Mapa conceptual comportamiento organizacional

trata sobre como es importante enfocar los esfuerzo de la parte directiva de conocer cada uno de los aspectos que conforman a la organización en especial el RR:HH

Book, 2024

In the continuously changing field of social sciences, ethical considerations in anthropological studies pose unprecedented challenges. The book Reviving and ReWriting Ethics in Social Research For Commoning the Community embarks on a transformative journey, moving beyond historical analysis to address pressing contemporary questions about the norms governing anthropological study. Who guards the guardians? What ethical challenges does the modern era pose for anthropological sciences? These are the critical questions explored in this comprehensive exploration of the ethical landscape of social research. As the ethical foundations of social research shift with political, intellectual, and societal changes, there is a pressing need to reassess the purpose of anthropological knowledge and the responsibility of researchers towards the communities they study. The book raises vital concerns about the evolving nature of ethical considerations, challenging traditional notions of ethical research. It highlights the ethical and axiological dilemmas faced by anthropologists in the modern era, emphasizing the need for a more community-centric approach that actively benefits the studied communities. Reviving and ReWriting Ethics in Social Research For Commoning the Community does not analyze the problem; it offers a compelling solution. Drawing on historical perspectives and contemporary insights, the book navigates ethical dilemmas, researcher relationships, privacy, authority, and knowledge democracy. It challenges anthropologists to rethink the discipline's ethical foundations and advocates for the inclusion of marginalized voices. By providing practical examples involving migrant laborers in Malaysia and Indigenous communities in Bangladesh, the book guides researchers toward a more equitable and ethical practice of social research. It is a force that reshapes the ethical landscape of social sciences, urging a community-centric approach that aligns with modern moral and ethical standards.

The Mathematics Educator, 2015

As with much contemporary philosophical and scienti c research, the predominant metaphysics of situatedness is monism, particularly, physicalism. Here, we claim that while monism is the proper metaphysical thesis, empiricallysupported theories of situated phenomena require ontological pluralism as well. We defend this position via the example of bird ocks, which are situated systems that exhibit ontologically plural features, namely, component dominance and interaction dominance. The description of these features will illustrate that understanding these phenomena requires a coevolution of conceptual and methodological development. Speci cally, ontological features are partially identi ed and evaluated by way of the analyses applied to them. Both descriptive and normative lessons are drawn. Descriptively, research on bird ocks demonstrate that natural phenomena may not be readily cast via a monistic ontology (e.g., component dominant), even at the same scale of investigation. The normative consequence is that while research on situated systems need not reject metaphysical monism, it ought to begin from a pluralistic position concerning ontology.