Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
…
27 pages
1 file
AI-generated Abstract
The research delves into the phenomenon of iconoclasm in Twentieth Century Russia, focusing on the destruction and manipulation of religious artifacts and relics by the Bolsheviks. It discusses the historical context, highlighting the transition from a devout Orthodox culture to a state-led campaign against religion, where relics and icons were exhumed or destroyed to undermine the Church's influence. The investigation reveals the ideological motivations behind these actions, showcasing a broader struggle between religious faith and revolutionary scientific rationalism.
Elpis : czasopismo teologiczne Katedry Teologii Prawosławnej Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku
The liberation of the Muscovite lands from the Mongol oppression coincided with the fall of Constantinople. The inhabitants of Muscovy were convinced, in line with the Byzantine tradition, that the state was necessary for salvation just as the Orthodox Church, while the close ties between the state and the Church symbolised God's covenant with people. After 1453, the Orthodox society of Muscovy were commonly of the opinion that the legitimacy of the Byzantine Empire vested into the new "Third Rome", i.e. Moscow. That idea began assuming a more tangible shape during the reign of Ivan IV the Terrible. The ruler was officially crowned as Tsar and the abbot of the Volokolamsky monastery Josef declared that the Orthodox Church and the state should unite in making the Kingdom of God come true in the earth. Russian Orthodoxy was torn by a disagreement over the issue of monastic life and attitude to the earthly power. Nil Sorsky (1433-1508) and the Hesychasts from the forest hermitages beyond the Volga river claimed that the Orthodox Church should be independent of the state and it should not resort to state administration in religious matters. According to Nil Sorsky, monasteries should remain poor and denounce the ownership of land. That time witnessed a dynamic development of the monastic centre on the Solovetsky Islands in the White Sea. Solovetsky saints Savvatii, Zosima and Herman launched a magnificent spiritual centre of Russian Orthodoxy. During the reign of Ivan IV the conflict was unavoidable also between the ruler and the clergy. The Metropolitan of Moscow Philip demanded that the Orthodox Church gain autonomy-and fell victim to Tsar's fury. After Ivan IV's death, during the rule of Boris Godunov, in 1589 Moscow was granted the status of a patriarchate. Metropolitan of Moscow, Job was appointed the first patriarch of Moscow and All Russia. Muscovy was first named Russia in the late 15th century. The name was popularised during the 16th century and in 1721 it became the official designation of the state. Until 1694 the relations between the state and the Church were exemplarily harmonious. Religious life in Russia was overthrown during the reign of Peter I (1682-1725). The Russian Orthodox Church could not form an effective opposition to the political reforms of Peter I who, after the death of patriarch Adrian (1700), obstructed the election of his successor. Finally, Peter the Great abolished the patriarchate and replaced it with the institution of the Holy Synod, whose members were appointed by himself. The 18th century witnessed another revival of religious life in Russia, accompanied by the growing importance of the Orthodox Church in the public sphere. The Russian theological school was stimulated by the more and more popular teachings of bishop of Voronezh St. Tikhon Zadonsky. Inspired by the Gospel and the works of the Holy Fathers of Orthodoxy, his preaching promoted the idea of the common character of human salvation. Owing to his efforts new monastic centres, specialised in contemplation and prayer, were founded in the 19th century. The Russian monasticism was increasingly moved by the institution of Elderhood (starchestvo), the body of monks of eminent piety and wisdom. The revival of monastic life was instigated by the monk St. Paisius Velichkovsky, who lived in the 18th century. The views of the charismatic elderly who had the gift of prophecy (monks of the Optina hermitage), and especially those of St. Seraphim of Sarov, influenced the Russian elites, including Tsar himself. In the 19th century the Russian Empire Tsar promoted the ideology of an Orthodox state based on a symbiosis of "Orthodoxy, absolutism and nationality". The circles of the higher clergy recultivated the ideas of the Church's independence of the state. Metropolitan of Moscow Filaret was an ardent supporter of the Church's autonomy. Other bishops, faced with the failure of any efforts to free the Orthodox Church from dependence on the state, chose to live monastic life, as for instance St. Ignatius Branchaninov, St. Ambrosius of the Optina hermitage or Theophan the Hermit. Another movement among the clergy was represented by St. Ioann of Kronstadt (1829-1909). The priest hailed the participation in everyday liturgy, support to the poor and the need for educating social masses. In the early 20th century the Orthodox Church raised the demands of independence and reactivation of patriarchate. The outbreak of World War I and the defeats suffered in the first years of the war made the revolutionary tendencies imminent. In the times of both revolutions, in 1917, the Orthodox Church remained faithful to Tsar. After the subversion of monarchy but before the Bolshevik prosecutions of the Orthodox Church began, the Kremlin Synod managed to restore the canonical elect ability of bishops and reactivate the patriarchate. Archbishop of Vilnius Tikhon was appointed patriarch of Moscow in 1918. Streszczenie: W tworzeniu duchowych wartości narodu rosyjskiego, szczególna rola przypadła świętym z nim związanych. Pierwszymi kanonizowanymi świętymi byli kniaziowie Borys i Gleb, nazwani na chrzcie imionami Roman i Dawid. Borys i Gleb zostali uznani za świętych jako "strastotierpcy", tzn. cierpiący męki. W ten sposób powstał nowy typ świętości, znany szczególnie na ziemiach ruskich. Tytuł "równy apostołom" w tradycji bizantyjskiej przypisuje się zwykle pierwszym misjonarzom danego kraju. W przypadku ziem ruskich mianem tym określano księżnę Olgę i księcia Włodzimierza. Kolejną grupą wśród pierwszych świętych ruskich są "podwiżniki". Określenie to dotyczy osób duchownych i świeckich podejmujących heroiczny wysiłek duchowo-ascetyczny (Antoni i Teodozy Pieczerski, Cyryl Turowski). Osobna grupę świętych w Rosji stanowią "błagowierni" książęta. Mianem tym określano panujących, którzy przyczynili się do rozwoju chrześcijaństwa i prowadzili życie zgodne z nauką Cerkwi. Do tego grona należy książę smoleński Rościsław i księcia Aleksandra Newskiego. Odrodzenia życia religijnego na Rusi Moskiewskiej nastąpiło w XIV w. Na dużą skalę rozwijało się życie monastyczne, a chrześcijaństwo przeniknęło do wszystkich form życia (polityki, kultury, etc.). Nowy impuls do życia duchowego mieszkańców ziem ruskich wniósł św. Sergiusz z Radoneża, propagator życia kontemplacyjnego i założyciel Ławry Św. Trójcy. Wyzwolenie ziem ruskich z niewoli mongolskiej zbiegło się w czasie z upadkiem Konstantynopola. Mieszkańcy Księstwa Moskiewskiego uważali, zgodnie z tradycją bizantyjską, że państwo jest tak samo potrzebne do zbawienia jak Cerkiew, a ścisłe powiązanie państwa z Cerkwią wyraża związek ludzi z Bogiem. Po 1453 r., na Rusi Moskiewskiej, wśród prawosławnych powszechnie panowało przekonanie, że uprawnienia cesarstwa bizantyjskiego przeszły na "Trzeci Rzym", czyli Moskwę. W tym okresie nastąpił rozwój ośrodka zakonnego na Wyspach Sołowieckich na Morzu Białym. Święci mnisi sołowieccy Sawwati, Zosima i Herman stworzyli wielkie duchowe centrum
Białostockie Teki Historyczne
The Russian Orthodox Church was and is the most numerous faith community in the Russian Federation, Belarus, Moldova, and Ukraine. 1 Eastern Christianity has been a fixed component of religious life for over a thousand years of Russian history. The Eastern Christian tradition in Central and Eastern Europe is rooted deeply in all forms of local life. Its influences are particularly conspicuous in the growth of the cult of holy images and monastic life, which strongly supported the religiousness of many nations. The Byzantine material culture was even more important. The second wave of its influence came after the fall of Constantinople, when many Greek masters of painting moved to the Balkans and the Ruthenian lands. The vast sphere of Byzantine intellectual culture, so inaccessible to western societies, was acquired and accepted in Eastern Europe in the Greek and Old Church Slavonic language versions. Byzantine culture was promoted and popularised not only by the Greeks but mainly by the Orthodox Serbs, Bulgarians, Belarusians, Ukrainians, Romanians and Russians. At the end of the 15 th century Russia assumed patronage over Orthodox Christianity and its rulers proclaimed themselves the heirs of Byzantine statehood and cultural tradition. The recognition of the constant presence of this great Christian tradition is essential to an understanding of the religious and national identity of the Russians and other local societies. The first wave of Christianisation in the Ruthenian lands came with Byzantine missionaries ca. 866 A.D. Most likely it was also the foundation date of the first Orthodox church named by St. Elias and the missionary metropolis
Review for St. Vladimir's Theological Review of: Thomas Bremer, Cross and Kremlin (Eerdmans, 2013); Orthodox Christianity in Imperial Russia, ed. Heather Coleman (Indiana UP, 2014); and Daniela Kalkandjieva, The Russian Orthodox Church, 1917–1948 (Routledge, 2015).
Russian History, 2008
Review Essay: “Three Contemporary Orthodox Visions of the Church.” Reviews of: Hilarion Alfeyev, Orthodox Christianity. Vol. I: The History and Canonical Structure of the Orthodox Church (Yonkers NY: St Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 2011). 350 p. and Vol. II: Doctrine and Teaching of the Orthodox Church (Yonkers NY: St Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 2011). Part Five: “The Church” (387-488); Boris Bobrinskoy, The Mystery of the Church [Le Mystère de l’Église, Paris, 2003] (Yonkers NY: St Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 2012). 292 p. Jean-Claude Larchet, L’Église, Corps du Christ Vol. I. Nature et structure. Vol. II. Les relations entre les Églises (Paris: Le Cerf, 2012). Vol. I, 255 p.; Vol. II, 231 p. St Vladimir’s Theological Quarterly 58, 2 (2014), 217-234.
Religion in Communist Lands
For the last 60 years or more, the existence of the True Orthodox Church has been one of the best-kept secrets of Soviet 'reality'. The 'True Orthodox', or 'Catacomb', or 'Tikhonite' Church claims to be the direct descendant of the Russian Orthodox Church as it existed before the revolution and in the first decade after the revolution under Patriarch Tikhon and his successor, the locum tenens of the
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.
Cuadernos de Historia Moderna 45(1), 81-109., 2020
World Policy Journal, Duke University Press., 2017
6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENT (ICENV2018): Empowering Environment and Sustainable Engineering Nexus Through Green Technology, 2019
Revista de Derecho Ambiental, 2024
Journal of Multilingual Theories and Practices, 2024
INDIAN DRUGS, 2017
Neuro-Oncology, 2012
1998
Proceedings of the 1st Vocational Education International Conference (VEIC 2019), 2019
Journal on Educational Technology, 2009
Центральноазиатский журнал образования и инноваций, 2023
JPPPF (Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika), Volume 10 Issue 2, December 2024, 2024
Canadian Urological Association journal, 2021
International journal of environmental research and public health, 2017