David, Prince of the Cumbrians

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search
Map of David's principality of "the Cumbrians".

Before David I of Scotland became King of Scotland in 1124, he was David, Prince of the Cumbrians and earl of a great territory in the middle of England acquired by marriage. This period marks the beginning of his life as a great territorial lord. Circa 1113, the year in which Henry I of England arranged his marriage to an English heiress and the year in which for the first time David can be found in possession of "Scottish" territory, marks the beginning of his rise to Scottish Noble leadership.

Introduction — David and Henry I

King Henry I of England. Henry's policy in northern Britain and the Irish Sea region essentially made David's political life.

No historian is likely to deny that David's early career was largely manufactured for him by King Henry I of England. David was one of Henry's "new men",[1] and his "greatest protégé";[2] Henry's influence had brought David his English marriage and lands, and Henry's military power had allowed David to take up his Scottish lands. David's early career can be understood as part of Henry's frontier policy, which included marriage of two daughters to the kings of Scotland and Galloway, consolidation of royal control in the north-west coast of England and the quelling of the Montgomeries, marcher lords on the Welsh borders who had been allied to Muirchertach Ua Briain, High King of Ireland (1101–19).[3] The world of peace which David had enjoyed in England ended after the death of Henry I, just as it did for most other English magnates.

When Henry I first became king of England, he did so in circumstances that were very irregular.[4] William II, it was said, had been killed in a hunting accident in the New Forest.[5] Henry tentatively assumed power while his elder brother Robert, duke of Normandy and the rightful heir, was on crusade. Thus, as a usurper within his own dynasty, he cast about for a claim to legitimacy. He found it in a marriage to David’s sister Edith, often called Matilda in Norman fashion, who had accompanied David in his exile.[6] She was a descendent of the near-extinct dynasty of Wessex through her mother, and thereby provided a crude but effective means to create a legal basis for his rule. As an added benefit, from Henry’s viewpoint, she might also provide some protection against further Scottish incursions like those that had plagued the northern English provinces with regularity under Malcolm III.[7] This is not to argue that Henry I and David could not have appreciated each other’s company and built their friendship on that basis, of course, but the fact that David was now styled as "the brother of the queen" when he witnessed documents does suggest at least one clear ulterior motive for their friendship and, on Henry’s part, points to a familiar and quintessentially feudal logic that underpinned his nurturing of David.[8]

Indeed, it was at Henry’s bidding that David gained experience as a judge in the royal courts; it was Henry who organized his aforementioned marriage to Maud de Senlis (Matilda)[9] in 1113, thereby installing David as one of the seven earls of the English realm; and it was Henry who ensured that the will of king Edgar was fulfilled, giving military aid to David when he was installed in his appanage.[10]

Furthermore, this organization of power based upon personal relationships peculiar to the feudal system ensured that, after he became king of Scotland in 1124, the only thing that kept David from pursuing a policy of vigorous expansion was his friendship with Henry.[11] To be sure, it should not be surprising to learn that David harboured territorial ambitions – such desires were cultivated by the prevailing culture of the Normans, the greatest warriors of the age, and applauded if they ended in conquest – nor should it be any surprise that he soon sought to express them upon Henry’s death.[12] That he should seek to place those ambitions upon a solid basis of propriety would have been even less remarkable, had a suitable excuse to attack not been conveniently at hand.

When Henry I died in 1135, David had already sat upon the throne of Scotland for nearly eleven years. He had also, in his capacity as a great English nobleman, been the first to swear obedience to Henry’s daughter, his own niece, the former Empress of Germany, Matilda, supporting her succession in lieu of any legitimate male heirs – Henry’s son having predeceased him, drowning in the famous disaster of the White Ship in 1120.[13]

The unclaimed inheritance

Steel engraving and enhancement of the reverse side of the Great Seal of David I, a picture in the Anglo-Continental style depicting David as a warrior leader. It is very similar to the seal of his brother, Alexander I of Scotland.

On January 8, 1107, David's brother Edgar died. It is often assumed that David took control of his inheritance, the southern lands bequeathed by Edgar, straight after the latter's death.[14] However, much of the evidence indicates that David had to wait until 1113 to get the support he needed to take control of these lands because of King Alexander's opposition; it cannot be demonstrated that he possessed his inheritance until his foundation of Selkirk Abbey late in the year 1113.[15] David's exact whereabouts between May 1108 and December 1113 are not explicitly attested in any sources, but according to the arguments of Richard Oram, all of this time was spent both in England and in Normandy. By the end of his time in the Kingdom of the English David had acquired lands in Yorkshire and in Normandy, receiving Hallamshire and the northern section of the Cotentin Peninsula from King Henry. David was probably in Henry's company when the latter campaigned in Normandy during this period, and David was probably given these lands as a reward for his services as a trusted subordinate. It was from Normandy and his possessions in the Cotentin Peninsula that David drew most of his early core followers, men such as Robert de Brus, Hugh de Morville and Ranulf de Soules, who became his chief magnates in the conquered territory between Cumberland and the Kingdom of Scotland; from here he probably brought his confessor John, the man who became the first bishop of David's reorganised diocese of Glasgow. According to Oram, it was only in 1113, when Henry had returned to England, that David was at last in a position to claim his inheritance in southern "Scotland".[16]

Seizure of inheritance

There is no evidence which shows that King Henry himself participated in the campaign in person, but it is clear that his backing was enough to force King Alexander to recognize his younger brother's claims. This probably occurred without bloodshed. Years later, when David invaded England with a huge army composed almost entirely of Gaelic Scots, Ailred of Rievaulx has a Norman knight named Robert de Brus lament and complain to David about his betrayal of the Angli and Normanni, the English and Normans, whom he once relied upon. Among other things, the knight asserted:

"Oh King, when thou didst demand from thy brother Alexander the part of the kingdom which the same brother [Edgar] had bequeathed at his death didst obtain without bloodshed all that thou wouldst, through fear of us"[17]

It was in this way, through a bloodless threat of force, that David gained his first territorial foothold within the area of modern Scotland. David's aggression seems to have inspired resentment amongst some native Scots. A recently rediscovered Gaelic quatrain from this period complains that:

Olc a ndearna mac Mael Colaim,   It's bad what Máel Coluim's son has done;,  
ar cosaid re hAlaxandir,   dividing us from Alexander;  
do-ní le gach mac rígh romhaind,   he causes, like each king's son before;  
foghail ar faras Albain.   the plunder of stable Alba.  [18]

If "divided from" is anything to go by, this quatrain may have been written in David's new territories in southern "Scotland".[19] The lands in question consisted of the pre-1994 counties of Roxburghshire, Selkirkshire, Berwickshire, Peeblesshire and Lanarkshire. David, moreover, gained the title princeps Cumbrensis, "Prince of the Cumbrians", as attested in David's charters from this era.[20] Although this was a large slice of Scotland south of the river Forth, the region of Galloway-proper was entirely outside David's control.[21] David may perhaps have had some varying degrees of overlordship in parts of Dumfriesshire, Ayrshire, Dunbartonshire and Renfrewshire; these lands were thought of as part of a [Greater] "Galloway", settled by Gall Gaidel, Gaelic-speakers of mixed Gaelic and Norse descent, and in the early days of David's lordship would have rendered no more than occasional payments of cain, the tribute paid to an overlord in Scotland.[22] Upon the lands between Galloway and the Principality of Cumbria, David eventually setup large-scale marcher lordships, such as Annandale for Robert de Brus, Cunningham for Hugh de Morville, and possibly Strathgryfe for Walter fitz Alan.[23]

Reformer

The modern ruins of Kelso Abbey. This establishment was originally at Selkirk from 1113, but was moved to Kelso in 1128 to better serve David's southern "capital" at Roxburgh.

In part, David made use of the "English" income secured for him by his marriage to Matilda de Senlis in order to finance the construction of the first true towns in Scotland, and these in turn allowed the establishment of several more.[24] As Prince of the Cumbrians, David founded the first two burghs of "Scotland", at Roxburgh and Berwick.[25] These were settlements with defined boundaries and guaranteed trading rights, locations where the king could collect and sell the products of his cain and conveth (a payment made in lieu of providing the king hospitality) rendered to him. These burghs were essentially Scotland's first towns.[26] David would found more of these burghs when he became King of Scots. In 1113, in perhaps David's first act as Prince of the Cumbrians, he founded Selkirk Abbey for the Tironensian Order. Several years later, perhaps in 1116, David visited Tiron itself, probably to acquire more monks; in 1128 he transferred Selkirk Abbey to Kelso, nearer Roxburgh, at this point his chief residence.[27]

Renewed bishopric of Glasgow

Almost as soon as he was in charge of the Cumbrian principality, David placed the bishopric of Glasgow under his chaplain, John, whom David may have met for the first time during his participation in Henry's conquest of Normandy after 1106.[28] John himself was closely associated with the Tironensian Order, and presumably committed to the new Gregorian ideas regarding episcopal organization. David carried out an inquest, afterwards assigned to the bishopric all the lands of his principality, except those in the east of his principality which were already governed by the Scotland-proper based bishop of St Andrews.[29] David was responsible for assigning to Glasgow enough lands directly to make the bishopric self-sufficient and for ensuring that in the longer term Glasgow would become the second most important bishopric in the Kingdom of Scotland. By the 1120s, work also began on building a proper cathedral for the diocese.[30] David would also try to ensure that his reinvigorated episcopal see would retain independence from other bishoprics, an aspiration which would generate a great deal of tension with the English church, where both the Archbishop of Canterbury and the Archbishop of York claimed overlordship.[31]

Activities in England

1113 was an important year in another respect. In the later part of the year, King Henry gave David the hand of Matilda de Senlis, daughter of Waltheof, earl of Northumberland. The marriage brought with it the "Honour of Huntingdon and Northampton", a lordship which was scattered in the shires of Northampton, Huntingdon and Bedford. Moreover, within a few years Matilda de Senlis bore to him a son, whom David named Henry after his patron, King Henry I.[32] Judith Green believes that Henry I's generosity had two causes; firstly, his wife — David's sister Matilda — was pressuring her husband to bestow favour on her younger brother; secondly, Henry wished to secure support for his succession plans.[33] David would naturally be expected to support Henry's heirs as they would be David's own kin, and so boosting David's power was very much in Henry's interest. The new territories David gained control of were very much a boost, a valuable supplement to his income and manpower, increasing his status as one of the most powerful magnates in the Kingdom of the English. Moreover, Matilda's father Waltheof had been Earl of Northumberland, a defunct lordship which had covered the far north of England and included Cumberland and Westmorland, Northumberland-proper, as well as overlordship of the bishopric of Durham. David would later revive the claim to this earldom for his son Henry, but that was in the future, only after the death of King Henry.[34]

Like his activities before 1113, David's activities and personal whereabouts after 1114 are not always easy to trace. He spent much of his time outside his principality. He was, for instance, at St Albans on December 28, 1115, and was still in England in 1116 when he witnessed a charter of his sister Queen Matilda (Edith, or Maud) at Westminster Abbey.[35] Despite the death of his sister on May 1, 1118, David remained a favoured vassal of King Henry. He was at Henry's court in the years 1121 and 1122. He was in the south of England in the summer of 1123, and it is possible that David accompanied Henry to Normandy in the same year to suppress William Clito's claim for the Duchy of Normandy. If David did go to France, then by the time he returned to Britain in 1124 his brother Alexander had died.[36]

Notes

  1. Kapelle, Norman Conquest, pp. 202-3.
  2. Oram, Lordship of Galloway, pp. 59, 63.
  3. Oram, Lordship of Galloway, p. 59 et passim.
  4. Oram, David I: The King Who Made Scotland, p. 50; Green, "David I and Henry I", passim; Kapelle, 34-49; Barrow, Feudal Britain, pp. 134-145.
  5. Green, "David I and Henry I", passim; Kapelle, Norman Conquest of the North, pp. 34-49; Barrow, Feudal Britain, pp. 134-145; Stringer, Earl David of Huntingdon, pp. 1-5; McDonald, "David I, c. 1085-1153", p. 335. Oram, David I: The King Who Made Scotland, p. 50. Many have theorized that Henry conspired against William, leading to his hunting ‘accident’. Oram names the murderer: Walter Tirel.
  6. Green, "David I and Henry I", passim; Oram, David I: The King Who Made Scotland, p. 49ff. esp. 52-53.
  7. Green, "David I and Henry I",’, passim; Stringer, Earl David of Huntingdon, pp. 1-5; MacDonald, "David I, c. 1085-1153", p. 335. Oram, David I: The King Who Made Scotland, pp. 52-53; Barrow, Kingship of the Scots, p. 38.
  8. Green, "David I and Henry I", passim; Oram, David I: The King Who Made Scotland, 49ff.
  9. Barrow, ‘Kingship and Unity’, pp. 35.
  10. A. D. M. Barrell, Medieval Scotland, 15-41; R. R. Davies, Domination and Conquest, pp. 11, 50-51: "Henry I’s extraordinary largesse was surely not disinterested. He had cocooned David in a web of munificence and obligation which should bring its reward amply if and when David succeeded to the throne (as he did in 1124)". Green, "David I and Henry I", passim; Bartlett, England, 79-80; MacDonald, "David I, c. 1085-1153", p. 335; Oram, David I: The King Who Made Scotland, p. 49ff.
  11. Green, ‘David I’, passim; Barrow, Feudal Britain, pp. 134-145; Stringer, Earl David of Huntingdon, pp. 1-5.
  12. R. R. Davies, The First English Empire, pp 4-30; Davies, Domination and Conquest, p. 26; Green, "Anglo-Scottish Relations", p. 68: "David...was in effect using those methods which Professor Le Patourel described as Norman imperialism against the Normans themselve".
  13. Alan O. Anderson, Early Sources, p. 170; Stringer, Reign of Stephen, pp. 28-37; K. J. Stringer, "State-Building in Twelfth-Century Britain", pp. 40-62; Green, "Anglo-Scottish Relations", pp. 65-68. Henry is a curious case. He produced a brood of bastards, and only one legitimate son.
  14. Judith Green, "David I and Henry I", p. 3. She cites the gap in knowledge about David's whereabouts as evidence; for a brief outline of David's itinerary, see Barrow, The Charters of David I, pp. 38-41
  15. See Oram, David: The King Who Made Scotland, pp. 60-2; Duncan, The Kingship of the Scots, pp. 60-4.
  16. For all this, see Oram, David: The King Who Made Scotland, pp. 59-63.
  17. A.O. Anderson, Scottish Annals, (1908), p. 193.
  18. Thomas Owen Clancy, The Triumph Tree, p.184; full treatment of this is given in Clancy, "A Gaelic Polemic Quatrain from the Reign of Alexander I, ca. 1113" in: Scottish Gaelic Studies vol.20 (2000), pp. 88-96.
  19. Clancy, "A Gaelic Polemic Quatrain", p. 88.
  20. For all this, see Oram, David: The King Who Made Scotland, pp. 62-64; for princeps Cumbrensis, see Archibald Lawrie, Early Scottish Charters Prior to A.D. 1153, (Glasgow, 1905), no. 46.
  21. Richard Oram, The Lordship of Galloway, (Edinburgh, 2000), pp. 54-61; see also following references.
  22. See, for instance, Dauvit Broun, "The Welsh Identity of the Kingdom of Strathclyde", in The Innes Review, Vol. 55, no. 2 (Autumn, 2004), pp. 138-40, n. 117; see also Forte, Oram, & Pedersen, The Viking Empires, (Cambridge, 2005), pp. 96-7.
  23. E.g., Oram, David: The King Who Made Scotland, p. 113, also n. 7.
  24. Oram, 192.
  25. Duncan, Scotland: The Making of the Kingdom, p. 465.
  26. See G.W.S. Barrow, Kingship and Unity: Scotland, 1000-1306, (Edinburgh. 1981), pp. 84-104; see also, Keith J. Stringer, "The Emergence of a Nation-State, 1100-1300", in Jenny Wormald (ed.), Scotland: A History, (Oxford, 2005), pp. 66-9.
  27. Oram, David I: The King Who Made Scotland, p. 62; Duncan, Scotland: The Making of a Kingdom, pp. 145.
  28. Oram, David: The King Who Made Scotland, p. 62.
  29. To a certain extent, the boundaries of David's Cumbrian Principality are conjecture on the basis of the boundaries of the diocese of Glasgow; Oram, David: The King Who Made Scotland, pp. 67-8.
  30. G. W. S. Barrow, "King David I and Glasgow", pp. 208-9.
  31. Duncan, Scotland: The Making of the Kingdom, pp. 257-9.
  32. G. W. S. Barrow, "David I (c.1085–1153)".
  33. Judith A. Green, "David I and Henry I", p. 6.
  34. For all this, see Duncan, Scotland: The Making of the Kingdom, pp. 134, 217-8, 223; see also, for Durham and part of the earldom of Northumberland in the eyes of Earl Henry, Paul Dalton, "Scottish Influence on Durham, 1066-1214", in David Rollason, Margaret Harvey & Michael Prestwich (eds.), Anglo-Norman Durham, 1093-1193, pp. 349-351; see also G. W. S. Barrow, "The Kings of Scotland and Durham", in Rollasonet et al. (eds.), Anglo-Norman Durham, p. 318.
  35. Oram, David: The King Who Made Scotland, p. 69.
  36. Oram, David: The King Who Made Scotland, pp. 69-72.

References

Primary sources

  • Anderson, Alan Orr (ed.), Early Sources of Scottish History: AD 500-1286, 2 Vols, (Edinburgh, 1922)
  • Anderson, Alan Orr (ed.), Scottish Annals from English Chroniclers: AD 500-1286, (London, 1908), republished, Marjorie Anderson (ed.) (Stamford, 1991)
  • Barrow, G. W. S. (ed.), The Charters of King David I: The Written acts of David I King of Scots, 1124-1153 and of His Son Henry Earl of Northumberland, 1139-1152, (Woodbridge, 1999)
  • Clancy, Thomas Owen (ed.), The Triumph Tree: Scotland's Earliest Poetry, 550-1350, (Edinburgh, 1998)
  • Donaldson, G. (ed.), Scottish Historical Documents, (Edinburgh, 1970)
  • Lawrie, Sir Archibald (ed.), Early Scottish Charters Prior to A.D. 1153, (Glasgow, 1905)
  • Skene, Felix J. H. (tr.) & Skene, William F. (ed.), John of Fordun's Chronicle of the Scottish Nation, (Edinburgh, 1872)

Secondary sources

  • Barrow, G. W. S., "Beginnings of Military Feudalism", in G. W. S. Barrow (ed.) The Kingdom of the Scots, (Edinburgh, 2003), pp. 250–78
  • Barrow, G. W. S., "King David I and Glasgow" in G.W.S. Barrow (ed.), The Kingdom of the Scots, (Edinburgh, 2003), pp. 203–13
  • Barrow, G. W. S., "David I (c.1085–1153)", in the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press, Sept 2004; online edn, Jan 2006 , accessed 11 Feb 2007
  • Barrow, G. W. S., "David I of Scotland: The Balance of New and Old", in G. W. S. Barrow (ed.), Scotland and Its Neighbours in the Middle Ages, (London, 1992), pp. 45–65, originally published as the 1984 Stenton Lecture, (Reading, 1985)
  • Barrow, G. W. S., Kingship and Unity: Scotland, 1000-1306, (Edinburgh. 1981)
  • Barrow, G. W. S., "The Kings of Scotland and Durham", in David Rollason, Margaret Harvey & Michael Prestwich (eds.), Anglo-Norman Durham, 1093-1193, pp. 309–23
  • Bartlett, Robert, England under the Norman and Angevin Kings, 1075-1225, (Oxford, 2000)
  • Bartlett, Robert, The Making of Europe, Conquest, Colonization and Cultural Change: 950-1350, (London, 1993)
  • Broun, Dauvit, "The Welsh Identity of the Kingdom of Strathclyde", in The Innes Review, Vol. 55, no. 2 (Autumn, 2004), pp. 111–80
  • Clancy, Thomas Owen, "A Gaelic Polemic Quatrain from the Reign of Alexander I, ca. 1113", in Scottish Gaelic Studies, vol.20 (2000), pp. 88–96.
  • Clancy, M. T., England and its Rulers, 2nd Ed., (Malden, MA, 1998)
  • Davies, R. R., Domination and Conquest: The Experience of Ireland, Scotland and Wales, 1100-1300, (Cambridge, 1990)
  • Davies. R. R., The First English Empire: Power and Identities in the British Isles, 1093-1343, (Oxford, 2000)
  • Dowden, John, The Bishops of Scotland, ed. J. Maitland Thomson, (Glasgow, 1912)
  • Duncan, A. A. M., "The Foundation of St Andrews Cathedral Priory, 1140", in The Scottish Historical Review, vol 84, (April, 2005), pp. 1–37
  • Duncan, A. A. M., The Kingship of the Scots 842-1292: Succession and Independence, (Edinburgh, 2002)
  • Duncan, A. A. M., Scotland: The Making of the Kingdom, (Edinburgh, 1975)
  • Forte, Angelo, Oram, Richard, & Pedersen, Frederick, The Viking Empires, (Cambridge, 2005) ISBN 0-521-82992-5
  • Green, Judith A., "Anglo-Scottish Relations, 1066-1174", in Michael Jones and Malcolm Vale (eds.), England and Her Neigh-bours: Essays in Honour of Pierre Chaplais (London, 1989)
  • Green, Judith A., "David I and Henry I", in the Scottish Historical Review. vol. 75 (1996), pp. 1–19
  • Haidu, Peter, The Subject Medieval/Modern: Text and Governance in the Middle Ages, (Stamford, 2004)
  • Hall, Derek, Burgess, Merchant and Priest: Burgh Life in the Medieval Scottish Town, (Edinburgh, 2002)
  • Moore, R. I., The First European Revolution, c.970–1215, (Cambridge, 2000)
  • Ó Cróinín, Dáibhí, Early Medieval Ireland: 400-1200, (Harlow, 1995)
  • O'Meara, John J., (ed.), Gerald of Wales: The History and Topography of Ireland, (London, 1951)
  • Oram, Richard, "David I" (2001), in M. Lynch (ed.) The Oxford Companion to Scottish History, (New York, 2001), pp. 381–382
  • Oram, Richard, David: The King Who Made Scotland, (Gloucestershire, 2004)
  • Oram, Richard, The Lordship of Galloway, (Edinburgh, 2000)
  • Shead, Norman F., "The Origins of the Medieval Diocese of Glasgow", in the Scottish Historical Review, 48 (1969), pp. 220–5
  • Skene, William F., Celtic Scotland: A History of Ancient Alban, 3 vols., (Edinburgh, 1876–80)
  • Stringer, Keith J., "Reform Monasticism and Celtic Scotland", in Edward J. Cowan & R. Andrew McDonald (eds.), Alba: Celtic Scotland in the Middle Ages, (East Lothian, 2000), .pp. 127–65
  • Stringer, Keith J., The Reformed Church in Medieval Galloway and Cumbria: Contrasts, Connections and Continuities (The Eleventh Whithorn Lecture, 14 September 2002), (Whithorn, 2003)
  • Stringer, Keith J., "State-Building in Twelfth-Century Britain: David I, King of Scots, and Northern England", in John C. Appleby and Paul Dalton (eds.), Government, Religion, and Society in Northern England, 1000-1700. (Stroud, 1997)
  • Stringer, Keith J., The Reign of Stephen: Kingship, Warfare and Government in Twelfth-Century England, (London, 1993)
  • Toorians, L., "Twelfth-century Flemish Settlement in Scotland", in Grant G. Simpson (ed.), Scotland and the Low Countries, 1124-1994, (East Linton, 1996), pp. 1–14
  • Veitch, Kenneth, "'Replanting Paradise':Alexander I and the Reform of Religious Life in Scotland", in the Innes Review, 52 (2001), pp. 136–166
  • Watt, John, Church in Medieval Ireland, (Dublin, 1972)