Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 8 views

    G.R. No. L-1235 July 29, 1947 AMADO BUENAVENTURA, Petitioner, EULALIO GARCIA, Judge of First Instance of Rizal, and BASILIO GARCIA

    Uploaded by

    xynnnn
    This document is a summary of a court case from July 29, 1947. It discusses a petitioner, Amado Buenaventura, who is asking the respondent judge of the Rizal court to issue an order for the execution of a previous judgment from a civil case from 1941. The petitioner had filed a motion in 1946 to reconstitute the case records since they had been destroyed during the war. The judge of the Rizal court had issued an order dated January 28, 1946 to reconstitute the case records after a hearing on the petitioner's motion.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    G.R. No. L-1235 July 29, 1947 AMADO BUENAVENTURA, Petitioner, EULALIO GARCIA, Judge of First Instance of Rizal, and BASILIO GARCIA

    Uploaded by

    xynnnn
    8 views1 page
    This document is a summary of a court case from July 29, 1947. It discusses a petitioner, Amado Buenaventura, who is asking the respondent judge of the Rizal court to issue an order for the execution of a previous judgment from a civil case from 1941. The petitioner had filed a motion in 1946 to reconstitute the case records since they had been destroyed during the war. The judge of the Rizal court had issued an order dated January 28, 1946 to reconstitute the case records after a hearing on the petitioner's motion.

    Original Description:

    1235

    Original Title

    GR 1235

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document is a summary of a court case from July 29, 1947. It discusses a petitioner, Amado Buenaventura, who is asking the respondent judge of the Rizal court to issue an order for the execution of a previous judgment from a civil case from 1941. The petitioner had filed a motion in 1946 to reconstitute the case records since they had been destroyed during the war. The judge of the Rizal court had issued an order dated January 28, 1946 to reconstitute the case records after a hearing on the petitioner's motion.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    8 views1 page

    G.R. No. L-1235 July 29, 1947 AMADO BUENAVENTURA, Petitioner, EULALIO GARCIA, Judge of First Instance of Rizal, and BASILIO GARCIA

    Uploaded by

    xynnnn
    This document is a summary of a court case from July 29, 1947. It discusses a petitioner, Amado Buenaventura, who is asking the respondent judge of the Rizal court to issue an order for the execution of a previous judgment from a civil case from 1941. The petitioner had filed a motion in 1946 to reconstitute the case records since they had been destroyed during the war. The judge of the Rizal court had issued an order dated January 28, 1946 to reconstitute the case records after a hearing on the petitioner's motion.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 1

    G.R. No.

    L-1235

    July 29, 1947

    AMADO BUENAVENTURA, petitioner, vs. EULALIO GARCIA, Judge of First Instance of Rizal, and BASILIO GARCIA, respondents. Rosendo J. Tansinsin for petitioner. Felicisimo S. Guerrero for respondents. BENGZON, J.: Petitioner asks that the respondent judge of first instance of Rizal be commanded to issue an order for the execution of the judgment of the court in civil case No. R-7848, entitled "Basilio Garcia vs. Amado Buenaventura." It appears that on January 7, 1946, the herein petitioner filed, in the Rizal court a motion for the reconstitution of the record of the said litigation alleging, among other things, that the papers had been destroyed during the war, that decision of the case had been rendered by the Rizal court on November 21, 1941; that the appeal therefrom had been dismissed by the Court of Appeals; that such dismissal had been affirmed by the Supreme Court sometime in July, 1944, and that subsequently the expediente had been returned to the court of origin. Copy of the motion was sent to the adverse party, and after hearing, the following "Auto" dated January 28, 1946 was issued by Judge Emilio Pea:

    You might also like