PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS
Prenat Diagn 2010; 30: 719–726.
Published online 27 May 2010 in Wiley InterScience
(www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI: 10.1002/pd.2536
REVIEW
Selective intrauterine growth restriction in monochorionic
diamniotic twin pregnancies
Dan V. Valsky1,2,3 , Elisenda Eixarch1,2 , Josep Maria Martinez1 and Eduard Gratacós1,2 *
1
Department of Maternal-Fetal Medicine (Institut Clı́nic de Ginecologia, Obstetrı́cia i Neonatologia), Hospital Clinic-IDIBAPS,
University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
2
Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Raras (CIBER-ER), Barcelona, Spain
3
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Centers, Mt Scopus, Jerusalem, Israel
Selective intrauterine growth restriction (sIUGR) occurs in 10 to 15% of monochorionic (MC) twins, and
it is associated with a substantial increase in perinatal mortality and morbidity. Clinical evolution is largely
influenced by the existence of intertwin placental anastomoses: pregnancies with similar degrees of fetal
weight discordance are associated with remarkable differences in clinical behavior and outcome. We have
proposed a classification of sIUGR into three types according to umbilical artery (UA) Doppler findings (Inormal, II-absent/reverse end-diastolic flow, III-intermittent absent/reverse end-diastolic flow), which correlates
with distinct clinical behavior, placental features and may assist in counseling and management. In terms of
prognosis, sIUGR can roughly be divided in two groups: type I cases, with a fairly good outcome, and types
II and III, with a substantial risk for a poor outcome. Management of types II and III may consist in expectant
management until deterioration of the IUGR fetus is observed, with the option of cord occlusion if this occurs
before viability. Alternatively, active management can be considered electively, including cord occlusion or
laser coagulation. Both therapies seem to increase the chances of intact survival of the larger fetus, while they
entail, or increase the chances of, intrauterine demise of the IUGR fetus. Copyright 2010 John Wiley &
Sons, Ltd.
KEY WORDS:
selective intrauterine growth restriction; monochorionic twins; arterio-arterial anastomosis; Doppler
INTRODUCTION
The term selective intrauterine growth restriction
(sIUGR) in monochorionic (MC) twin pregnancies is
used to define cases with an estimated fetal weight
(EFW) of less than the 10th percentile in one fetus. Intertwin EFW discordance above 25%, calculated as [(larger
twin—smaller twin)/larger twin], is a common element
accompanying this condition. Although various diagnostic criteria have been used in the literature, including
EFW (Sebire et al., 1997; Gratacos et al., 2004a) or fetal
weight discordance (Sebire et al., 1997; Victoria and
Mora Gand Arias, 2001; Gratacos et al., 2004a; Vanderheyden et al., 2005), the above definition is widely
accepted and seems to be the simplest for practical and
investigational purposes. The clinical significance of MC
pregnancies with both twins having an EFW of less than
the 10th percentile, but without intertwin discordance,
or those with intertwin discordance but a smaller fetus
above the 10th percentile remains to be established.
The rate of sIUGR has been reported to be 10 to
15% (Sebire et al., 1997; Lewi et al., 2008) in MC
twin pregnancies. This condition represents an important contributor to perinatal mortality and morbidity in
MC twins, and it is associated with a high risk of
*Correspondence to: Eduard Gratacós, Department of MaternalFetal Medicine (ICGON), Hospital Clinic, Sabino de Arana 1,
08028, Barcelona, Spain. E-mail: gratacos@clinic.ub.es
Copyright 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
neurological damage in both fetuses (Gratacos et al.,
2004a; Ishii et al., 2009). The introduction of detailed
ultrasonographic and Doppler evaluation and the development of fetoscopic techniques and placental studies
have contributed to increasing our understanding, and
the diagnostic and therapeutic capabilities in this condition. This review will summarize the unique aspects
of the pathophysiology of sIUGR in MC twins and
its implications for the diagnosis and clinical presentation. Likewise, a classification system to differentiate
the main clinical forms will be discussed together with
some considerations on management.
UNIQUE ASPECTS OF sIUGR IN MC TWINS
The main cause for the development of sIUGR in MC
twins is the existence of unequal placental sharing.
The relationship between unequal placental territory and
birth weight discordance has recently been clearly shown
in several studies (Denbow et al., 2000; Fick et al.,
2006; Lewi et al., 2007; Hack et al., 2008). The presence
of very eccentric or velamentous cord insertion in the
smaller twin, reported to be as high as 45%, is a characteristic accompanying finding of sIUGR (Machin, 1997;
Hanley et al., 2002), which has been proposed to partially contribute to this condition. However, whether it is
a cause or the consequence of the extremely asymmetric
distribution of placental territories remains unclear.
Received: 28 December 2009
Revised: 4 March 2010
Accepted: 20 March 2010
Published online: 27 May 2010
720
D. V. VALSKY et al.
Aside from placental asymmetry, the incidence and
natural history of sIUGR in MC twins is different from
those in singletons and dichorionic twins due to the presence of intertwin placental anastomoses (Lewi et al.,
2007). Inter-fetal vascular connections, either arteriovenous (AV) (in reality a vascular aterio-venous connection but not a real anastomosis) or arterio-arterial (AA)
and veno-venous (VV) (direct vascular connections and
therefore real anastomoses) have a strong influence in
the evolution of the sIUGR, as they interfere in the relation between placental territory discordance and birth
weight discordance, which in the absence of anastomoses should be roughly linear. There seems to be a
relative relation between the relative placental area and
the anastomotic pattern (Lewi et al., 2007). Intertwin
anastomotic area, net arterio-venous transfusion and the
diameter of AA anastomoses have been shown to be
correlated with the degree of intertwin placental discordance. Thus, in general, larger degrees of placental
discordance are associated with more intertwin anastomoses, which results in a more pronounced dependency
of the smaller twin on the circulation of its co-twin.
While this may clearly be protective to the smaller twin,
it may entail additional risks to both fetuses, as discussed later in this review. In addition, the above relation
between placental discrepancy and inter-fetal anastomoses is not always present, and therefore it is possible
to observe cases with large placental discordance but a
small number of anastomoses.
In clinical practice, the balance between placental territory and anastomotic pattern will finally determine the
magnitude and the degree of (normally, beneficial) interference with the natural history of growth restriction.
The potential resulting combinations are obviously multiple, but a simplification could be made in three major
scenarios. The first two represent the opposite ends of
a spectrum. At one end, there is little placental discordance and/or large arterio-venous flow interchange. At
the other end is severe placental discordance with little
arterio-venous interchange, which as discussed above is
a rare but possible combination. The first end is associated with a benign clinical evolution. As we approach the
other end, with smaller placental territories and reduced
intertwin vascular connections, the likelihood for a poor
outcome will increase. Indeed, in the presence of very
small intertwin flow interchange, the IUGR fetus tends to
behave like a dichorionic twin, where placental territory
is the major determinant of IUGR. The third scenario
represents a particular situation where the major distinctive feature is the presence of a large AA anastomosis.
This type of vessels allows transfer of large amounts
of blood. It is relatively common that these cases have
larger placental area discrepancies, but in spite of this,
the degree of inter-fetal weight difference is relatively
lower due to shunting of large amounts of blood from the
larger to the smaller twin through the large AA vessel.
As a trade-off, the presence of a large AA anastomosis
creates an unstable hemodynamic system and a higher
risk of acute feto-fetal transfusion episodes in the event
of fetal death or sustained bradycardia of the smaller
twin (Gratacos et al., 2004a, 2007; Ishii et al., 2009). It
is tempting to postulate that MC twins with large AA
Copyright 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
vessels and very small placental territory might represent
the last step in the spectrum of placental discordance
in which viability of a normal fetus is preserved, with
the next step being the acardiac twin with TRAP (twin
reverse arterial perfusion) sequence (Figure 1).
IMPLICATIONS OF THE MONOCHORIONIC
PLACENTAL FEATURES IN DOPPLER
FETOPLACENTAL EXAMINATION
In singleton pregnancies complicated by early IUGR, the
reduction in placental vascular bed occurring in placental
insufficiency is normally reflected in the umbilical artery
(UA) Doppler waveforms. Changes in UA pulsatility are
interpreted as a surrogate parameter of increased vascular resistance in the placental bed, and such changes
are consequently associated with a relatively predictable
deterioration in the UA flow characterized by progressive reduction in diastolic flow and eventually absent and
reverse diastolic velocities. This is accompanied from
early stages by changes in middle cerebral artery (MCA)
pulsatility indicating redistribution of blood flow to the
brain, and in advanced stages, by increased pulsatility
in venous flow parameters, which correlate with the
establishment of subclinical cardiac function as a consequence of fetal hypoxia and finally acidosis (Sebire,
2003; Baschat, 2004; Turan et al., 2008).
For the above-discussed reasons, the clinical interpretation of UA Doppler changes cannot be made on
the same grounds as for singleton pregnancies (Hecher
et al., 1994; Gaziano et al., 1998; Wee et al., 2003;
Gratacos et al., 2004b). The combination of inadequate
placental sharing with the presence of inter-fetal anatomoses will determine three major types of Doppler
Figure 1—Monochorionic placenta in a type III sIUGR. The dotted
white line indicates the vascular equator. Note the small placental
area of the IUGR fetus, which is connected to the larger one through
a large AA (red arrows), which connects directly the umbilical cords
and allows transfer of large amounts of blood to the smaller fetus.
While the ratio of the larger to smaller placental territory was 3.5 to 1,
the ratio in fetal weights was to 1.75 (1750 and 1010 g, respectively).
This difference illustrates the influence of the monochorionic placenta
in the natural history of growth restriction. Placenta perfused with dye
courtesy of Dr Maria Angeles Gomez, Buenos Aires
Prenat Diagn 2010; 30: 719–726.
DOI: 10.1002/pd
sIUGR IN MONOCHORIONIC DIAMNIOTIC TWIN PREGNANCIES
(a)
(b)
721
characteristic cyclic UA flow pattern is associated with
the co-existence of sIUGR, thus of significant fetal
weight discordance and a large diameter of the AA anastomosis (Taylor et al., 2003; Wee et al., 2003).
The classification into types was proposed because
each of these Doppler patterns (Gratacos et al., 2004a)
appears normally from very early stages of pregnancy,
and in the vast majority of cases, it remains unchanged
until delivery, and (Sebire et al., 1997) it is associated
with a distinct clinical course with respect to the
other types (Wee et al., 2003; Gratacos et al., 2004b;
Vanderheyden et al., 2005; Ishii et al., 2009). Thus, the
UA Doppler pattern observed at the time the diagnosis of
sIUGR is established can be used to predict the likely
clinical evolution, and this has important implications
for counseling and management.
CLINICAL EVOLUTION AND PERINATAL
OUTCOME OF sIUGR IN MC TWINS ACCORDING
TO THE TYPE OF UA DOPPLER PATTERN
Type I
Figure 2—Pulsed Doppler showing intermittent absent or reverse
end-diastolic flow (iAREDF) in the UA of the smaller fetus (a). In
most, but not all, cases, the systolic waveforms have a characteristic
oscillation reflecting the influence of the transmitted waveforms on
the peak velocity. The pattern of iAREDF could be more or less
prominent in each case and must be actively searched for as it can
be easily missed and classified as either type I or II Doppler. The
sign is more easily observed at the placental cord insertion during
maternal breath holding and using a low sweep speed of the spectral
Doppler, which helps to identify not only the diastolic changes but
also the characteristic oscillation of the systolic peak velocities. These
changes are the reflection in the smaller fetus’ cord of the characteristic
periodic bidirectional pattern of AA anastomosis (b), which results
from the collision of two opposite systolic waveforms
waveform in the IUGR twin. We have proposed to classify these patterns into types: type I with positive diastolic flow, type II with persistently absent or reverse,
and type III with intermittent absent or reverse enddiastolic flow (iAREDF). The type III Doppler pattern
is unique to MC twins, and it is characterized by the
presence of cyclic or intermittent absence or reverse of
diastolic wave, which in reality is a transmitted pattern
reflecting the existence of a large placental AA anastomosis (Hecher et al., 1994; Wee et al., 2003) (Figure 2).
It must be stressed that this inference does not work
in the opposite direction, and therefore the presence of
AA anastomoses in an MC pregnancy does not entail
that iAREDF will be observed. The appearance of the
Copyright 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
IUGR twins with present diastolic flow have been shown
to generally have a favorable outcome. In a prospective
study, a group of 39 type I twin pairs had a later gestational age at diagnosis (mean 23 weeks), later gestational
age at time (mean 35.4 weeks), higher birth weight
and lower intertwin discordance rate (29%) than those
observed for type II or III sIUGR pregnancies (Gratacos et al., 2007). The rate of intrauterine fetal death
(IUFD) was less than 3%, and the rate of parenchymal brain damage in surviving twins was 0%. These
results are in agreement with another collaborative study
(Ishii et al., 2009), where the outcome of 63 cases with
sIUGR without signs of twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) was evaluated. Perinatal outcomes for
type I sIUGR were, in general, much better than those
observed in the other types, with an intact survival rate
in both twins over 90%, an average gestational age at
delivery of 36 weeks and a 4.3% rate of IUFD in the
smaller twin. Placental studies have shown that each UA
Doppler type in MC twins with sIUGR is roughly associated with one of the three placental patterns discussed
in the preceding section. Type I Doppler is observed in
pregnancies belonging to the good prognosis end of the
spectrum as defined above, with a less marked degrees of
intertwin placental discordance and/or a sufficient anastomotic area to support the smaller fetus.
Type II
Observation of AREDF in the IUGR twin is associated with early fetal deterioration in the majority of
cases. Even if the average latency time from diagnosis of AREDF to delivery is much longer as compared
with that reported for singleton pregnancies, 54 versus 11 days, respectively (Vanderheyden et al., 2005),
either the placental insufficiency is particularly severe
or the intertwin blood flow interchange cannot fully
Prenat Diagn 2010; 30: 719–726.
DOI: 10.1002/pd
722
D. V. VALSKY et al.
compensate the placental discordance, and thus from a
certain gestational age, fetal deterioration is observed.
In a small proportion of fetuses, prolonged survival of
the growth restricted fetus until 32 weeks or later has
been observed, but this is an exception. Analysis of the
placental patterns in type II pregnancies (Taylor et al.,
2000) showed that these are normally associated with
smaller placental territories in the IUGR twin and/or
with a relatively smaller number of anastomoses.
In the series published by Gratacos et al., in 30
type II patients (persistent AREDF in UA of IUGR
twin) (Gratacos et al., 2007), the degree of placental
discordance was high (38%) and the deterioration of
the IUGR twin, as defined by abnormal venous Doppler
flow or biophysical profile (BPP), was observed in 90%,
with a mean gestational age at delivery of 30 weeks. It
should be noted that the rate of neonatal brain damage
according to ultrasound scans was 14.4% in the smaller
twin. In spite of the large proportion of cases presenting
with signs of fetal deterioration, there were no cases
of unexpected IUFD in this group, which reflects that
deterioration follows a relatively predictable evolution
in most instances. Brain damage of the normally grown
twin was a rare event in this series (1/30).
In the study of Ishii et al. (2009), type II patients had
the worst prognosis among the three study groups. An
important difference of this study with respect to the
previous one was that in Ishii’s series, selective feticide
was not a management option due to legal constraints.
Thus, cases presenting with fetal deterioration had to
be managed either expectantly or by elective delivery.
Accordingly, gestational age at delivery was shorter,
28 weeks, and intact survival of the smaller twin was
only 37.0%, with a perinatal death rate close to 50%. The
larger rate of preterm elective deliveries and IUFD had a
clear impact on the outcome of the normally grown twin,
which showed an intact survival of only 55%. These data
are important, because they support the notion that type
II cases have in reality the poorest outlook among all MC
twins with sIUGR; however, this may not be apparent
to clinicians if fetal cord occlusion is offered among the
therapy options.
Previous studies have reported the outcome of MC
pregnancies with sIUGR and UA Doppler findings
consistent with type II as defined in this review. In
a study by Quintero et al. (2001), the outcome of 17
patients with sIUGR and absent or reverse UA Doppler
managed conservatively was compared with that of 11
patients with the same Doppler changes and treated by
laser coagulation of placental anastomoses. There were
no differences in gestational age at delivery and the rate
of at least one survival between the groups. The rate of
IUFD was 41% in the conservatively treated group, with
42% of these cases complicated with concomitant death
of the co-twin. The rate of severe neurological handicap
was 13.6% (3/22) in newborns managed expectantly and
0% (0/12) when patients were managed by laser ablation,
but the difference did not reach statistical significance. In
a study by Huber et al. (2006) the natural history of MC
twin pregnancies with discordant amniotic fluid volume
and no signs of TTTS was analyzed. Nineteen of the
pregnancies included in the study had signs consistent
Copyright 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
with sIUGR in combination with AREDF in the UA,
and could therefore be regarded as type II sIUGR. The
overall survival rate was 60%, survival of both fetuses
was observed in 47% and median gestational age at
delivery was 32 weeks.
Type III
Type III pregnancies represent a distinct situation with
respect to the other types, as clinical evolution is much
less predictable.
In the series published by Gratacos et al. (2007),
the average fetal weight discordance was 36%, and
the mean gestational age at delivery was 32 weeks.
The rate of deterioration of the IUGR fetus was low
(10.8%), but in spite of this apparently benign evolution,
unexpected IUFD of the smaller twin occurred in 15.4%
of cases, which was associated with the death of the
co-twin in one-third of cases, leading to intrauterine
death of the larger fetus in 6.2% of cases. The rate
of neonatal brain injury in the larger twin was 19.7%,
and most cases of brain injury occurred in cases with
double twin survivors (10 of 12 cases). This atypical
clinical evolution in pregnancies with type III sIUGR is
thought to reflect the instable hemodynamic situation
created by the presence of a large AA anastomosis.
On the one hand, the magnitude of the intertwin blood
exchange allows that the normal twin supports survival
of the smaller one. This occurs at the expense of the
creation of a hyperdynamic circulation in the larger twin,
similar to what is found in monochorionics with an
acardiac fetus or large fetal tumors, and it is reflected
in the relatively common prevalence of hypertrophic
cardiomyopathy-like (HCL) changes (Muñoz-Abellana
et al., 2007). However, the existence of a high flow
interchange through a large vessel leads to massive fetofetal transfusion episodes in the event of a sudden drop
in fetal blood pressure or, more commonly, heart rate.
The existence of such episodes has been documented
(Gratacos et al., 2004a) (Figure 3), and it is proposed to
be one of the main factors to explain the occurrence of
unexpected fetal death of the IUGR and of brain injury
in the normal twin, if both fetuses are born alive.
In another prospective study, where the outcome of
42 MC twin pregnancies with sIUGR was compared
with 32 MC uncomplicated pregnancies, Gratacos et al.
(2004a) reported a significantly higher risk of IUFD
(10.7 vs 0%) in pregnancies with sIUGR, mostly in the
smaller twin (14.2%), and a significantly higher rate of
parenchymal brain damage in the larger twin (20.5 vs
2.8% in the smaller twin). When the pregnancies with
sIUGR were divided into two subgroups, depending on
the UA flow of the smaller twin (with and without
iAREDF), it was clearly shown that all cases of IUFD
and most cases of parenchymal brain damage were
associated with intermittent pattern of flow in UA.
In type III cases reported in Japanese patients (Ishii
et al., 2009) in accordance with previous studies, gestational age at delivery was 31 weeks, with 15.4% of
smaller twin presenting with IUFD, and up to 38.5%
of surviving larger twins showing brain damage at
Prenat Diagn 2010; 30: 719–726.
DOI: 10.1002/pd
sIUGR IN MONOCHORIONIC DIAMNIOTIC TWIN PREGNANCIES
723
common to observe oscillations in the pulsatility index
(PI) week by week. In most of the type I pregnancies,
the sIUGR fetus will persist with a normal Doppler until
advanced stages of pregnancy, allowing elective delivery
at around 34 to 35 weeks.
Type II
Figure 3—Pulsed Doppler of the umbilical artery of the smaller twin
during fetal bradycardia in a case of sIUGR type III, showing transient
acute feto-fetal transfusion through the large AA anastomosis. Note
the bidirectional blood flow; the retrograde systolic waveforms from
the larger twin are periodically interrupted by forward systolic
waveforms from the bradycardic smaller fetus. The existence of such
episodes is proposed to be one of the mechanisms to explain the
occurrence of unexpected fetal death of the IUGR and of brain injury
in the AGA twin, if both fetuses are born alive
6 months of age. While the two studies are not directly
comparable, as the time point to establish the presence
of brain damage was different, the findings are consistent in pointing at an increased risk of brain injury in
the normally grown twin.
Concerning placental features, and as discussed above,
the observation of iAREDF indicates by definition the
presence of a large placental AA anastomosis (Taylor
et al., 2000; Wee et al., 2003; Gratacos et al., 2004a,
2004b; Vanderheyden et al., 2005) and, normally, a
much smaller placental territory in the smaller fetus.
PROPOSED MANAGEMENT STRATEGY
OF sIUGR IN MC TWINS
Systematic follow-up of fetal growth to rule out significant EFW discordance should be a part of the routine
assessment of MC twins from very early stages of pregnancy. As discussed above, both the presence of sIUGR
and the type of UA flow can be determined from the
early second trimester in most instances. As this pattern
is not likely to change in a majority of cases, management schemes and parents’ counseling can be adjusted
accordingly.
Type I
The evolution will be benign in most instances and therefore a policy of close follow-up to rule out evolution of
UA Doppler to a different pattern, which is rare, seems
reasonable. In the absence of such progression, expectant
management with 1 to 2 weeks scans can be adjusted
according to the magnitude of fetal weight discordance
and the existence of increased pulsatility in the UA,
which could be seen occasionally. It must be stressed
that only the existence of AREDF has been consistently
associated with poor outcome, and that it is relatively
Copyright 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
The natural history of sIUGR with severe abnormalities
in the UA Doppler in the form of persistent AREDF
is very poor, and represents a serious challenge to the
normal fetus due to the risk of IUFD of the IUGR
and of the high chances of a very premature delivery.
In general, the deterioration of the IUGR fetus can be
anticipated to allow elective delivery but preterm birth,
normally below 32 weeks, is an inevitable complication
in most of these pregnancies.
Expectant managed in these pregnancies will normally result in fetal hemodynamic deterioration before
32 weeks, with only rare cases progressing uneventfully
to later gestational ages (Gratacos et al., 2004a, 2007;
Ishii et al., 2009). Prediction of the precise timing of
such deterioration in each individual case would be critical to establish the follow-up and management strategy.
Prognostic factors for the timing of deterioration of type
II sIUGR cases have not been formally investigated.
Clinical experience, supported by biological plausibility, suggests that cases with earlier diagnosis, higher
degree of discordance and more pronounced changes in
the UA Doppler will probably deteriorate earlier and
more rapidly. Thus, it seems logical to expect that a
case diagnosed late in the second trimester with a 30%
fetal weight discordance and absent diastolic wave in the
UA will typically have better prognosis and deteriorate
later than a case diagnosed in early second trimester with
50% discordance and reversed UA diastolic flow. While
this may help some parents in deciding the management strategy, close fetal monitoring is mandatory in any
event. The appearance of absent or reverse atrial flow
in the ductus venosus (DV) allowed to identify severe
deterioration and identify cases at risk for fetal death in
prospective series (Gratacos et al., 2004a, 2007), allowing active management—that is delivery or fetal therapy—before the occurrence of intrauterine death in all
reported cases.
Thus, if the diagnosis of type II sIUGR is done in
early stages of pregnancy, parents must be informed of
the expected outcome according to published experience,
and a decision should be made between expectant or
active management, as cord occlusion or placental laser
coagulation (see discussion on therapy options later in
this review). In the cases managed expectantly, a weekly
follow-up scheme is chosen, if venous Doppler is normal, with more frequent scans when PI of DV becomes
elevated above the two standard deviations seems reasonable. BPP should be included in the follow-up protocol on later stages of pregnancy. When expectant management is chosen, and where late cord occlusion is
legally possible, a second important decision is to define
the cut-off for a decision between an elective delivery
or fetal cord occlusion. For most parents and physicians,
Prenat Diagn 2010; 30: 719–726.
DOI: 10.1002/pd
724
D. V. VALSKY et al.
a limit of 28 weeks would seem reasonable, but this
might be moved to 26 or 30 weeks according to parents’
wishes.
Type III
For type III pregnancies, management represents a
challenge. As opposed to type II, in a majority of cases,
the IUGR fetus will remain stable allowing delivery
at around 32 to 34 weeks, although an increased risk
of sudden fetal death of the IUGR fetus and brain
injury in the normally grown twin is to be expected.
Again, predictive factors for a poor outcome are not well
established. Clearly, an early diagnosis of sIUGR, with
a high degree of discordance, prominent intermittent
reverse flow in the smaller twin, and short distance
between placental cord insertions are high-risk factors.
When all these factors are present, the chances for a poor
outcome are likely to be high and the option of elective
fetal therapy might be discussed with parents. However,
while these risk factors might be taken into account and
help to offer rough estimates about the prognosis for
each specific case, it is certainly impossible to quantify
a probability of risks on the basis of the available
evidence. When expectant management is decided, it
should follow the same principles as discussed above
for type II cases, with the important difference that in
type III sIUGR, the smaller fetus will seldom present
signs of deterioration in venous Doppler. In the absence
of abnormal venous Doppler or BPP, elective delivery
between 32 and 34 weeks of gestation is probably a
reasonable option in conservatively managed cases.
FETAL THERAPY FOR MC TWINS WITH sIUGR
There are two relevant issues of discussion, firstly, the
indication for fetal therapy and secondly, the type of
procedure to be chosen.
Indications for fetal therapy in sIUGR
It is, and will probably remain, very difficult to establish
criteria for fetal therapy in sIUGR pregnancies. Whatever the available information is, it will be unlikely to
result in an optimal solution because this will always
depend on three issues: (1) the risks of intrauterine
fetal death and/or brain injury, (2) parents’ wishes and
(3) technical considerations. For the above-discussed
reasons, in most cases, only rough estimations of ‘fairly
good’ or ‘rather poor’ prognosis can be made, but the
chances of serious damage or death clearly exist and
it is unquestionable that the presence of abnormal UA
Doppler in MC twins with sIUGR, either in the form of
type II or type III, is a high-risk situation. Certainly, the
individual risk may vary substantially, and it is possible
that any type of active therapy in utero represents more
risks than benefits in certain cases. However, some parents may prefer to face this risk either to maximize the
chances of having a normal baby and/or to avoid the
Copyright 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
uncertainty of expectant management. Finally, technical
issues may also play a role in the decision-making process, as placental location and cord insertions might render some procedures more risky or simply impossible.
Cord occlusion versus placental laser
coagulation
Umbilical cord occlusion for selective feticide has been
extensively reported as an option for complicated or
discordant monochorionic twins (Ilagan et al., 2008;
Rossi et al., 2009). Cord occlusion is a straightforward
treatment, preventing exsanguination of the healthy fetus
into the dead co-twin. The outcome of the technique
has not been evaluated in prospective studies including
exclusively sIUGR cases, but all published series contain
such cases. Thus the chances of survival for the larger
fetus range from 80 to 85%.
If selective feticide is not an acceptable alternative
for parents, or in countries where it is not a legal option
(Ishii et al., 2009; Rossi et al., 2009), laser coagulation
of placental anastomoses may be offered. In a small clinical series (Gratacos et al., 2008), 18 type III sIUGR
cases were treated with laser. Laser coagulation was
reported to be technically difficult and not feasible in
two cases. Placental laser dichorionization resulted in a
66.7% (12/18) rate of IUFD of the smaller twin after
the procedure, a significantly larger proportion than the
19.4% (6/31) of cases managed conservatively during
the same study period. However, the risk of concomitant death of the larger twin was significantly lower [0%
(0/12) vs 50% (3/6), p = 0.02]. The rate of periventricular leucomalacia in the larger twin in the laser group
was lower than in cases managed conservatively [5.9%
(1/17) vs 14.3% (4/28)]. However, the difference did not
reach statistical significance (p = 0.63). As previously
mentioned, laser therapy was evaluated as a treatment
option for type II sIUGR in a study by Quintero et al.
(2001). In this report, both fetuses survived in 4/11
treated pregnancies. Five out of eleven (45%) IUGR
fetuses died after selective laser photocoagulation of
communicating vessels. As discussed above, laser treatment in this group of patients was associated with a high
postoperative fetal death rate in comparison with conservatively managed group. No significant protective effect
in the rate of severe neurological impairment was shown
after laser procedure.
One major drawback of laser is that the technique
may not be feasible in cases where an anterior placenta
is combined with large AA vessels and placental cord
insertions, which are close to each other (Gratacos et al.,
2008). Thus, as discussed above, technical issues may
eventually influence the decision, irrespective of the
severity of the case and parents’ wishes. Therefore,
even in cases of extreme severity and obvious fetal
deterioration, laser may not be an option, and if a
cord occlusion is not acceptable for any of the above
reasons, the case will necessarily have to be managed
expectantly.
In summary, although there are no large series to
counsel parents with accurate figures, in general, both
Prenat Diagn 2010; 30: 719–726.
DOI: 10.1002/pd
725
sIUGR IN MONOCHORIONIC DIAMNIOTIC TWIN PREGNANCIES
cord occlusion and placental laser coagulation seem to
increase the chances of intact survival of the larger fetus,
while they increase the risk of intrauterine demise for the
IUGR fetus.
LATE ONSET sIUGR IN MC TWINS
This review has focused in early sIUGR, characterized
by an early onset and diagnosed around 20 weeks of
gestational age and which seems to be the most common form of sIUGR presenting in MC twins. Recent
clinical series have described the outcome of late onset
sIUGR, diagnosed after 26 weeks (Lewi et al., 2008).
Lewi et al. (2008) compared a group of 13 MC discordant twins with late onset sIUGR with a group of early
onset discordance and uncomplicated MC pregnancies.
Late sIUGR was characterized by an almost concordant
growth until late second trimester, with sIUGR developing progressively from then onward. Intertwin fetal
weight reached on average 30%, and mean gestational
age at delivery was 35 weeks. UA Doppler was normal in all cases and there was one case of IUFD (8%)
in this series. The rate of intertwin hemoglobin discordance, meeting the criteria for twin anemia-polycytemia
sequence, was 38%. Placental studies revealed a relatively low larger to smaller placental ratio of 1.59,
as compared with 2.55 in early onset IUGR pregnancies and 1.38 in controls, and a significantly lower total
anastomotic diameter of 5.83, in comparison with early
onset cases and controls (13.97 and 8.86, respectively),
with a few small, mostly unidirectional, anastomoses.
The pathogenesis of such late discordance is thought to
be the establishment of a chronic unidirectional intertwin blood transfusion toward the larger twin through
small AV anastomoses (Lewi et al., 2008). The practical
implication of such findings is in the use of measurement
of peak systolic velocity of MCA as a part of routine
evaluation in cases with late appearance of sIUGR for
the diagnosis of fetal anemia-polycytemia sequence in
order to plan an optimal timing for elective delivery and
appropriate postpartum neonatal management.
CONCLUSION
There is growing evidence supporting a connection
between a particular placental architecture with different clinical types of discordant growth in monochorionic
twins. While unequal placental sharing appears to be
the main factor in the etiology of early onset sIUGR,
intertwin transfusion imbalance seems to be involved in
late discordant growth. A classification of early sIUGR
into three types according to UA Doppler findings seems
to correlate with specific patterns of placental anatomy,
clinical evolution, and fetal outcome. This classification
may be useful for planning the management strategy.
It should be emphasized that the evidence base for this
field is still relatively small and mainly based on observational studies. Unfortunately, considering the small
number of cases, the variability in clinical presentation
Copyright 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
and the parents’ preferences in relation with the management options, a randomized controlled trial of intervention is unlikely to be undertaken. Ideally, an international
registry could help to establish large numbers of cases
that would help advancing in the knowledge of this field.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
E.E. is supported by a Rio Hortega research fellowship
from the Spanish Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias.
REFERENCES
Baschat AA, Hecher K. 2004. Fetal growth restriction due to placental
disease. Semin Perinatol Feb;28(1): 67–80.
Denbow ML, Cox P, Taylor M, Hammal DM, Fisk NM. 2000.
Placental angioarchitecture in monochorionic twin pregnancies:
relationship to fetal growth, fetofetal transfusion syndrome, and
pregnancy outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol Feb;182(2): 417–426.
Fick AL, Feldstein VA, Norton ME, et al. 2006. Unequal placental
sharing and birth weight discordance in monochorionic diamniotic
twins. Am J Obstet Gynecol 195(1): 178–183.
Gaziano E, Gaziano C, Brandt D. 1998. Doppler velocimetry
determined redistribution of fetal blood flow: correlation with
growth restriction in diamniotic monochorionic and dizygotic twins.
Am J Obstet Gynecol 178(6): 1359–1367.
Gratacos E, Antolin E, Lewi L, et al. 2008. Monochorionic twins
with selective intrauterine growth restriction and intermittent absent
or reversed end-diastolic flow (Type III): feasibility and perinatal
outcome of fetoscopic placental laser coagulation. Ultrasound
Obstet Gynecol 31(6): 669–675.
Gratacos E, Carreras E, Becker J, et al. 2004a. Prevalence of
neurological damage in monochorionic twins with selective
intrauterine growth restriction and intermittent absent or reversed
end-diastolic umbilical artery flow. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
24(2): 159–163.
Gratacos E, Lewi L, Carreras E, et al. 2004b. Incidence and
characteristics of umbilical artery intermittent absent and/or
reversed end-diastolic flow in complicated and uncomplicated
monochorionic twin pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 23(5):
456–460.
Gratacos E, Lewi L, Munoz B, et al. 2007. A classification system
for selective intrauterine growth restriction in monochorionic
pregnancies according to umbilical artery Doppler flow in the
smaller twin. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 30(1): 28–34.
Hack KE, Nikkels PG, Koopman-Esseboom C, et al. 2008. Placental
characteristics of monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies in
relation to perinatal outcome. Placenta Nov;29(11): 976–981.
Hanley ML, Ananth CV, Shen-Schwarz S, Smulian JC, Lai YL,
Vintzileos AM. 2002. Placental cord insertion and birth weight
discordancy in twin gestations. Obstet Gynecol Mar;99(3):
477–482.
Hecher K, Jauniaux E, Campbell S, et al. 1994. Artery-to-artery
anastomosis in monochorionic twins. Am J Obstet Gynecol 171(2):
570–572.
Huber A, Diehl W, Zikulnig L, Bregenzer T, Hackelöer BJ, Hecher K.
2006. Perinatal outcome in monochorionic twin pregnancies
complicated by amniotic fluid discordance without severe twintwin transfusion syndrome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Jan;27(1):
48–52.
Ilagan JG, Wilson RD, Bebbington M, et al. 2008. Pregnancy
outcomes following bipolar umbilical cord cauterization for
selective termination in complicated monochorionic multiple
gestations. Fetal Diagn Ther 23: 153–158.
Ishii K, Murakoshi T, Takahashi Y, et al. 2009. Perinatal outcome of
monochorionic twins with selective intrauterine growth restriction
and different types of umbilical artery Doppler under expectant
MANAGEMENT. Fetal Diagn Ther 26(3): 157–161.
Lewi L, Cannie M, Blickstein I, et al. 2007. Placental sharing, birthweight discordance, and vascular anastomoses in monochorionic
Prenat Diagn 2010; 30: 719–726.
DOI: 10.1002/pd
726
D. V. VALSKY et al.
diamniotic twin placentas. Am J Obstet Gynecol Dec;197(6):
587.e1–587.e18.
Lewi L, Gucciardo L, Huber A, et al. 2008. Clinical outcome and
placental characteristics of monochorionic diamniotic twin pairs
with early- and late-onset discordant growth. Am J Obstet Gynecol
Nov;199(5): 511.e1–511.e17.
Lopriore E, Deprest J, Slaghekke F, et al. 2008. Placental characteristics in monochorionic twins with and without twin anemiapolycythemia sequence. Obstet Gynecol Oct;112(4): 753–758.
Machin GA. 1997. Velamentous cord insertion in monochorionic
twin gestation. An added risk factor. J Reprod Med Dec;42(12):
785–789.
Muñoz-Abellana B, Hernandez-Andrade E, Figueroa-Diesel H, et al.
2007. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy-like changes in monochorionic
twin pregnancies with selective intrauterine growth restriction and
intermittent absent/reversed end-diastolic flow in the umbilical
artery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Dec; 30(7): 977–982.
Rossi AC, D’Addario V. 2009. Umbilical cord occlusion for selective
feticide in complicated monochorionic twins: a systematic review
of literature. Am J Obstet Gynecol 200: 123–129.
Sebire NJ. 2003. Umbilical artery Doppler revisited: pathophysiology
of changes in intrauterine growth restriction revealed. Ultrasound
Obstet Gynecol May;21(5): 419–422.
Sebire NJ, Snijders RJ, Hughes K, et al. 1997. The hidden mortality
of monochorionic twin pregnancies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104(10):
1203–1207.
Copyright 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Quintero RA, Bornick PW, Morales WJ, Allen MH. 2001. Selective
photocoagulation of communicating vessels in the treatment of
monochorionic twins with selective growth retardation. Am J Obstet
Gynecol 185: 689–696.
Taylor MJ, Denbow ML, Tanawattanacharoen S, Gannon C, Cox PM,
Fisk NM. 2000. Doppler detection of arterio-arterial anastomoses
in monochorionic twins: feasibility and clinical application. Hum
Reprod Jul;15(7): 1632–1636.
Turan OM, Turan S, Gungor S, et al. 2008. Progression of Doppler
abnormalities in intrauterine growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet
Gynecol Aug;32(2): 160–167.
Victoria A, Mora Gand Arias F. 2001. Perinatal outcome, placental
pathology, and severity of discordance in monochorionic and
dichorionic twins. Obstet Gynecol 97(2): 310–315.
Vanderheyden TM, Fichera A, Pasquini L, et al. 2005. Increased
latency of absent end-diastolic flow in the umbilical artery of
monochorionic twin fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 26(1):
44–49.
Wee LY, Taylor MJ, Vanderheyden T, Talbert D, Fisk NM.
2003. Transmitted arterio-arterial anastomosis waveforms causing
cyclically intermittent absent/reversed end-diastolic umbilical artery
flow in monochorionic twins. Placenta Aug;24(7): 772–778.
Prenat Diagn 2010; 30: 719–726.
DOI: 10.1002/pd