Método Paidéia

Abordagem de conceitos e arranjos organizacionais para a Gestão e o Trabalho em Saúde no serviço de Urgência/Emergência do Hospital de Caridade São Vicente de Paulo no município de Jundiaí. A compreensão da natureza do trabalho, o Modelo de Gestão e Atenção e sua indissociabilidade, a garantia de novas relações na busca de consolidar a Política de Humanização, a organização do trabalho multiprofissional, os processos de Co-Gestão e as relações destes serviços na Rede de Atenção á Saúde são temas problematizados para a constituição de um Projeto Político para o Hospital. Fundamentos da Método Paidéia dão a consistência para a intervenção do nova direção do Hospital.

Resumen El fenómeno de la sofística en la Grecia clásica representa un momento fundamental de la vida intelectual de los griegos, especialmente porque es un efecto del surgimiento y desarrollo de la democracia en Atenas. El presente artículo pretende mostrar de manera amplia el movimiento sofístico de la Atenas del siglo V, y, es-pecialmente, sus repercusiones para la enseñanza de la virtud política, como parte del proyecto de la paideia sofística. Estos aspectos generales se ejemplificarán con más precisión exponiendo el pensamiento de uno de los sofistas más recono-cidos de su tiempo: Protágoras de Abdera. Abstract The phenomenon of sophistry in ancient Greece represents a fundamental moment in the intellectual life of the Greek, especially because it is an effect of the emergence and development of democracy in Athens. This article aims to show the sophistic movement of the Athens of the V century and especially its implications in teaching the political virtue, as part of the paideia of sophistry. These general aspects will be accurately exemplified by presenting the thought of one of the most known sophists of his time: Protagoras of Abdera. Forma de citar este artículo en APA: Cadavid Ramírez, L. M. (2014). Los Sofístas: maestros del areté en la paideia griega.

Examen del Método de Jaeger.  Análisis del programa metodológico esbozado en el Prólogo de 1944 a la edición castellana de la obra y  los seis pasos sinópticos de averiguación  resumidos por el autor veintisiete años después de la primera edición de Paideia en sus conferencias de Harvard de 1960 reproducidas luego en "Early Christianity and Greek Paideia" (Harvard University Press, 1961).

The article in question, holding up signs in the ideal of the self, whose borders the sociocultural context of the present converge, the concept of recovering Paideia, Greek legacy, discusses the pedagogical process that imbrincado in a network of relations involving the symbolic forms by which the man builds the world, estruturalizando the reality, according to the prospect of Cassirer (1874-1945), moves in the course of history, ranging from the trend that now gives priority to individual training, sometimes absolutiza the social aspect, the objects of research topics of discussion, “Who is, therefore, the individual?” (Topic I), and “What is therefore the company?” (Topic II). Far, however, to close the claim to be a definitive knowledge about the concept of individual and society, whose axes are the assumptions of the polarization that tends to involve the educational-training process, the discussion proposes a convergence of nuances and shades of thought emerged that bringing human silhouettes apparently antagonistic, more emphasis from a reading by unilateral (one of the shortcuts that onipotencializa of expression) than as the impossibility of accommodating a “intersectionality conciliativa”. Accordingly, if the individual under the referencialidade the text juxtaposed Durkheim (1858-1917) and Janet (1859-1947), permeated by the prospect of Morin (1921), the journey from field of society imposes a historical concept of knowledge, inter-linking it dialectically the production of human existence, which, after all , claiming the government of science, “autonomizada” since the Scientific Revolution (séc. XVII), engenders, on behalf of the instrumental reason, the archetypal values of modern society, which constitutes the contemporary Paideia are confronted, through moriniana approach, conclusive on aspects of the study, which denounce, in short, a demand that the self relationality can not escape a match him (man) with itself, its content, by referencializado communicative reason, transposing the polarity of the issue proposal, it becomes the only proposal to the height of the current socio economic situation.

The revolutionary concept of rhetoric introduced by Plato not only stood firmly against the oratorical practices of his times, but also established first “scientific” art of rhetoric applicable into the frames of philosophical paideia. His perception of rhetorical tasks was strictly related to the goals of political formation and was absolutely indispensable for the purposes of a pursuit of political wisdom, in its exceedingly distinctive meaning. Plato initiated a century-long dispute on rhetorical ends and its political - paideutic value. First, criticized by Isocrates, later, resumed in the most exceptional treatise of Aristotle, he delineated a path of a new display of educational value of the art of rhetoric.