Join Last.fm or log in to leave a shout.
-
-
Replies
-
-
-
This shout is unavailable.
-
Replies
-
-
-
Replies
-
asilentfire
no, because people listen to 80s music (idk why) but nobody listens to 19"10's" music
Actions
Replies
-
-
-
-
-
-
This shout is unavailable.
-
This shout is unavailable.
-
-
This shout is unavailable.
-
fearimpaired
I don't see no FUCKING meaning in tagging 2010s as "10s", because that shit is so much you can find it any other way. But there are some rare recordings from 1910s which are difficult to find, and this tag could be helpful, if it weren't spoiled by that 2010 shit. FUCK!
Actions
-
-
-
-
-
This shout is unavailable.
-
-
This shout is unavailable.
-
-
-
-
-
Retro_Saiyan
At the moment I am listening to tracks from 1912. There's something creepy about hearing voices from over 100 years ago.
Actions
-
This shout is unavailable.
-
Retro_Saiyan
Someone should issue that an album that combines 1910s recordings with 2010s recordings, and tell listeners to "notice the changes in popular music". Pretty silly idea I admit, but still....
Actions
-
-
-
This shout is unavailable.
-
-
This shout is unavailable.
-
Ariues
show me this music made in the 1910s! ive never heard of suck things. besides that was so long ago that few people are alive that remember that decade, and very soon if not already this decade will be the 10s and that decade will be the 1910s. unless youre 100+ or have some affinity for the 1910s, this decade is YOUR 10s.
Actions
-
RRRRRicardo
No 2010 should be tagged as 2010s but 10s should be retagged to 1910s too, because the 10s were actually year 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19. But music couldn't be recorded back then :-p
Actions
-
-
This shout is unavailable.
-