Caesar's Gallic Wars: 58–50 BC
4/5
()
About this ebook
Kate Gilliver
Kate Gilliver is Professor of Ancient History at Cardiff University. A Roman military historian and archaeologist, she has particular interests in the conduct of war and the practicalities of waging war in the Roman world from the second Punic war to the third century AD. She has published on Roman military theory, temporary encampments and on display and uniformity in Roman military equipment.
Related to Caesar's Gallic Wars
Titles in the series (71)
War in Japan 1467–1615 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Second War of Italian Unification 1859–61 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Indian Mutiny 1857–58 Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Great Islamic Conquests AD 632–750 Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Crusades Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Rise of Imperial Rome AD 14–193 Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Northern Ireland Troubles: Operation Banner 1969–2007 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Soviet–Afghan War 1979–89 Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5The Wars of Spanish American Independence 1809–29 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe First World War (1): The Eastern Front 1914–1918 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Russia’s Wars in Chechnya 1994–2009 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Napoleonic Wars (3): The Peninsular War 1807–1814 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Second World War (1): The Pacific Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe American Civil War (3): The war in the East 1863–1865 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe American Civil War (1): The war in the East 1861–May 1863 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Rise of Imperial Rome AD 14–193 Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The American Civil War (2): The war in the West 1861–July 1863 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Napoleonic Wars (1): The rise of the Emperor 1805–1807 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Anglo-Afghan Wars 1839–1919 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The First World War (2): The Western Front 1914–1916 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Vietnam War 1956–1975 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Caesar's Gallic Wars: 58–50 BC Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The American Civil War (4): The war in the West 1863–1865 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCaesar's Civil War: 49–44 BC Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Wars of Alexander the Great: 336–323 BC Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Arab-Israeli Conflict: The Palestine War 1948 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Second World War (2): Europe 1939–1943 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Greek and Persian Wars 499–386 BC Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Napoleonic Wars (4): The fall of the French empire 1813–1815 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Crimean War: 1854–1856 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Related ebooks
The Army of the Roman Republic: From the Regal Period to the Army of Julius Caesar Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Conquest of Saxony AD 782–785: Charlemagne's defeat of Widukind of Westphalia Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Art of War in the Middle Ages Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRoman Legionaries: Soldiers of Empire Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Gallic War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Septimius Severus & the Roman Army Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Roman Conquests: Gaul Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Punic Wars 264–146 BC Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Julius Caesar: Rome's Greatest Warlord Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsImperial General: The Remarkable Career of Petellius Cerialis Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Battle of the Marne Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRoman Republic at War: A Compendium of Battles from 502 to 31 B.C. Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Rome and Carthage: The Punic Wars Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Third Macedonian War and Battle of Pydna: Perseus' Neglect of Combined-arms Tactics and the Real Reasons for the Roman Victory Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Battle of Salamis: The Naval Encounter That Saved Greece -- and Western Civilization Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Early Roman Warfare: From the Regal Period to the First Punic War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Viriathus: & the Lusitanian Resistance to Rome, 155–139 BC Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Art of War in Renaissance Italy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCaesar's Civil War: 49–44 BC Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Nisibis War: The Defence of the Roman East AD 337–363 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Battles and Battlefields of Ancient Greece: A Guide to Their History, Topography and Archaeology Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Light Dragoon Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEager for Glory: The Untold Story of Drusus the Elder, Conqueror of Germania Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Sir John Hawkwood: Chivalry and the Art of War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Napoleon's Army Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Ramillies 1706: Marlborough’s tactical masterpiece Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Asymmetrical Warfare On The Great Plains: A Review Of The American Indian Wars-1865-1891 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWar in Ancient Greece Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings1016 The Danish Conquest of England Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
European History For You
The World of Yesterday: Memoirs of a European Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsKrabat Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Ruin of Kasch Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Story of French Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5My Life in Politics Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Looking for The Stranger: Albert Camus and the Life of a Literary Classic Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Shortest History of Germany Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Parisians: An Adventure History of Paris Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The French Mind: 400 Years of Romance, Revolution and Renewal Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Lonely Planet Provence & Southeast France Road Trips Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Crusades Through Arab Eyes Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIn Search Of Berlin: The Story of A Reinvented City Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The War on the West: How to Prevail in the Age of Unreason Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Days in the Caucasus Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Brilliant Isles: Art That Made Us Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Discovery of France Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Amazing Writers: B1 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Putin’s People: How the KGB Took Back Russia and then Took on the West Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Consent: A Memoir Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Widow Clicquot: The Story of a Champagne Empire and the Woman Who Ruled It Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5A History of Food in 100 Recipes Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Happy Odyssey Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Nix Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The History of Denmark: A Fascinating Guide to this Nordic Country Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNotes from a Small Island Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5(Not Quite) Mastering the Art of French Living Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Lily's Promise: How I Survived Auschwitz and Found the Strength to Live Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Richest Man Who Ever Lived: The Life and Times of Jacob Fugger Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Sixty Million Frenchmen Can't be Wrong Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Related categories
Reviews for Caesar's Gallic Wars
6 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Caesar's Gallic Wars - Kate Gilliver
Background to war
Building an empire
Romans and Gauls had been clashing for centuries before the conquest of Gaul in the 1st century BC, but for long periods they had also experienced comparative peace as neighbours or near neighbours. Celtic or Gallic tribes (as the Greek writers called them) migrated into northern Italy during the late 5th and early 4th centuries BC, with some tribes settling, particularly around the fertile Po valley. The first major encounter between Rome and these Celtic tribes of what is known as the La Tène culture came in the early 4th century BC. They penetrated south into Etruria and Latium (Toscana and Lazio) where the invaders captured and sacked some of the largest cities, including the important Etruscan centre of Veii only a few miles north of Rome. In 390 BC Rome’s field forces were defeated, and the poorly defended city captured by the Gauls. Only the citadel held out: according to tradition, when the Gauls tried to scale it in a surprise night attack, the guard dogs failed to bark and it was only the honking of geese (kept on the Capitol because they were sacred to Jupiter) that awoke the guards. The guards then repelled the attack. The story may not be true, but after sacking Rome, or being paid off by the Romans, the Gauls withdrew. They were defeated shortly afterwards by Camillus, the great Roman general who is traditionally credited with making fundamental changes to the Roman army in order to deal with this new Gallic threat. The sacking of Rome was never forgotten, and Romans remained haunted by a kind of collective inbred fear of hordes of barbarians returning to destroy the city. The sack, along with the long subsequent history of violent encounters between the two cultures, formed part of the background to Caesar’s conquest of Gaul.
During the 150 years after the sack, Rome was gradually able to establish superiority over much of the Italian peninsula, ejecting several of the Gallic tribes from lands to the north of Rome. Between the First and Second Punic Wars (during the 3rd century BC) this conquest of Italy extended to the north as a coalition of Gallic tribes from northern Italy and across the Alps moved south, only to suffer a devastating defeat at Telamon in 225 BC which broke Gallic resistance in Italy. In the following five years much of the territory beyond the Po was incorporated as the province of Cisalpine Gaul, and Roman colonies were founded at Piacenza and Cremona. The final reduction of this new province had to wait until after the Second Punic War and the repulse of the Carthaginian raiding forces under Hannibal. After the first big Roman defeat at the hands of Hannibal at the Trebia in 218 BC, Gallic mercenaries flocked to join Hannibal and served with him through much of the Italian campaign. But after defeating Carthage, Rome turned back to north Italy and punished the tribes who had fought against them. The whole of Italy as far north as the Alps was incorporated as Roman territory and further colonies were created at Bologna and Parma. By the mid-2nd century BC Rome was ready to move into France, having secured her occupation of the whole of Cisalpine Gaul.
The excuse came in 154 BC when the Greek city of Marseilles requested help from Rome against raids from Liguria. The Roman response included the establishment of a small veteran settlement at Aix en Provence, which irritated the powerful Alloboges tribe nearby, on whose territory it was founded. They and their allies, including the Arverni, were defeated in a series of campaigns fought by Domitius Ahenobarbus and Fabius Maximus. Fabius inflicted an appalling defeat on the Gauls in 121 BC, claiming the quite extraordinary (and highly unlikely) casualty figures of 120,000 Gallic dead to only 15 Roman. The new province of Transalpine Gaul was created, which the Romans frequently referred to as simply ‘The Province’, from which modern Provence gets its name. As in Cisalpine Gaul, colonies were founded, at Nîmes and Toulouse, and a road was built, the Via Domitia, linking Italy with Spain. As well as leading to the creation of another province, the campaign to assist Marseilles also brought Rome into alliance with the Aedui, a Gallic tribe of modern Burgundy who were also allied to Marseilles. The existence of the new province and a formal alliance with the Aedui provided Rome with opportunities for further intervention in Gaul and the affairs of the Gallic tribes, but any further expansion was brought to a sudden stop by the arrival in southern Gaul of the Cimbri and Teutones. These migrating Germanic tribes offered serious resistance to Rome, defeating successive consular armies in the late 2nd century BC. They were eventually beaten by Marius (a great Roman general and consul), but as with the Gallic sack of 390 BC, the experience left scars on the Roman psyche. Future Roman attacks and campaigns against Germanic tribes could be passed off as retribution for the defeats and casualties of the 2nd-century incursions.
By the 1st century BC many of the tribes in Gaul were becoming urbanised, particularly those in the south where they came under the cultural influence of Marseilles and then, with the establishment of the province of Transalpine Gaul, Rome. Although Caesar uses the word oppidum to describe hill forts, he also uses it for defended settlements that were not on hills. Some of these could have been described as towns even by Romans who might have regarded Gaul and nearly everything about it and its inhabitants as barbaric. Avaricum (Bourges) had an open space which Caesar called a forum and may have had civic buildings; it had a huge defensive wall and its inhabitants regarded it as the most beautiful city in Gaul. Cenabum (Orleans) had a series of narrow streets which may well have had some kind of plan to them: Gallic towns were starting to adopt the grid plans of Mediterranean cities. Evidence of coin manufacture at important oppida suggests that they may have been tribal capitals, indicating some degree of political centralisation; Bibracte, for example, seems to have been the ‘capital’ of the Aedui, who were a fairly centralised tribe although plagued by factions. Other tribes that lacked this degree of centralisation might have been considered culturally backward by the Romans, but this added to their military reputation: Caesar considered the Belgae to be the bravest warriors of the Gauls because they were furthest removed from Roman influence. Their lack of centralisation also meant that they could be harder to conquer, as Caesar was to find when fighting tribes like the Veneti and Menapii who had no single centre of occupation and wealth.
One of the main reasons for the Greek and Roman influence on the Gallic tribes was trade. Marseilles was a significant centre of trade, and though Gallic tribes and Rome regularly fought each other, that did not prevent a huge amount of trade taking place between them well before the conquest under Caesar. Romans imported raw materials from Gaul, including iron, grain, hides and, particularly, slaves, the source of the latter being regular inter-tribal warfare that took place between both Gallic and Germanic tribes. In exchange, the Gauls (or at least the Gallic elite) received luxury goods and foods, and enormous amounts of wine. Wine had become a key symbol of wealth, status and ‘civilisation’, though the historian Diodorus Siculus says that the Gauls drank it neat, rather than diluted with water in the Roman style. Hence, although they were adopting the ‘civilised’ customs of the Mediterranean, Diodorus makes it clear that they were still barbarians because they did not know how to drink it properly. He goes on to say that wine had become such a valuable commodity that the exchange rate for an amphora of wine was one slave, although there were certainly plenty of slaves around. There must have been many Roman merchants already in Gaul before Caesar’s campaigns, including a community of citizens at Cenabum. Some of them were of high status and belonged to the Roman ‘equestrian’ order, the influential class immediately below senatorial rank, itself a prime source of new senators. They might expect to benefit from the opportunities conquest would bring, especially if they provided assistance in the form of intelligence and supplies for the Roman