Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
1992, Tectonophysics
…
6 pages
1 file
A revision of the seismicity, both historical and instrumental for the Canary Islands is presented. The occurrence on May 9, 1989 of an earthquake of magnitude 5.2 between the islands Gran Canaria and Tenerife, followed by a large number of aftershocks have been interpreted on seismotectonic grounds. The main conclusion is that a horizontal compressional stress regime in NW-SE direction is present in the region which is compatible with the tectonics in the northwestern part of the African continent.
Marine Geophysical Researches, 2003
A series of clastic dikes and tubular vents were identified in southern Tenerife (Canary Islands). These features are the result of seismic liquefaction of a Holocene sand deposit, as the consequence of a high intensity paleoearthquake. The peak ground acceleration (pga) and magnitude of the paleoearthquake generating these liquefaction features were estimated by back calculation analysis. A representative value of 0.30 ± 0.05 g was obtained for the pga. From this, an earthquake intensity of IX was estimated for the liquefaction site. Magnitude bound methods and energy based approaches were used to determine the magnitude of the paleoearthquake, providing a moment magnitude M = 6.8. The zone in which the liquefaction structures are found has undergone tectonic uplift and is affected by two faults. One of these faults was responsible for displacing Holocene materials. Dating of the uplifted sand formation indicates an age of 10,081 ± 933 years, the liquefaction features ranging from this age to 3490 ± 473 years BP. This paleoearthquake was of much greater magnitude than those known historically. Faults with neotectonic activity are significant features that should be borne in mind when assessing the seismic hazards of the Canary Islands, presently considered as low and mainly of volcanic origin.
Tectonophysics, 2007
We have studied the focal mechanisms of the 1980, 1997 and 1998 earthquakes in the Azores region from body-wave inversion of digital GDSN (Global Digital Seismograph Network) and broadband data. For the 1980 and 1998 shocks, we have obtained strikeslip faulting, with the rupture process made up of two sub-events in both shocks, with total scalar seismic moments of 1.9 × 10 19 Nm (M w = 6.8) and 1.4 × 10 18 Nm (M w = 6.0), respectively. For the 1997 shock, we have obtained a normal faulting mechanism, with the rupture process made up of three sub-events, with a total scalar seismic moment of 7.7 × 10 17 Nm (M w = 5.9). A common characteristic of these three earthquakes was the shallow focal depth, less than 10 km, in agreement with the oceanic-type crust. From the directivity function of Rayleigh (LR) waves, we have identified the NW-SE plane as the rupture plane for the 1980 and 1998 earthquakes with the rupture propagating to the SE. Slow rupture velocity, about of 1.5 km/s, has been estimated from directivity function for the 1980 and 1998 earthquakes. From spectral analysis and body-wave inversion, fault dimensions, stress drop and average slip have been estimated. Focal mechanisms of the three earthquakes we have studied, together with focal mechanisms obtained by other authors, have been used in order to obtain a seismotectonic model for the Azores region. We have found different types of behaviour present along the region. It can be divided into two zones: Zone I, from 30°W to 27°W; Zone II, from 27°W to 23°W, with a change in the seismicity and stress direction from Zone I. In Zone I, the total seismic moment tensor obtained corresponded to left-lateral strike-slip faulting with horizontal pressure and tension axes in the E-W and N-S directions, respectively. In Zone II, the total seismic moment tensor corresponded to normal faulting, with a horizontal tension axis trending NE-SW, normal to the Terceira Ridge. The stress pattern for the whole region corresponds to horizontal extension with an average seismic slip rate of 4.4 mm/yr.
Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 1997
Seismic data have been used to determine the crustal and upper mantle structure of Tenerife, Canary Islands, a volcanic island of Tertiary age located on > 140 Ma oceanic crust. Reflection data show that oceanic basement dips gently towards the island, forming a flexural moat which is infilled by 2-3 km of well stratified material. The moat is characterised by a major angular unconformity, which we attribute to volcanic loading of pre-existing oceanic crust and overlying sediments and the subsequent infilling of the flexure by material that was derived, at least in part, from the islands. Refraction data show that the flexed oceanic crust has a mean thickness of 6.41 + 0.42 km and upper and lower crustal velocities of 4.8-5.4 km s-' and 6.7-7.3 km s-' respectively. The flexure, which has been verified by gravity modelling, can be explained by a model in which Tenerife and adjacent islands have loaded a lithosphere with a long-term (> IO6 yr) elastic thickness of approximately 20 km. Seismic and gravity data suggest that up to 1.5 X lo5 km3 of magmatic material has been added to the surface of the flexed oceanic crust which, assuming an age of 6-16 Ma for the shield building stage on Tenerife, implies a magma generation rate of about 0.006 to 0.02 km3 a-'. This rate is similar to estimates from other African oceanic islands (e.g., Reunion and Cape Verdes), but is significantly less than that which has been calculated at Hawaii. There is no evidence in either the seismic or gravity data that any significant amount of magmatic material has "underplated" the flexed oceanic crust. The crustal and upper mantle structure at Tenerife therefore differs from other oceanic islands such as Hawaii and Marquesas where > 4 km of underplated material have been reported.
Tectonophysics, 1976
New seismicity and focal-mechanism data from the area of the Azores Islands, in the Mid-Atlantic Ridge, to the Alboran Sea and the southern part of Spain are presented. As a consequence of the different characters in the focal-mechanism solutions and b-values associated, the area has been divided in four different parts, namely, Mid-Atlantic and Terceira Ridge, Azores-Gibraltar fault, Gulf of Cadiz, Alboran Sea and Betica. The last two form the interaction between the Eurasian and African continental plates. The fracture zone is the locus of very large earthquakes with mechanisms showing a predominant right-lateral horizontal motion. Seismic foci in the continental interaction zone are spread over the whole region with mechanisms changing in character from west to east. It is suggested that this may be consequence of the behaviour of the Spanish Peninsula as a partly independent subplate. In the eastern part of the studied zone, the so-called Alboran plate may be considered as a buffer plate.
KG-4.cI x lflgh
--_--... i": 23"i 13" 755":~ 6" A: 33"* 11" 7i"&. Ii" 1hV * 1J" -37 1) 7.x P:
4" * X" i4h" + 1.3" H: ?w+ If" wj-Y" wt II"
Nl?X 4.1 x lo'* 7': hO" YI" A: 143"' 67"
IIh" P: Iti" Table 2). The solutions are quite different, although they agree in the trend of plane B (about 290'1 and in the nearly horizontal position of the P axis. We are in favour of our solution since the first-motion inconsistencies are few and it fits the distribution of aftershocks and the regional seismicity trend. Plane A of our soIution has been selected as the fault plane on the basis of its agreement with the alignment of aftershocks (Fig. 2).
Seismotectonic interpretation
As mentioned before, the level of seismicity of the area before this earthquake was so low and diffused that it was not possible to relate it t.o fractures deduced from geophysical and geological studies. However, the occurrence of this shock and several microseismicity surveys carried out in Tenerife during 1980, 1981and 1982 makes it possible to interpret seismic activity on seismotectonic grounds. Main fractures in the islands and ocean ffoor detected by geophysical, petrographic and geochemical methods may be cfassified in two types or families: Atlantic and African, depending on their relationship with the opening of the Atlantic or the tectonics of the Atlas range in the African continent (Anguita andt-fern&t, 1975: Fuster, 1975;Carracedo, 1984;Emery and Uchupi, 1984;Daiiobeitia, 19881. For the African family of fractures the orientations are ENE-WSW (coincident with the Hierro-Gomera and Tenerife island axis) and NNE-SSW (coincident with the Fuerteventura-Lanzarote axis); and for the Atlantic (the one marked by the line La Palma-Gomera-Tenerife and Gran Canaria) WNW-ESE. This last alignment is called Atlantic, because it is oriented parallel to the transform faults of the mid-Atlantic ridge, in particular the Atlantic fracture zone (Rona, 19801. If such families of fractures are correlated with the seismicity presented in Figures I and 2, the most significant seismic trend present corresponds to the fracture of the African type detected by Bosshard and McFarlane (19701, located between Tenerife and Gran Canaria and considered responsible for the origin of the Canary Islands by Anguita and Hernan (19751. As described above, plane A of the focal mechanism of the main shock oriented NE-SW agrees with the distribution of aftershocks and marks the trend of the fat.& between Tenerife and Gran Canaria. According to this mechanism, we can conclude that the rn~~tion on this fault is left-lateral strike-slip with a reverse component of motion resulting in underthrusting of the west block (Tenerife). This type of motion present in the Fault of the African type between Tenerife and Cran Canaria corresponds to a pressure axis almost horizontal in NNW-SSE direction. This direction agrees with that found by Scheidegger (1978) for the predominant orientation of stresses derived from the observations of joints in Tenerife and Gomera. This coincidence may indicate a horizontaI pressure pattern in NNW-SSE direction which on reverse faufts produces vertical movements with underthrusting of the west block and strike-slip motion with southwest relative displacement of Tenerife with respect to Gran Canaria and Africa. A simplified tectonic picture of the region is shown in Figure 4. The border between the Eurasian and African plates is located to the north of the archipefago 03ufor-n et al., 1990). The trans-Agadir-Nekor fautt system to the northeast separates a block including the high Atlas and possibly an area of oceanic crust (Buforn et al., 19901. A horizontal compressional stress regime with NW-SE orientations is present in the whofe region. The Canary islands are located south of this btock, and it is likely that the fracture in NE-SW direction may be related to this important fault system (Sanz de Galdeano, 199OXThe orientation of the fault between Tenerife and Gran Canaria agrees also with other features in the archipelago such as the alignment of volcanoes in Tenerife and Lanzarote and is parailei to other faults, in the same direction, existing in the African continent such as the Zemmour fault (Anguita and Iiernin, 19751. The results presented above, in the absence of more focal mechanisms data and better definition of the seismic&y in the area, must be interpreted in a very provisional way. They point to the fact that main faults a presently active in the Canary archipelago are of the African type with orientation almost parallel to the Trans-Agadir and Zemmour faults, subject to NW-SE horizontal pressure, suggcstingtectonics in the isfands related to that of the African Continent.
Figure 4
RxaI parameters of the May 9, 1989 Catlarian earthquakeFig. 2. Epicenter and focal mechanism of the May 9, 1989 ea~bquakc and its afte~h~ks. Dots are com~~~ssio~s white triangles are difatations.