Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Seismotectonics of the Canary Islands

1992, Tectonophysics

Abstract

A revision of the seismicity, both historical and instrumental for the Canary Islands is presented. The occurrence on May 9, 1989 of an earthquake of magnitude 5.2 between the islands Gran Canaria and Tenerife, followed by a large number of aftershocks have been interpreted on seismotectonic grounds. The main conclusion is that a horizontal compressional stress regime in NW-SE direction is present in the region which is compatible with the tectonics in the northwestern part of the African continent.

KG-4.cI x lflgh

--_--... i": 23"i 13" 755":~ 6" A: 33"* 11" 7i"&. Ii" 1hV * 1J" -37 1) 7.x P:

4" * X" i4h" + 1.3" H: ?w+ If" wj-Y" wt II"

Nl?X 4.1 x lo'* 7': hO" YI" A: 143"' 67"

IIh" P: Iti" Table 2). The solutions are quite different, although they agree in the trend of plane B (about 290'1 and in the nearly horizontal position of the P axis. We are in favour of our solution since the first-motion inconsistencies are few and it fits the distribution of aftershocks and the regional seismicity trend. Plane A of our soIution has been selected as the fault plane on the basis of its agreement with the alignment of aftershocks (Fig. 2).

Seismotectonic interpretation

As mentioned before, the level of seismicity of the area before this earthquake was so low and diffused that it was not possible to relate it t.o fractures deduced from geophysical and geological studies. However, the occurrence of this shock and several microseismicity surveys carried out in Tenerife during 1980, 1981and 1982 makes it possible to interpret seismic activity on seismotectonic grounds. Main fractures in the islands and ocean ffoor detected by geophysical, petrographic and geochemical methods may be cfassified in two types or families: Atlantic and African, depending on their relationship with the opening of the Atlantic or the tectonics of the Atlas range in the African continent (Anguita andt-fern&t, 1975: Fuster, 1975;Carracedo, 1984;Emery and Uchupi, 1984;Daiiobeitia, 19881. For the African family of fractures the orientations are ENE-WSW (coincident with the Hierro-Gomera and Tenerife island axis) and NNE-SSW (coincident with the Fuerteventura-Lanzarote axis); and for the Atlantic (the one marked by the line La Palma-Gomera-Tenerife and Gran Canaria) WNW-ESE. This last alignment is called Atlantic, because it is oriented parallel to the transform faults of the mid-Atlantic ridge, in particular the Atlantic fracture zone (Rona, 19801. If such families of fractures are correlated with the seismicity presented in Figures I and 2, the most significant seismic trend present corresponds to the fracture of the African type detected by Bosshard and McFarlane (19701, located between Tenerife and Gran Canaria and considered responsible for the origin of the Canary Islands by Anguita and Hernan (19751. As described above, plane A of the focal mechanism of the main shock oriented NE-SW agrees with the distribution of aftershocks and marks the trend of the fat.& between Tenerife and Gran Canaria. According to this mechanism, we can conclude that the rn~~tion on this fault is left-lateral strike-slip with a reverse component of motion resulting in underthrusting of the west block (Tenerife). This type of motion present in the Fault of the African type between Tenerife and Cran Canaria corresponds to a pressure axis almost horizontal in NNW-SSE direction. This direction agrees with that found by Scheidegger (1978) for the predominant orientation of stresses derived from the observations of joints in Tenerife and Gomera. This coincidence may indicate a horizontaI pressure pattern in NNW-SSE direction which on reverse faufts produces vertical movements with underthrusting of the west block and strike-slip motion with southwest relative displacement of Tenerife with respect to Gran Canaria and Africa. A simplified tectonic picture of the region is shown in Figure 4. The border between the Eurasian and African plates is located to the north of the archipefago 03ufor-n et al., 1990). The trans-Agadir-Nekor fautt system to the northeast separates a block including the high Atlas and possibly an area of oceanic crust (Buforn et al., 19901. A horizontal compressional stress regime with NW-SE orientations is present in the whofe region. The Canary islands are located south of this btock, and it is likely that the fracture in NE-SW direction may be related to this important fault system (Sanz de Galdeano, 199OXThe orientation of the fault between Tenerife and Gran Canaria agrees also with other features in the archipelago such as the alignment of volcanoes in Tenerife and Lanzarote and is parailei to other faults, in the same direction, existing in the African continent such as the Zemmour fault (Anguita and Iiernin, 19751. The results presented above, in the absence of more focal mechanisms data and better definition of the seismic&y in the area, must be interpreted in a very provisional way. They point to the fact that main faults a presently active in the Canary archipelago are of the African type with orientation almost parallel to the Trans-Agadir and Zemmour faults, subject to NW-SE horizontal pressure, suggcstingtectonics in the isfands related to that of the African Continent.

Figure 4

RxaI parameters of the May 9, 1989 Catlarian earthquakeFig. 2. Epicenter and focal mechanism of the May 9, 1989 ea~bquakc and its afte~h~ks. Dots are com~~~ssio~s white triangles are difatations.