Buy term and invest the difference

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search

Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

Buy term and investing the difference is a concept involving term life insurance and investment strategies that allows individuals to eventually "self Insure" and provides an alternative to permanent life insurance. Generally speaking term insurance premiums are considerably less expensive in the short term than permanent life insurance for an individual for the same benefit amount. Permanent programs are more expensive because they force the policy owner to "Self Insure" by combining some form of cash accumulation with the insurance program as a single package. Consumers making use of the "buy term and invest the difference" concept separate their investments from their insurance by setting aside money every month equal to the premium that a permanent plan would require, then use a portion of this money for the term premium and place the rest in a tax-deferred investment vehicle.

Cases for and against implementing the strategy

The advantages of this strategy, if implemented correctly by the Theory of Decreasing Responsibility, are the ability to Self insure and get rid of the need for insurance, immediate accumulation of investment moneys, more investment options that may allow for similar tax advantages, and return of cash accumulation. Other advantages include elimination of loans and stability in the death benefit. In some cases, there are no investment options with similar tax advantages to permanent life insurance, such as when an investor in the United States makes too much income to qualify for a Roth IRA. Or a person's need to save annually in a tax deferred account exceeds the yearly contribution limits.

Self insuring

This strategy assumes consumers will self insure on their own and will eventually be able to eliminate the need for permanent insurance which forces them to self insure. Most responsibilities for which life insurance is purchased are temporary in nature (paying off mortgage and/or debts, provide education for dependents and create cash reserves to replace the income of the breadwinner). In the event of the insured's death, many or all of these responsibilities can be resolved using the proceeds from the policy or policies. When the consumer has cash reserves large enough, they consider themselves to be "self insured". Insurance terms may be a number of years in length (1, 5, 10, 20, 25, 30, 35 years or more) which, in theory, should provide enough time for the insured to invest and eliminate these responsibilities. In the event these responsibilities are not eliminated at the end of the term, many insurers will allow the insured to renew their current policy (guaranteed renewal) or purchase a new policy (conversion) without being subject to the same medical and financial qualifications as a new applicant. The premium rates for policies renewed or converted are not guaranteed however, and may be many times higher than the original premiums. The higher rates could be unaffordable or unreasonable.

Those who believe in buying term insurance and investing the difference in premium between a term and permanent policy must intend to self insure, since the term policy will eventually expire or become too expensive. If they are not disciplined enough to invest, pay off their debts, or assist their dependents in becoming independent, they still have a need for insurance.

Accumulation of investment money

With the concept of buying term instead of permanent insurance, more investment vehicles are available, all of which are independent of the insurance program and remain in control of the insured if the insurance portion is canceled. All cash accumulated is available based on the investment vehicle selected by the investor not the insurance company (granted the investment vehicle could be a sock drawer in which the cash is readily accessible but not growing).

Permanent or whole life insurance (life insurance that typically provides a death benefit for the lifetime of an insured person up to age 100) policies usually direct a portion of the premium payment to a sub-account within the policy, called cash value and the other portion to insurance. There are many different permanent life insurance products available with a range of options involving the cash value of the policy, including the ability to withdraw the cash value, borrow against it, and to allow it to be drawn on to pay the insurance portion without additional premium payments. Ultimately, all permanent life insurance policies are combination of term insurance with a savings vehicle. Insurers may break down a policy into 2 components, the term insurance portion (the net amount at risk) and the cash value (the guaranteed amount).

The cash value in the sub-account can accumulate over the life of the policy depending on the policy, however it is not always available for the first several years of the program. Universal and Variable or Variable Universal policies typically have immediate accumulation in the sub-account, but these funds may not available for loans and are typically subject to a surrender charges for the first several years of the program. In the case of plans paying a premium close to the minimum, the surrender charge is frequently in excess of the accumulation.

Again, this approach requires discipline. As with budgeting, many consumers who reduce expenditures fail to invest the money saved, and simply allow it to be reabsorbed to become part of their monthly spending. An example is someone who quits smoking thinking of all the money they'll save. Looking at things a few years later, it is a rare occurrence for anyone to actually have a large amount of money in their special "non-smoking" investment account.

Investment options

Buying term and investing the difference leaves the insured open to utilize whatever investment options they see fit. Permanent programs require the policy holder to use only the investment options available through the policy. Neither Term nor Permanent life insurance death benefits are generally subject to Federal income tax if the premiums are paid with after tax money. Death benefits are, however, potentially subject to Estate (Death) taxation, depending on how the ownership of the policy is structured and the size of the estate. Given current estate tax law, very few estates are large enough to cause estate tax to be due. Cash value growth in permanent plans is tax-deferred as long as the policy is in force. If the policy is canceled (because the need for insurance is eliminated) any accumulation in excess of the adjusted cost base (ACB) will be taxable. Permanent insurance policies typically allow access to the accumulated cash value through loans. If the policy is structured to reduce the death benefit as much as possible as the cash value is loaned out, the cost of insurance can be kept to a minimum while still qualifying a an insurance policy under tax law. In this way, the proceeds from the investment inside of the permanent insurance policy can potentially be withdrawn tax free. Premiums for insurance policies are most often paid with after tax money, though there are exceptions where the policy holder can use pretax money (as a business obligation in a corporation for example). Variable plans provide the insured the opportunity to choose the investments, though the investment vehicle is still within the life insurance plan.

To attain similar tax advantages, the insured may make investments through a tax deferred vehicle, such as an annuity, variable annuity, IRA, Roth IRA or even 529. Monies applied to a traditional IRA is pretax money while that applied to a Roth IRA are after tax. Both investment vehicles grow tax-deferred, similar to cash accumulation; however money withdrawn from a Roth are not taxed. 529s are educational accounts, and annuities are another form of life insurance account. (see http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p590.pdf http://www.irs.gov/retirement/article/0,,id=136868,00.html)

Each program has provisions for accessing monies invested early as does permanent insurance; however as a separate investment the term insurance death benefit is not impacted by accessing it.

Again this requires the implementer to research investments and how to best take advantage of them.

Other

Because of the increased premium at attained (then current) age, additional consideration should be given renewal or conversion of term insurance at the end of the original term. (In plain English review the renewal options to confirm renewal if required is not cost prohibitive). Also, purchasing annual renewable term insurance can add complexity to long-term investment strategies because premiums increase as the insured ages (so don't do this). To correctly implement this strategy term insurance with a Level premium should be used over an annual renewable source.

Comparison

In a hypothetical scenario with maximum premiums a permanent life insurance policy that allows loans to draw out the maximum cash value as the death benefit decreases, the internal rate of return for the premiums compared to total withdrawals can be higher than buying term and investing the difference in anything but a Roth IRA. However, funding a permanent insurance policy at the maximum level to avoid it turning into a modified endowment contract is rare. Funding the policy at less than the maximum rate causes the costs of insurance and fees to be a higher percentage of the premiums and results in the cash value accumulating to a lower total, lowering the internal rate of return. Using the buy term and invest the difference strategy where the entire investment is contributed to a Roth IRA, the internal rate of return is higher than any available permanent life insurance policy.

If the investor is unable or not disciplined enough to invest the difference, they may not be able to consistently make the larger permanent insurance policy payments either. If they don't their cost of insurance will be higher and they're investment return lower than if they had, and may be zero or negative. The argument for permanent insurance is that people will try harder to make their insurance payments than they will to invest regularly over the term of a term insurance policy.

External links