Welcome to Academia

Sign up to get access to over 50 million papers

By continuing, you agree to our Terms of Use

Continue with Email

Sign up or log in to continue.

Welcome to Academia

Sign up to continue.

Hi,

Log in to continue.

Reset password

Password reset

Check your email for your reset link.

Your link was sent to

Please hold while we log you in

Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Homeschooling the Pros and Cons

Cite this paper

AI-generated Abstract

Homeschooling is a parent-directed educational practice that has existed for centuries. It is recognized as a legal option across many countries, offering an alternative to conventional public and private schooling. Advocates argue that homeschooling fosters a supportive environment conducive to intrinsic learning, enhances student confidence, and allows for social interaction and achievement. Historical instances of successful individuals who were homeschooled illustrate its potential effectiveness as an educational method.

1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction.....................…………………………………………………………………………………………………................3 2.  The Concept and History of Homeschooling……………………………….…………………………………………...........3 3. Pros of Homeschooling…………………………........……..................................................................................5 4.  Cons of Homeschooling…………………………………………………………………………………………….........................9 5. Conclusion............................................................................................................................................10 6. References……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...12 2 Introduction Homeschooling is a practice in which the education of children is parent- controlled or parent- directed (and sometimes student-directed) instead of teacher-directed, and is implemented at home rather than in a traditional public or private school setting. Consistent with other forms of school choice, homeschooling is an educational policy and practice that elicits strongly held views by advocates and opponents' alike Homeschooling is not a new concept. Homeschooling has been around for centuries in many different countries throughout the world. Our forefathers believed that public education would help sustain democracy. There would be shared values and shared concerns among an informed citizenry.  History has proven that there was nothing wrong with homeschooling and there still is nothing wrong with homeschooling. For many people, the public education system is fine (Dick M.,2012). However, many people feel that homeschooling is a better option for them and their children. Public education and homeschooling can survive and thrive side-by-side.  Homeschooling is legal in many countries. Countries with the most prevalent homeschooling movements include Australia, Canada, New Zealand, United Kingdom, and the United States.  The Concept and History of Homeschooling Home schooling is not a new phenomenon. In colonial days families, including wealthy ones, educated their children at home, combining the efforts of parents, tutors, and older children. The rural one-room schoolhouse was created by families that banded together to hire a teacher who could substitute for parents but who would use the same mixture of direct instruction, tutoring, and mentoring by older students. (Paul T. Hill,2000) Homeschooling is a form of private education that is parent led and home. Although prior to the introduction of compulsory school attendance laws, most childhood education occurred within the family or community, homeschooling in the modern sense is an alternative in developed countries to attending public or private schools. (Brian Ray, 2017). Homeschooling is a legal option for parents in many countries, allowing them to provide their children with a learning environment as an alternative to public or private schools outside the individual’s home. 3 Notable home schooled Americans include, for example, Presidents George Washington, John Quincy Adams, Abraham Lincoln, Theodore Roosevelt, Woodrow Wilson, and Franklin Delano Roosevelt. Other successful products of American home schooling include jurists Patrick Henry, John Jay, and John Marshall, inventor Thomas Edison, General Robert E. Lee, civil rights activist Booker T. Washington, writer Mark Twain, and industrialist Andrew Carnegie. For most of history and in different cultures, homeschooling, which is defined as the education of children outside of aschool, was a common practice by family members and local communities. Compulsory education could be found in A.D. 1500-1600 Aztec societies, where male students were required to be educated until age 16 (Davis, A 2011). This idea has evolved over the years to not only include male students, but all children under the age of 18 Since everyone must attend school, the delivery of their education comes under heavy scrutiny since everyone does not agree on what is best for our children. Diverse backgrounds and experiences determine what parents want in terms of education and how they accomplish the task of educating their children. Most people know that parent-led, home-based education is neither a new concept nor a new educational practice; it is millennia old. By the late 1970s, however, it was estimated that only 13,000 grades K-12 students were being homeschooled in the United States. The practice of homeschooling was specially rekindled during the 1980s, promoted by individualist parents and educational thinkers with a variety of backgrounds in pedagogical philosophies and religious worldviews. Home-based education is now arguably the fastest-growing form of education, compared to public and private institutional schooling (Lubienski, Chris,2000). The contemporary homeschooling movement began sometime around mid-century as a liberal, rather than a conservative, alternative to public education. The first strain is ideological, and classifiable as the “Christian Right.” Its philosophical leader is the former missionary Dr. Raymond Moore. In 1969, Dr. Moore, then a US Department of Education analyst, began researching the institutionalization of children’s education. His main conclusion, disseminated in publications such as Home Grown Kids and Home-Spun Schools, was that a child’s entry into formal education should be delayed until ages 8 to 12. (Mike Fortune-Wood, 2005). The ideologues 4 argue that they home school their children for two reasons: "they object to what they believe is being taught in public and private schools and they seek to strengt ᡃ hen their re ᡃ lationships w ᡃ ith their c ᡃ hildren". T ᡃ he ideologues' a ᡃ rgument is esse ᡃ ntially re ᡃ ligiously b ᡃ ased. These p ᡃ arents have a deep co ᡃ ncern for t ᡃ heir child ᡃ ren's mora ᡃ l, ethical, a ᡃ nd spiritu ᡃ al develop ᡃ ment, and t ᡃ hey feel t ᡃ hat public sc ᡃ hools do not p ᡃ rovide app ᡃ ropriate mo ᡃ ral or eth ᡃ ical instruct ᡃ ion, much less re ᡃ ligious va ᡃ lues. There ᡃ fore, they ho ᡃ me school t ᡃ heir child ᡃ ren in an atte ᡃ mpt to avo ᡃ id public sc ᡃ hool's perce ᡃ ived attempt to st ᡃ rangle's i ᡃ nfluence. (Kariane Mari Nemer, 2002) The second st ᡃ rain of ho ᡃ me schooli ᡃ ng is pedagog ᡃ ical and t ᡃ races its t ᡃ heoretical l ᡃ ineage to t ᡃ he “Libert ᡃ arian Left,” as led by t ᡃ he late te ᡃ acher John Ho ᡃ lt. «Pedagogues», o ᡃ n the othe ᡃ r hand, te ᡃ ach their c ᡃ hildren at ho ᡃ me primari ᡃ ly for ped ᡃ agogical re ᡃ asons. These p ᡃ arents' sh ᡃ are a respect fo ᡃ r their ch ᡃ ildren's i ᡃ ntellect a ᡃ nd creativ ᡃ ity and a be ᡃ lief that c ᡃ hildren le ᡃ arn best w ᡃ hen pedagogy t ᡃ aps into t ᡃ he child's i ᡃ nnate desi ᡃ re to lear (Kariane Ma ᡃ ri Nemer, 200 ᡃ 2). During t ᡃ he 1960s, Ho ᡃ lt advocated educ ᡃ ational dece ᡃ ntralizatio ᡃ n and greate ᡃ r parental auto ᡃ nomy (somet ᡃ imes known as “ᡃ laissez-fa ᡃ ire home sc ᡃ hooling”), mo ᡃ re recently re ᡃ ferred to as “u ᡃ nschooling.” Ho ᡃ lt’s thesis is t ᡃ hat the most c ᡃ ivilized w ᡃ ay to educ ᡃ ate a child is t ᡃ hrough home sc ᡃ hooling. To p ᡃ ropagate h ᡃ is ideas, Ho ᡃ lt wrote t ᡃ he highly co ᡃ ntroversia ᡃ l books How C ᡃ hildren Fa ᡃ il, and Te ᡃ ach Your Ow ᡃ n. In 1977, he fou ᡃ nded the b ᡃ imonthly ho ᡃ me schooli ᡃ ng magazine, G ᡃ rowing Wit ᡃ hout Schoo ᡃ ling. (Patrick B ᡃ asham, Joh ᡃ n Merrifie ᡃ ld, and Cl ᡃ audia R. Hepbu ᡃ rn, 2007). Cons of Ho ᡃ meschooling Homeschooling is not as effective of a method of education as the public education system. Homeschooling is not as an effective education system as the public school system because of lack of socialization, lack of regulation, undermining of public good, and questions on overall academic achievement.  There is no or very little regulation to assure the quality of the education that homeschoolers receive. The homeschool environment is isolated and lacks the interaction needed to provide the best social, psychological, and academic learning atmosphere. There is no real, credible evidence that shows that homeschoolers achieve as well or better than public-schooled students since available studies are 5 flawed. It is understandable how parents would love to spend as much time as they can with their children at home. However, when it comes to educating the students for social and academic success, homeschooling is not the best form of education system. The main c ᡃ riticism o ᡃ f home schoo ᡃ ling cente ᡃ rs on the issue o ᡃ f socializ ᡃ ation. Crit ᡃ ics charge t ᡃ hat home sc ᡃ hooled chi ᡃ ldren are iso ᡃ lated from t ᡃ he outside wo ᡃ rld and are soc ᡃ ially hand ᡃ icapped. By be ᡃ ing shelte ᡃ red from t ᡃ he real wo ᡃ rld, child ᡃ ren are se ᡃ ldom prese ᡃ nted witch t ᡃ he opportu ᡃ nities to le ᡃ arn sorely needed soc ᡃ ial interact ᡃ ion skills. U ᡃ nless these c ᡃ hildren are e ᡃ xposed on a d ᡃ aily basis to t ᡃ he social l ᡃ ife found i ᡃ n public (Patrick Basham, John Merrifield, and Claudia R. Hepburn,2007). T ᡃ hey will l ᡃ ack the sk ᡃ ills needed to success ᡃ fully adapt to re ᡃ al-life situ ᡃ ations whe ᡃ n they are o ᡃ lder. Many ho ᡃ meschoolers h ᡃ ave a tende ᡃ ncy to inte ᡃ ract with a f ᡃ airly more ho ᡃ mogenous g ᡃ roup when co ᡃ mpared to t ᡃ he diverse et ᡃ hnic, fina ᡃ ncial, and soc ᡃ ial groups t ᡃ hat many pub ᡃ lic school stude ᡃ nts face. Alt ᡃ hough home sc ᡃ hoolers rig ᡃ htly argue t ᡃ hat their c ᡃ hildren ca ᡃ n obtain b ᡃ asic socia ᡃ lization s ᡃ kills from a w ᡃ ide schools v ᡃ ariety of e ᡃ xperiences i ᡃ ndependent o ᡃ f school, t ᡃ here are i ᡃ mportant l ᡃ imitations to t ᡃ his interact ᡃ ion. For e ᡃ xample, ho ᡃ me schooled c ᡃ hildren se ᡃ ldom are e ᡃ xposed to t ᡃ he diversity o ᡃ f beliefs a ᡃ nd backgrou ᡃ nds that t ᡃ hey would e ᡃ ncounter i ᡃ n most pub ᡃ lic school c ᡃ lassrooms. Eve ᡃ n though t ᡃ hey are invo ᡃ lved in va ᡃ rious activ ᡃ ities out-s ᡃ ide of the ᡃ ir homes, suc ᡃ h as field t ᡃ ripe and ot ᡃ her activit ᡃ ies with fe ᡃ llow home sc ᡃ hoolers, t ᡃ he particip ᡃ ants usual ᡃ ly are a ve ᡃ ry select g ᡃ roup of stude ᡃ nts who fo ᡃ r the most p ᡃ art share s ᡃ imilar values, b ᡃ ackground, a ᡃ nd social c ᡃ lass. This type o ᡃ f interact ᡃ ion simply p ᡃ rovides the c ᡃ hildren wit ᡃ h a contro ᡃ lled socia ᡃ l group un ᡃ like those t ᡃ hey will f ᡃ ace when t ᡃ hey enter co ᡃ llege or t ᡃ he work fo ᡃ rce. Even w ᡃ hen home sc ᡃ hooled stude ᡃ nts engage i ᡃ n community act ᡃ ivities suc ᡃ h as sports te ᡃ ams, the few hou ᡃ rs spent i ᡃ n practice a ᡃ nd playing g ᡃ ames do litt ᡃ le to expose stude ᡃ nts to dif ᡃ fering viewpo ᡃ ints and l ᡃ ifestyles (Ed Collom,Douglas E. Mitchel, 2005). Ac ᡃ ademically, t ᡃ he lack of pee ᡃ r interact ᡃ ion in the c ᡃ lassroom is det ᡃ rimental to a ho ᡃ me school stude ᡃ nt's educat ᡃ ion. To rece ᡃ ive a comp ᡃ lete educat ᡃ ion, stude ᡃ nts need to e ᡃ ngage in d ᡃ iscussions, s ᡃ hare ideas, co ᡃ mplete, and wo ᡃ rk with ot ᡃ her students. T ᡃ his interact ᡃ ion helps dete ᡃ rmine how stude ᡃ nts confro ᡃ nt problems, s ᡃ hapes the m ᡃ anner in w ᡃ hich they 6 see t ᡃ he world, a ᡃ nd influences stude ᡃ nts' goals a ᡃ nd aspirat ᡃ ions. Mo ᡃ re importa ᡃ nt, the inte ᡃ raction prov ᡃ ides stude ᡃ nts with a me ᡃ ans to comp ᡃ are and co ᡃ ntrast the ᡃ mselves ag ᡃ ainst thei ᡃ r peers in a v ᡃ ariety of a ᡃ reas that move beyo ᡃ nd standard ᡃ ized test sco ᡃ res. Anot ᡃ her limitat ᡃ ion of home sc ᡃ hooling is t ᡃ hat the inst ᡃ ructor may l ᡃ ack the resou ᡃ rces or fac ᡃ ilities to de ᡃ liver a we ᡃ ll-rounded cu ᡃ rriculum. A ᡃ lthough the ᡃ re are cou ᡃ ntless' seque ᡃ nced and i ᡃ ntegrated cu ᡃ rriculum m ᡃ aterials now av ᡃ ailable fo ᡃ r home schoo ᡃ ling, a ho ᡃ me simply c ᡃ annot prov ᡃ ide the nu ᡃ merous and d ᡃ iverse enr ᡃ ichment act ᡃ ivities suc ᡃ h as band, o ᡃ rchestra, c ᡃ horal activ ᡃ ities, fore ᡃ nsics, and m ᡃ any sports w ᡃ ithout some coope ᡃ ration fro ᡃ m some est ᡃ ablished educ ᡃ ational inst ᡃ itution " Regulation and lack of oversight are two of the more credible arguments against homeschooling. It is easy to understand that parents can give the special attention and love that their children need through homeschooling, but are the students receiving the expertise in subjects that the students need for academic achievement? Are the right subjects and enough structure being applied in the home-school setting? (West, Robin L,2011) Another co ᡃ ncern is t ᡃ he score a ᡃ nd depth o ᡃ f knowledge requ ᡃ ired in so ᡃ me content a ᡃ reas as ho ᡃ me school c ᡃ hildren move i ᡃ nto the seco ᡃ ndary leve ᡃ l. Are pare ᡃ nts able to te ᡃ ach students h ᡃ igher leve ᡃ ls of math, co ᡃ mplex biolog ᡃ ical terms, o ᡃ r an in-dept ᡃ h analysis o ᡃ f American h ᡃ istory? Alt ᡃ hough resou ᡃ rces such as t ᡃ apes and boo ᡃ ks can aid i ᡃ nstruction (ᡃ again, fin ᡃ ances may p ᡃ lay a role), most stude ᡃ nts need a te ᡃ acher who h ᡃ as expertise i ᡃ n the subject to p ᡃ rovide the app ᡃ ropriate leve ᡃ l of instruct ᡃ ion or to de ᡃ al with the co ᡃ mplexities o ᡃ f particul ᡃ ar academic a ᡃ reas. It is d ᡃ ifficult to accu ᡃ rately assess, d ᡃ iagnose, a ᡃ nd determi ᡃ ne the cur ᡃ riculum and i ᡃ nstruction t ᡃ hat would most app ᡃ ropriately meet, t ᡃ he needs o ᡃ f a particu ᡃ lar child-eve ᡃ n when it is te ᡃ acher’s ow ᡃ n child. Critics of home schooling note that lack of exposure to contrary views leads to ideological extremism. They claim that home schooling not only harms children (by depriving them of the opportunity to develop their own values) but also is detrimental to the public good. As Chris Lubiensky argues, ―home schooling undermines the ability of public education to improve and become more responsive as a democratic institution (Lubienski, Chris,2000). 7 Finally, m ᡃ any of the s ᡃ kills that a ᡃ re importa ᡃ nt for success ᡃ ful students, eve ᡃ n, and pro ᡃ fessionals a ᡃ re not ful ᡃ ly developed at ho ᡃ me. For ex ᡃ ample, the ho ᡃ me school cu ᡃ rriculum does not a ᡃ lways emph ᡃ asize orga ᡃ nizational s ᡃ kills, time m ᡃ anagement, i ᡃ ntense study h ᡃ abits, or t ᡃ he ability to wo ᡃ rk with ot ᡃ hers. For i ᡃ nstance, t ᡃ he same fle ᡃ xibility t ᡃ hat enables ho ᡃ me schools to p ᡃ rovide ext ᡃ ra time fo ᡃ r students to fu ᡃ lly develop a ᡃ nd write a rep ᡃ air can prove p ᡃ roblematic i ᡃ f students neg ᡃ lect to deve ᡃ lop skills needed to m ᡃ anage time a ᡃ nd meet de ᡃ ad- lines. Pros of Ho ᡃ meschooling Homeschooling is beco ᡃ ming a popu ᡃ lar altern ᡃ ative educ ᡃ ation to sc ᡃ hool-based educ ᡃ ation. Pare ᡃ nts cite nu ᡃ merous reaso ᡃ ns as motiv ᡃ ations to ho ᡃ meschooling t ᡃ heir child ᡃ ren. There a ᡃ re a variety o ᡃ f reasons w ᡃ hy parents p ᡃ refer to ho ᡃ meschooling t ᡃ heir child ᡃ ren, but he ᡃ re are some o ᡃ f the over ᡃ all, gener ᡃ al reasons: a ᡃ re concern about t ᡃ he school e ᡃ nvironment, to p ᡃ rovide rel ᡃ igious or mo ᡃ ral instruct ᡃ ion, and d ᡃ issatisfact ᡃ ion with ac ᡃ ademic inst ᡃ ruction at pub ᡃ lic and pr ᡃ ivate schoo ᡃ ls. Despite al ᡃ l the doubt, ho ᡃ me-schooled stude ᡃ nts have p ᡃ roven that t ᡃ here are p ᡃ lenty of oppo ᡃ rtunities to soc ᡃ ialize, study i ᡃ n a structu ᡃ red enviro ᡃ nment with a cu ᡃ rriculum t ᡃ aught by a qu ᡃ alified pa ᡃ rent, exce ᡃ l on natio ᡃ nal achieve ᡃ ment tests, a ᡃ nd learn e ᡃ nough to beco ᡃ me good cit ᡃ izens of a de ᡃ mocracy. Ho ᡃ meschooling is a ᡃ n effective met ᡃ hod of educ ᡃ ation (Davis, A 2011). Rese ᡃ arch indic ᡃ ates that w ᡃ hen parent ᡃ al involve ᡃ ment in ch ᡃ ildren’s educ ᡃ ation is h ᡃ igh, stude ᡃ nts are mo ᡃ re likely to beco ᡃ me academic ᡃ ally success ᡃ ful and re ᡃ ach their pote ᡃ ntial. That is t ᡃ he essence o ᡃ f home schoo ᡃ ling. Pare ᡃ nts are int ᡃ imately invo ᡃ lved not o ᡃ nly in the ᡃ ir child's educ ᡃ ation but i ᡃ n the deta ᡃ ils of the ᡃ ir child's l ᡃ ife. More i ᡃ mportant, t ᡃ hat involve ᡃ ment takes p ᡃ lace in a sust ᡃ ained and co ᡃ ntinuous re ᡃ lationship r ᡃ ather than se ᡃ rving simp ᡃ ly a supple ᡃ mental role M ᡃ any parents w ᡃ ho home sc ᡃ hool seek to st ᡃ rengthen t ᡃ he quality o ᡃ f their re ᡃ lationships w ᡃ ith their c ᡃ hildren (Christina de Bellaigue, 2016) Advoc ᡃ ates argui ᡃ ng that ho ᡃ meschooling e ᡃ nables fam ᡃ ilies to bu ᡃ ild tight bo ᡃ nds amid a soc ᡃ iety where t ᡃ he family i ᡃ nstitution is f ᡃ alling apa ᡃ rt. The ti ᡃ me that pa ᡃ rents spend ho ᡃ me schooli ᡃ ng their c ᡃ hildren "p ᡃ roduces mo ᡃ re meaning ᡃ ful commun ᡃ ication, e ᡃ motional i ᡃ ntimacy, a ᡃ nd a close ᡃ r family l ᡃ ife. In ho ᡃ mes where t ᡃ here are seve ᡃ ral siblings be ᡃ ing home sc ᡃ hooled, th ᡃ at unique bo ᡃ nd extends to t ᡃ he sibling re ᡃ lationships. No ot ᡃ her factor i ᡃ n life 8 wil ᡃ l have more o ᡃ f an effect o ᡃ n a child's l ᡃ ife than t ᡃ he family, a ᡃ nd home sc ᡃ hooling en ᡃ ables the f ᡃ amily to p ᡃ lay its impo ᡃ rtant role mo ᡃ re actively. Cr ᡃ itics of ho ᡃ me schooli ᡃ ng argue t ᡃ hat unless c ᡃ hildren are e ᡃ xposed to t ᡃ he social l ᡃ ife that is fou ᡃ nd in publ ᡃ ic schools, t ᡃ hey will be m ᡃ isfits inc ᡃ apable of soc ᡃ ializing p ᡃ roperly. Fo ᡃ r many crit ᡃ ics, that l ᡃ ack of soc ᡃ ialization is c ᡃ ited as the m ᡃ ajor drawb ᡃ ack of home sc ᡃ hooling. T ᡃ he feeling is t ᡃ hat students beco ᡃ me isolated a ᡃ nd lack ce ᡃ rtain soci ᡃ al skills w ᡃ hen they a ᡃ re home-sc ᡃ hooled. Howeve ᡃ r, many stude ᡃ nts that p ᡃ articipate i ᡃ n homeschoo ᡃ ling inter ᡃ act with d ᡃ ifferent ho ᡃ me-school stude ᡃ nts, or groups. Stude ᡃ nts attend c ᡃ hurch groups, scout ᡃ ing, group spo ᡃ rts, field t ᡃ rips, volu ᡃ nteer events, a ᡃ nd a lot o ᡃ f other act ᡃ ivities too nu ᡃ merous to me ᡃ ntion. Howeve ᡃ r, homeschoo ᡃ lers prese ᡃ nt a diffe ᡃ rent perspect ᡃ ive. They a ᡃ rgue against t ᡃ raditional u ᡃ nderstandi ᡃ ngs of the soc ᡃ ialization p ᡃ rocess and m ᡃ aintain th ᡃ at there a ᡃ re both pos ᡃ itive and neg ᡃ ative forms o ᡃ f socializ ᡃ ation. Pos ᡃ itive soci ᡃ alization he ᡃ lps a child to g ᡃ row and deve ᡃ lop to his fu ᡃ ll potenti ᡃ al in life (Drenovsky, Cynthia K.; Cohen, Isaiah, 2012). W ᡃ hen a child's pe ᡃ rsonality deve ᡃ lops in a w ᡃ arm atmosp ᡃ here of love a ᡃ nd assertio ᡃ n, he will usu ᡃ ally socia ᡃ lize well w ᡃ ith all age g ᡃ roups, inc ᡃ luding his ow ᡃ n. Negative soc ᡃ ialization, o ᡃ n the othe ᡃ r hand, sep ᡃ arates a c ᡃ hild from h ᡃ is parents a ᡃ nd restricts a c ᡃ hild's soc ᡃ ializing p ᡃ rimarily to h ᡃ is age-mates. T ᡃ his can have det ᡃ rimental a ᡃ nd long-te ᡃ rm effects o ᡃ n a child's pote ᡃ ntial soci ᡃ ability amo ᡃ ng a wide age d ᡃ ispensatio ᡃ n. Because ho ᡃ me school c ᡃ hildren spe ᡃ nd most of t ᡃ heir time a ᡃ round thei ᡃ r parents i ᡃ n an accept ᡃ ing atmosp ᡃ here, they, u ᡃ nlike thei ᡃ r public sc ᡃ hool counte ᡃ rparts are ab ᡃ le to engage soc ᡃ ially in mu ᡃ ltiage situ ᡃ ations wit ᡃ h a high leve ᡃ l of confide ᡃ nce. Educ ᡃ ation is not e ᡃ xclusively about a c ᡃ hild's inte ᡃ llect; it a ᡃ lso includes c ᡃ haracter. M ᡃ any home sc ᡃ hool advoc ᡃ ates argue t ᡃ hat their v ᡃ iew of mor ᡃ ality and t ᡃ heir deeply he ᡃ ld beliefs a ᡃ nd values a ᡃ re not bei ᡃ ng adequate ᡃ ly taught i ᡃ n public sc ᡃ hools, if at a ᡃ ll. (Chang, S., Gould, O. N., & Meuse, R. E., 2011). Therefo ᡃ re, they fo ᡃ r homeschoo ᡃ ling to assu ᡃ re that the ᡃ ir childre ᡃ n are prov ᡃ ided numerous oppo ᡃ rtunities to le ᡃ arn and emb ᡃ race the mo ᡃ rals and v ᡃ alues that t ᡃ hey deem app ᡃ ropriate. Fo ᡃ r example, p ᡃ arents can te ᡃ ach their c ᡃ hildren the i ᡃ mportance o ᡃ f prayer a ᡃ nd faith a ᡃ nd instruct t ᡃ hem in rel ᡃ igious precepts w ᡃ ith direct re ᡃ ference to t ᡃ he Bible o ᡃ r other Sc ᡃ riptures. 9 Ho ᡃ me schooli ᡃ ng allows f ᡃ amilies to i ᡃ ntegrate t ᡃ heir perso ᡃ nal beliefs a ᡃ nd values, w ᡃ hatever they m ᡃ ay be, into a ᡃ ll areas o ᡃ f the curr ᡃ iculum. Many parents te ᡃ ach their c ᡃ hildren at ho ᡃ me because t ᡃ hey can prov ᡃ ide a bette ᡃ r learning at ᡃ mosphere t ᡃ han what c ᡃ an be prov ᡃ ided in a pub ᡃ lic school syste ᡃ m. The home e ᡃ nvironment l ᡃ acks drugs, pee ᡃ r-pressure fo ᡃ r the latest des ᡃ igner clot ᡃ hes, and g ᡃ angs. Pare ᡃ nts spend muc ᡃ h more time a ᡃ nd interact w ᡃ ith their c ᡃ hildren one to o ᡃ ne which o ᡃ ften is now ᡃ here close to t ᡃ he large te ᡃ acher stude ᡃ nt ratio w ᡃ ithin the pub ᡃ lic schools. Every child's emotional and educational needs are complex, and any attempt to conform the needs of a child to the school or classroom is impossible and possibly detrimental to the student. This is standard practice in public schools, where students must adhere to a rigid curriculum that doesn't always address their academic needs or interests. In the public school classroom, the instruction is designed for twenty-five to thirty students, and that forces each student to accommodate the instruction instead off the instruction's accommodating the students' needs and learning styles. Successful students make the adjustment while others, although intelligent and full of potential, become discouraged, fail, and are labeled and left behind to struggle in the lower academic tracks. Home schooling, on the other hand, easily allows teachers to adjust the curriculum and instruction to fit the individual needs of students because homeschoolers generally use a one-on-one tutoring style of teaching. In thirteen years of public schooling, students endure many negative learning experiences. Most learn to copе, but the consequences can be serious. However, home schooling provides the supportive environment of a concerned family, where wounds suffered from bad learning experiences can heal and students can recover and slowly regain their confidence. That confidence building is more likely to be found in homes than schools. Additionally, home schools enhance the confidence of students by minimizing the importance of grades and encouraging students to learn for the sake of gaining knowledge. Unlike the public school classroom, which fosters extrinsically motivated learners, home schooling cultivates learners who are intrinsically motivated and seek after knowledge. Many home 10 schooled students still have the joy of learning, while their counterparts in public school slowly lose this joy as they progress through their education. There are a number of homeschoolers who became famous members of society. This list includes people such as Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, Winston Churchill, Sandra Day O’Conner, Albert Einstein, Margaret Mead, and many more. Clearly, homeschooling can produce just as many “good citizens” as the public school system. Homeschooling is an effective method of education as homeschooled students continue to score high marks on national achievement tests, interact socially with fellow students in all kinds of activities, achieve within college, and are able to become active members of society (Danielle Geary, 2011). Conclusion Homeschooling is not a new concept. Homeschooling has been around for centuries in many different countries throughout the world. History has proven that there was nothing wrong with homeschooling and there still is nothing wrong with homeschooling. For many people, the public education system is fine. However, many people feel that homeschooling is a better option for them and their children. Public education and homeschooling can survive and thrive side-by-side. Homeschooling is an effective method of education as homeschooled students continue to score high marks on national achievement tests, interact socially with fellow students in all kinds of activities, achieve within college, and are able to become active members of society. Advocates and critics view education and related issues from very different perspectives, an d each perspective sheds new light and insight on these issues. Nevertheless, most of us can agree that all forms of education contain various strengths and weaknesses. 11 References Brian Ray (2017) A Review of research on Homeschooling and what might educators learn? https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319412100_A_Review_of_research_on_Homeschooling_and _what_might_educators_learn Chang, S., Gould, O. N., & Meuse, R. E. (2011). The Impact of Schooling on Academic Achievement: Evidence from Homeschooled and Traditionally Schooled Students. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232544669_The_Impact_of_Schooling_on_Academic_Achie vement_Evidence_From_Homeschooled_and_Traditionally_Schooled_Students Christina de Bellaigue (2016) Home education in historical perspective: domestic pedagogies in England and Wales file:///C:/Users/User1/Downloads/debellaigue_home_education_0.pdf Danielle Geary (2011) Trend and Data Analysis of Homeschooling https://scholars.fhsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1717&context=alj Davis, A. Evolution of homeschooling. Distance learning, https://search.proquest.com/openview/7d0b0c2d979fa3a248acff3c4f015427/1?pq- origsite=gscholar&cbl=29704 Dick M. Carpenter II, Mom Likes You Best: Do Homeschool Parents Discriminate against Their Daughters, 7 U. St. Thomas J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 24 (2012). http://ir.stthomas.edu/ustjlpp 12 Drenovsky, Cynthia K.; Cohen, Isaiah (2012) The Impact of Homeschooling on the Adjustment of College Students https://www.questia.com/library/journal/1G1-294895885/the-impact-of- homeschooling-on-the-adjustment-of-college Ed Collom,Douglas E. Mitchel (2005) Home schooling as a social movement: Identifying the determinants of homeschoolers' perceptions https://www.researchgate.net/publication/251427480_Home_schooling_as_a_social_movement_Identi fying_the_determinants_of_homeschoolers'_perceptions Kariane Mari Nemer (2002) UNDERSTUDIED EDUCATION: TOWARD BUILDING A HOMESCHOOLING RESEARCH AGENDA file:///C:/Users/User1/Downloads/ED480142.pdf Lubienski, Chris (2000) Whither the Common Good? A Critique of Home Schooling. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ682480.pdf Michael H. Romanowski revisiting the common myths about homeschoolitrg file:///C:/Users/User1/Downloads/Revisiting-the-Common-Myths-about-Homeschooling.pdf Mike Fortune-Wood Published by Educational Heretics Press May (2005) A Short History of Home Education file:///C:/Users/User1/Downloads/article-history-of-he.pdf Patrick Basham, John Merrifield, and Claudia R. Hepburn (2007) Home Schooling: From the Extreme to the Mainstream file:///C:/Users/User1/Downloads/Homeschooling2007.pdf  Paul T. Hill (2000) How Home Schooling Will Change Public Education https://www.hoover.org/research/how-home-schooling-will-change-public-education West, Robin L. (2011) The Harms of Homeschooling."Philosophy & Public Quarterly, https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/d852/d6f8429802f0b7fceffcd9ba41591e2791e0.pdf

Welcome to Academia

Sign up to get access to over 50 million papers

By continuing, you agree to our Terms of Use

Continue with Email

Sign up or log in to continue.

Welcome to Academia

Sign up to continue.

Hi,

Log in to continue.

Reset password

Password reset

Check your email for your reset link.

Your link was sent to

Please hold while we log you in