Calabria Bilingualism

Bilingualism: Language and Cognition http://journals.cambridge.org/BIL Additional services for Bilingualism: Language and Cognition: Email alerts: Click here Subscriptions: Click here Commercial reprints: Click here Terms of use : Click here Age-related effects over bilingual language control and executive control MARCO CALABRIA, FRANCESCA M. BRANZI, PAULA MARNE, MIREIA HERNÁNDEZ and ALBERT COSTA Bilingualism: Language and Cognition / FirstView Article / August 2013, pp 1 - 14 DOI: 10.1017/S1366728913000138, Published online: 25 April 2013 Link to this article: http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S1366728913000138 How to cite this article: MARCO CALABRIA, FRANCESCA M. BRANZI, PAULA MARNE, MIREIA HERNÁNDEZ and ALBERT COSTA Age-related effects over bilingual language control and executive control. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, Available on CJO 2013 doi:10.1017/S1366728913000138 Request Permissions : Click here Downloaded from http://journals.cambridge.org/BIL, IP address: 91.240.2.62 on 09 Sep 2013 C Cambridge University Press 2013 doi:10.1017/S1366728913000138 Bilingualism: Language and Cognition: page 1 of 14  Age-related effects over bilingual language control and executive control∗ MARCO CALABRIA Center for Brain and Cognition, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Spain FRANCESCA M. BRANZI Center for Brain and Cognition, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Spain PAU L A M A R N E Center for Brain and Cognition, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Spain MIREIA HERNÁNDEZ Center for Brain and Cognition, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Spain & Cognitive Neuropsychology Laboratory, Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA A L B E RT C O S TA Center for Brain and Cognition, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Spain & Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats, Spain (Received: July 25, 2012; final revision received: March 7, 2013; accepted: March 13, 2013) The aim of the present study is two-fold. First, we investigate age-related changes to bilingual language control (bLC) mechanisms across lifespan. Second, we explore the relation between bLC mechanisms and those of the domain-general executive (EC) system by looking at age effects on these two systems. To do so, we compare the performances of the three age groups of bilinguals (young, middle-aged and elderly) in a language switching task to those of non-linguistic switching task. We found an age-related change in the non-linguistic switch cost but not in the language switch cost. Moreover, we did not find any correlation between the magnitudes of the switch costs. Taken together these results indicate that bLC is not affected by age as the EC system is, and interestingly, we add new evidence that the bLC mechanisms are not fully subsidiary to those of the domain-general EC system. Keywords: bilingualism, aging, executive control, bilingual language control 1. Introduction Language production is the set of processes that allows individuals to translate thoughts into speech. These processes include the selection of a concept to be expressed, the lexical retrieval of the words and their morphological properties, and the planning and the monitoring of the articulatory aspects of the * This work was supported by grants from the Spanish government (PSI2008-01191, PSI2011-23033, Consolider Ingenio 2010 CSD2007-00012, IMSERSO 48/2010) and the Catalan government (Consolidat SGR 2009-1521). Marco Calabria was supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from the Spanish Government (Juan de la Cierva fellowship). Francesca M. Branzi was supported by a predoctoral fellowship from the Spanish Government (FPU-20092013). This research was also supported by a Marie Curie International Outgoing Fellowship within the 7th European Community Framework Programme awarded to Mireia Hernández. We thank three anonymous reviewers for their comments. speech output. Although unimpaired individuals appear to conduct all these processes effortlessly and with high reliability, it requires the participation of executive control (EC) processes (Roelofs & Piai, 2011; Strijkers, Holcomb & Costa, 2011; Ye & Zhou, 2009). Hence, the domain-general EC system is constantly interacting with the language production system to guarantee successful communication. A particular instance in which this interaction becomes very apparent is that of bilingual speech production, since bilingual speakers, beyond mastering all the processes involved in lexicalization, also have to learn how to prevent cross-language interference. That is, bilinguals need not only to select the language in which they want to conduct verbalization (according to the communicative setting), but they also need to avoid the potential interference from the irrelevant language. Furthermore, on some occasions bilinguals have to switch between the two languages according to the given interlocutor. The cognitive processes involved in this ability are usually referred to as bilingual language control Address for correspondence: Albert Costa, Departament de Tecnologies de la Informació i les Comunicacions, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, C/ Tanger, 122-140, 08014-Barcelona, Spain costalbert@gmail.com http://journals.cambridge.org Downloaded: 09 Sep 2013 IP address: 91.240.2.62 2 Marco Calabria, Francesca M. Branzi, Paula Marne, Mireia Hernández and Albert Costa (bLC) (e.g., Abutalebi & Green, 2007; Green, 1986, 1998; Soveri, Rodriguez-Fornells & Laine, 2011). The goal of the present investigation is to explore whether and how bLC is affected by aging. To do so, we compare the performance of three age groups of bilingual speakers (young, middle-aged and elderly) on a typical bLC task called the language switching task. Most of the current evidence regarding bLC comes almost exclusively from studies in which young university students have been tested (Calabria, Hernandez, Branzi & Costa, 2011; Costa & Santesteban, 2004; Costa, Santesteban & Ivanova, 2006; Garbin, Costa, Sanjuan, Forn, Rodriguez-Pujadas, Ventura, Belloch, Hernandez & Ávila, 2011; Hernandez, Dapretto, Mazziotta & Bookheimer, 2001; Hervais-Adelman, Moser-Mercer & Golestani, 2011; Magezi, Khateb, Mouthon, Spierer & Annoni, 2012). To date, the few studies that have investigated the effects of aging on the functioning of the bLC have shown moderate effects. For instance, Gollan, Sandoval and Salmon (2011) showed that the number of cross-language intrusions during verbal fluency tasks increases little with age. Moreover, Weissberger, Wierenga, Bondi and Gollan (2012) showed a complex pattern of switching costs in which some of such costs were affected by aging and others were not. For example, while language mixing costs were relatively unaffected by aging, local-switch costs were affected. Thus, the current evidence is not sufficient to argue in favour of detrimental effects of aging on bLC. Furthermore, there are also reasons to suspect agerelated changes over bLC. First, to the extent that bLC depends on the efficient functioning of the EC system, one might expect that the decline of the EC system associated with aging (Greenwood, 2000; Rhodes, 2004; Tisserand & Jolles, 2003; Verhaeghen & Cerella, 2002; Verhaeghen, Steitz, Sliwinski & Cerella, 2003; Wasylyshyn, Verhaeghen & Sliwinski, 2011) affects the functionality of the bLC system as well. Indeed, some authors have proposed that some of the age-related changes in language production are due to defective functioning of EC mechanisms, such as the weakness of the inhibitory control and/or the reduction of working memory abilities. Second, it has been reported that aging affects a bilingual’s performance in language production tasks. For example, Bialystok, Craik and Luk (2008) reported that bilingual elderly adults compared to young bilinguals have deficits in lexical access when tested in a verbal fluency task. Gollan et al. (2011) also found an increase in cross-language intrusions (e.g., an English word when speaking Spanish) in elderly bilinguals in verbal fluency. These results suggest that there are agerelated changes in bilingual language production that are probably due to a loss in efficiency of bLC. The available evidence for the age effects of bLC comes from language switching studies (Gollan & Ferreira, 2009; http://journals.cambridge.org Downloaded: 09 Sep 2013 Hernandez & Khonert, 1999; Weissberger et al., 2012). A typical example of this task is the following: participants are required to name a series of pictures in different language conditions and the language to use in each trial is cued. There are two kinds of trials: those in which, in a given trial and in the immediately preceding trial, the naming language does not change (repeat trials), and those in which the language changes from one trial to the successive one (switch trials). Participants are slower and less accurate on switch trials than repeat trials, thus the difference in reaction times between these two types of trials is named language switch cost. Two main findings have been reported in this context (Gollan & Ferreira, 2009; Hernandez & Khonert, 1999; Weissberger et al., 2012): (i) elderly bilinguals are overall slower and more error-prone than young bilinguals; (ii) there is an agerelated increase in the magnitude of switch costs. In the present study we further explore the age-related changes on bLC across the lifespan using language switching in Catalan–Spanish bilinguals of three age groups: young, middle-aged and elderly adults. A second goal of this article is to advance our knowledge of how the bLC relates to the domain-general EC system. Although at present few can deny that these two systems interact (for reviews, see Abutalebi & Green, 2007; Hervais-Adelman et al., 2011) we are far from understanding in which way they do so. Perhaps one way to gain more knowledge on this issue is to address whether the performances in linguistic and non-linguistic switching tasks suffer from a similar decline due to aging. To assess this issue, in the present study we also test the three age groups of participants in a non-linguistic switching task, in which bilinguals are cued to judge a series of pictures according to two sorting criteria based on their colour or their shape. Next, we discuss a series of studies that are relevant in this context. In a recent article, Prior and Gollan (2011) assessed the relationship between the EC and bLC by testing bilinguals and monolinguals using a non-linguistic switching task and bilinguals in a language switching task. Interestingly, the group of bilinguals that reported switching languages frequently showed a smaller language switch cost than the group of bilinguals that claimed not to switch languages so frequently. Furthermore, those that switched often showed a smaller switch cost in the non-linguistic task as compared to the monolinguals, suggesting a link between bLC and EC system. Somewhat in contrast with these observations, Calabria et al. (2011) failed to observe a correlation between the magnitude of switch costs observed in language switching and in non-linguistic switching tasks. The results revealed that the two types of switch cost were uncorrelated, suggesting that the bLC mechanisms are not fully subsidiary to those of the domain-general EC system. IP address: 91.240.2.62 Bilingual language control and aging A recent study by Weissberger et al. (2012) has addressed the issue of the cross-talk between the bLC and EC system by studying the performance of elderly bilinguals. Weissberger et al. (2012) observed an agerelated increase in the magnitude of the language switch cost, that is, the magnitude of the switch cost was smaller for younger than elderly bilinguals. Interestingly, however, the performance in the non-linguistic switch task was much less affected by aging, showing significant effects only for error rates. This pattern was interpreted as revealing differential effects of aging on the bLC and EC systems.1 1.1 The present study The aim of the present study is two-fold: first, to further explore to what extent and how bLC is affected by aging, and second, to assess the interaction of the bLC and EC mechanisms across the lifespan. To achieve these goals, sixty Catalan–Spanish highlyproficient bilinguals of three age groups (young, middleaged and elderly) were tested in a language switching task and in a non-linguistic switching task (sorting by colour and shape) (see Calabria et al., 2011). We pay attention to both the quantitative and qualitative aspects of the switch costs. Quantitatively, we assess the presence of correlations between the two tasks in terms of overall speed and in terms of the magnitude of the switch costs, paying special attention to how these magnitudes are affected by aging. The qualitative analysis assesses whether the pattern of switch costs in the two tasks is affected by aging. Here, it is not so much important whether the two tasks elicit the same pattern of switching costs, but rather whether such a pattern is affected by aging in both tasks. The asymmetry of the switch costs is defined as the degree to which the magnitude of the costs to switch between two tasks is similar. One variable that affects switch cost is, for example, the relative difficulty of the two tasks at hand during the experiment (e.g., Calabria et al., 2011; Martin, Barcelo, Hernandez & Costa, 2011). For instance, the switching costs tend to be larger when 1 To some extent, Gollan et al. (2011) reported a similar result by comparing the age-related effects in verbal fluency task and in an EC task (flanker task). Gollan et al. (2011) took the cross-language intrusions as a measure of the defective functioning of the bLC and the magnitude of the conflict effect as a measure of the efficiency of the EC system. Then, the authors correlated the two measures in elderly English–Spanish bilinguals and actually they found a positive correlation. However, the few number of cross-language intrusions (about 1%) experienced by elderly people suggested that language control in bilinguals is not affected with the same severity by aging as the domain-general EC system is. Consequently, this unequal decline of bLC and EC systems led the authors to conclude that the overlapping of bLC and EC mechanisms is to some extent partial. http://journals.cambridge.org Downloaded: 09 Sep 2013 3 switching into the easier task than when switching into the more difficult one (for theoretical explanation see the review by Koch, Gade, Schuch & Philipp, 2010). Similarly, when the task switching involves two languages, low-proficient bilinguals show asymmetrical switch costs (i.e., larger switch-costs when switching into the easier language) which parallel the pattern of the non-linguistic task-switching paradigms. That is, for low-proficient bilinguals switching into the less proficient (and hence, the more difficult task) language (L2) is easier (in terms of RTs and errors) than switching into the more proficient (and hence, the easier task) language (L1) (e.g., Meuter & Allport, 1999). This linguistic asymmetrical switch cost can be explained in the same manner as domaingeneral asymmetrical switching costs. In fact, Meuter and Allport (1999) argued that the magnitude of the inhibition applied to two languages is dependent on the relative strength of the two languages. Therefore, when the less proficient L2 needs to be produced, the more proficient L1 needs to be inhibited more than the other way around. Thus, an asymmetrical switch cost arises because the amount of inhibition that needs to be overcome during the switch into L1 is larger than when switching into L2. However, several studies conducted with highlyproficient bilinguals revealed no asymmetrical language switching costs. That is, when highly-proficient bilinguals are asked to switch between their two proficient languages (hence little difference in difficulty between the two tasks), the switching costs are comparable in both directions (from L1 to L2 and vice versa) (Calabria et al., 2011; Costa & Santesteban, 2004; Costa et al., 2006). Interestingly, this pattern of switching costs in highlyproficient bilinguals is restricted to the linguistic domain. In a previous study, we found symmetrical switching costs for highly-proficient young bilinguals when switching between languages, and asymmetrical switching costs when they switched from colour to shape, that is, in a nonlinguistic switching task (Calabria et al., 2011). What is important in the present context is whether these different patterns of switching costs would vary across the life span. That is, whether the linguistic switching symmetry and the non-linguistic switching asymmetry would be affected by aging. To recapitulate, we examine the issue of the integrity of bLC and its relation with the EC system in several ways. First, we will evaluate the integrity of bLC by looking at the speed of processing, the accuracy and the magnitude of the language switch costs in the three age groups. For instance, a slowing of the reaction times, an increase in errors and the switch costs across groups would indicate age-related changes over bLC. Moreover, we will also look at the qualitative aspect of the language switch cost, such as the symmetry, in the three age groups of bilinguals as an index of the efficiency of bLC functioning. IP address: 91.240.2.62 4 Marco Calabria, Francesca M. Branzi, Paula Marne, Mireia Hernández and Albert Costa Table 1. Participant characteristics for the three age groups. Young Age Education Age of L2 acquisition Middle-aged Elderly Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD 21.8 16.5 1.7 2.2 2.5 2.1 45.7 18.6 1.8 5.1 2.6 2.0 70.5 15.1 1.1 4.0 2.4 1.9 4.0 4.0 3.9 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.6 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 3.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 1.1 4.0 3.9 4.0 3.9 4.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.8 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 4.0 3.7 3.8 3.6 4.0 0.0 0.4 0.3 1.6 0.0 Self-rating Catalan Comprehension Speaking Pronunciation Writing Reading Spanish Comprehension Speaking Pronunciation Writing Reading Second, to explore the relationship between bLC and EC, we will examine: (a) From a quantitative point of view, the magnitude of linguistic and non-linguistic switch costs and any potential correlations between the two switch costs. A similar age-related increase in the switch costs and significant correlations between switch costs in linguistic and non-linguistic switching tasks would suggest similar age-related effects, and to some extent, demonstrate that the bLC mechanisms are fully subsidiary to those of the EC system. (b) From a qualitative point of view, we examine the pattern of switch costs in terms of the symmetry/asymmetry within the linguistic and nonlinguistic switching tasks across three age groups. The presence of similar age-related changes in the pattern of switch costs in both tasks would suggest that the mechanisms of bLC are completely subsidiary to the EC system. 2. Methods 2.1 Participants Sixty bilinguals took part in the experiment. All participants were early and highly-proficient Catalan– Spanish bilinguals with Catalan as L1, having learned Spanish before the age of six. Their proficiency in the two http://journals.cambridge.org Downloaded: 09 Sep 2013 languages was tested by means of a questionnaire at the end of the experiment. Each participant self-rated on a four-point scale the abilities of speaking, pronunciation, comprehension, writing and reading for each language (1 = poor, 2 = regular, 3 = good, 4 = perfect). The whole sample of participants was divided into three age groups, such as: young (n = 20; mean age = 21.8 years, range = 19–27 years), middle-aged (n = 20; mean age = 45.7, range = 38–53), and elderly bilinguals (n = 20, mean age = 70.5, range = 62–77). The characteristics of the three age groups of participants (age, education, age of acquisition of L2, and language proficiency) are reported in the Table 1. 2.2 Materials and procedure The experiment was conducted in a soundproof room. Participants performed the linguistic and non-linguistic versions of the tasks in the same session. The experiments were controlled by the software DMDX (Forster & Forster, 2003), which recorded participants’ vocal and manual responses. Responses were analysed offline and naming latencies were measured from the onset of the word through Checkvocal, a data analysis program for naming tasks in DMDX (Protopapas, 2007). The order of the two tasks was counterbalanced across participants, meaning that half of the participants started with the language switching task and the other half with the non-linguistic switching task. Each experiment started with a practice session of 80 trials. IP address: 91.240.2.62 Bilingual language control and aging Linguistic switching task Eight pictures of objects were selected from Snodgrass and Vanderwart (1980). Half of them referred to cognate words (Spanish/Catalan names: Caracol/Cargol (in English, “snail”); Escoba/Escombra (“broom”); Martillo/Martell (“hammer”); Reloj/Rellotge (“watch”)), and the other half to non-cognate words (Calcetín/Mitjó (“sock”); Manzana/Poma (“apple”); Silla/Cadira (“chair”); Tenedor/Forquilla (“fork”)). Note that in all analyses the two categories were collapsed since there was no difference between cognate and non-cognate words. Participants were required to name the picture in Catalan or in Spanish. A Catalan or Spanish flag, which was presented along with the picture, acted as a cue to indicate in which language subjects had to name the picture. There were two types of trials: (i) those in which participants were required to name the picture in the same language as the preceding trial (repeat trial), and (ii) those in which participants were required to name in the other language with respect to the previous trial (switch trial). There were a total of 320 trials divided in two blocks with 160 trials each. The total distribution of trials was: 128 repeat trials in Catalan, 128 repeat trials in Spanish, 32 switch trials in Catalan and 32 in Spanish. Participants were asked to name the picture as fast as possible and they were informed that the language to be used was to be indicated by a flag, presented on the top of the picture. The pictures were presented in a series of between three and seven trials and at the end of each series an asterisk appeared, and the participants pressed the spacebar to start the next series. At the beginning of each series a word cue was presented for 1000 ms indicating in which language participants had to start to name in (CATALÀ, for Catalan; ESPAÑOL, for Spanish) and for the other trials of the series the cue appeared along with the picture to name. The picture appeared for 1700 ms and the timeout to respond was 5000 ms. Non-linguistic switching task Three shapes (square, circle, and triangle) and three colours (green, blue, and red) were selected for the task. The three shapes were combined with the three colours, resulting in a total of nine coloured shapes (e.g., green square, blue square etc.). Participants were presented with an array containing three shapes, two at the top of the screen and one at the bottom. They were instructed to match the shape at the bottom with one of the two at the top of the display according to two possible criteria (shape or colour). The criterion was indicated by a cue (COLOR, for Colour; FORMA, for Shape) appearing in the centre of the array. As in the linguistic version of the task, there were two types of trials: repeat and switch trials. http://journals.cambridge.org Downloaded: 09 Sep 2013 5 At the beginning of each series a word cue was presented for 1000 ms indicating by which rule participants must start matching each item (COLOR, for Colour; FORMA, for Shape). Then the array appeared for 2500 ms and the timeout to respond was 3000 ms. Participants gave the response by pressing one of the two keys, M or V, according to the position of the matched picture at the top of the array. Specifically, they had to press the M key when the correct answer was at the top-right part of the array and the V key when the correct response was at the top-left part of the array. 3. Results First, we analysed the data for RTs and accuracy (percentage of correct responses). RTs exceeding three standard deviations above or below a given participant’s mean were excluded from the analyses. Second, we performed a distributional analysis of the RTs by fitting the data to an ex-Gaussian distribution. All the details of this second analysis are reported below. 3.1 Omnibus ANOVA We first ran an omnibus ANOVA on RTs including the following variables: “type of trial” (switch vs. repeat) and “task version” (linguistic vs. non-linguistic) as withinsubject variables and “group” (young, middle-aged and elderly) as between-subject factor. All main effects were significant, that is “task version” (F(1,57) = 11.21, MSE = 21084.52, p = .001, ηp2 = .16), “type of trial” (F(1,57) = 230.27, MSE = 1651.42, p < .0001, ηp2 = .80) and “group” (F(1,57) = 14.26, MSE = 55519.71, p < .0001, ηp2 = .33). The interaction between “type of trial” and “group” was marginally significant (F(1,57) = 2.49, MSE = 1651.42, p = .09, ηp2 = .09). Importantly, the interaction between “task version” and “group” was significant (F(1,57) = 8.69, MSE = 21084.52, p = .001, ηp2 = .23), revealing that the performance in the two tasks was affected differently by age (see Table 2). To further explore how age affected the switching tasks differently, the results from the linguistic and the non-linguistic switching task were further analysed separately. 3.2 Linguistic switching task The variables considered in the analyses were “type of trial” (switch vs. repeat) and “response language” (L1 vs. L2) as within-subject factors and “group” (young, middle-aged and elderly) as between-subject factor which were included in a repeated-measure ANOVA on naming latencies and accuracy. IP address: 91.240.2.62 6 Marco Calabria, Francesca M. Branzi, Paula Marne, Mireia Hernández and Albert Costa Table 2. Mean RTs and SEs of the linguistic and non-linguistic switching tasks broken down by conditions and age groups. L1 Young Middle-aged Elderly Repeat Switch Repeat Switch Repeat Switch L2 Mean SE Mean SE 822 902 877 961 939 1016 21.6 22.5 21.6 22.5 21.6 22.5 837 912 914 974 927 1010 20.0 22.7 20.0 22.7 20.0 22.7 Colour Young Middle-aged Elderly Repeat Switch Repeat Switch Repeat Switch Mean SE Mean SE 749 866 878 971 992 1138 36.7 42.4 36.8 43.4 36.8 42.4 873 895 1008 1049 1174 1253 39.1 43.1 39.1 43.1 39.1 43.1 Reaction times The main effect of “group” was significant (F(1,57) = 6.77, MSE = 32742.16, p = .002, ηp2 = .19). Posthoc analysis revealed significant differences only between young participants and the other two groups (all ps < .03). The main effect of “type of trial” was significant (F(1,57) = 167.21, MSE = 2083.70, p <.0001, ηp2 = .75) indicating that participants responded slower to switch trials (962 ms) than to repeat trials (886 ms). The main effect of “response language” was not significant (F(1,57) = 2.93, MSE = 1803.18, p = .10). The interaction between “group” and “response language” was also significant (F(1,57) = 3.22, MSE = 1803.18, p = .05, ηp2 = .11), indicating that the difference between the latencies in the two languages were only present for the middle-aged group. Interestingly, no other interactions were significant. First, in quantitative terms, this means that the magnitude of the linguistic switch cost is not modulated by age. Indeed, as it can be appreciated in Figure 1, the magnitude of the switch costs was very similar for all three groups, and far from ceiling or floor effects. Second, qualitatively, we can conclude that the pattern of switch costs is not affected by age, since it appears to be symmetrical across all ages. That is, switching from L1 into L2 and vice versa has the same cost irrespective of the age of the bilingual speakers. These conclusions are further supported by a regression analysis in which age and age of L2 acquisition http://journals.cambridge.org Shape Downloaded: 09 Sep 2013 Figure 1. Performances on the linguistic switching task for the three age groups of participants. Error bars represent standard errors. IP address: 91.240.2.62 Bilingual language control and aging 7 are taken into account. In this analysis the magnitude of the linguistic switch costs (in L1 and L2, separately, and also with collapsing both costs) was not modulated by these two variables, regardless of whether the fit was linear (all ps > .41), logarithmic (all ps > .91) or quadratic (all ps > .68). Accuracy There was no effect of age in accuracy (“group”: F(2,57) = 1.89, MSE = 11.37, p = .16). Participants were less accurate in switch trials (95.9%) than repeat trials (97.2%) (“type of trial”: F(1,57) = 9.18, MSE = 11.17, p = .004; ηp2 = .14). No interaction was statistically significant. 3.3 Non-linguistic switching task The results of this task were submitted basically to the same analysis as in the previous task. The variables considered in the analysis were “group” as a betweensubject factor, “type of trial” (switch vs. repeat) and “sorting criterion” (colour and form), which were included as a within-subject factor in a repeated-measure ANOVA using RTs and accuracy as dependent variables. Reaction times The main effect of “group” was significant (F(1,57) = 14.34, MSE = 120466.30, p < .001, ηp2 = .34) (see Figure 2). Post-hoc analysis showed that the young group was the faster one and the elderly group the slower one, and the middle-aged group in the middle of the other two groups (all ps < .02). Overall, participants were faster to sort by colour (932 ms) than by shape (1042 ms) (F(1,57) = 167.21, MSE = 2083.70, p < .0001, ηp2 = .75), and faster to respond in repeat trials (945 ms) compared to switch trials (1028 ms) (F(1,57) = 94.72, MSE = 4354.45, p < .0001, ηp2 = .79). Moreover, the interaction between “sorting criterion” and “type of trial” was significant (F(1,57) = 28.95, MSE = 2665.73, p < .0001, ηp2 = .34), meaning that the switch cost interacted with criterion. That is, participants showed higher costs when they switched from shape to colour (118 ms) (F(1,59) = 101.23, MSE = 4183.64, p < .0001, ηp2 = .63), than when they switched from colour to shape (47 ms) (F(1,59) = 21.49, MSE = 3111.93, p < .0001, ηp2 = .27). Finally, the non-linguistic switch cost interacted with the main effect of “group” (interaction between “type of trial” and “group” : F(2,59) = 2.99, MSE = 4354.45, p = .05, ηp2 = 0.10), being significantly higher in the elderly group (112 ms) compared to the other two age groups (young = 69 ms and middle-aged = 68 ms). The analysis performed here was the same as the analysis for the language switching task when age and age of L2 acquisition are taken into account as continuous http://journals.cambridge.org Downloaded: 09 Sep 2013 Figure 2. Performances on the non-linguistic switching task for the three age groups of participants. Error bars represent standard errors. variables. In this case, participants’ age, but not age of L2 acquisition (all ps > .42), accounted for a significant amount of the variance associated with switching cost for shape (R2 = .13, B = 1.42, p = .004), and combined cost (R2 = .11, B = 1.13, p = .009), but not for the cost for colour ( p = .25). Interestingly, the effect of age on the combined non-linguistic cost was also present when the data were modelled as logarithmic ( p = .02) and quadratic ( p = .005), confirming the effect of age on the non-linguistic switch cost. Accuracy There was no effect of age in accuracy (“group”: (F(2,57) = 0.61, MSE = 18.93, p = .55). Participants were less accurate in switch trials (89.9%) than repeat trials (93.2%) (“type of trial”: F(1,57) = 56.87, MSE = 12.14, p < .0001) and they were less accurate in sorting by shape (90.6%) than by colour (92.5%) (F(1,57) = 10.22, MSE = 20.84, p = .002, ηp2 = .15). Also, the interaction between “sorting criterion” and “type of trial” was significant (F(1,57) = 32.80, MSE = 16.22, p < .0001, ηp2 = .36), revealing that the difference in accuracy between repeat and switch trials was only significant when sorting by colour ( p < .0001) but not by shape ( p > .05). IP address: 91.240.2.62 8 Marco Calabria, Francesca M. Branzi, Paula Marne, Mireia Hernández and Albert Costa tau (τ ). The question here is whether the differences between the groups in the magnitude of the switching costs (both linguistic and non-linguistic) are captured by the normal component of the RT distribution or by the exponential one. This is important since according to some authors the cognitive processes behind differences in these components might be different (see Discussion). The raw data was sorted by type of trial (switch and repeat) and by age group (young, middle-aged and elderly) and separately for the two tasks. The parameters of the ex-Gaussian distribution (µ and τ ) were obtained for each participant using the quantile maximum likelihood (QML) estimation procedure in QMPE 2.18 (Cousineau, Brown & Heathcote, 2004). The estimation results into a value for each parameter (µ and τ ) and for each participant per condition. We then ran repeated-measures ANOVAs separately for µ and τ , separately for each task. Figure 3. RT distributions of repeat and switch trials broken by age groups and task versions. 3.4 Ex-Gaussian analysis In the present section we present the distribution analysis we performed on the data. These analyses provide a more detailed description of the differences in performance between groups and task, and could potentially help address the effects of aging over the bLC and the EC system. A quick look at the distributions (see Figure 3) gives an overall impression of the differences between groups. Firstly, for the linguistic task there are differences on overall RTs both for switch and repeat trials. However, the general shapes of the distributions are very similar across groups. Secondly, for the non-linguistic task, one can appreciate also differences in RTs for switch and repeat trials. Interestingly, however, for the switch trials one can see that the tail of the distribution for the elderly group is more pronounced. In other words, very long RTs contribute considerably to the overall switch cost for this group. To assess whether this visual impression is statistically meaningful, we performed a distributional analysis fitting the data to an ex-Gaussian distribution. This fitting decomposes the overall RT distribution into two distributions, the normal and the exponential one. The normal distribution is characterized by two parameters, such as mu (µ) and sigma (σ ). µ is the mean of the fitted normal distribution, and σ corresponds to the variance. The exponential distribution corresponds to the tail of the RT distribution, and it is characterized by the parameter http://journals.cambridge.org Downloaded: 09 Sep 2013 Linguistic switching task The variables considered in the analyses were “type of trial” (switch vs. repeat) and “response language” (L1 and L2) as within-subject factors and “group” (young, middle-aged and elderly) as between-subject factor. For µ, the main effect of “group” was significant (F(1,57) = 13.56, MSE = 24855.77, p < .0001, ηp2 = .32) and the post-hoc analysis revealed that the young group had the smaller µ values (721 ms) than the middle-aged group (811 ms, p = .002) and the elderly group (847 ms, p < .0001). In other words, the older the participants are, the slower the normal component of the RT distribution is. Participants were slower in the switch trials (851 ms) than in the repeat trials (742 ms) (“type of trial”: F(1,57) = 144.06, MSE = 5048.89, p < .0001, ηp2 = .72), but naming latencies for µ were not modulated by language (“response language”: F(1,57) = 0.17, MSE = 3680.44, p = .68). Interestingly, the interaction between “type of trial” and “response language” was not significant, meaning that the linguistic switch cost was the same when switching into the L1 and the L2. Moreover, the nonsignificant interactions with “group” also indicate that the magnitude of the switch cost for µ was not modulated by age (see Table 3). For τ , only the main effect of “type of trial” was significant (F(1,57) = 18.57, MSE = 4011.32, p < .0001, ηp2 = .25), indicating that overall the participants had smaller τ values in the switch trials (111 ms) than in the repeat trials (146 ms). Non-linguistic switching task The variables considered in the analysis were “group” as a between-subject factor, “type of trial” (switch vs. repeat) and “sorting criterion” (colour vs. form) as within-subject factors. IP address: 91.240.2.62 Bilingual language control and aging Table 3. Means and SEs of the mu and the tau values in the linguistic (panel A) and non-linguistic (panel B) switching tasks. (A) L1 M U VALUES Young Middle-aged Elderly TAU VALUES Young Middle-aged Elderly L2 Mean SE Mean SE Repeat Switch Switch cost Repeat Switch Switch cost Repeat Switch Switch cost 664 805 141 747 862 115 797 892 95 17.5 23.8 20.6 17.5 23.7 20.7 17.5 23.8 20.6 687 780 93 767 860 93 788 902 114 17.6 25.1 18.3 17.6 25.1 18.7 17.6 25.1 18.9 Repeat Switch Switch cost Repeat Switch Switch cost Repeat Switch Switch cost 158 97 −61 130 99 −31 142 124 −18 13.9 16.8 15.2 14.0 16.7 15.5 14.0 16.8 15.4 150 122 −28 157 114 −43 139 108 −31 13.4 16.6 15.2 13.4 16.6 15.4 13.4 16.6 15.3 (B) Colour M U VALUES Young Middle-aged Elderly TAU VALUES Young Middle-aged Elderly http://journals.cambridge.org Shape Mean SE Mean SE Repeat Switch Switch cost Repeat Switch Switch cost Repeat Switch Switch cost 565 761 196 644 784 140 781 934 153 24.9 42.1 32.9 24.8 42.0 32.8 24.9 42.2 33.1 701 736 47 796 817 21 968 996 28 29.2 36.6 32.3 29.2 36.8 32.4 29.2 36.8 32.6 Repeat Switch Switch cost Repeat Switch Switch cost Repeat Switch Switch cost 183 105 −78 234 187 −48 211 204 −7 18.8 23.4 21.0 18.9 23.4 21.1 18.9 23.6 21.3 172 159 −13 222 232 10 206 257 51 21.5 22.9 22.3 21.6 23.0 22.6 21.5 23.0 22.4 Downloaded: 09 Sep 2013 IP address: 91.240.2.62 9 10 Marco Calabria, Francesca M. Branzi, Paula Marne, Mireia Hernández and Albert Costa For µ, the main effect of “group” was significant (F(1,57) = 16.99, MSE = 67932.97, p < .0001, ηp2 = .73), indicating that the elderly group had higher µ values (920 ms) than the middle-aged group (761 ms, p = .001) and the young group (691 ms, p < .0001). Overall the participants were slower in the switch trials (838 ms) than in the repeat trial (742 ms) (“type of trial”: F(1,57) = 58.33, MSE = 10686.94, p < .0001, ηp2 = .51), and slower when they matched for shape (836 ms) than for colour (745 ms) (“sorting criterion”: F(1,57) = 65.93, MSE = 8400.26, p < .0001, ηp2 = .54). Moreover, the interaction between “type of trial” and “sorting criterion” was also significant (F(1,57) = 50.11, MSE = 4519.96, p <.0001, ηp2 = .47), indicating that the non-linguistic switch cost for µ was asymmetrical. However, the nonsignificant interactions with group indicate than for µ the magnitude of the switch cost was not affected by age. For τ , the main effect of “group” was significant (F(1,57) = 5.66, MSE = 19631.93, p = .006, ηp2 = .16) and post-hoc analysis revealed that the young group had smaller τ values (154 ms) than the middle-aged group (218 ms, p = .01) and the elderly group (219 ms, p = .01). Participants were slower to match for shape (208 ms) than for colour (187 ms) (“sorting criterion”: F(1,57) = 4.16, MSE = 6021.14, p = .05, ηp2 = .07), whereas there was not any effect of “type of trial” (F(1,57) = 1.73, MSE = 6966.63, p = 0.19). However, the interaction between “type of trial” and “sorting criterion” was significant (F(1,57) = 10.34, MSE = 5270.70, p = .002, ηp2 = .15), suggesting that the non-linguistic switch cost was asymmetrical. Finally, the non-linguistic switch cost was modulated by age (interaction between “type of trial” and “group”: F(1,57) = 3.31, MSE = 6966.63, p = .04, ηp2 = .10). To further explore this interaction we submitted the τ values for the switch cost to a one-way ANOVA with group as between-subject factor. Indeed, we found that only the young group had smaller τ values (–45 ms) than the elderly group (22 ms, p = .01). 3.4 On the correlation between the two tasks In the present set of analysis, we further explore the potential relationship between age and the switching costs in the two tasks. The first relevant observation is that overall speed in both switching tasks is correlated with age; namely the older the participant is the slower he/she performs the linguistic task (r = .46, p < .001) and the non-linguistic task (r = .58, p < .001) (see Figure 4A). However, while the magnitude of the non-linguistic switch cost positively correlated with age (r = .29, p = .03) (see Figure 4B), the magnitude of the language switch cost did not (r = .03, p = .80). Additionally, we used a correlation analysis to compare the magnitude of the switch costs between the linguistic http://journals.cambridge.org Downloaded: 09 Sep 2013 Figure 4. Correlation of individuals’ performances on overall speed (panel A) and switch costs (panel B) as a function of age of participants. and non-linguistic switching tasks. In fact, if we assume that the switch cost reflects to some extent the efficiency of the bLC and EC in the same way, we may expect that the magnitude of the two switch costs (linguistic and non-linguistic) varies in the same manner in participants. To do so, we correlated the total switch cost between the linguistic task and the non-linguistic task (collapsing language in one case and the sorting criteria in the other case) for each age group. We first ran the correlation separately for each group because of the difference in the variability of the switch cost across groups, especially in the elderly group. The correlations between the two switch costs were not significant in any age group (young: r = −.12, p = .61; middle-aged: r = −.21, p = .35, elderly: r = .22, p = .34). In order to gain more statistical power we ran the analysis with all the participants resulting in a total number of 60. The switch costs of the two tasks were not significantly correlated (r = .04, p = .75) (see Figure 5). 4 Discussion and conclusion The main goal of the present study was to investigate the age-related changes of bLC. To do so we compared IP address: 91.240.2.62 Bilingual language control and aging Figure 5. Correlation of individuals’ performances between the linguistic and non-linguistic switching tasks. the performances of three age groups of Catalan–Spanish highly-proficient bilinguals in the language switching task. The results show several interesting findings. First, we found an age-related effect on the overall speed of processing for elderly adults when compared to young adults, probably suggesting a general effect of aging on cognition. However, when we looked at the language switching cost, we did not find any difference in the magnitude of such a cost among the three age groups. Indeed, the age of the participants was not correlated with the magnitude of the language switch cost. Moreover, the distributional analysis confirmed that the magnitude of the language switch cost was not affected by age in neither the exponential nor normal components. This is an interesting result because it suggests that the language control abilities of bilinguals are, to some extent, protected against the cognitive decline associated with aging. Second, the pattern of the language switch cost was symmetrical for the three age groups. As highlighted in the Introduction, highly-proficient bilinguals generally show a symmetrical language switch cost, that is the same cost when switching from L1 into L2 and vice versa (Calabria et al., 2011; Costa & Santesteban, 2004; Costa et al., 2006), a pattern of switch cost that is not usually found in low-proficient bilinguals (e.g., Meuter & Allport, 1999). This has been explained as a qualitative difference in the recruitment of the bLC mechanisms related to proficiency. For instance, low-proficient bilinguals could make use of inhibitory control to get rid of the interference of L1 when speaking in L2, that is, to prevent the interference of the strong language over the weak language. On the other hand, highly-proficient bilinguals behave differently and in the same condition they show a symmetrical switch cost. Regardless of the merits of such an explanation, our contribution here is the observation that the bLC system does not seem to be affected by age-related decline. This appears to be so, from both quantitative and qualitative points of view, namely in terms of the magnitude of the http://journals.cambridge.org Downloaded: 09 Sep 2013 11 switch cost and in terms of the symmetrical switch costs for the two languages. This conclusion contrasts with that reached by Weissberger et al. (2012), where an aging effect on the magnitude of language switch costs was observed. Although quantitative differences were observed in this study, it is worth noticing that the same symmetrical pattern of switch costs was observed for young and elderly individuals. Hence, qualitatively the same pattern was observed regardless of aging. At present, it is difficult to account for the differences between the two studies in terms of the quantitative effects given the many differences between the two studies. Further research needs to be conducted to clarify this issue. The second aim of the study was to explore the nature of the cross-talk between bLC and the domaingeneral EC system by focusing on age-related changes in linguistic and non-linguistic switching tasks. In the non-linguistic switching task participants had to judge a series of pictures according to two sorting criteria: their colour, or their shape according to a cue. In this task, we actually found an age-related change both in the speed of processing and in the magnitude of the switch cost. That is, the three age groups were different in overall speed, with the elderly group the slowest and the young group the fastest, and the magnitude of the switch cost was larger for the elderly compared to young adults.2 We also found that age, considered as a continuum variable, positively correlated with the magnitude of the nonlinguistic switching cost. These results contrast sharply with those observed in the linguistic switching task, in which the magnitude of the language switch cost was not affected by aging. In fact, the correlation analyses revealed weak associations between performances in the two tasks. Although the speed with which the tasks were performed correlated with age, only the non-linguistic switch cost was correlated with aging. Crucially, linguistic and nonlinguistic switch costs were uncorrelated for any of the three groups of participants. That is, the cost of switching languages cannot be predicted by the cost of switching tasks. Taken together, the results from the linguistic and nonlinguistic switching tasks suggest that aging affects, in 2 This result contrasts with that of Weissberger et al. (2012) in which the age-related effect in non-linguistic switching task was confined to an increase in errors in the mixed condition. In fact, in many studies of switching task with elderly adults, the switch cost is not consistently reported. However, the mixing cost, which is the difference in reaction times between the repeat trials of the mixed condition and those in non-mixed one, is the measure that is most sensitive to age effects (for a recent review see Wasylyshyn et al., 2011). However, it is noteworthy to say that some other studies have shown age-related effects of switch cost, for instance in some conditions in which the task is more demanding in terms of alternative of responses (Reimers & Maylor, 2005). IP address: 91.240.2.62 12 Marco Calabria, Francesca M. Branzi, Paula Marne, Mireia Hernández and Albert Costa a relatively different manner, bLC and the EC systems. Hence, to the extent that such a differential effect of aging can be understood as revealing different underlying mechanisms for the two systems, we should conclude that the bLC cannot be reduced to a specific instance of the EC system. Interestingly, and despite the number of differences between our study and that of Weissberger et al. (2012), the authors reached similar conclusions to the ones drawn above. Indeed, they found an instructive dissociation: a subset of elderly bilinguals was able to perform the language switching task but not the non-linguistic switching task. Thus, the relative sparing of the processes involved in the bLC in the presence of a deficient EC system, suggests that the bLC and the EC systems are only partially shared and that some of the bLC mechanisms are protected against aging (for similar conclusions see Gollan et al., 2011). These conclusions do not necessarily conflict with the information provided by the neuroimaging literature. Indeed, there is a growing body of evidence revealing that bLC and EC share some common neural substrate. For instance, Abutalebi and Green (2007) suggested that the same neural regions (the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, the anterior cingulate cortex and the caudate nucleus) are engaged during both language switching tasks (e.g., Abutalebi, Della Rosa, Ding, Weekes, Costa & Green, 2013; Abutalebi, Della Rosa, Green, Hernandez, Scifo, Keim, Cappa & Costa, 2012; Garbin et al., 2011; Hernandez et al., 2001; for a review see also HervaisAdelman et al., 2011) and non-linguistic switching tasks (e.g., Botvinick, Braver, Barch, Carter & Cohen, 2001; Botvinick, Cohen & Carter, 2004). This evidence supports the hypothesis that the mechanisms for language control are subsidiary to those of the domain-general EC. However, there is also evidence going against the claim of functional overlap between bLC and EC (e.g., Abutalebi, Annoni, Zimine, Pegna, Seghier, Lee-Jahnke, Lazeyras, Cappa & Khateb, 2008). In an fMRI study those authors demonstrated the existence of a neural network that is specifically recruited to switch between two different linguistic registers but not between two intra-linguistic tasks. This suggests that some of bLC mechanisms are specific to language and not involved in any other switching task. Thus, the issue here is to determine which components are specific to bLC and which are shared with the domain-general EC. The fitting of the data to the exGaussian distribution can help provide a tentative answer. This analysis revealed that the normal and exponential components of the distribution differentially captured age related variability for the two tasks. Empirically, the parameter estimation of these two components (µ and τ ) is usually used as a tool to better describe the distribution of the RTs. However, some authors suggest that group http://journals.cambridge.org Downloaded: 09 Sep 2013 differences in the parameters also indicate the different degree to which cognitive processes are recruited during task execution (for a review see Matzke & Wagenmakers, 2009). In this context, the results of the ex-Gaussian distribution analysis may help us to identify which are the shared and specific processes of the two systems. This is a complex issue that goes beyond the scope of this article. However, we can put forward the following tentative account. The EC system includes a set of mechanisms, such as inhibitory control, monitoring, shifting, and working memory, etc. (e.g., Miyake, Friedman, Emerson, Witzki & Howerter, 2000) and aging affects some of these EC processes. Actually, in the non-linguistic task we found that the switch cost increased in the elderly group (as compared to the young group) and, interestingly, this relative increase was indexed by the exponential component of the distribution for switch trials (τ ), and not by a general shift in the normal component of the distribution (µ). That is, the larger switch costs for elderly people do not stem from an overall slowing down in switch trials, but rather for a disproportionately presence of very slow RTs in such condition (the exponential component, τ values). So, then the question is: what cognitive process leads to such an increment of the exponential component in the switch trials? One possibility is that inhibitory control deficits are behind these long RTs, therefore reducing the ability of elderly people to switch smoothly between different tasks. Indeed, some researchers suggest that the exponential component captures the efficiency of the inhibitory control system (e.g., Penner-Wilger, Leth-Steensen & LeFevre, 2002; Schmiedek, Oberauer, Wilhelm, Suss & Wittmann, 2007; Spieler, Balota & Faust, 1996). Regardless of the merits of this tentative interpretation of this distributional analysis, what is relevant here is the contrastive distribution observed in the language switching task. In this task, there were no differences in the exponential component of the distribution neither for the comparison between groups nor for conditions. Hence, whatever the cognitive process that is behind the age-related decline in the ability to switch between non-linguistic tasks, it does not seem to be involved (at least to the same degree) in the language switch task. In accordance with this view, some authors have argued that in the case of high-proficient bilingualism, the bLC would not resort in inhibitory mechanisms but rather in a language-specific selection mechanism that is built into the linguistic system of the speaker, and relatively independent of the EC system. Under this language-specific selection account, one could predict that a reduction in the efficiency of the inhibitory mechanism would leave relative unaffected the ability of bilingual speakers to perform language control. IP address: 91.240.2.62 Bilingual language control and aging Interestingly, this view leads to the further hypothesis that bLC should be affected by aging in low-proficient bilinguals. Further research should be carried out to test this hypothesis. To conclude, our study adds new evidence to a differential age-related change over bLC and the domain-general EC system in highly-proficient bilinguals. Specifically, our results show that bLC is not totally affected by age despite the fact the EC system was impaired in elderly bilinguals. Moreover, the increase in the switch cost during the EC task was not correlated to switch costs during bLC task. Taken together, this suggests that the underlying mechanisms of bLC and EC systems are not totally shared. Further research is needed to explore in more detail which mechanisms are more affected by age within the EC system by, for instance, using tasks that involve the different processes of domain-general EC system. References Abutalebi, J., Annoni, J. M., Zimine, I., Pegna, A. J., Seghier, M. L., Lee-Jahnke, H., Lazeyras, F., Cappa, S. F., & Khateb, A. (2008). Language control and lexical competition in bilinguals: An event-related FMRI study. Cerebral Cortex, 18, 1496–1505. Abutalebi, J., Della Rosa, P. A., Ding, G., Weekes, B., Costa, A., & Green, D. W. (2013). Language proficiency modulates the engagement of cognitive control areas in multilinguals. Cortex, 49, 905–1011. Abutalebi, J., Della Rosa, P. A., Green, D. W., Hernandez, M., Scifo, P., Keim, R., Cappa, S. F., & Costa, A. (2012). Bilingualism tunes the anterior cingulate cortex for conflict monitoring. Cerebral Cortex, 22, 2076–2086. Abutalebi, J., & Green, D. W. (2007). Bilingual language production: The neurocognition of language representation and control. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 20, 242–275. Bialystok, E., Craik, F., & Luk, G. (2008). Cognitive control and lexical access in younger and older bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 859–873. Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624–652. Botvinick, M. M., Cohen, J. D., & Carter, C. S. (2004). Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: An update. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 539–546. Calabria, M., Hernandez, M., Branzi, F. M., & Costa, A. (2011). Qualitative differences between bilingual language control and executive control: Evidence from task-switching. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 399. Costa, A., & Santesteban, M. (2004). Lexical access in bilingual speech production: Evidence from language switching in highly proficient bilinguals and L2 learners. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 491–511. Costa, A., Santesteban, M., & Ivanova, I. (2006). How do highly proficient bilinguals control their lexicalization process? Inhibitory and language-specific selection mechanisms http://journals.cambridge.org Downloaded: 09 Sep 2013 13 are both functional. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 1057–1074. Cousineau, D., Brown, S., & Heathcote, A. (2004). Fitting distributions using maximum likelihood: Methods and packages. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 742–756. Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 116–124. Garbin, G., Costa, A., Sanjuan, A., Forn, C., Rodriguez-Pujadas, A., Ventura, N., Belloch, V., Hernandez, M., & Ávila, C. (2011). Neural bases of language switching in high and early proficient bilinguals. Brain and Language, 119, 129– 135. Gollan, T. H., & Ferreira, V. S. (2009). Should I stay or should I switch? A cost-benefit analysis of voluntary language switching in young and aging bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 640–665. Gollan, T. H., Sandoval, T., & Salmon, D. P. (2011). Crosslanguage intrusion errors in aging bilinguals reveal the link between executive control and language selection. Psychological Science, 22, 1155–1164. Green, D. W. (1986). Control, activation, and resource: A framework and a model for the control of speech in bilinguals. Brain and Language, 27, 210–223. Green, D. W. (1998). Mental control of the bilingual lexicosemantic system. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 67–81. Greenwood, P. M. (2000). The frontal aging hypothesis evaluated. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 6, 705–726. Hernandez, A. E., Dapretto, M., Mazziotta, J., & Bookheimer, S. (2001). Language switching and language representation in Spanish–English bilinguals: An fMRI study. NeuroImage, 14, 510–520. Hernandez, A. E., & Khonert, K. (1999). Aging and language switching in bilinguals. Aging, Neuropsychology and Cognition, 6, 69–83. Hervais-Adelman, A. G., Moser-Mercer, B., & Golestani, N. (2011). Executive control of language in the bilingual brain: Integrating the evidence from neuroimaging to neuropsychology. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 234. Koch, I., Gade, M., Schuch, S., & Philipp, A. M. (2010). The role of inhibition in task switching: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 1–14. Magezi, D. A., Khateb, A., Mouthon, M., Spierer, L., & Annoni, J. M. (2012). Cognitive control of language production in bilinguals involves a partly independent process within the domain-general cognitive control network: Evidence from task-switching and electrical brain activity. Brain and Language, 122, 55–63. Martin, C. D., Barcelo, F., Hernandez, M., & Costa, A. (2011). The time course of the asymmetrical “local” switch cost: Evidence from event-related potentials. Biological Psychology, 86, 210–218. Matzke, D., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2009). Psychological interpretation of the ex-Gaussian and shifted Wald parameters: A diffusion model analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin Review, 16, 798–817. IP address: 91.240.2.62 14 Marco Calabria, Francesca M. Branzi, Paula Marne, Mireia Hernández and Albert Costa Meuter, R. F. I., & Allport, A. (1999). Bilingual language switching in naming: Asymmetrical costs of language selection. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 25–40. Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., & Howerter, A. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “Frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49–100. Penner-Wilger, M., Leth-Steensen, C., & LeFevre, J. A. (2002). Decomposing the problem-size effect: A comparison of response time distributions across cultures. Memory and Cognition, 30, 1160–1167. Prior, A., & Gollan, T. H. (2011). Good language-switchers are good task-switchers: Evidence from Spanish–English and Mandarin–English bilinguals. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 17, 682–691. Protopapas, A. (2007). CheckVocal: A program to facilitate checking the accuracy and response time of vocal responses from DMDX. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 859– 862. Reimers, S., & Maylor, E. A. (2005). Task switching across the life span: Effects of age on general and specific switch costs. Developmental Psychology, 41, 661–671. Rhodes, M. G. (2004). Age-related differences in performance on the Wisconsin card sorting test: A meta-analytic review. Psychology and Aging, 19, 482–494. Roelofs, A., & Piai, V. (2011). Attention demands of spoken word planning: A review. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 307. Schmiedek, F., Oberauer, K., Wilhelm, O., Suss, H. M., & Wittmann, W. W. (2007). Individual differences in components of reaction time distributions and their relations to working memory and intelligence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 414–429. Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image http://journals.cambridge.org Downloaded: 09 Sep 2013 agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 174–215. Soveri, A., Rodriguez-Fornells, A., & Laine, M. (2011). Is there a relationship between language switching and executive functions in bilingualism? Introducing a within-group analysis approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 183. Spieler, D. H., Balota, D. A., & Faust, M. E. (1996). Stroop performance in healthy younger and older adults and in individuals with dementia of the Alzheimer’s type. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human, Perception and Performance, 22, 461–479. Strijkers, K., Holcomb, P., & Costa, A. (2011). Conscious intention to speak proactively facilitates lexical access during overt object naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 65, 345–362. Tisserand, D. J., & Jolles, J. (2003). On the involvement of prefrontal networks in cognitive ageing. Cortex, 39, 1107– 1128. Verhaeghen, P., & Cerella, J. (2002). Aging, executive control, and attention: A review of meta-analyses. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 26, 849–857. Verhaeghen, P., Steitz, D. W., Sliwinski, M. J., & Cerella, J. (2003). Aging and dual-task performance: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 18, 443–460. Wasylyshyn, C., Verhaeghen, P., & Sliwinski, M. J. (2011). Aging and task switching: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 26, 15–20. Weissberger, G. H., Wierenga, C. E., Bondi, M. W., & Gollan, T. H. (2012). Partially overlapping mechanisms of language and task control in young and older bilinguals. Psychology and Aging, 27, 959–974. Ye, Z., & Zhou, X. (2009). Executive control in language processing. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 33, 1168–1177. IP address: 91.240.2.62