A brief description of the Youle Jino copula

A Brief Description of the Youle Jino Copula A Brief Description of the Youle Jino Copula* HAYASHI, Norihiko 1. Introduction As is widely known, a copula is a kind of linguistic unit that behaves quite peculiarly in every language. Most linguists believe that copulas are meaningless (Hengeveld 1992, Pustet 2003, Stassen 2005), hence that seems to be why some languages have no copulas, like Tagalog (Schachter 1985). Many Asian languages employ “copulaless” constructions to express the specificational/ predicational/ equative relationship between two noun phrases (hereafter, “NPs”). Even those languages that have “copulaless” constructions sometimes allow the copula(s) to occur in certain conditions, which might be referred to as “copularization”. However, such conditions vary from language to language. Youle Jino1 (the Lolo-Burmese branch of the Tibeto-Burman family, Xishuangbanna * An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 41st International Conference on Sino-Tibetan Languages and Linguistics held at SOAS (London, United Kingdom) on September 18th, 2008).The original title was “Copula in Youle Jino”. I thank Prof. Dr. Caroll Genetti for her insightful comments. All errors and misunderstandings are, of course, on my own. 1 The Jino language has two main dialects: Youle and Buyuan. Gai (1986) estimates that the ninety percent of the speakers speaks the Youle dialect and the remainder Buyuan. The total number of the Jino nationality amounts to 20,899 (2000 census). Dai et. al. (2007) reports the socio-linguistic situation of Youle Jino and concludes that Youle Jino is not currently threatened by linguistic endangerment. However, considering the fact that every new Jino generation has less and less knowledge of this language, the present author thinks that it is difficult to be optimistic about the future of Youle Jino. Phonological inventory and typological features of Youle Jino are briefly summarized below. [Phonological Inventory of Youle Jino]: Consonants: /q-!qi-!u-!ui-!l-!li;!ut-!uti-!u洪-!u洪i- v , v h; n-!n前-!o-!o前-!規-!規前-!棄-!棄;前 m-m前; g-!w-!t-!{-!洪-!s-!D-!k-!y-!! 雫- (x)/ Vowels: /j-!f-!P-!え-!Î-!b-!ｉ-! -!竺-!p-!翰-!v/ Tonemes: /66-!55-!44-!46-!53/ Syllable Structure: (C1)(C2)V1(V2)(V3)(C3)/T <C2: -r- or -j-, C3: -n or -N> /m,m前, n,n前/ can be syllabic nasals. As for the Youle Jino phonology, see Hayashi (2007, 2009). [Typological Features of Youle Jino]: Basic Constituent Order: SOV, Noun-Adjective, Possessive-Head Noun, Relative Clause-Head Noun 絓緱絙 1 HAYASHI, Norihiko Jinghong [Yunnan, China]) has one copula, namely Oß66. As in many other languages, Oß66!is also a verb but behaves in a rather different way from other “ordinary” verbs. This paper aims to provide a brief description of the Youle Jino copula Oß66 and analyze what motivates copularization in this language using first-hand data2. 2. Previous Works ＿ Gai (1986) According to a previous study of Youle Jino by Gai (1986), there are four allomorphs relating to the copula: Oｉ53-!Oｉ55-!Oｉ46-!and!OB66/!He says that each variant is employed in different semantic contexts, although his explanation is somewhat insufficient. Gai’s examples and analyses are briefly summarized below. 棋![Oｉ53sOｉ55] !糫 If the copula occurs with a negative or an interrogative marker, its tone changes to 44 tone, as in (1).! (1) a. f44!!竺44!!!!!oｉ53!!!!!!!!!!qｉ53!!tf66!!nF66!!n 55!!O Oｉ55!B/ this PART 2SG.NOM hit kill PART NEG COP “This is not what you hit to death.” (Gai 1986: 54) 糫 b. f44!!竺44!!!!!oｉ53!!!!!!!!!!qｉ53!!tf66!!nF66!!O Oｉ55!F!!mB53!? this PART 2SG.NOM hit kill PART COP Q “Is this what you hit to death?” (Gai 1986: 54) Morphological Features: Agglutinative (Verbal Complex) 2 The present author has been carrying out linguistic research on the Jino language in a Jino village since 2000. I would like to thank Ms. Wang Azhen, who kindly taught me this language. She was born and grew up in the Jino village and is a fluent speaker of Jino and the Jinghong-Yunnan dialect of Chinese. Both of her parents are Jino and they are also my consultants. I would like to express my deepest gratitude to them. The study of the present author on the Jino language has been supported by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (2003 and 2005), Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from Japan Society for the Promotion of Science for the project entitled “Linguistic Substratum in Tibet” headed by Yasuhiko Nagano (2004 and 2007, 2008), Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from Japan Society for the Promotion of Science for the project entitled “Linguistic Description of the Jino language and the study of Language Contact and Linguistic Typology contrasting other neighboring languages” (2009).This paper is mainly based on the data which I collected (2004–2009). 絓緹絙 2 A Brief Description of the Youle Jino Copula 棋![Oｉ53sOｉ46] If the copula occurs in affirmative sentences, its tone changes to 35 tone, as in (2). (2) !!! f44!!竺44!!!!!oｉ53!!!!!!!!!!qｉ53!!tf66!!nF66!!O Oｉ46!B/ this PART 2SG.NOM hit kill PART COP “This is what you hit to death.” (Gai 1986: 54) 棋![Oｉ53sOB66] If the copula occurs in exclamative sentences, its form changes to OB66, as in (3). OB66!/ (3) !!!uTB53mpf66! f44!!竺44!!!!!oｉ53!!!!!!!!!!qｉ53!!tf66!!nF66!!O Oh! this PART 2SG.NOM hit kill PART COP “Oh! This is what you hit to death.” (Gai 1986: 54) 棋![Oｉ53] If the copula occurs in declarative sentences, its tone does not change, as in (4). (4) !! f44!!竺44!!!!!oｉ53!!!!!!!!!!qｉ53!!tf66!!nF66!!O Oｉ53!B/! this PART 2SG.NOM hit kill PART COP “This is what you hit to death.” (Gai 1986: 55) The above examples seem to highlight the differences in tone, which according to Gai may correspond to modality3. However, there are some problems in his analysis. According to my field notes, tonal alternation can usually occur irrespective of modality difference. It is difficult to predict, especially in the verbal complex. The present author is not investigating the relationship between the tonal alternation of the Youle Jino copula and modality difference. In addition, Gai describes only the morphophonological features of the Youle Jino copula, but does not explain its occurrence from morphosyntactic and semantic perspectives. Hereafter this paper aims to describe the syntactic and semantic features of the Youle In my field notes also, there are a certain number that are of examples of Ob66, but at this point the present author considers that it is a kind of amalgamation— that is, O翰66!+b. 3 絓縈絙 3 HAYASHI, Norihiko Jino copula and analyze what motivates its occurrence. 3. Formal Description In this section, the characteristics of the Youle Jino copula O翰55 4 will be syntactically or formally described in two contexts: O翰55 following NP and O翰55 following non-NP. 3.1 O翰55 following NP The Youle Jino copula O翰55 frequently occurs after NPs to denote specificational, predicational, and equative relationships between two NPs, as in (5). (5) a. Dj44 sj44qfo46!utiｉ44{ 66!OO翰44-oÎ55/! !!!!!!!!!!!!!this Japan people COP-SFP “This is a Japanese people.” O翰44-oÎ55/! 糫 b. mj44zvo53!!utiª44{ 66!!mb66yG55!O !!!!!!!!!!!Liyun (PSN) person big COP-SFP “Liyun is a big person.” c. qv66u iF66=kｉ55!!!!!!lj66oƒp66!!!!!nƒc66uTiｉ55!!u F53-k 66" " " O翰44-oÎ55/! !!!!!!!!!!Tai Lue people=and Jino people friend very-good COP-SFP “Tai Lue people and Jino people are very good friends.” In (5), the copula O翰66!with the sentence-final particle -oÎ55!gives the sentence a predicate construction. In (5a), NP1 is Dj44 and NP2 is sj44qfo46!utiｉ44{ 66. In (5b), NP1 is mj44zvo53!and NP2 is utiｉ44{ 66!!mb66yG55. In addition, in (5c), NP1 is qv66u iF66=kｉ55!!!!!!lj66oƒp66!and NP2 is nƒc66uTiｉ55!!u F53-k 66. The copula clearly expresses the relationship between the two NPs. However, in the following example, if the relationship between the NPs can be construed from a semantic and a pragmatic viewpoint, the copula should be considered to occur optionally. The tone of Youle Jino copula usually alters, such as O翰44~!O翰46~O翰66~!O翰53. This paper recognizes that the basic tone is 55 and there is no semantic difference in tonal variations of the copula. 4 絓縑絙 4 A Brief Description of the Youle Jino Copula (6) Dj55!!!sj44qfo46!!!!utiª44{‹66.! this Japan.OBL people “This is a Japanese people.” In (6), the relationship between NP1 and NP2 can be easily construed from the context, hence the copula is not necessary; however, this is not the case in negative sentences, as illustrated in (8) below. In (7), which is considered to be an example of a pseudo-cleft sentence, the NPs in the focus position (the underlined elements) can be followed by the copula O翰66/!! (7) a. liG55!!u F44yvo46-nG66!!mbp44ub46!!!!!!!!!O Oß44-oÎ55/! that marry- NML the oldest child COP-SFP “That person who married is his/her oldest child.” b. b44Ov66!!!!!!!!!!Dj66-mp55!!liÎ44-nG55!!Dj66-mp55!!O Oß44=F55/! 1PL.INCL.NOM this-like do-NML this-like COP=POSS “It is in this way that we do.” c. n55uTj55!!lF44-nG66!!nj44uib66!!yp44-nG46!!!!!!O Oß44-oÎ55/ ground slide- NML rain (n.) rain (v.)-PAST COP-SFP “Why the land slid is because it rained.” On the one hand, the relationship between NP1 and NP2 in affirmative sentences can be expressed by copulaless constructions (that is, with no overt copulas) as in (6), but on the other hand, the relationship in sentences with the tense/ aspect/ modality markers must be expressed by the copula. The following examples (8)-(11) are copulative sentences with the tense/ aspect/ modality markers. [negative: m -] (8) a. lbo66utibp44qikfo46!!!!!!!n‹44-Oß66-b55/! Gancaopian (drug name) NEG-COP-PART “(That) is not a Gancaopian [medicine for a cough].” 絓縕絙 5 HAYASHI, Norihiko b. qb66u‹55=b55!!!!!n‹44-Oß66-b55/! !!!!! Baduo (PLN)=VA NEG-COP-PART “(That) is not Baduo [PLN].” c. liG55!n‹44-Oß66-nG53-!!Ob66wv55!!!!!!!!!!kjo44obo44=F66!!! that NEG-COP-COND 1PL.EXCL.NOM Yunnan=POSS Tbp46tv46njo44utv44!qiv44uipO44yvb46!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!n‹66-qkb53/! minority Putonghua (standard Chinese) NEG-speak “Otherwise, we minorities of Yunnan do not speak Putonghua.” [past: -nG!~ -nF] (9) Oß44-nF46/! a. mj44D‹66!!!!!!!!!!!O four hundred COP-PAST “(What he gave me) was four hundred yen.” b. l‹44-lj66!!mj44-kfo46!!!!O Oß44-nF46/ each-CL four-yen COP-PAST “It was four yen per five hundred grams.” c.kj66Tj66!!!!!!!!!n‹66-qbo44-wv55-!!Ob66wv55!!!!!!!!uij66nƒb66!!O Oß44-nF46/! the former days NEG-move-RES 1PL.EXCL.NOM many COP-PAST “When I did not move (here), (the members of) our family amount to many.” [perfect: -xa] (10) a. O‹44utiG66likp44-nƒk‹66!Oß44-y‹53-!!!!O‹46=kª66!!!!!!!!!uij44uTi‹66!! fifty six-CL COP-COND 1SG.OBL=and same Oß44-yb55/!! COP-PFT “If (your father) is fifty-five years old, then he is as old as I!” Oß44-nF66!!OOß44-yb66/! b. !!oF46!!!!!!O 2SG.OBL COP-NML COP-PFT “(Those things) have become yours.” 絓縠絙 6 A Brief Description of the Youle Jino Copula [experience: -t‹] (11) Oß46-u‹55-b55/! a. {‹66lv66!!T翰66-l 55-nG55!!!nj66oƒb55!!!!O child take-PROG-NML Mina (PSN) COP-EXP-PART “The person who is taking a child is Mina (as is expected).” Oß46-u‹55-b55/ b. b66lf66+l 66uP55=G55!!uij44uTi‹46!!O clothes+clothes=TOP same COP-EXP-PART “Clothes are the same as other minorities (as is expected).” c. qsb44-nkª53-!!uŠj46- 55/!!!mj44-ut翰66!!!O Oß46-u‹55-b55/! chop-SEQ slice-PART 4-CL COP-EXP-PART “After (we) chop the tree, then we will slice it (with a sword). There are four (trees) left.” As shown above in (8)-(11), the copula follows NP2 and expresses the relationship between NP1 (or nominalized element) and NP2, though in some cases NP1 is covert in the sentence (for instance, 8a, 9a, 10b, 11c, etc.). Underlined forms in each example, namely n‹--!-nG!~!-nF-!!-nf-!-yb-!-v‹." are all tense/ aspect/ modality markers that cannot be directly attached to nominals. They are all verbal affixes, hence they require verbal roots when attached. Noun phrases can construct sentences by themselves in Youle Jino, but in order to express tense/ aspect/ modality, the copula Oß66!is obligatory. 3.2 Oß55 following non-NP The copula is naturally more likely to occur after NPs, but it is important to note that in Youle Jino the copula can occur after non-NPs. Firstly, it should be pointed out that there are examples where a noun phrase and a citation form of adjective can be linked by the copula, as in (12). (12) a. Dj55+q‹55!!!!T‹44lij66!!b44lsP66!!O Oß44-oÎ55/! this+around foot slippery “It is slippery here.” 絓繇絙 7 COP-SFP HAYASHI, Norihiko b. o‹44up66!!b66utiG66!!Oß44-oÎ55/ nose stuffed up COP-SFP “(My) nose is stuffed up.” c. ukbp46+kv55-nG55!!O‹66uG66!!uｉ44np44!b44˚j66 Oß44-oÎ55/ fish (v.)+take-REL fish (n.) all small COP-SFP “The fish that (we) fished are all small.” Youle Jino adjectives consist of a nominalizing prefix (b-, mb-, k‹-) and a stative verbal root, hence they should be considered to belong to a subclass of verb. In (12), all three sentences allow the occurrence of Oß66!after the citation form of adjectives, which makes us view these examples as sentences with the copula following non-NPs. It may be true in a sense, but the citation form of adjectives behaves like a nominal since it is already nominalized; hence its occurrence with the copula should rather be likened to the case of the copula following NPs. In these cases, the copula Oß66!!functions as predicator of the sentence. Secondly, we should note that the Youle Jino copula can occur after the verbal complex. When expressing so-called “relative tense”, Youle Jino makes the copula carry the past suffix -nG!~-nF. (13) a. mP66!!qb66lib53!!!!!Tß66+mf53-nf55!!!O Oß44-nF46/ that Baka (PLN) take+go-FUT COP-PAST “(If you did not go back from here), (we) would have taken you to the Baka village.” b. nj66utp66!!!Tß66+u j46+mf55-nf55!O Oß44-nF46/ firewood take+slice+go-FUT COP-PAST “(If he did not go to Mengyang early in the morning,) we would have taken him to go to slice firewood.” Both sentences in (13) express the expectation in the past, and in the end denote the counterfactual meaning. The copula Oß66!seemingly follows the non-NP ending with the future suffix -nf, but it should be noted that both the past tense marker -nG!~-nF 絓繢絙 8 A Brief Description of the Youle Jino Copula and the future tense marker !-nf act as nominalizer5 in Youle Jino morphosyntax. If we posit that the phrase ending with a nominalizer is a kind of NP, the phrase preceding the copula Oß66!!in (13) should be considered as a NP, and therefore (13) should be described in 3.1 from a syntactic perspective. Thirdly, we should mention that there are several examples where the copula can occur directly after the verbal complex, forming what appears to be a serial verb construction. (14) a.!kb44kfo66!nbp44!!!!!!!!!!O Oß44=F66-qp53/! opium swirl (head) COP=POSS-RCF “(Their heads) may swirl (by smoking) opium.” b. b44qkp66!mª55-uF66-l‹55!!!!!!!!!!!!!O Oß44=F66!!!!uG66-‹55-!! book all the way-look-PROG n‹44-kj66-b55/! COP=POSS probably-PART NEG-sleep-PART “(I assume that) you probably keep reading books without sleeping.” As is illustrated in (14), the copula Oß66!directly follows the verbal complex. In (14a), nbp44 “swirl (head)” is a verb, hence it might be assumed that the string nbp44!Oß44 forms a verb serialization. Moreover, in (14b), mª55-uF66-l‹55!“all the way-look-PROG” is also a verbal complex, so that mª55-uF66-l‹55!Oß44!could be considered to be a serial verb construction. However, this is not the case. In natural conversation in Youle Jino, as in (14), the copula Oß66!often occurs directly after the non-NP in order to express the speaker’s modality or his/ her own ideas. 4. Discussions and Analyses From Synchronic, Typological, and Areal Perspectives In section 3, the occurrence of the Youle Jino copula has been described formally, whereas in this section, it will be discussed and analyzed from much wider perspectives, namely, synchronic, typological, and areal ones. -nG!~-nF! functions as nominalizer, complementizer, relativizer, and past tense marker. As for the polyfunctionality of -nG!~-nF, see Hayashi (2006). 5 絓繮絙 9 HAYASHI, Norihiko 4.1 Morphosyntactic Motivation In this subsection, copularization in Youle Jino will be analyzed from the point of view of syntactic motivation. In Youle Jino, the tense/ aspect/ modality affixes can only be added to the verbal root. Therefore, for instance, if we wish to express the past state of the relationship between two NPs, we must employ a verb that is able to carry the past tense suffix, although this verb should not have a content meaning. Hence, it should be a copula. Examples (8)-(11) illustrate this phenomenon. What is more, the tense suffixes, namely -nG~ -nF and -nf, occupy the same slot in the verbal complex, hence if we use both suffixes at the same time in a sentence, we must set up a copula to carry either suffix, as was illustrated in (13). From a typological perspective (Pustet 2003), copulas tend to follow or precede nouns, whereas they do not easily follow or precede verbs. On the one hand, the most frequent case in Youle Jino is the occurrence of Oß66 directly after NPs; Oß66!can also occur directly after the citation form of adjectives, which syntactically behaves in the same way as nouns. (15) a. {‹66lv66!!b44˚j66!!!{l/ Oß44-oÎ55}/ child small {l/ COP-SFP} “The child is small.” b. l‹66uP55!!!b44oƒG66!{l/ Oß44-oÎ55}/! clothes red {l/ COP-SFP} “The clothes are red.” As in (15), the copula can occur after the citation form of adjectives, for example b44˚j66!and!b44oƒG66, although in these examples the copulaless construction sounds more natural.! On the other hand, it is difficult for Oß66!to follow the verb phrases, although there are some examples in which it does, as in (14). According to my field notes, there is a gradience of acceptability in the examples where O翰66!follows the verbs. 絓緱緫絙 10 A Brief Description of the Youle Jino Copula (16) a. nj66T‹66oƒ55!!u jO44ypO55!!mf44-nf46!!!O Oß44=F55/! tomorrow Jinghong go-FUT COP=POSS Oß44=F55/! b. nj66T‹66oƒ55!!u jO44ypO55!!mf44=F66!!!O tomorrow Jinghong go=POSS COP=POSS c. [?/OK] nj66T‹66oƒ55!!u jO44ypO55!!mf44!!!O Oß44=F55/! tomorrow Jinghong go COP=POSS “He/She will probably go to Jinghong tomorrow.” (17) a. Dj55!!b66lf66!!!nsF66+nsF46-b55/! this dish delicious+delicious.RDP-PART “This dish is very delicious.” O翰44=F55/! b. Dj55!!b66lf66!!!nsF44-nƒG46-b55!!O this dish delicious-AUX-PART COP=POSS c. [?/OK] Dj55!!b66lf66!!!nsF66+nsF46!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!O O翰44=F55/ this dish delicious+delicious.RDP COP=POSS “This dish is probably delicious.” In (16), (16a) is the most acceptable. (16b) sounds more natural than (16c), although the latter is not completely unacceptable. In (16a) and (16b), the elements before the copula end with the future suffix -nf and the possessive marker =F55, which syntactically function as a nominalizer. Hence, the copula can easily follow elements ending with these suffixes. On the other hand, in (16c), the element before the copula is a verb, making this sentence less acceptable than the two previous ones. This holds true in (17). (17a) and (17b, c) have different readings respectively, although the latter two sentences can be semantically construed as the same. The former has fewer modality readings, whereas the latter two have high modality6. In (17b), the element before the copula ends with the particle -b, which generally marks the end of the nominal predicate, while in (17c), the element is a reduplicated verb, which syntactically precedes the copula with a lot of difficulty. In summary, from a morphosyntactic perspective, since the tense/ aspect/ modality markers are verbal affixes, the Youle Jino copula is employed to carry them. And in 6 The fact that the Youle Jino copula can function as a high-modality marker will be discussed and analyzed in 4.2.1. 絓緱緱絙 11 HAYASHI, Norihiko addition, the Youle Jino copula can follow nouns and the citation form of adjectives much more easily than it can follow verbs. 4.2 Semantic and Pragmatic Motivation In this subsection, we will investigate how the occurrence of the Youle Jino copula should be semantically and pragmatically motivated from three dimensions. 4.2.1 Characterizational/ Identificational or High Modality/ Low Modality --- with reference to Thai linguistic studies --- The occurrence of the Youle Jino copula shall be related not only to syntactic conditions, but also to semantic ones. In Southeast Asian languages, copulas are chosen by semantic conditions rather than by syntactic or formal ones. ! Previous works (Kuno and Wongkhomthong 1981, Mikami 1985, Komolwanig and Sawada 1993, Takahashi and Shinzato 20037) have been published on the two copulas of Standard Thai, namely lißß!and!qfo. In Standard Thai, a copula is inserted between the two NPs, that is, [NP1--Copula--NP2]. Kuno and Wongkhomthong and Mikami state that qfo (coined as C-Copula) characterizes the features of NP1 as NP2, whereas lißß (coined as I-Copula) identifies NP1 as NP2. Mikami investigates the notion that NP1 in the lißß sentences should be either non-referential or referential, while NP1 in the qfo sentences should be referential. Moreover, he argues that NP2 in the qfo sentences should be non-referential. Komolwanig and Sawada point out that Mikami’s analysis is somewhat problematic in that he did not define the concepts “referential” and “non-referential” clearly, and that the difference between lißß and qfo should be analyzed from a contextual viewpoint rather than the semantic one that he adopts. Komolwanig and Sawada claim that qfo involves <HIGH MODALITY> and lißß involves <LOW MODALITY>, given that qfo co-occurs with modal elements, 7 Takahashi and Shinzato (2003) employs the cognitive psychological concepts (though actually they do not present any experimental data) to reveal their difference and concludes that qfo relates to thought-like processing, whereas lißß!to sensation. Their idea may be plausible in the analysis of Standard Thai copulas, but this paper has not made psychological experiments on the usage of Youle Jino copula, hence this point of view will not be discussed any further here. 絓緱緹絙 12 A Brief Description of the Youle Jino Copula while lißß does not. These previous works on Standard Thai copulas may be useful for the semantic and pragmatic analysis of the Youle Jino copula, but it should be noted that Youle Jino has only one copula, Oß66; we therefore need to investigate to what extent the presence and absence of Oß66 correspond to qfo and lißß in Standard Thai. Firstly, Kuno and Wongkhomthong and Mikami mention the relationship between the specificity/ referentiality of the NPs and the choice of copula in the Thai language. Also, in other languages, Nishiyama (2003) discusses this relationship in Japanese semantics and pragmatics, and Mikkelsen (2005) investigates it from typological and theoretical perspectives. However, it is safe to say that the occurrence of the Youle Jino copula is not related to the specificity/ referentiality of the NPs, as will be shown in (18)-(20). (18) a. Tfo46uTiGO55!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!u kO44ypO55!!!!!!!!!!!!{l/ Oß44-oÎ55}/ center of the prefecture Jinghong (PLN) {l/ COP-SFP} “The center of the prefecture is Jinghong.” b. O‹46!!!!!!!!m‹44tj66!!!uTª66qª55!!!!!!!!{l/ Oß44-oÎ55}/! 1SG.OBL teacher Zhebai (PSN) {l/ COP-SFP} “My teacher is Zhebai.” (19) a. liG44q‹55!!yf66-u‹55-nG55!!!b66tbo55!!!!!{l/ Oß44-oÎ55}/ over there stand-EXP-REL Asan (PSN) {l/ COP-SFP} “The person standing over there is Asan.” b. liG44q‹55!!lib44+m 66-l‹55-nG55!!!uTª66qª55!!!!!{l/ Oß44-oÎ55}/ over there pass+come-PROG-REL Zhebai (PSN) “The person coming from there is Asan.” (20) a. uTª66qª55!!!!!!li‹66qi‹66!!!{l/ Oß44-oÎ55}/ Zhebai (PSN) adult man {l/ COP-SFP} “Zhebai is an adult man.” b. Dj66v55!!!liG53!!!m‹44tj66!!!{l/ Oß44-oÎ55}/! now he/she teacher {l/ COP-SFP} “Now he/she is a teacher.” 絓緱縈絙 13 {l/ COP-SFP} HAYASHI, Norihiko In (18)-(20), both the copulative and copulaless constructions are grammatical and acceptable, although the former sound slightly more natural. Using Mikami’s terms, in (18), NP1 is “non-referential” and NP2 is “referential”. In (19), both NP1 and NP2 are “referential”. In (20), NP1 is “referential” and NP2 is “non-referential”. According to Mikami’s analysis, in Standard Thai (also in Lao and Cambodian), I-Copula (lißß!in Standard Thai) should be employed in (18) and (19)8, while C-Copula (qfo in Standard Thai) is preferred in (20)9. However, as seen in (18)-(20), the referentiality of the NPs is not related to the occurrence of the Youle Jino copula. Therefore, Mikami’s analysis may not be applicable here. Secondly, we will investigate whether the analysis of Thai copulas by Komolwanig and Sawada is applicable to the analysis of the Youle Jino copula. As mentioned above, Komolwanig and Sawada conclude that qfo involves <HIGH MODALITY> and lißß <LOW MODALITY>, on the grounds that qfo co-occurs with modal elements, while lißß does not. If we refer to their analysis, the presence of the Youle Jino copula may involve <HIGH MODALITY>, and its absence <LOW MODALITY>. As modal elements of Youle Jino can only be affixed to the verbal roots, and the Youle Jino copula Oß66!is a member of the verb category, the Youle Jino copula must involve In Standard Thai, if NP2 is <referential>, I-Copula (lißß) should be employed (Mikami 1985). Following examples are glossed and transliterated by the present author. i) nßbO!mv'bO!!li‹‹O!!z„̲jqvo!!lißß!uppljbx!!![Standard Thai] capital of Japan COP Tokyo “The capital of Japan is Tokyo.” ii)!!!!!!!!lipo!!!!!ui„̲j!!!!z翰翰o!!!!zv%v!!!ui„̲j!!!!!!!ob̲o!!!!lißß!!!livo!A [Standard Thai] person REL stand stay PART there COP Mr./Ms. A “The person standing over there is Mr./ Ms. A” On the one hand, in (i), NP1 is <non-referential>, while NP2 is <referential>. On the other hand, in (ii), both NP1 and NP2 are <referential>. Hence, lißß is employed in both examples. 9 In Standard Thai, if NP1 is <referential> and NP2 is <non-referential>, C-Copula (qfo) should be employed (Mikami 1985). The following example is glossed and transliterated by the present author. i) lipo!!!obAo!!!qfo!!!!!lisvv!!!!![Standard Thai] person that COP teacher “That person is a teacher.” In (i), NP1 is <referential> and NP2 is <non-referential>, hence qfo is employed here. 8 ! 絓緱縑絙 14 A Brief Description of the Youle Jino Copula <HIGH MODALITY>10, not only from semantic and pragmatic perspectives, but also from morphosyntactic ones. (21) a.!!lbo66utibp44qikfo46!!!!!!!n‹44-Oß66-b55/!!!(=8a)! Gancaopian (drug name) NEG-COP-PART “(That) is not a Gancaopian [medicine for a cough].” b. *lbo66utibp44qikfo46!!!!!!!n‹44!22. Since the negative prefix is a verbal affix, (21a), in which it is affixed to the copula, is grammatical; however, (21b), in which it is not, is ungrammatical. Hence, in general, the Youle Jino copula involves <HIGH MODALITY>, and copulaless constructions <LOW MODALITY>. The tense and aspect markers basically behave in the same way as modality markers in this language, therefore cases with tense and aspect markers can be included in <HIGH MODALITY>. In natural conversation data, there are many examples where the copula co-occurs with the possessive marker =F55 to express the speaker’s viewpoint or modality, as is briefly mentioned at the end of 4.1. (22) a.!lj66oƒp66=F66!!!!!!O Oß66=F66!!!uTiG44-b55/! Jino people=POSS COP=POSS similar-PART “(She) seems to be a Jino people.” b. Ob66wF66!!!!!!!!n‹46-b55/!!!!!!!!!kp44nƒb66=F66!!!O Oß44=F66!!uTiG44-b55/! 1PL.EXCL.OBL NEG.COP-PART 3PL.NOM=POSS COP=POSS simiar-PART “It is not at our house (that the telephone is ringing). Maybe it is at their house.” 10 Zhang (2005) also, using the data of Sino-Tibetan languages spoken in China, claims that the copulative construction involves speaker’s viewpoint or modality, though the way of analysis is rather different from Komolwanig and Sawada (1993). 11 In the natural conversation of Youle Jino, the form n 46-b55!is frequently employed and the former element n 46 can be analyzed as a fusion form of negative n - and the copula O翰66, which is deserved to be noticed. 絓緱縕絙 15 HAYASHI, Norihiko (23) a. liP44nkª66!uij44-qiv55!O Oß44=F66!!!!!uG66-‹55/ then 1-CL COP=POSS surely-PART “Then, (they) surely (live in) the same village (as ours).” b.!lib66lGj55!!!b66liG66=mb66!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Ob66wv55=b55!!!!!!!uij44qkv46! Hani people Ake people=in other words 1PL.EXCL.NOM=VA together Oß44=F66!!!!!!uG66-‹55/ COP=POSS surely-PART “The Hani people and the Ake people maybe enjoy (the new year festival) the same way as we (Jino people).” (24) a. kF66nf55-nƒb66!!!!Tbp44ypO44!!!!!!!!kp44nƒb66!!!!uij66nƒb66 !Yanmei (PSN)-PL Xiaohong (PSN) 3PL.NOM lv44-Oß66=F55/ many again-COP=POSS “There surely go again a lot of Yanmei and Xiaohong’s friends.” b. b66˚ª66!!n44-nß46-nF66!!!O Oß44=F55/! self(3) CAUS-ring-PAST COP=POSS “I am sure that he/she rang it by himself/ herself.” Oß44=F55/! c.!u bp66+uv46!!!!!!!!!n‹46-b55-!!!!!!!!!b44Tß66!!O water (v.)+go out NEG.COP-PART yellow COP=POSS “If you do not water (the gray wax gourds), they will grow yellow.” In (22), the speaker’s guess is expressed by the phrase Oß66/ Oß44=F66!!!uTiG44-b55, while in (23), his/her strong assumption is expressed by the phrase Oß44=F66!!!uG66-‹55. Each example contains the other phrases (uTiG44-b55, uG66-‹55), which express the strength of the speaker’s assumption; however, even if the phrases following the copula do not occur, the speaker’s assumption or guess can be expressed, as in (24). Example (25) below illustrates that the phrase Oß44=F55!can express the speaker’s question. (25) a. b66mb53!!!libp53=F55!!qb53-nF55!!O Oß44=F55-!!lsp44!?! Oh what=POSS hold-PAST COP=POSS gun “Oh my god! Why did (he) bring a gun?” 絓緱縠絙 16 A Brief Description of the Youle Jino Copula b. tv66Tbp44G46=F66!!!{‹66lv66!!O Oß44=F55!? Suxiaoe (PSN)=POSS child COP=POSS! “Is (he) Suxiaoe’s child?” Both sentences in (25) can be considered as a kind of interrogative sentence, although the construction is the same as (24). This reinforces the idea that the copula can mark the speaker’s modality, but the context may play a part in determining what kind of modality is expressed by the copula. ! In addition, the fact that the Youle Jino copula can be employed to reply to the previous utterance supports the notion of its involvement in <HIGH MODALITY>. (26) Oß44-b55-uf53/ a. ‹53-!O Oh COP-PART-PART “Oh, that’s right!” b. Oß44-b55-uf53/!!O‹53!!!!!!!Tj46+kb66-y‹53-!!n‹66-lvbo44+mb66=F55/ COP-PART-PART 1SG.NOM die+go-COND NEG-care+come=POSS “That’s right. If I pass away, (I) cannot care about (her anymore).” (27) a. n‹44-Oß66-b55/!Dj66-mp55!!Tj46-nF66!!Oß66- 55/ NEG-COP-PART this-like die-PAST COP-PART “That is not true. It is when (you) die like this.” b. n‹44-Oß66-y‹53-!wbj46!!!n‹44-likv66-b55/! NEG-COP-COND quick NEG-AUX-PART “(If you live in the village, you will be able to speak Jino.) If not, (you) will not be able to (master it so) quickly.” Both (26) and (27) are replies to the previous utterance. In (26), the speaker employs the copula to agree with the previous speaker. In (27), the speaker uses the negative prefixed copula to deny the proposition of the previous utterance. Each case illustrates that the copula expresses the speaker’s viewpoint or modality. As seen in 3.2, in the natural conversation data, there are numerous examples where the copula follows the verbal elements to express the speaker’s viewpoint or modality, although the modality markers in Youle Jino can be directly affixed to the verbal root. 絓緱繇絙 17 HAYASHI, Norihiko To summarize, the Youle Jino copula can generally be employed to mark the speaker’s modality. 4.2.2 Temporal/ Permanent Dichotomy In many languages with more than one copula, the function of copulas differs in temporal/ permanent dichotomy. Some argue that such dichotomy can be paraphrased as changeable/ stable. In the literature of some European languages, such dichotomy is applicable, for example, tfs/ ftubs in Spanish and jt/ ubA in Irish, both of which date back to two Latin copulas, fttf/ tub$sf. The next two examples, (28, 29), will illustrate that temporality may relate to the occurrence of the Youle Jino copula. (28) a. xbO46m‹44tj66!!!!!!!!!li‹66qi‹66/! Mr. Wang (teacher) man b. xbO46m‹44tj66!!!!!!!!!li‹66qi‹66!!Oß44-oÎ55. Mr. Wang (teacher) man COP-SFP “Mr. Wang (teacher) is a(n adult) man.” (29) a. xbO46m‹44tj66!!!!!!!!kp44lib44/ Mr. Wang (teacher) old b. xbO46m‹44tj66!!!!!!!kp44lib44 Mr. Wang (teacher) old Oß44-oÎ55/ COP-SFP “Mr. Wang (teacher) is old.” From a grammatical viewpoint, all of the sentences in (28) and (29) are correct. However, from semantic and pragmatic perspectives, (28a) is preferable to (28b), whereas (29b) is preferable to (29a). This may be because human beings do not change their gender, whereas age is changeable or has a temporal feature. Naturally, there are some “challenging” examples. (30) a. Dj55!utp44!!!b44Tj66/! this糫 house糫 new 絓緱繢絙 18 A Brief Description of the Youle Jino Copula b. Dj55!utp44!!!b44Tj66!!O Oß44-oÎ55/! this糫 house糫 new糫 COP-SFP “This house is new.” Both sentences in (30) are syntactically correct. Everything gets older as time goes by, hence these sentences can be considered to have a temporal context, so that (30b) would sound more natural. However, in fact, (30a) sounds slightly more natural than (30b). This is because the citation form of adjectives is usually placed at the predicate position without any elements. The reason why (30a) is more natural has nothing to do with temporality. The next example (31) should relate to temporality, although it is very similar to (30). (31) a. Dj55!!utp44!!Dj66v55!!b44Tj66/!tP44-nƒk‹66!!Oß44-y‹53-!b44mƒj66/! this house now new three-CL COP-COND old Oß44-oÎ55/!! b.Dj55!!utp44!!Dj66v55!!b44Tj66!O this house now new COP-SFP tP44-nƒk‹66!Oß44-y‹53-!!!b44mƒj66/ three-CL COP-COND old “Now, this house is new. (But) in three years, (it will) be old.” According to my linguistic consultant’s intuition, (31b) sounds more natural than (31a). This example contains a temporal expression, namely Dj66v55 “now”, and the first sentence is contrasted with the second one. It should be pointed out that the clarification of temporality should cause the Youle Jino copula to occur naturally in (31b). This logic holds true in (32) and (33). (32) a. Dj55!!!b66tbo46=F66/ this Asan.OBL(PSN)=POSS this Asan.OBL(PSN)=POSS COP-SFP b. Dj55!!!b66tbo46=F66!!!!!!!!!!O O翰44-oÎ55/ “This is Asan’s (stuff).” 絓緱繮絙 19 HAYASHI, Norihiko (33) a. Dj66v55!!Dj55!!!b66tbo46=F66/ Now this Asan.OBL(PSN)=POSS Now this Asan.OBL(PSN)=POSS COP-SFP O翰44-oÎ55/ b. Dj66v55!!Dj55!!!b66tbo46=F66!!!!!!!!!!O “This is Asan’s (stuff) now.” All four sentences in (32) and (33) are grammatical, but (32a) is preferable to (32b), while (33b) is preferable to (33a). On the one hand, in general, the affiliation of “stuff” cannot be changed; hence, as in (32a), the copula does not occur. The absence of the copula denotes permanence. On the other hand, in (33), which contains a temporal adverb Dj66v55 “now”, the presence of the copula, which denotes temporality, is preferable to its absence12. 12 The presence of the copula is almost always preferable to its absence when expressing temporality, but in a contrastive sentence this is not always so. i) Dj66v55!Dj55!!b66tbo55=F66/!!!!!!!oF44nƒk‹66!!liG46=F66!!!!!!!{‹66lv66=F66/ now this Asan (PSN)=POSS next year 3SG.OBL=POSS child=POSS Dj66v55!Dj55!!b66tbo55=F66!!!!!!!!!OOß44-oÎ55/!!!!oF44nƒk‹66!!!!liG46=F66!!! ii) opx this Asan (PSN)=POSS COP-SFP next year 3SG.OBL=POSS {‹66lv66=F66!OOß44-oÎ55/ child=POSS COP-SFP “This is Asan’s (stuff) now, but it will be his/her child’s next year.” According to my consultant’s intuition, (i) may be preferable to (ii), which might contradict the discussion above. It can be arguable that the contrastive sentences expressing the affiliation of a stuff are exceptions to temporality analysis of Youle Jino copula. On the other hand, we can add one more example of the contrastive sentence here. iii) Dj55!!tß66lip66-!!uip66lip66!!!n‹44-Oß66-b55/ this cucumber wax gourd NEG-COP-PART iv)!!!!!!Dj55!!tß66lip66!!O Oß44-oÎ55-!!uip66lip66!!!n‹44-Oß66-b55/ this cucumber COP-SFP wax gourd NEG-COP-PART “This is a cucumber, not a wax gourd.” Both (iii) and (iv) are contrastive sentences, and the former is preferable to the latter. In this case, NPs have the permanent feature, hence the absence of the copula in (iii) should be plausible in the temporality analysis. However, if we look at (i) and (iii) from the viewpoint of contrastive constructions, the absence of the copula may be affected by the same motivation. Pustet (2002) argues that Sgaw Karen (Karenic, Tibeto-Burman) copulas, nfxRû!and!lRA0, relate to autonomy vs. dependency dichotomy, and points out that lRA0!has contrastive reading when employed. The contrastive reading might involve the absence of Youle Jino copula, although it demands further research. 絓緹緫絙 20 A Brief Description of the Youle Jino Copula In summary, use of the Youle Jino copula O翰66!is preferred when expressing temporality, but the copula is generally omitted when expressing permanence. 4.2.3 Focus/ Non-Focus Dichotomy Many Sino-Tibetan languages employ copula(s) to mark focus elements (Li and Thompson 1981, Zhang 2005, etc.). In Mandarin Chinese, the elements between the copula ti„% and the particle ef can be construed as the focus in the sentence (Li and Thompson 1981, Chu 1987, etc.). In Youle Jino, the copula generally occurs to clarify the focus elements in the sentence, as in (34, 35). (34) a. kj66oƒ55!!!!!qb66lib53!!!!mf55-nG55!!b66tbo55/ yesterday Baka (PLN) go-NML Asan (PSN) yesterday Baka (PLN) go-NML Asan (PSN) COP-SFP b. kj66oƒ55!!!!!qb66lib53!!!!mf55-nG55!!b66tbo55!!!!O O翰44-oÎ55/ “It was Asan that went to the Baka village yesterday.” (35) a. kj66oƒ55!!!!!Ob66wv55!!!!!!!!!!!lp44+mb44-nG55!!m 66qp55/! yesterday 1SG.EXCL.NOM take+come-NML tea (leaf) b. kj66oƒ55!!!!!Ob66wv55!!!!!!!!!!!lp44+mb44-nG55!!m 66qp55!!O O翰44-oÎ55/ yesterday 1SG.EXCL.NOM take+come-NML tea (leaf) COP-SFP “It was tea leaf that we brought here yesterday.” Both (34) and (35) are pseudo-cleft sentences and prefer the occurrence of the copula (34b, 35b) to its absence (34a, 35a). b66tbo55!!⌘Asan” in (34) and m 66qp55! “tea leaf” in (35) are construed as the focus, which can be analyzed as new information in the discourse. In Youle Jino, the focus element can be considered to be preferably followed by the copula. However, it should be noted that in some cases the temporal/ permanent dichotomy defeats the focus/ non-focus one, as in (36) below. (36) a.[Question] Dj55!!!li‹66u ß55-b55? this what-Q ! !!!!!“What is this?” 絓緹緱絙 21 HAYASHI, Norihiko Dj55!!Ob44tß66/ b. [Answer 1] this banana ! !!!“This is a banana.” Oß44-nÎ44. c. [Answer 2] [?/OK] Dj55!!Ob44tß66!O this banana COP-SFP ! !!!“This is a banana.” Example (36) contains a question and two possible replies. The speaker in (36a) asks, “What is this?”, and each speaker in (36b) and (36c) answers, “This is a banana”. Therefore, the underlined NP in (36b, c), namely Ob44tß66, should be construed as the focus. If the focus/ non-focus account could be adopted in this case, (36c) would sound more natural than (36b). However, (36b) actually sounds more natural than (36c). This leads us to conclude that the temporal/ permanent account plays a more important role in determining whether the copula occurs or not. To summarize, use of the Youle Jino copula is also preferred to clarify the focus element in a sentence, although this is not always the case when the NP that is considered to have the permanent feature precedes it. 5. Conclusions As discussed above, this paper focuses on briefly describing the Youle Jino copula, and concludes that the occurrence of the copula can be related to the factors exemplified in (37) and (38). [Morphosyntactic Factor] (37) Verbal affixing [Semantic/ Pragmatic Factors] (38) a. High modality (<High modal context>) b. Temporality (<Temporal NP>) c. Focus (<Focus NP>) High modality, temporality, and focus belong to different dimensions; hence, in the present paper, unlike in other previous works on East and Southeast Asian languages, it 絓緹緹絙 22 A Brief Description of the Youle Jino Copula might be better not to conclude to which semantic/ pragmatic factor the occurrence of the Youle Jino copula is most related. However, it is arguable that the specificity or referentiality of NPs is not a determining factor for the occurrence of the Youle Jino copula, and that greater importance should be attached to temporality (that is, a permanent NP) rather than focus in establishing whether the copula occurs or not. This paper without doubt has residual issues. From a synchronic viewpoint, we should determine whether there is an internal hierarchy between high modality, temporality, and focus relating to the occurrence of the Youle Jino copula13. In addition, from a diachronic perspective, the Youle Jino copula may relate to the Burmese copula ivu, Hani O翰66!(Dai 1995), and Zaozou OF64 (Sun et al. 2002), but it is very difficult to link it genetically to the Tibetan copulas zjo/ sfe, Sgaw Karen nfxRû/!lRA0!(Pustet 2002) and so on14. Thurgood (1982) reconstructed *xªz!for the Proto-Sino-Tibetan copula, which is compatible with the Proto-Loloish form *xªz4 reconstructed by Bradley (1979); however, his reconstructed form might be related to the Youle Jino possessive marker =F55, which can occur at the sentence-final position as a modality marker15. It may be speculated that the Proto-Lolo-Burmese form of the copula can be reconstructed as *Ovu16, but this obviously requires further investigation. 13 There exists another synchronic problem. Clark (1996) argues that Vietnamese ui„% can function as an emphatic copula, along with the unmarked copula mb%. According to her analysis, Vietnamese ui„%!can be normally considered a conjunction, translatable like “be then”, but it is often employed for characterizing NPs. Youle Jino has an enclitic that is very similar to Vietnamese ui„%, namely =mb66, though its synchronic relationship and interface with the copula Oß66 would benefit from future research. 14 Lowes (2006) illustrates the geographical distribution of Tibeto-Burman copulas to investigate their phonological reconstruction, though her analysis is a still ongoing process. 15 On the morphosyntactic function and diachronic analysis of Youle Jino “possessive” marker =F55, see Hayashi (in print). 16 This proto-form can be attested in many Lolo-Burmese languages, such as Burmese ivu, Achang ˚ƒf066, Bola O u66, Zaiwa Ovu66, Yi (Nuosu) O翰44, Lisu OB44, Hani Oß66, and Jino Oß66. The data of Achang, Bola, Zaiwa, Yi (Nuosu), Lisu, and Hani are from Huang (1992: 543). Matisoff (2003) recontructed *s-rut for the PTB copula, which seems incompatible with the Youle Jino Oß66. 絓緹縈絙 23 HAYASHI, Norihiko Abbreviations (*) marks an ungrammatical sentence, (-) an affix or particle boundary, (=) a clific boundary,and (+) a root boundary. AUX : auxiliary, CL : classifier, COND : condition, EXCL : exclusive, EXP : experience, FUT : future, INCL : inclusive, NEG : negative, NML : nominalizer, NOM : nominative, NP: noun phrase, OBL : oblique, PART : particle, PAST : past, PFT : perfective, PL : plural, PLN : place name, POSS : possessive, PROG : progressive, PSN : person name, Q : question, RCF : reconfirmative, RDP : reduplication, REL : relative marker, RES : reason, SEQ : sequence, SFP : sentence final particle, SG : singular, TOP : topic, VA : =va55 (accusative, dative, locative) References Bradley, David 1979. Chu, Chauncey Proto-Loloish. London: Curzon Press. 1987. De as a Particle of Presupposition. In the Chinese Language Society of Hongkong (ed.), Wang Li Memorial Volumes. (English Volume) pp. 101—119. Hongkong: Joint Publishing. Clark, Marybeth 1996. Conjunction as copula in Vietnamese. Mon-Khmer Studies. 26: 319–331. Dai, Qingxia (纖棊署) 1995. Haniyu gailun. Kunming; Yunnan minzu chubanshe. [An introduction to the Hani language. (in Chinese)] Dai, Qingxia (ed.), 2007. Jinuozu yuyanshiyongxianzhuang ji qiyanbian. Beijing: Shangwu yinshuguan. [Language Vitality of the Jino Nationality: Current Situation and Changing Process (in Chinese)] Gai, Xingzhi ( 健φ) ! 1986. ! Jinuoyu jianzhi. Beijing: Minzuchubanshe. [An outline of the Jino language. (in Chinese)] Hayashi, Norihiko (詒 taisyou sinagara 檢) ! 2006. Tino-go -m竺" no takinousei Kanzou-go to . Kyoto Daigaku Gengogaku Kenkyuu (Kyoto University Linguistic Research). 25: 67–104. [ “Polyfunctionality” of Jino -mG Contrast with Sino-Tibetan languages (in Japanese)]! ——— 2007. ! Tino-go yuuraku-hougen no kizyututeki kenkyuu. (Ph.D dissertation, Kyoto University) [A Descriptive Study on the Youle Dialect of Jino. (in Japanese)] 絓緹縑絙 24 A Brief Description of the Youle Jino Copula ——— 2009. Tino-go bunpou (Yuuraku-hougen) no kizyutukenkyuu. Kobe: Research Institute of Foreign Studies, Kobe City University of Foreign Studies. [A Descriptive Studies on the Grammar of the Jino language (Youle Dialect). (in Japanese)] ——— in print. The so-called possessive marker in Youle Jino. In Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Sino-Tibetan Languages and Linguistics (book title undecided). Harbin: Heilongjiang University Press. Hengeveld, Kees 1992. Non-verbal Predication. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Huang, Bufan ( 摡 斷 坑 ) (ed) 1992. Zangmianyuzu yuyan cihui. Beijing: Zhongyangminzuxueyuan chubanshe. [A Tibeto-Burman Lexicon. (in Chinese and English)] Komolwanig, Kamol-orn and Naoko Sawada 1993. Meisizyutugobun no Niti/Tai Taisyou kenkyuu. --- Nintigoyouron-teki kanten kara—Gengo Kenkyu. 103: 92–116. [A Contrastive Study of Copulative Sentences in Japanese and Thai—from the viewpoint of cognitive pragmatics --- (in Japanese)] Kuno, Susumu and Preya Wongkhomthong 1981. Characterizational and Identificational Sentences in Thai. Studies in Language. 5.1: 65–109. Li, Charles N. and Sandra A. Thompson 1981. Mandarin Chinese—A Functional Reference Grammar—. Berkeley: University of California Press. Lowes, Gwendolyn 2006. Some Comparative Notes on Tibeto-Burman Copulas. Circulated at the 39th International Conference on Sino-Tibetan Languages and Linguistics, University of Washington (Seattle, Washington, USA, September 2006). Matisoff, James A. 2003. Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman—System and Philosophy of Sino-Tibetan Reconstruction— Berkeley: University of California Press. Mikami, Naomitsu (申疹 甜) 1985. Tai-go, Laosu-go, Kanbozia-go no Kopyura ni tuite. Keiou Gizyuku Daigaku Gengobunkakenkyuuzyo Kiyou. Vol. 17: 167–181. [On the copulas in Thai, Lao, and Cambodian. (in Japanese)] Mikkelsen, Line 2005. Copular Clauses 豨Specification, predication and equation 豨. Amstrerdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 絓緹縕絙 25 HAYASHI, Norihiko Nishiyama, Yuji ( 愾叢変) 2003. Nihon-go meisi-ku no imiron to goyouron meisi-ku to hisiziteki meisiku siziteki . Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo. [Semantics and Pragmatics of Japanese Noun Phrases Specific Noun Phrases and Non-Specific Noun Phrases . (in Japanese)] Pustet, Regina 2002. Copulas in Sgaw Karen. Studies in Language. Vol. 26. No.3: 595–612. ———2003. Copulas —Universals in the Categorization of the Lexicon—. Oxford: Oxford UniversityPress. Schachter, Paul 1985. Parts-of-speech system. In Timothy Shopen (ed), Language typology and syntactic description: Clause Structure. pp. 3–61. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Stassen, Leon 2005. Zero Copula for Predicate Nominals. In Martin Haspelmath et. al. (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures. pp. 486–489. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Sun, Hongkai (崕嶷梅) , Huang, Chenglong (杻癩瀹) and Zhou, Maocao (鳳鰆 2002. ) Rouruoyuyanjiu, Beijing: Zhongyangminzudaxue chubanshe. ([A Study on the Zauzou language] in Chinese) Takahashi, Kiyoko and Rumiko Shinzato 2003. On Thai Copulas, khUU1 and pen1: A Cognitive Approach. Proceedings of the 2nd Seoul International Conference on Discourse and Cognitive Linguistics: Discourse and Cognitive Perspectives on Human Language. pp. 131–145. Thurgood, Graham 1982. The Sino-Tibetan Copula *wª{0" " Cahiers de linguistique– Asie orientale. 11.1: 65–81 Zhang, Jun ) 殳 源 * 2005. Hanzangyuxiyuyan pangduanju yanjiu. Beijing: Zhongyangminzudaxue chubanshe. [A study on declarative sentences in Sino-Tibetan languages. (in Chinese)] 絓緹縠絙 26