Henk's Reviews > Almond

Almond by Sohn Won-Pyung
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
76202320
's review

it was ok
bookshelves: korean-literature

Quite melodramatic and with a lot of coincidences. However what especially did not sit well with me is how the neurodiverse main character is supposedly “cured” by friendship, romantic love and a Disney like act of self sacrifice.
… I still truly believe the heart can prevail over the brain

The first three (short, all of them are) chapters of Almond are wild, dark and sucked me in immediately. The narrator, a teenager who recounts growing up through bullying and trauma while dealing with the diagnosis of having small amygdala (the titular almond), reminds me of Oscar from Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close. Emotions are strange to him and his mother and grandma train the boy to interpret other people, while imprinting the mantra: Don’t stand out, that’s all you need to do.
An other proverb that comes back is: Too much honesty hurts others.

Won-pyung Sohn as said starts the book of with a proverbial bang, but the plot in the novel is in general much too convenient, with not only a very weird request of a totally unknown to the main person professor, but also his son turning up in the class of the main character. In general I found that part 1 (that is rather documentary but very effectively captures the cruelty of children) didn't flow in a naturally way into the later parts of the book. This while the book in my view takes a lot of too often used tropes in the later three sections, that loosely fit in the Band-of-outcasts-with-more-similarities-than-imagined-á-la-Breakfast-Club theme.

The whole rebellious kid (You’re stupid because you know too much) having a heart of gold when he is finally “seen” in by an outsider is for instance something that I have see much too often. He does have good quotes, like: If I can’t protect myself from being hurt I rather hurt other people. but he is really a bad boy as well, as animal abuse needs to drive home to the reader.
And there is an aloof a girl who is apparently practicing running in a library?
Overall the trope of someone different being a saint to help the rest see the value of normal life, is something I find a bit standard, and then there is the way how the whole book turns into a story of someone “recovering” from a neurological condition due to romantic love.
Quite Disney, and in some kind of way relaying for me that these things can go away as long as someone just tries enough.
All this combined made this for me a 2.5 star read, rounded down.
331 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Almond.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

September 16, 2020 – Shelved
September 16, 2020 – Shelved as: to-read
July 24, 2021 – Started Reading
July 24, 2021 – Finished Reading
July 30, 2021 – Shelved as: korean-literature

Comments Showing 1-26 of 26 (26 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by Amber (new)

Amber aaaaand that's that book removed from my tbr lol thank you


Henk Well you're welcome! It is very brief, but it disappointed me nonetheless.


message 3: by Amber (new)

Amber yea, the 'curing' a neurodiverse protagonist with love and friendship is not something I am interested in at all!


Veneta N Yeah the curing part was a bit much but I initially read it as he died and was talking from the other side, where he’s cured and his mom is awake and well. That’s the ending I chose 🙃


Henk Oh that is an interesting take, haven’t thought about it like that


Yanet It is not stated that he is cured, it is implied that he improved.


message 7: by Hey (new) - rated it 5 stars

Hey The end of this book quite generally did not state he was by any means "cured" he improved by which means, he understands better than he initially could at the start. Alexithymia is the inability to recognize or describe one's own emotions not that he couldn't feel or even have that. Although it has romantic love stemming, it wasn't the romantic loved that helped him improve to understand better it helped awaken a bit but wasn't the full reason, it was Gon. Also Gon was never shown to be a good boy or did we put aside his animal abuse, he was shown to be someone who was hurt and lashed out and deep down he can be good and he is, he just lashes out of anger and trauma due to what happend in his life and didn't have the emotional support he needed to help and change, and note he ignored the MC because he killed that animal wrongfully trying to help him( not that he was forced to, but because he wanted to hep him and thought it would work but didn't and the MC didn't feel a bit bad as he hoped and imagined he would react or feel either ) So in all, I think it is a lovely book and it all depends on interpretation and how well you can understand and empathize. Besides the whole book people around him told him how he should act , and why he should for the sake of others, but not why he should for himself or told him in a manner he would understand and use to his logic, and I think that's what Gon , Dora and his guardian tried with through love ( and remember love is not just an emotion it is also an action.)


Astrid he's not neurodivergent, he has an underdeveloped brain. Same thing happened with me, because the brain's plastic


message 9: by Tim (new) - rated it 3 stars

Tim Your review makes me feel like mine was unneeded as you get all my points across better than I did. Well done all around!


message 10: by Henk (new) - rated it 2 stars

Henk Thanks Tim!


message 11: by mia (new) - rated it 4 stars

mia i think the main point was that he wasn't a "saint"... he experienced none of the emotions that most humans do and was simply logical, which made it more impactful that he had such an influence on other people's lives.


Micaela Did you really read the book? Because in no way shape or form did it say he was cured, he showed slight improvement after experiencing yet another traumatic event. Romantic love also played no part in this, he wanted to save Gon, his best friend. And it’s not that friendship cured him, it’s that through his desire to help Gon, he realized he could understand human emotions better. His condition prevents him from understanding and expressing emotions, not from feeling them. So as he grew up and his brain naturally developed more, he realized in that last traumatic event that he understood things a little bit better. I have no idea where you got the fact that romantic love cured him from haha


message 13: by Jess (new) - rated it 5 stars

Jess Seems like you skipped a few words in this book


Chhhanj He wasn't cured by 'relationship' actually he wasn't even cured he was traumatized and that was the reason he acted that way after the stabbing


message 15: by Fiza (new) - rated it 5 stars

Fiza Nasir Bro? Did u even read?


message 16: by Henk (new) - rated it 2 stars

Henk Probably a hundred books a year more than you


Dorota Umiastowska Topic itself is good. Actually this alexithymia it is very rare and dangerous disorder. But the way Sohn Won-Pyung created this plot is very... easy, flat and superficial. I was disappointed too.


message 18: by Henk (new) - rated it 2 stars

Henk Thanks Dorota!


Bianca Fonseca I have a similar feeling in this! Like, I can not say that the book is objectively bad, besides the cliches and all. But as I started it the topics really touched me, but the second part was not it. Particularly as a neurodivergent person, even if not the same type as the protagonist. My hole life I have been forced to perform a character to fit in the society, not because I felt something was wrong, but because everyone around made sure to let me know. So in the end, he being somewhat “cured” was like (????)
And after reading the autor notes saying that part of her intent was debating if you could love your children no matter what, the answer conveyed by the book is “no, you can’t”. In the end the protagonist had to change and be “cured”, not a very good message for people in similar positions.


message 20: by Henk (new) - rated it 2 stars

Henk It is touching that you share this with me Bianca, thanks for your thoughts and reflections!


charlie seems like someone didnt read the book


message 22: by Henk (new) - rated it 2 stars

Henk Just like all the other 100+ books I read a year? 😂


Daniella Guerrero Glad I found this review to affirm my thoughts. I was wondering why no one else spotted the harmful messaging of how he was “cured” or “improved” after that traumatizing incident. Yeah, there was build up to it but the emphasis of “finally being human” at that moment didn’t sit right with me and it can be easily misunderstood (especially by younger folk as this is a YA novel)


message 24: by Henk (new) - rated it 2 stars

Henk Thanks Daniella!


TheNona I also felt this sense of lots of coincidences happening one after another.... and the way that the author describes "not knowing how to express a feeling I don't recognize " quite strange.... I am an autistic person and there are feelings that took me years to learn and, as the girl said above, the author describes this kind of learning as a "cure" you magically discover. And at the end it treats like he was now "socially active" and etc. It was very uncomfortable to read some parts ..


message 26: by Henk (new) - rated it 2 stars

Henk Thanks for your thoughts TheNona!


back to top