbothhislaw
andhisgospel,hiswrathandhisgrace
inview.
Afinalwayweseethedialoguebetweenlawandgospelisinthelastcommandment.WhenGodsays,„Youshall
notcovet“,allwecandoisfalltoour
kneesandsay,„Godbemercifultome,a
sinner“.Ifwearehonestwithourselves,
God‘s law will drive us to seek God‘s
graceandforgivenessonceagain.
8 Reflections
God‘s law will probably always be
controversial among fallen men and
women.PeopleloveorhateGod‘scommands, and maybe both at the same
time. This complex reaction is to be
expected because the law both confrontsoursinfulnessandalsoguidesus
in the direction of living consistently
11
Thomas K. Johnson
with how God created us to live. In
themidstofthesestrongfeelings,and
maybe to overcome these strong feelings,itisimportanttotrytointerpret
thecommandmentscarefully.Itisprobablywisetoalwaysemphasizethatthe
lawisnotthegospelandisnottheway
toearnsalvation,sincemistakesonthis
topicaresocommonandsoserious.It
isprobablyalsowisetoemphasizethat
the commandments fit so closely with
the general revelation of the natural
moral law and with the created moral
order.Thishelpsovercomethemisunderstanding that sees God‘s law as
arbitraryordestructiveofhumanwell
being.Theseinsightsmayhelpuslearn
toloveGod‘slaw.
Further reading:
There are two truly classical studiesinthespecialhermeneuticsofthe
Decalogue that theological students
willsurelywanttoread.TheyareJohn
Calvin,InstitutesoftheChristianReligion,BookII,Chapter8,sections1to
12(FinalLatinversionin1559,translated by Ford Lewis Battles, edited by
John T. McNeill, Philadelphia: The
WestminsterPress,1960);andCharles
Hodge, Systematic Theology, Vol. 3,
Chapter19,sections1to3.(Originally
published in 1873. Reprint edition,
Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans,
1986.)AnexcellentoverviewofCalvin
andclassicalReformedtheologyrelated
tothelawisI.JohnHesselink,Calvin‘s
ConceptoftheLaw(AllisonPark,PA:
PickwickPublications,1992).
12
Thedistinctionbetweenlawandgospel was classically developed for evangelicalthoughtbyMartinLuther,especiallyinhisCommentaryonGalatians
of 1536, which is available in various
editions.Theconnectionbetweennatural law and the Decalogue was classicallyarticulatedbyThomasAquinasin
hisTreatiseonLaw,whichisquestions
90–97 of his Summa Theologica, originally published in the 1270‘s, now
availableinvariouseditions.Theviews
ofAquinasweresubstantiallyfollowed
byCalvinandLuther,andcanbearthe
typeoflightimprovementsuggestedby
Albert Wolters in Creation Regained
(Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans,
1985).
The slogan „The War of all against
All“ was probably coined by Thomas
Hobbes and enjoys a prominent place
in his work Leviathan (1651). Good
excerpts from Hobbes are found in
most good anthologies of readings in
ethics and political theory. Ludwig
Feuerbach‘s philosophy of religion
received its most prominent articulation in his Essence of Christianity
(1841),selectionsofwhicharefoundin
many good anthologies on the history
ofphilosophy.TheTillichquotationis
from „Aspects of a Religious Analysis
ofCulture,“inTheologyofCulture,by
Paul Tillich (Oxford University Press,
1959).
THEOLOGISCHE AKZENTE
Interpreting the Ten Commandments ...
The
Author
Über den
Autor
Thomas K. Johnson, M.Div. ACPE, Ph.D. serves Martin
Bucer Seminary as Professor of Apologetics and Dean
of Czech Programs. He is also Director of Komensky
Institute of Prague and teaches philosophy at Charles
University. He is a pastor of the Presbyterian Church
in America and his work is largely sponsored through
the International Institute for Christian Studies. Johnson
served as a Visiting Professor of Philosophy and Psychology at the dissident European Humanities University (1994–96)in totalitarian Minsk, Belarus. He also taught evangelical theology in the orthodox
theological faculty of EHU. (EHU was later closed by force at the orders
of the dictator.) He has been a church planter in the US (Hope Evangelical
Church, Iowa) and a pastor in the former Soviet Union. He has taught in
nine universities or theological schools in five countries.
MBS TEXTE 34
13
Studienzentrum Bonn
Martin Bucer Seminar, Friedrichstr. 38, 53111 Bonn
E-Mail: bonn@bucer.de
Studienzentrum Chemnitz:
Martin Bucer Seminar, Mittelbacher Str. 6, 09224 Chemnitz
E-Mail: chemnitz@bucer.de
Studienzentrum Hamburg
Martin Bucer Seminar, c/o ARCHE,
Doerriesweg 7, 22525 Hamburg
E-Mail: hamburg@bucer.de
Studienzentrum Pforzheim
Martin Bucer Seminar, Bleichstraße 59, 75173 Pforzheim
E-Mail: pforzheim@bucer.de
Website: www.bucer.de
E-Mail: info@bucer.de
Studycenters outside Germany:
Studienzentrum Ankara: ankara@bucer.de
Studienzentrum Innsbruck: innsbruck@bucer.de
Studienzentrum Prag: prag@bucer.de
Studienzentrum Zlin: zlin@bucer.de
Studienzentrum Zürich: zuerich@bucer.de
Martin Bucer Seminary is no university according to German
law, but just offers courses and lists all courses in a inal diploma. Whiteield Theological Seminary (Florida, USA) and
other schools outside of Europe accept thoses courses under their own legal responsibility for granting their degrees
to students. Much of the teaching is by means of Saturday
seminars, evening courses, extension courses, independent
study, and internships.
The work of the seminary is largely supported by the contributions of donors. North American supporters may send
contributions to our American partner organization, The
International Institute for Christian Studies. Checks should
be made out to IICS, with a note mentioning MBS and sent
to:
The International Institute
for Christian Studies:
P.O. Box 12147, Overland Park, KS 66282-2147, USA
EU:
IBAN DE52 3701 0050 0244 3705 07
BIC PBNKDEFF
ART
I
M
12
Studienzentrum Berlin
Martin Bucer Seminar, Breite Straße 39B, 13187 Berlin
E-Mail: berlin@bucer.de
EPH 4 :
Ankara • Innsbruck • Prag • Zlin • Zürich
BUCER
IN
SEM A
Berlin • Bonn • Chemnitz • Hamburg • Pforzheim
N
R
Martin Bucer Seminar
Publisher:
Thomas Schirrmacher, Prof. Dr. phil.
Dr. theol. DD.
Editor:
Ron Kubsch, M.Th.
Editorial Committee:
Thomas Kinker, Th.D., Titus Vogt
Contact:
mbsmaterialien@bucer.de
www.bucer.de
MBS-TexTe (MBS-TexTS)
Theologische Akzente
(Theological Accents)
Es erscheinen außerdem
folgende Reihen:
(The following series of MBS
Texts are also being published:)
Reformiertes Forum
(Reformed Forum)
Pro Mundis
Geistliche Impulse
(Spiritual Impulses)
Hope for Europe
Ergänzungen zur Ethik
(Ethics)
Philosophische Anstöße
(Philosophical Initiatives)
Vorarbeiten zur Dogmatik
(Preliminaries for a Systematic
Theology)