Harvard Law Review: Volume 129, Number 1 - November 2015
()
About this ebook
The November issue is the special annual review of the U.S. Supreme Court's previous Term. Each year, the issue is introduced by noteworthy and extensive contributions from recognized scholars. In this issue, for the 2014 Term, articles include:
* Foreword: "Does the Constitution Mean What It Says?," by David A. Strauss
* Comment: "Imperfect Statutes, Imperfect Courts: Understanding Congress's Plan in the Era of Unorthodox Lawmaking," by Abbe R. Gluck
* Comment: "Zivotofsky II as Precedent in the Executive Branch," by Jack Goldsmith
* Comment: "A New Birth of Freedom?: Obergefell v. Hodges," by Kenji Yoshino
In addition, the first issue of each new volume provides an extensive summary of the important cases of the previous Supreme Court docket, covering a wide range of legal, political, and constitutional subjects. Student commentary on Leading Cases of the 2014 Term includes recent cases on: private rights of action and Medicaid; government speech under the First Amendment; judicial campaign speech; Fourth Amendment standing; reasonable mistakes of law for searches and seizure; regulatory takings under the Fifth Amendment; preliminary injunctions in death penalty cases; separation of powers in bankruptcy jurisdiction; legislative control of redistricting; racial gerrymandering under the Fourteenth Amendment; dormant commerce clause and personal income tax; changing interpretive rules in administrative law; residual clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act; cost-benefit analysis under the Clean Air Act; mens rea for violating federal threats law; disparate impact and racial equality in fair housing law; nondelegation doctrine in the context of railroad-passenger law; religious liberty and land use; Sherman Act state action immunity; and destruction of evidence under Sarbanes-Oxley.
Complete statistical graphs and tables of the Court's actions and results during the Term are included; these summaries and statistics, including voting patterns of individual justices, have been considered very useful to scholars of the Court in law and political science. The issue includes a linked Table of Cases and citations for the opinions. Finally, the issue features two summaries of Recent Publications.
The Harvard Law Review is offered in a quality digital edition, featuring active Contents, linked footnotes, active URLs, legible tables, and proper ebook and Bluebook formatting. This current issue of the Review is November 2015, the first issue of academic year 2015-2016 (Volume 129). The Review is a student-run organization whose primary purpose is to publish a journal of legal scholarship. It comes out monthly from November through June and has roughly 2500 pages per volume. Student editors make all editorial and organizational decisions.
Harvard Law Review
The Harvard Law Review is a student-run organization whose primary purpose is to publish a journal of legal scholarship. The Review comes out monthly from November through June and has roughly 2500 pages per volume. The organization is formally independent of Harvard Law School. Primary articles are written by leading legal scholars, with contributions in the form of case summaries and Notes by student members.
Read more from Harvard Law Review
Harvard Law Review: Volume 131, Number 7 - May 2018 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHarvard Law Review: Volume 127, Number 6 - April 2014 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Harvard Law Review: Volume 125, Number 5 - March 2012 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Harvard Law Review: Volume 130, Number 1 - November 2016 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHarvard Law Review: Volume 127, Number 1 - November 2013 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHarvard Law Review: Volume 131, Number 1 - November 2017 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHarvard Law Review: Volume 127, Number 8 - June 2014 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHarvard Law Review: Volume 127, Number 2 - December 2013 Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Harvard Law Review: Volume 129, Number 5 - March 2016 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHarvard Law Review: Volume 125, Number 1 - November 2011 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHarvard Law Review: Volume 130, Number 3 - January 2017 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHarvard Law Review: Volume 128, Number 2 - December 2014 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHarvard Law Review: Volume 124, Number 7 - May 2011 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHarvard Law Review: Volume 131, Number 2 - December 2017 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHarvard Law Review: Volume 128, Number 1 - November 2014 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHarvard Law Review: Volume 130, Number 9 - Bicentennial Issue 2017 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHarvard Law Review: Volume 130, Number 2 - December 2016 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHarvard Law Review: Volume 130, Number 4 - February 2017 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHarvard Law Review: Volume 128, Number 5 - March 2015 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHarvard Law Review: Volume 126, Number 2 - December 2012 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHarvard Law Review: Volume 130, Number 6 - April 2017 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHarvard Law Review: Volume 131, Number 4 - February 2018 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHarvard Law Review: Volume 125, Number 7 - May 2012 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHarvard Law Review: Volume 129, Number 6 - April 2016 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHarvard Law Review: Volume 125, Number 2 - December 2011 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHarvard Law Review: Volume 131, Number 8 - June 2018 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHarvard Law Review: Volume 125, Number 8 - June 2012 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHarvard Law Review: Volume 124, Number 8 - June 2011 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHarvard Law Review: Volume 129, Number 8 - June 2016 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to Harvard Law Review
Related ebooks
Harvard Law Review: Volume 129, Number 3 - January 2016 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHarvard Law Review: Volume 129, Number 8 - June 2016 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHarvard Law Review: Volume 129, Number 4 - February 2016 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHarvard Law Review: Volume 130, Number 8 - June 2017 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHarvard Law Review: Volume 125, Number 7 - May 2012 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHarvard Law Review: Volume 127, Number 8 - June 2014 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHarvard Law Review: Volume 130, Number 3 - January 2017 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHarvard Law Review: Volume 127, Number 5 - March 2014 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHarvard Law Review: Volume 127, Number 7 - May 2014 Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Harvard Law Review: Volume 130, Number 6 - April 2017 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHarvard Law Review: Volume 131, Number 4 - February 2018 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsYale Law Journal: Volume 122, Number 5 - March 2013 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHarvard Law Review: Volume 131, Number 1 - November 2017 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHarvard Law Review: Volume 126, Number 8 - June 2013 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHarvard Law Review: Volume 128, Number 7 - May 2015 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHarvard Law Review: Volume 130, Number 5 - March 2017 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsYale Law Journal: Volume 125, Number 6 - April 2016 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHarvard Law Review: Volume 124, Number 7 - May 2011 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHarvard Law Review: Volume 131, Number 8 - June 2018 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHarvard Law Review: Volume 126, Number 7 - May 2013 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHarvard Law Review: Volume 128, Number 6 - April 2015 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHarvard Law Review: Volume 126, Number 3 - January 2013 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsYale Law Journal: Volume 123, Number 3 - December 2013 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHarvard Law Review: Volume 128, Number 5 - March 2015 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsYale Law Journal: Volume 121, Number 5 - March 2012 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHarvard Law Review: Volume 129, Number 7 - May 2016 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHarvard Law Review: Volume 126, Number 5 - March 2013 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHarvard Law Review: Volume 130, Number 4 - February 2017 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsYale Law Journal: Volume 121, Number 1 - October 2011 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHarvard Law Review: Volume 128, Number 8 - June 2015 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Constitutional Law For You
Democracy and Political Ignorance: Why Smaller Government Is Smarter, Second Edition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Constitution for the Living: Imagining How Five Generations of Americans Would Rewrite the Nation's Fundamental Law Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPopular Government - Imperium Press (Studies in Reaction) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBlack Mondays: Worst Decisions of the Supreme Court (Fifth Edition) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHarvard Law Review: Volume 126, Number 2 - December 2012 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIndia, Bharat and Pakistan: The Constitutional Journey of a Sandwiched Civilisation Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Madam Chief Justice: Jean Hoefer Toal of South Carolina Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHow to Save a Constitutional Democracy Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Landmark Decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRot and Revival: The History of Constitutional Law in American Political Development Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsStates of Exception in American History Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsConstitutional Law Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Nine Black Robes: Inside the Supreme Court's Drive to the Right and Its Historic Consequences Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Yale Law Journal: Volume 122, Number 4 - January 2013 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Adversity of Diversity Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAmerican Secession: The Looming Threat of a National Breakup Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Reason in Law Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Constitutional Dictatorship - Crisis Government in the Modern Democracies Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Constitution of Kenya: Contemporary Readings Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Nature of Legal Interpretation: What Jurists Can Learn about Legal Interpretation from Linguistics and Philosophy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHarvard Law Review: Volume 127, Number 4 - February 2014 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsProfiles, Probabilities, and Stereotypes Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Principles of Masonic Law: A Treatise on the Constitutional Laws, Usages and Landmarks of Freemasonry Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsConstitutional Law: Essential Law Self Teaching Guide Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHell No: Your Right to Dissent in Twenty-First-Century America Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5University of Chicago Law Review: Volume 80, Number 2 - Spring 2013 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHezbollah - Cuckoo in the Nest Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Time to Speak: Selected Writings and Arguments Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Immigration Questions & Answers Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Reviews for Harvard Law Review
0 ratings0 reviews