FOCUS
Resilience and
inclusive leadership
Resilience redefines
the terms for success
and survival
Divided we stand
Change-ability: the
key to global success
Leadership agility:
a global imperative
Putting resilience into
practice in a volatile
world
Resilience and
inclusive leadership:
a personal journey
Business professor Kurt April gives a candid account of
his long and often difficult process of personal change and
development in South Africa – and how he beat the system
Illustration: Mike Brooker-Jones
What is the answer?
32
Dialogue | Dec 2013/Feb 2014
As humans, we all experience deep
yearnings for purpose. We want to
mean something, and belong. We want
to touch the inner reaches of ourselves
and live full lives, but there are tall gates
blocking the way to our inner landscapes
and potentials.
Learning to scale these gates should be the
life work of all true leaders. It is a hard and
long path that involves becoming resilient as
well as changing old ways of thinking, living
more consciously and purposefully, shrugging
off pointless influence and standing upright in
virtuous fortitude.
How can I
lead more
fully, and
with purpose,
to make
others more
powerful?
It therefore did not take too long for me to
develop serious cognitive dissonance – on
the one hand, your parents claim that you
are their special/miracle child, that they love
you and that they hoped that anything was
possible for you; on the other hand, the
country and rulers continuously reinforced
the fact that you are not white and, therefore,
not “fully human” and should not expect
much from your life circumstances and
chances. When confronted with extended
periods of two such “truths” and you cannot
reconcile them, the end result is continuous
degradation of one’s self-esteem and selfconfidence. It doesn’t help this mindset when
one sees his 6ft 1inch, normally-upright
father, physically change his body shape
to show submission, in the presence of
white people.
I grew up in Apartheid South Africa, a person
of “colour” born into a lower middle-class
family. We had enough to eat, owned our
three-bedroomed home (even after being
moved out of an area that became designated
for white people, without compensation),
a car and clothes aplenty – but we did not
frequent restaurants (the handful we were
allowed to go to as people of mixed heritage)
and no distant or overseas holidays were
taken, mainly because there was no money
for such “extravagances” (as my dad put it)
and also because our Calvinistic (German)
spiritual upbringing did not look kindly on
such pursuits.
Another “truth of the time” was that “work
was a necessary form of suffering”, and that
such suffering was good for our character
development (much like the “necessary
character-enhancing hidings” I got from my
dad when I stepped out of line).
In the main, my childhood was happy… until I
developed some self- and other-awareness,
and “awoke” to my context and systematized
social reality (as a so-called coloured person)
in which I was not considered white and,
therefore, “less than”.
Continuous harassment, as a young person,
by the militarized police (and their attack
dogs) and a ban from the multitude of
beaches around Cape Town – as well as bans
from the majority of restaurants, museums,
movie houses, and the continuous reminder
that you’re not welcome in your own country
through “Whites Only” signboards on park
benches, trains, buses, shop entrances,
and so forth – ensured that one’s world
perspective was very small.
Dialogue | Dec 2013/Feb 2014
At best, people in my community hoped for a
stable job that they could go to every day. In
addition, student loans, home loans and the
like were not permitted for people of colour
and, thus, many accepted their lot in life,
and ironically appeared grateful for whatever
white folk were willing to offer and dish
out – and the inability for social movement
and creating different, potential futures was
prevalent in the psyche of the majority of
South Africans.
+ DIGITAL EXCLUSIVE
Viewpoint: seeing
resilience as a
state of mind with
Michael Jenkins.
Beating the system
In such circumstances, one can: (a) fight
back against the system (which I initially
attempted, and got involved with the “wrong
crowds” doing destructive things… and totally
displeased my mother, whom I cared for
dearly; I also had a family member, James
April, who fought the system by being a very
senior officer within the ANC military wing
and, when caught, ended up spending 15
years on Robben Island with Nelson Mandela),
(b) give up and give in to the system (either
by putting one’s head down, doing what
you were told and obeying the powers that
were; or, by trying to assimilate with a white
group – taking on their habits, sports, religion,
ways of speaking, attempting skin whitening,
straightening of hair, staying out of the sun,
etc.); and (c) by beating the system, by being
“better” than white folk at the very jobs they
held, by being smarter and more qualified in
the education they so freely received, and by
never demonstrating less than excellence in
whatever you attempted. I chose the last –
I beat the system.
33
All three of these approaches required
fundamental shifts in one’s personal identity,
moving uncomfortably towards the very
edges of one’s psyche and comfortability, and
displaying an openness to being adaptable in
the face of ongoing uncertainty and ambiguity.
When such fundamental individual changes
occur, one needs “pillars” on which to
hold, because there has to be a denial
of one’s inner self – mine were my deep
sense of spirituality/faith, as well as the
teachings of Steve Biko, founder of the Black
Consciousness Movement who claimed
that “our fight” was not with other white
people, but with ourselves – we needed to
accept ourselves for who we were and live
authentically.
At the time, I was not at all (ego) mature
enough to live such authenticity: I had
invested so much time and effort in creating
a very acceptable persona (mainly for the
benefit of white people, so that they could
take me seriously), while subconsciously
hoping that all people would learn to love and
admire the external persona of myself and, in
so doing, maybe I then could love myself (an
external-in approach).
After completing seven degrees and national
diplomas (during which time South Africa
had seen its first democratic elections), and
numerous job-hoppings between private
and government institutions, I was able to
take up a job on the board of a prestigious
international company, where I fought for
shareholder interests. It was a time in which
I invested all of my energy and time into
“becoming important”.
All was well, it seemed, but I longed for
holidays and lacked joy and fulfilment in my
work – still believing that work was a form
of necessary suffering. My business school
education also impressed on me that all
individuals in corporate life existed for the
maximization of shareholder value.
Having a purpose
At the time, I fulfilled the duties of my job,
not understanding that real energy and
influence come from having a purpose, and
living out that purpose through the work and
relationships one engenders. But I changed
drastically one day when, inspired by my
mother who, on her death bed, advised me
34
Inclusive
leadership
starts with an
intention of
wanting to be
the best for
the world
to live life passionately – not in pursuit of
money and personal success only, but to
focus my efforts on making other people
powerful and living a life of significance
(not importance).
I therefore had my life crisis, in which I asked
myself a few existential questions: Who am I?
Is this me? What gives me meaning? Who is
the “other”? Do I belong? What are my values
– and am I able to live them in work and
socially? What lifestyle do I want (as opposed
to what job do I want)? How long was I going
to mask my anger with compromise? How
long was I still going to pretend to be tough
and successful, when deep, deep inside I
suffered from severe lack of self-esteem
and self-confidence (hiding successfully, I
foolishly thought, behind education, material
success and outward brashness)?
How can I lead more fully, and with purpose,
in order to make others more powerful?
Courageous choices
The challenge, as always, was in translating
my intent into real action, through making
courageous choices. These disciplined and
courageous steps towards a more fulfilling
future, in which I had to unlearn and let go of
many of my deeply-held attitudes and beliefs,
did not come without doubts and fears.
However, I was encouraged by the fact that if
I did not do anything to change my personal
course in life, that anger and power could
continue to dominate every facet of my life,
whereas there could be a shift to an enriched
life experience.
I knew that I needed help in embarking on a
new narrative – my wife Amanda was a pillar
of strength (able to help me confront the
dark night of my own soul, to deconstruct
my old paradigms and construct new
ones collaboratively, while challenging me
regarding the choices I was making in shaping
who I was becoming) and others: the elders
to whom I turned taught me that I had to turn
from gathering more knowledge and instead
had to seek wisdom, in which I had to let
go of something every day (mental models,
subconscious beliefs, emotional stances,
stereotypes, resentment, shame and guilt);
my mentors encouraged me in my search
for self-identity and personal pride (self-love
– not the selfish or narcissistic kind) within
the milieu of disproportionate rank; and my
Dialogue | Dec 2013/Feb 2014
teachers told me to continue to demand
excellence from others, while being willing to
coach and teach those who could not as yet
be excellent.
Soft power
I learnt that I did not always have to use
hard power in my pursuits and work in
order to get people to do what I wanted
– coercion, might, control, economic
muscle, operating from one’s role/position
and using one’s authority. In fact, Nelson
Mandela, Martin Luther King Jr, Mother
Theresa and Mahatma Gandhi all effectively
used soft power – equal to, or even more
effective than, hard power – in which they
were able to get others to want the same
things that they did, responsibly. This power
was characterised by generosity, attraction
and influence, the appeal of cultural, social
and moral messages, a respect for others’
traditions and an approach of deep care and
love. I could see Plato’s “philosopher king”
characteristics fulfilled by this latter form of
leadership – and it was appealing to me.
I learnt that true and lasting subjective
wellbeing or happiness, through the
lenses of this paradigm, comes
when you treat the world as
if it is not just a backdrop
of your own journey; and
if you have a relationship
with the world that isn’t
based on triumphing over
it or complaining about it. It
is premised on a dedication and
orientation to something other than your
own interests and concerns. It is a human trait
to put ourselves at the centre of the world
and attract willing followership by eliminating
our concern for the smaller self, the selfish
self, the political self, the material self.
Role of a leader
This is a form of leadership that looks deeply
into the role of a leader; one that embodies
four components. First, the role of the leader
is to be the custodian of values, character and
resources. Virtue must be understood and
used in ways that heal and build community,
as opposed to appealing to old stereotypes.
This involves hearing the minority voice,
the marginalized stance, the “other”, and
widening the conversation, helping others
cope with uncertainty and ambiguity, and
avoiding the trap of absolutes, while teaching
Dialogue | Dec 2013/Feb 2014
The role of
the leader
is to be the
custodian
of values,
character and
resources
compassion (actionable empathy). Second,
a leader needs to invest in personal renewal
– taking time out for serenity, time for selfcare, growing in gratitude for those who
have influenced their lives, investing in those
people – and practices – that make them
resilient, living out a purpose and saying “no”
to all that is not in that purpose (vocatio).
Third, leaders must be agents of healing –
helping people to work through resentment
and to become connected, restoring
their sense of belonging, and reconciling
conflicting images of the past with a vision
for the future. Providing hope – becoming a
voice for the marginalised and actively taking
stances against and opposing despair, and
embodying hope in one’s words, actions
and deeds. And, fourth, leaders must move
beyond just telling it “how it is” and practise
“telling it how it could be” – to help others to
see the potential and possibilities.
Such leadership necessarily requires
continuous active stances against the
evidence to change the deadly tides that
could lead to despair. It is not just about
being optimistic or merely speaking about
what could be, but actively taking stances
and getting involved to help bring those
possibilities to fruition – and, whenever
and wherever encountered, to
challenge: (1) hegemonic paradigms,
(2) people who are stuck in fractured
and (3) irrelevant ideologies, and
evidence that highlights only
spurious beliefs.
In summary, inclusive leadership starts with
an intention of wanting to be the best for
the world, not necessarily only the best
in the world. It is the basic call for all of
humankind to become more than we
currently are. But you can only be more
if – through purposeful action – you help
others and allow them to be more than
you. You cannot be more if you don’t know
how to be less.
● Kurt April is a Sainsbury Fellow and
tenured Professor of leadership, diversity and
inclusion at the Graduate School of Business
of the University of Cape Town, an Associate
Fellow of Said Business School (University of
Oxford), faculty member of Duke CE
and research fellow of Ashridge Business
School (UK)
35