Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
…
5 pages
1 file
Christianity views the body as a tool to ascend toward God and in its early days, it encouraged practicing extreme forms of fasting and abstinence from sex as a way to tame one's desires and control his instincts. Women who preserved their virginity infinitely were considered to be closer to God and chastity was revered as a higher physical functional level that can help the individual achieve his ultimate spiritual goal. Although Chasity was a higher level of spiritual performance, monogamous marriages were sacred in Christianity. On the other hand, Islam is a tradition that offers different perceptions on the body, and even though the body can be a tool for ascendance toward God, Muslims were advised and encouraged to marry and neglect chastity and to stay away from extreme self-inflicted suffering which may include unsupervised fasting and resisting one's instincts. Marriage is a sacred union in Islam, but it doesn't have to be "till death us do part" and polygamy is permissible under strict rules. I would like to address the Christian and Islamic views on the body and marriage and present the differences and similarities of these binary views and the cause behind it. Christianity is a tradition that is heavily saturated with Greek and Latin influence because it saw the light under the Roman Empire that was adjunct to the Greeks. However, Christianity had its own innovative perception of the body and marriage. While the body was a public property in the Greek and Roman times and the men were encouraged to keep a healthy lifestyle with exercise, nutrition, and open relationships, Christianity came along looking down upon flesh and sex; they were considered impure and dirty and implementing suffering on the body was believed to free and strengthen the soul and allow the person to be closer to God. The pleasures of the body were the devil's weapons according to Christianity (Goldhill, 105), therefore, the perfect Christian was bound to carry an ascetic lifestyle. Christianity promoted that desires are
Religion is the marriage of mind and body. Both the mind and the body can have contrasting purposes. The mind can be used to explore virtue or engage vice. The body can be an instrument of faith that reflects God's love, or as a flawed participant in sin. I would also agree that philosophy is the marriage of the mind and body. My aim of this paper is to discuss the role of the body in the construction of religious practice, by first separating the differences between the religious body and the philosophical body. The difference in the teachings is that philosophy shapes the mind, giving it rules of virtuous ideas to guide the body, whereas religion gives rules for the body to practice to live virtuously in mind. Because of the diverse ideologies under the umbrellas of religion and philosophy, I will be limiting philosophies to Hellenistic culture and religion to those with that share in the father Abraham. These philosophies typically separate the body and soul into parts whereas in the religions of Abraham, the body, soul and spirit are regarded as one. I argue the body plays a crucial role in the construction of religious practice because the body acts as a microcosm in the macrocosm of society insofar as the body shapes religious practices; these religious practices establish cultural patterns.
Philosophy and Canon Law
The comparison between the concept of sexual and reproductive rights and the idea of gender and the Christian culture of the body with its personalist anthropology reveals their essential differences. The concept of reproductive rights is permeated with individualism, where sex identity can be freely defined, and sexual activities of individuals—provided that they stay within the boundaries of law—are not subjected to any moral norms. The main point of the disagreement between the concept of reproductive rights and the Christian culture of the body concerns the meaning of human corporeality. For the former, human body is, in a certain way, an ‘outside’ of the self-determining subject. According to the latter view, human body participates in man’s dignity as his constituent dimension. Another difference revolves around the meaning of sexual activity. Efforts to force implementation of sexual and reproductive rights, along with gender informed law and culture, are dangerous to the fun...
What role does gender, sexuality and the body play in producing the idea that religion, and particularly politicized religion, is equal to conservatism, while secularism is progressive?
2018
As a result of the Cartesian dichotomy of external reality and the inner mind, the physical body has no end purpose, or telos, within the modern West. Postmodern philosophy sees the body as irrelevant when one’s identity is grounded in how one feels in their mind. Such beliefs have led to the surge of homosexual tendencies within modern culture. While the modern understanding of sexuality is complicated, the West must begin to adhere to the “psycho-physical unity” of mind and body that the Christian worldview promotes for total human flourishing.
Priscilla Papers, 2019
Author: April Kelly Publisher: CBE International While imperfect and even contradictory at times, the church of the first five centuries helped define women’s sense of self, integrating their understanding of sexuality and marriage with the redemptive work of Christ in their own lives and communities, thus encouraging them to contribute to the work of the church.
This paper examines the meaning of human sexuality. It attempts to discover a dependable foundation and draw a positive outline for a human expression of sexual living contrary to certain adumbrated misconceptions which tend to put human sexuality in a negative light. The study argues in favour of its intrinsic goodness and holiness. It thus highlights sexuality, when properly expressed, as the driving force of interpersonal relations, gender difference, physical/erotic attraction, and spiritual growth. The methodology is psycho-theological and philosophical analysis of the subject matter from Christian anthropological perspective.
M.T.S. Colloquium, University of Notre Dame, 2016
I re-examine the traditional gender requirement for morally endorsed and ecclesially blessed Christian sex and marriage, and suggest it may be “a time to throw [it] away” (cf. Eccl. 3:6). After defining the question, I survey arguments for and against this gender requirement from three Christian ethical approaches: divine commands in Scripture, natural law, and theologies of the body, and suggest the revisionist arguments stronger in each case. Firstly, the best way to make sense of the Scriptural material on gender norms is a ‘trajectory’ hermeneutic, which Christians already apply in many situations. The Bible’s trajectory on gender points away from gender-based restrictions on social, ecclesial, and familial roles. Secondly, common rationalist natural law arguments against homosexuality, based on the procreative end, reduce to an inconsistent rule based on gender essentialism, abstracted from real procreation. The classic natural law method re-applied today can support the removal of the gender requirement, especially if brought into dialogue with newer insights from the observation of nature. Thirdly, ‘gender complementarity’ is an inadequate account of, and norm for, the bodily experience of real people, especially LGBTIQ people. Examining real embodied experiences of human flourishing and suffering provides strong arguments against the traditional gender requirement.
The Christian, cultural and social construction and definition of the body has taken new dimensions over the years up to the present day. This has been made possible by different schools of thought that particular philosophers and feminist researchers and activists. As I see it, some of the arguments which seem to be based on the Christian values and doctrine within such churches as the Catholic and the current era which is described as the postmodern era, have been necessitated by the sexual orientation of the researchers as well as the general oppression of women in such traditional church denominations especially with reference to their ordination as priests and bishops. Worrisome to some of the researchers is the sex of the incarnated Son of God or God Himself and the view that women cannot, or are not suitable to represent God especially in light of the view that God created man and women in his image. If the bible states that both men and women are equal before Christ, this is a claim that supports that sexual difference is actually a structural component of the human body/nature and that the difference in men and women is based on their sexed body. The human nature ideology therefore entails that the human race is distinguished into sexes naturally. It is this view that has come against the post-modernity philosophical view and understanding of the construction of sex and gender and also the biblical interpretation and the church tradition. If the human being is viewed in relation to the eschatological body, then one would definitely argue against the practices and doctrines of certain church denominations that decline to put women on the same status with men, for example, the exclusion of women from holding such positions as priests and bishops on the basis of their bodily construction. The question that obviously one would ask is, what would be the point of emphasizing eschatology if a section of the human race does not get what the other section of the human race gets, that is, why discriminate women against ordination if the sole worry and goal of our carrying of the message of Christ and keeping the Christian values is the eschatological body?
SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL OF TAN TRAO UNIVERSITY
Piazza Duomo prima del Duomo. La cattedrale di Santa Tecla perduta e ritrovata. Archeologia del complesso episcopale milanese, a cura di S. Lusuardi Siena, F. Airoldi, E. Spalla, Silvana Editoriale, Milano 2023, pp. 458-469 (ISBN: 9788836641819), 2023
Centralna Komisja ds Stopni i Tytułów, 2019
Piano. An Encyclopedia, 2nd edn, ed. Robert Palmieri, New York and London, Routledge, 2003, pp. 402-409
Journal of Experimental Biology and Agricultural Sciences, 2022
Palimpsesto, 2024
International Society for Third-Sector Research Conference Working Papers Series, Volume X, Twelfth International Conference, Stockholm, Sweden, June 28-July 3, 2016
Ambiguidades no Acesso a Políticas Culturais do Estado Democrático Neoliberal - Um Estudo de Caso, 2024
Advanced Energy Materials, 2020
Derecho de la comunicación, selección de casos prácticos. Obra adaptada al Grado en Derecho , 2019
Korean Journal of Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2016
Genes & Genomics, 2019