Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
…
7 pages
1 file
AI-generated Abstract
This paper explores the concept of language, including its structure, the diversity of human languages, and their evolution over time. It discusses the distinctions between natural languages and dialects, the role of classical languages in education, and examines the relationship between language and culture. Furthermore, it investigates historical perspectives on the origins of language, the evolution of languages, and highlights key figures in the field of linguistics.
This book is an introduction to the study of human language across the planet. It is concerned with the immense variety among the languages of the world, as well as the common traits that cut across the differences. The book presents a number of analytic tools for comparing and contrasting different languages, and for seeing any one particular language in a larger linguistic perspective. The book attempts to avoid eurocentrism, the excessive focus on European languages often found in introductions to linguistics. Although, for ease of presentation, examples are often drawn from English, a large variety of languages from all continents are drawn into the discussion whenever this helps to broaden our perspective. This global focus is reflected in the choice of topics. Apart from a chapter introducing the four traditional branches of linguistics (semantics, syntax, morphology and phonology), this book is primarily interested in the following seemingly simple questions: 1. How and why do languages resemble each other? 2. How and why do languages differ from each other? These questions are dealt with, from different angles, in the chapters on language universals, linguistic typology, language families and language contact. The chapter on language variation moves the focus from inter-language to intra-language comparison. Finally, the chapter on writing discusses similarities and differences in the ways in which various cultures have used a visual medium to represent and augment the auditory signals of speech. The book is primarily concerned with natural languages that function as full-fledged mother tongues for larger or smaller groups of people. It is less concerned with the clearly artificial and highly restricted languages of, for instance, mathematics, formal logic or computer programming. The line of division is not always clear. While the word one belongs to English, the number 1 belongs to mathematics; and while the words if and then belong to English, the logical operator if-then belongs to formal logic and computer programming. At the heart of our concern lies the spoken language. All natural languages are spoken, while to this day many of them have no written form. Unlike most textbooks in linguistics, however, this book will also devote a whole chapter to writing, which may be seen as an extension of speech. On the other hand, it will have little to say about forms of language that are based on gestures rather than speech, such as body language or the sign languages of the deaf.
Languages
Several studies in philosophy, linguistics and neuroscience have tried to define the nature and functions of language. Cybernetics and the mathematical theory of communication have clarified the role and functions of signals, symbols and codes involved in the transmission of information. Linguistics has defined the main characteristics of verbal communication by analyzing the main tasks and levels of language. Paleoanthropology has explored the relationship between cognitive development and the origin of language in Homo sapiens. According to Daniel Dor, language represents the most important technological invention of human beings. Seemingly, the main function of language consists of its ability to allow the sharing of the mind’s imaginative products. Following language’s invention, human beings have developed multiple languages and cultures, which, on the one hand, have favored socialization within communities and, on the other hand, have led to an increase in aggression between d...
Open Linguistics, 1: 71-95 (2014), 2014
The goal of the present contribution is to explore what kinds of objects languages are from a biolinguistic point of view. I define the biolinguistic point of view as a naturalistic study of languages and I show that from this point of view, languages are human language organs, that is, they are natural objects. However, languages change over time; therefore, they are also historically modified objects. Considering that natural organisms are historically modified natural objects, I look for inspiration in evolutionary theory to better specify what kinds of objects languages are and how they change and diversify. I conclude that every language is a 'unique evolutionary history' within a restricted space of design. This conclusion means that although the structure of languages reveals aspects of formal elegance and aspects of functional efficiency, there are no arguments to state that these aspects are manifested more or less intensely in some languages than in others. Then their formal and functional aspects are part of what is common to all languages, while variable parts of language are a reflection of the essentially historical nature of the lexical interface between the components of our language organs.
Exploring Language in Global Contexts , 2022
How often and how do we use language? Consider an example. Kelly wakes up in the morning and says good morning to her partner, listens to the radio news over breakfast, reads and responds to emails on the train on the way to work, gives a presentation at a meeting, watches YouTube videos in her lunch break, phones her mother after lunch, discusses a new project with colleagues and ends her day by watching television and discussing the day's events with her partner. Language is used in all these activities. In addition, language is used in thought and making sense of the phenomena we perceive every day. Humans have used language for at least 30,000 years (Genetti, 2014). It is an essential part of our lives and is intricately connected to everything we do, as Kelly's story shows. But what exactly is language? The definition of language is controversial, and many debates exist around it. For example, some approach it from the perspective of communication, others from the perspective of the structure of the brain and some others approach it as a structured system that involves sounds or signs that signify meaning. From the first perspective, David Crystal (n.d.), writing in the Encyclopedia Britannica, defines language as "a system of conventional spoken, manual (signed), or written symbols by means of which human beings, as members of a social group and participants in its culture, express themselves". Taking the second perspective, Noam Chomsky (2006) sees language as "the result of the unfolding of a genetically determined program". This view, known as "nativist", focuses on the cognitive aspects of language, shared by all humans. It asserts that there is a "universal grammar", an underlying linguistic structure that we all possess, even though each language develops in its own way. Taking the third perspective, Fromkin et al. (2018) hold that language consists of a set of sounds (or signs), and that to speak a language means knowing these sounds (or signs), how they combine to form words, what these words refer to and how these words combine to form sentences. As they put it, knowing a language "means knowing the sounds and meanings of many, if not all, of the words of the language, and rules for their combination-the grammar which generates infinitely many possible sentences" (p. 9). The chapters in this book take an eclectic approach that explores language from these various perspectives. Of course, humans are not the only living beings who communicate. What distinguishes human language from animal communication?
This is a translation (with Google Translator support), with some amendments, of the German version published on 05.03.2023 in Academia.edu. Language is an articulation gesture of the human speech apparatus that translates perceptions, with an externalization aim, from the mental to the physical domain. The two Germanic sound shift laws of Jacob Grimm have pointed the answer to the previously open question, what distinctive features are used by human language to encode the lexical content to be conveyed. Their core statement was that the lexical meaning of consonants used in Indo-European words, is invariant to changes in their phonation (airflow throttling and/or mixing with vocal cord sounds), for instance the mutations from T to D and Th. The Indo-Germanistic School is restricting since than the lexical equivalence to the various points of articulation (in the example to the plosive tip-of-the-tongue consonants). The thesis of this essay is that during the history of the global languages also the mutations to the other articulation points of the same articulation area (in the example from T, D, Th, S, L, Ralvear) have taken place, without loss of the lexical content. As there are only four articulation areas (those producing lip sounds, tongue-tip sounds, the back of the tongue sounds and pharyngeal sounds), there are only four lexically different sounds. As, furthermore, the language pioneers (the Homo sapiens) have made use of word roots of only three sounds, with a vowel as a central transition point, this has limited the availability of different word root formats to about 16. To encode the approximately 200 different lexical meaning fields of their mental lexicon, a dozens of multiple meaning field assignments to every format had to be disentangled with the aid of the context. This confirms the theory of the aleatorty codification of the word roots, a postulated by Platon and Ferdinand de Sassure. Human language can be seen as a metaphorical dance, whose double steps (mostly from a consonantal articulation area via the vocal area to another or the same consonantal articulation area) convey the lexical information. Mirror neurons support the interiorization of the lexical content by the listener or reproducer of the word roots. By applying the extended lexical equivalence criteria proposed here to the diachronic and global comparison of the various past languages it becomes evident, that their basic vocabulary has been largely uniform during the Mesolithic. The differentiaded during the Neolithic (after the “Babylonian language confusion”) has been partly due to preferences for alternative word formats already in regional use before. The previously much discussed divergences “kentum vs. satem”, “hepta vs. septem”, “hals vs. salis”, “P-Celtic” vs. “Q-Celtic” and “pater vs. paker” must therefore not be considered any more as sound shifts, but as coincidental preferences for alternative word root formats. The large regional diversification of the terminology for the aggregated vocabulary for the cultural achievements has blown up the perceived difference of the languages further more.
Linguistics , 2021
In their daily life, humans interact and communicate with the exterior environment, they express themselves and participate in their society using a structured system of communication called 'The language'. Language is important. it allows people to share ideas, thoughts, and feelings with each other. So the ability to talk to your friends, your partner, or your family, required having a shared language, which is necessary for these types of interactions. The language is based on so many methods: oral expression 'speech and gesture' (conventional spoken system), sign (the Manuel system) and the visual representation of verbal communication (the writing system); therefore; the human language is considered as a complex phenomenon because it doesn't use a single mode of transmission like the animal communication (sight and sound). Due to the vastness of the research context, The scientific study of language which is called linguistics (the Critical examinations of languages) appeared. since the ancient Greek civilization, so many debates had been placed about the origin of the language under the name of 'philosophy of language'. so many definitions of 'language' were delivered by so many authors and reference books. According to Aristotle, language is a speech sound produced by human beings to express their ideas, emotions, thoughts, desires, and feelings. in another definition, Sapir saw that language is a purely human and non-instinctive method of communicating ideas, emotions, and desires through a system of voluntarily produced sounds. followed by many scholars and linguists, other definitions appeared which added new bases and terms, and studied the subject of language from other perspectives.
Language Universals, 2009
In D. Kimbrough Oller and Ulrike Griebel (eds.) Evolution of Communication Systems: A Comparative Approach. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 217-235., 2004
Language Learning and Development, 2011
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae, and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material.
Trends in cognitive sciences, 2017
Arheologija i prirodne nauke, 2013
en.scientificcommons.org
Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 1971
International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, 2010
Economist & Jurist, 2024
Negotiation Journal, 2017
Perspectivas. Revista de Historia, Geografía, Arte y Cultura, 2017
Idesia (Arica), 2018
Journal of the Korean Society of Propulsion Engineers, 2016