This article examines the process by which early twentieth-century European modernists and African American artists of the Harlem Renaissance negotiated the influence of traditional African sculpture. With a focus on African American...
moreThis article examines the process by which early twentieth-century European modernists and African American artists of the Harlem Renaissance negotiated the influence of traditional African sculpture. With a focus on African American painter Aaron Douglas, the author investigates how and to what end his generation of African American artists incorporated these influences. The author additionally discusses how their methods, and the conditions surrounding them, compare to the aforementioned modernists. In examining the roots of these respective trajectories, the author discovered that various people and factorsincluding critics, cultural and political leaders, patrons, philanthropists, artistic/aesthetic movements, colonization, commercialization, racism, and social responsibility-impacted the abilities of modernists and African American artists to embrace or reject the influence of traditional African sculpture. The author urges art teachers and studio art professors to be mindful of the power structures that inhibit their abilities to look inclusively at the complexities of traditional African sculptural influences and their potential during student critiques. While completing my doctoral studies in art education, I enrolled on an independent study course under the tutelage of a visiting studio professor. I set up a studio in my basement and surrounded myself with an eclectic grouping of inspirational images and objects. When my professor arrived for our scheduled critique, I was eager to discuss a new series of small earthenware figurative vessels that integrated the design sensibilities and physiognomy of my surrounding collection of Dan and Goli masks (see Figure 1). After looking closely at the large nose and sensual lips of my forms, he hesitantly offered some surprising advice. He suggested: 'You might want to watch out for stereotypes.' Before I could respond, I noticed his eyes readjust as if he had suddenly come to a realization. He gasped, changed his authoritative tone, and humbly withdrew his initial response to admit: 'Maybe I should watch out for stereotypes.' He then regretfully admitted that the historical baggage of cultural domination inhibited his initial interpretation. Did the African influences I drew upon lose their ability to evoke meaning or did he enter into this critique with some preconceived notions about my influences, their origins, and my direction? Although my masks-their significance and function-preceded the stereotypes which subjugate them, in his view, my subsequent sculptures served only to reinscribe racial stereotypes. Thankfully, his forthrightness led us to a fruitful exchange regarding the impact of stereotypes, power, privilege, the credibility of influences, historiography, and the colonization of meaning. The following summer I visited another studio professor who had recently returned from his sabbatical in Italy where he studied ceramics. He was in the process of creating a new series of