Social Science & Medicine 239 (2019) 112476
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Social Science & Medicine
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/socscimed
Review article
How do grandparents influence child health and development? A systematic
review
T
Aalyia F.A. Sadruddina, Liliana A. Pongutaa, Anna L. Zondermanb, Kyle S. Wileya,
Alyssa Grimshawa, Catherine Panter-Bricka,∗
a
b
Yale University, USA
The University of Chicago, USA
A R TICL E INFO
A BSTR A CT
Keywords:
Generation
Family
Parenting
Child
Health
Development
Research design
Policy
Grandparents are often a key source of care provision for their grandchildren, yet they are sidelined in caregiving
research and policy decisions. We conducted a global, systematic review of the literature to examine the scope
and quality of studies to date (PROSPERO database CRD42019133894). We screened 12,699 abstracts across 7
databases, and identified 206 studies that examined how grandparents influence child health and development.
Indicators of grandparent involvement were contact, caregiving behaviors, and financial support. Our review
focused on two research questions: how do grandparents influence child health and development outcomes, and
what range of child outcomes is reported globally? We examined study design, sample characteristics, key
findings, and outcomes pertaining to grandchildren’s physical health, socio-emotional and behavioral health,
and cognitive and educational development. Our search captured studies featuring grandparent custodial care
(n = 35), multigenerational care (n = 154), and both types of care (n = 17). We found substantial heterogeneity
in the data provided on co-residence, caregiving roles, resources invested, outcomes, and mechanisms through
which “grandparent effects” are manifested. We identified two important issues, related to operationalizing
indicators of grandparent involvement and conceptualizing potential mechanisms, leading to gaps in the evidence base. Currently, our understanding of the pathways through which grandparents exert their influence is
constrained by limited data on what grandparents actually do and insufficient attention given to interpersonal
and structural contexts. We present a conceptual framework to explicitly measure and theorize pathways of care,
with a view to inform research design and policy implementation. We underscore the need for more robust data
on three indicators of caregiver involvement—contact, behavior, and support—and for careful description of
structural and interpersonal contexts in caregiving research.
1. Introduction
Childhood experiences—particularly those connected to the caregiving environment—are critical determinants of wellbeing across the
life course (Britto et al., 2017; Pérez-Escamilla et al., 2018). Research in
this field, however, primarily focuses on parents. Specifically, studies
have demonstrated the centrality of mother-child relationships and
father engagement (Panter-Brick et al., 2014) in terms of their impact
on children's physical, social, emotional, behavioral, and educational
outcomes throughout the life course. Over the past two decades, the
roles that grandparents play in caring for grandchildren, and the impacts they have on child health and development, have garnered more
systematic attention, especially in the U.S. (e.g., Goodman, 2012;
Dunifon et al., 2018) and in Asia (e.g., Xu, 2019). Nevertheless,
∗
grandparents are often sidelined in research and policy initiatives, despite the diverse range of primary and secondary caregiving roles they
often assume. Programmatic approaches to child health and development have recently called for a paradigm shift in global policy, arguing
for “parents, caregivers, and families to be supported in providing
nurturing care and protection in order for young children to achieve
their developmental potential” (Britto et al., 2017, p. 91).
Although grandparental care is not a new social phenomenon, extended lifespans and transformations in family arrangements, such as
decreased family sizes and increased maternal employment, have accentuated grandparents' roles as caregivers globally (Bol and Kalmijn,
2016; Dunifon et al., 2018; Mehta and Thang, 2012; Schatz and Seeley,
2015). In the U.S., for example, census data for 2018 show that 7.82%
of U.S. children (0-to-18 years) lived with both a parent and
Corresponding author.
E-mail address: Catherine.panter-brick@yale.edu (C. Panter-Brick).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112476
Received 27 November 2018; Received in revised form 31 July 2019; Accepted 1 August 2019
Available online 07 August 2019
0277-9536/ © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Social Science & Medicine 239 (2019) 112476
A.F.A. Sadruddin, et al.
grandparent in three-generation families, while 2.31% lived with a
grandparent and no parent in skipped-generation families (U.S. Census
Bureau, 2018). Similarly, the Pew Research Center (2013) reported
that, of the 7.7 million children living with a grandparent, 3 million had
a grandparent as their primary caregiver. Notably, the U.S. census
question asking whether co-resident grandparents are the caregivers of
their grandchildren was only introduced in 2000 (Goodman, 2012).
The nature of residential arrangements shows significant variation
across ethnic and socioeconomic groups (Dunifon and Kowaleski-Jones,
2007; Dunifon et al., 2014); indeed, research on the political economy
of aging has noted that grandparental caregiving is never equal by race,
class, age, or gender (Baker et al., 2008). Grandparents are often the
first to assume caregiving responsibilities for children in response to
parental incarceration, drug use, unemployment, and death among lowincome minority populations, such as African Americans and immigrant
communities in the U.S. (Fuller-Thomson and Minkler, 2001; Hayslip
and Smith, 2012; Minkler and Fuller-Thomson, 2005). Higher divorce
rates, patterns of economic stagnation, opioid use, and expansion of
single-parent homes are also increasing reliance on grandparent caregivers among middle-class white Americans (Gorman and Braveman,
2008; Smith, 2018).
Similarly, in Europe, higher numbers of women entering the formal
workforce and prohibitive childcare costs have resulted in an increase
in grandparents who act as primary or partial caregivers to grandchildren (Eli et al., 2016; Hank and Buber, 2009). Across seven European countries, 25.13% of households included at least one grandparent in 2010 (29.70% in Eastern Europe, 5.46% in Western Europe);
in contrast, skipped-generation families in this world region are rare
(Masfety et al., 2019). In Asia, particularly China, an overwhelming
number of grandchildren have been “left behind” in rural areas with
their grandparents, while parents venture to cities in search of better
employment opportunities (Ingersoll-Dayton et al., 2018; Knodel and
Wassana, 2004; Snopkowski and Sear, 2015; Tang et al., 2018; Xu,
2019). In sub-Saharan Africa, there are also long traditions of grandparental care (Bentley and Mace, 2012; Bledsoe and Isiugo-Abanihe,
1989; Notermans, 2003), as well as a swell of grandparental involvement in the wake of HIV/AIDS epidemics and parental migration (Ice
et al., 2012; Kasedde et al., 2014; Mazzucato et al., 2015). This literature, however, has not necessarily assessed the influence that grandparents have on the grandchildren. For example, some of the global
literature on aging and health focuses on the positive or negative effects
of care on the grandparents themselves (Courtin and Avendano, 2016;
Hayslip et al., 2017; Kasedde et al., 2014; Komonpaisarn and
Loichinger, 2019), while other literature has theorized grandparental
investments in terms of lifetime reproductive fitness, to benefit elders
(e.g., the “grandmother hypothesis”), explaining why post-reproductive
women would promote the survival and nutrition of their grandchildren
(Hawkes et al., 2017).
Grandparents, thus, make major contributions to family and social
life, although the care they provide varies in type, intensity, and whether they act as primary or secondary caregivers. Dunifon et al. (2014),
for example, noted that “the population of children living with grandparents is very diverse in terms of family structure and economic wellbeing” (p.111), which carries different implications for the health of
family members. Three-generation families in the U.S., “can look very
different depending on the parent's marital or partnership status”
(p.113), because children in two-parent, three-generation living arrangements are economically more advantaged than children living in
single-mother, three-generation households, while children in grandparent custodial care are the most economically vulnerable. The comparison between three-generation and skipped-generation families,
therefore, needs to account for socioeconomic contexts and rely on
appropriate comparison groups. Studies drawing from national survey
data have shown that teenagers living with single mothers and at least
one grandparent, in multigenerational households in the U.S., have
developmental outcomes that are “at least as good and often better than
the outcomes of teenagers in married families” (Deleire and Kalil, 2002,
p.393), perhaps because the grandparent(s) in Black, low-income families tend to be young and actively involved in caregiving. In the U.S.,
as well as in the U.K. and Australia, studies find that three-generation
residence is more common for younger, less educated, and minority
groups (Amorim et al., 2017; Pilkauskas and Martinson, 2014). The age
of the child and the relationship status of the parent also affect this type
of care (Kamo, 2000; Pilkauskas, 2012; Pilkauskas and Cross, 2018).
In this systematic review, we sought to establish the global evidence
base on the links between grandparents' involvement and grandchildren's health and development, in order to map what is known for
skipped-generation and multigenerational families. We operationalized
the parameters of grandparental involvement as follows: contact with
grandchildren (co-residence, frequency of visits), caregiving behaviors
(participation in child rearing), and support (such as investment of financial resources). This follows earlier literature seeking conceptual
clarity with respect to the construct of grandfather involvement, which
differentiated measures of “contact, participation in activities, and
commitment” (Bates and Taylor, 2013). Two main research questions
guided our review: how do grandparents influence child health and
development, and what range of child outcomes is reported globally?
We undertook a qualitative meta-synthesis of studies to date, rather
than a meta-analysis of the strength of associations (effect sizes) between grandparental involvement and child health. Qualitative analyses are fitting where systematic reviews capture relatively new literature—such as research focusing on grandparent rather than parent
caregivers—or capture a heterogeneous body of work, as they help
generate questions focused on processes and theory development
(Johnson and Hennessy, 2019).
2. Methods
2.1. Search strategies
We followed “best practice recommendations” (Johnson and
Hennessy, 2019) for research synthesis in the health sciences and
methodological steps for systematic reviews, which synthesize the most
important guidelines developed by AMSTAR 2 and PRISMA checklist
items (Moher et al., 2009; Shea et al., 2017). We established a formal
review protocol before starting our literature search. We built a research team with broad expertise in the social sciences, child health and
development, and clinical medicine, to review the literature to date,
identify research questions, and develop relevant search terms and inclusion/exclusion criteria. To define parameters for the review, we
utilized elements captured by the PICOT and TOPICS + M acronyms
(Johnson and Hennessy, 2019): we defined the period of time (T) for
studies under review; specified that health and development outcomes
(O) should pertain to grandchildren; selected a global coverage for
populations (P) of interest; included intervention studies (I) that were
relevant to parenting behaviors; noted appropriate comparison (C)
groups for evaluating the roles and impacts of grandparents; decided
not to limit the search by study design (S) or language of publication;
and thought about a priori moderators (M) potentially influencing
heterogeneity in the extant literature, such as age, income, race, place,
crisis of separation, parent relationship status, and quality of relationships, in addition to types of co-residence. The review was registered in
the PROSPERO database (CRD42019133894).
We searched seven databases: MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Global
Health, Anthropology Plus, Social Sciences Citation Index (Web of
Science), and Sociological Abstracts (ProQuest). We piloted the search
on March 16th, 2016, after which the research team worked to evaluate
the scope and quality of the literature and to finalize the review protocol. A professional librarian ran the final systematic review search on
May 12th, 2019, using keywords and controlled vocabulary for
grandparents and children, and custodial or multigenerational care
(Supplementary online Table 1). For example, the search captured
2
Region & country
Study characteristics
Child health and development outcome category
3
Study
designb
Sample
size
Sample characteristics
AFRICA (n = 17)
Cameroon
MG
CS
671
Ethiopia
MG
CS
700
The Gambia
MG
L
Ghana
MG
CS
All
available
records
2387
Kenya
C
CS
149
Kenya
MG
CS
509
Lesotho
MG
CS
10,641
Malawi
MG
CS
1635
Malawi
MG
CS
39
Adolescents in Bemenda, living in different household
structures and of varying socioeconomic backgrounds
Anthropometric survey and demographic data from
children (≤16 yr) in the 1999 and 2003 censuses
Records of residents of villages participating in medical
surveys in the country's western region from 1950 to
1974
Adolescents (12–19 yr) participating in the 2004
Adolescent Survey
Children (2–16 yr) with parent and grandparent
caregivers
Mothers, fathers and grandmothers participating in an
intervention to promote optimal infant feeding practices
through dialogue-based groups
Children (6–16 yr) participating in the Lesotho
Demographic and Health Survey
Children from two villages located by Lake Malawi in the
southern region of the country
Clinical sample of children (4–6 yr) with obesity
Nigeria
MG
CS
486
South Africa
C
CS
254
South Africa
MG
CS
3993
South Africa
MG
CS
512
South Africa
MG
CS
384
South Africa
MG
CS
120
Tanzania
MG
CS
3136
Uganda
MG
L
1940
ASIA (n = 68)
Bangladesh
MG
CS
Bangladesh
MG
E
All
available
records
86
China
C
CS
6623
Parent and grandparent caregivers with children
(3–24 mo)
Children orphaned due to AIDS
Infants with families participating in a biannual
community survey (Africa Center Demographic
Information System)
Children (mean age 14 yr) from metropolitan Cape Town
Physical health
Socio-emotional and behavioral
health
Cognitive and
educational
development
Rwenge, 2000
Sexual behavior
Growth, mortality
Gibson and Mace,
2005
Sear et al., 2002
Mortality
Sexual behavior
Tenkorang and Adjei,
2015
Oburu, 2005
Adjustment
Mukuria et al., 2016
Infant feeding
practices
School enrollment
Parker and Short, 2009
Mortality
Sear, 2008
Infant feeding
practices
Infant feeding
practices
Kerr et al., 2007
Titiloye and Brieger,
2009
Sharer et al., 2015
Anxiety, depressive symptoms,
post-traumatic stress symptoms,
suicidal tendencies
Cunningham et al.,
2010
Birth weight
Externalizing & internalizing
behavior challenges, prosocial
behavior, substance use
Adjustment, prosocial behaviors
Adolescents (8th & 9th graders) from metropolitan Cape
Town
Children (4th & 5th graders) from metropolitan Cape
Town
Profe and Wild, 2017
Levetan and Wild,
2016
Van Heerden and Wild,
2018
Externalizing & internalizing
behavior challenges, prosocial
behavior
Children (< 5 yr) from 56 villages participating in the
Whole Village Project
Adolescent girls (16–19 yr) participating in the Rakai
Community Cohort Study
Height, weight
Children born shortly before maternal death and children
born immediately before the last child born before
maternal death, from 1974 to 2005
Mothers with children (< 13 yr) from Matlab in various
caregiving environments
School-aged children, including left-behind children, in
the Xiangxi region and Changsha city in Hunan province
Mortality
Lawson et al., 2017
Sexual behavior
Pilgrim et al., 2014
Razzaque et al., 2014
Height, weight
Educational
attainment
History of lifetime traumatic
events, psychotic-like experience
Perry, 2017
Sun et al., 2017
(continued on next page)
Social Science & Medicine 239 (2019) 112476
Type
of
carea
Reference
A.F.A. Sadruddin, et al.
Table 1
Studies captured in the review, by geographic region, linking grandparent involvement to child outcomes (n = 206).
Region & country
Study characteristics
Child health and development outcome category
Sample
size
Sample characteristics
China
C
CS
3510
Left behind adolescents (12–16 yr) from 16 rural high
schools in Sichuan province, China
China
C
CS
606
China
C
CC
886
China
C
CC
390
China
MG
L
1172
China
MG
L
317
China
MG
CS
15,054
Children (8–14 yr) from migrant worker families with kin
and grandparent caregivers
Children (1–3 yr) being fostered by grandparents, and
age-matched children living with their parents, in
Shanghai
Pediatric clinic patients (1–14 yr), and matched controls,
in rural Guigang
Mother-infant dyads recruited from four public hospitals
in Hong Kong
Preschool children living with parents and grandparents
in Guangzhou and Xi'an, China
Children (2–13 yr) participating in the China Health and
Nutrition Survey
China
MG
CS
5142
China
MG
CS
2514
China
MG
CS
2117
Middle school students from Fuzhou City
China
MG
CS
1410
Primary-school students in Changsha city
BMI
China
MG
CS
1383
Infant feeding
practices
China
MG
CS
1382
China
China
MG
MG
CS
CS
1234
618
China
MG
CS
497
Caregivers of infants (18–30 mo) living in poverty in 351
villages in rural China
Preschool children recruited from ten schools across six
districts of Shanghai
Preschool children in ten schools
Children (6–16 yr) with chronic diseases from seven
hospitals in Shanghai and Beijing
Children (8–10 yr) from four primary schools in two
southern cities in China
China
MG
CS
428
China
MG
CS
422
China
MG
CS
287
China
MG
CS
227
China
MG
CS
99
Children (3–7 yr) participating in a national
epidemiological survey
Infants (12 mo) and their recruited from Peking
University First Hospital
Middle-school students, half of whom were left behind
and cared for by grandparents
Parents with children (3–6 yr) in various caregiving
environments
College students (mean age 19.79 yr) attending a
university in Hong Kong
Clinical sample of children with atopic dermatitis with
parent, grandparent and other caregivers
Stakeholders for children's health and weight status:
parents, grandparents, teachers, nurses, and catering staff
Physical health
Socio-emotional and behavioral
health
Cognitive and
educational
development
Bullying, depressive symptoms,
panic & significant somatic
symptoms, psychological
distress, self-esteem
Loneliness
Tang et al., 2018
Psychological & behavioral
development
Wang et al., 2009
Jia and Tian, 2010
Risk of pesticide
poisoning
Infant feeding
practices
Li et al., 2011
Bai et al., 2016
Social competence
Li and Liu, 2019
Eating behaviors
physical activity,
weight
Obesity
He et al., 2018
Zong et al., 2015
Occipital-frontal
circumference,
supine length for
age, weight for age,
weight for length
Views of self
Self-esteem
Developmental
delay
Li et al., 2017a
Association with
peers, bonding
Academic
performance
Liu, 2016
Yue et al., 2018
Aggressive behavior
Jia et al., 2016
Aggressive behavior
Behavioral challenges
Jia et al., 2011
Zhang et al., 2013
BMI, eating
behaviors, height,
physical activity,
weight
Li et al., 2014
Life satisfaction, self-esteem
Attachment, separation anxiety,
temperament
Breadth of friendships, depth of
friendships, filial piety beliefs
Traditional
medicine
utilization
Obesity
Xue-Yan et al., 2016
School
engagement
School adaptation
Cognitive
wellbeing
Song et al., 2018
Sun and Jiang, 2017
Li et al., 2018
Hon et al., 2005
Li et al., 2015
(continued on next page)
Social Science & Medicine 239 (2019) 112476
Study
designb
4
Type
of
carea
Reference
A.F.A. Sadruddin, et al.
Table 1 (continued)
Region & country
Study characteristics
Child health and development outcome category
Study
designb
Sample
size
Sample characteristics
China
MG
CS
72
China
MG
CS
53
China
China
MG
MG
CS
CS
26
23
China
C&
MG
L
China
C&
MG
L
All
available
records
146
Children (17.5 mo) cared for by grandmothers, while
mothers were at work, in Beijing
Parents and grandparents with dependent children
(6–9 yr) in nuclear and three-generation households
Children with parent and grandparent caregivers
Parent and grandparent caregivers in three-generation
households
Children (2–12 yr) with families participating in the
China Health and Nutrition Survey
China
C&
MG
C&
MG
C&
MG
C&
MG
C&
MG
C&
MG
C&
MG
C&
MG
CS
42,109
CS
9289
CS
4139
CS
2530
CS
2001
CS
1125
CS
946
CS
595
CS
480
CS
71
India
C&
MG
C&
MG
MG
CS
920
Students (mean age 13.97 yr) in rural junior and middle
schools in Hunan Province
Left-behind adolescents (12–16 yr) from Shandong
province, whose fathers, or fathers and mothers, were
rural-urban migrants
Infants (25–30 mo) in urban areas, selected from a
maternal-child care center birth cohort in Hefei
Infants (mean age 17.6 mo), their mothers and their
grandmothers
Children (1–3 yr) living in peri-urban Punjab
India
MG
CS
427
Adolescents in nuclear and three-generation households
India
MG
CS
195
Lactating mothers enrolled in a community survey
India
MG
CS
39
Indonesia
MG
DR
163
Rural families with children (3–24 mo), with and without
grandmothers present
Mother-infant dyads and grandmothers
Japan
MG
L
43,046
Japan
MG
L
4281
China
China
5
China
China
China
China
China
China
China
Physical health
Socio-emotional and behavioral
health
Freshman and sophomore college students (mean age
18.79 yr) attending a university in Shanghai
College students (16–20 yr) attending a university in
Shanghai during the 2014–2015 academic year
Left-behind children in Hubei Province
Children born in 2001 (followed from 2.5 to 13 yr) with
families participating in the Longitudinal Survey of
Newborns in the 21st Century
Children (assessed at 3, 6 & 12 yr) enrolled in the Ibaraki
Children's Cohort
Xing et al., 2016
Socio-emotional development
Eating behaviors,
nutrition
Nutritional status
Eating behaviors,
nutrition
Overweight,
underweight
Goh Esther, 2013
Zhang et al., 2015
Jingxiong et al., 2007
de Brauw and Mu,
2011
Children (39–59 mo) in kindergartens in Beijing and
Hangzhou
Children (6–15 yr) living in Guangzhou or Shenzhen, two
cities in Guangdong province
New kindergarteners enrolled in school in Longhua New
District of Shenzhen, China
School children (mean age 6.3 yr) in Hong Kong
Cognitive and
educational
development
Intelligence,
verbal ability,
executive
functioning,
theory of mind
Pedestrian injury
Health-related
quality of life
Ma et al., 2010
Conduct behavior challenges
Liu et al., 2018
Victimization and
polyvictimization
Perceived social support, selfesteem
Self-esteem
Chan et al., 2017
Eating behaviors
Infant feeding
practices
Shi et al., 2017
Behavioral challenges, deliquent
behaviors
Depressive symptoms
Zhao et al., 2016
Temperament
Lu et al., 2012
Emotional and behavioral
challenges, temperament
Xing et al., 2016
Fan and Fang, 2010
Gurupdesh et al., 2013
Emotional intelligence
BMI, eating
behaviors
Shi et al., 2017
Liu et al., 2019
Height for age,
weight for age
Infant feeding
practices
Infant feeding
practices
Infant feeding
practices
Overweight &
obesity
Guo, 2014
Renny and
Jayasankara, 2016
Chaudhry et al., 2014
Sharma and Kanani,
2006
Susiloretni et al., 2015
Ikeda et al., 2017
Sata et al., 2015
(continued on next page)
Social Science & Medicine 239 (2019) 112476
Type
of
carea
Reference
A.F.A. Sadruddin, et al.
Table 1 (continued)
Region & country
Study characteristics
Child health and development outcome category
6
Type
of
carea
Study
designb
Sample
size
Sample characteristics
Physical health
Japan
MG
CS
53,575
MG
CS
3832
Infant feeding
practices
Eating behaviors
Kaneko et al., 2006
Japan
Japan
MG
CS
3422
Infants enrolled in the First Longitudinal Survey of Babies
in the 21st Century Study
Young women (18–20 yr), their mothers an their paternal
or maternal grandmother living in three-generation
households
Children (1st graders) and their caretaker living in
Adachi City, Tokyo
Morita et al., 2019
Japan
MG
CS
2381
BMI, eating
behaviors, height,
weight
Mortality
Japan
MG
CS
838
Japan
MG
DR
47,015
Nepal
MG
CS
1399
Nepal
MG
CS
211
Pakistan
MG
CS
99
South Korea
C
CS
680
South Korea
MG
CS
14,000
South Korea
CS
414
Taiwan
C&
MG
C
CS
568
Taiwan
MG
CS
19,531
Taiwan
MG
CS
11,914
Taiwan
MG
CS
2510
Taiwan
MG
L
4971
Thailand
C
CS
320
Thailand
MG
CS
320
Thailand
MG
CC
232
Vietnam
MG
CS
1905
AUSTRALIA (n = 3)
Australia
C
CS
20
Children in a population registry of mortality and
household structure from 1671 to 1871
Clinical sample of children (mean age 12.4 yr) with H.
pylori, with parent and grandparent caregivers
Children with families participating in the Longitudinal
Survey of Babies born in the 21st Century from 2001 to
2007
Infants and toddlers (16–24 mo) living with their
grandparents
Children born between July 1993 and June 1994 using
data from the Nepal Demographic and Health Survey
Family triads—mother, father and adolescent child
(12–18 yr)—in three-generation households
Young adolescents (11–15 yr) in four family structure
groups, including grandparent families, in Seoul City and
Kyunggi State
School-aged children from a nationally representative
sample, followed 2006–2012
Children in three different types of out-of-home care
arrangements
Dyads of adolescents (12–19 yr), infected with HIV via
vertical transmission and their primary caregivers
Children (7th graders) participating in the Taiwan
Educational Panel Survey
Children (7th graders) participating in the Taiwan
Educational Panel Survey
Children in early adolescence (7th–9th graders)
Children (6–60 mo) treated at Siriraj Hospital and control
cases matched for sex and age from the hospital's
outpatient unit
Children (12–16 yr) and adult caregivers of children ages
6–16 years
Children (8–15 yr) with grandparent caregivers
Cognitive and
educational
development
Kobayashi et al., 2015
Jamison et al., 2002
Infectious disease
transmission
Accidental injury
Morioka et al., 2018
Infant feeding
practices
Mortality
Karmacharya et al.,
2017
Li and Mora, 2016
Height
Urita et al., 2013
Social skills
Akhtar et al., 2017
Aggressive behavior
Yun and Shin, 2013
Drinking behavior, smoking
behavior
Ko, 2019
School adjustment
Adherence to
medication
Lee et al., 2017
Xu et al., 2017
Cognitive
development
Cognitive ability
Life satisfaction, negative
emotions, positive emotions
Accidental
poisoning
Pong and Chen, 2010
Lin and Yi, 2018
Educational
attainment
Intellectual
development
Non-verbal
intelligence
Nutritional status
Chen, 2016
Chiang and Park, 2015
Nanthamongkolchai
et al., 2011
Nanthamongkolchai
et al., 2009
Sutchritpongsa, 2016
Externalizing & internalizing
behavior challenges
Weiss et al., 2014
Emotional wellbeing, experience
of grandparent care, self-concept
Downie et al., 2010
(continued on next page)
Social Science & Medicine 239 (2019) 112476
Children (surveyed annually beginning in 7th or 9th
grade) participating in the Taiwan Youth Project
Children (6–12 yr) with parent and grandparent
caregivers
Children (6–12 yr) living in Phrae Province
Socio-emotional and behavioral
health
Reference
A.F.A. Sadruddin, et al.
Table 1 (continued)
Region & country
Study characteristics
Child health and development outcome category
7
Type
of
carea
Study
designb
Sample
size
Sample characteristics
Physical health
Australia
MG
CS
114
Eating behaviors
Rhodes et al., 2016
Australia
MG
CS
11
Members of 27 three-generation families of Anglo-,
Chinese- and Italian-Australian descent
Grandparents of young children (1–5 yr)
Eating behaviors
Rogers et al., 2019
EUROPE (n = 32)
Bulgaria
MG
CS
62
Denmark
MG
CS
2383
England
England
MG
MG
CS
CS
100
30
England
MG
CS
9
England
MG
CS
9
Finland
MG
CS
71,551
Germany
MG
L
Greece
MG
CS
All
available
records
729
Hungary
Ireland
MG
MG
CS
L
509
11,314
Ireland
MG
CS
10,748
The Netherlands
MG
CS
1540
Spain
C
CS
70
Spain
MG
CS
32,234
Spain
MG
CS
32,234
Sweden
MG
CS
Sweden
MG
CS
All
available
records
11,768
Sweden
MG
CS
7719
Sweden
MG
CS
39
Adolescents (mean age 14.2 yr) with parent and
grandparent caregivers
Children who participated in the Danish Longitudinal
Survey of Youth
Parent and grandparent caregivers
Grandmothers participating in a focus group; mothergrandmother pairs in an intervention
Professionals working with young mothers participating
in a study about infant feeding practices among their
clients
Families with young children (3–6 yr) of Bangladeshi or
mixed-ethnicity speaking Sylheti and Bengali, or English,
respectively
Children with families participating in the Finnish Census
Panel
Genealogies from German villages from 1412 to 1912
Children (9–13 yr) in a representative sample
Children (10–14 yr) and their parents and grandparents
Children (assessed at 9 mo and at 3 yr) with families
participating in the infant cohort of the Growing Up in
Ireland study
Singleton babies (9 mo) and primary caregivers enrolled
in the Growing Up in Ireland Study
Cognitive and
educational
development
Depressive symptoms
Choice of
secondary
education
Eating behaviors
Infant feeding
practices
Infant feeding
practices
Botcheva and
Feldman, 2004
Møllegaard and Jæger,
2015
Farrow, 2014
Ingram et al., 2003
Bernie, 2013
Language
development,
literacy
Academic
performance
Jessel et al., 2011
Lehti et al., 2019
Mortality
Kemkes-Grottenthaler,
2005
Overweight &
obesity
Physical activity
Moschonis et al., 2010
Lakó, 2014
McDonnell, 2016
Emotional & behavioral
challenges
Motor development
Children participating in the Longitudinal Internet
Studies for Social Sciences survey
Children being fostered by grandparents in Málaga, Spain
Social development
Language
development,
problem-solving
skills
Educational
attainment
Externalizing & internalizing
behavior challenges
Smoking behavior
BMI, height, weight
Bol and Kalmijn, 2016
Fuentes and Bernedo,
2009
Escario and Wilkinson,
2015
Duarte et al., 2016
Cigarette consumption, smoking
behavior
BMI
Cruise and O'Reilly,
2014
Academic
performance
Hallsten and Pfeffer,
2017
Academic
performance
Cognitive ability
Modin et al., 2012
Modin and Fritzell,
2009
Lindberg et al., 2016
(continued on next page)
Social Science & Medicine 239 (2019) 112476
Students (14–18 yr) participating in the 2010 State
Survey on Drug Use in Secondary School Students
Students (14–18 yr) participating in the 2010 State
Survey on Drug Use in Secondary School Students
Children (9th graders) born from 1980-1996 with
traceable grandparents and whose information was
included in national registries
Grandchildren (9th graders) of individuals born in
Uppsala from 1915 to 1929
Young men (mean age 18.2 yr) conscripted into the
Swedish military from 1980 to 2002
Clinical sample of children (4–6 yr)
Socio-emotional and behavioral
health
Reference
A.F.A. Sadruddin, et al.
Table 1 (continued)
Region & country
Study characteristics
Child health and development outcome category
8
Study
designb
Sample
size
Sample characteristics
United Kingdom
MG
L
13,744
United Kingdom
MG
L
12,319
United Kingdom
MG
L
9000
United Kingdom
MG
L
8752
United Kingdom
MG
L
4800
United Kingdom
MG
CS
18,827
United Kingdom
MG
CS
15,109
United Kingdom
MG
CS
1596
United Kingdom
MG
CS
1488
United Kingdom
MG
CS
801
United Kingdom
MG
CS
47
United Kingdom
MG
CC
200
Children (assessed at 9 mo & 5 yr) enrolled in the British
Millennium Cohort Study
Children (assessed at 9 mo & 3 yr) enrolled in the
Millennium Cohort Study
Children (assessed at 3, 5 & 7 yr) participating in the
British Millennium Cohort Study
Families with children (4 yr) enrolled in the Avon
Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children
Children (3 yr) enrolled in the Millennium Cohort Study
whose mothers were working when the children were
9 mo
Infants (9 mo) enrolled in the Millennium Cohort Study
(data from the first wave)
Families with children (3 yr) enrolled in the Millennium
Cohort Study
Children (11–16 yr) attending one of 70 secondary
schools across the UK
Children (11–16 yr) who participated in the Involved
Grandparent and Child Well-Being survey in 2007 in
England and Wales
Children (11–16 yr) attending one of 68 secondary
schools across England and Wales
Families residing in Cambridgeshire, England from 1770
to 1861
Children (2–5 yr) fed by their mothers or grandmothers
LATIN AMERICA (n = 12)
Brazil
MG
L
601
Brazil
MG
L
323
Brazil
MG
L
323
Brazil
MG
L
220
Brazil
MG
CS
91
Brazil
MG
RCT
492
Brazil
MG
RCT
323
Brazil
C&
MG
MG
CS
211
L
15,175
Chile
Mothers who gave birth to healthy babies at a university
general hospital in Porto Alegre
Adolescent mothers who gave birth at the rooming-in
facility of Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, their
mothers, and their infants
Adolescent mothers who gave birth at the rooming-in
facility of Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, their
mothers, and their infants
Dyads—mothers and infants (assessed at 7 days, and 1, 2,
4 & 6 mo)—recruited in a hospital maternity ward in
Porto Alegre
Grandparents of children (6 mo–2 yr) in São Paolo who
provide support at least weekly
Parent and grandparent caregivers
Adolescent mothers (< 20 yr) living with their infants,
half of whom were also living with their own mothers
and half of whom were not
Mothers and their infants (1 mo) living in Porto Alegre,
Brazil
Children (0–5 yr) participating in a nationally
representative survey
Physical health
Socio-emotional and behavioral
health
Cognitive and
educational
development
Emotional & behavioral
challenges
Cognitive
development
Accidental injury
Cognitive
development
Emotional & behavioral
challenges, prosocial behaviors
Emotional & behavioral
challenges
Tanskanen and
Danielsbacka, 2018
Tanskanen and
Danielsbacka, 2017
Del Boca et al., 2018
Fergusson et al., 2008
Language
development,
school readiness
Infant feeding
practices
Overweight &
obesity
Hansen and Hawkes,
2009
Emmott and Mace,
2015
Tanskanen, 2013
Adjustment
Griggs et al., 2010
Emotional & behavioral
challenges
Tanskanen and
Danielsbacka, 2012
Prosocial behavior,
psychopathology
Flouri et al., 2010
Inter-birth interval,
mortality
BMI, height, weight
Ragsdale, 2004
Metbulut et al., 2018
Infant feeding
practices
BMI-for-age zscore, height for
age, infant feeding
practices
Eating behaviors,
infant feeding
practices
Infant feeding
practices
Susin et al., 2005
Infant feeding
practices
Infant feeding
practices
Infant feeding
practices
Ferreira et al., 2018
Schwartz et al., 2015
Soldateli et al., 2016
Giugliani et al., 2008
Nunes et al., 2011
Giugliani et al., 2019
Infant feeding
practices
Franca et al., 2008
Language
development
Reynolds et al., 2018
(continued on next page)
Social Science & Medicine 239 (2019) 112476
Type
of
carea
Reference
A.F.A. Sadruddin, et al.
Table 1 (continued)
Region & country
Study characteristics
Child health and development outcome category
9
Study
designb
Sample
size
Sample characteristics
Physical health
Guatemala
MG
CS
6262
Height for age
Mexico
MG
L
4649
Mexico
MG
L
2442
Children and their mothers participating in the
Guatemalan Survey of Family Health
Children (3–12 yr) participating in the Mexico Family
Life Survey
Children (born 1991–1993) participating in the Mexico
Family Life Survey
MIDDLE EAST (n = 2)
Israel
MG
CS
2751
Israel
CS
1236
UNITED STATES (n = 60)
United States
C
L
United States
C
L
All
available
records
10,083
United States
C
L
7844
United States
C
L
2402
United States
C
L
301
United States
C
CS
79,960
United States
C
CS
67,588
United States
C
CS
10,611
United States
C
CS
733
United States
C
CS
733
United States
C
CS
343
United States
C
CS
230
United States
C
CS
144
United States
C
CS
84
MG
Socio-emotional and behavioral
health
Cognitive and
educational
development
Sheppard and Sear,
2016
Schmeer, 2013
Iron-deficiency
anemia
Educational
attainment, school
transition
Arab and Jewish middle- and high-school students
(12–18 yr, 7th–11th graders)
Children (grades 8–12) residing in a residential care
setting
Attar-Schwartz and
Khoury-Kassabri, 2016
Attar-Schwartz and
Huri, 2019
Adjustment, prosocial behavior
Life satisfaction
Children (6–17 yr) with families participating in the
National Survey of America's Families in the 1999 and
2002 waves
Adolescents (7th–12th graders) enrolled in the National
Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health, living in one of
eight caregiving environments
Adolescents (12–18 yr) participating in the National
Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health
Children (10–14 yr) from low-income, urban
neighborhoods participating in a household-based,
stratified random sample survey
Children (mean age 9.44 yr) with parent and grandparent
caregivers
Children (mean age 14 yr) involved with the Department
of Juvenile Justice
Children (0–17 yr) participating in the National Survey of
America's Families
Caregivers and their children (4–17 yr) enrolled in an
NIMH study or participating in the 2001 National Health
Interview Survey
Grandparent caregivers of children (3 mo–16 yr) with
parents absent for 3+ months
Grandparent caregivers of children (3 mo–6 yr) with
parents absent for 3+ months
Children (4–12 yr) with grandparent caregivers enrolled
in an RCT for improving family well-being
Children (2–16 yr) born to adolescent parents with
grandparent primary caregivers
Current or former grandparent caregivers
Health status,
physical health
condition
Children (9 yr) enrolled in the Fragile Families Child
Wellbeing Study birth cohort with grandparent
caregivers
BMI, physical
health condition
Physical health
condition
Behavioral challenges, mental
health condition
Arenas, 2017
Learning
disability, school
engagement
Educational
attainment
Conway and Li, 2012
Monserud and Elder,
2011
Behavioral challenges
Goulette et al., 2016
Externalizing & internalizing
behavior challenges
Pittman, 2007
Psychological wellbeing
Hayslip et al., 2014
Substance use
Shaw et al., 2019
Mental health condition
Ziol-Guest and
Dunifon, 2014
Smith et al., 2018
Externalizing & internalizing
behavior challenges
Adjustment
Smith et al., 2008
Externalizing & internalizing
behavior challenges
Emotional & behavioral
challenges
Externalizing & internalizing
behavior challenges
Smith et al., 2015
Smith and Palmieri,
2007
Kelley et al., 2011
Accidental injury
Externalizing & internalizing
behavior challenges, mental
health condition, social skills
Academic
performance,
cognitive ability,
developmental
delay
Nadorff and Patrick,
2018
Pilkauskas and
Dunifon, 2016
(continued on next page)
Social Science & Medicine 239 (2019) 112476
Type
of
carea
Reference
A.F.A. Sadruddin, et al.
Table 1 (continued)
Region & country
Study characteristics
Child health and development outcome category
10
Study
designb
Sample
size
Sample characteristics
United States
C
CS
79
United States
United States
C
C
CS
CC
14
108
United States
C
CC
108
United States
C
RCT
343
United States
C
RCT
14
United States
C
DR
66
Families with children (3–7.5 yr) and grandparent
caregivers involved with a state prison system or local
community agency
Children (10–16 yr) with grandparent caregivers
African American children (mean age 9.6 yr) with parent
and grandparent caregivers
African American children (mean age 9.6 yr) with parent
and grandparent caregivers
Grandmothers and their grandchildren (4–12 yr) from 4
different states
Dyads—grandmothers or great-grandmother and
children (2–7 yr)—enrolled in an RCT to evaluate a Child
Directed Interaction Training program for children in
kinship care
Adolescents (12–18 yr) involved with the juvenile justice
system, with parent and grandparent caregivers
United States
MG
L
12,303
United States
MG
L
8650
United States
MG
L
8600
United States
MG
L
6550
United States
MG
L
6501
United States
United States
MG
MG
L
L
3449
2846
United States
MG
L
2041
United States
MG
L
398
United States
MG
L
397
United States
MG
L
324
United States
MG
L
316
United States
MG
L
217
United States
MG
L
204
United States
MG
L
170
Mothers enrolled in the Early Childhood Longitudinal
Study (8250) or in the Fragile Families and Child
Wellbeing Study (4053)
Infants (assessed at 9 & 24 mo) enrolled in the Early
Childhood Longitudinal Study
Children (assessed at 9 & 24 mo) enrolled in the Early
Childhood Longitudinal Study
Children from three-generation households with families
enrolled in the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study
Children from single-mother and three-generation
households participating in the National Longitudinal
Survey of Youth
Children (0–33 mo) enrolled in the Healthy Steps Study
Adolescents (14–17 yr) participating in the National
Longitudinal Survey of Youth
Mothers (assessed 3rd trimester–1 yr postpartum)
enrolled in the Infant Feeding Practices Study II
American Indian adolescents (7th–11th graders)
participating in the National Longitudinal Study of
Adolescent Health
Mothers enrolled in the Michigan Bone Health and
Metabolism Study
Mother-infant dyads from a hospital sample recruited
shortly after birth
Grandparent-children (12th graders) dyads enrolled in
the Iowa Youth and Families Study
Families with children (0–12 yr) enrolled in the Panel
Study of Income Dynamics
Adolescent mothers of Mexican-origin and their young
children
Latina mothers and toddlers (12–24 mo)
Physical health
Socio-emotional and behavioral
health
Cognitive and
educational
development
Poehlmann et al., 2008
Attachment, externalizing &
internalizing behavior
challenges
Experience of grandparent care
Externalizing & internalizing
behavior challenges
Emotional and behavioral
challenges
Externalizing & internalizing
behavior challenges
Externalizing & internalizing
behavior challenges
Physical health
condition
Mental health condition, peer
relationships, risk of juvenile reoffending, substance use
Kelch-Oliver, 2011
Edwards, 2006
Edwards, 2009
Smith et al., 2018b
N’Zi et al., 2016
School challenges
Infant feeding
practices
Campbell et al., 2006
Pilkauskas, 2014a
Behavioral development
Externalizing & internalizing
behavior challenges, prosocial
behaviors
Cognitive
development
Cognitive
development
Academic
performance
Cognitive
development,
stimulation
Accidental injury
Sun and Li, 2013
Mollborn et al., 2011
Pilkauskas, 2014b
Dunifon and
Kowaleski-Jones, 2007
Bishai et al., 2008
Harper and
McLanahan, 2004
Odom et al., 2014
Incarceration
Infant feeding
practices
Eitle et al., 2014
Delinquent behaviors
Birth weight
Rillamas-Sun et al.,
2014
Brenner et al., 2001
Immunization
status
Grandparent-grandchild
relationship quality
School readiness
Compliance, externalizing
behavior challenges
Cognitive &
language
development
Crosnoe and Elder,
2002
Augustine and Raley,
2013
Seay et al., 2016
Grau et al., 2015
(continued on next page)
Social Science & Medicine 239 (2019) 112476
Type
of
carea
Reference
A.F.A. Sadruddin, et al.
Table 1 (continued)
Region & country
Study characteristics
Child health and development outcome category
11
Study
designb
Sample
size
Sample characteristics
United States
MG
L
133
United States
MG
CS
198,844
Adolescent mothers of Mexican-origin and their young
children
Children (0–17 yr) participating in the National Health
Interview Survey
United States
MG
CS
29,345
United States
MG
CS
17,101
United States
MG
CS
12,029
United States
MG
CS
6300
United States
MG
CS
792
United States
MG
CS
700
United States
MG
CS
594
United States
MG
CS
551
United States
MG
CS
310
Parents attending WIC clinic in Washington, D.C.
United States
MG
CS
283
United States
MG
CS
254
United States
MG
CS
200
Genealogical data and vital statistics records of children
in Utah frontier families who founded a commune in
1874
Toddlers with parent and grandparent caregivers from a
randomly selected representative community sample
from upstate NY
Children (10–69 mo) from families who called regional
poison control centers
United States
MG
CS
199
Children (5–12 yr) from families of Hispanic descent
United States
MG
CS
194
United States
MG
CS
187
United States
MG
CS
126
United States
MG
CS
53
United States
MG
RCT
248
Mothers and children (4–5 yr) enrolled in the LONGSCAN
Study
Children (10–14 yr) treated in pediatric emergency
departments at a hospital in Philadelphia or a hospital in
Baltimore
Parent- infant (0–6 mo) dyads presenting for well-child
visits at Children's National Medical Center, Washington,
D.C.
Latinx grandparents caring for or providing support to
their grandchildren (2–12 yr)
Women and infants enrolled in an RCT of an intervention
to promote safe sleep in infants
Children (5th, 8th, 9th & 11th graders) from White,
Somali, Hmong and Latinx families, living in one of six
caregiving environments
Adolescents from three-generation households enrolled
in the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health
Chinese-American children (2–19 yr) being cared for by
at least one grandparent
Children with families participating in the Early
Childhood Longitudinal Study, 2001 Birth Cohort
Children enrolled in the Rochester Intergenerational
Study
Children entering kindergarten (in Fall 2006 or Fall
2007) who are members of the Early Childhood
Longitudinal Study 2001 birth cohort
Mothers who had breastfed, or were currently
breastfeeding, a child when surveyed
Children (14–19 yr) participating in the National Survey
of Families and Households
Physical health
Physical health
condition
Physical health
condition
Socio-emotional and behavioral
health
Attention Deficit Disorder,
Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity
Disorder
Mental health condition,
substance use & exposure
Cognitive and
educational
development
Effortful control,
school readiness
Learning
disability, school
days missed
Jahromi et al., 2018
Krueger et al., 2015
Areba et al., 2018
Challenging behaviors,
depressive symptoms
Hamilton, 2005
Weight
Lau et al., 2019
Emotion regulation
Noah, 2018
Substance use
Thornberry et al., 2006
Cognitive
development
Infant feeding
practices
Fomby et al., 2015
Cisco, 2017
Grandparent-grandchild
relationship quality, risky
behaviors, sexual behavior
Academic
performance
Infant sleeping
position
Mortality
Dunifon and
Bajracharya, 2012
Moon et al., 2004
Heath, 2003
Brook et al., 2002
Challenging behaviors
Potential access to
grandparents'
medication
BMI, eating
behaviors, physical
activity
McFee and Caraccio,
2006
Pulgaron et al., 2016
Externalizing & internalizing
behavior challenges
Cognitive
development
Black et al., 2002
Violence-related
injury
Ryan et al., 2019
Infant sleeping
position
Moon and Omron,
2002
Physical activity
Xie et al., 2018
Infant sleeping
position
Flick et al., 2001
(continued on next page)
Social Science & Medicine 239 (2019) 112476
Type
of
carea
Reference
A.F.A. Sadruddin, et al.
Table 1 (continued)
Region & country
Study characteristics
Child health and development outcome category
Type
of
carea
Study
designb
Sample
size
Sample characteristics
Physical health
United States
MG
RCT
181
Infant feeding
practices
United States
C&
MG
L
2402
United States
C&
MG
C&
MG
CS
5962
CS
157
Mothers and grandmothers enrolled in an RCT of an
intervention to delay the introduction of complementary
foods in infancy
Children (2–4 yr) from low-income, urban neighborhoods
participating in a household-based, stratified random
sample survey
Children living with at least one foreign-born parent or
grandparent in the household
Grandchildren (8–9 yr) of Ohio grandmothers
participating in a National Institutes of Health study of
grandparents as caregivers
Height
United States
MULTIPLE COUNTRIES (n = 12)
Brazil & Peru
MG
CS
38,327
Academic
performance
Pittman and Boswell,
2007
Minority language
maintenance
Ishizawa, 2004
Depressive symptoms,
resourcefulness
CS
69,125
China & United
States
C
CS
344
Europe & Israel
MG
CS
24,447
Europe
MG
CS
4582
South Africa &
United States
C
CS
952
Sub-Saharan
Africa
Sub-Saharan
Africa
8 European
Countries
MG
CS
917,788
MG
CS
344,748
Children (6–60 mo) in three-generation households
Stunting
MG
L & CS
12,350
Children (mean age 7.8 yr in cross-sectional survey and
mean age 5.9 yr in longitudinal analysis) in extended
household structures
BMI, sum of
tricipital & subscapular skinfold
thickness, waist-toheight ratio
33 OECD
Countries
41 OECD
Countries
41 OECD
Countries
MG
CS
259,625
MG
CS
193,841
MG
CS
107,834
Children (15–16 yr) participating the in the 2012
Program for International Student Assessment
Students (15 yr) participating in the 2000 Program for
International Students Assessment
Students (15 yr) participating in the 2000 Program for
International Students Assessment
Musil et al., 2018
Academic
performance
Mortality
Pérez et al., 2007
Dong et al., 2017
Adjustment, interpersonal
dynamics
Wang et al., 2019
Educational
attainment
Externalizing & internalizing
behavior challenges
Bruederle et al., 2019
Sexual behavior
Locus of control
Deindl and Tieben,
2017
Masfety et al., 2019
School enrollment
Schrijner and Smits,
2018a
Schrijner and Smits,
2018a
Formisano et al., 2014
Academic
performance
Academic
performance
Academic
performance
Radl et al., 2017
C, custodial care (grandparents were primary caregivers of children, e.g., in skipped-generation families); MG, multigenerational care (both grandparents and parents were caregivers).
L, longitudinal; CS, cross-sectional; CC, case-control; RCT, randomized controlled trial; DR, descriptive retrospective; E, ethnographic.
Chiu and McBrideChang, 2010
Chiu, 2007
Social Science & Medicine 239 (2019) 112476
MG
12
China, Japan &
Taiwan
b
Cognitive and
educational
development
Black et al., 2001
Externalizing & internalizing
behavior challenges, selfregulation
Children in Brazil and Peru living with or without
grandparents in the household
Boys (1–9 yr) living in various household arrangements
in historical populations from northeast China
(1789–1909), northeast Japan (1716–1870), and north
Taiwan (1906–1945)
Grandparents and children in skipped generation
households (China and US) or other arrangements in
which grandparents raised grandchildren without
assistance of parents (US only)
Adults (50+ yr) participating in the Survey of Health,
Aging and Retirement in Europe
Children from six western and eastern European
countries participating in the School Children Mental
Health in Europe survey
Adolescents (15–19 yr) participating in the global
Wellbeing of Adolescents in Vulnerable Environments
study in Baltimore, Maryland, USA and Johannesburg,
South Africa
Children (7–15 yr) in three-generation households
a
Socio-emotional and behavioral
health
Reference
A.F.A. Sadruddin, et al.
Table 1 (continued)
Social Science & Medicine 239 (2019) 112476
A.F.A. Sadruddin, et al.
Fig. 1. Literature search PRISMA flow diagram.
identifying a total of 1,041 publications for full-text assessment. We
then applied three inclusion criteria to full-text screening: studies that
(a) reported outcomes for grandchildren from 0 to 21 years of age, (b)
included indicators of grandparental contact, caregiving behaviors,
and/or support, and (c) were peer-reviewed publications. We excluded
(a) 543 studies that reported outcomes specific to grandparents, rather
than grandchildren, and 51 studies that focused on outcomes of
grandchildren over 21 years old; (b) 179 studies that did not link indicators of grandparent involvement to child outcomes, beyond mentioning the influence of grandparents in framing abstracts; and (c) 62
studies that were non peer-reviewed, such as dissertations and book
chapters. We used a standardized inventory to code the descriptive and
methodological features of studies for purposes of descriptive categorization and assessment of methodological quality. Using the GRADE
approach as a guide, we systematically reviewed the quality of evidence
for potential areas of bias among individual studies. We focused on how
vocabulary terms such as grandmother, grandfather, elder; infant, teen;
adoption, caring, raising, foster care; blended family, extended family,
co-residence, skipped-generation, three-generation, multigenerational.
Specific search parameters were adjusted, where necessary, for database-appropriate syntax. Citations from all databases were imported
into an EndNote X9 library. The duplicate citations were removed
within Endnote. The database of citations with abstracts was then uploaded into Covidence, a screening and data extraction tool.
2.2. Screening eligibility and inclusion criteria
The search yielded 23,567 records. We excluded duplicates
(n = 7,148), and records published prior to 2000 (n = 3,720) because
this literature rarely focused on the grandchildren's outcomes. Two
authors independently examined 12,699 abstracts, in order to exclude
those that did not explicitly report child outcomes (n = 11,658), thus
13
Country
Study details
Australia
20 children, 8–15 yr, living full Children from white Caucasian and
time in the care of grandparents aboriginal families cared for full
time by grandparents for periods of
1–12 years, with family histories of
parental substance use, mental
health and complications, and
maternal death
Cross-sectional analysis of
606 children, 8–14 yr (324 from Relationships, frequency of
loneliness in children left with
migrant worker families), raised communication with parents, and
grandparents
by kin or grandparents
economic status vary among
children left behind to be raised by
grandparents
Case control study of risk factors 390 pediatric clinic patients
A range of risk and protective
for pesticide poisoning
(1–14 yr), and matched
factors may contribute to poisoning
controls, in rural Guigang
risk, including safety of the home
environment and how children are
educated and looked after with
regard to avoiding dangerous
substances in the home
Left-behind children can
Cross-sectional analysis of risk
6623 school-aged children,
including left-behind children,
factors for psychotic-like
experience a range of adverse
in the Xiangxi region and
experiences of left-behind
effects due to separation from their
Changsha city in Hunan
children
parents
province
China
China
China
Sample characteristics
Context of care
Cross-sectional analysis of
resilience and wellbeing of
children living with
grandparents
14
Outcome
categorya
Outcome(s)
Key findings
SB
Emotional wellbeing, experience
of grandparent care, self-concept
Children raised by grandparents have Downie et al., 2010
appropriate levels of self-worth and
emotional health; themes used to
describe caregiving setting include
protective factors, risk factors and
coping strategies
SB
Loneliness
Left-behind children are 2.5 times
more likely to experience loneliness
and 6.4 times more likely to report
feeling very lonely
Jia and Tian, 2010
PH
Risk of pesticide poisoning
Risk of pesticide poisoning is higher
in families where grandparents are
the custodial caregivers
Li et al., 2011
SB
History of lifetime traumatic
events, psychotic-like experience
Sun et al., 2017
SB
Bullying, depressive symptoms,
panic & significant somatic
symptoms, psychological distress,
self-esteem
Left-behind children are more likely
to experience psychotic-like events
than their peers, but having a
grandparent as a primary caregiver is
associated with less severe suffering
from these events
Rates of low self-esteem and
depression increase with length of
separation from parents, but this risk
is reduced when grandparents are
primary caregivers
Chinese grandparents report greater
emotional and behavioral problems
of grandchildren than American
grandparents, which may be related
to cultural differences in stigma
attached to being raised by a
grandparent
Among the Chinese sample,
attachment is negatively associated
children's interpersonal difficulties
Cross-sectional analysis of
mental health and psychosocial
problems in left-behind children
1663 left-behind children and
1683 controls, 12–16 yr
Many left-behind children
experience mental health and
psychosocial problems
China
Case control study of crosscultural differences in custodial
grandparent care and
grandchildren's wellbeing
886 children, 1–3 yr, being
fostered by grandparents, and
age-matched children living
with their parents, in Shanghai
Cultural factors can account for
SB
differences in a variety of aspects of
grandparental care and associated
outcomes among grandchildren
China &
United
States
Cross-sectional analysis
comparing Chinese and
American caregiving
grandparents' challenges and
resources
238 grandparent caregivers
from the US and 106 from
China, and their grandchildren
Kenya
Cross-sectional analysis of
custodial grandparent care and
orphans' adjustment
South Africa
Cross-sectional analysis of
caregivers and orphans to
identify protective factors for
good mental health
Psychological & behavioral
development
In the American sample,
SB
grandparents raised grandchildren
without the assistance of family in
the parent generation, while in the
Chinese sample, all participants
were skipped-generation families
HIV/AIDS contributed to the
SB
34 orphans, 2–16 yr, with
custodial grandmothers and 115 prevalence of skipped-generation
children with biological parents families consisting of grandparents
and orphaned children
Adjustment, interpersonal
dynamics
254 children orphaned due to
AIDS
Anxiety, depressive symptoms,
post-traumatic stress symptoms,
suicidal tendencies
Orphans were cared for by parents, SB
grandparents, or other kin, in
densely populated neighborhoods
formerly designated for Black
Africans under apartheid, with high
Adjustment
Tang et al., 2018
Wang et al., 2009
Wang et al., 2019
Children raised by grandmothers are Oburu, 2005
similar to those raised by biological
mothers with regard to adjustment,
although grandmother caregivers
report greater stress
Children living with a grandparent or Sharer et al., 2015
other non-parent caregiver (kin/nonkin) have lower anxiety symptoms
than those children living with a
biological parent
(continued on next page)
Social Science & Medicine 239 (2019) 112476
China
Reference
A.F.A. Sadruddin, et al.
Table 2
Studies of grandparent custodial care in skipped-generation families (n = 35, total sample).
Country
Study details
South Africa & Cross-sectional analysis of the
United
effects of social support and
States
living arrangements on
adolescents' risk-taking
behaviors
Sample characteristics
Context of care
rates of violence, unemployment,
HIV prevalence (23–30%), and
poverty
Social support given by primary
456 adolescents living in
caregivers may differ across
Baltimore and 496 living in
cultures even in contexts with
Johannesburg, 15–19 yr,
participating in the Wellbeing of similar rates of poverty, violence,
and unstable living environments
Adolescents in Vulnerable
Environments Study
Outcome
categorya
Outcome(s)
Key findings
Reference
SB
Sexual behavior
Living with a grandparent may
reduce teens' sexual risk-taking
behaviors; specifically, Baltimore
girls raised by a grandmother are less
likely to be sexually active and
Johannesburg boys raised by a
grandfather are more likely to use
condoms
Factors that predict adolescent
aggression vary by family structure;
aggression in grandparent families is
predicted by depression, anxiety, and
level of family support
Most children fall within the normal
range of behavioral challenges;
adolescents report fewer behavioral
problems when grandparents use an
inductive parenting style
Adolescents with grandparents as the
primary caregiver are less likely to
adhere to optimal treatment
standards
Bruederle et al., 2019
Children raised by grandparents are
more likely to have below-normal
development and to experience
inappropriate child rearing; income
level affects child development for
those raised by grandparents
Youth in grandparent-headed homes
are more likely to have: prior serious
adjudication, a first delinquent
offense by age 12, a history of
associating with delinquent peers,
prior assaults, undisciplined/
delinquent referrals, school
problems, and parents/guardians
unable or unwilling to provide
supervision
Children in grandparent families
have the worst reported health
statuses; grandparents provide
greater access to health insurance
and care but fewer extra-curricular
activities; few significant differences
are found for child outcomes
between grandparent families and
other nonparent family structures
Children raised by grandparents
show greater levels of externalizing
and internalizing behavior
Nanthamongkolchai
et al., 2011
680 young adolescents
(11–15 yr) in four family
structure groups, including
grandparent families, in Seoul
City and Kyunggi State
70 children being fostered by
grandparents in Málaga, Spain
SB
Adolescent aggression is of
concern, given the increasing crime
rates reported in Korea among
early adolescents
568 dyads of adolescents,
12–19 yr, infected with HIV via
vertical transmission, and their
primary caregivers
Children and adolescents
PH
transitioning into adulthood may
face challenges assuming
responsibility over their treatment
adherence
Most grandparents raising children PH; CE
were not educated, had insufficient
income, and experienced one or
more family crises
Spain
Cross-sectional analysis of
behavioral challenges of
adolescents being cared for by
grandparents
Taiwan
Cross-sectional analysis of risk
factors for anti-retroviral
treatment adherence of HIV
positive youth
Thailand
Cross-sectional analysis of health 320 children, 6–12 yr, living
status of children raised by
with parents or grandparents
parents vs. grandparents
United States
Descriptive retrospective study
of reoffending risk for youth in
grandparent- vs. parent-headed
homes
29 children, 12–18 yr, in
grandparent-headed homes and
37 children, of the same age
range, in parent-headed homes,
with juvenile justice system
involvement
Participants resided in an urban
community in North Carolina and
more than 80% were from racial
minority backgrounds (primarily
African American)
PH; SB; CE
Physical health condition; mental
health condition, peer
relationships, risk of juvenile reoffending, substance use; school
challenges
United States
Longitudinal study of
associations between family
structure and child physical,
behavioral, and educational
outcomes
All records available for
children, 6–17 yr, with families
participating in the 1999 and
2002 waves of the National
Survey of America's Families
Family structure and gender of the
primary caregiver may be related
to availability of resources and
decision-making processes in the
household
PH; SB; CE
Health status, physical health
condition; behavioral challenges,
mental health condition; learning
disability, school engagement
United States
Case-control study of socialemotional behavior of children
54 African-American children
raised by grandparents and 54
Participants selected from schools
in a large, urban school district in
the southeastern U.S., in
SB
Externalizing & internalizing
behavior challenges
Parenting styles among
grandparents may influence
adolescents' perceptions of their
behavioral challenges
SB
Aggressive behavior
Externalizing & internalizing
behavior challenges
Adherence to medication
Nutritional status; intellectual
development
Yun and Shin, 2013
Fuentes and Bernedo,
2009
Xu et al., 2017
Campbell et al., 2006
Conway and Li, 2012
Edwards, 2006
(continued on next page)
Social Science & Medicine 239 (2019) 112476
Cross-sectional analysis factors
contributing to adolescent
aggression among youth in
different family structures
15
South Korea
A.F.A. Sadruddin, et al.
Table 2 (continued)
Country
Study details
Sample characteristics
Context of care
raised by grandparents vs.
biological parents
matched children raised by
parents, mean age 9.6 yr
United States
Case-control study of teachers'
perceptions of serious emotional
and behavioral problems in
children in different family
structures
54 children in grandparentheaded homes and 54 matched
children living with their
biological parents, mean age
9.6 yr
communities where many residents
had low socio-economic status
(e.g., qualifying for free/reduced
school lunch)
Participants selected from schools SB
in a large, urban school district in
the southeastern U.S., in primarily
African American communities
where many residents had low
socio-economic status
United States
Longitudinal study of adolescent 7844 children, 12–18 yr,
antisocial and problem behavior participating in the National
in custodial grandparent families Longitudinal Study of
Adolescent Health
79 grandparents and 222
Longitudinal study of
biological parents of children,
grandparent-grandchild
mean age 9.44 yr
wellbeing
United States
United States
16
United States
Custodial grandmothers may be
able to provide more supervision
and support than some biological
or foster parents
Caregivers had a range of
backgrounds in terms of racial/
ethnic identity, marital status,
employment status and annual
income
Outcome
categorya
SB
SB
Cross-sectional analysis of
14 children, 10–16 yr, and their Participants were African
SB
experiences of African-American grandparent caregivers
American, and grandchildren had
children raised by grandparents
lived in grandparents' homes for at
least 2 months for reasons
including parents' medical illness,
death, or mental or psychiatric
illness; teen pregnancy; eviction or
housing problems; neglect; or
substance use
Participants resided in one of two SB
Cross-sectional analysis of
230 children, 2–16 yr, from
baseline data of intervention to households with absent parents, major metropolitan areas in the
southeastern U.S., with some
where grandmothers are the
improve grandparental
grandchildren raised by
primary caregivers
wellbeing
grandparents through formal
custody agreements, and others not
Longitudinal study of
relationships between household
structure & educational
attainment of children
10,083 children, in grades 7 to
12, living in one of eight
different caregiving
environments, enrolled in
National Longitudinal Study
Adolescent Health
United States
Randomized controlled trial to
improve outcomes for children
living with grandmothers or
great-grandmothers
United States
Cross-sectional analysis of
grandchild wellbeing, with
14 dyads consisting of a
Children predominantly Caucasian, SB
grandmother or greatalthough African, American,
grandmother and a child, 2–7 yr Hispanic and biracial children also
included; caregivers came from an
array of socioeconomic and
educational backgrounds
Caregivers were predominantly
PH
married, employed, and Caucasian
CE
Key findings
Reference
challenges in comparison with
children living with biological
parents
Edwards, 2009
Emotional & behavioral challenges Teachers rate children raised by
grandparents as exhibiting higher
levels of a specific pattern of
behavioral challenges, including
somatic complaints, anxiety,
depression, social challenges, and
thought and attention difficulties
Behavioral challenges
Caregiver type does not significantly Goulette et al., 2016
predict adolescent problem
behaviors
Psychological wellbeing
Experience of grandparent care
Externalizing & internalizing
behavior challenges
Educational attainment
Externalizing & internalizing
behavior challenges
Accidental injury
Grandchild and grandparent
Hayslip et al., 2014
wellbeing are related in a
bidirectional manner, but grandchild
difficulties have a greater impact on
grandparent distress than do
grandparent difficulties on
grandchild distress
Kelch-Oliver, 2011
Children experience adjustment
issues as a result of family disruption
and parental loss, but generally feel
content living with their
grandparents
Children of grandmother caregivers
who have increased psychological
distress, fewer family resources, less
social support, and less supportive
home environments have increased
externalizing and internalizing
behavioral challenges
Children in skipped-generation
households have persistent
disadvantages in terms of
educational attainment: they are less
likely to complete high school and
enroll in or complete college (this is
partially explained by socioeconomic
resources, but not parenting quality)
The CDIT intervention protocol
results in significantly decreased
internalizing behaviors among
grandchildren and more effective
parenting practices among
grandparents
Rates of grandchild injury are
explained by grandparent sex,
Kelley et al., 2011
Monserud and Elder,
2011
N’Zi et al., 2016
Nadorff and Patrick,
2018
(continued on next page)
Social Science & Medicine 239 (2019) 112476
Participants selected from 80 high
schools and 52 middle schools
across the U.S.; characteristics of
the study population were
consistent with a nationally
representative sample
United States
Outcome(s)
A.F.A. Sadruddin, et al.
Table 2 (continued)
Country
Study details
Sample characteristics
Context of care
regard to safety and injury
prevention
144 grandparents who are past
or current caregivers for their
grandchildren
Participants tended to be of lower
84 children, 9 yr, raised solely
by grandparents and enrolled in socioeconomic status and births
outside of marriage were common
the Fragile Families Child
Wellbeing Study birth cohort
Outcome
categorya
Outcome(s)
Reference
depressive symptoms, and safety
knowledge
PH; SB; CE
BMI, physical health condition;
externalizing & internalizing
behavior challenges, mental
health condition, social skills;
academic performance, cognitive
ability, developmental delay
United States
Longitudinal study of how types
of grandmother involvement
influence grandchildren's
functioning
United States
Cross-sectional analysis of
grandparental care and
attachment representations in
association with child behavior
problems
United States
Cross-sectional analysis of the
association between household
arrangement and opioid misuse
among justice-involved children
United States
Cross-sectional analysis
examining relationship between
grand-maternal parenting and
grandchild psychological
adjustment
United States
343 custodial grandmothers and
Randomized controlled trial to
compare the effectiveness of
their grandchildren, 4–12 yr,
three intervention models for
from four different states
reducing children's externalizing
and internalizing behavior
challenges
Children resided with grandparents SB
exclusively for at least three
months, and families were fluent
speakers of English, identifying as
Caucasian, African American or
Hispanic/Latinx
Externalizing & internalizing
behavior challenges
United States
Cross-sectional analysis of the
effects of grandmothers' coping
resources on their
grandchildren's behaviors
733 grandmothers and their
grandchildren, 3 mo–16 yr, with
the children's parents absent for
3+ months
Children resided with grandparents SB
exclusively for at least three
months, and participating families
were diverse with regard to marital
Externalizing & internalizing
behavior challenges
Participants were from low-income SB
families, residing in urban
neighborhoods in Boston, Chicago
and San Diego
SB
Participants resided in the
Midwestern region of the U.S., with
about half of families recruited via
community support groups, state
extension offices, the Department
of Health and Family Services
kinship care unit, and church
groups, and the other half from a
medium-minimum security state
prison for women
SB
Living in a single-parent home,
79,960 justice-involved
which is common among justicechildren, mean age 14 yr,
involved children, is linked to
involved with the Florida
Department of Juvenile Justice likelihood of opioid misuse, putting
youth in these circumstances at
higher risk of opioid-related
overdose
343 children, 4–12 yr, and their Children resided with grandparents SB
exclusively for at least three
grandmothers enrolled at
months, and families were fluent
baseline in an RCT for
speakers of English, identifying as
improving family well-being
Caucasian, African American or
Hispanic/Latinx
Externalizing & internalizing
behavior challenges
Attachment, externalizing &
internalizing behavior challenges
Parenting practices are similar
between grandparent families and
other structures, but child wellbeing
and academic outcomes are poorer,
with higher rates of externalizing
behavior challenges, grade repetition
in school, and delinquent activities
among children raise by
grandparents
Young adolescents with a custodial
grandmother present more
externalizing behavior challenges
over time than their similarly
economically disadvantaged peers
Children include more relationship
violence in their representations of
relationships when grandparents
report more depressive symptoms;
children exhibit fewer externalizing
behavior challenges when
grandparents are more responsive
and when children hold positive
family representations
Pilkauskas and Dunifon,
2016
Pittman, 2007
Poehlmann et al., 2008
Substance use
Justice-involved children are 28% as Shaw et al., 2019
likely to report opioid misuse in the
past 30 days as those living in a
single-parent home; grandparentheaded homes may be associated
with increased access to opioids
Externalizing & internalizing
behavior challenges
Grandmothers' reports of grandchild Smith et al., 2018
externalizing and internalizing
behavior challenges are related to
grandmother distress and parenting
practices, but children's self-reported
symptoms are unrelated to
grandmother factors
Smith et al., 2018b
Children exposed to the cognitive
behavioral therapy (CBT) and
behavioral parent training (BPT)
interventions have better outcomes
than those exposed to the
information-only control program;
there is little difference in
effectiveness between CBT and BPT
for children's behavior
Ineffective parenting has a direct
Smith et al., 2015
effect on externalizing and
internalizing behavior challenges in
grandchildren; custodial
(continued on next page)
Social Science & Medicine 239 (2019) 112476
Cross-sectional analysis of child
outcomes and grand-family
characteristics, compared with
other family structures
17
United States
2402 children, 10–14 yr, and
caregivers in low-income, urban
neighborhoods from a
household-based, stratified
random sample survey
Children, 3–7.5 yr, with no
parent at home; 37 families with
a parent in a state prison and 42
families recruited via a
community agency
Key findings
A.F.A. Sadruddin, et al.
Table 2 (continued)
Social Science & Medicine 239 (2019) 112476
Ziol-Guest and Dunifon,
2014
Smith and Palmieri,
2007
well studies answered the research questions—rather than the precision
of outcome findings and publication bias—because our review aimed to
improve research decisions, rather than reach clinical guidelines. We
measured the inter-rater reliability (Kappa = 0.889) of ratings with a
subsample of 100 papers; a kappa score of 0.80 or above reflects good
trustworthiness of decisions (Shea et al., 2017). A third author reviewed
in full the 206 publications included in the final database, to ensure
consistency and adherence to the search strategy (PRISMA, Fig. 1).
Characteristics of the study
population were consistent with a
nationally representative sample
67,588 children, 0–17 yr, from
two waves of the National
Survey of America's Families
Cross-sectional analysis of
association between complex
living arrangements and
children's health
United States
Our analyses proceeded in two steps. First, we tabulated the total
sample (n = 206) of published work with respect to geographic location, study design, sample characteristics, types of care in skippedgeneration or multigenerational settings, and child health and development outcomes (Table 1). We recorded whether studies were longitudinal, cross-sectional, case control, randomized controlled trials,
descriptive retrospective, or ethnographic, and whether children were
living with a grandparent, with or without their parents. We documented methodological quality, such as sample sizes and the characteristics of population sub-groups under consideration. We categorized outcomes as follows: physical health, socio-emotional and
behavioral health, and cognitive and educational development. Where
categories overlap (e.g., social, psychological, socio-emotional, and
socio-behavioral outcomes), we followed the rubric adopted in recent
child development literature (e.g., Tanskanen and Danielsbacka, 2017).
Second, we analyzed the review database to evaluate the quality of
literature to date and the factors potentially influencing the heterogeneity of grandparent care and child health. We followed a structured
approach to evidence synthesis to examine the limitations, relevance,
coherence, and adequacy of data (Johnson and Hennessy, 2019; Lewin
et al., 2015). At a descriptive level, we identified the types of households featuring grandparent involvement and the range of child outcomes (Table 1). At an interpretive level, we identified major findings,
intervening variables, and research gaps for skipped-generation
(Table 2) and multigenerational (Table 3) families. We included in
Table 2 the total sample of studies pertaining to custodial grandparents
caring for children in skipped-generation families, as these publications
were small in number (n = 35). To generate comparable data in
Table 3, we tabulated one multigenerational study per country or multicountry combination (n = 48), to indicate the global scope of research
to date; where there were multiple studies per country, we made a
purposive selection based on study design (longitudinal over crosssectional) and largest sample size (capturing more diverse and/or nationally representative samples). In both Tables 2 and 3, we provided
additional information on contexts of care, child outcome(s), and key
findings. This provided a further opportunity to appraise the body of
data, with a view to generate insights from global exemplars in the
literature.
CE, cognitive and educational development; PH, physical health; SB, socio-emotional and behavioral health.
Children resided with grandparents SB
exclusively for at least three
months
733 grandmothers (NIMH
study); 9878 caregivers (2001
National Health Interview
Survey) and children, 4–17 yr
Cross-sectional analysis of
custodial grandchildren's risk of
emotional and behavioral
problems compared with peers
United States
2.3. Data analysis
3. Results
3.1. The global evidence base on types of grandparental care
Our search captured 206 publications (Table 1). As expected, this
body of work included studies of skipped-generation families, where
grandparents were directly responsible for the day-to-day care of the
child (denoted C for grandparent custodial care, n = 35); multigenerational families, where grandparents and parents were caregivers
together (denoted MG for multigenerational care, n = 154); and both
types of care (denoted C & MG, n = 17). We identified some ambiguity
in a handful of studies: we included, in the category of custodial care,
works specifying that grandparents were primarily responsible for the
child while providing no information on residence, and included, in the
category of multigenerational care, non-cohabitating grandparents who
had regular contact with the child. The distribution of studies was as
a
Children resided with grandparents SB
exclusively for at least three
months, and participating families
identified as White or Black
733 grandmothers and their
grandchildren, 3 mo–16 yr, with
the children's parents absent for
3+ months
Cross-sectional analysis of an
adaptation of the Family Stress
Model
PH; SB
grandmother coping resources have
indirect effects (through ineffective
parenting)
Adjustment
Dysfunctional parenting mediates the
effect of grandmothers' distress on
grandchildren's adjustment,
especially with regard to
externalizing behaviors
Emotional & behavioral challenges Custodial grandchildren fare worse
than others across all domains of
emotional and behavioral challenges
measured by the Strengths and
Difficulties Questionnaire
Physical health condition; mental Children in custodial grandmother
health condition
care have better health outcomes,
but physical and mental health
problems remain high; these children
are also more likely to have a
limiting condition than many peers
status, education, residential
locale, work status, and income
United States
Table 2 (continued)
Sample characteristics
Context of care
Study details
Country
Outcome
categorya
Outcome(s)
Key findings
Reference
Smith et al., 2008
A.F.A. Sadruddin, et al.
18
Study details
Sample characteristics
Context of care
Outcome
categoryb
Outcome(s)
Main findings
Reference
Australia
Cross-sectional analysis of the
intergenerational transmission of
dietary behaviors
114 members of 27 threegeneration families of Anglo-,
Chinese- and Italian-Australian
descent
Grandmothers have much influence
on the diets of grandchildren in some
cultural contexts
PH
Eating behaviors
Rhodes et al., 2016
Bangladesh
Cross-sectional analysis of the
effect of maternal mortality and
adoption on child survival
Grandmothers, more so than other
family members, likely ensure
adequate care of grandchildren
PH
Mortality
Brazil
Longitudinal study of the influence
of grandmothers on breastfeeding
practices
All available records of children
born shortly before their mothers'
death and children born
immediately before the last child
born before their mothers' death,
from 1974 to 2005
601 mothers who gave birth to
healthy babies at a university
general hospital in Porto Alegre
Regardless of cultural context,
grandmothers (and mothers) exert a
great deal of influence over family
food choice and share a bi-directional
relationship with grandchildren that
skips the parent generation
The probability of survival for
children is much higher if they stay in
their own household and a
grandmother is present
Grandmothers may contribute to suboptimal infant feeding practices
through advice given to new mothers
about the use of other liquids or milks
PH
Infant feeding
practices
Susin et al., 2005
Brazil & Peru
Cross-sectional analysis of the
effects of the presence of a
grandparent on children's
wellbeing
Cross-sectional analysis of the
effect of grandparental support on
adolescents depression
19,285 individuals living in 3623
households in Brazil, and 19,042
individuals living in 3585
households in Peru
62 adolescents, mean age 14.2 yr,
and their parents and grandparents
PH; CE
Height; academic
performance
SB
Depressive symptoms
Adolescents exposed to harsh
parenting practices have lower levels
of depression when they have
supportive grandparents
Botcheva and Feldman,
2004
Cameroon
Cross-sectional analysis of
adolescent sexual behavior
671 youths living in Bemenda
Comparison of children living with a
grandparent in the household and
those without the presence of a
grandparent in the home
Parents and children lived with
grandparents during a prolonged
period of economic depression as a
result of a transition from a
centralized communist economy to
one of market-based capitalism;
economic stressors led to formation of
three-generation households
Adolescents living in different
household structures ranging from
high standard of living to poor
households
Mothers are less likely to exclusively
breastfeed in the first month if
grandmothers suggest the
introduction of water or tea, and in
the first six months if grandmothers
suggested other kinds of milk; daily
contact with the maternal
grandmother is a risk factor for
abandoning exclusive breastfeeding
Grandparent co-residence is
associated with decreased height for
age in Peru, but not in Brazil
SB
Sexual Behavior
Rwenge, 2000
Chile
Longitudinal study of the effect of
household membership transitions
on child vocabulary and behavior
15,175 children, 0–5 yr at initial
survey and 2 yr older at follow up,
from a nationally representative
sample
CE
Language
development
China
Longitudinal study of associations
between infant feeding preferences
in mothers' social networks and
rates of breastfeeding
1172 mother-infant dyads
recruited from four public
hospitals in Hong Kong
Reasons for co-residence with
grandparents in Chile include
decreasing marriage rates and
increasing teen fertility rates;
grandparent may provide care as a
transition to cohabitation of the
mother and father
Social networks play an important
role in supporting new mothers, and
grandparents occupy a space of
increased influence
Adolescents living with grandparents
are significantly less likely to be
sexually active and to have multiple
partners compared with those living
with their parents
Children who transition out of
grandparent co-residence have worse
vocabulary scores, but no significant
changes in behavior
PH
Infant feeding
practices
Bai et al., 2016
China & United
States
Cross-sectional analysis of crosscultural differences in grandparent
238 grandparent caregivers in the
United States and 106 in China
U.S. grandparents assume care of
children due to events such as
parental death, incarceration, or
SB
Adjustment
Relatively few maternal and paternal
grandparents support exclusive
breastfeeding, and living with a
paternal in-law is associated with risk
of early breastfeeding cessation
Chinese grandparents report greater
grandchild psychological dysfunction
than American grandparents, which
19
Country
Bulgaria
A.F.A. Sadruddin, et al.
Table 3
Studies of grandparent care in multi-generation families (n = 48, one exemplara per country or multi-country study).
Razzaque et al., 2014
Pérez et al., 2007
Reynolds et al., 2018
(continued on next page)
Social Science & Medicine 239 (2019) 112476
Wang et al., 2019
Country
Study details
Sample characteristics
caregiving and grandchild
adjustment
Context of care
Outcome
categoryb
Outcome(s)
divorce, while Chinese grandparents
become primary caregivers primarily
due to parents' migration for work
20
Cross-sectional analysis of the
effects of grandparental economic,
cultural, and social capital on child
educational attainment
2383 children participating in the
Danish Longitudinal Survey of
Youth
Grandparents' economic, cultural, and
social capital may exert unique effects
on grandchildren's development and
aspirations
CE
Choice of secondary
education
Ethiopia
Cross-sectional analysis of the
effect of kin presence on child
mortality and growth
Anthropometric and demographic
data for 700 children, ≤16 yr,
censuses in 1999 and 2003
PH
Growth, mortality
Europe & Israel
Cross-sectional analysis of the
effects of grandparental resources
on grandchild educational
attainment
24,447 individuals, 50+ yr,
participating in the Survey of
Health, Aging & Retirement in
Europe
Shifting marriage patterns in contexts
of chronic food and water insecurity
result in increasing rates of matrilocal
residence and access to maternal kin;
this increases access to two sets of
grandparents providing care
In welfare states, grandparental
resources may provide a substitute for
limited parental resources, buffering
educational, financial, and material
difficulties
CE
Educational
attainment
Finland
Cross-sectional analysis of the
effects of grandparental education
and SES on grandchild completion
of secondary education
70,845 individuals, 20 yr,
participating in the Finnish Growth
Environment Panel
Grandparents may influence
grandchildren's educational
attainment through resources,
positive influences of contact, or
access to resources in the extended
family network
CE
Educational
attainment
The Gambia
Longitudinal study of the effects of
living kin on child survivorship
All available records of births and
deaths from 1950 to 1974 in
western region villages
participating in medical surveys
Care and resources provided by
maternal kin in patrilineal and
patrilocal contexts with seasonal food
scarcity may provide a buffer that
supports child survival
PH
Mortality
Germany
Longitudinal study of the effects of
living near grandparents on infant
survival
Genealogies from German villages
from 1412 to 1912
Paternal and maternal grandparent
investment strategies may differ when
both live close to their grandchildren
PH
Mortality
Ghana
Cross-sectional analysis of the
effect of household structure on
timing of adolescents' sexual debut
2387 adolescents, 12–19 yr,
enrolled in the 2004 Adolescent
Survey
Co-residence with grandparents may
follow maternal divorce and lack of
household wealth
SB
Sexual behavior
Greece
Cross-sectional analysis of the
effect of demographic factors on
Representative sample of 729
children, aged 9–13 yr
Grandparents in this context may
have experienced hunger and
PH
Overweight & obesity
may be due to greater use of an
authoritative parenting style and
cultural differences related to the
stigma of being raised by a
grandparent
Grandparents' economic and social
capital have no direct effects on
grandchildren's choice of secondary
education, but grandchildren of those
with more cultural capital are more
likely to enroll in academically
orientated tracks
Living with a grandmother has a
positive effect on child survival;
specific height benefits are observed
when children live with maternal
grandmothers
Higher grandparental education and
financial resources are positively
associated with grandchild
educational attainment, providing
some buffering of limited parental
education and financial resources
Grandparents' educational attainment
and SES have limited effects on
grandchildren's educational
attainment; contact with maternal
grandmothers increases
grandchildren's educational
achievement, particularly in lowincome families, and paternal
grandmothers provide access to
resources in extended family
networks
Children without living maternal
grandmothers have lower survival
rates than those with living maternal
grandmothers, but the presence or
absence of all other grandparents has
no effect
Maternal grandparental proximity
has no effect on child survival but
paternal grandmother proximity
exerts protective effects through 12
months, while paternal grandfather
proximity exerts a negative effect
Adolescents living with grandparents
have earlier sexual debut than those
living with parents, partially due to
parental monitoring and household
wealth
Having a maternal grandmother as
the primary caregiver is associated
Reference
Møllegaard and Jæger,
2015
Gibson and Mace, 2005
Deindl and Tieben, 2017
Lehti et al., 2019
Sear et al., 2002
Kemkes-Grottenthaler,
2005
Tenkorang and Adjei,
2015
Moschonis et al., 2010
(continued on next page)
Social Science & Medicine 239 (2019) 112476
Denmark
Main findings
A.F.A. Sadruddin, et al.
Table 3 (continued)
Country
Study details
Sample characteristics
prevalence of childhood
overweight and obesity
Guatemala
Cross-sectional analysis of the
effects of grandparent contact and
investment on child health
2892 mothers and 3370 children
enrolled in the Guatemalan Survey
of Family Health
Hungary
Cross-sectional analysis the effect
of grandparental attitudes on
physical activity
509 children, 10–14 yr, their
parents and grandparents
India
Cross-sectional analysis of the
effect of child care strategy on
child health and nutritional status
920 children, 1–3 yr, living in periurban Punjab
Indonesia
Descriptive retrospective
secondary analysis of a quasiexperimental study promoting
exclusive breastfeeding
Longitudinal study of the effects of
maternal employment and child
care strategy in infancy on
children's non-cognitive skills
Cross-sectional analysis of
emotional closeness to
grandparents and adolescent
emotional and behavioral
difficulties
163 mother-infant dyads and the
infants' grandmothers
Ireland
21
Israel
11,314 children, assessed at 9 mo
and at 3 yr, whose families
participated in the infant cohort of
the Growing Up in Ireland study
2751 Arab and Jewish middle- and
high-school students, 12–18 yr,
grades 7–11
Context of care
difficulties finding food as children
and may overfeed grandchildren
despite changes in food availability
Guatemala is one of the poorest
countries in the world and
grandparents may provide financial
assistance and personal support to
mothers and children
Grandparents may contribute to
physical and mental health of
grandchildren when parents work
extend hours or multiple jobs
Working mothers may use different
childcare strategies (i.e.,
grandmothers, siblings, etc.) that have
implications for children's health
Early breastfeeding rates are below
target rates in Indonesia and
grandmothers may improve rates
through support of mothers
Low SES families are more likely to
depend on forms of unpaid child care,
such as grandparents
Outcome
categoryb
Outcome(s)
PH
Height for age
PH
Physical activity
PH
Height for age, weight
for age
PH
Infant feeding
practices
SB
Emotional &
behavioral challenges
Grandparents increasingly care for
children in contexts with high rates of
dual-parent employment; the effects
of grandparents on adolescent
wellbeing may vary by cultural
context
SB
Adjustment, prosocial
behavior
43,046 children born in 2001,
followed from 2.5 to 13 yr, with
families participating in the
Longitudinal Survey of Newborns
in the 21st Century
Grandparents may exert unique
effects on grandchild obesity risk,
which may change as children age
and spend less time at home
PH
Overweight & obesity
Kenya
Cross-sectional analysis of an
intervention using dialogue-based
groups to promote optimal infant
feeding practices
Cross-sectional analysis of the
association between grandmother
co-residence and child school
enrollment
509 mothers, fathers, and
grandmothers participating in the
intervention
PH
Infant feeding
practices
CE
School enrollment
Cross-sectional analysis of
proximity to matrilineal kin on
child mortality
1635 children from two villages
located by Lake Malawi in the
southern region of the country
Inventions targeting grandparents and
fathers may improve optimal
breastfeeding rates in a context with
high rates of child malnutrition
High rates of HIV prevalence result in
a high percentage of children living
with the extended family; children
live with grandmothers in cases of
mothers dying or being unaffiliated
with the household
Women living close to matrilineal
grandparents may have increased
opportunities for help and other
resources
PH
Mortality
Malawi
Mexico
PH
Having a living paternal grandmother
is negatively associated with height,
while contact with maternal
grandparents is weakly associated
with height for age
Grandparents contribute to the
development of healthy attitudes
toward physical activity and activity
patterns of grandchildren
Children of working mothers cared
for by grandparents have better
outcomes than those in other child
care types (siblings and other adults)
Lack of grandmother support is
associated with shortened early
breastfeeding; grandmothers tend to
promote introduction of other foods
Unpaid grandparent childcare during
infancy is associated with higher rates
of emotional and behavioral
challenges in children at 3 years
Emotional closeness to grandparents
is associated with fewer emotional
symptoms and hyperactivity, and
increased rates of prosocial behavior;
the effect is greater in Israeli Arab
adolescents despite lower levels of
emotional closeness to grandparents
The effects of grandparent coresidence on risk of overweight and
obesity in grandchildren is apparent
at age 5.5 years, with highest
likelihood of obesity at ages 10 and
13 for boys, and at age 11 for girls
Interventions that improve
grandmothers' knowledge of infant
feeding and encourages social support
improve some infant feeding practices
Children living with grandmothers
and mothers are as likely to be in
school; co-residence with a
grandmother increases likelihood of
school enrollment in orphans and
children with absent mothers
Presence of maternal grandmothers is
associated with higher mortality
rates; presence of local paternal
grandmothers is weakly protective,
compared to paternal grandmothers
living in another village
Sheppard and Sear, 2016
Lakó, 2014
Gurupdesh et al., 2013
Susiloretni et al., 2015
McDonnell, 2016
Attar-Schwartz and
Khoury-Kassabri, 2016
Ikeda et al., 2017
Mukuria et al., 2016
Parker and Short, 2009
Sear, 2008
Schmeer, 2013
(continued on next page)
Social Science & Medicine 239 (2019) 112476
Longitudinal study of the effect of
household composition on rates of
overweight and obesity of children
10,641 children, 6–16 yr,
participating in the Lesotho
Demographic and Health Survey
Reference
with higher odds of overweight or
obesity
Japan
Lesotho
Main findings
A.F.A. Sadruddin, et al.
Table 3 (continued)
Country
Outcome(s)
Main findings
Iron-deficiency
anemia
Co-resident grandmothers are
associated with reduced rates of child
anemia, independent of changes in
family structure of parents
PH
Infant feeding
practices
CE
Educational
attainment
PH
Infant feeding
practices
SB
Social skills
Rates of optimal breastfeeding
practices and correct timing of
introduction of complementary foods
and liquids are higher in households
with grandmothers with correct
knowledge of infant feeding practices
Effects of grandparental resources are
not significant after controlling for
parental characteristics; the effects
remain insignificant after including
measures of grandparental closeness
and involvement
Mothers and grandmothers employ
different methods of feeding infants
and young children, with mothers
more likely to use a bottle and
grandmothers more likely to hand- or
force-feed children; both groups
utilize cups, although mothers do this
more frequently, and the majority of
mothers believe force-feeding can be
dangerous; grandmothers note more
social support around hand feeding
The relationship between parental
authoritativeness and children's social
competence is moderated by
emotional closeness to grandparents
SB
Externalizing &
internalizing behavior
challenges, prosocial
behaviors, substance
use
Grandparent involvement is
positively associated with prosocial
behavior, but not with externalizing
and internalizing behavior
challenges, or with substance use
Profe and Wild, 2017
PH; SB
Growth; drinking
behavior, smoking
behavior
Ko, 2019
Co-resident grandmothers and
grandfathers who smoke may
influence the development of smoking
habits of grandchildren
SB
Smoking behavior
As the data are nationally
representative across multiple
countries, families live in an array of
CE
School enrollment
Grandparents may invest in
grandchildren in different ways;
grandmothers' pension income is
associated with granddaughters'
height and lower rates of drinking,
while grandfathers' pension income
was associated with decreased rates
of smoking
Living with a grandparent who
smokes reduces the likelihood of
grandchildren being non-smokers,
though the effect is stronger for those
who have parents who smoke
Grandparents over 60 yr have the
greatest impact on grandchildren's
schooling and grandmothers are
Context of care
Longitudinal study of the effect of
changes in family structure on
rates of child anemia
4649 children, 3–12 yr,
participating in the Mexico Family
Life Survey
Nepal
Cross-sectional analysis of the
effect of grandmothers'
breastfeeding knowledge on
mothers' infant feeding practices
1399 infants and toddlers,
16–24 mo, living with
grandparents
Co-resident grandmothers may have
beneficial effects on child nutrition
through their expanded social
networks or detrimental effects by
disrupting mothers' decision making
Grandparents knowledge of
breastfeeding may influence mothers'
feeding practices for their young
children
The Netherlands
Cross-sectional analysis of the
effects of grandparental education,
occupational status, and cultural
resources on grandchildren's
educational attainment
1540 children participating in the
Longitudinal Internet Studies for
Social Sciences survey
Nigeria
Cross-sectional analysis of the
methods used by mothers and
grandmothers to feed children
under 2 yr and the factors that
affect their choice of weaning
methods
240 mothers and 246
grandmothers of children under
2 yr in a southwest Nigeria town
Pakistan
Cross-sectional analysis of the
relationship between parenting
style and social competence, and
the moderating effect of emotional
closeness to grandparents
Cross-sectional analysis of the
effects of parental and
grandparental involvement on
adolescent mental health and
substance use
99 triads of mothers, fathers and
adolescent children, 13–18 yr, in
joint three-generation family
systems
South Korea
Cross-sectional and longitudinal
analyses of the effects of
grandparents' pensions on the
health of co-resident
grandchildren
759 children, in grades 4–6, living
with a relative participating in the
Korea Welfare Panel Study
Spain
Cross-sectional analysis of
associations between living with a
family member that smokes and
adolescent smoking
32,234 students, 14–18 yr, that
participated in the 2010 State
Survey on Drug Use in Secondary
School Students
Sub-Saharan
Africa
Cross-sectional analysis of the
association between children's
917,788 children, 7–15 yr, in
three-generation households
South Africa
512 students in grades 8 and 9,
mean age 14 yr, from metropolitan
Cape Town
Grandparents may contribute to the
educational attainment of
grandchildren through serval types of
resources, including their education,
occupational status, and cultural
resources
Igbo-Ora women are typically selfemployed, processing farm produce or
trading; they usually carry their
infants and young children with them
as they work, which can result in
extended breastfeeding, but women
must also travel to trade and do not
always bring their children with them
for this part of their work so they may
be away from home for days or weeks
at a time
Grandparents provide emotional
support to children living in threegeneration households
Apartheid-era policies and social
transformations, such as the HIV
epidemic and increasing participation
of women in the workforce, have
resulted in many three-generation
households
Grandfathers and grandmothers
invest resources in co-resident
grandchildren, particularly after an
old-age pension was introduced in
2007
Outcome
categoryb
Reference
Karmacharya et al., 2017
Bol and Kalmijn, 2016
Titiloye and Brieger,
2009
Akhtar et al., 2017
Escario and Wilkinson,
2015
Schrijner and Smits,
2018b
(continued on next page)
Social Science & Medicine 239 (2019) 112476
Sample characteristics
22
Study details
A.F.A. Sadruddin, et al.
Table 3 (continued)
Country
Study details
Sample characteristics
schooling and grandparent coresidence
Outcome
categoryb
Outcome(s)
settings under widely varying
circumstances
Academic
achievement
CE
Cognitive
development
PH
Height, weight
CE
Non-verbal
intelligence
SB
Sexual behavior
Children reside with at least one
grandparent and at least one parent in
the home
PH
Accidental injury
8250 mothers enrolled in the Early
Childhood Longitudinal Study, and
4053 mothers enrolled in the
Fragile Families and Child
Wellbeing Study
The relationship between grandparent
co-residence and breastfeeding
practices likely varies as a function of
the health of grandparents and the
socioeconomic status of the family
PH
Infant feeding
practices
1314 caregivers and 591 children,
12–16 yr
Extended household structures are
common in many low- and middleincome countries, and grandparents
may serve as either a risk or
protective factor for children
The effect of grandparent coresidence may vary in relation to
parents' age and marital status, as well
as cross-culturally
SB
Externalizing &
internalizing behavior
challenges
SB
Externalizing &
internalizing behavior
challenges
Taiwan
Cross-sectional analysis of
grandparental co-residence in
single-parent households and
children's cognitive development
Tanzania
Cross-sectional analysis of the
effects of father absence on food
security
3136 children, under 5 yr from 56
villages participating in the Whole
Village Project
Thailand
Cross-sectional analysis of the
effect of child rearing by
grandparents on child
development
320 children, 6–12 yr, from Phrae
province
Uganda
Longitudinal study of the effect of
household composition on early
sexual debut
1940 adolescent girls, 16–19 yr,
participating in the Rakai
Community Cohort Study
United Kingdom
Longitudinal study of the effects of
grandparent co-residence on child
household injuries
12,319 children, assessed at 9 mo
and 3 yr, from the Millennium
Cohort Study
United States
Longitudinal study of grandparent
co-residence and breastfeeding
initiation and duration
Vietnam
Cross-sectional analysis of risk
factors for poor child mental
health in a nationallyrepresentative epidemiological
sample
Cross-sectional analysis of
grandparent co-residence and
child mental health
23
Cross-sectional analysis of the
effect of grandparental wealth on
the educational achievement of
grandchildren
All available records of children in
grade 9 born from 1980 to 1996
with traceable grandparents and
whose information was included in
national registries
19,531 children in grade 7
participating in the Taiwan
Educational Panel Survey
4582 children from six western and
eastern European countries
participating in the School
Children Mental Health in Europe
survey
Even in egalitarian contexts such as
Sweden, wealth inequality within a
family may exert strong effects on
grandchildren's academic
achievement
The effects of grandparental coresidence on children's outcomes in
single-parent families may depend on
whether children live with their
mother or father
Grandparents may buffer child health
in developing contexts with high rates
of father absence, due to death or
parental separation
Children reside with grandparents
when parents primarily when parents
migrate for work, although a small
subset do so when a parent dies or
divorces or when co-residing parents
have no childcare role
Children reside within a variety of
household structures, including with
both parents or with a grandparent in
the household
Main findings
particularly important for
girls—especially those whose mothers
died or do not live in the home with
them—with regard to school
enrollment; however, the impact of
grandparents is less when
opportunities for schooling are
limited across the community
Grandparental wealth is associated
with children's grade point average in
grade 9; this is only partially
mediated by parental wealth and
socioeconomic characteristics
Grandparent co-residence is
positively associated with children's
cognitive scores; the effect is greater
for those living in single-father
families
Although children living apart from
their fathers have lower height-forage z-scores, this effect is attenuated
for children living with grandparents
Children cared for by grandparents
are two times more likely to have
delayed development than those with
parental care; access to basic needs
and services, and family income, are
related to development
Girls living with grandparents have
significantly higher odds of sexual
debut before age 16 compared with
those living with both biological
parents
Grandparent co-residence is
associated with lower probability of
child home injury, with stronger
effects for boys
Breastfeeding initiation is lower in
grandparent co-resident families in
the Fragile Families study, but not in
the nationally representative sample;
co-residence is associated with
reduced breastfeeding duration in
both samples
Grandparent co-residence is neither a
risk factor nor is it protective for child
mental health
Grandparent co-residence is
associated with increased risk of child
mental health problems in the total
sample and in two-parent homes; the
Reference
Hallsten and Pfeffer,
2017
Chen, 2016
Lawson et al., 2017
Nanthamongkolchai
et al., 2009
Pilgrim et al., 2014
Tanskanen and
Danielsbacka, 2017
Pilkauskas, 2014a
Weiss et al., 2014
Masfety et al., 2019
(continued on next page)
Social Science & Medicine 239 (2019) 112476
CE
Sweden
6 European
Countries
Context of care
A.F.A. Sadruddin, et al.
Table 3 (continued)
Social Science & Medicine 239 (2019) 112476
Academic
performance
CE
Economic and cultural context may
influence the effect of household
structure on children's academic
performance
Cross-sectional analysis of the
effect of father absence and
grandparent co-residence on child
cognitive and non-cognitive skills
Cross-sectional analysis of the
effect of household structure on
child academic performance
33 OECD
Countries
41 OECD
Countries
Cross-sectional and longitudinal
analyses of the associations
between obesity and family
structure
8 European
Countries
a
Where there were multiple studies per country, the selection of exemplar was based on study design (longitudinal, over cross-sectional) and largest sample size (capturing more diverse and/or nationally representative samples).
b
CE, cognitive and educational development; PH, physical health; SB, socio-emotional and behavioral health.
Chiu and McBride-Chang,
2010
Radl et al., 2017
Grandparent co-residence is
associated with adverse cognitive and
non-cognitive outcomes in almost all
33 OECD countries
Overall, children with no co-resident
grandparents have higher reading
scores than those who live with a
grandparent in the home; this effect is
weaker in collectivist societies
Locus of control;
academic performance
SB; CE
Formisano et al., 2014
PH
Extended household structures are
becoming more common in Europe,
creating opportunities for adults other
than parents to influence the health of
children
Children co-reside with grandparents
in cases of father absence
12,350 children, mean age 7.8 yr,
in the cross-sectional survey; 5236
children (a subset of the 12,350),
mean age 5.9 yr, in the
longitudinal analysis
259,652 children, 15–16 yr,
participating the in the 2012
Program for International Student
Assessment
193,841 students, 15 yr,
participating in the 2000 Program
for International Student
Assessment
BMI, sum of tricipital
& sub-scapular
skinfold thickness,
waist-to-height ratio
effect is not significant in singleparent homes
Children living with grandparents in
the household have significantly
higher BMI z-scores and waist-toheight ratios
Outcome
categoryb
Context of care
Sample characteristics
Study details
Country
Table 3 (continued)
Outcome(s)
Main findings
Reference
A.F.A. Sadruddin, et al.
follows: Africa (n = 17), Asia (n = 68), Australia (n = 3), Europe
(n = 32), Latin America (n = 12), Middle East (n = 2), and U.S.
(n = 60); we also captured multi-country studies (n = 12). Just over
two-thirds of studies were cross-sectional (n = 146, 71%); nearly all
others were longitudinal (n = 45), and a single study presented both
cross-sectional and longitudinal data (n = 1). The remaining few included randomized controlled trials (n = 6), case control studies
(n = 4), descriptive retrospective analyses (n = 3), and an ethnographic account (n = 1).
With regard to our first research question (how do grandparents
influence child health and development outcomes?), we found a heterogeneous body of work, both in terms of the indicators of grandparent
involvement and the mechanisms potentially involved. In terms of indicators, studies of "grandparent effects" included those that examined
staying in contact with grandchildren (e.g., data on co-residence or
frequency of visits), looking after grandchildren (e.g., data on caregiving behaviors such as bathing, feeding, educating, mentoring, and
picking up from school), and/or contributing financial support (e.g.,
data on school fees or household expenses).
The granularity of data permitted or constrained different types of
analyses. Some quantitative surveys, for example, examined grandparent effects at a gross, population level, in terms of the associations
between types of co-residence and child outcomes (e.g., Deleire and
Kalil, 2002): they primarily recorded co-residence data—whether or
not grandparents were present in multigenerational family structures.
Other surveys examined grandparent effects at the family level, providing data on caregiving roles and investment of resources. These
studies could focus attention on multiple indicators of grandparental
involvement (Thornberry et al., 2006), assess diverse pathways through
which grandparents influenced child outcomes (Xie et al., 2018), or
examine associations between child outcomes and different types of
grandparent caregiving behaviors, such as feeding, playing, and transporting (Liu et al., 2018). Thus, population-level and family-level approaches, drawing on macro- and micro-level data, have different ways
of operationalizing types of grandparent involvement and theorizing
the pathways through which grandparents exert an influence on their
grandchildren.
Cohort results often masked strong heterogeneities: the impacts of
grandparents differ significantly for advantaged and less-advantaged
households (Del Boca et al., 2018). They also reflected the structural
context of state policies. For example, one study on European countries
and Israel (Deindl and Tieben, 2017) was able to show, at population
level, that the magnitude of grandparent effects can differ with respect
to the nature of welfare states. Although grandparents buffer the lack of
parental resources in economically disadvantaged families, such effects
are attenuated in European states that can offer comprehensive welfare
provision to disadvantaged families.
Rare were the studies of multigenerational households that sought
to differentiate between "exposure effects" and "resource effects" of
grandparent involvement, or to differentiate between direct effects to
grandchildren and "buffer" effects via support to parents. For example,
one study (Lehti et al., 2019) sought to differentiate the legacy, stability, and kin keeper effects of grandparents on grandchildren reaching
secondary school. Using Finnish census data, this study tested whether
grandparents directly transferred resources across generations (legacy),
provided resources for the nuclear family in times of need (stability), or
kept families together in ways that benefited the children over a shared
lifetime.
Another study (Tanskanen and Danielsbacka, 2018) cautioned that
"grandparent effects" might even be confounded with a "grandchild
effect," since a test of causality, using longitudinal data from the British
Millennium Cohort Study, did not support the prediction that grandparental investments improved child wellbeing over time. Although
parent-grandparent contact frequency and grandparental financial
support were associated with improved cognitive and socio-emotional
outcomes for grandchildren, such results were based on between-person
24
Social Science & Medicine 239 (2019) 112476
A.F.A. Sadruddin, et al.
change that demonstrate that investments in caregiver-child relationships and early-life child outcomes strongly correlate with better laterlife outcomes, including children's future health, wealth, education, and
life choices (Tanskanen and Danielsbacka, 2018; Conti and Heckman,
2013).
associations and were not replicated in models that compared the same
individuals over time. It could thus be that grandparent-grandchild
effects result from the different characteristics of children, or their
households, rather than grandparental involvement, per se.
Some studies included families of non-cohabitating grandparents,
who provided daily care for their grandchildren. In the U.S. (e.g., Lau
et al., 2019), Chinese-American families have strong traditions of
multigenerational care, even with separate residences. In Australia
(Rogers et al., 2019), non-cohabitating grandparents were acting as the
main informal caregivers for grandchildren (specifically with respect to
feeding), whereas in Israel (Attar-Schwartz and Huri, 2019), grandparents were offering advice, counsel, and material support to their
grandchildren. Three studies that explicitly compared grandparent
custodial and multigenerational care were surveys from China (Liu
et al., 2018) and the U.S. (Musil et al., 2018; Pittman and Boswell,
2007). For example, the three-city study by Pittman and Boswell (2007)
included custodial, non-cohabitating and co-residing grandmothers, to
examine child outcomes by residential status and levels of caretaking
responsibility, for low-income and minority population groups.
3.2.2. Global studies of grandparent custodial care
To provide more descriptive and interpretive insights into the range
of studies included in the global evidence base, we now focus attention
on custodial grandparents. Table 2 presents the evidence base (n = 35).
It shows a skewed global representation: 23 studies were conducted in
the U.S. (including 2 comparing samples in the U.S. with those in China
and South Africa, respectively), 5 studies were conducted in China, and
1 study per country was undertaken in Australia, Kenya, South Africa,
South Korea, Spain, Taiwan, and Thailand. In the U.S., grandparents
care for their grandchildren in response to high rates of parental incarceration, mental illness, drug use, and death (Campbell et al., 2006;
Edwards, 2006; Kelch-Oliver, 2011). It is important to note, however,
that U.S. research to date has predominantly focused on immigrant or
minority population groups (e.g., Somalis, Latinx, Hmong, or African
Americans) living in poor, urban neighborhoods. Similar findings, with
respect for the reasons why grandparents provide custodial care, are
reported in Australia, China, Kenya, South Africa, and Thailand, in
cases of parental illness, drug use, migration, and death due to HIV/
AIDS (Downie et al., 2010; Jia and Tian, 2010; Nanthamongkolchai
et al., 2011; Oburu, 2005; Sharer et al., 2015).
Studies reporting on children's physical health (n = 8), both within
and outside the U.S., demonstrated that children raised by custodial
grandparents presented poorer outcomes than those raised by their
parents. The 5 U.S. studies compared outcomes for grandchildren (9-to17 years old) living with grandparents vs. those living with married
parents from low-income Caucasian, minority (i.e., African-American)
or immigrant (i.e., non-white Hispanic) communities (Campbell et al.,
2006; Conway and Li, 2012; Nadorff and Patrick, 2018; Pilkauskas and
Dunifon, 2016; Ziol-Guest and Dunifon, 2014). The Thailand study focused on the nutritional status of children (6-to-12 years old) whose
parents immigrated from rural to urban areas (Nanthamongkolchai
et al., 2011). The China study reported pesticide poisoning for 1-to-14
year olds (Li et al., 2011), while the Taiwan study reported on rates of
HIV treatment adherence among adolescents (Xu et al., 2017).
Studies reporting on children's socio-emotional health (n = 30) examined outcomes such as emotional wellbeing, loneliness, externalizing
and internalizing behavior challenges, depressive symptoms, suicidal
tendencies, and anxiety. The results present a mixed picture.
Specifically, 4 studies of African-American children (3-to-16 years old),
living with grandparents in low-income, urban neighborhoods, recorded higher prevalence rates of juvenile reoffending, anxiety, depression, and adjustment difficulties (Campbell et al., 2006; Edwards,
2009; Kelch-Oliver, 2011; Poehlmann et al., 2008). Similar findings
were reported in China, for “left behind” children (8-to-14 years old),
who were 2.5 times more likely to suffer from loneliness and 6.4 times
more likely to feel very lonely (Jia and Tian, 2010). By contrast, one
U.S. study showed no negative outcomes in terms of psychological
wellbeing (Hayslip et al., 2014); a Kenyan study showed no adjustment
differences between children raised by grandparents and parents
(Oburu, 2005); and an Australian study noted that grandchildren living
with grandparents had better emotional wellbeing (Downie et al.,
2010).
All of the studies reporting on cognitive development (n = 5) showed
poor child outcomes, irrespective of age, but focused on families living
in socioeconomic adversity. For example, U.S. data from the Fragile
Families Child Wellbeing Study showed that grandchildren (age 9) who
were raised in custodial households repeated school grades more frequently, compared with grandchildren who were raised in nuclear
households (Pilkauskas and Dunifon, 2016). Also in the U.S., 7-to-12
year olds under custodial grandparent care were less likely to complete
3.2. The global evidence on links to child outcomes
With respect to our second question (what range of child outcomes
is reported globally?), we also found substantial heterogeneity in the
evidence base. Studies captured in this review more frequently assessed
children's physical health (n = 100) and socio-emotional and behavioral health (n = 91), as compared to the smaller body of published
work pertaining to children's cognitive and educational development
(n = 51); a number of studies reported multiple categories of outcomes.
Of course, the nature of the evidence base will reflect ease of measurement (although mortality and morbidity data are routinely available, there are many challenges inherent in gathering good-quality information on child educational or cognitive performance, especially in
low-income contexts) as well as policy concerns (e.g., a concern for
infant survival and nutrition vs. child or adolescent development).
3.2.1. Randomized controlled trials
We looked to randomized controlled trials to draw potential insights
regarding the effectiveness of interventions that involve grandparents
in caregiving practices. In Brazil, two clinical trials focused on counseling sessions to promote exclusive breastfeeding and reduce pacifier
use in the first 6 months of life, showing positive effects among adolescent mothers cohabitating with maternal grandmothers (Giugliani
et al., 2019; Nunes et al., 2011). In the U.S., an intervention study
evaluated the efficacy of a home-based, videotape intervention to delay
the early introduction of infant complementary foods; a home visitor
used the videotape to stimulate discussion about infant feeding and
mother-grandmother negotiation skills, such that first-time, adolescent,
African-American mothers were able to resist grandmothers' pressures
to start complementary feeding (Black et al., 2001). One education
program was introduced in an obstetrics clinic to teach "Back to Sleep"
messages about safe sleep positions to African-American grandmothers
and other senior caregivers, as a means to reduce the risk of Sudden
Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS); this trial targeted beliefs and preferences about sleep positions, but found no changes in rates of supine
sleep (Flick et al., 2001). Two U.S. trials involved custodial grandparents: a small-scale training program to improve attachment and
child behavior problems was delivered to grandmothers and greatgrandmothers in a neighborhood library (N’Zi et al., 2016), and a largescale trial compared the relative efficacy of behavioral parent training,
cognitive behavioral therapy, and information-only interventions with
respect to grandparenting practices and grandchildren's psychological
difficulties (Smith et al., 2018).
We see that intervention studies largely target specific caregiverchild interactions and/or caregiver beliefs related to infant health, in
clinic, home, or community settings. This is consistent with theories of
25
Social Science & Medicine 239 (2019) 112476
A.F.A. Sadruddin, et al.
with grandparents strengthened grandchildren's communication skills
(Cruise and O'Reilly, 2014), language development skills (Reynolds
et al., 2018), and overall educational attainment (Deindl and Tieben,
2017; Perry, 2017). For example, a cross-sectional study conducted
among 11,914 students in seventh grade in Taiwan reported that the
children living in households with long-term grandparental co-residence received the highest test scores, as compared to those who
transitioned out of co-resident households (Pong and Chen, 2010). In
terms of specific measures, many studies focused on cognitive ability,
language development, and/or problem solving skills. By contrast, the
studies in sub-Saharan Africa assessed school enrollment only (Parker
and Short, 2009; Schrijner and Smits, 2018), reporting that children
living with their mothers and grandmothers were more likely to enroll,
but offering no data on educational performance.
high school and to enroll in and complete college (Monserud and Elder,
2011), while 2-to-4 year olds lagged behind their peers in outcomes
associated with academic achievement (Pittman and Boswell, 2007),
and 12-to-18-year-old African-American children were more likely to
experience challenges in school (Campbell et al., 2006). Whereas studies in the U.S. focused on educational outcomes, the one study in
Thailand examined cognitive development, finding that 6-to-12 year
olds raised by grandparents in low-income families were more likely to
have below-normal development compared with peers raised by their
parents (Nanthamongkolchai et al., 2011).
3.2.3. Global studies of multigenerational care
By contrast, research focusing on multigenerational care is geographically diverse. Our exemplars (Table 3), selected to illustrate the
global scope of the literature, encompass work in Australia, Bangladesh,
Brazil, Bulgaria, Cameroon, Chile, China, Denmark, Ethiopia, Finland,
The Gambia, Germany, Ghana, Greece, Guatemala, Hungary, India,
Indonesia, Ireland, Israel, Japan, Kenya, Lesotho, Malawi, Mexico,
Nepal, the Netherlands, Nigeria, Pakistan, South Africa, South Korea,
Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, Tanzania, Thailand, Uganda, the U.K. (as well
as England specifically), the U.S., Vietnam, and multi-country groupings. Below, we map the global evidence, with a selection of cases from
Table 1 and Table 3.
The literature shows a considerable range of findings for children's
physical health outcomes, which include: birth weight, infant feeding
practices and sleeping positions, growth and developmental status,
accidental injury, health conditions, mortality, physical activity, child
eating behaviors and obesity. Studies conducted in Australia (Rogers
et al., 2019), Brazil (Nunes et al., 2011), China (Li and Liu, 2019),
Ethiopia (Gibson and Mace, 2005), The Gambia (Sear et al., 2002), and
the U.K. (Tanskanen and Danielsbacka, 2017) showed positive effects
on grandchildren's survival, height, weight, and protection from physical injury in the home. By contrast, studies in Japan (Sata et al.,
2015), Sweden (Lindberg et al., 2016), Thailand (Nanthamongkolchai
et al., 2009), and the U.S. (Krueger et al., 2015) showed that grandchildren co-residing with grandparents had higher BMI, delayed physical development, and decreased physical function. Studies in six different African countries reported on children's physical health
outcomes: growth, mortality, birth weight, and stunting (Cunningham
et al., 2010; Gibson and Mace, 2005; Kerr et al., 2007; Schrijner and
Smits, 2018; Sear et al., 2002; Titiloye and Brieger, 2009). Such diverse
results, in comparison to the physical health findings reported for
children raised by custodial grandparents, may be due to sampling
biases, given that the custodial grandparent families are often the most
socio-economically vulnerable in a population.
The evidence for children's socio-emotional health outcomes in multigenerational families is also mixed (as was the case for children living
with custodial grandparents). In countries such as Bulgaria (Botcheva
and Feldman, 2004), India (Renny and Jayasankara, 2016), and South
Africa (Profe and Wild, 2017), co-residence with grandparents was
associated with lower rates of depression, higher emotional intelligence
scores, and heightened pro-social behaviors. In Ghana, children living
with their grandparents as well as their parents were more prone to
engaging in sexual intercourse at an earlier age, due to less stringent
monitoring of behavior (Tenkorang and Adjei, 2015). One study in
Pakistan noted that grandparental presence in the home moderated the
relationship between parental authoritativeness and grandchildren's
social competence (Akhtar et al., 2017). It is certainly difficult to draw
firm conclusions regarding causal relationships between household
composition and child outcomes, from either cross-sectional (Masfety
et al., 2019) or longitudinal (Tanskanen and Danielsbacka, 2018) studies, or to know whether associations are due to changes in family
stress or to sampling biases, given that decisions to live in three-generation households may be contingent on whether caregivers must take
care of relatively easy vs. more challenging children.
In terms of cognitive development, studies showed that co-residence
4. Discussion
This study provides a global, comprehensive review of the links
between grandparental care and grandchildren's health and development. Previous systematic reviews on this topic have been limited in
scope: one reported on physical health outcomes in multigenerational
families, excluding custodial grandparents (Pulgaron et al., 2016),
while three other systematic reviews focused exclusively on breastfeeding (Negin et al., 2016), child dietary outcomes (Young et al.,
2018), or long-term cancer risk factors (Chambers et al., 2017). Given
the comprehensive scope of this review, we found a heterogeneous
body of work—in terms of indicators, mechanisms, and outcomes—characterizing the literature in skipped-generation and multigenerational families. We identify two important issues in the literature: a limited conceptual attention to operationalizing the diverse
ways in which grandparents are involved in the lives of their grandchildren, and a limited attention to contextual variables that might
influence pathways of care. Both issues contribute to research gaps in
the evidence base and to the mixed results we see in the extant literature, with regard to child outcomes.
In response to such research gaps, we present a conceptual framework to help operationalize the parameters of grandparental involvement and to explicitly conceptualize the pathways of care (Fig. 2). The
left panel focuses attention on types of care. It brings descriptive and
analytical attention to grandparent custodial and multigenerational
care in skipped-generation and extended families, which characterizes
an important heterogeneity in the evidence base. We differentiated
three indicators to measure the influence of grandparents: their contact
with the grandchildren, their caregiving behaviors, and their support in
terms of resources. These indicators are not always explicit in current
literature, and need to be unambiguously reported in forthcoming
work. The middle panel describes contexts of care. These are intervening
variables that potentially influence caregiver roles and impacts—including interpersonal relationships and structural contexts—guiding understanding of pathways of care in terms of who does
what, for whom, when, how, and why. In studies to date, the variables
pertinent to interpersonal contexts include the caregiving circumstances dictated by age or health (of the child or grandparent), the
cultural importance of child-rearing practices (influencing amount,
quality and regularity of care), the caregiving relationships (parent
relationship status, quality of parenting relationship), and other variables providing opportunities or barriers to grandparental involvement.
For their part, variables pertinent to social and structural contexts help
examine the salience of variables such as race and class, age and health,
and neighborhood and geographical place, as well as situations of
conflict, separation, or crisis. This attention to context helps us document the web of caregiving relationships that may involve mothers,
fathers, grandparents, friends, neighbors, siblings, other relatives or
paid caregivers, in a wider "community of care". This term was coined
to encourage the research and policy communities to take seriously
those parenting practices that extend beyond mother-child dyads
26
Social Science & Medicine 239 (2019) 112476
A.F.A. Sadruddin, et al.
Fig. 2. Pathways of care – A conceptual model of the links between grandparent involvement and child outcomes to guide research and policy.
regarding ways to reach out to grandparents, leverage their roles in
caregiving, and offer a range of services and programs to support them.
For example, financial assistance, health, education or housing support,
are ways in which policies can better support family-level care (Black
et al., 2001; Pilkauskas, 2012; Pilkauskas and Cross, 2018), while
specific interventions can be designed to support parenting behavior
and to promote family-level resilience (Kelch-Oliver, 2011). Such initiatives help to provide concrete options for integrating grandparents
in policy discussions regarding how families care for the next generation. Importantly, evaluation research is needed on specific interventions, regarding the identification of critical points of engagement with
caregivers, how we might strategically engage with the wider community of care (parents, grandparents, and other significant actors in
children's lives), and how we systematically evaluate their participation
and impacts.
(Panter-Brick et al., 2014). Importantly, attention to context also helps
us to think about the moderators potentially influencing associations
with child health. Finally, the right panel directs our attention to outcomes. Here we consider what impacts are being measured and reported,
asking for robust, concrete evidence on the extent to which grandparental care influences child health and development. Our conceptual
framework thus identifies modalities of care, contexts in which grandparents are involved, and key outcomes for grandchildren.
An explicit conceptual framework is needed to generate more specific research hypotheses regarding impacts on health and development, and to carefully describe what variables, including mediators and
moderators, will drive variation in outcomes within and between populations. Empirical studies to date have often concluded that the exact
pathways by which the influence of grandparents is exerted are still
unclear, and this is because of data limitations (Dunifon and KowaleskiJones, 2007, pp.478–479). For example, there may be direct influences
due to help with caregiving, discipline, or cognitive stimulation in the
home; there may be transfers of resource, changing the amount of income available in the household, entailing changes in child nutrition or
education; and there may be indirect advice or interference with
parent-child interactions, which may decrease or add to family stress.
Such pathways will vary according to contexts—specifically, the age of
the child, the health of the grandparent, socioeconomic status, race,
and/or crises of separation, incarceration, migration or conflict. We
draw attention to the need for more robust data on three indicators of
caregiver involvement—contact, behavior, and support—and a careful
description of structural and interpersonal contexts in caregiving research.
The framework also speaks to the issue of guiding policy decisions,
4.1. Recommendations for research and policy
We began this review to map the global evidence base in order to
emphasize the need for developing a more robust approach to understanding grandparent care. We conclude with a call for stronger theory,
with respect to hypotheses and analysis, because a lack of attention to
indicators, contexts and moderators is one of the reasons why the
current evidence base lacks rigor. Moving forward, we need to be more
attentive to risk of bias coming from studies with small sample sizes,
reporting on high-risk populations only, with low-quality methodology
and short evaluation time frames. Future research will also need to
robustly evaluate caregiving interventions, in terms of reach, cost-effectiveness, scale-up, and sustainability, and in ways that both help
27
Social Science & Medicine 239 (2019) 112476
A.F.A. Sadruddin, et al.
raising grandchildren, mainly due to the opioid crisis. Key interventions
include providing grandparents with information about how to navigate the school system, offering grandparents and grandchildren access
to mental health services, and building social and support networks in
affected communities (United States Senate, 2018). In the U.K., workschedule and childcare-tax allowances can afford grandparents more
flexibility to participate in their grandchildren's social and cognitive
development, especially when parents are unable to fulfill caregiving
roles (Fergusson et al., 2008; Lussier et al., 2002). In low- and middleincome countries, and in contexts of fragility (e.g., forced migration,
extreme poverty), policy initiatives for grandparental care are non-existent, or emergent at best. There is certainly room for improvement
with respect to the kind of support provided to grandparent caregivers.
children thrive and promote family-level resilience (Britto et al., 2017;
Conti and Heckman, 2013; Panter-Brick et al., 2014). Before this can be
done, we need to better identify some of the ways in which grandparents can be involved and supported. This will require drawing upon
comprehensive frameworks to generate specific hypotheses, at the population level and/or the family level, regarding the ecological, structural, and cultural drivers of care.
Our global review does provide some examples of concrete recommendations to improve research design and policy implications. In
the U.S., scholars have called for more comparative and longitudinal
work that assesses the health and wellbeing of children raised by
grandparents and biological parents, among different socioeconomic,
ethnic, and age groups, as well as across geographic locales (Areba
et al., 2018; Pilkauskas and Dunifon, 2016; Ziol-Guest and Dunifon,
2014). Other scholars have recommended adopting approaches to
strengthen networks of support within and outside the home, paying
attention to co-parenting and involving other members of the community, including teachers or counselors in schools and places of
worship. For example, Kelch-Oliver (2011) called for practitioners
working with grandparent-headed families to adopt a “strengths-based
approach” as a way of understanding how grandchildren adjust to
living with their grandparents (p.403). It also recommended that future
programs involve school counselors to emphasize established coping
strategies, and the ways grandchildren maintain bonds with their extended family. In another U.S.-based study, Smith et al. (2015) suggested that taking a family-based approach can further strengthen
programs and policies that are focused on improving the health and
wellbeing of grandparents and grandchildren who are under their care.
Outside the U.S., we also see a few examples of recommendations explicitly addressing grandparent-grandchild interactions. One study in
Chile advocated that policy makers look for ways to involve grandparents in interventions when grandchildren transition out of their care
(Reynolds et al., 2018). In the U.K., the Fatherhood Institute has produced regular reports, toolkits, and policy recommendations for engaging with a wider range of caregivers who provide support to a growing
child.
Our knowledge of how policies can effectively support grandparents
yet remains limited. Current recommendations are useful, but generic.
Grandparents remain largely invisible with respect to policy design,
implementation, and evaluation of care: they are rarely integrated in
the design or implementation of legal frameworks and service delivery,
and seldom included in robust program impact evaluations. Policies on
caregiving have often reflected, and perpetuated, structural and cultural biases that prevail in the realm of social welfare, income support,
housing or school assistance. In terms of engaging with fathers, for
example, gender biases have tended to reproduce a mothering, rather
than fathering, model of childrearing (Panter-Brick et al., 2014). In
terms of engaging with grandparents, similar biases prevail. For example, grandfathers are often presented in a more negative light, as
compared to grandmothers (Bates and Taylor, 2013; Buchanan and
Rotkirch, 2016; Bullock, 2007). Such biases counter efforts to understand what happens within families in everyday life and what might
boost resilience in times of economic crisis, separation, or conflict.
Evidence from recent policy reports published by Zero to Three and
the World Bank, emphasize that “grandparents are helping to build the
brains of … young children” (Kisner et al., 2017, p.15), and that human
development issues need to be brought to light in the context of families
experiencing economic crisis (Lundberg and Wuermli, 2012, p.8). Initiatives to support grandparents, especially those providing custodial
care, include targeted financial assistance, special types of insurance,
housing support, and facilitated school enrollment (Baker et al., 2008;
Minkler, 1999; Smith and Beitranm, 2003). In the U.S., the need for
targeted assistance has been recognized by the federal government: the
Supporting Grandparents Raising Grandchildren Act was signed into law in
2018, to create a task force in charge of developing and disseminating
information to help the estimated 2.6 million grandparents who are
5. Conclusion
Our review identified two main issues leading to the heterogeneity
in the evidence base: operationalizing indicators of grandparent involvement and theorizing the mechanisms potentially involved. There
is a need for well-informed research and policy decisions to support
grandparents and the children under their care. We present a conceptual framework to better measure and theorize pathways of care,
with a view to inform research design and policy implications.
Acknowledgments
Two co-authors received funding support for research time from the
Jacobs Foundation, Switzerland, fellowship number 2015 1170 11,
which was not involved in the design, conduct, or write-up of our research. We report no conflicts of interest. We thank Onyx Bruner and
Jannik Eggerman for their assistance with the Covidence database for
this systematic review.
Appendix A. Supplementary data
Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112476.
References
Akhtar, P., Malik, J., Begeer, S., 2017. The grandparents' influence: parenting styles and
social competence among children of joint families. J. Child Fam. Stud. 26, 603–611.
Amorim, M., Dunifon, R., Pilkauskas, N., 2017. The magnitude and timing of grandparental coresidence during childhood in the United States. Demogr. Res. 37,
1695–1706.
Areba, E.M., Eisenberg, M.E., McMorris, B.J., 2018. Relationships between family structure, adolescent health status and substance use: does ethnicity matter? J.
Community Psychol. 46, 44–57.
Arenas, E., 2017. Abuelos at home: differential impact on children's education by family
structure. Res. Soc. Stratif. Mobil. 52, 36–48.
Attar-Schwartz, S., Huri, Y., 2019. Grandparental support and life satisfaction among
adolescents in residential care. Child. Youth Serv. Rev. 96, 70–78.
Attar-Schwartz, S., Khoury-Kassabri, M., 2016. The moderating role of cultural affiliation
in the link between emotional closeness to grandparents and adolescent adjustment
difficulties and prosocial behavior. Am. J. Orthopsychiatry 86, 564–572.
Augustine, J.M., Raley, R.K., 2013. Multigenerational: households and the school readiness of children born to unmarried mothers. J. Fam. Issues 34, 431–459.
Bai, D.L., Fong, D.Y., Lok, K.Y., Tarrant, M., 2016. Relationship between the infant
feeding preferences of Chinese mothers' immediate social network and early breastfeeding cessation. J. Hum. Lactation 32, 301–308.
Baker, L., Silverstein, M., Putney, N., 2008. Grandparents raising grandchildren in the
United States: changing family forms, stagnant policies. J. Soc. Policy Soc. 7, 53–69.
Bates, J.S., Taylor, A.C., 2013. Grandfather involvement: contact frequency, participation
in activities, and commitment. J. Men's Stud. 21, 305–322.
Bentley, G., Mace, R., 2012. Substitute Parents: Biological and Social Perspectives on
Alloparenting in Human Societies. Berghahn Books.
Bernie, K., 2013. The factors influencing young mothers' infant feeding decisions: the
views of healthcare professionals and voluntary workers on the role of the baby's
maternal grandmother. Breastfeed. Med. 9, 161–165.
Bishai, D., Trevitt, J.L., Zhang, Y., McKenzie, L.B., Leventhal, T., Gielen, A.C., et al., 2008.
Risk factors for unintentional injuries in children: are grandparents protective?
Pediatrics 122, e980–987.
Black, M., Siegel, E., Abel, Y., Bentley, M., 2001. Home and videotape intervention delays
28
Social Science & Medicine 239 (2019) 112476
A.F.A. Sadruddin, et al.
early complementary feeding among adolescent mothers. Pediatrics 107, 1–8.
Black, M.M., Papas, M.A., Hussey, J.M., Hunter, W., Dubowitz, H., Kotch, J.B., et al.,
2002. Behavior and development of preschool children born to adolescent mothers:
risk and 3-generation households. Pediatrics 109, 573–580.
Bledsoe, C., Isiugo-Abanihe, U., 1989. Strategies of child fosterage among Mende grannies
in Sierra Leone. In: Lesthaeghe, R.J. (Ed.), Reproduction and Social Organization in
Sub-Saharan Africa. University of California Press, Berkeley.
Bol, T., Kalmijn, M., 2016. Grandparents' resources and grandchildren's schooling: does
grandparental involvement moderate the grandparent effect? Soc. Sci. Res. 55,
155–170.
Botcheva, L.B., Feldman, S.S., 2004. Grandparents as family stabilizers during economic
hardship in Bulgaria. Int. J. Psychol. 39, 157–168.
Brenner, R.A., Simons-Morton, B.G., Bhaskar, B., Das, A., Clemens, J.D., 2001. Prevalence
and predictors of immunization among inner-city infants: a birth cohort study.
Pediatrics 108, 661–670.
Britto, P.R., Lye, S.J., Proulx, K., Yousafzai, A.K., Matthews, S.G., Vaivada, T., et al., 2017.
Nurturing care: promoting early childhood development. The Lancet 389, 91–102.
Brook, J.S., Whiteman, M., Zheng, L., 2002. Intergenerational transmission of risks for
problem behavior. J. Abnorm. Child Psychol. 30, 65–76.
Bruederle, A., Delany-Moretlwe, S., Mmari, K., Brahmbhatt, H., 2019. Social support and
its effects on adolescent sexual risk taking: a look at vulnerable populations in
Baltimore and Johannesburg. J. Adolesc. Health 64, 56–62.
Buchanan, A., Rotkirch, A., 2016. Grandfathers: Global Perspectives. Palgrave Macmillan.
Bullock, K., 2007. Grandfathers raising grandchildren. J. Health Soc. Policy 22, 181–197.
Campbell, L., Hu, J., Oberle, S., 2006. Factors associated with future offending: comparing youth in grandparent-headed homes with those in parent-headed homes. Arch.
Psychiatr. Nurs. 20, 258–267.
Chambers, S., Rowa-Dewar, N., Radley, A., Dobbie, F., 2017. A systematic review of
grandparents' influence on grandchildren's cancer risk factors. PLoS One 12, 1–28.
Chan, K.L., Chen, M., Chen, Q., Ip, P., 2017. Can family structure and social support
reduce the impact of child victimization on health-related quality of life? Child Abuse
Negl. 72, 66–74.
Chaudhry, A.G., Ahmed, A., Hussain, S., Ali, N., Batool, A., 2014. An anthropological
study of breastfeeding practices and prevalence of supported liquids among childbearing women in rural Gujrat. Sci. Int. 26, 483–487.
Chen, W.-C., 2016. The role of grandparents in single-parent families in Taiwan. Marriage
Fam. Rev. 52, 41–63.
Chiang, Y.L., Park, H., 2015. Do grandparents matter? A multigenerational perspective on
educational attainment in Taiwan. Soc. Sci. Res. 51, 163–173.
Chiu, M.M., 2007. Families, economies, cultures, and science achievement in 41 countries: country-, school-, and student-level analyses. J. Fam. Psychol. 21, 510–519.
Chiu, M.M., McBride-Chang, C., 2010. Family and reading in 41 countries: differences
across cultures and students. Sci. Stud. Read. 14, 514–543.
Cisco, J., 2017. Who supports breastfeeding mothers?: an investigation of kin investment
in the United States. Hum. Nat. 28, 231–253.
Conti, G., Heckman, J.J., 2013. The developmental approach to child and adult health.
Pediatrics 131, 133–141.
Conway, K.S., Li, M., 2012. Family structure and child outcomes: a high definition, wide
angle “snapshot”. Rev. Econ. Househ. 10, 345–374.
Courtin, E., Avendano, M., 2016. Under one roof: the effect of co-residing with adult
children on depression in later life. Soc. Sci. Med. 168, 140–149.
Crosnoe, R., Elder Jr., G.H., 2002. Life course transitions, the generational stake, and
grandparent-grandchild relationships. J. Marriage Fam. 64, 1089–1096.
Cruise, S., O'Reilly, D., 2014. The influence of parents, older siblings, and non-parental
care on infant development at nine months of age. Infant Behav. Dev. 37, 546–555.
Cunningham, S., Elo, I., Herbst, K., Hosegood, V., 2010. Prenatal development in rural
South Africa: relationship between birth weight and access to fathers and grandparents. Popul. Stud. 64, 229–246.
de Brauw, A., Mu, R., 2011. Migration and the overweight and underweight status of
children in rural China. Food Policy 36, 88–100.
Deindl, C., Tieben, N., 2017. Resources of grandparents: educational outcomes across
three generations in Europe and Israel. J. Marriage Fam. 79, 769–783.
Del Boca, D., Piazzalunga, D., Pronzato, C., 2018. The role of grandparenting in early
childcare and child outcomes. Rev. Econ. Househ. 16, 477–512.
Deleire, T., Kalil, A., 2002. Good things come in threes: single-parent multigenerational
family structure and adolescent adjustment. Demography 39, 393–413.
Dong, H., Manfredini, M., Kurosu, S., Yang, W., Lee, J.Z., 2017. Kin and birth order effects
on male child mortality: three East Asian populations, 1716-1945. Evol. Hum. Behav.
38, 208–216.
Downie, J., Hay, D., Horner, B., Wichman, H., Hislop, A., 2010. Children living with their
grandparents: resilience and wellbeing. Int. J. Soc. Welf. 19, 8–22.
Duarte, R., Escario, J.-J., Molina, J.-A., 2016. Smoking transmission in-home across three
generations. J. Subst. Use 21, 268–272.
Dunifon, R., Bajracharya, A., 2012. The role of grandparents in the lives of youth. J. Fam.
Issues 33, 1168–1194.
Dunifon, R., Kowaleski-Jones, L., 2007. The influence of grandparents in single-mother
families. J. Marriage Fam. 69, 465–481.
Dunifon, R.E., Ziol-Guest, K.M., Kopko, K., 2014. Grandparent coresidence and family
well-being: implications for research and policy. Ann. Am. Acad. Pol. Soc. Sci. 654,
110–126.
Dunifon, R., Near, C., Ziol-Guest, K., 2018. Backup parents, playmates, friends: grandparents' time with grandchildren. J. Marriage Fam. 80, 752–767.
Edwards, O., 2006. Teachers' perceptions of the emotional and behavioral functioning of
children raised by grandparents. Pyschol. Sch. 43, 565–572.
Edwards, O., 2009. Empirical investigation of the psychosocial functioning of children
raised by grandparents. J. Appl. Psychol. 25, 128–145.
Eitle, D., Niedrist, F., Eitle, T.M., 2014. Gender, race, and delinquent behavior: an extension of power-control theory to American Indian adolescents. Deviant Behav. 35,
1023–1042.
Eli, K., Howell, K., Fisher, P., Nowicka, P., 2016. A question of balance: explaining differences between parental and grandparental perspectives on preschoolers' feeding
and physical activity. Soc. Sci. Med. 154, 28–35.
Emmott, E.H., Mace, R., 2015. Practical support from fathers and grandmothers is associated with lower levels of breastfeeding in the UK Millennium cohort study. PLoS
One 10, e0133547.
Escario, J.J., Wilkinson, A.V., 2015. The intergenerational transmission of smoking across
three cohabitant generations: a count data approach. J. Community Health 40,
912–919.
Fan, X.-h., Fang, X.-y., 2010. A comparison of problem behaviors between parent-present
children and parent-absent children in different care-taking modes. Chin. J. Clin.
Psychol. 18, 232–234.
Farrow, C., 2014. A comparison between the feeding practices of parents and grandparents. Eat. Behav. 15, 339–342.
Fergusson, E., Maughan, B., Golding, J., 2008. Which children receive grandparental care
and what effect does it have? J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 49, 161–169.
Ferreira, T.D.M., Piccioni, L.D., Queiroz, P.H.B., Silva, E.M., Vale, I.N.D., 2018. Influence
of grandmothers on exclusive breastfeeding: cross-sectional study. Einstein (São
Paulo) 16 (4), 1–7.
Flick, L., Vemulapalli, C., Stulac, B., Kemp, J., 2001. Home and videotape intervention
delays early complementary feeding among adolescent mothers. Arch. Pediatr.
Adolesc. Med. 155, 1231–1237.
Flouri, E., Buchanan, A., Tan, J.P., Griggs, J., Attar-Schwartz, S., 2010. Adverse life
events, area socio-economic disadvantage, and adolescent psychopathology: the role
of closeness to grandparents in moderating the effect of contextual stress. Stress 13,
402–412.
Fomby, P., James-Hawkins, L., Mollborn, S., 2015. Family resources in two generations
and school readiness among children of teen parents. Popul. Res. Policy Rev. 34,
733–759.
Formisano, A., Hunsberger, M., Bammann, K., Vanaelst, B., Molnar, D., Moreno, L.A.,
et al., 2014. Family structure and childhood obesity: results of the IDEFICS project.
Public Health Nutr. 17, 2307–2315.
Franca, M.C., Giugliani, E.R., Oliveira, L.D., Weigert, E.M., Santo, L.C., Kohler, C.V., et al.,
2008. [Bottle feeding during the first month of life: determinants and effect on
breastfeeding technique]. Rev. Saude Publica 42, 607–614.
Fuentes, M.J., Bernedo, I.M., 2009. Adaptation and family relationships from the point of
view of adolescents under the care of their grandparents. Rev. Psicol. Soc. 24, 53–64.
Fuller-Thomson, E., Minkler, M., 2001. American grandparents providing extensive child
care to their grandchildren: prevalence and profile. Gerontol. 41, 201–209.
Gibson, M., Mace, R., 2005. Helpful grandmothers in rural Ethiopia: a study of the effect
of kin on child survival and growth. Evol. Hum. Behav. 26, 469–482.
Giugliani, E.R., do Espirito Santo, L.C., de Oliveira, L.D., Aerts, D., 2008. Intake of water,
herbal teas and non-breast milks during the first month of life: associated factors and
impact on breastfeeding duration. Early Hum. Dev. 84, 305–310.
Giugliani, E.R.J., Nunes, L.M., Issler, R.M.S., Santo, L.C.d.E., Oliveira, L.D.d., 2019.
Involvement of maternal grandmother and teenage mother in intervention to reduce
pacifier use: a randomized clinical trial. J. Pediatr. 95, 166–172.
Goh Esther, C.L., 2013. You must finish your dinner. Br. Food J. 115, 365–376.
Goodman, C.C., 2012. Caregiving grandmothers and their grandchildren: well-being nine
years later. Child. Youth Serv. Rev. 34, 648–654.
Gorman, B., Braveman, J., 2008. Family structure differences in health care utilization
among U.S. children. Soc. Sci. Med. 67, 1766–1775.
Goulette, N.W., Evans, S.Z., King, D., 2016. Exploring the behavior of juveniles and young
adults raised by custodial grandmothers. Child. Youth Serv. Rev. 70, 349–356.
Grau, J.M., Duran, P.A., Castellanos, P., Smith, E.N., Silberman, S.G., Wood, L.E., 2015.
Developmental outcomes of toddlers of young Latina mothers: cultural, family, and
parenting factors. Infant Behav. Dev. 41, 113–126.
Griggs, J., Tan, J.-P., Buchanan, A., Attar-Schwartz, S., Flouri, E., 2010. ‘They’ve always
been there for me’: grandparental involvement and child well-being. Child. Soc. 24,
200–214.
Guo, X.-l., 2014. The influence of grandparenting on cognitive development of children: a
longitudinal study. Chin. J. Clin. Psychol. 22, 1072–1076.
Gurupdesh, K., Parminder, K., Jaswal, S., 2013. Impact of child care strategies on health
and nutritional status of children in peri-urban Punjab. Asian J. Home Sci. 8,
539–543.
Hallsten, M., Pfeffer, F.T., 2017. Grand advantage: family wealth and grandchildren's
educational achievement in Sweden. Am. Sociol. Rev. 82, 328–360.
Hamilton, H.A., 2005. Extended families and adolescent well-being. J. Adolesc. Health
36, 260–266.
Hank, K., Buber, I., 2009. Grandparents caring for their grandchildren: findings from the
2004 survey of health, ageing, and retirement in Europe. J. Fam. Issues 30, 53–73.
Hansen, K., Hawkes, D., 2009. Early childcare and child development. J. Soc. Policy 38,
211–239.
Harper, C.C., McLanahan, S.S., 2004. Father absence and youth incarceration. J. Res.
Adolesc. 14, 369–397.
Hawkes, K., O’Connell, J.F., Blurton Jones, N.G., Alvarez, H., Charnov, E.L., 2017. The
grandmother hypothesis and human evolution. In: Chagnon, N. (Ed.), Adaptation and
Human Behavior: An Anthropological Perspective. Routledge, New York.
Hayslip, B., Smith, G. (Eds.), 2012. Resilient Grandparent Caregivers: A Strengths-Based
Perspective. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, New York, NY.
Hayslip, B., Heidemaire, B., Garner, A., 2014. Health and grandparent−grandchild wellbeing: one-year longitudinal findings for custodial grandfamilies. J. Aging Health 26,
559–582.
29
Social Science & Medicine 239 (2019) 112476
A.F.A. Sadruddin, et al.
Hayslip, B., Fruhauf, C., Dolbin-MacNab, M., 2017. Grandparents raising grandchildren:
what have we learned over the past decade? Gerontol. 00, 1–12.
He, Q., Li, X., Wang, R., 2018. Childhood obesity in China: does grandparents' coresidence
matter? Econ. Hum. Biol. 29, 56–63.
Heath, K.M., 2003. The effects of kin propinquity on infant mortality. Soc. Biol. 50,
270–280.
Hon, K.L., Ma, K.C., Wong, Y., Leung, T.F., Fok, T.F., 2005. A survey of traditional Chinese
medicine use in children with atopic dermatitis attending a paediatric dermatology
clinic. J. Dermatol. Treat. 16, 154–157.
Ice, G.H., Sadruddin, A.F.A., Vagedes, A., Yogo, J., Juma, E., 2012. Stress associated with
caregiving: an examination of the stress process model among Kenyan Luo elders.
Soc. Sci. Med. 74, 2020–2027.
Ikeda, N., Fuse, K., Nishi, N., 2017. Changes in the effects of living with no siblings or
living with grandparents on overweight and obesity in children: results from a national cohort study in Japan. PLoS One 12, e0175726.
Ingersoll-Dayton, B., Punpuing, S., Tangchonlatip, K., Yakas, L., 2018. Pathways to
grandparents' provision of care in skipped-generation households in Thailand. Ageing
Soc. 38, 1429–1452.
Ingram, J., Johnson, D., Hamid, N., 2003. South Asian grandmothers' influence on breast
feeding in Bristol. Midwifery 19, 318–327.
Ishizawa, H., 2004. Minority language use among grandchildren in multigenerational
households. Sociol. Perspect. 47, 465–483.
Jahromi, L.B., Zeiders, K.H., Updegraff, K.A., Umana-Taylor, A.J., Bayless, S.D., 2018.
Coparenting conflict and academic readiness in children of teen mothers: effortful
control as a mediator. Fam. Process 57, 462–476.
Jamison, C.S., Cornell, L.L., Jamison, P.L., Nakazato, H., 2002. Are all grandmothers
equal? A review and a preliminary test of the “grandmother hypothesis” in
Tokugawa, Japan. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 119, 67–76.
Jessel, J., Kenner, C., Gregory, E., Ruby, M., Arju, T., 2011. Different spaces: learning and
literacy with children and their grandparents in East London homes. Linguist. Educ.
22, 37–50.
Jia, Z., Tian, W., 2010. Loneliness of left‐behind children: a cross‐sectional survey in a
sample of rural China. Child Care Health Dev. 36, 812–817.
Jia, S.M., Wang, L., Shi, Y.J., Li, P., 2011. [Relations between aggressive behavior and
family factors among preschool children in Shanghai]. Chin. J. Epidemiol. 32,
1216–1220.
Jia, S., Wang, L., Shi, Y., Li, P., 2016. Family risk factors associated with aggressive behavior in Chinese preschool children. J. Pediatr. Nurs. 31, e367–e374.
Jingxiong, J., Rosenqvist, U., Wang, H., Greiner, T., Lian, G., Sarkadi, A., 2007. Influence
of grandparents on eating behaviors of young children in Chinese three-generation
families. Appetite 48, 377–383.
Johnson, B.T., Hennessy, E.A., 2019. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the health
sciences: best practice methods for research syntheses. Soc. Sci. Med. 233, 237–251.
Kamo, Y., 2000. Racial and ethnic differences in extended family households. Sociol.
Perspect. 43, 211–229.
Kaneko, A., Kaneita, Y., Yokoyama, E., Miyake, T., Harano, S., Suzuki, K., et al., 2006.
Factors associated with exclusive breast-feeding in Japan: for activities to support
child-rearing with breast-feeding. J. Epidemiol. 16, 57–63.
Karmacharya, C., Cunningham, K., Choufani, J., Kadiyala, S., 2017. Grandmothers'
knowledge positively influences maternal knowledge and infant and young child
feeding practices. Public Health Nutr. 20, 2114–2123.
Kasedde, S., Aoide, M., Ross, D., 2014. They are not always a burden: older people and
child fostering in Uganda during the HIV epidemic. Soc. Sci. Med. 113, 161–168.
Kelch-Oliver, K., 2011. African American grandchildren raised in grandparent-headed
families: an exploratory study. Fam. J. 19, 396–406.
Kelley, S., Whitley, D., Campos, P., 2011. Behavior problems in children raised by
grandmothers: the role of caregiver distress, family resources, and the home environment. Child. Youth Serv. Rev. 33, 2138–2145.
Kemkes-Grottenthaler, A., 2005. Of grandmothers, grandfathers and wicked step-grandparents. Differential impact of paternal grandparents on grandoffspring survival.
Hist. Soc. Res./Hist. Sozialforsch. 30, 219–239.
Kerr, R., Berti, P., Chirwa, M., 2007. Breastfeeding and mixed feeding practices in
Malawi: timing, reasons, decision makers, and child health consequences. Food Nutr.
Bull. 28, 90–99.
Kisner, K., Parlakian, R., MacLaughlin, S., 2017. Grandparents Who Care. Zero to Three,
Washington, DC.
Knodel, J., Wassana, I.-E., 2004. The economic consequences for parents of losing an
adult child to AIDS: evidence from Thailand. Soc. Sci. Med. 59, 987–1001.
Ko, H., 2019. Intergenerational effects of old-age pension on children's health and wellbeing. Int. J. Health Plan. Manag. 34, e1208–e1214.
Kobayashi, S., Asakura, K., Suga, H., Sasaki, S., 2015. Cohabitational effect of grandparents on dietary intake among young Japanese women and their mothers living
together. A multicenter cross-sectional study. Appetite 91, 287–297.
Komonpaisarn, T., Loichinger, E., 2019. Providing regular care for grandchildren in
Thailand: an analysis of the impact on grandparents' health. Soc. Sci. Med. 229,
117–125.
Krueger, P., Jutte, D., Franzini, L., Elo, I., Hayward, M., 2015. Family structure and
multiple domains of child well-being in the United States: a cross sectional study.
Popul. Health Metrics 13 (6), 1–11.
Lakó, J.H., 2014. The issues of the relationship of grandparents and grandchildren in the
light of physical activity. Eur. J. Ment. Health 9, 178–194.
Lau, J.D., Au, L.Y., Chao, E., Elbaar, L., Tse, R., 2019. The association of grandparent care
with childhood overweight and obesity in Chinese American families. Child. Obes.
15, 14–20.
Lawson, D.W., Schaffnit, S.B., Hassan, A., Ngadaya, E., Ngowi, B., Mfinanga, S.G.M.,
et al., 2017. Father absence but not fosterage predicts food insecurity, relative
poverty, and poor child health in northern Tanzania. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 29, e22938.
Lee, R., Chun, J., Chung, I.-J., Kang, H., Nho, C.R., Woo, S., 2017. Kinship foster care and
school adjustment: evidence from a nationally representative sample of children in
out-of-home care in South Korea. Child Youth Care Forum 46, 335–356.
Lehti, H., Erola, J., Tanskanen, A.O., 2019. Tying the extended family knot—grandparents’ influence on educational achievement. Eur. Sociol. Rev. 35, 29–48.
Levetan, J.L., Wild, L.G., 2016. The implications of maternal grandmother coresidence
and involvement for adolescent adjustment in South Africa. Int. J. Psychol. 51,
356–365.
Lewin, S., Glenton, C., Munthe-Kaas, H., Carlsen, B., Colvin, C.J., Gülmezoglu, M., et al.,
2015. Using qualitative evidence in decision making for health and social interventions: an approach to assess confidence in findings from qualitative evidence syntheses (GRADE-CERQual). PLoS Med. 12, e1001895.
Li, X., Liu, Y., 2019. Parent-grandparent coparenting relationship, maternal parenting
self-efficacy, and young children's social competence in Chinese urban families. J.
Child Fam. Stud. 28, 1145–1153.
Li, Y., Mora, R., 2016. Re-assessing the impact of the grandparent's income on the infant
mortality rate: an evaluation of the old age allowance program in Nepal. World Dev.
87, 333–348.
Li, H., Yang, L., Feng, Q.M., Li, C.L., 2011. [Analysis of the risk factors for pesticide
poisoning among children in countryside of Guigang city]. Chin. J. Prev. Med. 45,
1103–1107.
Li, B., Adab, P., Cheng, K.K., 2014. Family and neighborhood correlates of overweight
and obesogenic behaviors among Chinese children. Int. J. Behav. Med. 21, 700–709.
Li, B., Adab, P., Cheng, K.K., 2015. The role of grandparents in childhood obesity in China
- evidence from a mixed methods study. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 12, 91.
Li, T., Lam, C.B., Chan, K.K.-S., 2018. Grandparental involvement and young adults’
cognitive and social adjustment: the moderating role of filial piety in Hong Kong. J.
Soc. Pers. Relatsh. 35, 999–1018.
Li, Q., Liang, F., Liang, W., Zhang, J., Niu, M., Han, Y., 2017a. The influence of different
caregivers on infant growth and development in China. Front. Pediatr. 5, 243.
Lin, W.-H., Yi, C.-C., 2018. Subjective well-being and family structure during early adolescence: a prospective study. J. Early Adolesc. 39, 426–452.
Lindberg, L., Ek, A., Nyman, J., Marcus, C., Ulijaszek, S., Nowicka, P., 2016. Low
grandparental social support combined with low parental socioeconomic status is
closely associated with obesity in preschool‐aged children: a pilot study. Pediatr.
Obes. 11, 313–316.
Liu, R.X., 2016. School bonding, peer associations, and self-views: the influences of
gender and grandparent attachment on adolescents in mainland China. Youth Soc.
48, 451–469.
Liu, L., Fan, L., Hou, X.-Y., Wu, C.-A., Yin, X.-N., Wen, G.-M., et al., 2018. Family
childcare types and conduct problem behaviors in young children: the mediation role
of caregiver-child interaction. Front. Pediatr. 6, 217.
Liu, B., Qing, P., Xiao, S., Liao, F., 2019. The influence of grandparents' indulgence on the
health status of the left-behind children in rural areas from the perspective of food
consumption: a case study from Hubei Province. Chin. Rural Econ. 1, 1–12.
Lu, Y., Zhu, P., Gao, R., Liang, Z.Z., Huang, W., Tao, F.B., 2012. [Association of rearing
patterns with diet and temperament traits among infants in urban areas.]. Chin. J.
Contemp. Pediatr. 14, 48–53.
Lundberg, M., Wuermli, A., 2012. Children and Youth in Crisis: Protecting and Promoting
Human Development in Times of Economic Shocks. The World Bank,
Washington, DC.
Lussier, G., Deater-Deckard, K., Dunn, J., Davies, L., 2002. Support across two generations. J. Fam. Psychol. 16.
Ma, W.J., Nie, S.P., Xu, H.F., Xu, Y.J., Zhang, Y.R., 2010. Socioeconomic status and the
occurrence of non-fatal child pedestrian injury: results from a cross-sectional survey.
Saf. Sci. 48, 823–828.
Masfety, V.K., Aarnink, C., Otten, R., Bitfoi, A., Mihova, Z., Lesinskiene, S., et al., 2019.
Three-generation households and child mental health in European countries. Soc.
Psychiatry Psychiatr. Epidemiol. 54, 427–436.
Mazzucato, V., Cebotari, V., Veale, A., White, A., Vivet, J., 2015. International parental
migration and the psychological well-being of children in Ghana, Nigeria, and
Angola. Soc. Sci. Med. 132, 215–224.
McDonnell, T., 2016. Non-cognitive development in early childhood: the influence of
maternal employment and the mediating role of childcare. Econ. Soc. Rev. 47 (4)
Winter (2016): GROWING UP IN IRELAND - Papers Presented at The Annual GUI
Conference, Dublin Castle, 3 December 2015.
McFee, R.B., Caraccio, T.R., 2006. “Hang up your pocketbook” – an easy intervention for
the granny syndrome: grandparents as a risk factor in unintentional pediatric exposures to pharmaceuticals. J. Am. Osteopath. Assoc. 106, 405–411.
Mehta, K., Thang, L., 2012. Experiencing Grandparenthood: An Asian Perspective
Singapore. Springer.
Metbulut, A.P., Ozmert, E.N., Teksam, O., Yurdakok, K., 2018. A comparison between the
feeding practices of parents and grandparents. Eur. J. Pediatr. 177, 1785–1794.
Minkler, M., 1999. Intergenerational households headed by grandparents: contexts, realities, and implications for policy. J. Aging Stud. 13, 199–218.
Minkler, M., Fuller-Thomson, E., 2005. African American grandparents raising grandchildren: a national study using the census 2000 American community survey. J.
Gerontol.: Ser. B 60, S82–S92.
Modin, B., Fritzell, J., 2009. The long arm of the family: are parental and grandparental
earnings related to young men's body mass index and cognitive ability? Int. J.
Epidemiol. 38, 733–744.
Modin, B., Erikson, R., Vågerö, D., 2012. Intergenerational continuity in school performance: do grandparents matter? Eur. Sociol. Rev. 29, 858–870.
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D.G., Group, T.P., 2009. Preferred reporting
items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med.
30
Social Science & Medicine 239 (2019) 112476
A.F.A. Sadruddin, et al.
6, 1–6.
Mollborn, S., Fomby, P., Dennis, J.A., 2011. Who matters for children’s early development? Race/ethnicity and extended household structures in the United States. Child
Indic. Res. 4, 389–411.
Møllegaard, S., Jæger, M.M., 2015. The effect of grandparents' economic, cultural, and
social capital on grandchildren's educational success. Res. Soc. Stratif. Mobil. 42,
11–19.
Monserud, M., Elder, J.G., 2011. Household structure and children's educational attainment: a perspective on coresidence with grandparents. J. Marriage Fam. 73,
981–1000.
Moon, R.Y., Omron, R., 2002. Determinants of infant sleep position in an urban population. Clin. Pediatr. (Phila) 41, 569–573.
Moon, R.Y., Oden, R.P., Grady, K.C., 2004. Back to Sleep: an educational intervention
with women, infants, and children program clients. Pediatrics 113, 542–547.
Morioka, H., Itani, O., Jike, M., Nakagome, S., Otsuka, Y., Ohida, T., 2018. Risk factors at
birth predictive of subsequent injury among Japanese preschool children: a nationwide 5-year cohort study. J. Dev. Behav. Pediatr. 39, 424–433.
Morita, A., Ochi, M., Isumi, A., Fujiwara, T., 2019. Association between grandparent
coresidence and weight change among first-grade Japanese children. Pediatr. Obes.
14, e12524.
Moschonis, G., Tanagra, S., Vandorou, A., Kyriakou, A.E., Dede, V., Siatitsa, P.E., et al.,
2010. Social, economic and demographic correlates of overweight and obesity in
primary-school children: preliminary data from the Healthy Growth Study. Public
Health Nutr. 13, 1693–1700.
Mukuria, A.G., Martin, S.L., Egondi, T., Bingham, A., Thuita, F.M., 2016. Role of social
support in improving infant feeding practices in western Kenya: a quasi-experimental
study. Glob. Health Sci. Pract. 4, 55–72.
Musil, C.M., Rice, H.M., Singer, M., Givens, S.E., Warner, C.B., Zauszniewski, J.A., et al.,
2018. Grandchildren's depressive symptoms and perceptions of family functioning:
protective and influencing factors. West. J. Nurs. Res. 40, 1319–1338.
Nadorff, D., Patrick, J., 2018. Predicting child safety: the effect of custodial grandparents'
depressive symptoms, home safety, knowledge, and gender. J. Intergener. Relat. 16,
225–242.
Nanthamongkolchai, S., Munsawaengsub, C., Nanthamongkolchai, C., 2009. Influence of
child rearing by grandparent on the development of children aged six to twelve years.
J. Med. Assoc. Thail. 92 (92), 430–434.
Nanthamongkolchai, S., Munsawaengsub, C., Nanthamongkolchai, C., 2011. Comparison
of the health status of children aged between 6 and 12 years reared by grandparents
and parents. Asia Pac. J. Public Health 2, 766–773.
Negin, J., Coffman, J., Vizintin, P., Raynes-Greenow, C., 2016. The influence of grandmothers on breastfeeding rates: a systematic review. Pregnancy Childbirth 16, 1–10.
Noah, A.J., 2018. Understanding the relationships between diverse family structures and
the development of emotion regulation of Mexican-origin children: population-based
estimates. Child Indic. Res. 11, 1515–1530.
Notermans, C., 2003. Sharing home, food, and bed: paths of grandmotherhood in East
Cameroon. Africa 74, 6–27.
Nunes, L.M., Giugliani, E.R.J., do Espírito Santo, L.C., de Oliveira, L.D., 2011. Reduction
of unnecessary intake of water and herbal teas on breast-fed infants: a randomized
clinical trial with adolescent mothers and grandmothers. J. Adolesc. Health 49,
258–264.
N’Zi, A.M., Stevens, M.L., Eyberg, S.M., 2016. Child directed interaction training for
young children in kinship care: a pilot study. Child Abuse Negl. 55, 81–91.
Oburu, P., 2005. Caregiving stress and adjustment problems of Kenyan orphans raised by
grandmothers. Infant Child Dev. 14, 199–210.
Odom, E.C., Li, R., Scanlon, K.S., Perrine, C.G., Grummer-Strawn, L., 2014. Association of
family and health care provider opinion on infant feeding with mother's breastfeeding decision. J. Acad. Nutr. Diet. 114, 1203–1207.
Panter-Brick, C., Burgess, A., Eggerman, M., McAllister, F., Pruett, K., Leckman, J.F.,
2014. Practitioner review: engaging fathers – recommendations for a game change in
parenting interventions based on a systematic review of the global evidence. J. Child
Psychol. Psychiatry 55, 1187–1212.
Parker, E., Short, S., 2009. Grandmother co-residence and school enrollment in SubSaharan Africa. J. Fam. Issues 30, 813–836.
Pérez, E.R., Turra, C.M., Queiroz, B.L., 2007. Grandparents and grandchildren living together, a better life for the youngest? The cases of Brazil and Peru. Papeles Población
13, 47–75.
Pérez-Escamilla, R., Cavallera, V., Tomlinson, M., Dua, T., 2018. Scaling up integrated
early childhood development programs: lessons from four countries. Child Care
Health Dev. 44, 50–61.
Perry, G., 2017. Alloparental care and assistance in a normatively patrilocal society. Curr.
Anthropol. 58, 114–123.
Pew Research Center, 2013. At Grandmother's House We Stay. Pew Research Center,
Washington, D.C.
Pilgrim, N.A., Ahmed, S., Gray, R.H., Sekasanvu, J., Lutalo, T., Nalugoda, F., et al., 2014.
Family structure effects on early sexual debut among adolescent girls in Rakai,
Uganda. Vulnerable Child. Youth Stud. 9, 193–205.
Pilkauskas, N.V., 2012. Three-generation family households: differences by family
structure at birth. J. Marriage Fam. 74, 931–943.
Pilkauskas, N.V., 2014a. Breastfeeding initiation and duration in coresident grandparent,
mother and infant households. Matern. Child Health J. 18, 1955–1963.
Pilkauskas, N.V., 2014b. Living with a grandparent and parent in early childhood: associations with school readiness and differences by demographic characteristics. Dev.
Psychol. 50, 2587–2599.
Pilkauskas, N.V., Cross, C., 2018. Beyond the nuclear family: trends in children living in
shared households. Demography 55, 2283–2297.
Pilkauskas, N., Dunifon, R., 2016. Understanding grandfamilies: characteristics of
grandparents, nonresident parents, and children. J. Marriage Fam. 78, 623–633.
Pilkauskas, N., Martinson, M., 2014. Three-generation family households in early childhood: comparisons between the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia.
Demogr. Res. 30, 1639–1652.
Pittman, L., 2007. Grandmothers' involvement among young adolescents growing up in
poverty. J. Res. Adolesc. 17, 89–116.
Pittman, L., Boswell, M., 2007. The role of grandmothers in the lives of preschoolers
growing up in urban poverty. Appl. Dev. Sci. 11, 20–42.
Poehlmann, J., Park, J., Bouffiou, L., Abrahms, J., Shlafer, R., Hahn, E., 2008.
Representations of family relationships in children living with custodial grandparents. Attach. Hum. Dev. 10, 165–188.
Pong, S.-L., Chen, V., 2010. Co-resident grandparents and grandchildren's academic
performance in Taiwan. J. Comp. Fam. Stud. 41, 111–129.
Profe, W., Wild, L., 2017. Mother, father, and grandparent involvement: associations with
adolescent mental health and substance use. J. Fam. Issues 38, 776–797.
Pulgaron, E., Marchante, A., Agosto, Y., Lebron, C., Delamater, M., 2016. Grandparent
involvement and children's health outcomes: the current state of the literature. Fam.
Syst. Health 34, 260–269.
Radl, J., Salazar, L., Cebolla-Boado, H., 2017. Does living in a fatherless household
compromise educational success? A comparative study of cognitive and non-cognitive skills. Eur. J. Popul. 33, 217–242.
Ragsdale, G., 2004. Grandmothering in Cambridgeshire, 1770-1861. Hum. Nat. 15,
301–317.
Razzaque, A., Hossain, M.A., DaVanzo, J., Hoque, M.E., Alam, N., Bhuiya, A., et al., 2014.
Effect of maternal mortality on survival of under-five children. Asian Popul. Stud. 10,
60–74.
Renny, P.P., Jayasankara, R., 2016. Influence of grandparents on the emotional intelligence of early adolescents in Kerala. J. Indian Acad. Appl. Psychol. 42, 370–373.
Reynolds, S., Fernald, L.C., Deardorff, J., Behrman, J., 2018. Family structure and child
development in Chile: a longitudinal analysis of household transitions involving fathers and grandparents. Demogr. Res. 38, 1777–1814.
Rhodes, K., Chan, F., Prichard, I., Coveney, J., Ward, P., Wilson, C., 2016.
Intergenerational transmission of dietary behaviours: a qualitative study of AngloAustralian, Chinese-Australian and Italian-Australian three-generation families.
Appetite 103, 309–317.
Rillamas-Sun, E., Harlow, S.D., Randolph Jr., J.F., 2014. Grandmothers' smoking in
pregnancy and grandchildren's birth weight: comparisons by grandmother birth cohort. Matern. Child Health J. 18, 1691–1698.
Rogers, E., Bell, L., Mehta, K., 2019. Exploring the role of grandparents in the feeding of
grandchildren aged 1-5 years. J. Nutr. Educ. Behav. 51, 300–306.
Rwenge, M., 2000. Sexual risk behaviors among young people in Bamenda, Cameroon.
Int. Fam. Plan. Perspect. 26, 118–123.
Ryan, L.M., Lindstrom Johnson, S., Jones, V., Fein, J.A., Cheng, T.L., 2019. Is household
composition associated with repeat fight injuries in adolescents living in urban
neighborhoods? J. Interpers. Violence 886260519829768.
Sata, M., Yamagishi, K., Sairenchi, T., Ikeda, A., Irie, F., Watanabe, H., et al., 2015. Impact
of caregiver type for 3-year-old children on subsequent between-meal eating habits
and being overweight from childhood to adulthood: a 20-year follow-up of the
Ibaraki Children's Cohort (IBACHIL) study. J. Epidemiol. 25, 600–607.
Schatz, E., Seeley, J., 2015. Gender, ageing and carework in East and Southern Africa.
Glob. Public Health 1–16.
Schmeer, K.K., 2013. Family structure and child anemia in Mexico. Soc. Sci. Med. 95,
16–23.
Schrijner, S., Smits, J., 2018a. Grandmothers and children’s schooling in Sub-Saharan
Africa. Hum. Nat. 29, 65–89.
Schrijner, S., Smits, J., 2018b. Grandparents and children’s stunting in Sub-Saharan
Africa. Soc. Sci. Med. 205, 90–98.
Schwartz, R., Vigo, A., de Oliveira, L.D., Justo Giugliani, E.R., 2015. The effect of a probreastfeeding and healthy complementary feeding intervention targeting adolescent
mothers and grandmothers on growth and prevalence of overweight of preschool
children. PLoS One 10, e0131884.
Sear, R., 2008. Kin and child survival in rural Malawi : are matrilineal kin always beneficial in a matrilineal society? Hum. Nat. 19, 277–293.
Sear, R., Steele, F., McGregor, I.A., Mace, R., 2002. The effects of kin on child mortality in
rural Gambia. Demography 39, 43–63.
Seay, D.M., Jahromi, L.B., Umana-Taylor, A.J., Updegraff, K.A., 2016. Intergenerational
transmission of maladaptive parenting strategies in families of adolescent mothers:
effects from grandmothers to young children. J. Abnorm. Child Psychol. 44,
1097–1109.
Sharer, M., Cluver, L., Shields, J., 2015. Mental health of youth orphaned due to AIDS in
South Africa: biological and supportive links to caregivers. Vulnerable Child. Youth
Stud. 10, 141–152.
Sharma, M., Kanani, S., 2006. Grandmothers' influence on child care. Indian J. Pediatr.
73, 295–298.
Shaw, D.J., Warren, T.B., Johnson, M.E., 2019. Family structure and past-30 day opioid
misuse among justice-involved children. Subst. Use Misuse 54, 1226–1235.
Shea, B.J., Reeves, B.C., Wells, G., Thuku, M., Hamel, C., Moran, J., et al., 2017. AMSTAR
2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or nonrandomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. Brit. Med. J. 358, j4008.
Sheppard, P., Sear, R., 2016. Do grandparents compete with or support their grandchildren? In Guatemala, paternal grandmothers may compete, and maternal grandmothers may cooperate. R. Soc. Open Sci. 3, 160069.
Shi, J., Wang, L., Yao, Y., Su, N., Zhao, X., Chen, F., 2017a. Family impacts on self-esteem
in Chinese college freshmen. Front. Psychiatry 8, 279.
Shi, J., Wang, L., Yao, Y., Su, N., Zhao, X., Zhan, C., 2017b. Family function and selfesteem among Chinese university students with and without grandparenting
31
Social Science & Medicine 239 (2019) 112476
A.F.A. Sadruddin, et al.
experience: moderating effect of social support. Front. Psychol. 8, 886.
Smith, K., 2018. Parental substance use in New Hampshire: who cares for children? In:
The Casey School of Public Policy at the University of New Hampshire, pp. 1–6.
Smith, C., Beitranm, A., 2003. The role of federal policies in supporting grandparents
raising grandchildren families: the case of the U.S. J. Intergener. Relat. 1, 2003.
Smith, G., Palmieri, P., 2007. Risk of psychological difficulties among children raised by
custodial grandparents. Psychiatr. Serv. 58, 1303–13010.
Smith, G., Palmieri, P., Hancock, G., Richardson, R., 2008. Custodial grandmothers'
psychological distress, dysfunctional parenting, and grandchildren's adjustment. Int.
J. Aging Hum. Dev. 67, 327–357.
Smith, G., Cichy, K., Montoro-Rodriquez, J., 2015. Impact of coping resources on the wellbeing of custodial grandmothers and grandchildren. Fam. Relat. 64, 378–392.
Smith, G., Hayslip, B., Hancock, G., Merchant, W., Montoro-Rodriguez, J., Strieder, F.,
2018a. The family stress model as it applies to custodial grandfamilies: a cross validation. J. Child Fam. Stud. 27, 505–521.
Smith, G.C., Hayslip, B., Hancock, G.R., Strieder, F.H., Montoro-Rodriguez, J., 2018b. A
randomized clinical trial of interventions for improving well-being in custodial
grandfamilies. J. Fam. Psychol. 32, 816–827.
Snopkowski, K., Sear, R., 2015. Grandparental help in Indonesia is directed preferentially
towards needier descendants: a potential confounder when exploring grandparental
influences on child health. Soc. Sci. Med. 128, 105–114.
Soldateli, B., Vigo, A., Giugliani, E.R., 2016. Effect of pattern and duration of breastfeeding on the consumption of fruits and vegetables among preschool children. PLoS
One 11, e0148357.
Song, J., Ma, C., Gu, C., Zuo, B., 2018. What matters most to the left-behind children's life
satisfaction and school engagement: parent or grandparent? J. Child Fam. Stud. 27,
2481–2490.
Sun, Y., Jiang, N., 2017. The effect of grandparents’ co-parenting on young children’s
personality and adaptation: Chinese three-generation families. Asian Soc. Sci. 13,
7–15.
Sun, Y., Li, Y., 2013. Alternative households, structural changes, and cognitive development of infants and toddlers. J. Fam. Issues 35, 1440–1472.
Sun, M., Xue, Z., Zhang, W., Guo, R., Hu, A., Li, Y., et al., 2017. Psychotic-like experiences, trauma and related risk factors among “left-behind” children in China.
Schizophr. Res. 181, 43–48.
Susiloretni, K.A., Hadi, H., Prabandari, Y.S., Soenarto, Y.S., Wilopo, S.A., 2015. What
works to improve duration of exclusive breastfeeding: lessons from the exclusive
breastfeeding promotion program in rural Indonesia. Matern. Child Health J. 19,
1515–1525.
Susin, L.R., Giugliani, E.R., Kummer, S.C., 2005. Influence of grandmothers on breastfeeding practices. Rev. Saude Publica 39, 141–147.
Sutchritpongsa, S., 2016. Unintentional poisoning in children: analysis for significant risk
factors. Siriraj Med. J. 68, 17–22.
Tang, W., Wang, G., Hu, T., Dai, Q., Xu, J., Yang, Y., et al., 2018. Mental health and
psychosocial problems among Chinese left-behind children: a cross-sectional comparative study. J. Affect. Disord. 241, 133–141.
Tanskanen, A.O., 2013. The association between grandmaternal investment and early
years overweight in the UK. Evol. Psychol. 11, 417–425.
Tanskanen, A.O., Danielsbacka, M., 2012. Beneficial effects of grandparental involvement
vary by lineage in the UK. Personal. Individ. Differ. 53, 985–988.
Tanskanen, A.O., Danielsbacka, M., 2017. Association between grandparental co-residence and early childhood injury in the UK. Child Indic. Res. 10, 825–837.
Tanskanen, A.O., Danielsbacka, M., 2018. Multigenerational effects on children's cognitive and socioemotional outcomes: a within-child investigation. Child Dev. 89,
1856–1870.
Tenkorang, E.Y., Adjei, J.K., 2015. Household living arrangements and transition to
sexual debut among young people in Ghana. Sex. Educ. 15, 1–18.
Thornberry, T.P., Krohn, M.D., Freeman-Gallant, A., 2006. Intergenerational roots of
early onset substance use. J. Drug Issues 36, 1–28.
Titiloye, M., Brieger, W., 2009. Infant weaning methods: an intergenerational view from
Igbo-Ora Nigeria. Appl. Res. Eval. 29, 323–334.
United States Senate, 2018. Special Committee on AGING: Bill to Support Grandparents
Raising Grandchildren as Opioid Epidemic Increases Their Numbers.
Urita, Y., Watanabe, T., Kawagoe, N., Takemoto, I., Tanaka, H., Kijima, S., et al., 2013.
Role of infected grandmothers in transmission of Helicobacter pylori to children in a
Japanese rural town. J. Paediatr. Child Health 49, 394–398.
U.S. Census Bureau, 2018. America's Families and Living Arrangements: 2018.
Van Heerden, A., Wild, L.G., 2018. Grandparent support and mental and behavioural
health in middle childhood. Soc. Dev. 27, 366–380.
Wang, P., Song, P., Chen, C.P., Liang, J., Jian, F.F., Zhang, J.B., 2009. [A comparative
study on psychological and behavioral development in children aged 1 to 3 years
fostered by grandparents and by parents]. Chin. J. Contemp. Pediatr. 11, 1006–1007.
Wang, C.D., Hayslip Jr., B., Sun, Q., Zhu, W., 2019. Grandparents as the primary care
providers for their grandchildren: a cross-cultural comparison of Chinese and U.S.
Samples. Int. J. Aging Hum. Dev 91415018824722.
Weiss, B., Dang, M., Trung, L., Nguyen, M.C., Thuy, N.T., Pollack, A., 2014. A nationallyrepresentative epidemiological and risk factor assessment of child mental health in
Vietnam. Int. Perspect. Psychol. 3, 139–153.
Xie, H., Caldwell, L.L., Loy, S., Robledo, M., 2018. A qualitative study of Latino grandparents’ involvement in and support for grandchildren’s leisure time physical activity.
Health Educ. Behav. 45, 781–789.
Xing, S., Liang, X., Yue, J., Wang, Z., 2016a. Multiple attachment relationships and the
impacts on children’s socio-emotional development under the background of
grandmother co-parenting. Acta Psychol. Sin. 48, 518–528.
Xing, S., Zhou, Q., Archer, M., Yue, J., Wang, Z., 2016b. Infant temperamental reactivity,
maternal and grandparental sensitivity: differential susceptibility for behavior problems in China. Early Hum. Dev. 101, 99–105.
Xu, H., 2019. Physical and mental health of Chinese grandparents caring for grandchildren and great-grandparents. Soc. Sci. Med. 229, 106–116.
Xu, L., Munir, K., Kanabkaew, C., Le Coeur, S., 2017. Factors influencing antiretroviral
treatment suboptimal adherence among perinatally HIV-infected adolescents in
Thailand. PLoS One 12, e0172392.
Xue-Yan, Z., Dong-Mei, L., Dan-Dan, X., Le-Shan, Z., 2016. Obese Chinese primary-school
students and low self-esteem: a cross-sectional study. Iran. J. Pediatr. 26 (4), e3777.
Young, K., Duncanson, K., Burrows, T., 2018. Influence of grandparents on the dietary
intake of their 2-12-old grandchildren: a systematic review. Nutr. Dietics 0, 1–16.
Yue, A., Zhang, N., Liu, X., Tang, L., Luo, R., Yang, M., et al., 2018. Do infant feeding
practices differ between grandmothers and mothers in rural China? Evidence from
rural shaanxi province. Fam. Community Health 41, 233–243.
Yun, E.K., Shin, S.H., 2013. Comparison of the factors influencing young adolescents'
aggression according to family structure. J. Korean Acad. Nurs. 43, 321–330.
Zhang, Y., Wei, M., Zhang, Y.Q., Shen, N.P., 2013. Impact of family management on
psychological and behavioral problems in children with chronic diseases. J. Shanghai
Jiaot. Univ. 33, 303–309.
Zhang, N., Becares, L., Chandola, T., Callery, P., 2015. Intergenerational differences in
beliefs about healthy eating among carers of left-behind children in rural China: a
qualitative study. Appetite 95, 484–491.
Zhao, J., Zhang, T., Lin, L., 2016. Grandparent-child cohesion and depression in leftbehind children: the mediating role of cognitive appraisals for left-behind hassles.
Chin. J. Clin. Psychol. 24, 1092–1097.
Ziol-Guest, K., Dunifon, R., 2014. Complex living arrangements and child health: examining family structure linkages with children’s health outcomes. Family Relat. 63,
424–437.
Zong, X.N., Li, H., Zhang, Y.Q., 2015. Family-related risk factors of obesity among preschool children: results from a series of national epidemiological surveys in China.
BMC Public Health 15, 927.
32