DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION

Table 1: Age of the respondents.

Age No .of. respondents Percentage(%) of respondents
20-30 yrs 80 66.4
31-40 yrs 20 16.6
41-50 yrs 15 12.45
Above 51 yrs 5 4.15
Total 120 100

Chart1: Age of the respondents.

Interpretation:
From the above table it is analyzed that 66.4% are in the age group of 20-30 yrs, 16.6%
of the respondents are in the age group of 31-40 yrs, 12.45% of the respondents are in the age
group of 41-50 yrs, 4.15% of the respondents are in the age group of above 51 yrs.
Inference:
Majority of the respondents are in the age group of 20-30 yrs.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
20-30 yrs 31-40 yrs 41-50 yrs Above 51
yrs
66.4
16.6
12.45
4.15
Table 2: Marital status of the respondents:
Marital status No. of respondents Percentage(%) of respondents
Married 95 78.85
Unmarried 25 20.75
Total 120 100

Chart2: Age of the respondents.


Interpretation:
From the above table it is clear that 79% of the respondents are married and 21% of the
respondents are unmarried.

Inference:
Majority of the respondents of 79% are married.

Married,
78.85, 79%
Unmarried,
20.75, 21%
Table 3: Levels of the respondents.

Chart 3: levels of the respondents.


Interpretation:
From the above table it is clear that 8.3% of the respondents belong to the entry level,
33.2% of the respondents belong to the junior level, 41.5% of the respondents belong to the
middle level, 16.6% of the respondents belong to the senior level of the management.
Inference:
Majority of the respondents 41.5% belong to the middle management level.

0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Entry level Junior level Middle
level
Senior level
8.3
33.2
41.5
16.6
Levels No. of respondents Percentage(%) of respondents
Entry level 10 8.3
Junior level 40 33.2
Middle level 50 41.5
Senior level 20 16.6
Total 120 100
Table 4: Recognized by management for your efforts.

Chart 4: Recognized by management for your efforts.

Interpretation:
From the above table it is clear that 41.5% of the respondent take recognition as highly
important, 33.2% of the respondent take recognition as important, 12.45% of the respondent take
recognition as neutral, 8.3% of the respondent take recognition as not important, 4.15% of the
respondent take recognition as not important.
Inference:
Majority of the respondents of 41.5% recognition as highly important.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Highly
important
Important Neutral Not
important
Highly not
important
66.67
12.5
8.33 8.33
4.17
Respondents being recognized No. of respondents Percentage(%) of respondents
Highly important 80
66.67
Important 15
12.50
Neutral 10
8.33
Not important 6
8.33
Highly not important 5
4.17
Total 120 100
Table 5: Recognized by peers and co-workers.

Chart 5: Recognition by peers and co-workers.

Interpretation:
From the above table it is clear that 41.5% of the respondent take recognition as highly
important, 33.2% of the respondent take recognition as important, 12.45% of the respondent take
recognition as neutral, 8.3% of the respondent take recognition as not important, 4.15% of the
respondent take recognition as not important.
Inference:
Majority of the respondents of 41.5% recognition as highly important.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Highly
important
Important Neutral Not
important
Highly not
important
41.5
33.2
12.45
8.3
4.15
Respondents being recognized No. of respondents Percentage(%) of respondents
Highly important 50 41.5
Important 40 33.2
Neutral 15 12.45
Not important 10 8.3
Highly not important 5 4.15
Total 120 100
Table 6: Receiving recognition for team accomplishment.

Chart 6: Receiving recognition for team accomplishment.

Interpretation:
From the above table it is clear that 49.8% of the respondent take recognition as highly
important, 29.05% of the respondent take recognition as important, 12.45% of the respondent
take recognition as neutral, 8.3% of the respondent take recognition as not important, 4.15% of
the respondent take recognition as not important.
Inference:
Majority of the respondents 49.8% take recognition for team accomplishment as highly
important.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Highly
important
Important Neutral Not
important
Highly not
important
49.8
29.05
12.45
8.3
4.15
Respondents being recognized No. of respondents Percentage(%) of respondents
Highly important 60 49.8
Important 35 29.05
Neutral 10 12.45
Not important 10 8.3
Highly not important 5 4.15
Total 120 100
Table 7: Independence and freedom to influence work content and methods.

Chart 7: Independence and freedom to influence work content and methods.

Interpretation:
From the above table it is clear that 56.44% of the respondent take recognition as highly
important, 16.6% of the respondent take recognition as important, 9.96% of the respondent take
recognition as neutral, 9.96% of the respondent take recognition as not important, 6.64% of the
respondent take recognition as not important.
Inference:
Majority of the respondents 56.44% have the independence and freedom to influence
work contents and methods as highly important.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Highly
important
Important Neutral Not
important
Highly not
important
56.44
16.6
9.96 9.96
6.64
Respondents being recognized No. of respondents Percentage(%) of respondents
Highly important 68 56.44
Important 20 16.6
Neutral 12 9.96
Not important 12 9.96
Highly not important 8 6.64
Total 120 100
Table 8: Bonuses and other financial incentives.

Chart 8: Bonuses and other financial incentives.

Interpretation:
From the above table it is clear that 74.7% of the respondent take recognition as highly
important, 9.13% of the respondent take recognition as important, 6.64% of the respondent take
recognition as neutral, 4.98% of the respondent take recognition as not important, 4.15% of the
respondent take recognition as not important.
Inference:
Majority of the respondents of 74.7% take bonuses and other financial incentives as
highly important.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Highly
important
Important Neutral Not
important
Highly not
important
82.5
4.17
5.83
5
2.5
Respondents being recognized No. of respondents Percentage(%) of respondents
Highly important 99 82.50
Important 5 4.17
Neutral 7 5.83
Not important 6 5.00
Highly not important 3 2.50
Total 120 100
Table 9: Possibility to achieve promotion.

Chart 9: Possibility to achieve promotion.

Interpretation:
From the above table it is clear that 78.85% of the respondent take recognition as highly
important, 9.13% of the respondent take recognition as important, 6.64% of the respondent take
recognition as neutral, 2.49% of the respondent take recognition as not important, 2.49% of the
respondent take recognition as not important.
Inference:
Majority of the respondents of 78.85% take possibility of promotion as highly important.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Highly
important
Important Neutral Not
important
Highly not
important
78.85
9.13
6.64
2.49 2.49
Respondents being recognized No. of respondents Percentage(%) of respondents
Highly important 95 78.85
Important 11 9.13
Neutral 8 6.64
Not important 3 2.49
Highly not important 3 2.49
Total 120 100
Table 10: Participation in decision- making.

Chart 10: Participation in decision- making.

Interpretation:
From the above table it is clear that 74.7% of the respondent take recognition as highly
important, 9.13% of the respondent take recognition as important, 6.64% of the respondent take
recognition as neutral, 4.98% of the respondent take recognition as not important, 4.15% of the
respondent take recognition as not important.
Inference:
Majority of the respondents of 74.7% take participating in decision as highly important.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Highly
important
Important Neutral Not
important
Highly not
important
74.7
9.13
6.64
4.98
4.15
Respondents being recognized No. of respondents Percentage(%) of respondents
Highly important 90 74.7
Important 11 9.13
Neutral 8 6.64
Not important 6 4.98
Highly not important 5 4.15
Total 120 100
Table 11: Received recognition and praise for my work.

Chart 11: Received recognition and praise for my work.

Interpretation:
From the above table it is clear that 41.5% of the respondent as strongly agree, 33.2% of
the respondent as agree, 12.45% of the respondents as neither agree nor disagree, 8.3% of the
respondent as disagree, 4.15% of the respondent as strongly disagree.
Inference:
Majority of the respondents of 41.5% strongly agree.

41.5
33.2
12.45
8.3
4.15
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neither agree nor
disagree
Disagree
Strongly disagree
Respondents being recognized No. of respondents Percentage(%) of respondents
Strongly Agree 50 41.5
Agree 40 33.2
Neither agree nor disagree 15 12.45
Disagree 10 8.3
Strongly disagree 5 4.15
Total 120 100
Table 12: Encouraged for my development.

Chart 12: Encouraged for my development.

Interpretation:
From the above table it is clear that 56.44% of the respondent as strongly agree, 16.6% of
the respondent agree, 9.96% of the respondent neither agree nor disagree, 9.96% of the
respondent take recognition as disagree, 6.64% of the respondent as strongly disagree.
Inference:
Majority of the respondents 56.44% strongly agree for encouraged for their
development.
56.44
16.6
9.96
9.96
6.64
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neither agree nor
disagree
Disagree
Strongly disagree
Respondents being recognized No. of respondents Percentage(%) of respondents
Strongly Agree 68 56.44
Agree 20 16.6
Neither agree nor disagree 12 9.96
Disagree 12 9.96
Strongly disagree 8 6.64
Total 120 100
Table 13: Overall satisfaction with the current rewards and recognition programs offered by the
organization.

Chart 13: Overall satisfaction with the current rewards and recognition programs offered by the
organization.

Interpretation:
From the above table it is clear that 77.19% of the respondent strongly agree, 9.96% of
the respondent agree, 6.64% of the respondent neither agree nor disagree, 4.98% of the
respondent disagree, 0.83% of the respondent as strongly disagree.
Inference: majority of the respondents of 77.19% strongly agree that they have overall
satisfaction with the current rewards and recognition programs.
77.19
9.96
6.64
4.98
0.83
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neither agree nor
disagree
Disagree
Strongly disagree
Respondents being recognized No. of respondents Percentage(%) of respondents
Strongly Agree 93 77.19
Agree 12 9.96
Neither agree nor disagree 8 6.64
Disagree 6 4.98
Strongly disagree 1 0.83
Total 120 100
Table 14: Received an award from organization.
Award No. of respondents Percentage(%) of respondents
Yes 45 37.35
No 75 62.25
Total 120 100

Chart 14: Received an award from organization.

Interpretation:
From the above table it is clear that 37.35% of the respondents receive award from the
organization, 62.25% of the respondents dont receive award from the organization.
Inference:
Majority of the respondents of 62.25% dont receive award from the organization.



Yes , 45
No , 75
Total, 120
Table 15: Aware of the procedures for nominating an employee for an award.

Chart 15: Aware of the procedures for nominating an employee for an award.

Interpretation:
From the above table it is clear that 78.85% of the respondent as strongly agree, 9.13% of
the respondent as agree, 6.64% of the respondent as neither agree nor disagree, 2.49% of the
respondent as disagree, 2.49% of the respondent as strongly disagree.
Inference:
Majority of the respondents of 78.85% are aware of the procedures for nominating the
employee for an award.

0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Strongly
Agree
Agree Neither
agree nor
disagree
Disagree Strongly
disagree
78.85
9.13
6.64
2.49 2.49
Respondents being recognized No. of respondents Percentage(%) of respondents
Strongly Agree 95 78.85
Agree 11 9.13
Neither agree nor disagree 8 6.64
Disagree 3 2.49
Strongly disagree 3 2.49
Total 120 100
CHI SQUARE TEST
Relationship Between Recognized by management for your efforts And Bonuses
and other financial incentives
H
0

There is no significant difference Recognized by management for your efforts
And Bonuses and other financial incentives
H
1

There is significant difference between Recognized by management for your
efforts And Bonuses and other financial incentives






Bonuses and other financial incentives
Respondents being recognized No. of respondents
Highly important 99
Important 5
Neutral 7
Not important 6
Highly not important 3
Total 120

Recognized by management for your efforts
Respondents being recognized No. of respondents
Highly important 80
Important 15
Neutral 10
Not important 10
Highly not important 5
Total 120
Particulars Highly
important
Important Neutral Not
important
Highly not
important
Total
Recognized by
management for your
efforts
80 15 10 10 5 120
Respondents being
recognized
99 5 7 6 3 120
TOTAL 179 20 17 16 8 240

Expected frequency(E)
Particulars Calculation Expected frequency
80 99 (179*120)/240 89.5
15 5
(20*120)/240
10
10 7
(17*120)/240
8.5
10 6
(16*120)/240
8
5 3
(8*120)/240
4


O = Observed frequency
E = Expected frequency
O E (O-E) (O-E)
2
(O-E)
2
/E
80 89.5 -9.5 90.25 1.01
99 89.5 9.5 90.25 1.01
15 10 5 25 2.50
5 10 -5 25 2.50
10 8.5 1.5 2.25 0.26
7 8.5 -1.5 2.25 0.26
10 8 2 4 0.50
6 8 -2 4 0.50
5 4 1 1 0.25
3 4 -1 1 0.25

9.05
Calculated chi- square value

= 9.05
Degrees Of Freedom (DOF) = (r-1)*(c-1)
(2-1)*(5-1) = 4
Conclusion
H
0
ACCEPTED

The Calculated Chi-square value is less than the Table Value, thus H
0
is ACCEPTED
Therefore,
H
0

There is no significant difference Recognized by management for your efforts
And Bonuses and other financial incentives






The table value at LS of 5% for 4 = 9.49