0the Victorian Age
0the Victorian Age
0the Victorian Age
Romantic. Specifically, the ancient Greek epics can be called Romantic, as much as literature of the Middle Ages and of the
Renaissance or Elizabethan Age can, as far as they cultivated the romance.
Under the sign of Romanticism, writers could release their imagination; sincerity of the feelings stirred their social and moral
sidei, originality and sensitiveness. All their writings emphasise human adventure, passion, delight, and love of splendour, of
extravagance and of the supernatural ii. The main philosophical ideas of that time placed man in the centre of the Universe and the
artists pleaded for the re-evaluation of the medieval and antique motifs and ideals. There was a preference for myth, symbol, dream,
magic. In the literary style prevails the blending of lyrical elements, and even dramatic elements, in the structure of the novel. This
explosion of fantasy and of the inner ego has its origins in the changing of society.
Of all literary movements, the Romantic one is the most difficult to define. Romantic artists did not flourish at exactly the
same time in different countries, but they did share some general characteristics. They asserted the importance of emotion over reason,
they stressed the individual personality over social and artistic conformity, and they focussed on personal experience rather than on
rules and traditions, as the best guide to truth and happiness. Romantics went to nature as a source of inspiration. One of the most
significant elements in the Romantic spirit was idealism. Romantic artists posses a deep-rooted belief in a noble way of life; they
often see the real world as a reflection of an ideal world.
The Romantic Age in England saw excruciating living conditions as well as the possibility for relief and improvement. The
Romantic poets keenly felt the strength of the common working people and the promise of freedom from oppression. In the Preface
accompanying the second edition of Lyrical Ballads, Wordsworth enunciated his aims, among which was the belief that poetry should
reflect spontaneity and emotion, that the language should be accessible and the events should be presented from an unusual point of
viewiii. Though Romanticism shared with Neo-classicism an interest in the past, Romanticism emphasised Ancient Greece over
Ancient Rome. Furthermore, the Romantic concern with the past encompassed a renewed interest in the Middle Ages.
Therefore, Victorian literature, as well as almost the whole European literature of the 19th century, identifies mainly with
Realism.
As an aesthetic doctrine, Realism appears as a reaction to Romanticism, being generated by the great scientific discoveries
and by the social and philosophical changes. To sensitiveness and imagination are opposed lucidity and will. Therefore, the swing
from Romanticism to Realism seems to have been a natural reaction. The realist writer observes human behaviour, he empathises,
while the romantic writer projects himself, reveals some of his own psychological features and lends them to his characters iv.
From a literary point of view, Realism shows that the artist does not have to idealise reality, but see it the way it is, taking
into account the relation cause effect, the psychical reactions, and so on. The artists wanted to tell the unadorned truth of life as they
saw it: harsh, hard, sometimes joyful, but usually filled with work, pain, and disillusion. They stripped away the lovely masks of the
Romantics and sought to get to the heart of the human condition.
The greatest Realist achievements are the novels. They reveal vast panoramas of people and places, complex life stories. The
reader felt the necessity of reality, of objectivity. Yet, the reality being sometimes dry and colourless, it had to be adorned with
imaginary elements. This is why, in many novels belonging to Realism, Romantic elements interfere, giving new dimensions and a
necessary complexity to the plot and to the characters. The social problems came in the first place, erupted from the people
subconscious, meaning the same world of magic and archetypes, so much enjoyed by the Romantics.
The Victorian Age means the consolidation of capitalist ideology, the triumph of Jeremy Benthams and John Stuart Mills
philosophy that will generate modern Utilitarianismv, based on positivism and agnosticism. Although in the 19th century we can notice
a development of almost all present days theories, as scientism, symbolism, realism, naturalism vi, etc., the novel is generally known as
the Victorian novel.
Its main characteristics are the direct observation of reality (Charles Dickens, W. M. Thackeray, A. Trollope, Ch. Bront, W.
Collins), as well as the interest for introspection, society/individual relation, or individual/individual relation, also meant the detailed
description of mannersvii (G. Eliot, Th. Hardy, G. Meredith).
Nevertheless, no matter to what category they were included into, their concern for the poor as reflected in their novels, made
some critics in the 1950s associate it with Marxismviii. During the development of the novel, we can notice a more philosophic
analysis of the implications of a situation, and a more careful and poetic rendering of experience ix.
Like the Elizabethan drama, the Victorian novel could be subdivided into novels about history, crime, mystery, domestic
novelsx.
From another point of view, Albert Thibaudetxi considers Dickens as an exponent of the passive novel, because he describes
society as it is, and does not re-create one.
In the pages that follow we shall show how much Dickens was a writer of recording passive novels, a Realist, a Romantic, or
how all of these blended in the Dickensian work.
Notes:
Ren Wellek Istoria Criticii Literare Moderne, ed. Univers, Bucureti, 1974, vol.IV, p. 148.
Dicionar de termeni literari, coord. Al. Sndulescu, ed. Academiei R.S.R., Bucureti, 1976, p. 383, 384.
iii
Leon Levichi, Sever Trifu, Veronica Foceneanu Istoria Literaturii Engleze i Americane, ed. Dacia, ClujNapoca, 1994, vol. II, p. 204.
iv
Ren Wellek, Austin Warren Teoria Literaturii, Editura Pentru Literatur Universal, 1967, Bucureti, p.
v
Dicionar de termeni literari, p. 470.
vi
Ren Wellek op. cit., vol. III, p. 28.
vii
Ren Wellek op. cit., vol.IV, p. 2.
viii
Boris Ford (editor) The Pelican Guide to English Literature, Penguin Books, 1958, vol. V, p. 98.
ix
Boris Ford op. cit., p. 104.
x
Boris Ford op. cit., p. 103.
xi
Albert Thibaudet Fiziologia criticii, Editura Pentru Literatur Universal, Bucureti, 1966, p. 173, 619.
ii