Opinion polling for the 2011 Canadian federal election

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search

Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found. This article provides a list of scientific, nationwide public opinion polls that were conducted leading up to the 2011 Canadian federal election.

Graphical summary

  • Graph of polling from the 2008 election to the 2011 election

  • ElectionPollingGraphCanada2011.png

    Graph of polling during the 2011 election showing trends by polling firm and party

  • Graph of polling during the 2011 election showing average trend line and margin of error

Campaign period

Polling Firm Date of Polling Link Conservative Liberal New Democratic Bloc Québécois Green Other Type Margin of Error
(19 times out of 20)
Election results May 2, 2011 HTML 39.6 18.9 30.6 6.0 3.9 0.9 — —
Forum Research May 1, 2011 HTML 36 19 33 5 6 Phone (IVR) ±1.6 pp
EKOS Research Associates[note 1] May 1, 2011 PDF 33.9 21.0 31.2 6.4 6.0 1.5 Phone (IVR) ±1.8 pp
Nanos Research[note 1] May 1, 2011 PDF 37.1 20.5 31.6 5.7 3.8 1.4 Phone ±3.0 pp
Harris-Decima May 1, 2011 PDF 36 19 30 6 6 Phone ±3.1 pp
EKOS Research Associates[note 1] April 30, 2011 PDF 34.6 20.4 31.4 5.4 6.3 1.8 Phone (IVR) ±1.8 pp
Forum Research April 30, 2011 HTML 2 35 19 33 5 7 Phone (IVR) ±1.6 pp
Nanos Research[note 1] April 30, 2011 PDF 37.0 22.7 30.6 5.5 3.2 Phone ±3.0 pp
Abacus Data April 29, 2011 PDF 37 18 32 7 7 Online ±3.2 pp
COMPAS April 29, 2011 PDF 46 17 26 7 4 Phone ±3.6 pp
Nanos Research[note 1] April 29, 2011 PDF 38.0 23.3 29.6 5.2 3.1 Phone ±3.0 pp
Angus Reid Public Opinion April 29, 2011 PDF 37 19 33 6 4 Online ±2.2 pp
Leger Marketing April 28, 2011 PDF 36 21 31 7 4 Online ±1.7 pp
Ipsos Reid April 28, 2011 HTML 38 18 33 6 4 Phone ±3.1 pp
EKOS Research Associates[note 1] April 28, 2011 PDF 34.5 20.0 29.7 6.3 6.9 2.7 Phone (IVR) ±1.8 pp
Nanos Research[note 1] April 28, 2011 PDF 36.4 22.0 31.2 5.7 4.0 Phone ±3.1 pp
Harris-Decima April 27, 2011 HTML 35 22 30 5 7 Phone ±3.1 pp
EKOS Research Associates[note 1] April 27, 2011 PDF 34.8 22.3 27.5 6.1 6.8 2.5 Phone (IVR) ±1.9 pp
Nanos Research[note 1] April 27, 2011 PDF 36.6 21.9 30.4 6.0 4.1 Phone ±3.1 pp
EKOS Research Associates[note 1] April 26, 2011 PDF 34.0 22.9 28.1 6.6 6.5 1.9 Phone (IVR) ±1.9 pp
Forum Research April 26, 2011 HTML 34 22 31 6 7 Phone (IVR) ±1.8 pp
Nanos Research[note 1] April 26, 2011 PDF 37.8 22.9 27.8 5.8 4.7 Phone ±3.1 pp
Angus Reid Public Opinion April 26, 2011 PDF 35 22 30 7 5 1 Online ±2.2 pp
EKOS Research Associates[note 1] April 25, 2011 PDF 33.9 24.0 27.9 6.0 6.8 1.4 Phone (IVR) ±2.0 pp
Innovative Research Group April 25, 2011 HTML 38.4 24.9 23.9 6.4 5.3 Phone ±2.49 pp
EKOS Research Associates April 24, 2011 PDF 33.7 23.7 28.0 6.2 7.2 1.2 Phone (IVR) ±1.9 pp
Nanos Research[note 1] April 24, 2011 PDF 39.2 25.6 23.6 6.5 3.6 Phone ±3.1 pp
Nanos Research[note 1] April 23, 2011 PDF 38.6 25.9 23.2 7.2 3.7 Phone ±3.1 pp
Environics April 21, 2011 HTML 39 22 25 7 6 1 Phone ±3.2 pp
Nanos Research[note 1] April 21, 2011 PDF 37.8 26.1 23.7 7.4 3.5 Phone ±3.1 pp
Ipsos Reid April 20, 2011 HTML 43 21 24 6 4 Phone ±3.1 pp
Forum Research April 20, 2011 HTML 36 23 25 6 6 Phone (IVR) ±2.2 pp
Nanos Research[note 1] April 20, 2011 PDF 39.0 26.7 22.1 7.5 3.4 Phone ±3.1 pp
EKOS Research Associates April 20, 2011 PDF 34.4 24.7 24.7 6.5 7.8 1.9 Phone (IVR) ±2.2 pp
Nanos Research[note 1] April 19, 2011 PDF 39.1 28.4 19.8 7.7 3.9 Phone ±3.1 pp
Nanos Research[note 1] April 18, 2011 PDF 39.8 30.2 17.3 8.6 3.1 Phone ±3.1 pp
Innovative Research Group April 17, 2011 PDF 39 28 17 9 6 1 Phone ±2.25 pp
Environics April 17, 2011 HTML 39 24 22 9 6 1 Phone ±3.2 pp
EKOS Research Associates April 17, 2011 PDF 37.4 24.9 20.0 7.8 8.4 1.5 Phone (IVR) ±2.2 pp
Harris-Decima April 17, 2011 PDF[dead link] 36 28 19 8 7 Phone ±3.1 pp
Nanos Research[note 1] April 17, 2011 PDF 39.8 29.8 17.4 8.6 3.4 Phone ±3.1 pp
Leger Marketing April 17, 2011 PDF 38 26 22 8 5 Online ±1.7 pp
Angus Reid Public Opinion April 16, 2011 PDF 36 25 25 9 5 Online ±2.2
Nanos Research[note 1] April 16, 2011 PDF 39.0 28.3 18.4 9.6 3.6 Phone ±3.1 pp
Abacus Data April 15, 2011 PDF 37 29 20 8 5 Online ±3.2 pp
Nanos Research[note 1] April 15, 2011 PDF 38.8 28.8 19.2 8.5 3.4 Phone ±3.1 pp
Forum Research April 14, 2011 HTML 36 25 22 7 8 Phone ±2.2 pp
EKOS Research Associates April 14, 2011 PDF 35.3 27.8 18.0 7.1 9.6 2.1 Phone (IVR) ±2.8 pp
Nanos Research[note 1] April 14, 2011 PDF 38.7 28.8 18.6 9.0 3.7 Phone ±3.1 pp
Nanos Research[note 1] April 13, 2011 PDF 38.9 31.1 18.3 7.5 3.1 Phone ±3.1 pp
EKOS Research Associates April 12, 2011 PDF 33.8 28.8 19.1 7.8 9.0 1.5 Phone (IVR) ±2.9 pp
Nanos Research[note 1] April 12, 2011 PDF 39.9 30.4 16.3 9.1 3.8 Phone ±3.1 pp
COMPAS April 11, 2011 PDF 45 24 16 8 7 Phone ±2.1 pp
Innovative Research Group April 11, 2011 HTML 39 28 17 9 7 Online ±2.16 pp
Nanos Research[note 1] April 11, 2011 PDF 39.7 31.2 16.8 7.8 4.0 Phone ±3.1 pp
Harris-Decima April 10, 2011 PDF 40 28 15 8 8 Phone ±3.1 pp
Nanos Research[note 1] April 10, 2011 PDF 41.2 30.4 15.2 7.8 4.6 Phone ±3.1 pp
Nanos Research[note 1] April 9, 2011 PDF 39.5 31.6 14.7 8.1 4.8 Phone ±3.1 pp
TNS Canada April 8, 2011 PDF 36 25 18 9 9 Phone ±3.1 pp
Nanos Research[note 1] April 8, 2011 PDF 40.5 31.7 13.2 9.2 4.0 Phone ±3.1 pp
Ipsos Reid April 7, 2011 HTML 41 26 19 9 4 Phone ±3.1 pp
EKOS Research Associates April 7, 2011 PDF 36.2 27.7 16.6 8.3 8.5 2.8 Phone (IVR) ±2.1 pp
Nanos Research[note 1] April 7, 2011 PDF 40.6 31.1 14.7 8.7 3.4 Phone ±3.1 pp
Forum Research April 6, 2011 HTML 38 26 20 8 9 Phone ±2.2 pp
Nanos Research[note 1] April 6, 2011 PDF 39.6 30.4 17.2 8.3 3.2 Phone ±3.1 pp
Environics April 5, 2011 PDF 38 25 20 8 8 Phone ±3.1 pp
Angus Reid Public Opinion April 5, 2011 PDF 38 27 21 8 6 Online ±2.2
EKOS Research Associates April 5, 2011 PDF 37.0 27.8 16.1 6.9 9.3 2.9 Phone (IVR) ±3.0 pp
Nanos Research[note 1] April 5, 2011 PDF 39.7 29.9 17.4 8.3 3.8 Phone ±3.1 pp
Nanos Research[note 1] April 4, 2011 PDF 39.8 30.2 16.5 8.3 4.0 Phone ±3.1 pp
Harris-Decima April 3, 2011 PDF 35 28 17 10 8 Phone ±3.1 pp
Nanos Research[note 1] April 3, 2011 PDF 42.3 28.4 16.4 8.0 3.8 Phone ±3.1 pp
Leger Marketing April 2, 2011 PDF 37 26 18 10 8 Online ±1.7 pp
Nanos Research[note 1] April 2, 2011 PDF 40.7 29.4 16.9 8.0 4.0 Phone ±3.1 pp
Nanos Research[note 1] April 1, 2011 PDF 41.3 30.3 16.0 8.5 3.7 Phone ±3.1 pp
EKOS Research Associates March 31, 2011 PDF 36.9 26.2 17.2 8.5 8.7 2.5 Phone (IVR) ±1.9 pp
Nanos Research[note 1] March 31, 2011 PDF 39.4 31.7 16.1 8.5 4.4 Phone ±3.2 pp
Nanos Research[note 1] March 30, 2011 PDF 39.1 32.7 15.9 8.7 3.7 Phone ±3.2 pp
Nanos Research[note 1] March 29, 2011 PDF 38.4 28.7 19.6 9.1 4.1 Phone ±3.2 pp
Abacus Data March 28, 2011 PDF 36 27 20 9 8 Online ±3.2 pp
Harris-Decima March 27, 2011 PDF 38 24 19 10 7 Phone ±3.1 pp
Forum Research March 27, 2011 HTML 41 24 19 10 6 Phone ±2.2 pp

Note 1: Based on a three-day rolling sample. To update the tracking, a new day of interviewing is added and the oldest day dropped.

Pre-campaign period

Polling Firm Date of Polling Link Conservative Liberal New Democratic Bloc Québécois Green Margin of Error
Angus Reid Public Opinion March 24, 2011 HTML 39 25 19 10 7 ±2 pp
Leger Marketing March 24, 2011 PDF 39 23 19 9 7 ±1.7 pp
EKOS Research Associates March 24, 2011 PDF 35.3 28.1 14.2 9.7 10.6 ±2.0 pp (c-95%)
Ipsos Reid March 23, 2011 HTML 43 24 16 10 6 ±3.1 pp (c-95%)
Harris-Decima March 20, 2011 PDF 34 28 17 10 9 ±2.2 pp (c-95%)
EKOS Research Associates March 16, 2011 PDF 34.1 25.7 16.4 10.2 10.4 ±2.8 pp
Nanos Research March 15, 2011 PDF 38.6 27.6 19.9 10.1 3.8 ±3.2 pp
Leger Marketing March 10, 2011 PDF 36 23 18 10 10 ±2.1 pp
Ipsos Reid March 9, 2011 HTML 40 27 16 11 5 ±3.1 pp (c-95%)
Angus Reid Public Opinion March 9, 2011 PDF 39 23 17 9 9 ±3.1 pp
EKOS Research Associates March 8, 2011 PDF 35.2 27.8 14.9 8.8 10.1 ±2.0 pp
Harris-Decima February 27, 2011 PDF 36 28 15 9 9 ±2.2 pp (c-95%)
Ipsos Reid February 27, 2011 HTML 43 27 13 10 5 ±3.1 pp (c-95%)
Abacus Data February 23, 2011 PDF 38 23 19 11 8 ±3.1 pp (c-95%)
EKOS Research Associates February 22, 2011 PDF 32.4 27.3 14.8 10.5 11.9 ±2.0 pp
Angus Reid Public Opinion February 18, 2011 PDF 39 26 18 9 6 ±1.2 pp
Nanos Research February 14, 2011 PDF 39.7 26.6 18.9 9.9 4.9 ±3.4 pp
Harris-Decima February 13, 2011 PDF 37 27 14 10 10 ±3.1 pp (c=95%)
Ipsos Reid February 10, 2011 HTML 39 25 18 9 10 ±3.1 pp
EKOS Research Associates February 9, 2011 PDF 37.3 24.8 14.2 9.9 10.7 ±2.4 pp
Ipsos Reid February 2, 2011 HTML 34 29 16 11 10 ±3.1 pp
EKOS Research Associates January 26, 2011 PDF 35.4 27.9 14.8 9.7 9.8 ±1.4 pp (c=95%)
Abacus Data January 24, 2011 PDF 35 27 18 10 9 ±3.0 pp (c=95%)
Pollara January 24, 2011 HTML 35 28 19 10 8 not stated
Harris-Decima January 16, 2011 PDF 36 28 15 9 9 ±2.2 pp (c=95%)
EKOS Research Associates January 12, 2011 PDF 34.5 27.3 14.8 9.8 10.3 ±1.7 pp (c=95%)
Angus Reid Public Opinion January 9, 2011 PDF 34 28 17 11 8 ±3.1 pp
EKOS Research Associates December 15, 2010 PDF 32.0 26.5 17.1 10.6 10.9 ±2.0 pp (c=95%)
Harris-Decima December 13, 2010 HTML 31 29 15 9 11 ±2.2 pp (c=95%)
Ipsos Reid December 9, 2010 HTML 39 29 12 10 9 ±3.1 pp
Angus Reid Public Opinion December 7, 2010 PDF 38 26 18 10 7 ±3.1 pp
EKOS Research Associates December 7, 2010 PDF 33.7 29.2 14.4 9.8 10.4 ±2.7 pp (c=95%)
Abacus Data December 6, 2010 PDF 35 24 20 10 10 ±3.1 pp (c=95%)
Nanos Research December 5, 2010 PDF 38.1 31.2 17.2 10.2 3.2 ±3.6 pp (c=95%)
EKOS Research Associates November 30, 2010 PDF 32.6 27.4 15.8 9.9 10.9 ±2.2 pp (c=95%)
EKOS Research Associates November 23, 2010 PDF 33.3 27.1 16.6 9.5 9.5 ±2.2 pp (c=95%)
EKOS Research Associates November 16, 2010 PDF 32.4 28.7 16.3 9.9 9.8 ±2.5 pp (c=95%)
EKOS Research Associates November 9, 2010 PDF 29.4 28.6 19.3 9.3 10.7 ±2.3 pp (c=95%)
Nanos Research November 5, 2010 PDF 37.1 31.6 15.4 10.8 5.2 ±3.4 pp (c=95%)
Ipsos Reid November 4, 2010 HTML 35 29 16 8 11 ±3.1 pp (c=95%)
Abacus Data November 1, 2010 PDF 33 25 21 10 10 ±3.1 pp (c=95%)
Harris-Decima October 31, 2010 PDF 33 28 17 9 10 ±2.2 pp (c=95%)
Angus Reid Public Opinion October 26, 2010 PDF 37 26 19 10 6 ±3.1 pp (c=95%)
EKOS Research Associates October 26, 2010 PDF 33.9 27.8 15.1 9.3 11.6 ±3.0 pp (c=95%)
EKOS Research Associates October 19, 2010 PDF 30.9 29.4 13.9 11.2 11.6 ±2.5 pp (c=95%)
Harris-Decima October 17, 2010 PDF 32 30 14 10 10 ±2.2 pp (c=95%)
EKOS Research Associates October 12, 2010 PDF 34.4 27.8 15.8 9.3 10.4 ±2.5 pp (c=95%)
Nanos Research October 6, 2010 PDF 36.6 32.4 16.3 9.8 4.9 ±3.4 pp (c=95%)
EKOS Research Associates October 5, 2010 PDF 31.8 27.6 16.5 9.7 11.2 ±2.0 pp (c=95%)
Angus Reid Public Opinion September 28, 2010 PDF 34 26 18 10 11 ±3.1 pp (c=95%)
EKOS Research Associates September 28, 2010 PDF 33.1 29.9 13.5 10.1 10.9 ±2.3 pp (c=95%)
Ipsos Reid September 23, 2010 HTML 35 29 12 11 12 ±3.1 pp (c=95%)
EKOS Research Associates September 21, 2010 PDF 31.7 29.3 14.6 9.7 11.8 ±2.5 pp (c=95%)
Harris-Decima September 19, 2010 PDF 33 30 14 10 11 ±2.2 pp (c=95%)
EKOS Research Associates September 14, 2010 PDF 32.4 28.9 16.6 8.9 10.7 ±2.3 pp (c=95%)
Ipsos Reid September 12, 2010 PDF 34 31 16 10 9 ±3.1 pp (c=95%)
Environics September 10, 2010 HTML 35 31 16 9 7 ±2.3 pp (c=95%)
EKOS Research Associates September 7, 2010 PDF 32.1 28.5 15.2 9.5 12.5 ±2.3 pp (c=95%)
Nanos Research September 3, 2010 PDF 33.3 32.8 15.6 12.1 6.2 ±3.4 pp (c=95%)
EKOS Research Associates August 31, 2010 PDF 29.4 29.1 15.7 10.9 13 ±2.7 pp (c=95%)
EKOS Research Associates August 24, 2010 PDF 31.1 27.6 16.9 11.2 10.7 ±2.5 pp (c=95%)
Harris-Decima August 22, 2010 PDF 33 30 16 9 10 ±2.2 pp (c=95%)
EKOS Research Associates August 17, 2010 PDF 32.5 27.9 17.4 9.2 10.3 ±1.8 pp (c=95%)
Angus Reid Public Opinion August 11, 2010 PDF 33 29 19 10 9 ±3.1 pp (c=95%)
EKOS Research Associates August 10, 2010 PDF 32.2 27.7 15.4 9.5 12.3 ±2.1 pp (c=95%)
Ipsos Reid August 9, 2010 HTML 34 31 15 9 9 payment required
Harris-Decima August 9, 2010 PDF 34 28 15 9 12 ±2.2 pp (c=95%)
Leger Marketing August 4, 2010 HTML 37 28 16 9 8 ±2.5 pp (c=95%)
EKOS Research Associates August 3, 2010 PDF 29.7 28.5 17.4 10.4 11.1 ±2.5 pp (c=95%)
EKOS Research Associates July 27, 2010 PDF 33.2 25.2 17.4 10.1 11.1 ±2.6 pp (c=95%)
Harris-Decima July 25, 2010 PDF 31 26 18 10 12 ±2.2 pp (c=95%)
EKOS Research Associates July 20, 2010 PDF 32.4 25.5 18.4 10.0 10.1 ±3.1 pp (c=95%)
EKOS Research Associates July 13, 2010 PDF 31.6 27.5 14.7 10.1 13.3 ±2.6 pp (c=95%)
Angus Reid Public Opinion July 8, 2010 PDF 36 27 20 10 7 ±2.2 pp (c=95%)
Ipsos Reid July 8, 2010 HTML 35 29 15 11 10 payment required
Environics July 8, 2010 PDF 35 32 15 9 6 ±2.2 pp (c=95%)
EKOS Research Associates July 6, 2010 PDF 32.1 25.8 17.5 9.7 12.2 ±1.7 pp (c=95%)
EKOS Research Associates June 21, 2010 PDF 31 27.7 16.5 9.3 13 ±2.4 pp (c=95%)
Harris-Decima June 20, 2010 PDF 34 27 17 11 10 ±2.2 pp (c=95%)
EKOS Research Associates June 15, 2010 PDF 30.5 26.3 17.4 10.5 12.3 ±2.4 pp (c=95%)
Ipsos Reid June 10, 2010 HTML 35 27 16 10 11 ±3.1 pp
EKOS Research Associates June 8, 2010 PDF 31.4 26.8 16.6 8.9 12.6 2.3
Nanos Research June 3, 2010 PDF 35.6 29.2 20.7 9.4 5.1 3.6
EKOS Research Associates June 1, 2010 PDF 31.7 26.2 17.4 10.3 11.5 2.0
Leger Marketing May 27, 2010 HTML 37 25 17 11 8 2.7
Angus Reid Public Opinion May 27, 2010 PDF 35 27 19 9 8 2.2
Environics May 26, 2010 PDF 36 30 15 10 7 2.2
EKOS Research Associates May 25, 2010 PDF 33.9 25.7 16.4 9.4 11.9 2.1
Harris-Decima May 23, 2010 PDF 36 27 16 8 11 2.2
EKOS Research Associates May 18, 2010 PDF 34.4 25.1 15.3 10.6 12 1.9
Harris-Decima May 16, 2010 PDF 32 28 17 10 11 2.2
EKOS Research Associates May 11, 2010 PDF 33.6 27.1 16.9 9.3 10.6 1.9
Ipsos Reid May 6, 2010 HTML 35 29 16 10 9 payment required
EKOS Research Associates May 4, 2010 PDF 33.1 26.1 16 10.2 11.5 2.1
Nanos Research May 3, 2010 PDF 37.2 33.2 16.2 9.6 3.8 3.1
Angus Reid Public Opinion April 29, 2010 PDF 35 28 19 11 7 3.1
Leger Marketing April 29, 2010 HTML 36 25 20 9 8 2.5
EKOS Research Associates April 27, 2010 PDF 31.9 26.6 17.6 9.7 10.9 2.2
Harris-Decima April 25, 2010 PDF 29 27 20 11 12 2.2
Ipsos Reid April 22, 2010 HTML 35 29 16 9 10 payment required
EKOS Research Associates April 20, 2010 PDF 31.7 27.1 16.3 9.5 12.6 2.3
EKOS Research Associates April 13, 2010 PDF 31.4 29 16.4 8.8 11.1 2.7
Ipsos Reid April 8, 2010 HTML 37 27 15 10 10 3.1
EKOS Research Associates April 6, 2010 PDF 33.6 27.3 15.9 9.6 11.7
Harris-Decima April 5, 2010 PDF 32 29 17 9 11
EKOS Research Associates March 30, 2010 PDF 32.2 27 16 9 12.7
Angus Reid Public Opinion March 26, 2010 PDF 35 29 20 9 7
EKOS Research Associates March 23, 2010 PDF 33.3 27.7 15.9 9.8 10.4
Ipsos Reid March 18, 2010 HTML 34 28 18 9 10
EKOS Research Associates March 16, 2010 PDF 33.1 28.9 15.7 9.2 10.8
Nanos Research March 11, 2010 PDF 34.7 34.6 17.8 7.7 5.2
EKOS Research Associates March 9, 2010 PDF 31.9 29.6 16 9.1 11
Harris-Decima March 7, 2010 PDF 33 29 16 10 11
EKOS Research Associates March 2, 2010 PDF 32.4 29.4 15.2 9.4 10.5
Harris-Decima February 28, 2010 HTML 31 31 16 8 12
Angus Reid Public Opinion February 26, 2010 PDF 33 29 20 9 9
Environics February 24, 2010 HTML 31 30 16 9 13
EKOS Research Associates February 23, 2010 PDF 33.4 30.3 15.8 8.2 10.4
Ipsos Reid February 22, 2010 HTML 37 29 16 9 7
EKOS Research Associates February 16, 2010 PDF 31.2 29.0 16.5 8.8 11.8
Harris-Decima February 14, 2010 PDF 32 30 16 10 10
Angus Reid Public Opinion February 13, 2010 PDF 34 30 18 9 8
Environics February 9, 2010 HTML 33 37 13 8 9
EKOS Research Associates February 9, 2010 PDF 31.0 29.0 15.5 10.3 11.3
Nanos Research February 4, 2010 PDF 35.6 33.9 16.4 8.5 5.6
EKOS Research Associates February 2, 2010 PDF 31.0 31.9 15.4 8.4 10.9
Harris-Decima January 31, 2010 PDF 32 32 15 10 9
Angus Reid Public Opinion January 26, 2010 PDF 33 29 19 10 7
EKOS Research Associates January 26, 2010 PDF 31.1 31.6 14.6 9.1 11
Harris-Decima January 24, 2010 HTML 32 31 15 10 10
Ipsos Reid January 21, 2010 HTML 34 31 17 9 8
EKOS Research Associates January 19, 2010 PDF 31.5 30.9 14.9 9.1 11.5
Angus Reid Public Opinion January 13, 2010 PDF 34 28 19 9 8
EKOS Research Associates January 12, 2010 PDF 30.9 29.3 15.3 10.2 11.9
Harris-Decima January 10, 2010 PDF 34 30 16 9 9
Strategic Counsel January 8, 2010 HTML 31 30 18 9 10
Angus Reid Public Opinion January 6, 2010 HTML 36 29 17 10 8
EKOS Research Associates January 5, 2010 PDF 33.1 27.8 16.0 9.8 13.4
EKOS Research Associates December 15, 2009 PDF 35.9 26.7 17.0 9.2 11.2
Nanos Research December 13, 2009 PDF 39.5 30.2 18.7 7.7 4
Angus Reid Public Opinion December 10, 2009 PDF 36 29 16 11 6
EKOS Research Associates December 8, 2009 PDF 35.6 26.5 16.7 9.9 11.3
EKOS Research Associates November 24, 2009 PDF 36.9 27.1 15.3 9.4 11.4
Ipsos Reid November 19, 2009 HTML 37 24 19 9 10
Angus Reid Public Opinion November 16, 2009 PDF 38 23 17 11 10
Nanos Research November 10, 2009 PDF 38 28.8 17.9 9.3 5.9
EKOS Research Associates November 10, 2009 PDF 36.6 26.6 16.8 8.8 11.2
EKOS Research Associates November 3, 2009 HTML 37.4 26.8 16.3 9.4 10.0
EKOS Research Associates October 27, 2009 HTML 38.4 26.8 16.7 8.2 9.9
Angus Reid Strategies October 24, 2009 PDF 40 26 17 9 7
Ipsos Reid October 22, 2009 HTML 40 25 13 11 11
Environics October 21, 2009 HTML 38 26 16 8 10
EKOS Research Associates October 20, 2009 HTML 38.3 27.1 14.5 9.0 11.0
Nanos Research October 18, 2009 PDF 39.8 30 16.6 8.9 4.6
Angus Reid Strategies October 14, 2009 PDF 41 27 16 8 6
EKOS Research Associates October 13, 2009 HTML 40.7 25.5 14.3 9.1 10.5
Harris-Decima October 12, 2009 HTML 35 28 15 10 10
Ipsos Reid October 8, 2009 HTML 39 29 13 10 8
EKOS Research Associates October 6, 2009 HTML 39.7 25.7 15.2 9.7 9.7
Strategic Counsel October 4, 2009 HTML 41 28 14 9 9
Angus Reid Strategies September 30, 2009 PDF 37 27 17 11 6
EKOS Research Associates September 29, 2009 HTML 36.0 29.7 13.9 9.8 10.5
Angus Reid Strategies September 24, 2009 PDF 37 29 16 9 8
EKOS Research Associates September 22, 2009 HTML 37.0 29.9 13.8 9.1 10.2
EKOS Research Associates September 15, 2009 HTML 35.1 29.9 16.5 9.6 9.0
Angus Reid Strategies September 13, 2009 PDF 36 29 17 10 7
Harris-Decima September 13, 2009 PDF 34 30 15 9 10
Ipsos Reid September 13, 2009 HTML 39 30 12 9 8
EKOS Research Associates September 8, 2009 HTML 34.2 30.8 14.8 10 10.1
Harris-Decima September 6, 2009 HTML 34 31 15 8 10
Strategic Counsel September 6, 2009 HTML 35 30 14 12 9
Nanos Research September 2, 2009 PDF 37.5 33.4 14.8 9.7 4.6
Angus Reid Strategies September 2, 2009 PDF 33 32 19 9 7
EKOS Research Associates September 1, 2009 PDF 32.6 32.6 16.5 8.3 9.9
Pollara September 1, 2009 HTML 36 36 16 8 3
Angus Reid Strategies August 26, 2009 PDF 34 30 18 8 9
EKOS Research Associates August 25, 2009 PDF 32.6 30.9 15.7 9.5 11.3
Harris-Decima August 24, 2009 HTML 31 32 16 9 11
Ipsos Reid August 24, 2009 HTML 39 28 14 8 10
EKOS Research Associates August 18, 2009 PDF 32.0 30.2 17.3 8.7 11.0
EKOS Research Associates August 11, 2009 PDF 32.7 31.0 16.5 9.0 10.1
EKOS Research Associates August 4, 2009 PDF 34.9 31.9 13.8 8.6 10.8
Nanos Research August 2, 2009 PDF 31.3 33.8 18.7 9.2 7.0
Angus Reid Strategies July 28, 2009 PDF 33 34 16 10 7
EKOS Research Associates July 28, 2009 PDF 32.5 34.1 14.5 8.6 10.4
EKOS Research Associates July 21, 2009 PDF 32.8 32.5 14.8 8.4 11.5
Angus Reid Strategies July 17, 2009 PDF 33 30 18 11 6
EKOS Research Associates July 14, 2009 PDF 34.1 32.4 15.2 8.7 9.6
EKOS Research Associates July 7, 2009 PDF 31.8 32.2 16.0 9.3 10.7
Angus Reid Strategies July 3, 2009 PDF 36 30 16 10 7
EKOS Research Associates June 29, 2009 PDF 31.0 32.2 16.2 9.0 11.5
EKOS Research Associates June 23, 2009 PDF 34.8 32.6 14.3 9.0 9.3
Nanos Research June 21, 2009 PDF 32.2 36.3 16.8 9.8 4.8
Angus Reid Strategies June 18, 2009 PDF 32 31 18 11 7
EKOS Research Associates June 16, 2009 PDF 32.4 33.7 16.3 8.4 9.0
EKOS Research Associates June 9, 2009 PDF 30.3 35.0 15.1 9.2 10.4
Harris-Decima June 8, 2009 PDF 31 35 15 9 8
Strategic Counsel June 7, 2009 HTML 30 34 16 9 11
Ipsos Reid June 4, 2009 HTML 33 36 12 9 9
Nanos Research June 1, 2009 PDF 31.8 37.2 15.7 8.0 7.4
Angus Reid Strategies May 29, 2009 PDF 31 33 17 9 7
EKOS Research Associates May 28, 2009 PDF 32.3 33.5 15.1 8.7 10.4
Ipsos Reid May 24, 2009 HTML 35 33 14 9 8
Strategic Counsel May 10, 2009 PDF 30 35 16 9 11
Harris-Decima May 3, 2009 PDF 29 34 15 9 11
Nanos Research April 30, 2009 PDF 33 36 15 9 7
Ipsos Reid April 30, 2009 HTML 33 36 13 9 8
Angus Reid Strategies April 22, 2009 PDF 33 33 15 10 6
Harris-Decima April 19, 2009 PDF 29 32 16 9 11
EKOS Research Associates April 13, 2009 PDF 30.2 36.7 15.5 9.4 8.1
Strategic Counsel April 5, 2009 PDF 32 34 15 10 9
Leger Marketing March 23, 2009 PDF 34 35 14 9 6
Nanos Research March 18, 2009 PDF 33 36 13 10 8
Angus Reid Strategies March 11, 2009 PDF 35 31 16 10 7
Harris-Decima March 8, 2009 PDF 32 33 14 9 10
Strategic Counsel March 8, 2009 PDF 35 31 16 9 10
Ipsos Reid March 5, 2009 HTML 37 33 12 10 8
Harris-Decima February 15, 2009 PDF 33 33 15 10 7
Strategic Counsel February 8, 2009 PDF 32 33 17 5 13
Harris-Decima February 8, 2009 PDF 33 31 15 10 10
Ipsos Reid February 7, 2009 HTML 37 31 14 10 7
Nanos Research February 3, 2009 PDF 34 33 16 10 7
Angus Reid Strategies January 27, 2009 PDF 38 29 18 8 6
EKOS Research Associates January 17, 2009 PDF 36.2 32.6 14.3 7.9 9.1
Angus Reid Strategies January 15, 2009 PDF 39 30 17 9 5
Strategic Counsel January 14, 2009 PDF 36 29 18 8 8
Ipsos Reid January 8, 2009 HTML 39 28 15 9 9
Nanos Research January 7, 2009 PDF 33 34 19 7 7
COMPAS December 23, 2008 PDF 43 30 13 6 8
Angus Reid Strategies December 12, 2008 PDF 37 31 15 9 8
Ipsos Reid December 11, 2008 HTML 45 26 12 10 7
Angus Reid Strategies December 6, 2008 PDF 42 22 18 10 7
Praxicus Public Strategies December 4, 2008 HTML 47 24 14 8 8
COMPAS December 4, 2008 PDF 51 20 10 8 6
EKOS Research Associates December 4, 2008 PDF 42.2 23.6 15.0 10.2 9.0
Strategic Counsel December 3, 2008 PDF 45 24 14 10 8
Ipsos Reid December 3, 2008 HTML 46 23 13 9 8
EKOS Research Associates December 3, 2008 PDF 44.0 24.1 14.5 9.2 8.1
Nanos Research November 15, 2008 PDF 32 30 20 9 10
Election 2008 October 14, 2008 HTML 37.6 26.2 18.2 10.0 6.8

Leadership polls

Aside from conducting the usual opinion surveys on general party preferences, polling firms also survey public opinion on who would make the best Prime Minister:

Polling Firm Last Date of Polling Link Stephen Harper Michael Ignatieff Jack Layton Gilles Duceppe Elizabeth May
Angus Reid Public Opinion April 29, 2011 PDF 31 11 29 3 1
Ipsos Reid April 28, 2011 HTML 42 13 45 - -
Angus Reid Public Opinion April 16, 2011 PDF 28 13 27 3 3
Angus Reid Public Opinion April 5, 2011 PDF 30 14 21 3 3
Ipsos Reid March 26, 2011 HTML 49 17 34 - -

See also

References

External links

Retrieved from "https://infogalactic.com/w/index.php?title=Opinion_polling_for_the_2011_Canadian_federal_election&oldid=726257775"