Battle of Clervaux

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search

Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

The Battle of Clervaux or the Battle for Clervaux[1] (in English sources, Clervaux is occasionally called by the German name Clerf)[2] was part of the Battle of the Bulge and took place in the town of Clervaux in northern Luxembourg.[3] It lasted from December 16 to 18, 1944.[3] German forces encircled numerically inferior American forces, primarily from the 110th Regiment and the 109th Field Artillery Battalion, and, after heavy fighting, forced them to surrender. The battle has been referred to as the Luxembourg "Alamo".[4][5][6]

Background

Striking at 5:30 a.m. on Saturday, 16 December, the Germans achieved almost total surprise in breaking through Allied lines, beginning what is commonly called the Battle of the Bulge. The German goal was to separate the American forces from the British and Canadian forces, and take the important port city of Antwerp. By late afternoon the Germans had 14 divisions operating in the Ardennes, but the number would swell to an estimated 25 divisions with 600 tanks and 1,000 aircraft.[7] The U.S. 106th Division, located in the most exposed positions along the corps line, and the 28th Division took the brunt of the attack. The 106th was later described as being "newly arrived and unpracticed", while the 28th had recently suffered heavy casualties in fighting to clear enemy forces from the Hürtgen Forest.[8] For their part, the German forces were hampered by a lack of adequate preparatory reconnaissance. There was also a mismatch between the quality of their armored and SS formations, which fought well, and that of their regular infantry units, which consisted largely of poorly trained and poorly motivated replacements.[8] Major General Troy H. Middleton, headquartered in Bastogne, was awakened by a guard and could hear the guns from there. Throughout the day, the 106th was able to hold its position, but additional German units poured in during the night. Much of the 106th was on the German side of the Our River in an area known as the Schnee Eifel. The division's commander, Major General Alan Jones, concerned about his two regiments east of the river, called Middleton. The conversation was interrupted by another call and then resumed. At the end of the conversation Middleton told an aide that he had given his approval to have the two regiments pull back to the west side of the river. Jones, on the other hand was convinced that Middleton had directed these units to stay and was further convinced of this by a written order from earlier in the day but just received.[9] As a result of the miscommunication, the pullback did not occur and the two regiments were ultimately surrounded with most of the men captured on 17 December.[10] While two of the 28th Division's regiments survived the German onslaught intact, and were able to inflict significant losses on German infantry formations,[8] the 110th Regiment, commanded by Colonel Hurley Fuller, was directly in the path of the massive advance.[11][12]

Battle

German forces of the Fifth Panzer Army under Hasso von Manteuffel's command, primarily from the 2nd Panzer Division, 116th Panzer Division and the 126th Infantry Division (another account suggests the 2nd Panzer, Panzer Lehr Division and the 26th Volksgrenadier Division)[2] attacked the American 110th Regiment from the 28th Division on December 16.[11][13] The 110th's regimental headquarters, and most of its strength, were in the town of Clervaux.[12][14] The unit also received support from a tank company from the 9th Armored Division[14] as well from the 103rd Engineer Battalion under Captain Parrett, and 109th Field Artillery Battalion under Lt. Col. Robert E. Ewing.[11] Despite this support, German forces had significant superiority in the region, and the engagement was described as a "couple of infantry companies and one company of light tanks versus substantial elements of an entire panzer corps."[14] Fuller described the opposing forces as "two Panzer divisions and one infantry division."[11]

At 09:30 on the 17th, the 2nd Panzer Division attacked Clervaux, with six German Stug IIIs and Panzergrenadiers in thirty armored vehicles advancing from the south. They were repulsed by five Shermans from the 707th Tank Battalion, which knocked out two Stug IIIs, while losing three Shermans themselves.[15] The burning vehicles blocked any further German progress along the narrow road. The Germans then detoured by attacking the railway station north of town. Their attack was a complete success as the Sherman tanks of the 2nd Tank Battalion were no match for the Panzer IVs of Panzer-Regiment 3.[16] The Americans lost fourteen Shermans.[17] The Panzergrenadiers and Panzer IVs raced to the center of the town from the north and most American soldiers in the town quickly surrendered.[18] Fuller requested permission to withdraw from Major General Norman Cota, the commander of the 28th Infantry Division, but he was denied it.[14] Some 100 American defenders still held Clervaux Castle.[16][2][13] Finally, on the morning of the 18th, the American troops under Captain Clark Mackey, commander of the 110th's Headquarters Company, and Captain John Aiken, out of ammunition and with the castle on fire, surrendered to the Germans as the German tanks broke into the castle compound.[13][14] Some troops made it out of Clervaux but many, like Colonel Fuller, were taken prisoner before they reached the Allied lines.[2][19]

Though the 110th Regiment and the 109th Field Artillery Battalion were shattered, the stubborn resistance offered by them and other VIII Corps units greatly slowed the German timetable.[11][19]

References

  1. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  3. 3.0 3.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  4. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  5. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  6. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  7. Eisenhower (1986), 557
  8. 8.0 8.1 8.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  9. MacDonald, 128–9.
  10. Price, 215–16
  11. 11.0 11.1 11.2 11.3 11.4 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  12. 12.0 12.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  13. 13.0 13.1 13.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  14. 14.0 14.1 14.2 14.3 14.4 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  15. Bergström 2014, pp. 96-97.
  16. 16.0 16.1 Bergström 2014, p. 97.
  17. Bergström 2014, p. 98.
  18. Bergström 2014, pp. 97-98.
  19. 19.0 19.1 Price, 221–2

Bibliography

  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

External links

  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found..
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found..