Mother

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Maternal mental health is one of the factors affecting the development of the child, especially in the early years of life. Since lack of attention to development of infants and the following complications may lead to irreparable consequences, this study was performed to investigate the relationship between maternal mental health and the development of infants under one year of age.
METHODS: This cross-sectional study was performed on 200 mothers with infants aged 12 months who referred to Babol health centers in 2018. The required data were collected using demographic questionnaire, Goldberg General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28) (score 21 and below means health and 22 and above means disorder) and the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) (scores between 20-34 are minimum, 35-45 mild, 46-54 average and greater than or equal to 57 are defined as severe).
FINDINGS: The mean age of mothers in this study was 29.8±5.13 years. 29% of mothers had symptoms of mental disorder. The mean score of maternal general health was 19.20±11.89 and the mean score of the depression component was 2.45±3.62. In Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, there was a difference in infant weight index between growth percentiles of 15-50% and 50-85% at birth (p=0.015). However, no significant difference was observed with the growth process. Goldberg General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28) did not show a significant relationship with infants' weight, height and head circumference at the end of one year. All infants had a normal growth pattern in all three indices of weight, height and head circumference.
CONCLUSION: The results showed that there is a relationship between maternal mental health and infant birth weight. But in the growth process, there is no relationship between infants' growth indicators and mothers' mental health.

APA Newsletter on Feminism and Philosophy, Spring 2015 containing a reviews of Mothering Queerly, Queering Motherhood by Shelly Park (reviewed by Sarah LaChance Adams)
and a review of and Mad Mothers, Bad Mothers, and What a 'Good' Mother Would Do by Sarah LaChance Adams (reviewed by Dana Belu)

Limes, as the area of separation, but also as a meeting place of the Roman Empire and the peoples outside it, rightly takes a prominent place within the wider field of Frontier Studies. Danube border is of particular interest, because of the differences that existed among the border provinces on the one hand, and, on the other hand, because of the differences between peoples who, at the very place, encountered Romans and Roman traditions.
In the everyday life at the Limes, an important role was played by women: wives, legitimate or illegitimate, as well as numerous local women who were, instigated predominantly by motives of economy, attached to the camp life and participated in it in various ways.
The aim of this paper is to determine, based on the analysis of the representative Greek and Roman written testimonies, the manner in which these women are represented and described, as well as whether and to what extent this image corresponds to the role they, according to the modern scholarly findings, played in reality.
The chronological frame has been set up starting with the Augustinian rule, when the Eastern Danube region was organized as a province of Moesia, and ending with Maurician rule, when the Danube border finally crushed down under the attack of Avars.